Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006 DNA Barcoding: An Emerging Global Standard for Species...
-
Upload
aubrey-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006 DNA Barcoding: An Emerging Global Standard for Species...
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
DNA Barcoding: An Emerging Global Standard for Species
IdentificationConsortium for the Barcode of Life
National Museum of Natural HistorySmithsonian Institution
http://www.barcoding.si.edu202/633-0808; fax 202/633-2938
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
A DNA barcode is a short gene sequence
taken from standardized portions
of the genome, used to identify species
The Mitochondrial Genome
Cyt bCyt b
D-Loop
ND5
H-strand
ND4
ND4LND3
COIII
COICOIL-strand
ND6
COI
ND2
ND1
COII
Small ribosomal RNA
Large ribosomal RNA
ATPase subunit 8
ATPase subunit 6
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Uses of DNA BarcodesApplied tool for identifying regulated species:• Disease vectors, agricultural pests, invasives• Environmental indicators, protected species • Using minimal samples, damaged specimens, gut
contents, droppings
Research tool for improving species-level taxonomy:• Associating all life history stages, genders• Testing species boundaries, finding new variants
“Triage” tool for flagging potential new species:• Undescribed and cryptic species
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Using DNA Barcodes• Establish reference library of barcodes
from identified voucher specimens• If necessary, revise species limits• Then:
– Identify unknowns by searching against reference sequences
– Look for matches (mismatches) against ‘library on a chip’
– Before long: Analyze relative abundance in multi-species samples
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Reactions to Barcoding: 2004• From ecologists and other users:
“This is what we need! How soon can we get started?”
• From traditional taxonomists:“Species should be based on lots of characters, not just barcodes”
• From forward-looking taxonomists:“Using molecular data as species diagnostics isn’t
new, but standardization and broad implementation are great!”
• From barcoding practitioners:“I had my doubts at the beginning, but it really works
as a tool for identification (96% accurate in a recent mollusc paper) and it is at least as good as traditional approaches to discovering new species.”
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
What DNA Barcoding is NOT• Barcoding is not DNA taxonomy; no
single gene (or character) is adequate• Barcoding is not Tree of Life; barcode
clusters are not phylogenetic trees• Barcoding is not just COI; standardizing
on one region has benefits and limits• Molecules in taxonomy is not new; but
large-scale and standardization are new• Barcoding can help to create a 21st
century research environment for taxonomy
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
What DNA Barcoding is NOT• Barcoding is not DNA taxonomy; no
single gene (or character) is adequate• Barcoding is not Tree of Life; barcode
clusters are not phylogenetic trees• Barcoding is not just COI; standardizing
on one region has benefits and limits• Molecules in taxonomy is not new; but
large-scale and standardization are new• BUT…Barcoding can help to create a
21st century research environment for taxonomy
Barcode Sequence
Voucher Specimen
Species Name
Specimen Metadata
Literature(link to content or
citation)
BARCODE Data Standard
Indices - Catalog of Life - GBIF/ECAT
Nomenclators - Zoo Record - IPNI
NameBank
Publication links - New species
GeoreferenceHabitatCharacter setsImagesBehaviorOther genes
Trace files
Other Databases
PhylogeneticPop’n GeneticsEcological
Primers
Current Norm: High throughput
ABI 3100 capillary
automated sequencer
Large capacity PCR and
sequencing reactions
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Fresh/Frozen Museum
Tissue Sampling $0.41 $0.41
DNA Extraction $0.34 $2.00
PCR Amplification $0.24 $0.48
PCR Product Check $0.35 $0.70
Cycle Sequencing $1.04 $2.08
Sequencing Cleanup $0.32 $0.64
Sequence $0.40 $0.80
Total: $3.10 $7.11
Cost of Reagents and Disposables
Producing Barcode Data: 2008 Faster, more portable: Hundreds of samples per hour
Integrated DNA microchips Table-top microfluidic systems
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Reference vs. Micro-Barcodes
• BARCODE reference records– Adhere to data standards– Bidirectional reads, 500+ bp long– Linked to voucher, species name
• Query barcode records– Used in BLAST or other searches– Often single pass reads– Often very short – 100+ bp for good IDs– Can cost less than $2, take less than 6 hours
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Producing Barcode Data: 2010?Barcode data anywhere, instantly
• Data in seconds to minutes
• Pennies per sample
• Link to reference database
• A taxonomic GPS• Usable by non-
specialists
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL)
• First barcoding publications in 2002• Cold Spring Harbor planning workshops in 2003• Sloan Foundation grant, launch in May 2004• Secretariat opens at Smithsonian, September 2004• First international conference February 2005• Now an international affiliation of:
– 130+ Members Org’s, 40 countries, 6 continents– Natural history museums, biodiversity organizations– Users: e.g., government agencies– Private sector biotech companies, database providers
CBOL Member Organizations June 2006: 120 Member Organizations, 40 countries
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
CBOL’s Underlying Principles• Standardization, cost-effectiveness
• Minimalism (scientific) – short sequence
• Global participation
• Tangible, realistic goals, near-term results
• Respond to applied user communities
• Minimalisim (organizational) – Coordination/Facilitation of Bottom-Up activities, build on existing activities, avoid new ones
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
CBOL’s Working Groups
• Database: Designing/constructing the Barcode Section of GenBank
• DNA: Protocols for formalin-fixed and old museum specimens; advice to new labs
• Data Analysis: Beyond phenetic methods; population genetics perspective
• Plants: Identify gene region(s) for barcoding
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Outreach to Developing Countries
• Regional meetings in:– Cape Town, South Africa, 7-8 April 2006, SANBI– Nairobi, Kenya, 18-19 October 2006, NMK– Sao Paolo, Brazil, February 2007, INPA– Southern Asia, 2nd quarter 2007
• Second International Barcode Conference– Singapore, 13-15 June 2007
• Support from CBOL, host governments and international development agencies
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Goals of Regional Meetings
• Raise awareness
• Explore potential applications in the region
• Assess greatest needs and opportunities in the region
• Identify highest priorities, construct national and regional action plans
• Start intra-regional networks and intercontinental partnerships
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Current and Planned Projects
• Four Working Groups
• FishBOL and All Birds Initiatives
• Developing “Demonstrator Systems by 2008
• African Scale Insect Barcoding Initiative (planned at Cape Town Regional Meeting)
• International Network for Barcoding Invasive and Pest Species (INBIPS)
• Forming a Conservation Committee
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Demonstrator DevelopmentGOAL: By June 2008, create an operational
system for global ID of an important group• Mosquitoes (disease vectors)
– Barcode 85% (2932) of 3449 known species– Minimum 5 specimens per species– Reliance on archival collections
• Tephritid fruit flies (agricultural pests)– Barcode 2000 species of 4500, 5 per species– All pests and beneficials, with closest relatives– Invasive non-destructive sampling of existing
collections
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
ABBI and FISH-BOL• Global initiatives to create reference library
• Enable users to adopt barcode ID systems
• All-species barcode database will:– Strengthen specimen/species data– Improve collections, tissue/DNA resources– Attract users to barcoding for specimen IDs
• Regional Working Groups
• Small Steering Committee and CBOL
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
BoLD Data System• Developed/hosted by Univ. Guelph
• Workbench for most barcode projects
• Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) for assembling data
• Management and Analysis System
• Identification system for matching unknowns to reference records
• Uploading to GenBank
IDS – Identification System
Linkage to Mapping System
Utah State University – 29 Nov 2006
Launching CBOL Projects
Assembling Steering Committee– Users– Taxonomists, collection curators– Service providers (BoLD, analytical labs)
• Plan for scope, timetable, logistics
• Pilot tests of primers, PCR amplification
• Assemble pipeline of specimens to lab
DNA from identified voucher
Create BARCODE reference record
ID unknownsRefine taxonomy of group
DNA from identified adult
voucher
Create BARCODE reference records
Associate immatures with names
ID unknowns
Refine taxonomy of group
DNA from unidentified immature specimen
Repository of provisional vouchers
Add names to vouchered immatures