Validation 100908

download Validation 100908

of 84

Transcript of Validation 100908

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    1/84

    Validation & Biomanufacturing

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    2/84

    What is Validation

    Validation An Essential Part of GMPs!

    Validation is the scientific study of a system

    To prove that the facility/system/equipment/method is consistently doing

    what it is supposed to do (i.e., that the process is under control).

    We want to make decisions based on good science and not hunches andassumptions!

    To determine the process variables and acceptable limits for these variables,

    and to set-up appropriate in-process controls.

    Is it ok if the wash from a chromatography column is pH 6.8 vs. 7.0 ?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    3/84

    FDA definition of validation

    Validation is a process ofdemonstrating, through

    documented evidence, that a process, procedure,method, piece of equipment, or facility will

    consistentlyproduce a product or result that meets

    predetermined specifications and quality

    attributes.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    4/84

    Quality Attributes Remember these?Identity

    21 CFR211.84 (d) at least one test shall be conducted to verify the identity of each component of a drug product.

    Chemical, biological, Immunological Raw materials, In-process intermediates, final products.

    Safety

    21 CFR 600.3 (p) safety as the relative freedom from harmful effect to persons affected, directly or indirectly, by aproduct when prudently administered, taking into consideration the character of the product in relationship to thecondition of the recipient at the time.

    Activity of active ingredients

    Activity of the excipients or additives

    Activity of process related impurities

    Efficacy

    Effectiveness of the product in achieving its medicinal purpose (therapeutic, prophylactic, diagnostic). Gathered atphase II and Phase III trials.

    Potency

    21 CFR 600.3 (s) specific ability or capacity of the product, as indicated by its appropriate laboratory tests or byadequately controlled clinical data obtained through the administration of the product in the manner indicated toeffect the given result.

    Purity

    21 CFR 600.3 (r) relative freedom from extraneous matters in the finished product, whether or not harmful to therecipient or deleterious to the product.

    Cleaning Procedures

    Stability

    21 CFR211.137 (a) to assure that a drug product meets applicable standards of identity, quality, and purity at thetime of use; it shall bear an expiration date determined by stability testing. Drugs may use accelerated time studies,biologics must use real time studies.

    Consistency

    The ability of the product and/or process to reliably possess specified quality attributes on an ongoing basis. 3consecutive batches of product meeting predetermined specifications is accepted as proof that a process isconsistent. However, in NDA data from up to twenty batches may be submitted.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    5/84

    Biomanufacturing

    Biomanufacturing is a complex process involving multiple unit

    operations many of which are critical to insuring patient safety and

    product efficacy

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    6/84

    InnoculumSeed

    Fermentati

    on

    ProductionFermentati

    on

    Harvest

    Ultrafiltrati

    on

    1

    Chrom. 11

    Ultrafiltrati

    on

    2

    Chrom.

    2

    Viral

    Filtration

    Chrom.

    3

    Ultrafiltrati

    on

    3

    Final

    Formulation/

    Sterile Filtration

    Sterile Fill

    UPSTREAM

    DOWN-

    STREAM

    VIRAL

    NON-VIRAL

    Block Flow Diagram of a typical Production Process

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    7/84

    Historical Basis for Validation

    Assumptions concerning virus inactivation resulted in tendeaths and 200 children becoming paralyzed, from asupposedly inactivated polio vaccine.

    Assumptions about sterilization caused severe infectionsamong burn victims given supposedly sterile solutions.

    Validation eliminates assumptions and relies on

    experimental proof!

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    8/84

    Quality by Design

    A central concept in quality is that quality can not be tested for.

    Quality must be designed and built into the production process.

    Requires careful attention to raw material specifications, in

    process material specifications, and final product specifications.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    9/84

    Validation and Quality

    Validating the performance of unit operations, analytical

    methods, and critical process points (sterilization, viral

    inactivation, cleaning procedures) is essential in insuring that

    the process generates a quality product.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    10/84

    Validation in Biomanufacturing

    Validation does not replace testing, but it does reduce thetesting burden for raw materials, in-process materials, and

    final product

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    11/84

    Validation in Biomanufacturing

    Validation itself is a process that evolves with the

    product.

    Validation requirements for production of pre-clinicalmaterial less stringent then for phase III clinical

    material.

    Critical operations must be validated: For example:

    raw materials, analytical methods, viral clearance,sterilization, cleaning.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    12/84

    Validation in Biomanufacturing

    A fully validated process is locked in

    Any change outside of the validated space invalidates process

    Change must be evaluated for effect on patient safety andproduct efficacy-Change control !

    Validated Production Process

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    13/84

    Less

    More

    Difficulty in Changing and Binding Authority

    LAWS

    Regulation

    Guidance

    Less

    More

    LAWS

    Regulation

    Guidance

    Scientific Content & Detail about Implementation

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    14/84

    Regulatory requirement for validation

    21 CFR211 Subpart H- Holding and Distribution

    211.165 Testing and release for distribution

    Requires that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, andreproducibility of test methods employed by the firmshall be established and documented. Such validationand documentation may be accomplished in accordance

    with 21 CFR 211.194 (a)(2)

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    15/84

    Regulatory requirement for validation

    Sec. 211.113 Control of microbiological contamination.

    (a) Appropriate written procedures, designed to prevent

    objectionable microorganisms in drug products not required to besterile, shall be established and followed.

    (b) Appropriate written procedures, designed to preventmicrobiological contamination of drug products purporting to besterile, shall be established and followed. Such procedures shallinclude validation of any sterilization process.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    16/84

    What does validation of any

    sterilization process mean ? What parameters are critical to sterilization?

    Temperatures, pressures, time, pore size (filtration), radiationdosage, chemical concentration.

    Must demonstrate that your autoclave reaches the temperatures,pressures, and times necessary for sterilization.

    Must demonstrate that items representing real world samples achievethose conditions ( 20 ft of1 hose; a 20 L carboy; a 500 ml bottle).

    Must challenge with worse case scenario (may take place in pilotplant if scalability demonstrated).

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    17/84

    Regulatory guidance on validation

    Guideline on General Principals of Process Validationhttp://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/pv.htm

    Guidance for Industry: For the Submission Documentation for SterilizationProcess Validation in Applications for Human and Veterinary DrugProducts. CDER CVM November1994.www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/cmc2.pdf

    Working Party on Control of Medicines and Inspections Final Version of Annex 15 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

    Title: Qualification and validation

    http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/eudralex/vol-4/pdfs-en/v4an15.pdf

    ICH Q7a Section 12 on validation

    http://www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/ICH_Q7A/index.htm

    A WHO guide to good manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements. Part 2:Validation

    Chaloner-Larsson, G., Anderson, R., and Egan, A. 1997. World HealthOrganization, Geneva.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    18/84

    Critical Operations in

    Biomanufacturing

    Some operations are more critical than others.

    Viral filtration, sterilization, cleaning, analytical methods.

    These operations will require greater validation efforts then less

    critical operations (media blending).

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    19/84

    Testing

    Usually done by the Quality Control Laboratory

    CFR requires that quality unit be under independent

    supervision and report directly to senior management

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    20/84

    Quality Assurance

    Reviews records from quality control and production departments

    Verifies that all specifications and production operations met /performed

    Investigations necessary for any deviations

    Root cause

    Affect on quality

    Corrective action (CAPA)

    Approves final release of product

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    21/84

    Designing Quality into the Product Design of production process and specifications all contribute

    to a quality product:

    Absence of contamination

    Clean rooms, closed systems, use ofBSC for criticaloperations.

    Purity

    Separation process (chromatography) designed toremove potential contaminants

    Viral purification / inactivation

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    22/84

    Validation Plan

    Organizations must define an approach towards

    validation

    What is to be validated

    How is it to be validated

    Who is to validate it

    Who is to approve the validation When it must be revalidated

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    23/84

    ValidationExamples of individual

    systems subject to validation:

    HVAC systems

    Autoclaves

    pH meters

    Depyrogenation Ovens

    Lyopholyzers

    Centrifuges

    Steam generatorsWater systems

    Compressed air systems

    Vacuum systems

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    24/84

    Validation Plan

    Regulatory agencies (FDA, EMEA, WHO, etc) identify minimumcomponents of validation.

    Industry standards (the c in cGMP) can increase validationrequirements.

    New & Novel processes / equipment require greater scrutiny thenestablished processes / equipment.

    Validation requirements increase as a product moves throughdevelopment (phase I, phase II, phase III).

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    25/84

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    26/84

    A prospective validation study

    IQ

    OQ

    Calibration

    PQ protocol

    approval

    PQ protocolexecution

    Data

    Analysis

    ValidationReport

    Approve

    Conclusions

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    27/84

    Developmental studies

    Experiments designed to explore and define the limits of the system to be

    validated

    Sterilization developmental studies may focus on

    worst case orhard to sterilize items

    Cleaning developmental studies may focus on worst case or hard to

    clean items

    Analytical methods may focus on defining the limits of the procedure

    (range, recovery, etc)

    Developmental studies then used to develop validation protocols and

    refine SOPs

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    28/84

    Validation Protocol

    Specific protocols (SOPs) that provide detailed information on what is tobe validated.

    Validation Protocols consist of: A description of the process, equipment, or method to be validated.

    A description of the validation method.

    A description of the sampling procedure including the kind andnumber of samples.

    Acceptance criteria for test results. Schedule or criteria for revalidation.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    29/84

    Example of a protocol for the

    IQ component of validating a

    pH meter

    As with all other SOPs this

    document will contain an

    Objective, scope, and responsibility

    Section.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    30/84

    Validation Protocol

    Validation Protocols may consist of multiple SOPs each

    describing specific steps in the validation process

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    31/84

    Critical Systems

    How critical is the system being validated to final product quality?

    Media blending systems for cell growth vs. final fill & finishoperations

    Demonstrating that the device which fills, labels, and caps thefinal product will require more extensive validation then the

    blenders used to prepare media for bioreactors.

    Validation of complex devices may take years!

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    32/84

    Validation

    Proceeds in stages with new facilities / equipment.

    Planning for validation should start with the design

    process.

    Leaving validation to the last minute is asking for

    trouble.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    33/84

    Stages of Validation

    Starts with Design & Receipt:

    Does the equipment meet the needs (is the autoclave bigenough?)

    Do you have the manuals, spare parts, can you plug it in?

    Is it installed properly (drain lines, vents, etc) Does it work?

    Does the autoclave reach the necessary temp. and pressure?

    Can the autoclave sterilize your equipment (worse casesituation)?

    How does it work in the manufacturing process? Can it handle production quantities?

    Will failure compromise product quality?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    34/84

    IQ, OQ, PQ ?

    Installation Qualification (IQ)

    A process used to document that the piece of equipment was supplied andinstalled properly and that appropriate utilities, i.e., electrical, steam, gas,etc. are available to operate the equipment according to the manufacturersspecifications.

    Operational Qualification (OQ)

    A process designed to supply the documented evidence that a piece ofequipment operates as it is intended through all anticipated operationalranges.

    Performance (Process) Qualification (PQ)Verifies that a process / piece of equipment performs as it is intended to inthe manufacturing process and produces product (in process or final)meeting predetermined specifications.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    35/84

    Typical information in an IQ protocol

    Name and description of equipment, including model numbers

    Identification, including model and serial numbers

    Location of the equipment Any utility requirements, i.e. electrical voltage, steam or water

    pressure, etc.

    Any safety features of the equipment, including alarms, interlocks,or relief valves.

    That all documentation, including manufacturers contact

    information, spare parts inventory, operational manual, andinstallation drawings are available on site.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    36/84

    Typical OQ Protocol Components

    Objective

    Responsibility Equipment required (Calibration verification & Traceability)

    SOP(s) used

    Equipment Identification

    Parameters measured (Specifications)

    Documentation

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    37/84

    Validation

    Ideally validation takes place prior to actual production runs,however in some cases validation may take place as productis produced, or past production runs may be used to providevalidation data.

    ProspectiveValidation

    ConcurrentValidation

    Retrospective Validation

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    38/84

    Revalidation

    Is the initial validation of a piece of equipment the end?

    No!

    Periodic revalidation may be necessary depending on the criticalityof the equipment

    Changes need to be evaluated for their impact on validation

    Deviations from specifications may require revalidation

    Revalidation spelled out in MasterValidation Plan

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    39/84

    Change Control

    Must assess impact of changes on FDA compliance and validation

    state.

    Change control is a formal process defined in company SOP on howprocess/equipment changes are evaluated.

    Any change that takes place outside the change control process canjeopardize product quality (patient safety).

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    40/84

    References Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America) Validation

    Advisory Committee ProcessValidation Concepts for Drug Products Pharmaceutical Technology, September1985 p 82.

    Bismuth, G. CleaningValidation: A Practical Approach. CRC Press, 2000. ISBN 1574911082. Pharmaceutical ProcessValidation, 3rd Ed. Edited by Robert Nash and Alfred Wachter, Marcel Decker, 2003. ISBN

    082470838-5

    Validation of Pharmaceutical Processes:Sterile Products. 1998. 2nd Edition.Edited by Frederick J. Carlton and JamesAgalloco. Marcel Decker, 1998. ISBN 0824793846.

    Validation Standard Operating Procedures:A step by Step Guide for Achieving Compliance in the Pharmaceutical, MedicalDevice, and Biotech Industries, Syed Imtiaz Haider, St. Lucie Press, 2002. ISBN 1574443313.

    Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceuticals:A Plan for Total Quality Control From Manufacturer to Consumer,Sidney J. Willig. Marcel Decker, 2000. ISBN 0824704258.

    Voss, J. Cleaning and Cleaning Validation: A Biotechnology Perspective. CRC Press, 1995. ISBN 0939459507.

    LeBlanc, D.A. 2000.Validated Cleaning Technologies for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing. CRC Press. ISBN 1574911163. Cloud, P. 1998. PharmaceuticalEquipmentValidation: The Ultimate Qualification Guidebook. CRC Press. ISBN

    1574910795.

    Juran, Quality Control Handbook, 4th Edition., McGraw-Hill, 1988.

    DeSain C, Sutton C. (1995). Process development that supports process validation. Pharmaceutical Technology19 (Oct.):130-136, 1995.

    Garcia T, Wilkinson S, Scott J. The development of a blend-sampling technique to assess the uniformity of a powdermixture. DrugDevelopment and Industrial Pharmacy27(4):297-307,2001.

    Chaloner-Larsson, G., Anderson, R.,Egan, A. 1997. A WHO guide to good manufacturing practice (GMP) requirementsPart 2:Validation . World Health Organization, Geneva. www.who.int/vaccines-documents/DocsPDF/www9666.pdf

    Accessed on October2nd, 2006. Brown, F. 1993. Review of accidents caused by incomplete inactivation of viruses. Dev. Biol. Stand. 81: 103-7

    Nathanson, N. and Langmuir, A.D. 1995. The Cutter incident. Poliomyelitis following formaldehyde-inactivated poliovirusvaccination in the United States during the Spring of1955. II. Relationship of poliomyelitis to Cutter vaccine. 1963.Am. J.Epidemiol.142:109-40.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    41/84

    Autoclave Validation

    IQ-

    Design specifications meet users needs

    Proper installation, utilities, manuals, spare parts

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    42/84

    The DQ, IQ, OQ process

    insures that this autoclave

    will meet the needs of the

    manufacturing group.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    43/84

    Sample Format forInstallationQualification of an autoclave.

    Courtesy of WHO. Chaloner-Larsson, G.,Anderson, R.,Egan, A. 1997. A WHO guide to good

    manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements Part 2:Validation .

    World Health Organization, Geneva. www.who.int/vaccines-documents/DocsPDF/www9666.pdf

    Accessed on October 2nd, 2006.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    44/84

    Autoclave Validation

    OQ

    Does it operate properly Does it reach the specified temperature and

    pressure

    Do timers work

    Does the operator interface panel work

    Are safety interlocks functional

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    45/84

    Sample Format forOperational

    Qualification of an autoclave.

    Courtesy of WHO. Chaloner-Larsson, G.,Anderson, R.,Egan, A. 1997. A WHO guide to good

    manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements Part 2: Validation .World Health Organization, Geneva

    . www.who.int/vaccines-documents/DocsPDF/www9666.pdfAccessed on October 2nd, 2006.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    46/84

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    47/84

    Monitoring Temperature

    Figure 2: A validator, used in the

    operational qualification of an

    autoclave. The validator is

    attached to individual

    thermocouples by wires comingfrom the rear of the instrument

    (arrow). Tha validator has been

    previously calibrated and the data

    gathered from the thermocouples

    will be logged on the laptop

    computer. The software on thecomputer is also subject to

    validation requirements.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    48/84

    Figure 4. The validator is

    attached to individual

    thermocouples (TC) by thin

    wires that pass through the

    wall of the autoclavethrough a specially

    designed port (arrow). This

    picture shows the back side

    of the autoclave. The

    validator is out of view at

    the lower left.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    49/84

    Figure 5. The inside of the

    autoclave showing the maze

    of wiring connecting the

    individual TCs to the

    validator. The port through

    which the wires pass is

    visible in the middle left of

    the picture. The individual

    TCs will be placed in various

    areas of the autoclave or

    equipment being autoclavedto generate a thermal map of

    the interior of the autoclave.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    50/84

    Figure 3. Output from the

    validator. The temperature at

    each connected thermocouple is

    displayed. Accumulated lethality

    (F0) may also be displayed.Notice how some TChave failed

    and will not record a

    temperature. Accounting for TC

    failure is necessary to keep from

    having to repeat a study.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    51/84

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    52/84

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    53/84

    Developmental Studies

    Developmental studies are

    used to identify hard to

    autoclave items and totest if item preparation has

    an effect on ability to be

    sterilized

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    54/84

    Developmental Studies

    Every little nook and cranny

    Needs to be assessed ! We

    have to prove that the inside

    of the pipe reaches sufficient

    temperature, for a long

    enough time to insure sterility!

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    55/84

    Developmental Studies

    Does bagging make a difference?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    56/84

    Cleaning Validation

    Validating the cleaning cycle

    on a loaded dishwasher.

    Notice the various pipes andparts with narrow openings.

    Identification of hard to clean

    and easy to clean areas starts

    with developmental studies

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    57/84

    How do we validate a dishwasher ?

    How do we identify hard to clean & easy to clean items?

    How do we test to see if they are cleaned?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    58/84

    Going over the documentation

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    59/84

    Cleaning Validation

    Sampling, documenting, and

    verifying is a labor intensive

    process

    Why is cleaning considered a

    critical process?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    60/84

    Sampling

    Figure 8. Swabbing is

    commonly used to sample the

    surface of cleaned materials.

    The swab is then placed in a

    sample vial and sent to theQuality Control lab for

    analysis. Proper technique is

    essential in order to evaluate

    the effectiveness of cleaning

    techniques. Even so,

    swabbing results are typically

    corrected for knowndeficiencies in recovery.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    61/84

    Cleaning Validation

    Figure 9. Analysis of rinse water

    for residual cleaning agents orprocess materials is an essential

    component of cleaning validation.

    Insuring that the sample is not

    contaminated requires vigilance

    and properly following the

    relevantSOPs.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    62/84

    Analytical methods validation

    Considered a critical step in the manufacturing process

    Requirements for validated analytical methods explicitly written intothe CFRs

    211.165 Testing and release for distribution

    Requires that the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility oftest methods employed by the firm shall be established and documented.Such validation and documentation may be accomplished in accordancewith 21 CFR211.194 (a)(2)

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    63/84

    Testing For Identity

    Requires the development of validated analytical methods that can

    determine identity. Chemical Tests:

    Is the molecule chemically what it is supposed to be?

    Biological Activity Tests:

    Does the molecules have the biologic activity that it is supposed tohave?

    Immunogenic Tests:

    Is the molecule immunogenic (allergic)?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    64/84

    Identity

    21 CFR requires testing of raw materials:

    Raw materials quarantined until identity verified

    Raw materials must meet predetermined specifications

    Vendors (and alternates) specified in BLA (NDA)

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    65/84

    Identity

    21 CFR requires testing of in-process materials:

    Product from bioreactor / fermentor Product from purification steps

    Waste products from above

    Must meet specifications, if not - stop the

    process to investigate take corrective action

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    66/84

    Regulatory guidance on validation

    Guideline on General Principals of Process Validationhttp://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/pv.htm

    Guidance for Industry: For the Submission Documentation for SterilizationProcess Validation in Applications for Human and Veterinary DrugProducts. CDER CVM November1994.www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/cmc2.pdf

    Working Party on Control of Medicines and Inspections

    Final Version of Annex 15 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

    Title: Qualification and validation

    http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/eudralex/vol-4/pdfs-en/v4an15.pdf

    ICH Q7a Section 12 on validation

    http://www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/ICH_Q7A/index.htm

    A WHO guide to good manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements. Part 2:Validation

    Chaloner-Larsson, G., Anderson, R., and Egan, A. 1997. World HealthOrganization, Geneva.

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    67/84

    Validation Protocol

    Specific protocol based on developmental studies

    Protocol is written, reviewed and approved Protocol is executed

    Report written and approved

    System is validated

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    68/84

    Analytical Methods Validation

    B

    eing a critical component of productionprocess analytical methods must be validated

    Raw material testing

    In process materials

    Final product specifications

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    69/84

    What must be demonstrated

    Selectivity (specificity)

    Accuracy

    Precision Linear Range

    Limit of detection (LOD)

    Limit of quantification (LOQ or LLOQ)

    Robustness

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    70/84

    Validated methods

    USP NF (United States Pharmacopeia National Formulary) contains

    validated analytical methods

    Use of a USP method does not eliminate the organizations

    obligation to demonstrate that the method performs adequetly

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    71/84

    Selectivity (specificity)

    Does the analytical method detect the component it is supposed

    to detect? Cross reactivity in antibody based methods

    Demonstrate specificity by conducting analytical method on

    materials that may mimic analyte of interest

    Looking forfalse positives

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    72/84

    Accuracy

    Ability of analytical method to accurately determine the

    presence and amount of the analyte of interest Typically done by analyzing a traceable standard

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    73/84

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    74/84

    Linear Range

    Must define the linear range of a method

    Assay may have multiple linear ranges

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    75/84

    Precision

    How much variability does the assay exhibit when analyzingthe same sample

    Typically demonstrated by analyzing multiple aliquots of a

    homogenous sample

    Acceptance criteria will depend on the assay and the

    material being assayed (2-20% RSD)

    Typically expressed as % RSD (relative standard deviation)

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    76/84

    Limit ofDetection (LOD)

    Lowest level at which method can detect analyte

    Results reported as less than LOD

    Based on signal to noise specification (10:1, 20:1)

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    77/84

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    78/84

    Limit ofQuantification (LOQ)

    Lowest level at which method can accurately quantify analyte

    Based on signal-to-noise ratio specification (10:1, 20:1)

    and precision specification

    Precision and LOQ related

    Lower LOQ will typically result in lower precision

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    79/84

    Bradford Assayfor total protein

    Well known colorimetric assay that relies on the binding of

    Commassie G-250 dye to the proteins in an acidic solution

    Dye binding proportional to number of positive charges in

    protein

    Proteins >3000 dal not detected

    Simple, quick, wide range, few interfering agents

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    80/84

    BradfordA

    ssay

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    81/84

    Disadvantages

    Incompatability with surfactants Staining of glass and quartz cuvettes

    Use disposable polystyrene cuvettes

    Or wash with strong detergents and methanol

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    82/84

    Validating the Bradford

    Selectivity (specificity)

    Accuracy

    Recovery

    Precision

    Linear Range

    Limit of detection (LOD)

    Limit of quantification (LOQ or LLOQ) Robustness

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    83/84

    Some Questions

    A valve used to transfer material from a holding tank to the purification suitejams closed. You have a spare valve that is an identical model. Can you changethis valve with the spare and continue operations? What if the valve is from adifferent manufacturer?

    You notice that your autoclave loading plan leaves room for additional material.

    Realizing that increasing that amount of material in the autoclave will shortenthe turn around time for the production line you contemplate increasing theamount of material loaded into the autoclave then specified by the loading plan.What should you do? What will be required to implement this change?

    An SOP for calibration of a pH meter calls for a two point calibration at pH 4and pH 7. You notice that a single point calibration at pH 7 produces the same

    result from pH measurements of your buffer solutions and allows you to take alonger break. Is it Ok to do the one point calibration when the SOP calls for atwo point calibration? How would you go about changing the SOP to allow for aone point calibration?

  • 8/6/2019 Validation 100908

    84/84

    What documents would provide information concerning the make and

    model of a particular valve used to regulate the transfer of material from a

    holding tank to the purification suite?

    Your supervisor is concerned that the fermentation vessel is not providing

    sufficient aeration of the culture to get optimal growth and suggests

    installing a different kind of baffle in the vessel. How would you

    demonstrate that this change has no effect on product quality?