validation presentation 07 11-13

22
Validation Tanya Osborne Quality Officer (Validation & Review)

description

Presentation outlining validation processes at the University of Northampton (QAP Northampton)

Transcript of validation presentation 07 11-13

Page 1: validation presentation 07 11-13

Validation

Tanya OsborneQuality Officer (Validation & Review)

Page 2: validation presentation 07 11-13

Overview

Developing Ideas

Types of Change

Validating a new programme

Why Do We Have These Processes?

Page 3: validation presentation 07 11-13

DEVELOPING IDEAS

Page 4: validation presentation 07 11-13

Timeliness

• Changes made by January

For changes to come into

affect the next academic year

• 2 year development at UG• 18 month development at PG• Schedule marketing time

For new Programmes

Page 5: validation presentation 07 11-13

Consultation

Students

Employers

Market Research

Page 6: validation presentation 07 11-13

Design

Benchmarks Competition Resources

PSRBs University Framework

Page 7: validation presentation 07 11-13

TYPES OF CHANGE

Page 8: validation presentation 07 11-13

What kinds of approval?

Change of Approval

Changes to existing

programmes

Validation

Entirely new programmes

Existing programmes

where substantial changes are being made

Deletion

End of lifecycle

Plans for students still on

programmes

Page 9: validation presentation 07 11-13

How do we decide?

Risk-based system

QAP advise teams on most appropriate course of action

Page 10: validation presentation 07 11-13

Exercise: What level of Approval do I need?

In pairs, discuss what kind of approval you think the following might need:

Change of Module Title

Change of Programme Title

Replacing all core modules

Adding a new core module

Page 11: validation presentation 07 11-13

Exercise: Answers

How many did you get correct?

Change of Module Title Change of Approval

Change of Programme Title Change of Approval

Replacing all core modules Validation

Adding a new core module Change of Approval

Page 12: validation presentation 07 11-13

VALIDATING A NEW PROGRAMME

Page 13: validation presentation 07 11-13

Why make new programmes?

New programme

Keep up-to-date with

current trends

Strategic enhancement of provision

Making most of staff

expertise

Page 14: validation presentation 07 11-13

Process

Development Approval

Form

School-Level Approval

Approval by University Executive

Committee

Page 15: validation presentation 07 11-13

Documentation

Rationale

Business Plan and Market Research

Curriculum Documents

Draft student-focused materials

Staff CVs

Reading Lists

Page 16: validation presentation 07 11-13

Event-based

Impartial Panel

Meet with the team over one

day

Set condition

s

Approval after

conditions met

Then goes to

PSR Cycle

Page 17: validation presentation 07 11-13

Collaborative

Follows event

structure

Additional steps

For more info

20 January “International Partnerships”

20 January “Partners”

Page 18: validation presentation 07 11-13

Future Developments

Greater emphasis on business plan and marketing

Streamlining of Change of Approval

Gradual move to Online Validation

Page 19: validation presentation 07 11-13

WHY DO WE HAVE THESE PROCESSES?

Page 20: validation presentation 07 11-13

Quality Assurance

QAA Quality Code Compliance

Ensure standards of programmes

Ensure internal compliance met

Page 21: validation presentation 07 11-13

Strategy

Promote healthy development

Ensure programmes are clear of their USP

Ensure programmes match University Strategy (RtB, Ashoka)

Page 22: validation presentation 07 11-13

Questions