Utilisation of Gd II Fuel Assemblies at Bohunice NPP Unit … · Utilisation of Gd II Fuel...
Transcript of Utilisation of Gd II Fuel Assemblies at Bohunice NPP Unit … · Utilisation of Gd II Fuel...
Utilisation of Gd II Fuel Assemblies at Bohunice
NPP Unit 3, 4
O. Grežďo, M. Kačmar 9/2006
16th AER Symposium of AER on WWER Reactor Physic and Reactor safetySeptember 25-29,2006,Bratislava,Slovakia
1
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Contents
1. Brief summary of Bohunice V-2 (3. and 4. unit) NPP fuel cycle
2. Gd II fuel licensing
3. Consequences of Gd II fuel utilization
4. First experience with new fuel with burnable absorber and upgraded
core monitoring system
5. Conclusion
2
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
1. Brief summary of Bohunice V-2 (3. and 4. unit) NPP fuel cycle
In the fig. 1. you can see evolution of nuclear fuel cycle in Bohunice V-2 up to the moment. This changes results in better nuclear fuel cycle economy and reduction of neutron flux on reactor vessel.
The close changes of fuel cycle is expected in connection with increase of the reactor power:-104% (2008 3.unit)-105%(2009 4.unit) -107%(2010 3 and 4. unit).
Number of leakage assemblies is in the fig.2
2.Gd II fuel licensing for 3. and 4. unit Bohunice NPP
Choice of supplier and fuel licensing took aproximately four years. Regulatory authority accept new fuel 26 months after contract was signed. If we want prepare new contract in 2011 year(current contract is valid to 2010), we dont have a lot of time.
3
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
3. Consequences of Gd II fuel utilization
3.1Change of operational limits and conditions
Power distribution
both and kq ≤ 1,8 - for 1.generation fuel
both and kr ≤ 2,2 - for 1.generation fuel
both and kr ≤ 2,2 - for 2.generation fuel
NNk dovq 40,1≤
NN
60,1k dovr ≤
NN
66,1k dovr ≤
4
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
M a x i m á l n y d o v o l e n ý l i n e á r n y v ý k o n p a l i v o v é h o p r ú t i k a v z á v i s l o s t i n a v y h o r e n í p a l i v o v é h o p r ú t i k a
1 7 0
1 8 0
1 9 0
2 0 0
2 1 0
2 2 0
2 3 0
2 4 0
2 5 0
2 6 0
2 7 0
2 8 0
2 9 0
3 0 0
3 1 0
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0V y h o r e n ie p a l iv o v é h o p r ú t ik a [ M W d /k g U ]
ql m
ax [W
/cm
]
2 9 1
2 5 5
1 9 2
1 7 9
Maximal linear power of fuel element
Maximal linear power of fuel element in dependance on fuel element burn up
Fuel element burn up [MWd/kg]
5
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Working CA group position
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Power [%Nnom]
Wor
king
gro
up C
A p
ositi
on [c
m]
Minimálna dovolená poloha 6.skupiny HRK v ustálenom stave
Minimálna dovolená poloha 6.skupiny HRK v prechodovom stave
Maximálna dovolená poloha 6.skupiny HRK v ustálenom aj prechodovom stave
100, 215
100, 250
80, 125
50, 215
100, 195
2, 50
minimal position sixth group of CA (stable state)
minimal position sixth group of CA (unstable state)
minimal position sixth group of CA (stable and unstable state)
6
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
System SCORPIO evaluates signals from temperature and neutron detectors placed in the reactor and gives information about the core power distribution to the reactor operator and physicists.
Main functions of CMS SCORPIO:
- Processing of mesurement data - Temperature sensor calibration- 3-D power distribution reconstruction- Limit checking and termal margin calculation- Calculation of margin to PCI- Primary circuit coolant activity monitoring- Reactivity measurement during start-up- Predictive mode and strategic planning- Automated set up for new cycle- Data archiving
3.2 Core monitoring system(CMS) SCORPIO upgrade
7
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Core follow mode provides:
- Monitoring of measured and calculating parameters of reactor, fuel assemblies and fuel pins- Checking the status of the in-core detectors- Evaluation of margins to operational and safety limits and alarm indication- Displaing of the trend curves of selected parameters, display of detailed core map - Displaing the status of each modules- Archiving of selected parameters in the user forms
Core predictive mode (strategy generator)
Core predictive mode provides information for optimization of expected power changes for the 168 hours aheadSystem calculates:
- minimal changes of boron acid concentration during power transients
- power distribution during expected power changes- critical boron concentration- control fuel assembly critical position- shutdown boron concentration
8
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Main monitoring (limits) parameters of core:
- Outlet temperature of fuel assemblies- Coolant temperature rises in the fuel assemblies- Radial assembly-wise power peaking factors kq- Pin-wise power peaking factors kr- linear power qlin
Other monitoring parameters of core:- Nodal power peaking factors kv- Nuclear heat flux hot channel factors Fq- Departure from nucleate boiling ratio DNBR-Margin of subchannel output coolant temperature to the saturation temperature tSAT
9
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
CMS Scorpio software upgrade
- Change from 20/40 calculation point along the height of core to 42 calculation point.- Changes of neutron- physical model as a result of geometric and material changes. - Implementation of diffusion libraries for new fuel type.- KRITEX(Reactivity measurement during start-up) module changes.- STRATEGIC GENERATOR(Predictive mode) module changes- Add an option to do correction of assemblies outlet temperature in dependence on
power distribution profile in Gd II assembly(This option don´t use up to the moment).- Possibility of manual set CA position.
10
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
4. First experience with new fuel with burnable absorber and upgraded coremonitoring system
Following figures and tables summarize first comparsion between theoretical and „experimental „values.
„experimental“ values – experimental values measured during physical start-up (nonstandardmeasure system)
– values calculated with CMS SCORPIO (MOBYDICK)
theoretical values - values calculated with BIPR-7
11
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
4.1 Operation with Gd II fuel 22.cycle 4.unit Bohunice NPP
Core loading pattern
2
20
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
191817161514131211
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
34333231302928
36 37 38 39 40 41
4746
5251504948
45444342
53 54 55 56
57 58
59
35
ENRICHMENT
ENRICHMENT
ENRICHMENT
12
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Physical start-up results
Duration: from 13.7.2006 9.24 to 16.7.2006 3.00
Theoretical Experimental Deviation CriteriaCritical concentration H3BO3 in PC [g/kg] 7.78 7.55 -0.22 ±0.4 g/kgAsymetry coeficients min 1 0.964 -0.036 -7%rel
max 1 1.064 0.064 7%relAsyptotic period min - - -13.40% -30%rel
max - - 6.40% 30%rel200 [OC] -0.61 -0.74 0.13 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC210 -0.74 -0.85 0.11 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC220 -0.87 -0.97 0.10 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC
Temperature reactivity coefficient [10-2%/oC] 230 -0.99 -1.11 0.12 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC240 -1.12 -1.26 0.14 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC250 -1.25 -1.44 0.19 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC260 -1.38 -1.65 0.27 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC
CA system total worth [%] 12.5 12.34 1.40% ±21%relCA system total worth with CA 03-46 stuck[%] 8.26 7.68 7.00% ±20%relWorth of "ejected" CA 06-49 [%] 0.52 0.59 -11.90% ±20%relCA drop time [s] 8 to 13 10.2 to 11.6 - from 8 to 13 sBoron acid worth [%kg/g] -1.48 -1.44 2.80% ±17%relWorth of working CA [%] 0.81 0.87 -6.90% ±17%relIsothermal state TČ - < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
OT - < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
13
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Graph of boron acid concentration
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280
Eff.days
c B [g
/kg]
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
Pow
er[M
W],C
A6[
mm
]
BIPR
EXP
EXP norm.
Power
CA6
14
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Maximal radial assembly-wise power peaking factors kqComparsion BIPR-SCORPIO
11/6
11/6
11/611/6
11/6 21/2
21/6
21/2
21/6
1717
1717171717
17
16
16
1616
16
1616
14
141414
1414
141414
14
14
14
14
21
212121
1.25
1.27
1.29
1.31
1.33
1.35
1.37
1.39
1.41
1.43
1.45
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Eff.days
kq
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
kq max I.generation
kq max II.generation
kq max.I.generation BIPR
kq max.I.generation BIPR
power
15
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Pin-wise power peaking factors krComparsion BIPR-SCORPIO
1616
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
1616
161717
17/3
17/317/317/317/3
17/3
9/59/59/49/5
9/5
39
3939
3939
39
39
39
39
3939
399
99
9
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
1.6
0 50 100 150 200 250
Eff.days
kr
kr max. I.generation BIPR
kr max. I.generation
kr max. II.generation
kr max. II.generation BIPR
16
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Maximal linear power qlin
17/3
17/317/317/3
9/59/59/49/4
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
0 20 40 60 80 100
Eff.days
qlin
[W/c
m]
I.generation
II.generation
Limit for I.generation
Limit for II.generation
17
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Comparsion between experimental(SCORPIO) and teoretical(BIPR) group kq and relative deviation2.eff.days
20.7.2006 Tef = 2.3 eff. days N = 1373 MW CA6 = 240 cm
2
1,2291,236
3
1,1811,205
5
0,9370,976
6
1,1011,113
8
1,2031,209
9
1,2481,253
11
1,3511,364
12
1,1341,152
13
0,9370,981
14
1,3231,332
15
1,0341,062
16
1,3581,352
17
1,3151,308
18
0,9881,006
19
0,2990,289
20
1,1341,151
21
1,3281,34
22
0,9671,006
23
1,0141,034
24
1,1741,176
25
1,3261,312
26
1,1591,139
27
0,4260,422
28
0,9370,98
29
0,9670,999
31
1,1721,168
32
1,3011,283
34
0,5630,562
35
1,3221,324
36
1,0131,04
37
1,1711,166
38
1,0521,074
39
1,2821,274
40
0,8480,818
41
0,2790,275
42
1,0331,065
43
1,1731,187
44
1,2981,281
45
1,281,265
46
0,7920,778
47
0,3330,339
48
1,3551,343
49
1,3221,307
51
0,8420,802
52
0,3330,332
53
1,3131,304
54
1,1541,151
55
0,5350,527
56
0,2780,275
57
0,9870,993
58
0,4290,421
59
0,2970,289
1
0,9680,937
4
0,9860,968
7
1,1021,04
10
0,5480,516
30
1,2961,261
33
1,1291,084
50
1,1221,069
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
kq,SCORPIO
kq,BIPR7
11
0.0000.000
18
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
20.7.2006 Tef = 2.3 eff. days N = 1373 MW CA6 = 240 cm
2
0,6
3
2,1
5
4,2
6
1,1
8
0,5
9
0,4
11
1
12
1,5
13
4,7
14
0,7
15
2,8
16
-0,5
17
-0,6
18
1,8
19
-3,4
20
1,5
21
0,9
22
4
23
2
24
0,2
25
-1
26
-1,8
27
-0,9
28
4,6
29
3,3
31
-0,4
32
-1,4
34
-0,1
35
0,2
36
2,6
37
-0,4
38
2,1
39
-0,6
40
-3,5
41
-1,2
42
3,1
43
1,2
44
-1,3
45
-1,1
46
-1,8
47
1,8
48
-0,9
49
-1,1
51
-4,8
52
-0,1
53
-0,7
54
-0,3
55
-1,5
56
-1,1
57
0,6
58
-1,7
59
-2,5
1
-3,2
4
-1,9
7
-5,6
10
-5,8
30
-2,7
33
-4
50
-4,8
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
rel. deviation = (kq,SCORPIO / kq,BIPR -1) *10011
0.000
19
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Comparsion between “experimental”(SCORPIO) and teoretical(BIPR) group kr and relative deviation2.eff.days
20.7.2006 Tef = 2.3 eff.days NR = 1373 MW h6 = 240 cm
2
1,3591,333
3
1,3131,319
5
1,0481,068
6
1,211,19
8
1,321,303
9
1,5021,498
11
1,451,441
12
1,2671,274
13
1,0441,048
14
1,4411,443
15
1,161,172
16
1,5071,469
17
1,5131,465
18
1,3371,355
19
0,4980,466
20
1,2671,274
21
1,4581,457
22
1,0641,076
23
1,1231,12
24
1,321,295
25
1,4831,441
26
1,4681,435
27
0,6810,649
28
1,0441,042
29
1,0641,053
31
1,311,275
32
1,4351,393
34
0,8330,806
35
1,4411,444
36
1,1221,13
37
1,3081,273
38
1,1471,143
39
1,4911,465
40
1,1831,08
41
0,4730,477
42
1,1581,174
43
1,3171,305
44
1,4311,387
45
1,4881,472
46
1,0841,031
47
0,5410,554
48
1,5021,459
49
1,481,436
51
1,1761,059
52
0,5450,545
53
1,511,46
54
1,4621,454
55
0,7910,748
56
0,470,472
57
1,3351,34
58
0,6850,645
59
0,4980,469
1
1,0390,991
4
1,0951,057
7
1,2241,132
10
0,8140,736
30
1,4131,377
33
1,3821,278
50
1,3771,263
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
kr,SCORPIO
kr,BIPR7
11
0.0000.000
20
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
20.7.2006 Tef = 2.3 eff.days NR = 1373 MW h6 = 240 cm
2
-1,9
3
0,4
5
1,9
6
-1,7
8
-1,3
9
-0,3
11
-0,6
12
0,6
13
0,4
14
0,2
15
1
16
-2,5
17
-3,2
18
1,3
19
-6,4
20
0,6
21
-0,1
22
1,1
23
-0,3
24
-1,9
25
-2,8
26
-2,3
27
-4,7
28
-0,2
29
-1
31
-2,7
32
-3
34
-3,3
35
0,2
36
0,7
37
-2,7
38
-0,4
39
-1,8
40
-8,8
41
0,9
42
1,4
43
-0,9
44
-3,1
45
-1,1
46
-4,9
47
2,5
48
-2,9
49
-3
51
-9,9
52
0
53
-3,3
54
-0,6
55
-5,4
56
0,5
57
0,4
58
-5,8
59
-5,7
1
-4,7
4
-3,5
7
-7,6
10
-9,6
30
-2,6
33
-7,5
50
-8,3
GD II fuel profil.fuel
number of group
rel. deviation = (kr,SCORPIO / kr,BIPR -1) *10011
0.000
21
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Comparsion between experimental(SCORPIO) and teoretical(BIPR) group kq and relative deviation40.eff.days
27.8.2006 Tef = 40,4 eff. days NR = 1373 MW h6 = 225 cm
2
1.2051.2
3
1.1641.181
5
0.9420.981
6
1.1021.109
8
1.1861.198
9
1.2521.26
11
1.3271.332
12
1.1271.14
13
0.9410.985
14
1.341.35
15
1.0291.054
16
1.3381.333
17
1.2981.307
18
0.9951.027
19
0.3060.297
20
1.1271.14
21
1.3441.355
22
0.9761.017
23
1.0161.035
24
1.1651.173
25
1.3091.302
26
1.1641.132
27
0.4350.431
28
0.9410.985
29
0.9761.006
31
1.171.167
32
1.2911.273
34
0.570.571
35
1.341.346
36
1.0151.052
37
1.1691.163
38
1.0481.079
39
1.2941.29
40
0.8550.817
41
0.2870.282
42
1.0281.055
43
1.1631.17
44
1.2881.276
45
1.2911.274
46
0.8020.793
47
0.3430.349
48
1.3341.317
49
1.3041.297
51
0.8490.812
52
0.3410.341
53
1.2961.294
54
1.1581.165
55
0.5420.533
56
0.2860.282
57
0.9940.991
58
0.4370.423
59
0.3050.295
1
0.950.909
4
0.9920.964
7
1.0921.027
10
0.5570.528
30
1.3161.276
33
1.1261.082
50
1.1191.074
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
kq,SCORPIO
kq,BIPR7
11
0.0000.000
22
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
20.7.2006 Tef = 2.3 eff. days N = 1373 MW CA6 = 240 cm
номер кассеты
2
0,6
3
2,1
5
4,2
6
1,1
8
0,5
9
0,4
11
1
12
1,5
13
4,7
14
0,7
15
2,8
16
-0,5
17
-0,6
18
1,8
19
-3,4
20
1,5
21
0,9
22
4
23
2
24
0,2
25
-1
26
-1,8
27
-0,9
28
4,6
29
3,3
31
-0,4
32
-1,4
34
-0,1
35
0,2
36
2,6
37
-0,4
38
2,1
39
-0,6
40
-3,5
41
-1,2
42
3,1
43
1,2
44
-1,3
45
-1,1
46
-1,8
47
1,8
48
-0,9
49
-1,1
51
-4,8
52
-0,1
53
-0,7
54
-0,3
55
-1,5
56
-1,1
57
0,6
58
-1,7
59
-2,5
1
-3,2
4
-1,9
7
-5,6
10
-5,8
30
-2,7
33
-4
50
-4,8
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
rel. deviation = (kq,SCORPIO / kq,BIPR -1) *10011
0.000
23
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Comparsion between “experimental”(SCORPIO) and teoretical(BIPR) group kr and relative deviation40.eff.days
27.8.2006 Tef = 40,4 eff.days NR = 1373 MW h6 = 225 cm
2
1.3321.308
3
1.2831.296
5
1.0561.084
6
1.2031.192
8
1.2951.3
9
1.491.5
11
1.4211.419
12
1.2461.265
13
1.0451.068
14
1.4521.461
15
1.1471.17
16
1.4871.465
17
1.481.472
18
1.3321.378
19
0.5090.479
20
1.2471.267
21
1.461.462
22
1.0751.098
23
1.1191.128
24
1.31.295
25
1.4571.439
26
1.4611.427
27
0.6920.662
28
1.0451.063
29
1.0751.071
31
1.2991.28
32
1.4161.391
34
0.8380.817
35
1.4521.462
36
1.1181.152
37
1.2971.275
38
1.1441.155
39
1.491.483
40
1.1881.079
41
0.4830.488
42
1.1451.17
43
1.2981.291
44
1.4121.39
45
1.4861.474
46
1.0961.054
47
0.5530.572
48
1.4821.446
49
1.4531.434
51
1.1811.075
52
0.5560.56
53
1.4771.457
54
1.4551.476
55
0.7960.757
56
0.4790.485
57
1.331.332
58
0.6930.648
59
0.5080.478
1
1.0190.97
4
1.0921.055
7
1.2091.123
10
0.8250.755
30
1.4191.367
33
1.3671.281
50
1.3611.275
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
kr,SCORPIO
kr,BIPR7
11
0.0000.000
24
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
27.8.2006 Tef = 40,4 eff.days NR = 1373 MW h6 = 225 cm
2
-1.8
3
1
5
2.6
6
-0.9
8
0.3
9
0.6
11
-0.2
12
1.5
13
2.2
14
0.6
15
2
16
-1.5
17
-0.6
18
3.4
19
-5.9
20
1.6
21
0.1
22
2.2
23
0.8
24
-0.4
25
-1.3
26
-2.4
27
-4.3
28
1.7
29
-0.4
31
-1.5
32
-1.8
34
-2.5
35
0.7
36
3
37
-1.7
38
1
39
-0.5
40
-9.2
41
1
42
2.2
43
-0.5
44
-1.6
45
-0.8
46
-3.8
47
3.5
48
-2.4
49
-1.3
51
-9
52
0.7
53
-1.4
54
1.4
55
-4.9
56
1.2
57
0.1
58
-6.4
59
-5.9
1
-4.9
4
-3.4
7
-7.1
10
-8.5
30
-3.7
33
-6.3
50
-6.3
GD II fuel profil.fuel
number of group
rel. deviation = (kr,SCORPIO / kr,BIPR -1) *10011
0.000
25
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
4.1 Operation with Gd II fuel 23.cycle 3.unit Bohunice NPP
2
20
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
191817161514131211
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
34333231302928
36 37 38 39 40 41
4746
5251504948
45444342
53 54 55 56
57 58
59
35
Core loading pattern
ENRICHMENT
ENRICHMENT
ENRICHMENT
26
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Physical start-up resultsDuration: from 2.9.2006 10.26 to 4.9.2006 5.10
Theoretical Experimental Deviation CriteriaCritical concentration H3BO3 in PC [g/kg] 7.62 7.9 0.28 ±0.4 g/kgAsymetry coeficients min 1 0.981 -0.019 -7%rel
max 1 1.024 0.024 7%relAsyptotic period min - - -10.70% -30%rel
max - - 14.70% 30%rel200 [OC] -0.77 -0.77 0 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC210 -0.88 -0.94 0.06 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC220 -1.01 -1.11 0.1 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC
Temperature reactivity coefficient [10-2%/oC] 230 -1.16 -1.28 0.12 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC240 -1.32 -1.45 0.13 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC250 -1.5 -1.62 0.12 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC260 -1.69 -1.79 0.1 ±0.4*10-2 %/oC
CA system total worth [%] 10.52 11 4.60% ±21%relCA system total worth with CA 03-46 stuck[%] 7.43 7.74 4.20% ±20%relWorth of "ejected" CA 06-49 [%] 0.45 0.42 -6.70% ±20%relCA drop time [s] 8 to 13 10.2 to 11.6 - from 8 to 13 sBoron acid worth [%kg/g] -1.47 -1.35 8.20% ±17%relWorth of working CA [%] 0.83 0.94 -13.30% ±17%relIsothermal state TČ - < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
OT - < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
27
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Maximal radial assembly-wise power peaking factors kq
11/5
11/5
11/5
21/621/621/6
44
44
44
44
11
111111
11
21
21
21
21
2121212121
1.3
1.32
1.34
1.36
1.38
1.4
1.42
1.44
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Tef [dni]
kq
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
kq max. I.generation
kq max. II.generation
kq max. I. generation BIPR
kq max. II.generation BIPR
Power
Comparsion BIPR-SCORPIO
28
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Pin-wise power peaking factors kr
8
17
17
17
17
17171717
17/117/617/1
9/59/59/5
9
99999
99
9
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
1.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Eff.days
kr
kr max. I.generation BIPR
kr max.I.generation
kr max II.generation
kr max. II.generation BIPR
Comparsion BIPR-SCORPIO
29
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Maximal linear power qlin
17/117/117/617/6
17/117/117/1
17/1
9/49/49/5
9/59/5
9/5
9/59/5
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Eff.days
qlin
[W/c
m]
I.generation
II.generation
Limit for I.generation
Limit for II.generation
30
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Comparsion between experimental(SCORPIO) and teoretical(BIPR) group kq and relative deviation5.eff.days
10.9.2006 Tef = 4.9 eff.days NR = 1375 MW h6 = 220 cm
2
1.2271.216
3
1.1871.213
5
0.8870.92
6
1.0641.052
8
1.3331.324
9
1.2691.266
11
1.3741.388
12
1.1431.157
13
0.9771.014
14
1.3091.322
15
0.9981.028
16
1.1991.196
17
1.3261.34
18
0.9971.022
19
0.3060.304
20
1.1431.156
21
1.3431.364
22
0.9751.02
23
1.0161.047
24
1.1971.218
25
1.3291.319
26
1.1611.131
27
0.4290.425
28
0.9771.005
29
0.9751.012
31
1.1711.185
32
1.3451.351
34
0.540.531
35
1.3091.321
36
1.0161.04
37
1.1711.182
38
1.0581.112
39
1.2881.282
40
0.8470.804
41
0.2790.275
42
0.9961.019
43
1.1961.221
44
1.3461.332
45
1.2871.276
46
0.7630.741
47
0.3270.329
48
1.1981.187
49
1.3261.344
51
0.8440.791
52
0.3270.322
53
1.3221.327
54
1.1551.143
55
0.5250.504
56
0.2770.274
57
0.9940.986
58
0.4260.416
59
0.3040.292
1
0.9850.896
4
1.0871.056
7
0.9920.869
10
0.5680.545
30
1.2971.275
33
1.1421.101
50
1.1391.095
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
kq,SCORPIO
kq,BIPR7
11
0.0000.000
31
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
10.9.2006 Tef = 4.9 eff.days NR = 1375 MW h6 = 220 cm
2
-0.9
3
2.2
5
3.7
6
-1.1
8
-0.7
9
-0.2
11
1
12
1.2
13
3.7
14
1
15
3
16
-0.2
17
1.1
18
2.5
19
-0.6
20
1.1
21
1.6
22
4.6
23
3.1
24
1.8
25
-0.8
26
-2.6
27
-0.8
28
2.9
29
3.8
31
1.2
32
0.4
34
-1.6
35
0.9
36
2.3
37
1
38
5.1
39
-0.5
40
-5
41
-1.4
42
2.3
43
2.1
44
-1.1
45
-0.9
46
-2.9
47
0.8
48
-0.9
49
1.3
51
-6.3
52
-1.5
53
0.4
54
-1
55
-3.9
56
-0.8
57
-0.8
58
-2.4
59
-3.9
1
-9.1
4
-2.9
7
-12.4
10
-4
30
-1.7
33
-3.6
50
-3.9
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
rel. deviation = (kq,SCORPIO / kq,BIPR -1) *10011
0.000
32
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Comparsion between “experimental”(SCORPIO) and teoretical(BIPR) group kr and relative deviation5.eff.days
10.9.2006 Tef = 4.9 eff.days NR = 1375 MW h6 = 220 cm
2
1.361.323
3
1.3131.312
5
0.9670.995
6
1.1581.122
8
1.4431.416
9
1.541.522
11
1.4691.461
12
1.2951.281
13
1.0861.081
14
1.4051.439
15
1.1091.134
16
1.3571.334
17
1.4911.47
18
1.3441.372
19
0.5080.488
20
1.2951.279
21
1.4781.476
22
1.061.078
23
1.1341.148
24
1.3671.358
25
1.471.428
26
1.4661.422
27
0.6830.656
28
1.0851.071
29
1.0591.064
31
1.2941.295
32
1.4651.455
34
0.7990.764
35
1.4041.42
36
1.1331.144
37
1.2931.291
38
1.1491.188
39
1.5071.476
40
1.1881.068
41
0.4780.474
42
1.1071.123
43
1.3651.363
44
1.4651.431
45
1.5071.493
46
1.0720.992
47
0.5370.542
48
1.3551.323
49
1.4681.456
51
1.1851.052
52
0.5360.53
53
1.4861.456
54
1.4611.438
55
0.7850.725
56
0.4740.473
57
1.3411.325
58
0.6820.639
59
0.5120.475
1
1.060.948
4
1.2251.153
7
1.1230.969
10
0.8450.775
30
1.4091.387
33
1.4081.305
50
1.4061.3
GD II fuel profil. fuel
number of group
kr,SCORPIO
kr,BIPR7
11
0.0000.000
33
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
10.9.2006 Tef = 4.9 eff.days NR = 1375 MW h6 = 220 cm
2
-2.8
3
-0.1
5
2.9
6
-3.1
8
-1.9
9
-1.2
11
-0.6
12
-1.1
13
-0.5
14
2.4
15
2.3
16
-1.7
17
-1.4
18
2.1
19
-3.9
20
-1.2
21
-0.1
22
1.7
23
1.2
24
-0.7
25
-2.9
26
-3
27
-4
28
-1.3
29
0.5
31
0.1
32
-0.7
34
-4.4
35
1.1
36
1
37
-0.2
38
3.3
39
-2.1
40
-10.1
41
-0.8
42
1.5
43
-0.1
44
-2.4
45
-0.9
46
-7.5
47
1
48
-2.4
49
-0.8
51
-11.2
52
-1.2
53
-2
54
-1.6
55
-7.7
56
-0.1
57
-1.2
58
-6.3
59
-7.2
1
-10.6
4
-5.9
7
-13.7
10
-8.3
30
-1.6
33
-7.3
50
-7.5
GD II fuel profil.fuel
number of group
rel. deviation = (kr,SCORPIO / kr,BIPR -1) *10011
0.000
34
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
5.Conclusion
-The close changes of fuel cycle in Bohunice V-2 NPP is expected in connection with increase of the reactor power to 107% in 2010
- Choice of supplier and fuel licensing took aproximately four years. - Diferencies between theoretical(BIPR7) and experimental values measured during
physical start-up are not significant.- Diferencies between theoretical(BIPR7) and „experimental“(SCORPIO-MOBYDICK)
values are not significant up to the moment.
35
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
THANK YOU FOR YOU ATTENTION!
Presentation prepare:O.Grežďo
References:M.Antal,M.Kačmar – fuel cycles,licensing
V.Mráz – 4.unit,SCORPIOO.Grežďo – 3.unit
36
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Fig. 1 Summary of Bohunice V-2 NPP fuel cycle.Weight of fresh fuel for FPD and burn up of discharged fuel.
37
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Fig.2 Number of leakage FA – 3. and 4.UNIT
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
блок № 3
блок № 4
0
1
2
3
4
5
год
блок № 3
блок № 4числ
о не
плот
ных ка
ссет
year
Num
bero
flea
kage
FA
unit 3.
unit 4.
unit 3.unit 4.
38
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Fig 3. Screen - Power distribution (system tests)
39
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Fig.4 Screen – Strategy generator
40
SLOVENSKÉELEKTRÁRNE
Fig.5 Screen – Limit checking(system test)