VCE Legal Studies Murder. 2 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012 1. What is sentencing? What laws guide...
-
Upload
alban-bell -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of VCE Legal Studies Murder. 2 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012 1. What is sentencing? What laws guide...
2 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
1. What is sentencing?
What laws guide a judge when sentencing?
What types of sentences can be given in Victoria?
Pho
to: J
ohn
Fre
nch
/ Cou
rtes
y of
The
Age
Chief Justice Marilyn Warren of the Supreme Court of Victoria
3 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Who is responsible for sentencing?
In Australia, responsibility for sentencing is spread between
three groups
Parliament ~ makes the laws ~
Government~ puts laws into operation ~
Courts ~ interpret the laws ~
Creates offences and decides what the maximum penalties will be
Makes the rules the courts must apply to cases
Sets up punishments for judges and magistrates to use
Apply the law within the framework set up by parliament
Set specific sentences for individual offenders
Correctional authorities (e.g. prisons) – control offenders after sentencing
Adult Parole Board – supervises offenders who are on parole
4 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Where is sentencing law found?
• Sentencing Act 1991
• Children, Youth and Families Act 2005
• Common law – previous court judgements
• Various Acts and Regulations creating particular offences, e.g.:
–Crimes Act 1958 deals with a range of crimes including injury offences
–Road Safety Act 1986 deals with offences related to driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
5 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Types of sentences
imprisonment
drug treatment order (max 2 years)
suspended sentence of imprisonment (max 3 years – higher courts; 2 years – Magistrates’ Court)
community correction order
fine
adjourned undertaking
Most severe
Least severe
6 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
2. Sentencing theory
What must a judge consider when deciding what sentence to impose?
Source: Victorian Sentencing Manual, Judicial College of Victoria
7 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Purposes of sentencing
These are the ONLY purposes for which sentences might be given
Sentencing Act 1991, s 5(1)
PURPOSES OF SENTENCING
Protect the community Deterrence
RehabilitationDenunciate
Fair punishment
8 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Principle of parsimony
Sentencing Act 1991, ss 5(3), 5(4), 5(6), 5(7)
Judges should choosethe most straight-forwardsolution when sentencing
Parsimony~ taking extreme care in using resources ~
If a choice of punishmentexists a judge should take care to choose the least
severe option that will achieve the purposes of sentencing
Example If there is a choice between imposing a fine or a community correction order, a
fine should be imposed
9 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Factors that must be considered
Maximum penalty& current sentencing
practice
Type of offence& how serious
Offender’sdegree of
responsibility& culpability
VictimAggravating or
mitigatingfactors
Relevant Actsof Parliament& statistical
data
Factors making the crime worse, intention, effects, method, motive,
weapons,role the offender
played
Prior offences,age, gender,race, culture,
character, mentalstate, alcohol,
drugs, gambling,personal crisis,
guilty plea
Impact of crimeon victim (e.g.psychological
or physicaltrauma), materialor financial loss
Factors thatincrease orlessen the
seriousnessof the crime
Victim impactstatement
Sentencing Act 1991, s 5(2AC(2))
Factors that must be considered when sentencing
10 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Victim impact statements
• If a court finds a person guilty, a victim of the offence may make a victim impact statement
• A victim impact statement contains details of any injury, loss or damage suffered by the victim as a direct result of the offence
• A person who has made a VIS can request that it be read aloud during the sentencing hearing
11 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
How long is a sentence really?
Cumulative or concurrent?• Cumulative sentences are sentences for two or more crimes
that run one after the other e.g. 2 x 5-year prison sentences served cumulatively = 10 years in prison
• Concurrent sentences are sentences for two or more crimes that run at the same time e.g. 2 x 5-year prison sentences served concurrently = 5 years in prison
• The head sentence is the sentence given for each crime before a non-parole period is set
• The total effective sentence (TES) is the total sentence for all crimes once they have been made cumulative or concurrent
12 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Non-parole period
• Non-parole period is set by the court and is the part of the sentence the offender has to serve in prison before being eligible for parole
• A non-parole period must be fixed for sentences of 2 years or more
• A non-parole period may be fixed for sentences of 1–2 years
• A non-parole period cannot be fixed for sentences of less than 1 year
• Parole is the release of a prisoner before the end of a sentence, subject to certain conditions (e.g. regular reporting to parole officer), to help him or her settle back into the community
13 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
3. The crime and the time
What is ‘murder' and what is the maximum
penalty?
Photo: Trevor Poultney
14 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Murder
Maximum penalty
• A person who intentionally causes the death of another person is guilty of the indictable offence of murder
• Level 1 imprisonment (life)
• or imprisonment for such other term as is fixed by the court
Crimes Act 1958, s 3
15 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Murder - People sentenced
37
23
19
25 251
1
0 1
1
0
20
40
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Nu
mb
er o
f p
eop
le
Male (n = 129) Female (n = 4)
16 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Total effective sentence & non-parole period
19y 1m19y 5m
20y
19y 2m 22y 3m
15y 6m15y
16y 2m
14y 6m 18y 3m
0
48
96
144
192
240
288
2005–06 2006–07 2007–08 2008-09 2009-10
Mo
nth
s
Average TES length Average non-parole period
18 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
The offender
• Tony Prior is a 22-year old man and was 20 at the time of the offence
• He is described as placid and easygoing
• Over 3-4 years Prior became morbidly obsessed about death and committing murder
• He has a verbal IQ of 71 and failed at school
• Since leaving school he has been a successful cabinet maker
• He has been found guilty of one count of murder
19 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
The crime 1
• Tony Prior and his good friend Brook Tanner were drinking beer at a mutual friend’s place
• Prior produced a hunting knife he had earlier stolen and told his friends that he needed it for protection
• Soon after Prior and Tanner returned to their own flat
• In an unprovoked attack, Prior stabbed Tanner a number of times
• Tanner broke free and staggered out onto the road where passers-by administered first aid and called an ambulance
• Meanwhile Prior slashed his own throat and wrists and stabbed himself in the chest
20 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
The crime 2
• He then called 000, saying that he needed serious help and that he had tried killing a friend with a knife
• Prior showed no concern for the fate of his friend but concentrated on his own predicament
• Meanwhile police and ambulance had arrived in response to the calls of passers-by
• Tanner died in hospital an hour later
• Prior was treated for his wounds in hospital and underwent psychiatric examinations
21 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
Factors for consideration
• Prior pleaded guilty as soon as it was determined that he was not mentally impaired
• From the age of 15 Prior downloaded grotesque and depraved images and materials from the internet
• At all times Prior frankly admitted responsibility for his actions and never blamed alcohol and drugs for his actions
• Despite his difficulties at school, Prior’s teachers found him polite and easy to deal with
• Prior is single and has a full-time job
• He has no previous convictions
• He has expressed remorse, albeit qualified, for his actions
22 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
5. The sentence
What sentence would you give?
Photo: Department of Justice
23 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
You decide …
What sentence would you give?• If imprisonment, what would be the head sentence and
non-parole period?
• If a partially suspended sentence, what would be the length of sentence and operational period?
• If a totally suspended sentence, what would be the length of sentence and operational period?
24 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
The maximum penalty
MurderA person who intentionally causes the death of another person is guilty of the indictable offence of murder, which carries the maximum penalty of:
• Level 1 imprisonment (life)
• or imprisonment for such other term as is fixed by the court
Tony Prior, guilty of one count of murder, could receive:
• a possible maximum of imprisonment for life
Crimes Act 1958, s 3
25 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
What the trial judge decided
Tony Prior’s case, Supreme Court • Count: Murder 20 years’ imprisonment
• Non-parole period 15 years
• Already served The 671 days Prior had already spent in prison are
to be reckoned as served under the sentence
Trial judge’s comment‘...it is important that the sentence that is imposed on you be sufficient to constitute an appropriate denunciation by this Court of your crime, and to properly uphold the sanctity of human life in our community. It is also necessary that the sentence which is imposed on you be of sufficient magnitude to deter other like-minded persons from resorting to lethal violence to satisfy their violent impulses. In addition, it is necessary to impose a sentence which will be sufficiently long to enable you, hopefully, to gain appropriate insight into your wrongdoing, and into the underlying causes which precipitated you into the events of that fateful night.’
26 Sentencing Advisory Council, 2012
6. Conclusion
Effective sentencing achieves a balance between the interests of society, the concerns of the victim and the best interests of the offender.
The more information society has about crimes and the people involved in them, the more reasonable it is in its demands about sentencing.
Photo: Department of Justice