Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

download Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

of 11

Transcript of Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    1/11

    ELPIDIO S. UY, G.R. No. 167245

    Petitioner,

    Present:

    Panganiban, C.J. (Chairperson),

    - verss - !nares-"antiago,

    #stria-$artine%,

    Ca&&e'o, "r., an

    Chio-Na%ario,JJ.

    FIRST METRO INTEGRATED

    STEEL CORP. and HON. ANTONIO

    I. DE CASTRO, in his capacity as

    P!sidin" #$d"!, R!"i%na& Tia& C%$t,

    Nati%na& Capita& #$dicia& R!"i%n, Pro*&gate:

    'anch (, Mani&a, Responents. "epte*ber 27, 2++6

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DECISION

    YNARES)SANTIAGO,J.:

    his petition or revie/ ner R&e 45 o the R&es o Cort assai&s the

    0eision1o the Cort o #ppea&s in C#-G.R. "P No. 31+46 ate #gst 27,

    2++4 is*issing petitioner &piio ". s petition or ertiorari an its

    Reso&tion2ate 8ebrar 22, 2++5 ening the *otion or reonsieration.

    he ats sho/ that on 9& 5, 1, private responent 8irst $etro

    ;ntegrate "tee& Corporation (8$;"C) i&e a o*p&aint or s* o *one /ith

    praer or /rit o pre&i*inar attah*ent against Robert 9an (Robert),

    $i&an ;ntegrate Constrtion Co*pan ($;CC) an herein petitioner &piio

    , /ith the Regiona& ria& Cort o $ani&a, /hih /as o.>

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn1http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn2http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn3http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn2http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn3http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn1
  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    2/11

    ;t is a&&ege that on 9ne >, 5 an 6, 13, 8$;"C e&ivere to $;CC,

    Robert an petitioner eor*e stee& bars va&e at P65,311.++. ?n 9ne , 13,

    Robert a&&ege& e&ivere to 8$;"C $etroban< Che< No. +4232 in the a*ont

    o P65,311.++ isse b petitioner as pa*ent. @o/ever, the he< /as

    ishonore pon present*ent an espite e*ans, $;CC, Robert an petitioner

    rese to pa, hene the o*p&aint.

    ;n their #ns/er /ith Conter&ai* an Cross&ai*, Robert an $;CC

    a&&ege that the are strangers to the ontrat bet/een 8$;"C an petitionerA that

    Robert *ere& reerre petitioner to 8$;"CA that petitioner &et his he< in

    Roberts oie /hih /as pi

  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    3/11

    hearing /as ane&&e an reshe&e to 0ee*ber 1>, 2++1. @o/ever,

    on 0ee*ber 1+, 2++1, #tt. $o&ina /ithre/ his appearane as petitioners

    onse& /ith the &atters onsent. ?n0ee*ber 1>, 2++1, #tt. 0ani&o =aDares

    entere his appearane an reEeste or a resetting on 8ebrar 14 an 23,

    2++21+/hih /as grante b the tria& ort. ?n 8ebrar 14, 2++2, #tt. =aDares

    appeare bt instea o presenting eviene or the petitioner, he reEeste or a

    postpone*ent an resetting o the hearing.11

    0ring the she&e hearing on 8ebrar 23, 2++2, #tt. =aDares arrive

    &ate. pon *otion o 8$;"C, the tria& ort orere that petitioners right to

    present eviene is ee*e /aive an the parties /ere irete to i&e their

    respetive *e*oran*.12 he ase /as ee*e sb*itte or eision

    on Nove*ber 13, 2++2.1>

    #tt. =aDares /ithre/ his appearane on 9anar 3, 2++> /ith petitioners

    onor*it.14

    ?n $arh 7, 2++>, the tria& ort renere 'g*ent,15the ispositive

    portion o /hih reas as o&&o/s:

    F@R8?R, 'g*ent is hereb renere in avor o p&ainti

    orering eenant &piio to pa the or*er:

    a) the s* o P6+,+++ /ith interest thereon at 12

    per ann* ro* 9& 13 nti& && paiA

    b) the s* o P11+,+++.++ as attornes ees /hih is

    16 o the prinipa& a*ontA an

    ) the osts o sit.

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn9http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn11http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn14http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn15http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn9http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn10http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn11http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn12http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn13http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn14http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn15
  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    4/11

    0eenant Robert s ross-&ai* is enie as it is no/

    aae*i. he onter&ai*s o both eenants herein against p&ainti

    an against eah other are enie or &a< o *erit.

    "? ?R0R0.16

    ?n #pri& 4, 2++>, petitioner reeive a op o the 0eision.

    ?n #pri& 21, 2++>, petitioner throgh #tt. as C. Carpio, 9r. i&e a

    $otion or Ne/ ria&17on the gron o gross neg&igene o petitioners onse&

    in ai&ing to atten the hearing or the reeption o eviene, ths i*pairing his

    rights to e proess.

    he tria& ort enie the *otion or ne/ tria& in an ?rer13ate ?tober

    1, 2++>.

    0issatisie, petitioner i&e /ith the Cort o #ppea&s a petition or

    ertiorari /hih is*isse the petition in its assai&e 0eision ate #gst 27,

    2++4. ;t he& that the tria& ort orret& enie the *otion or ne/ tria& bease it/as i&e ot o ti*e an that a petition or ertiorari is not the proper re*e or

    the enia& o a *otion or ne/ tria&.

    Petitioners *otion or reonsieration /as enie, hene, this reorse on

    the grons that H

    1. he "eventeenth (17th

    ) 0ivision o the Cort o #ppea&s grave&erre in ening e orse to the Petition or Certiorari on

    tehnia& grons, that is, or the prporte ai&re o the

    Petitioner to i&e /ith the Cort a Quo his $otion or Ne/ ria&

    /ithin the reg&e*entar perio to appea& an that the on& re*e

    or the enia& o the &atter *otion is b appea&ing ro* the

    9g*ent or 8ina& orer an not throgh a "peia& Civi& #tion

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn16http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn18http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn16http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn17http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn18
  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    5/11

  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    6/11

    In all t!e abo"e instances w!ere t!e #$dgment or final order is

    not appeasable% t!e aggrie"ed party may file an appropriate special

    ci"il action $nder &$le ' (*phasis spp&ie)

    hs, the i&ing b the petitioner o a petition or ertiorari /ith the Cort o

    #ppea&s ro* the enia& o the *otion or ne/ tria& b the tria& ort is proper.

    Not/thstaning the oregoing, /e in that the tria& ort orret& enie

    petitioners *otion or ne/ tria&.

    "etion 1, R&e >7 provies that a *otion or ne/ tria& *a be i&e /ithin

    the perio or ta, 2++1. Petitioner /as

    represente b #tt. Carpio, 9r. as o&&aborating onse& ring the hearing

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn23http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn23
  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    7/11

    on ?tober 25, 2++1 bt no eviene /as presente. ;nstea, the hearing /as

    ane&&e. ?n 0ee*ber 1>, 2++1, #tt. =aDares, petitioners ne/ onse&,

    appeare bt he reEeste or a resetting. ?n 8ebrar 14, 2++2, #tt. =aDares

    *ove to postpone the hearing to 8ebrar 23, 2++2 as previos&

    she&e. ?n 8ebrar 23, 2++2, #tt. =aDares arrive &ate.

    "rtin o the reors is&ose that the hearings /ere postpone or

    ane&&e /ithot an 'stiiation. @o/ever, the tria& ort ao**oate the

    reEests or postpone*ent or resetting in orer to aor petitioner e

    proess. ner the ir*stanes, /e in petitioners onse&s ai&re to atten

    the seven she&e hearings /ithot 'stiiab&e reason tanta*ont

    to in!*c$sa+&!neg&et. #s sh, it annot be a gron or ne/ tria&.

    ;n aition, the R&e reEires that *otions or ne/ tria& one on ra,

    aient, *ista

  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    8/11

    Igoo aseJ27are *ere on&sions /hih i not provie the ort /ith an

    basis or eter*ining the natre an *erit o the ase. #n aiavit o *erit sho&

    state ats, an not *ere opinion or on&sions o &a/. 23 Petitioners *otion or

    ne/ tria& an aiavit o *erit i not *ention the eviene /hih he /as

    prevente ro* introing, nor i it a&&ege that sh eviene /o& hange the

    oto*e o the ase.

    Petitioners arg*ent that his onse&s neg&igene /as so gross that he /as

    eprive o e proess ai&s to i*press. Gross neg&igene is not one o the

    grons or a *otion or a ne/ tria&. Fe annot e&are his onse&s neg&igene

    as gross as to &iberate hi* ro* the eets o his ai&re to present ontervai&ing

    eviene.2 ;n!ir "hilippines Corporation #. $nternational %usiness !#iation

    Ser#ices, "hils., $nc.,>+/e i not onsier as gross neg&igene the onse&s

    resort to i&ator she*es, sh as (1) the i&ing o at &east three *otions to eten

    the i&ing o petitioners #ns/erA (2) his nonappearane ring the she&e

    pretria&sA an (>) the ai&re to i&e petitioners pretria& =rie, even ater the i&ing o

    severa& $otions to eten the ate or i&ing.

    =esies, /e in that petitioners an his onse&s neg&igene are

    onrrent. 0ring the initia& hearing or the reeption o his eviene, petitioner

    /as absent a&&ege& e to in&en%a. 0ring the seeing she&e hearings,

    petitioner /as absent bt his &a/er, #tt. $o&ina, /as present bt i not present

    an eviene. ;nstea, *otions or postpone*ent or resetting /ere *ae. ;n one

    oasion, #tt. $o&ina /as absent bt #tt. Carpio, 9r. appeare as o&&aborating

    onse&. "ti&&, no eviene /as presente bt a resetting /as again reEeste.

    ?n 0ee*ber 1>, 2++1, petitioner hire #tt. =aDares as his ne/ onse&,

    an the hearings /ere set on 8ebrar 14 an 23, 2++2. 8or petitioner, ths, to

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn27http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn28http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn29http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn30http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn27http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn28http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn29http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn30
  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    9/11

    eign an insist pon a &a< o a/areness o the progress o the ase is to n*as< a

    penhant or the &iros.>1 Fhen he hire the servies o #tt. =aDares, it is

    high& i*probab&e that he /as na/are o the stage o the proeeings. ;n or an averse eision, as in the instant

    ase.

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn31http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn32http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn33http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn31http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn32http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2006/september2006/G.R.%20No.%20167245.htm#_ftn33
  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    10/11

    HEREFORE, the instant petition is DENIEDor &a< o *erit.

  • 8/12/2019 Uy vs First Metro Integrated Steel

    11/11

    SO ORDERED.