Presentation Author, 2006

UW-Milwaukee Report on Four Differential Tuition Programs

Rita ChengProvost and Vice Chancellor for Academic

Affairs

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 2

Differential Tuition Revenue3-year totals

– $1.6 M in the Peck School of the Arts

– $650,000 in the College of Engineering and Applied Science

– $2.6 M in the Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business

– $800,000 in the College of Nursing

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 3

Black & Gold Committees

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 4

Student Support• Differential tuition approved to continue

by students affected– College of Nursing Black & Gold

Committee– Peck School of the Arts Black & Gold

Committee– Sheldon S. Lubar School of Business

Black & Gold Committee

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 5

Student Support• Differential tuition approved to continue

by students affected– College of Engineering and Applied

Science Advisory Committee on Differential Tuition

• Also endorsed by UWM Student Association and Senate

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 6

Funding addresses needs in1. Technologies important for the

discipline2. Instructional quality 3. Student services

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 7

Technology and Equipment

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 8

Nursing:Patient Simulator

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 9

Sheldon S. Lubar School of Business

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 10

Peck School of the Arts

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 11

Engineering: Laboratory Equipment

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 12

College of Nursing Graduating Seniors Rating Preparation for Future Career as Excellent or Good

71.8%

89.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 13

College of Engineering and Applied Sciences Graduating Seniors Rating Classrooms and Facilities as Excellent or Good

55.8%

70.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 14

College of Engineering and Applied Sciences Graduating Seniors Rating Computer Labs and Services as Excellent or Good

77.1%

90.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 15

Quality of Instruction

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 16

Peck School of the Arts: Visiting Artist

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 17

Sheldon S. Lubar School of Business

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 18

School of the Arts Graduating Seniors Rating Access to Faculty/Staff as Excellent or Good

91.1%

83.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 19

College of Nursing Graduating Seniors Rating Instructional Quality as Excellent or Good

78.2%

92.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 20

Academic & Student Services

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 21

Advising

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 22

Career Fair

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 23

School of Business Graduating Seniors Rating Career Advising and Job Placement Services as Excellent or Good

60.8%

49.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 24

School of Business Graduating Seniors Rating Academic Advising as Excellent or Good

79.1%

61.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2007

2004

Presentation to the Board of Regents Business & Finance Committee, 2008 25

Differential Tuition Impact