VDA 63 Auditbericht VersR9 P3 Ext Engl

8/10/2019 VDA 63 Auditbericht VersR9 P3 Ext Engl

1/17

VDA QMC

disclaimer:VDA QMC provide you as a participant of a seminar, free of charge, with thefollowing excel data file

for use of assessment and reporting of VDA 6.3 potential analysis.

The use of this excel based reporting is at users risk only.

VDA QMC as well as the designer of this data file do not take over any

responsibility for correctness of calculations and proposed classifications.

The whole data file is not secured or blocked in any areas. All boxes can changed

resp. deleted.

The user of this data file has no claim for any support as well as updates from VDA

QMC or the designers. User shall use the entry boxes only, to ensure that the

formulas of the assessment tool will not be damaged. This will be exemplified

during the training in detail. Users have no claim for support as well as updates by

VDA QMC and/or the designers of this tool.

Copyright:The datafile is copyright of VDA QMC. Every use or hand over to third parties which

violate the copyright of VDA QMC is illegal and incure a penalty as long as there is

no acceptance by VDA QMC. This in particular is relevant for any copies,

translations, micro films, saving and handling in electronic systems.


2/17

Produkt- und Prozessaudit

Data input to create report

Contract:

Date:

Reason for contract:

Contract issued by (name, dep.):

Auditor: Department:

Lead auditor: Department:

Suppl.-No.: Function: Name:

DUNS-No.: Top management:

Supplier/Organization: Production management:

Street: Quality management:

Production site (location): Customer support:Authorisied person of organization: Design/Development:

Production site (postal code):

Phone:

Fax:

Certificate- / Audit base No.:

Issue-Date:

Conducted by:Result:

Product group : First: Second: Third:

Prod.-Gr.-No. (acc. catalog): a b c

Prod. Titel (acc. catalog):

Process steps: Title: E1 - E10 Process step-No.: last audit: result

1 one

2 two

3 three

Pleas

Last audit results / certificates


3/17

A Development

P2 Project management

.2.1 .2.2* .2.3 .2.4 .2.5* .2.6 .2.7*

n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.

P3 Planning the product and process developement

Product Process

.3.1 .3.2* .3.3 .3.4 .3.5 .3.1 .3.2* .3.3 .3.4 .3.5

n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. EPdP n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.

P4 Carrying out the prduct and process development

Product Process

.4.1 .4.2 .4.3 .4.4 .4.5* 4.6. 4.7. 4.8. 4.9. .4.1 .4.2 .4.3 .4.4 .4.5* .4.6 .4.7 .4.8 .4.

n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. EPdR n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.

B Serial production.5.1* .5.2 .5.3 .5.4* .5.5* .5.6 .5.7

P5 Supplier management n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.

P6 Process analysis production

1 Process input

6.1.1* .6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.5 6.2.1* .6.2.2 6.2.3* 6.2.4* 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.3.1 6.3.2* 6.3.3 6.4.1 6.4.2* 6.4.3 6.4.4 6.5.1 6.5.2 6.5.3*

Process step 1: one

n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.

Process step 2: two


Process step 3: three


Process step 4: four


Process step 5: five


Process step 6: sixn.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.

Process step 7: seven

n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b.Process step 8: eight

5 Process effectivene4 Material Ressources3 Process support2 Work content / Process sequence

VDA VDA 6.3 Process Audit: Assessment Matr

n.b.

n.b.

n.a. n.a.


4/17

2

3

4

7

9

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N

Process audit Result VDA 6.3 Questionaire process audit

Location:

No. Question Weaknesses/recommend

Project management

Generally

2.1 Is the project organisation (project management) established

and are tasks & authorities specified for the team leader and

team members?

n.b.

2.2 x Are the resources required for the project development

planned and available and are all changes displayed?

n.b. entry text

2.3 Is there a project plan and has this been agreed with the

customer?

n.b. entry text

2.4 Is change management in the project ensured by the project

organisation?

n.b. entry text

2.5 x Are the responsible personnel within the organisation and in

the customer's company involved in the change control

system?

n.b. entry text

2.6 Is there a QM plan for the project? Is this implemented and

monitored regularly for compliance?

n.b. entry text

2.7 x Is there an established escalation process and is this

implemented effectively?

n.b. entry text

P3Planning of the product- and process

developmentProduc

t

Process

3.1 Are the product and process-specific requirements laid down? n.b. n.b. entry text

3.2 x Has manufacturing feasibility been assessed in a cross-

functional manner, based on the requirements which have

been determined for product & process?

n.b. n.b. entry text

3.3 Are there plans for the product and process development? n.b. n.b. entry text

3.4 Have the necessary resources been taken into account for

the product and process development?


3.5 Is QM planning arranged for sourcing bought-in products and

services?


P4 Carrying out the product- and process

developmento

duct

ocess

*Stars

Contract-No:

Date:


5/17

9

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N

No. Question Weaknesses/recommend

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

6.1.5 Are changes to the product or process in the course of serial

production tracked and documented?

n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. entry text

6.2 Work co ntent / Process sequence (Are al l product ion

processes contro l led)o

ne

two

three

four

five

s

ix

s

ix

s

even

n

ine

ten

6.2.1 x Are all the relevant details listed in the production and

test/inspection documents, based on the production control

plan?


6.2.2 Are production operations checked / approved and are setting

data logged?


6.2.3 x Can the customer's specific product requirements be satisfied

with the production facilities used?


6.2.4 x Are significant characteristics controlled in production? n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. entry text

6.2.5 Are scrap, rework and setting parts kept separate and

identified?


6.2.6 Is the flow of materials and parts secured against mixing /

wrong items?


6.3 Process sup por t / Personel l resourcesone

two

three

four

five

six

six

seven

nine

ten

6.3.1Are operators given responsibility and authority to monitor the

quality of product and process?


6.3.2 xAre the operators able to carry out their allotted tasks and are

their qualifications kept up-to-date?


6.3.3 Is there a personnel employment plan?n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. entry text

6.4 Material resour cesone

two

three

four

five

six

six

seven

nine

ten

6.4.1How are the maintenance and overhaul of production facilities

/ tools controlled?


6.4.2 xCan the quality requirements be monitored effectively with the

test, inspection and measurement facilities employed?


6.4.3Are the work-stations and test/inspection areas suitable for

requirements?


6.4.4Are tools, equipment and test/inspection facilities stored

correctly?


6.5 Process effect iveness (integrate effect iveness,eff iciency, el imination of waste)

one

two

three

four

five

six

six

seve

n

nine

ten

6.5.1 Are target requirements set for product and process? n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. entry text

6.5.2 Are quality and process data logged in such a way that they n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. entry text


6/17

Auditited Organization (Supplier):

Date:

Location:

Process / ProductAssessment-

indexAchieved Classified Findings / Requirements:

EG n.b.

Product group

a EPN 0%

b EPN 0% c EPN 0%

d EPN 0%

Audit history / Certificates

Date Carried out

Distribution:

Participants: 1. Timings for improvement plan: ---

for actions see "improvement plan" and/or "immediate actions"

Reason

for

contract:

0

00

0

0

n.b.

Report contain additional assessment question regarding

VDA 6.3 questionaire?

grading scale: A = 90 - 100% quality-capable; B >= 80 - 90% conditionally quality-capable; C = 0 -

< 80% not quality-capable.

Result

OYes ONo

Audit base

Overall process P2 to P7

VDA 6.3 Auditreport Assessment of Quality Capabilty

Contract-

No.:

Contract

isued by:

Supl.-No:


7/17

Prozessaudit

Target Target

level achieved 60 70 80 90 level achieved 60 70 80

[%] [%]

P2 n.b. Process input EU1 n.b.

P3n.b

EU2n.b.

P4 n.b EU3 n.b.

P5 n.b EU4 n.b.

P6 n.b EU5 n.b.

P7 n.b EU6 n.b.

E1 n.b EU7 n.b.

E2 n.b.

E3 n.b. PV n.b.

E4 n.b. ZI n.b.

E5 n.b. KO n.b.

E6 n.b. RI n.b.

E7 n.b. EG n.b.

E8 n.b.

Overallcompliance

Process

responsibilty

Target orientation

Communication

Risk orientation

Process

effectiveness levelProcess

result

Contract:

Material resources

Assessment

elements

100

Project management

Transport/Parts-

handling/ Storage

Assessment after process analysis (mean

value process steps E1-n) and generic

baseline

Generic baseline

Min. requirement per

assessment element

Process sequencePersonnel

resources

Carrying out

Product / Process

Supplier Management

Process analysis

Min. requirement per

assessment element

Assessment

element/ Process

steps

Planning

Product / Process

five

six

Customer satisfaction

one

two

three

four

eight

seven


8/17

Prozessaudit

Explanations Contract:

Participants:

Organization: Auditor:Auditor:

#REF!

#REF! #REF!

The improvement program will be presented at the day of visit during the closing meeting and handed over as a pre-copy of the report. Theaudited organization is required to create effective actions to close the identified weaknesses and put them into operational practice.

We point out that in this audit the processes are only verified by conducted sample inspections. It is the responsibility of the audited organization(departements) to further investigate and create and spread actions for similiar issues.

I ,


9/17

Prozessaudit 9/17

Duns-No: 0 Supl. -No: Order/contract:

Auditor

I. Concretion and timing of the improvement program (14 days )

Date

Improvement program received

Activities

Qualification Time Schedule

Supplier Mgmt.

Time schedule (supplier)

II. Realization of the improvement program incl. confirmation and timing of self assessment ( 12 weeks )

III. Self-assessment according to VDA 6.3 ( 10 weeks ) (classification "B" or "C" only )

Notice

Measures have to be implemented immediately. Large improvement programs can be subdivided into several realization/ implementationphases.

Self-assessment: In order to allow us to evaluate the self-assessment we ask for information about the audit days (man days) and thequalification of the used auditors. We assume that the required audit time is at least equivalent in audit days to a certification audit. Afterreceipt and review of the documents - if the result is classified as "A" - we will agree on a new audit date. If the result is classified as "B" wewill ask you for realistic timing to achieve an "A" classification. We expect you then to send the audit report of the internal follow-up audit on-time, without further notification from us.

I ,


10/17

Prozessaudit

Action plan

Supplier: Contract-NoLocation: Date:

to be completed by auditor to be completed by organizatio

Pos.

Ques.

No.

Weaknesses / recommended

activities, findingPoints Actions and root cause analysis

TimingRespo

sibilit

P2 Project management

2.1 0 n.b.2.2 entry text n.b.2.3 entry text n.b.2.4 entry text n.b.2.5 entry text n.b.2.6 entry text n.b.2.7 entry text n.b.

P3 Planning of the product- and process development

3.1 entry text n.b.,n.b.3.2 entry text n.b.,n.b.3.3 entry text n.b.,n.b.3.4 entry text n.b.,n.b.3.5 entry text n.b.,n.b.

P4 Carrying out the product- and process development

4.1 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.2 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.3 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.4 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.5 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.6 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.7 entry text n.b.,n.b.

4.8 entry text n.b.,n.b.4.9 entry text n.b.,n.b.

07/11/


11/17

Prozessaudit

Action plan

Supplier: Contract-

Location: Date:

to be completed by auditor to be completed by

Pos.

Ques.

No.



Timing

P5 Supplier management5.1 entry text n.b.5.2 entry text n.b.

5.3 entry text n.b.5.4 entry text n.b.

5.5 entry text n.b.5.6 entry text n.b.5.7 entry text n.b.

P6 Process analysis / Production

6.1 What goes into the process? Process input

6.1.1 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.1.2 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.1.3 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.1.4 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.1.5 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.2 Work content / Process sequences (are all production processes controlled)


12/17

Prozessaudit

Action plan


to be completed by auditor to be completed by organiza

Pos.

Ques.

No.



TimingRes

sib

07/

6.2.6 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.


13/17

Prozessaudit

Action plan

Supplier: Contra

Location: Date:

to be completed by auditor to be completed b

Pos.

Ques.

No.



Timi

6.3 Process support / Personell resources

6.3.1 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.3.2 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.3.3 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.4 Material resources

6.4.1 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.4.2 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.4.3 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.4.4 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.5 Process effectiveness (integrate effectivness, efficiency and elimination of waste)

6.5.1 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

b b b b


14/17

Prozessaudit

Action plan


to be completed by auditor to be completed by organi

Pos.

Ques.

No.



TimingR

s

0

6.6.3 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

6.6.4 entry text

n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.

,n.b.,n.b.,n.b.,n.b

.,n.b.,n.b.

P7 Customer support / Customer satisfaction / Service

7.1 entry text n.b.

7.2 entry text n.b.

7.3 entry text n.b.

7.4 entry text n.b.

7.5 entry text n.b.

7.6 entry text n.b.


15/17

Prozessaudit Sofortm. 15/17

Contract-No.:

Location: Date:

Pos.

Ques-

tion


activities, findingPoints Actions and root cause

analysis of the supplier

Assessment

realization

plant (in%)

TimingRespon-

sibilityComment

Immediate actions of the organization to ensure product quality

to be completed by auditor

Supplier:

07/11/14

to be completed by organization

I ,


16/17


Contract-No.:

Location: Date:

Pos.

Ques-

tion




Assessment

realization

plant (in%)

TimingRespon-

sibilityComment



Supplier:

07/11/14


Signatures:

I ,


17/17


Contract-No.:

Location: Date:

Pos.

Ques-

tion




Assessment

realization

plant (in%)

TimingRespon-

sibilityComment



Supplier:

07/11/14


Plant mgmt. Quality mgmt.Production mgmt.Date

I ,

VDA 63 Auditbericht VersR9 P3 Ext Engl

Documents

Transcript of VDA 63 Auditbericht VersR9 P3 Ext Engl