VAP CRBSI Collaborative - Canadian Patient Safety...
Transcript of VAP CRBSI Collaborative - Canadian Patient Safety...
VAP CRBSI Collaborative
Informational CallsHosted by Canadian ICU Collaborative
November 18 and 20, 2008
November 2008 2
Purpose
• By the end of this call, participants will have:– Better understanding of topics, methods and
expectations associated with the Collaborative approach
– Questions answered
November 2008 4
Why these Topics?
• The Gap: Evidence vs. Practice– International– Canadian
• Canadian ICU Collaborative• Safer Healthcare Now!• Accreditation Canada• Provincial expectations
November 2008 5
BRUCE - INSERT DATA
Rat
e pe
r 10
00 V
entil
ator
Day
sVAP Rates - National Data - September, 2008
Source: Safer Healthcare Now ! Quarterly Reports - September 2008
Individuals
UCL = 18.1
Mean = 10.6
LCL = 3.1
UCL = 8.0
Mean = 5.7
LCL = 3 .3
Nov'05
Dec'05
Jan'0
6Feb
"06Mar'
06Apr'
06May
'06Ju
n'06
Jul'06
Aug'06
Sep'06
Oct'06
Nov'06
Dec'06
Jan'0
7Feb
'07Mar'
07Apr'
07May
'07Ju
n'07
Jul'07
Aug'07
Sep'07
Oct'07
Nov'07
Dec'07
Jan'0
8Feb
'08Mar'
08Apr'
08May
'08Ju
n'08
Jul'08
Aug'08
Sep'08
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
November 2008 6
Rat
e pe
r 10
00 L
ine
Day
sCLI Rates - National Data - September, 2008
Source: Safer Healthcare Now ! Quarterly Reports - September 2008
Individuals
UCL = 7.3
Mean = 2.9
UCL = 4.0
Mean = 2.0
LCL = 0.0
Nov'05
Dec'05
Jan'0
6Feb
"06Mar'
06Apr'
06May
'06Ju
n'06
Jul'06
Aug'06
Sep'06
Oct'06
Nov'06
Dec'06
Jan'0
7Feb
'07Mar'
07Apr'
07May
'07Ju
n'07
Jul'07
Aug'07
Sep'07
Oct'07
Nov'07
Dec'07
Jan'0
8Feb
'08Mar'
08Apr'
08May
'08Ju
n'08
Jul'08
Aug'08
Sep'08
0
2
4
6
8
10
November 2008 9
Reduction of Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections
A Canadian National PICU Collaborative Experience
October 2004 to December 2007
T. Northway, RN, MSN, BC Children’s Hospital;E. Folz, RN, BScN, Alberta Children’s Hospital; M. Golberg, RN, BScN, NP, Stollery Children’s Hospital;J. Plouffe, RN, BScN, NP, Winnipeg Children’s Hospital
November 2008 10
What is the Canadian ICU Collaborative?
• Like-minded ICU care providers & quality improvement experts
• Focused on improving patient outcomes• ICU specific content*• Accountable to each other for results• Funded through Canadian Patient Safety
Institute and unencumbered grants through private business
* Partner with hospital programs for spread of some initiatives
November 2008 11
http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/Improvement/ImprovementMethods/HowToImprove/
Improvement Methodology
November 2008 12
• a collection of processes needed to effectively care for patients undergoing particular treatments with risks.
• bundle together scientifically grounded elements to improve clinical outcomes (4-5). • to be kept together…
What is a “Bundle?”
November 2008 14
Incidence of CRBSI
• Comparatively high rate of CRBSI in PICU (NNIS 6.6/1000 CVC line days)
• CDC reports 5.3/1000 CVC line days adult ICU• Attributable cost approximately $34,500-$56,000
US• Increased LOS (3 weeks)• Estimated mortality rate 13% - 19% (child) & 12% -
25% (adult)
oElward, A et al. (2005). Pediatrics 115(4), 868-872.o(2007) http://www.edwards.com/Products/CentralVenous/VantexInservice.htm?wbc_purpose=Basic&WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublishedoSlonim, A et. Al (2001). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2, 170-174.oYogaraj, J. et al. (2002). Pediatrics 110(3), 481-485.
November 2008 15
Aim and Goals/Objectives
• Aim:To reduce the incidence of catheter related
blood stream infections (CRBSI) within Canadian PICUs
• Goals/Objectives:To reduce the incidence of CRBSIs by 20% to
50% within 12 months (October 2005)
November 2008 16
CRBSI Improvement Bundles
Insertion Bundle• Hand Hygiene• Maximum Barrier Precautions
(Inserter & Patient)• Chlorhexidine for Skin Prep• Site selection
Maintenance Bundle• Hand Hygiene• Standardized Hub Antisepsis • Standardized Accessing of Line
– Line set-up– Accessing hubs– Dressing & tubing changes
• Daily Reviewing of Line Necessity
November 2008 17
Changes Tested
A P
S D
AP
SD
A P
S D
D S
P A
A P
S D
AP
SD
A P
S D
D S
P A
Specif
ic Te
stCyc
les
BaselineStream
EducationStream
Establish current reality
Adoption of insertion& maintenance bundles
Adoption of CDC definition
Handwashing campaign
Moving to a culture of safety
Celebrating successes!
Developing staff clinical champions
Increased understanding ofICU Collaborative & process
Awareness of current reality
Awareness of importanceOf CVC infections
Creating controversy through transparency!
November 2008 18
A P
S D
AP
SD
A P
S D
D S
P A
A P
SD
AP
SD
AP
S D
D S
P A
Specif
ic Te
stCyc
les
Changes TestedChanges Tested
InsertionStream
MaintenanceStream
Creation of insertion bundle•Hand hygiene•Full barrier precautions•Site selection•Cleansing solution change
Standardize equipment:Creation of vascular access tray
Standardize equipment:Creation of line insertion cart
Create line insertion checklist
Culture shift: RNs halting insertionif insertion bundle violated
LetLet’’s make it easy to do the right thing & difficult to do the wrongs make it easy to do the right thing & difficult to do the wrong thing!thing!
Daily Goal Sheet to review line necessity
Standardized data collection
CVC Maintenance Bundle:•Hand hygiene•Line set-up (closed system)•Dressing & tubing changes• Standardized cleansing solution
CVC maintenance OSCE station at annual RN
competency validation days
November 2008 19
Collaborative Results
Canadian PICU Collaborative CRBSI National Rates
7.0
3.0
10.0
4.0
3.0
1.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
1.0
5.0
7.0
3.0
6.0
2.0
6.0
0.0
6.0
3.0
4.0
7.0
4.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
6.0
0.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
3.0
4.0
6.0
3.03.0
5.0
2.02.0
7.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Sep-04
Oct-04
Nov-04
Dec-04
Jan-0
5Feb
-05Mar-
05Apr-
05May
-05Ju
n-05
Jul-0
5Aug
-05Sep
-05Oct-
05Nov
-05Dec
-05Ja
n-06
Feb-06
Mar-06
Apr-06
May-06
Jun-0
6Ju
l-06
Aug-06
Sep-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Dec-06
Jan-0
7Feb
-07Mar-
07Apr-
07May
-07Ju
n-07
Jul-0
7Aug
-07Sep
-07Oct-
07Nov
-07Dec
-07
Date
Mon
thly
Inci
denc
e
Cum
ulat
ive
Rat
e pe
r 100
0 Li
ne D
ays
Monthly IncidenceRate/1000 Line Days
November 2008 20
Lessons Learned
• Culture shifting “Finding Religion”• Adapting to improvement process is difficult
– Orientate team on improvement process…Research vs Improvement Process
• Maintaining the momentum is challenging due to time limitations, fiscal constraints & fatigue
Benefit of collaborating nationally is immeasurable!http://www.visualsunlimited.com/images/watermarked/161/1616.jpg
November 2008 21
Evidence to support practice changes:
• Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Lipset PA, et al. (2004). Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infection in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 32. pp 2014-2020.
• Block, M. (2008). Update: Catheter-related bloodstream infection rates in relation to clinical practice and needleless device type. Fall. pp 156-162
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for the prevention of Intravascular Catheter- Related Infections MMWR 2002; 51 No. RR-10
• Chaiyakunapruk Nathorn,; Veenstra David L.; Lipsky Benjamin A.; and Saint Sanjay. (2002). Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter–site care: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 136. pp. 792-801.
• Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P et al. (1997). Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 25:1417-24.
November 2008 22
Evidence to support practice changes:
• Costello, J., Morrow, D., Graham, D., Potter-Bynoe, G., Sandora, T. & Laussen, P. (2008). Systemic intervention to reduce central line–associated bloodstream infection rates in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Pediatrics, 121(5), 915-923
• Eggimann, Philippe, Harbarth, Stephan, Constantin, Marie-Noëlle, Touveneau, Sylvie, Chevrolet Jean-Claude, Pittet Didier, Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care THE LANCET, Vol 355, May 27, 2000
• Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ. Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet. 1991;338(8763):339-343
• McCarthy MC, Shives JK, Robison RJ, Broadie TA. Prospective evaluation of single and triple lumen catheters in total parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987 May-Jun;11(3):259-262.
November 2008 23
Evidence to support practice changes:
• Mermel LA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. Am J Med. 1991;91(3B):197S-205S.
• Michie, S., et al. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14, 26-33.
• Raad, II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;15(4 Pt 1):231-238.
• Snydman DR, Murray SA, Kornfeld SJ, Majka JA, Ellis CA. Total parental nutrition-related infections: prospective epidemiologic study using semi-quantitative methods. Am J Med 1982;73:695-9
November 2008 25
COMPLIANCE TO ELEMENTS OF THE BUNDLE
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
100,0
2001
2004
à 200
5-12 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
2005
à200
6-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1320
06à2
007-1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12
COM
PLIA
NCE
(%)
HOB Feeding Tubes SBT EVAC
SUMMER
EVAC 48H + ICU
EVAC ALL OR + ICU
FULL IMPLEMENTATION
SHNCOLLABORATIVE
November 2008 26
95% Goal
Line
INTERVENTION - VAP MEASURE:VAP Bundle Compliance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
nov-0
5dé
c-05
janv-0
6fév
r-06
mars-06
avr-0
6mai-
06jui
n-06
juil-06
août-
06se
pt-06
oct-0
6no
v-06
déc-0
6jan
v-07
févr-0
7mars
-07av
r-07
mai-07
juin-0
7jui
l-07
août-
07se
pt-07
oct-0
7no
v-07
déc-0
7jan
v-08
févr-0
8mars
-08av
r-08
mai-08
juin-0
8jui
l-08
août-
08se
pt-08
oct-0
8no
v-08
déc-0
8jan
v-09
févr-0
9mars
-09av
r-09
mai-09
juin-09
juil-0
9ao
ût-09
sept-
09oc
t-09
nov-0
9dé
c-09
Month
Perc
ent C
ompl
ianc
e
Local Team Nationa l Go al
November 2008 27
Evolution of VAP- all categories
11,5
7,3
15,4
10,2
5,8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2003-04 2006-07 20007-08
VA
P pe
r 100
0 vn
etila
tion-
days
cardiac surgery med-surg
↓43%
November 2008 28
11,5
14,4
12,7
7,3
15,4
5,9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009-7
VAP
/ 100
0 Ve
nt d
ays
VAP CARDIAC SURGERY
ORAL DECONTAMINATION
November 2008 31
Benefits of Participating (continued)
• Face-to-face Learning Sessions• Evidence-based changes, ready to test and implement• Coaching from experienced Faculty on application of changes• Education and training on tools for improvement and
measurement• Advice on targeted strategies to overcome resistance and
address barriers• Monthly feedback on progress from the Collaborative Faculty• Monthly conference calls specific to challenges your team is
facing• A website for storing and sharing your documents with others• A comprehensive Improvement Guide with examples,
checklists, tools• No cost to join!
November 2008 32
Expectations for Participating Teams
• Commitment of a team sponsor• Full participation of a multidisciplinary team• Development of measures• Regular reporting of progress to the Faculty• Willingness and commitment to implement
rapid and widespread changes• Desire to innovate• Regular access to email and Internet
November 2008 3333
Timelines
Learning Session
One
Learning Session
One
Learning Session
Two
Learning Session
Two
Learning Session
Three
Learning Session
Three
Support
Planning & Pre-work
Action Period One Action Period Two
Distribute Findings
A
S
P
D
A
S
P
D
Action Period Three
A
S
P
D
Enrolment Deadline
November 28
Pre-Work Calls
December
January 15-16
April 27-28
Oct TBD
Dec
November 2008 37
Enrollment Package & Questionnaire
VAP-CRBSI Collaborative Enrolment Questionnaire
Please complete and e-mail this information to Ardis Eliason, Project Coordinator at [email protected] 1. Key Contact
Organization
Contact Name
Title
Address
Phone
Fax
2. Commitment: We wish to formally enroll in the Canadian ICU Collaborative. We have included a
Letter of Commitment from our senior leader. We agree to all the Expectations outlined in the Enrolment Package.
3. Briefly describe your organization, hospital or clinic (including type, size, patient population and
structure).
November 2008 38
Planning Team
• Dr. Claudio Martin, Collaborative [email protected]
• Cynthia Majewski [email protected]
• Clara [email protected]
• Bruce [email protected]
• Leanne [email protected]
• Ardis [email protected]
November 2008 39
Faculty
• Ms. Paule Bernier, P.Dt., MSc, Sir MB Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal
• Dr. Paul Boiteau, Department Head, Critical Care Medicine, Calgary Health Region; Professor of Medicine, University of Calgary
• Dr. David Creery, Head, Paediatric Intensive Care, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa
• Ms. Rosmin Esmail, BSc, MSc• Mr. Gordon Krahn, BSc, RRT, Quality and Research Coordinator, BC
Children’s Hospital• Dr Denny Laporta, Chief, Department of Adult Critical Care; Director,
Respiratory Therapy, Sir MB Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal• Ms. Debbie Lynch, RN, ICP, Eastern Health, St. John’s• Dr. John Muscedere, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Queens University;
Intensivist, Kingston General Hospital• Ms. Tracie Northway, RN, MSN, Quality & Safety Leader, Critical Care
Program, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver• Ms. Kim Rafuse, RN, BN, DOHN, ICP Annapolis Valley Annapolis Valley
District Health Authority • Dr. Peter Skippen, Division Head & Medical Director, Pediatric ICU, BC
Children’s Hospital, Vancouver