Validation of turbidity products EuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter Session Observations...
-
Upload
nickolas-hawkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of Validation of turbidity products EuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter Session Observations...
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Antoine Mangin1, Seppo Kaitala2, Stéphane Maritorena3, Odile Fanton d’Andon1, and Philippe Garnesson1
(1) ACRI-ST , (2) FIMR, (3) ICESS UCSB
Session Observations – May 22, 2008
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Outline of this presentation
Background of Marcoast
Background of GlobColour
Validation over Baltic
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Gulf of Finland
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
MarCoast Project: Presentation SERV10, 21 May by Planetek
GMES Service Element project (ESA Funding) The main goals are:
– the surveillance and monitoring of the marine and coastal environment – to deliver services at a European scale. – integration and Sustainability
was launched in 2005 and will be completed at the end of 2008.
Background, Marcoast Project
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Background, MarCoast Project
ACRI-ST activities within Marcoast project:
-Ocean Colour Delivery Service (NRT/Archive MERIS/MODIS data) to other service providers
-Pan-European service of eutrophication statistics information
-Water quality indicator for EEA: see EuroGOOS poster P19
-Validation activities:Regional consistency assessment with in situ dataover Baltic sea in collaboration with FIMR
More on Marcoast: http://gmes-marcoast.com/
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Background, Globcolour project 2005-2008
GlobColour: ESA DUE project i.e. driven by end users: IOCCG, IOCCP,UK Met-Office,
Achievements Provision of a long time-series (1997-2007) of consistently
calibrated and merged global ocean colour productsMERIS (ESA), SeaWiFS (NASA), MODIS-AQUA (NASA)
Validation and characterisation performed with available in situ observations
Future development: Global Ocean Colour Thematic Assembly Centre of the future EU GMES Marine Core Service (MyOcean)
More on Globcolour: www.globcolour.info
( Data available on line )
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Validation with FIMR observations
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Towards the turbidity validation …. through the
In situ monitoring route: Helsinki - Travemûnde
Turbidity is routinely measured and recorded during cruises
The Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) that is used is directly comparable to the scattering of particulate matter bp
Helsinki
Travemûnde
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
2006 20076 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5
M onth
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Latit
ude
0 .2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5
M onth
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Latit
ude
Travemûnde
Helsinki
Åland
Illustration of turbidity mapping
Well identified seasonalincrease of turbidity
Spatial and temporal uniformity of turbidity
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Issues:High dissolved organic matter (CDOM) andTurbidity
High variability
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month
Ch
lro
ph
yll
a co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/m3)
Chla measured in Situ - source FIMR - 2003 Chla measured in Situ - source FIMR - 2004
Chla measured in Situ - source FIMR - 2005
Chl-a - Gulf of Finland – In situ obs. – Source : FIMR
Issues:High dissolved organic matter (CDOM) andTurbidity
High variability
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Spring bloom
2005
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Chl-a - Gulf of Finland MODIS/SeaWiFS standard algorithms – 1997-2006
Issues:High dissolved organic matter (CDOM) andTurbidity
High variability
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Spring bloomis not captured
False summer bloom of Chl
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month
Ch
lro
ph
yll
a co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/m3)
Chla measured in Situ - source FIMR - 2003
Chla - case 2 waters - observed with MERIS - 2003
Chla measured in Situ - source FIMR - 2004
Chla - case 2 waters - observed with MERIS - 2004
Chla measured in Situ - source FIMR - 2005
Chla - case 2 waters - observed with MERIS - 2005
Chl-a validation - Gulf of Finland in situ / MERIS case 2
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
The Meris-Chla algorithm for Case 2 waters gives quite good fit with in situ data for the Gulf of Finland
But …
Spatial and temporalcoverage issue
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
GlobColourData merging
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Why do ocean color data merging ?• Several simultaneous global ocean color missions• Several versions of the same product
Benefits:• Development of unified, consistent ocean color time-series from multiple sensors • Improved spatial and temporal coverage
• More diverse ocean color products with lower uncertainties
GlobColour :
• Access to products uncertainties
• Exploitation of all spectral bands from 412 nm to 670 nm.
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
GlobColourGSM algorithm
L wN() source 1 LwN() source 2 L wN() source n
LwN () uncertainties source 1 LwN () uncertainties source 2 LwN () uncertainties source n
[L wN() source 1, L wN() source 2, ..., LwN() source n]
LwN () uncertainties source 1, LwN () uncertainties source 2, ..., LwN () uncertainties source n[ ]
GSM01 MODEL INVERSION
wNL bb
bb= f(
a + )
wNL
SeaWiFSMODIS
[Chl] (443)acdm (443)bbp
DATA SOURCES
CONCATENATED ARRAYS
[Chl] confidence interval (443) confidence intervala cdm (443) confidence intervalb bp
RETRIEVALS
MERIS, MODIS, SeaWiFSLwN + Estimates of the uncertainties on input LwN (from sensors obs. characterisation)
Estimates of the model error (from NOMAD Database)
Estimates of Chla, bbp,
cdm + uncertainties on outputs (Co-variance matrix)
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Inputs: In situ observations (Nomad)Results: very close to expectancy – no significant bias
0
10
20
30
40
50
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Normalised std dev
Po
pu
lati
on
Results
Expected
Inputs: GC productsResults: very close to expectancy – a small bias is detected – the error estimates by GSM (with ad hoc inputs) is slightly underestimated.
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour GlobColour
Error estimates - Validation If the Chla error estimates is reliable
should be close to a standard normal distribution
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
GlobColourExample
GlobColour Chla-merged product – May,15 2006
GlobColour Chla-merged product relative uncertainties – May,15 2006
100
50
0
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
1009080706050403020100
%
GlobColourExample
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
bbp Error
August 7, 2007 – bbp
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
1009080706050403020100
%
GlobColourExample
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
bbp Error
March 26, 2007 – bbp
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Some empirical laws are proposed between particle backscattering coefficient (bbp) and particle scattering coefficient (bp), e.g.,
bbp≈0.015 bp (in MERIS ATBD)
In other words it is there admitted that it exists a linear relationship between the two coefficients.
The challenging objective here is therefore to make the bridge between measured bp (through NTU) and EO-derived bbp in order to bring novel insights about the linearity of the relationship and wherever possible its suitability with respect to turbidity ranges.
Turbidity in Baltic – elements of validation
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
However, it should vary with size and nature of particulate matters, and consequently could vary with time and space.
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 45 4
5 6
5 8
6 0
Travemûnde
Helsinki
Extraction of a 3x3 GC macro-pixel each 10 km for available in situ truth
Turbidity in Baltic – elements of validation EO side
In situ side
2 4 6 8 10
0
1
2
3
4
5
Filtering:Bp<1,5 + removal of « obvious » artefacts
NT
U
Month
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
2006
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
In situ & GlobColour Time Series
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Year 2006 - Observation Number
bp
In situ observation bbp (GlobColour)/0,015
Turbidity in Baltic – elements of validation
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
2006
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Turbidity in Baltic – Confrontation EO (bbp) against in situ (bp)
GSM - GlobColour (EO) bbp vs In-situ bp
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Year 2006No linear correlation
at annual scale
y = 0,0007x + 0,007
R2 = 0,002
0,000
0,005
0,010
0,015
0,020
0,025
0,030
0,035
0,040
0,045
0,050
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4
bp in situ observations
bb
p (
GS
M-
Glo
bC
olo
ur)
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Turbidity in Baltic – Confrontation EO (bbp) against in situ (bp)
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
May 2006 y = 0,0115x - 0,0005
R2 = 0,36N=3039
0,000
0,005
0,010
0,015
0,020
0,025
0,030
0,035
0,040
0,045
0,050
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4
bp in situ observations
bb
p (
GS
M-
Glo
bC
olo
ur)
July 2006 y = 0,0091x + 0,007
R2 = 0,16N=4788
0,000
0,005
0,010
0,015
0,020
0,025
0,030
0,035
0,040
0,045
0,050
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4
bp in situ observations
bb
p (
GS
M-
Glo
bC
olo
ur)
GSM - GlobColour (EO) bbp vs In-situ bp
Monthly scaleCorrelation exists …Still high (spatial) variability
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
September 2006
0,000
0,005
0,010
0,015
0,020
0,025
0,030
0,035
0,040
0,045
0,050
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4
bp in situ observations
bb
p (
GS
M-
Glo
bC
olo
ur)
Turbidity in Baltic – Confrontation EO (bbp) against in situ (bp)
….. and other sources for validation(Babin, Maritorena, personal com.)
to be compared to 0.015
GSM (in situ) vs In-situ
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
September 2006Bbp=0.0106 bp + 0.0005R2=0.39N=1012
GSM - GlobColour (EO) bbp vs In-situ bp
Turbidity in Baltic (bp<2)September 1998 - Coastlooc campaign
0,000
0,005
0,010
0,015
0,020
0,025
0,030
0,035
0,040
0,045
0,050
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4
bp (555 nm) Coastloocs
bb
p (
GS
M)
Bbp=0.0109 bp + 0.01R2=0.15
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
Turbidity in Baltic – Confrontation EO (bbp) against in situ (bp)
First conclusions:
1. A simple linear relationship between bp and bbp cannot blindly be used as is in the Baltic sea.
2. On a monthly basis, a linear relationship between bbp and bp can be used to cross-check « observed bp » against « EO-derived bbp »
3. Still some work to sort out « valid » EO-derived information (e.g. by using exclusion threshold on standard deviation) and « valid » observation (e.g. by checking spatial and temporal consistencies).
4. Work will be expanded to previous observations (2003/2004/2005)
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
FIMR feedback on the service“The Meris-Chla algorithm for Case 2 waters and by extension GSM method gives quite good fit with in situ data for the Gulf of Finland (… quite problematic due to high variation of water quality parameters).”
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
The spring bloom estimate for the Western Gulf of Finland Year 2006 - Start April 8 - Duration 35 days
GlobColour GSM : Mean 8,06 mg/m3 - Peak 21,25 mg/m3 In situ (Helcom fact sheet) : Mean 13 mg/m3 - Peak 19,4 mg/m3
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Days after start of spring bloom
Glo
bC
olo
ur
GS
M C
hla
(m
g/m
3)
Validation of turbidity productsEuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter
Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008
FIMR feedback on the service
” The service gives valuable information for the water quality evaluation of the Baltic Sea and reporting to HELCOM about the water quality status of the Baltic Sea.”
Validation of turbidity products in the Baltic derived from multi-sensors observations of ocean colour
http://www.helcom.fi/environment2/ifs/ifs2007/secchi/en_GB/secchi/http://www.helcom.fi/environment2/ifs/ifs2007/en_GB/springbloom/