Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_...

27
HEC MONTR ´ EAL Canada Research Chair Centre for Research on e-finance in Risk Management IFM — Institute de Finance CIRP ´ EE Mathematique de Montreal Third International Conference on Credit and Operational Risk Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk, for the Energy Industry Ehud I. Ronn Professor of Finance University of Texas at Austin 1 Montr´ eal, April 13, 2007 1 [email protected] and (512) 471-5853

Transcript of Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_...

Page 1: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

HEC MONTREAL Canada Research ChairCentre for Research on e-finance in Risk Management

IFM — Institute de Finance CIRPEEMathematique de Montreal

Third International Conference on Credit and OperationalRisk

Valuation of Credit Derivatives,and Credit Value-at-Risk,for the Energy Industry

Ehud I. RonnProfessor of Finance

University of Texas at Austin1

Montreal, April 13, 2007

[email protected] and (512) 471-5853

Page 2: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

OVERVIEW

• Objective of Credit Value-at-Risk (CVAR): Quantify-ing and Optimizing Counterparty Credit Exposure, Ac-counting for both Market and Credit Risks

• CVAR I: Credit Exposure at Risk — Calculating theMagnitude of Counterparty Exposure

• CVAR II:

1. Evaluating and Optimizing Counterparties Credit Line

2. Quantifying Credit Risk Insurance

3. Using CVAR to Evaluate a Differentially-Priced Tradewith Two Counterparties of Different Credit Rating

• CVAR III: Credit Value-at-Risk

• CVAR IV: Combining Market and Credit Risks

• Summary

2

Page 3: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR I: “Credit Exposure at Risk” —Evaluating Current and Prospective

Counterparty Exposure

1. Model all relevant forward prices for given portfolio:

∆Fi = Fiσiεit

Var (∆Fi) = F 2i σ2

itt (1)

Cov (∆Fi, ∆Fj) = FiFjρijσitσjtt

where

Fi = price of ith futures contract

σit = volatility of ith futures contract for maturity t

εit = is a Normally distributed random variable with zero

mean and standard deviation equal to√

t

ρij = Corr (ln Fi, ln Fj)

2. Incorporate option contracts on forward/futures contract i

3. Compute portfolio basis for the given counterparty:

ni = number of futures contracts held long (and the coun-

terparty is consequently short)

Fi0 = basis for i-th futures contract

Basis = K =∑

iniFi0

Current Portfolio Value = P0 =∑

iniFi

3

Page 4: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR I: “Credit Exposure at Risk”(Cont’d)

Under full netting procedures, the current exposure Π0 to the coun-

terparty is

Π0 =∑

ini (Fi − Fi0) ≡ P0 −K, (2)

of which the current credit risk exposure is given by

max {P0 −K, 0} .

4. Model Forward Volatility and compute Portfolio Volatility to date t :

dΠ =∑

iNi dFi

=⇒ Var (∆Π) =∑

i

jNiNjFiFjρijσitσjtt ≡ σ2

Ptt

5. Compute Month t Credit Exposure at Risk: Define for each coun-

terparty the date t Credit Exposure at Risk, CERt :2

CERt =

Π0 + ασPt

√t if Π0 ≥ 0

max{Π0 + ασPt

√t, 0

}if Π0 < 0

(3)

6. Finally, define the counterparty’s exposure at risk, CER, as

CER ≡ maxt

CERt, (4)

meaning that we would seek, for each counterparty, that date at

which maximal 95th-percentile (α) exposure currently occurs.

2When Π0 < 0 — because the current counterparty exposure is in the

counterparty’s favor, i.e., Π0 ≡ ∑i ni (Fi − Fi0) < 0 — then CERt =

max{Π0 + ασPt

√t, 0

}.

4

Page 5: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR I: Numerical Example

• Continuing with the previous numerical example, set

N1 = N2 = 1; σ1 = 30%; σ2 = 25%; P1 = $26; P2 = $27

• The dollar variance is

Var (P1 + P2) = P 21 σ2

1 + P 22 σ2

2 + 2ρ12σ1σ2P1P2

= 262 × 0.32 + 272 × 0.252

+ 2× 0.6× 0.3× 0.25× 26× 27 = ($13.02)2 ,

with the dollar variance for the first month given by 13.022/12

• Consequently, at the 95-th percentile,

CER1/12 = 1.645× 13.02×√1/12 = $6.183

• Suppose now the term vols for the second month are

σ1 = 35%; σ2 = 30%,

respectively. Then the dollar variance for the first two-months is

Var (P1 + P2) ∆t =(P 2

1 σ21 + P 2

2 σ22 + 2ρ12σ1σ2P1P2

)∆t

=(262 × 0.352 + 272 × 0.32

+ 2× 0.6× 0.35× 0.3× 26× 27) (1/6)

= ($15.39)2 (1/6)

which in turns renders CER1/6 at the 95-th percentile equal to

CER1/6 = 1.645× 15.39×√1/6 = $10.34

• If, however, Contract 1 matures at month 1, then

Var (P2) ∆t =(P 2

2 σ22

)∆t =

(272 × 0.32

)(1/6) = ($8.16)2 (1/6) ,

which in turn would render CER1/6 at the 95-th percentile equal to

CER1/6 = 1.645× 8.16×√1/6 = $5.48

5

Page 6: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR ICVAR ICredit Exposure @ Risk Credit Exposure @ Risk –– CP 1CP 1

Page 7: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR ICVAR ICER Profile Graph CER Profile Graph –– CP 1CP 1

Page 8: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR ICVAR ICredit Exposure @ Risk Credit Exposure @ Risk –– CP 2CP 2

Page 9: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR ICVAR ICER Profile Graph CER Profile Graph –– CP 2CP 2

Page 10: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR ICVAR ICredit Exposure @ Risk Credit Exposure @ Risk –– CP 3CP 3

Page 11: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR ICVAR ICER Profile Graph CER Profile Graph –– CP 3CP 3

Page 12: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

Intuitive Appeal of “Credit Exposure at Risk”

• The advantages of CER thus defined is that it captures three im-

portant features:

1. The current “moneyness” of the exposure, Π

2. The riskiness of that exposure, σPt

3. The effect of time t

thus justifying the definition of the term as “Credit Exposure at

Risk.”

• For counterparties with identical credit risk, eq. (4)’s CER con-

stitutes the mechanism for credit allocation across counterparties:

Specifically, for counterparties assessed to have the same level of

credit quality, the CER should be equalized across these clients.

• In sum, the inputs required for the Credit Exposure at Risk model

include:

1. Financial Environment: Prices of futures contracts; prices

of option contracts; times to maturity of futures and options;

volatilities of futures contracts; correlations across futures con-

tracts

2. Counterparty Data: Number of futures contracts; number and

exercise prices of option contracts; initial values of futures and

option contracts

12

Page 13: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

An (Important and Relevant) Interpretationof the Black-Scholes Formula

• As is well-known, the payoff on a call option is

max {S −K, 0} .

• The value of an option today, T years prior to expiration, is given

by the discounted present value of the expectation E (·) :3

e−rTE (max {S −K, 0}) ,

where the result of that expectation is the Black-Scholes formula:

e−rTE (max {S −K, 0}) = SN(d)−Ke−rTN(d− σ√

T )

= Black-Scholes Formula

This result is valuable, in that it permits an evaluation of the value

of credit insurance, and its dependence on the

• Moneyness,

• Volatility, and

• Default sensitivity

of the counterparty portfolio

3Technically, this expectation obtains under the so-called “risk-

neutral” distribution.

13

Page 14: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR II: 1. Evaluating and OptimizingCounterparties Credit Line

2. Quantifying Credit Risk Insurance

1. As before, assume we have calculated

Var (∆P ) =∑

i

jNiNjFiFjρijσitσjtt.

Make the transition to a LogNormal distribution solving for σPt

from

Var (∆P ) = σ2PtP

2t

2. Let p be defined as the marginal probability to default at a given

point in time in the future, conditional on not having previously

defaulted. Suppose that probability to default follows its own dif-

fusion process,

dp

p= σp dzp, that is, p is LogNormally distributed (5)

where we allow for a correlation between Π0 and p:

ρ ≡ Corr (dzp, dzP )

3. Conditional on the event of default at date t, let the recovery rate

per promised date t dollar be given by the known parameter value

of α (which parameter can be made random, or dependent on the

ratings category, as in αratings category)

14

Page 15: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

The Normal and LogNormal Distributions:An Interpretation using theNumerical Example (Cont’d)

• Consider the previous analysis that pertained to a portfolio

composed of Contract 1 and Contract 2

• Although the sum (a portfolio) of LogNormal random variables

is not LogNormal, we approximate that portfolio as LogNormal

– What is the dollar variance of a portfolio of P1 and P2?

Var (P1 + P2) = P 21 σ2

1 + P 22 σ2

2 + 2ρ12σ1σ2P1P2

= 262 × 0.32 + 272 × 0.252

+ 2× 0.6× 0.3× 0.25× 26× 27 = ($13.02)2

– What is the value of the portfolio?

Π = P1 + P2 = 26 + 27 = $53

– Consequently, what LogNormal variance is implied?

(P1 + P2)2 σ2

Π = P 21 σ2

1 + P 22 σ2

2 + 2ρ12σ1σ2P1P2

=⇒ σΠ =

√√√√√√P 2

1 σ21 + P 2

2 σ22 + 2ρ12σ1σ2P1P2

(P1 + P2)2

= 24.57%

15

Page 16: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR II: Counterparty Credit Line and

Credit Risk Insurance (Cont’d)

4. In CVAR II, we extend the analysis of CVAR I by considering, for each ofthe firm’s counterparties, the (random) exposure given by4

Default, Partial Recovery at rate α with probability pt

0 with probability 1 − pt

5. Let Vt be the current value of that risk exposure. Then,

Vt = (1 − α) e−rtE [max {pt (Pt − K) , 0}]= (1 − α) e−rtpt

[P0e

ρσptσPttN (d) − KN(d − σPt

√t)]

(6)

where

E (pP ) = E (p) E (P ) + Cov (p, P ) = ptP0eρσptσPtt

d ≡log(P0/K) + ρσptσPtt

σPt

√t

+ 12σPt

√t

Scaled up by 1−α, Vt is simply the current value of an option with a future

random payoff ptPt and a random exercise price ptK

6. With the above, we compute ∑

tVt, (7)

where the∑

t operator captures the probability and cost of default across

all maturities.

This has the dual interpretation of:

(a) The number, across all ratings category, to be set as the appropriate

credit line for the firm’s counterparties

(b) The no-arbitrage value of default-risk insurance for the specific coun-

terparty

4With no default, the cost of the exposure is zero.

16

Page 17: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

Numerical Example of CVAR II

Assume the data of the previous numerical example. In addition, assume:

T = 1 : Maturity of futures contract with Counterparty 1

r = 5% : One-year riskfree rate of interest

Now consider the following four possible states of nature at the end of the year:

Table 1 — Computing Default Risk Insurance whenDefault is Positively-Correlated with Asset Value

Current Futures Contract Value: $26

FuturesContract Recovery Proba- Payoff on Default

Case # Value1 Default Rate2 bility3 Insurance4

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) = (4) * [ (2) - 26 ]

1 $33 No NA 45% 0

2 $33 Yes 45% 5% 0.55 · (33 − 26)

3 $20 No NA 47% 0

4 $20 Yes NA 3% 0

Notes:

1. This is the futures contract value at its maturity date.

2. NA – Not Applicable, either because of No Default, or because Default occurredwhen Counterparty 1 had a positive, rather than negative, mark-to-market onthe contract

3. Note that default probability is positively correlated with Price: Default is morelikely to occur when the Counterparty’s mark-to-market is negative (5%), thanwhen it is positive (3%)

4. Payoff is positive only if default occurs when Counterparty 1 has a negativeMTM on the contract

Based on Table 1 and the one-year 5% rate of interest, the value of CVAR II is:

CVAR II = Prob. of Default × Payoff in the Event of Default

1 + Discount Rate

= .05 × 0.55 · (33 − 26)

1.05= $0.1833. (8)

17

Page 18: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR II: Estimating the Default Probablity Process

Direct Estimates of Default-Rate Volatilities

• Recall that the fundamental Default Prob. Equation is:

ln pt ∼ N (ln pt, σpt) , (9)

where the potential time-dependence enters through ln pt and σpt, andwhere the volatility σpt should be evaluated as of time 0.

• In CreditRisk+, Credit Suisse First Boston provides a table reporting one-

year default rate and volatilities (Section 2.6.4):

Credit One-Year Default Rate (%)

Rating Average (µ) Standard Deviation (σ)

Aaa 0.00 0.0

Aa 0.03 0.1A 0.01 0.0

Baa 0.12 0.3

Ba 1.36 1.3

B 7.27 5.1

1. Interpret the above statistics as evolving from a Normal, rather than

LogNormal, distribution: p ∼ N (µ, σ)

2. To convert these to the LogNormal (9) distribution we are using, note

that the Normal distribution is equivalent to Var(dp) = σ2, and the

LogNormal to Var(dp/ p) = σ2pt. Thus, the approximation we can use

is:

σ2pt ≡ Var

(dp

p

)=

p

)2∼=(σ

µ

)2.

3. Thus, the σpt is given by the ratio of the third column in the table

above divided by the second column

18

Page 19: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR II: Estimating the Recovery Rate

CreditRisk+ provides a table reporting recovery rates by seniority

and security (Section 2.6.5):

Standard

Seniority and Security Average (%) Deviation (%)

Senior Secured Bank Loan 71.18 21.09

Senior Secured Public 63.45 26.21

Senior Unsecured Public 47.54 26.29

Senior Subordinated Public Debt 38.28 24.74

Subordinated Public Debt 28.29 20.09

Junior Subordinated Public Debt 14.66 8.67

Source: Historical Default Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers,

1920 - 1996 (January 1997), Moody’s Investors Service Global

Credit Risk

19

Page 20: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

Computing CVAR II:Continuing Numerical Example

• Input Data:

Definition Notation Value

Time to Expiration T 1

Exercise Price K $53

Adjusted Forward Price FeρσpσP t $55.40

Forward Volatility σP 24.57%

Expected Default Rate p 7.5%

Default Volatility Rate σp 30%

Corr(Default, Prices) ρ 0.6

Recovery Rate α 0.45

Riskfree Rate r 5%

• Option Value:

C (F = $55.40, K = $53, σ = 24.57%, r = 5%, T = 1) = $6.26

• CVAR II Value is

(1 − α) pC = 0.55 × 0.075 × 6.26 = $0.2584

21

Page 21: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

Additional Application of CVAR II

Using CVAR II to Evaluate a Differentially-Priced Trade with Two

Counterparties

Variable Counterparty A Counterparty B

Time to maturity t = 1

Counterparty offer price FA0 = 95 FB0 = 96

Adjusted futures price P0eρσptσPtt 98.19 96.11

Riskfree rate r = 5%

Mid-point bid/ask F = 90

Futures vol σF = 55%

1− Recovery rate α = 0.45

Default prob pA = 10% pB = 1%

Default vol σpA = 20% σpB = 2%

Default corr ρA = 0.3 ρA = 0.1

Total vol σtA = 63.91% σtB = 57.0%

Insurance cost, Vt 1.459 0.126

Market + Insurance Costs 6.459 6.126

22

Page 22: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR III: Credit Value-at-Risk

• With∑

t Vt from CVAR II, we have

tdVt = P0

t

∂Vt

∂P0

dP0

P0+

t

∂Vt

∂ptpt

dpt

pt(10)

where∂Vt

∂P0= (1 − α) pte

ρPpσptσPttN (d)

∂Vt

∂pt=

Vt

pt

• For confidence level β (e.g., β = 1.65), the Value-at-Risk we seek

will be given by β√Var (dC) ∆t. In turn,

Var

tdVt

= P 2

0

t

∂Vt

∂P0

2

σ2P0 dt +

t

∂Vt

∂ptpt

2

σ2pt dt

+ 2∑

t

τ>t

∂Vt

∂pt

∂Vτ

∂pτpτpt Cov (ln pt, ln pτ ) dt

+ 2∑

t

τ>t

∂Vt

∂P0

∂Vτ

∂pτP0pτ Cov (ln P0, ln pτ ) dt (11)

where

σP0 = is the instantaneous, not term, vol of P0

Cov (ln pt, ln pτ ) = ρpt, pτσptσpτ

Cov (lnP0, ln pτ ) = ρPpσP0σpτ

• Interpretation of CVAR III: CVAR III quantifies — at, say, the 95-

th percentile — the potential deterioration of the value of CVAR II’s

C over the (exogenously specified) holding-period ∆t

23

Page 23: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR III: Numerical Example

• Implementing the Var(∆Vt) equation, we have:

∂Vt

∂P0= (1 − α) p ∆C = 0.55 × 0.075 × 0.5889 = .0243

∂Vt

∂pt= (1 − α) C = 0.55 × 11.13 = 6.12

Var (∆Vt) = P 20

∂Vt

∂P0

2

σ2P0 +

∂Vt

∂ptpt

2

σ2pt

+ 2∂Vt

∂P0

∂Vt

∂ptP0pt Cov (lnP0, ln pt)

= 532 × .02432 × 0.24572 + (3.445 × .075)2 × 0.32

+ 2 × 0.6 × 53 × .0243 × 0.2457 × 3.445 × .075 × 0.3

= (0.368)2

• For a one-week holding period ∆t = 1/52, CVAR III Value is

β√Var (∆Vt) ∆t = 1.645 × 0.368/

√52 = $0.084

24

Page 24: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR IV: VAR CombiningMarket and Credit Risks

• Consider the case of a portfolio containing a single forward contract:

Type of VAR Analytical Expression Comment

Market (Traditional VAR) 1.645 ×√

Var (∆F1)/ 52

Credit VAR (CVAR III) 1.645 ×√

Var (∆V )/ 52 V is the value

of CVAR II

CVAR IV 1.645 ×√

Var (∆V − ∆F1)/ 52

• Why Var (∆V − ∆F1)?

Consider a long position in a forward contract.

– An increase in market price reduces losses due to market but

increase potential losses due to credit

– A decrease in market price produces market losses but reduces

credit exposure

The converse applies for a short forward position.

Conclusion: Market and Credit VARs offset

25

Page 25: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

CVAR IV: Numerical Example

1. Per the numerical example, we seek

Var (∆V − ∆P0) = Var (∆V ) + Var (∆P0) − 2 Cov (∆V, ∆P0)

2. From CVAR III,

Var (∆Vt) = (0.368)2

3. Further

Var (∆P0) = (53 × 0.2457)2

4. We now require

Cov (∆V, ∆P0) = Cov

P0

∂Vt

∂P0

dP0

P0+

∂Vt

∂ptpt

dpt

pt, P0

dP0

P0

= P 20

∂Vt

∂P0σ2

P0 +∂Vt

∂ptptP0ρσpσP0

= 532 × 0.24572 × .0243

+ 3.445× .075 × 53 × .6 × .3 × .2457 = 4.726

5. Finally,

Var (∆V − ∆P0) = (0.368)2 + (53 × 0.2457)2 − 2 × 4.726 = (12.66)2

=⇒ CVAR IV = 1.645√Var (∆V − ∆P0) ∆t

= 1.645 × 12.66/√

52 = 2.888

26

Page 26: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

SUMMARY

• CVAR implementation can be done analytically

• CVARs can be computed for

– Credit Exposure at Risk (CVAR I)

– Credit Risk Insurance (CVAR II)

– Value-at-Risk computation (CVAR III) as well asVAR incorporating both market and credit risks(CVAR IV)

26

Page 27: Valuation of Credit Derivatives, and Credit Value-at-Risk ...web.hec.ca/croc2007/articles/Edhud_ I_ Ronn_pres.pdf · † The advantages of CER thus deflned is that it captures three

Appendix —

CVAR II: Estimating the Default Probablity Process

Indirect Estimates of Default-Rate Volatilities

This approach combines the use of year-by-year marginal default probabilitiespt together with transition-matrix values to determine the default volatilitiesσpt.

Average Cumulative Default Rates, Year 1 (%)AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC

0.00 0.00 0.06 0.18 1.06 5.20 19.79

One-Year Transition Probabilities for a BBB-Rated Borrower

Rating Probability

AAA 0.02%AA 0.33%A 5.95%

BBB 86.93%BB 5.3%B 1.17%

CCC / Default 0.12% + 0.18% = 0.3%

Notationally, let each probability in the above table be denoted qi, i =1, . . . , 7, and let each entry in the previous table be denoted p1i. That is,

[p11, p12, p13, p14, p15, p16, p17] = [0.00, 0.00, 0.06, 0.18, 1.06, 5.2, 19.79]

Then the calculation of p1 ≡ E (p1) , Var(p1) and Var(ln p1) for each monthin year 1 is given by:

p1 ≡ E (p1) =7∑

i=1qi

p1i

12

Var (p1) =7∑

i=1qi

(p1i

12− p1

)2/144

Var (ln p1) ∼= Var (p1)

p1≡ σ2

p1

28