LIGHT M A P s Meaningful Applications of Physical Science Email: [email protected].
Using Self-Study to Explore Meaningful Physical Education ...€¦ · Web viewUsing Self-Study to...
Transcript of Using Self-Study to Explore Meaningful Physical Education ...€¦ · Web viewUsing Self-Study to...
Running head: Meaningful Physical Education 1
Using Self-Study to Explore Meaningful Physical Education Experiences
for Elementary Students
Todd Van Ritchie
St. Francis Xavier University
Submitted to Prof. Dan MacDonald
EDUC 593: Capping Experience
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 2
Table of Contents
Abstract................................................................................................................................5
Using Self-Study to Explore Meaningful Physical Education Experiences for Elementary
Students ...........................................................................................................................................7
Section 1: Autobiographical Account..................................................................................7
Critical Praxis..................................................................................................................8
Self-Study and Refection.............................................................................................9
Quality Teaching............................................................................................................11
Creating Meaningful Physical Education......................................................................12
Statement of Problem....................................................................................................12
Purpose..........................................................................................................................12
Reflective Questions......................................................................................................13
Section 2: Literature Review.............................................................................................13
Search Protocol..............................................................................................................13
Self-Study......................................................................................................................15
Critical Friends..............................................................................................................17
Value Orientation...........................................................................................................18
Effective or Quality Teaching?......................................................................................19
Meaningful Physical Education.....................................................................................22
Section 3: Inquiry Plan......................................................................................................22
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 3
Self-Study Design..........................................................................................................22
Framework-for-Inquiry..............................................................................................22
Quality Indicators for the Teacher Research..............................................................22
Methods.........................................................................................................................22
Timeline.....................................................................................................................22
Data Collection..........................................................................................................22
Data Analysis.................................................................................................................22
Coding........................................................................................................................22
Credibility and Trustworthiness.................................................................................22
Ethical Considerations...............................................................................................22
Ethics in Practice.......................................................................................................22
Section 4: Findings and Discussion...................................................................................22
Reflections on my Practice............................................................................................23
Value orientation........................................................................................................23
Being a leader of change............................................................................................25
Can you create meaningfulness in every lesson, for every student?.............................28
Student voice - Are current approaches meaningful to “the students”?........................30
Explicitly planning for meaningful experiences............................................................31
Student choice............................................................................................................31
Section 5: Final Reflection................................................................................................39
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 4
References..........................................................................................................................45
Footnotes............................................................................................................................54
Tables.................................................................................................................................55
.......................................................................................................................................58
Figures...............................................................................................................................66
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 5
Abstract
“Physical education instructors are in the interesting position of being only marginally related to
education”. This quote from R. Barrow in the 1981 book The Philosophy of Schooling is a
telling example of how Physical Education, and all of the benefits derived from it, can be
marginalized and ignored. As a practicing Physical Educator, it is imperative to be able to not
only defend the need for Physical Education in the public-school system, but to advocate for it.
This means, among other things, (1) effectively teaching the students so that they achieve
success, and (2) creating positive, meaningful experiences for the students, so that the want to
achieve success. Therefore, curricular decisions are important and can affect the learning that
takes place in the gymnasium. What the educator values will play a key role in the curricular
decisions concerning content selection, assessment, classroom climate, and the goals of the
program. Correspondingly, what the students value and how they create meaning from the
program can be equally critical to the success of all in the gymnasium. With the support of a
critical friend, a non-participant observer, and the inclusion of student voice, an experienced
physical educator is using the reflective practice of self-study methodology based on LaBoskey’s
criteria for quality self-study research design: (a) self-initiated and self-focused, (b)
improvement-aimed, (c) interactive, (d) using multiple forms of qualitative data, and (e)
demonstrating validity based in trustworthiness. This research will delve into an analyse of his
curricular values with respect to creating meaningful physical education experiences for the
elementary aged students. Data from the self-study will indicate whether student perceptions of
meaningfulness in PE are congruent with those of the teacher-researcher and may ultimately help
to determine if prioritising meaningfulness will foster experiences for the students that encourage
engagement in learning and help to contribute to the value and worth of the physical education
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 6
experience in public schools. Future work related to this self-study can look to examine the
quality of experience and meaningfulness of PE experiences for small groups of students.
Specifically, investigations could focus could be on race (African Nova Scotian, Aboriginal,
Asian, Middle Eastern…), gender (male, female, other…), social class (lower, middle, upper…)
or disabilities that affect participation and learning in PE (autistic spectrum, physical disability,
various syndromes…)
Keywords: Meaningfulness, self-study, pedagogy, elementary
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 7
Using Self-Study to Explore Meaningful Physical Education Experiences
for Elementary Students
Section 1: Autobiographical Account
As we move forward in these times of educational funding cutbacks, attacks on
public education and changes to the system it becomes ever more critical for physical educators
to treat physical education like any other academic program with regard to their curricular
decisions. Teachers need to bring credibility to their program, demonstrate accountability, make
learning meaningful and engaging, and communicate student achievement to the
parents/guardians (Darst & Pangrazi, 2002; Pangrazi & Beighle, 2010). The idea of having to
defend physical education is at the forefront of many a physical educators mind. Too often the
“academic” aspects of physical education (PE) are overshadowed by the thoughts and beliefs that
it is simply play time in the gym. Richard Bailey (2018) discussed this concept in his paper
“Sport, Physical Education and Educational Worth”, going so far as the create Tiers of
importance for subjects. In his discussion he lists physical education last, as a Tier 4 subject. He
goes on to refer to the words of Barrow that “physical education instructors are in the interesting
position of being only marginally related to education”. (as cited in Bailey, 2018, p.52) After
pages of back and forth debate of philosophies, positions, beliefs and models Bailey concludes
with a statement that “when informed by empirical research into the outcomes of positive
participation in physical activities, the need for experiences at school that focus on the
90
91
92
93
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 8
development and expression of the body in different ways becomes clearer and more
compelling.” (Bailey, 2018, p.63)
With this ever-present, undesirable attitude toward PE that exists in general, and
specifically in my school, though not to a terrible degree, I feel it is imperative that I am able to
not only defend the need for physical education, but advocate for why it is critical, and what
makes it critical in child development. This means, among other things, (1) effectively teaching
my students so that they achieve success, and (2) creating positive, meaningful experiences for
my students. Therefore, my curricular decisions are important and can affect the learning that
takes place in the gymnasium. What I value plays a key role in the curricular decisions
concerning content selection, assessment, classroom climate, and goals for the program.
Correspondingly, what the students value and how they create meaning from the program can be
equally critical to our success in the gymnasium. Any possible disconnect between my values as
an educator and student values presents an interesting dilemma for a self-study of my teaching
practice.
Critical Praxis
In Conceptualising teacher education and research as ‘critical praxis’, Julie
Arnold, Tony Edwards, Neil Hooley and Jo Williams (2012) provide a description of critical
praxis that fits with the intentions of this self-study. They state that “Critical praxis for educators
seeks to move beyond the constraints of formal teaching, knowledge and curriculum and instead
encourages communities, teachers and students to work together in producing new
understandings and practices” (p.281) This encapsulates precisely what I am looking to achieve
through this self-study and reflection on my practice. By focusing on the sharing of personal
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 9
values (of educator and of students), and the meaningfulness of experiences in the physical
education program, I hope to gain a better understanding and determination of the quality of the
teaching taking place in my gymnasium.
Self-Study and Refection
A reflective practitioner uses reflection as an action to engage in the process of
continuous learning. It involves learning from your professional experiences, rather than from
formal learning methods. It is an important way to bring together theory and practice, as through
reflection, the educator can attribute language and theory to his/her personal practice. It is not
just a process of looking back on past actions but a conscious effort to look at emotions,
experiences, actions, responses and outcomes of activities and lessons, then using this
information to reach a higher level of understanding of your practice.
Excluding those educators that will not reflect on their practice (either because
they do not know how, do not know what to reflect on, do not want to challenge their current
beliefs, or simply do not care to), I think that the largest impediment to proper reflective practice
is the time it takes to properly work through the exercise. Time is already at a premium during a
teaching day and the added time for reflection is often just not there. With that in mind I feel that
there are three levels to the reality of reflective practice.
The first level is the easiest and most often used. This happens on the spot, in
lesson reflections on what is happening and how you can modify the activity or lesson
immediately to better achieve your goals for that lesson. This is situational and often will help to
address problems arising either within the activity itself or in the resulting student
experiences/behaviours.
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 10
The second level is an extension of the first and basically involves taking the
modifications from the reflection during a previous class and applying these changes and
improvements to the next class.
The third level is the least used and the most difficult to develop. This is reflecting
afterwards on how a lesson, class, unit, or program went, then taking the reflective thoughts and
applying them to future planning. This is a true reflective practitioner and this person allocates
time and energy to the process of reflecting on their practice. This can be done in a number of
ways and is likely an exercise in trial and error. Typical methods of reflecting would be
journaling, collaborative journal writing, self-assessment forms, video recording of teaching,
peer review, mentor/protégé experiences, student feedback, concept mapping, brainstorming, free
writing, and problem solving.
Self-Study provides a model of reflection that I can use to help to define and
organize my thoughts and observations.
Critical Friends.
In recent years, I have spent significant time reflecting on my teaching values and
curricular decisions regarding content, assessment and goals for my program. To this end I have
worked to create and maintain an informal physical education teachers professional learning
community (PEPLC) with other elementary physical educators in my area. Through this group I
have been able to extend my personal reflection to include reflection on the discussions I have
with other physical educators regarding their teaching. Additionally, this group has provided a
close-knit group of colleagues that can be turned to in times of need and questioning. These
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 11
people provide critical and constructive feedback on questions for each other in the group and
together we are able to resolve queries and issues.
Value Orientation.
Throughout my career I have come across a large variety of approaches to
teaching physical education. Each of these different teachers valued vastly different aspects of a
physical education program. While these experiences happened over all grade levels, from P-12,
and over the course of a few years, I believe that they informed my personal values decisions and
values orientation as a physical education teacher currently at the elementary level. In my
experience teachers can discuss and converse about all of the proper topics, using the key words
and hitting all the important points, but when the gym doors close and it is just the teacher and
the class, what actually happens may be a fair bit different. I know that personally, there are days
that what I value in a physical education program and what I end up doing in the gym can be on
opposite ends of the spectrum for any number of reasons.
Quality Teaching
I believe that typically the program I offer students in the gymnasium is excellent.
I work to constantly provide new experiences and try to be as innovative in my approach as
possible. I believe that my content knowledge is excellent with regard to the curriculum,
fundamental movement skills and sport. I endeavor to give students choice and freedom to
explore and experience their learning at their own pace and in their own ways. I work hard to
incorporate technology in the gym and can confidently state I have never taught the same thing,
the same way twice.
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 12
I definitely have areas where I need to improve, and gym management is one. I
am constantly looking for the best routines and strategies to manage students through transitions
and in activities. Another area that I struggle with is the need to expose students to so many
outcomes or indicators of learning as I feel it “waters down” their ability to earn anything. This
leads to personal reflection on how whether or not I am actually achieving any learning in the
gym and is what I am able to achieve even relevant to the students?
Creating Meaningful Physical Education
My personal beliefs concerning what should be taught and how it should happen
in elementary physical education have, until recently, been divergent from the official
curriculum. Throughout, my years in education, both informal as an outdoor educator in the
recreation field, and formal as a physical educator, I have believed that experiential, student
centered, choice-based programs which focused on the development of fundamental skills was
important. In fact, a planned for goal of my outdoor education programs was to create “memories
that last a lifetime”.
Finding the work of Dr. Tim Fletcher and his research partners this year has been
an almost life changing experience in that I find it reinforces and gave language to everything I
have always found to be critically important in elementary PE.
Statement of Problem
The problem I face on a daily basis could be described as a “tug of war” between
all of the things I am supposed to be teaching the students in physical education; what I believe
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 13
to be the most critical skills I should be teaching; how I should go about educating the students;
and, if any of it is even relevant and meaningful to the students?
Purpose
The purpose of this self-study is to explore, through reflection, personal
observation, discussions with critical friends, and interactions with students, what I value in
physical education and how these values support the development of a quality teaching practice
by providing meaningful physical education experiences for all students.
Reflective Questions
1. What are my goals and expectations for the students in the elementary physical education
program?
2. Why are these goals valued? Do they inform the curricular decisions I make while also
aligning with the Nova Scotia P-3 and 4-6 curriculum documents?
3. What is my value orientation? Does it align with providing meaningful physical
education experiences to my students?
4. Are my current practices in physical education creating meaningful experiences for all
students? How do I know?
This research may be seen as significant for the understanding of my curricular
decision making as it pertains to creating meaningful experiences for students in my physical
education programs. Given that the experiences of students are contingent upon the content they
are exposed to and that content is at the discretion of the physical educator, then knowing why I
make these curricular or pedagogical decisions should inform the planning-teaching process.
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 14
Moreover, other elementary physical educators may be able to take this research and transfer the
ideas, thoughts, reflections and concepts to their own practice thereby helping to create
meaningful experiences for their students.
Section 2: Literature Review
Search Protocol
A search of the literature related to meaningful physical education, self-study and
pedagogy was conducted using three electronic databases; SPORTDiscus, JSTOR and ProQuest.
Additionally, a search in Google Scholar was performed. These databases were selected based on
their comprehensive social science libraries that include literature specific to physical education,
education and teacher education. The searches were limited to full text, peer reviewed articles
published in English after January 1, 2010 using the following search criteria (a) meaningful and
“physical education”, (b) “self-study” and “physical education”, (c) pedagogy and “physical
education” in the article Abstract. (variances listed below) For a flowchart of the search protocol
refer to Figure 1.
a) JSTOR – search field ALL, in subject “Education” = 98 articles
ProQuest – in subject “Physical Education” = 20 articles
SPORTDiscus - in Subject: Thesaurus Term “Physical Education” = 33 articles
b) JSTOR – search field ALL, in subject “Education” = 164 articles
ProQuest search field ALL = 50 articles
SPORTDiscus – in Subject: Thesaurus Term “Physical Education” = 19 articles
c) JSTOR – search field ALL in subject Education = 116 articles
ProQuest = 34 articles
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 15
SPORTDiscus - in Subject: Thesaurus Term “Physical Education” = 66 articles
Once all database searches were completed, three Google Scholar searches using
the same criteria were conducted that resulted in many article possibilities. After scanning the
search results for the first 3 pages of each search no significant new articles were discovered or
added to the group for review beyond a cursory read of their title.
From the database search 130 titles were selected for a closer review. Of these 46
were duplicate articles. At this point in the review I added 8 published articles by Dr. Tim
Fletcher and his partners found on his LAMPE project website and 11 articles found in links in
the LAMPE blog. This left 103 articles that were then found online through the saved citations in
RefWorks or from the LAMPE website. These abstracts were examined, and 57 articles were
deemed to be irrelevant to the research. Related article suggestions from Taylor & Francis Online
added a new batch of 17 articles for abstract review. Upon closer inspection of these articles 13
more were added from references and 22 were found to not be relevant for the research. This left
54 articles to be considered for the final research. Additionally, 18 articles that I had previously
read were added to the final review as I believed that they could be pertinent to the topic of the
research.
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 16
Figure 1: Search Protocol Flowchart
Self-Study
There is a need for educators to take a reflective look at their practice, to gain a
deeper understanding of what they are doing, what they are teaching and what they are hoping to
have students learn. Fletcher and Ovens (2015) speak to this as a way of provoking educators to
think deeply about their practice. They look to work by Brown (2011) that advocates strongly for
the use of self-study. Brown believes that self-study is an important aspect of continuing
professional learning for those working in the field of health, sport, and physical education. “It is
a form of practitioner research in which the development of personal, pedagogical knowledge is
facilitated through a careful examination of one’s own learning beliefs, practices, processes,
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 17
contexts, and relationships (Loughran, 2004; Vanassche & Kelchtermans, 2015)”. (as Cited in
Fletcher & Ovens, 2015, p.215)
LaBosky’s (2015) review of novice teacher self-studies shows that self-study is
definitely a viable option, and that the teachers can “engage in it with fidelity and obtain
meaningful results that are continuing to influence their practice in positive ways”. (p.99)
Moreover, she felt that teachers benefit from the flexibility, responsiveness and evolving
questions that self-study allows.
Attard and Armour (2005) believe that the ongoing reflective process helps a
teacher to rethink and reassess their practice. This, they believe, opens the educator up to new
interpretations and allows the educator to possibly change, adapt, and modify their practice.
Attard and Armour (2005) also discuss how this is a continuum of learning and doesn’t happen in
stages and it is just as important to share reflections within a group in order to gain a wider
perspective on the self. Finally, the linking of practice to theory is better achieved when the
educator participates in a structured and ongoing reflection of their actions.
The exploration of self-studies by Hamilton and Pinnegar in 2015 reveal that
interest, surprise, and curiosity can be key ingredients in orienting self-study researchers in their
work. They also show that engaging in dialogue about self-study research can orient, deepen, and
sharpen questions.
As many of the researchers have pointed out, self-study cannot happen in
isolation. While the reflection and journaling will bring out the thoughts and ideas, the practice
of self-study needs to have an interactivity to it. “(G)uidelines for quality in self-study research,
as expressed by Bullough and Pinnegar (2001), Feldman (2003), Hamilton and Pinnegar (2013),
LaBoskey (2004), Pinnegar and Hamilton (2009), Samaras (2010), and Vanassche and
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 18
Kelchtermans (2015), include interactivity as one of several core features” (as cited in Fletcher,
Ni Chroinin & O’Sullivan, 2016, p.303)
Critical Friends
While several options about sources of interactivity exist, many Self Study
researchers rely on critical friends as their main source of interaction. Fletcher et.al. (2016) refer
to Costa and Kallick (1993) to define a critical friend as a “trusted person who asks provocative
questions, provides data to be examined through another lens, and offers critique of a person’s
work as a friend” (p. 303) Fletcher goes beyond this, adding a second “layer” to the critical
friend concept. During his work on “A Layered Approach to Critical Friendship as a Means to
Support Pedagogical Innovation in Pre-service Teacher Education” from 2016, Fletcher used the
reciprocal critical friend approach with Déirdre Ni Chroinin while research partner Mary
O’Sullivan acted as a second “outside” layer to the process by providing supportive and
challenging feedback to both researchers. (p.304)
Keejoon Yoon and Kathleen Armour’s (2017) research on the benefits of using a
Community of Practice (CoP) as a means of Physical Educator Continuing Professional
Development (PE-CPD) concludes that teachers’ professional learning in the CoP impacted on
the development of both teachers’ pedagogies and intended teaching behaviours which then
influenced pupils’ learning.
Their research into PE-CPD finds that the traditional models were not effective at
bringing about change and innovation to an educator’s practice. They site a number of reasons
such as: “limited focus (Armour and Yelling 2004a), a divergence between what teachers value
and the contents of PE-CPD (Makopoulou and Armour 2011), feelings of isolation (O’Sullivan
and Deglau 2006), lack of directionality (Choi 2004), failure to take into account the context of
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 19
the work place (Ko, Wallhead, and Ward 2006), and limited or inappropriate support (Armour
and Yelling 2004b)” (as cited in Yoon & Armour, 2017, p.428).
McEvoy, Heikinaro-Johansson, and MacPhail (2015) discuss values and purpose
in teacher education and cite Hanson (2008, p.23) from The Values and Purpose of Teacher
Education arguing that without discussing the purpose of their teaching practice people can
become stagnant in their teaching. By reflecting and sharing teachers are able to remain vibrant
and dynamic in their practice and this dialogue is indispensable to their very purpose.
Value Orientation
Research suggests that an experienced teacher’s values reflect several orientations
that form a complex profile which influences the selection of content, teaching styles, and
assessment methods. This research has identified five fundamental value orientations: discipline
mastery (DM), learning process (LP), self-actualization (SA), self/social responsibility (SR), and
ecological integration (EI). Each value orientation serves as a philosophical foundation or a
belief system guiding the physical educator’s curricular choices, instructional decisions, and
teaching behaviors in the gymnasium. (Chen, Zhang, Wells, Schweighardt, and Ennis, 2017).
These five orientations (Table 1) do not exist separate from each other, Chen et.al. (2017) refer to
research by Chen and Ennis from 2015 that suggests an experienced teacher’s belief systems
reflect a combination of orientations that form a profile of that teacher’s values. This
combination represents a hierarchy of priority orientations that are influential in the selection of
content, teaching style, assessment methods, and classroom environment.
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 20
Table 1: A brief description of the five value orientations
Orientation Description
Discipline Mastery (DM) a teacher who emphasizes knowledge and skills.
Learning Process (LP) a teacher who emphasizes the development of process skills for
independent learning regardless of content.
Self-Actualization (SA) a teacher who emphasizes the continual development of an
individual’s autonomy
Social Responsibility (SR) a teacher who encourages pupils to respect and cooperate with
others
Ecological Integration (EI) a teacher who promotes personal meaning for students via
collaboratively developed curricular experiences to achieve
personal and social goals
(Chen et.al., 2017)
Effective or Quality Teaching?
The term effective teaching is associated with the research movement that seeks
links between what teachers do in their classroom or gymnasium, and what students learn.
Meanwhile, Dyson (2014) shares examples of the use of quality teaching; Darling-Hammond
(1997) in general education, The Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) in the
“Shape of the Nation” report (National Association of Sport and Physical Education (NASPE),
2012), and more recently, the policy statement for physical education from the United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2014), who also used the term quality
physical education. So which term will best reflect what I am trying to achieve?
The goal of physical education is student achievement and learning. Many content
forms may be used appropriately to address this singular goal. It is important, however, not to be
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 21
distracted by the diverse assortment of content that effective teachers use to enhance student
learning of fitness, skills, games, adventure, dance, gymnastics, and other movement forms.
These are the means to reaching the end goal of student learning. However, getting to this end
goal of student learning can be difficult and easily disrupted by many contextual and behavioural
factors. (Ennis, 2014) As a result, effective teaching and the resulting student learning can be
easily sidetracked or even derailed.
Curricular decisions about content and the approach or model used to encourage
student achievement and learning can also play a critical role in effectiveness. Kretchmar (2006)
criticizes the mini-unit design that is so prevalent in gymnasiums. Calling it teaching on “Easy
Street” he characterizes the teacher’s role as one of introducing, informing, and entertaining. He
explained that on Easy Street, the physical education focus is on introducing students to a series
of mini-units to expose them to many different physical activities with little hope or expectation
that they will learn the skills, tactics, concepts, or principles leading to sustained or intrinsic
interest or comprehension. Another common approach attached to the mini-unit format that is
often seen in the gymnasium is “keeping them busy with activity” or entertaining students who
might otherwise become behavior problems by enticing them to participate in “busy, happy,
good” environments. This approach, does little to encourage student or teacher accountability for
student learning. (Ennis, 2014)
The opinion of students and their support may play an additional, critical role in
some physical educators’ willingness or ability to teach effectively or implement changes in their
curriculum and teaching. While student enjoyment and public health benefits are highly valued,
when standards-based content is selected and implemented effectively, enjoyment and health are
necessary but insufficient outcomes of learning-based physical education programs. To the many
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 22
people who look to hold educators accountable, student learning is the gold standard in
outcomes-based school curricula (Ennis, 2014) and is seen to clearly indicate the effectiveness of
the teacher.
Yet quality teaching is a term that has the potential to move our attention beyond a
focus merely on issues of effectiveness relating to the achievement of pre-specified objectives.
(Dyson, 2014) Teacher quality is a broad concept that embraces both the concepts of teaching
quality and teacher characteristics. ‘Teaching quality’ is linked directly to a teacher’s pedagogies
in and out of the classroom, such as planning and classroom management. This concept is closely
related to aspects of teaching ‘technique’. (Yoon & Armour, 2017)
As physical educators, we argue that physical activity is important, but it is just
one of many valued outcomes (DEECD, 2015a, 2015b). Mindless physical activity in schools
seems to be more prevalent when PE is taught by generalist teachers, and Ennis (2014) suggests
that in schools where physical activity is the focus, physical education teachers are discouraged
from teaching fundamental motor skills. Without motor skill development included with the
physical activity, the redundant exercises, and simple, frantic, but vigorous games lead to a
mindless approach that does not encourage student learning or achievement.
Meaningful Physical Education
Referred to earlier in the background information, the work of Dr. Tim Fletcher
has guided my foray into Meaningful Physical Education through his work with the Learning
About Meaningful Physical Education (LAMPE) project. This research by Fletcher and his
colleagues is based on the work of by R. Scott Kretchmar. Using the work of Kretchmar (2000,
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 23
2006 , 2008 ) as a basis of the LAMPE philosophy, Fletcher and colleagues suggest that
personally meaningful experiences typically involve:
Fun
Social interaction
Challenge
Motor competence
Delight
Personal relevance
“What separates the LAMPE innovation from general good practice is that the
fostering of meaningful experiences was positioned as the prioritized filter for the pedagogical
decisions we made” (Fletcher, Ni Chroinin, & O’Sullivan, 2016, p.305) This prioritization of
meaningful experiences, with the explicit planning for it makes the approach of Fletcher and
colleagues somewhat unique. Their development of this pedagogical approach stems partly from
the “multi-activity/mini-unit” approach often found in PE and discussed earlier in Effective or
Quality Teaching. They believe that many students lack a personal connection to this dominant
form of PE as it has minimal or no relevance to their lives. They refer to research by Bulger and
Houser from 2009 and Kretchmar from 2008 that criticises the multi-activity/mini-unit design for
not having a long-lasting effect for students partly because physical educators take on too many
objectives in a short period of time and the constant turnover of objectives often results in
learners receiving mixed messages about the place of physical activity in their lives. Their belief
is that “focusing on personally meaningful experiences in physical education carries the potential
to facilitate a stronger commitment to lifelong physical activity participation” (Fletcher et.al.,
2016, p.304)
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 24
In researching meaningful physical education, a number of other researchers
provided support for the direction the LAMPE team is moving in. Dinsmore & Bailey (2011)
point out that “fun and enjoyment were found to be central to these attitudes, closely associated
with a range of factors contributing to the physical education experience”. (p.512) While Wright
(2004) states that “defining educational values has always been problematic: however, there is
increasingly a consensus that in a very fundamental sense they are concerned with the
development of the human potential of each individual. This is often expressed in terms of self-
fulfillment” (p.152) This support for the idea of creating meaningful experiences for the students
as an explicit part of the planning process does pose challenges for teachers. “Creating physical
activity experiences that children and young people ascribe as meaningful requires a pedagogical
approach grounded in listening and responding to children’s perspectives. Young people are
consistent in telling us what they value through physical activity experiences: participating with
their friends, being challenged, having fun, and learning.” (LAMPE, 2016) This makes it critical
for educators to understand the motivations of the students, Kretchmar believes that through
experiencing joy in their learning students are better capable of achieving success.
When movement is experienced as joy, it adorns our lives, makes our days go
better, and gives us something to look forward to. It provides a refreshing interlude. It
prevents the world from turning an unbecoming shade of gray and keeps us from
becoming tired and disinterested. When movement is joyful and meaningful, it
may even inspire us to do things we never thought possible. (Kretchmar, 2008, p.162)
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 25
Section 3: Inquiry Plan
Self-Study Design
I will be using a self-study design to take an in-depth look at my practice.
Encouraged by the work of Dr. Tim Fletcher in the areas of self-study and meaningful physical
education experiences, I hope to be able to look deeply into my practice and determine if I am
giving students meaningful experiences in the gymnasium while also meeting the myriad of
requirements imposed by the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
Fletcher et.al. (2016) use LaBoskey’s criteria for quality self-study research design: (a) self-
initiated and self-focused, (b) improvement-aimed, (c) interactive, (d) using multiple forms of
qualitative data, and (e) demonstrating validity based in trustworthiness. (p. 307) Moreover
Fletcher’s earlier work with his LAMPE colleagues (Ni Chroinin, Fletcher, & O'Sullivan, 2015)
outlined some benefits they see in the self-study approach:
1. That self-study can capture opportunities and challenges and provide self-illumination
while sharing insights on pedagogies of meaning making
2. That self-study forced them to analyze their teaching practices, make judgements and
identify enabling and limiting aspects of their practices.
3. That self-study engaged them in questioning of their pedagogy.
4. That self-study provided the tools for a systematic inquiry into the complex nature of
their practice.
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 26
Framework-for-Inquiry.
Hamilton and Pinnegar (2015) using The Framework-for-Inquiry Analytic
Tool (Table 2) to identify issues that researchers might address in their study providing a
series of questions focused on self and practice. This framework aids researchers to
inform themselves and colleagues less familiar with this work about the operational
how’s and why’s of this methodology.
Table 2. Framework-for-inquiry analytic tool
Topic Questions focused on the self…
Purpose What is the purpose of the study?
Definition of
S-STEP
What definition of S-STEP does the author use? Where is the self-
situated in this study?
Definition of
S-STEP
methodology
When the author describes methodology, how is it apparent that the
study is a S-STEP? How does the author describe the methodology?
Rigorous
research practice
What data collection and data analysis tools are used? How are the
aspects of the methodology described? How did the author make
apparent thoughtful research practice? As part of making a study
rigorous comes in the context selected for study, in what way or
ways do the context support the rigor of the study?
Explicit
evidence In what ways does the author connect the data collected with the
assertions made in the study? For example, if they said that they
interviewed people, how is that displayed in the evidence? Does the
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 27
evidence collected allow for the insights the author claims?
Authority of
experience
How does the author situate the authority of her/his own experience
in the study? How do he/she situate themselves in the study so that
the readers will accept their work as trustworthy?
Story of self In what ways is the self-portrayed in the study? Where is the self in
relationship with others? How is the self-evident?
Situate in larger
literature
Within what research literatures does the author situate their work?
How do they bring depth to the understandings of their field of
focus?
(Hamilton & Pinnegar, 2015, p.183)
Quality Indicators for the Teacher Research.
Dana and Yendol-Hoppey (2014) present five indicators of quality teacher
research; (1) Context of Study, (2) Wonderings and Purpose, (3) Teacher-Research Design, (4)
Teacher-Researcher Learning, and (5) Implications for Practice. These five quality indicators will
help to inform my approach to be an effective Teacher Researcher. Table 3 presents a brief
description of the five indicators and how they can inform my teacher research.
Table 3. Quality Indicators for Teacher Research
Indicator Questions to ponder
Context of
Study
Have I considered all aspects of my context? Will others be able to
understand where my thoughts and wonderings emerge from based
on the description of the context?
Wonderings and
Purpose
Have I effectively described my dilemma? Have I connected my
wonderings to related literature? Are my wonderings focused on me
and my personal practice?
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 28
Teacher-
Researcher
Design
Have I considered all possible data sources and the number of data
sources used? Is my timeline flexible? Is it realistic?
Teacher-
Researcher
Learning
How will I illustrate my findings? Am I confident my findings
emerged from the data rather than forcing the data to fit pre-
determined findings? Can I explain data that didn’t fit? Did these
findings resonate with me through my reflections?
Implications for
Practice
Will these results lead to action within my practice? Are they logical
outgrowths of what I learned in my inquiry? Are there further
wonderings that can grow out of my inquiry?
(Dana & Yendol-Hoppey, 2014)
Methods
Timeline.
The timeline for this self-study is rather short. Reflections began in February 2018
as part of the initial development of this research proposal, this will be followed up in April
2018-May 2018 with further reflections, independent observer notes, critical friend discussions,
student interactions, and an analysis of personal values in education using the Ennis VOI will
take place in May 2018.
Data will be reviewed and analyzed through the months of May and June 2018
with the completion of the self-study presented in mid-July 2018.
1. Literature Review: February – March 2018
2. Data Collection: April – June 2018
a. Researcher Generated Documents Reviewed: May 2018
b. Reflections: February – late May 2018
c. Non-Participant Observations: May 2018
d. Critical Friend Discussions and Notes: May 2018
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 29
e. Student Voice Surveys: June 2018
3. Data Analysis: May – June 2018
4. Capping Experience Presentation and Report Writing: July 2018
Data Collection.
In order to maximize the collection of data and provide a varied approach to the
collection of data I will be using five separate strategies. Firstly, the collection and review of
documents will provide context for the self-study as it relates to the required curriculum as well
as the yearly, unit and lesson plans that have been created. The second data set will come from
written journal reflections on the lessons taking place during the study period of late April
through June. Thirdly, I have the opportunity to have a non-participant observer record
interpretations of what she is watching in the gymnasium. The fourth data set will come from
discussions with a critical friend. My critical friend will be another elementary physical educator
who I often speak with and share my practice with. Additionally, I may be able to share this
research with my PEPLC group in May, thereby getting further critical friends involved in the
discussion of my self-study. The fifth and final data collection method will be student voice. In
order to determine whether the program is meaningful to the students, it is a requirement to find
out from the students what they find meaningful; what they find fun; what they find challenging
or delightful; what motor skills they are developing; what types of social interactions are taking
place, and; what aspects of the physical education program may be personally relevant to their
lives.
Table 4. Data Sources and Prompts
Source Prompts
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 30
Documents Lesson topic? Lesson outcomes? What am I explicitly
attempting to do/teach/present in this lesson? In this unit?
What model is being used?
Reflections Do I feel that the students are getting what I want from the
lesson? Is my focus similar to what they are experiencing?
Non-participant
Observer
What do students seem to be doing during lesson? What are
you observing in their behaviours? Are they on task,
developing a skill? Interest in activity? Do they appear to be
having fun, experiencing joy or delight? Are they being
challenged appropriately? What social interactions are being
observed?
Critical Friend
Discussion
What resonated with me from our discussion was… I would
approach this lesson by…I suggest that you…
Documents.
Through the entire process I will collect documents that will inform me on my
curricular decisions regarding content selection, assessment strategies and timing, unit and lesson
design, and other educational priorities. This data will come from review and reflection on my
planning documents (yearly, unit and lesson plans, assessment plans and documents).
Other documents that will inform the data are the NSTU Guidelines: Constitution
and Policy document, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Physical
Education P-3 and 4-6 curriculum documents, the Essential Learning Outcomes P-3 document,
and the Streamlined Curriculum 4-6 document.
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 31
Written Reflections.
“Capturing “thinking” is a challenge for any researcher. One way a teacher
researcher captures the thinking that occurs in the school and classroom and within his or her
own mind is through journaling. Journals provide teachers a tool for reflecting on their own
thought processes” (Dana, 2014, p.109)
Fletcher and Ni Chroinin developed a format for recording their reflections. They
began with brief overviews of the lesson plan but would focus the reflection on a critical incident
from each class that resonated with them and the LAMPE pedagogies. They recorded a
contextual description of the incident and would reflect on whether their feelings about the
critical incident had changed as a result of the reflections. In doing this they were able to
pinpoint and analyze their data with respect to the meaningful experiences and the pedagogical
approaches that enabled or limited the experiences. This type of structured reflection is the
approach I will take as I believe it focuses the mind and data collection thereby making it easier
to analyze at a later time. Additionally, as a novice teacher researcher and as a novice reflective
educator (in a structured and organized sense) this format will also assist in the process of
reflecting. (Fletcher et.al., 2016)
Non-Participant Observer.
The availability of a Non-Participant Observer provides the teacher researcher
with an ability to collect observations of lessons, teaching practice, and student behaviour and
provides a major means of collecting data in qualitative research. It offers a firsthand account of
the situation under study and, when combined with other methods of data collection, provides for
a holistic interpretation of the phenomenon being investigated. (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016).
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 32
Having access to a non-participant observer also allows for the use of digital
pictures and video as data. Nancy Fichtman Dana (2014) describes the use of pictures and video
as allowing teacher researchers to gain a better “understand an unfolding behavior, capture the
process used, study the learning situation, and make visible products or outcomes. More
specifically, through observing video of one’s own teaching, teachers can observe attitudes, skill
and knowledge levels, nature of interactions, nonverbal behavior, instructional clarity, and the
influence of physical surroundings” (p.107-108)
Critical Friend Discussion.
Fletcher et.al. (2016) look to the work of Costa and Kallick (1993) who defined a
critical friend as a “trusted person who asks provocative questions, provides data to be examined
through another lens, and offers critique of a person’s work as a friend” (p.303). They go on to
consider the beliefs of Baskerville & Goldblatt (2009) and Vanassche & Kelchtermans (2015)
who believe that having a critical friendship allows a teacher researcher to challenge their
assumptions and identify new ways of thinking about their practice as a teacher, while also
allowing for alternative interpretations of situations and reflections. One caution from Fletchers
work with Ni Chroinin & O’Sullivan (2016) was that they found themselves to be more “friend”
than “critic” and may have been “overly sensitive to one another’s feelings and emotions, we
risked not receiving enough critical support from one another through moments of frustration or
uncertainty” (p.303) In their discussion they reflected that this may have occurred because
initially parameters were not set for their expectations of each other in the relationship. This
learning will inform my critical friendship in such as I will endeavour to establish clear
expectations with my critical friend prior to beginning our discussions.
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 33
As a part of the critical friend discussion I will use prompts similar to those
Fletcher and Ni Chroinin did. Examples of the prompts they used are:
What resonated with my thinking was…
The questions that it raised for me are…
If I were going to be contentious, I might suggest… (Fletcher et.al., 2016, p.308)
Student Voice.
“Helping children to articulate their opinions about the environment and
stimulating the development of social responsibility is a crucial, but often forgotten, factor in the
prevention of psychosocial problems and promotion of health and well-being for children.”
(MacDougall, Shiller and Darbyshire, 2004 , p.372) Given that this self-study is a reflection of
my teaching practice it seems illogical to not include the voice of those who are directly
influenced by the curricular decisions I am making on a daily basis. Yet, with the age of the
students my main concern is their ability to effectively participate in discussions on their PE
needs. Working with students from 4-12 years of age MacDougall, Shiller and Darbyshire (2004)
found in their study of student opinions regarding physical activity that “children were
enthusiastic participants in the research and appreciated the opportunity to communicate their
views.” (p.369) If my students’ values and opinions are going to help shape their future PE
experiences, I need to listen to these views, conduct research where necessary and consider how
their views can inform and shape my practice. By taking the time to speak with students in
informal ways I hope to gauge their impressions of the PE program and whether it is meeting
their needs. This data collection will take the form of in class notes that will then later be
compiled into a journal format.
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 34
Data Analysis
Data analysis is an ongoing process in a qualitative research study. It should begin
with the completion of the first collection of data, be it an interview, survey, observation… and
doesn’t conclude until you have presented your findings. Even then, through peer review,
submission to journals and defense of the research further data analysis may continue as a result
of the feedback and critiques received. The process is emerging, recursive and dynamic.
Merriam and Tisdell (2016) talk about the interactive nature of data collection,
analysis and reporting, of how one set of data informs and directs the next phase in the data
collection, of how as the researcher your insights, hunches and hypothesis may change or take
the research in a new direction. The continual analysis of collected data allows for the refinement
of the collection process; fine tuning the observational focus or rewording an interview question.
Using a timeline of data collection that will allow for simultaneous data analysis
is important. Too much data can become overwhelming and unmanageable. It will be important
to keep in mind a few of the “helpful suggestions” that Merriam and Tisdell (2016) attribute to
Bogdan and Biklen. The most helpful for my research will be the suggestions that help to keep
me focused on the task at hand, to keep my mind and data from wandering and to keep myself
organized and methodical. For my study, I will be using data analysis to inform my data
collection as described above. By creating a timeline that allows for simultaneous collection and
analysis I allow the data to lead me through the observations. Keeping track of my thoughts,
feelings and commentary will be a critical aspect of my reflections and by using the hints offered
by Merriam and Tisdell (2016) such as margin notes, brackets and a journal I hope to manage
these aspects of the data collection effectively.
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 35
Coding.
As data is collected and analyzed, it is important to begin the process of coding
the data. This involves reading through the field notes, transcripts, or other data and identifying
the key ideas and concepts as they relate to the research problem. As Merriam and Tisdell point
out “a unit of data can be as small as a word a participant uses to describe a feeling or
phenomenon, or as large as several pages of field notes describing a particular incident.”
(Merriam & Tisdell, 2016, p. 201). As the data grows so will the codes that represent all aspects
of everything determined to be relevant to the study. Once a number of codes have been
developed through data then I will review codes looking for larger concepts that can bring
together groups of the codes. For example, for my non-participant observer I might have a set of
codes such as feedback, praise, criticism, and social. All of these codes could then be categorized
under responsive interactions between teacher and student. This process is called axial coding.
Given the research problem and guiding questions have formed my thinking
going into the data collection, the use of a priori coding strategy, where I have predetermined
some of the codes to fit the desired storyline of the research may also be effective (Stuckey HL,
2015). With the focus on meaningful physical education experiences I plan to begin use the
coding described in Table 4, below.
Table 5. A Priori Coding – potential codes and behaviours
Code Behaviours to observe
Fun and/or Delight Happiness, laughing, engagement, joy
Challenge Too easy, too hard, appropriate
Frustration, errors, off task
Interactions Positive, negative
o Student-student, student-teacher, teacher-student
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 36
Behaviour, social, critical,
constructive/corrective
Motor Competence Practicing skill
o Proper performance, uses feedback
Personally Relevant Engagement, interest
An important final reminder from Merriam and Tisdell (2016) is the need to
ensure that categories are responsive to the research problem and reflect what is being studied,
that they be exhaustive and include every piece relevant data, that they be mutually exclusive and
that the names should be sensitive to the data in the category, and finally that they are
conceptually congruent, in that each item of data should exist on the same “level”.
Credibility and Trustworthiness.
Do the research findings match the reality from which they were observed? Is the
researcher capturing the true essence of the observation? Is the researcher measuring what they
believe they are measuring? Credibility or internal validity addresses these questions. It “refers to
the believability and trustworthiness of the findings. This depends more on the richness of the
data gathered than on the quantity of data. The participants of the study are the only ones that
decide if the results actually reflect the phenomena being studied and therefore, it is important
that participants feel the findings are credible and accurate.” (CIRT, n.d.)
Merriam and Tisdell (2006) describe triangulation as a means to “shore up” the
credibility (internal validity) of a study. They refer to the four types of triangulation (as cited in
Denzin, 1978); multiple methods, multiple data sources, multiple theories, and multiple
investigators. Similarly, Cohen and Crabtree (2006) discuss these same ways to triangulate data.
However, believe that “rather than seeing triangulation as a method for validation or verification,
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 37
qualitative researchers generally use this technique to ensure that an account is rich, robust,
comprehensive and well-developed.” (Cohen & Crabtree, 2006, Triangulation Page).
Through the use of a multiple methods triangulation, which is the cross-checking
of data and findings through the various sources of data collection, I will endeavour to provide
credibility and trustworthiness to the research. Personal journaling and reflection, the Ennis
Value Orientation Instrument (VOI), non-participant observations, critical friend discussions,
student interactions, and written documents (curriculum guides, yearly, unit, lesson and
assessment plans and timelines) will all provide a rich and in-depth picture of the research.
Hamilton and Pinnegar (2015) discuss how researchers in a self-study will come
up against unexpected experiences or reflections that challenge their understandings. At these
times they need to reach out to the wider knowledge base and the research related to their self-
study. This allows the researcher to deepen and support their understandings and put themselves
into a larger research conversation thereby giving the opportunity for the researcher to share their
findings and contribute to a broader understanding of the topic. (Hamilton & Pinnegar, 2015)
Meanwhile, Fletcher and Ovens (2015) believe that trustworthiness is established by readers of
their research placing the findings and results into their personal contexts, situations, challenges
and understandings.
Ethical Considerations.
Ethics are the standards and norms that help a person determine right from wrong,
acceptable or unacceptable. The credibility and consistency of research findings rely on the
adherence to ethical principles. Patton (2015) states that “methods do not ensure rigor. A research
design does not ensure rigor. Analytical techniques and procedures do not ensure rigor. Rigor
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 38
resides in, depends on, and is manifest in rigorous thinking— about everything, including
methods and analysis” (as cited in Merriam & Tisdell, 2016, p.260).
Analyzing data may present other ethical problems. Since the researcher is the
primary instrument for data collection, data have been filtered through his or her particular
theoretical position and biases. Deciding what is important— what should or should not be
attended to when collecting and analyzing data— is almost always up to the investigator.
Opportunities thus exist for excluding data contradictory to the investigator's views. Sometimes
these biases are not readily apparent to the researcher. (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016) Through the
use of a non-participant observer as well as critical friend discussions, it is possible to mitigate
these biases and this limitation to the self-study.
Ethics in Practice.
The personal ethics of the researcher may at times come to the forefront in qualitative
research. Dilemmas may emerge during data collection, data analysis or when sharing the
findings that force the researcher to make an ethical decision. Knowing what to do can be a
challenge and the researcher must trust their own personal values, morals, and beliefs and make a
decision. (Merriam and Tisdell, 2016) The “Ethical Issues Checklist” developed by Patton in
2015 lists 12 items to be considered.
Explaining the purpose of the inquiry and methods to be used
Reciprocity (what's in it for those involved)
Promises
Risk assessment
Confidentiality
Informed consent
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 39
Data access and ownership
Interviewer mental health
Ethical advice (who will be your counselor on ethical matters)
Data collection boundaries
Ethical and methodological choices
Ethical versus legal (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016, p.264)
As a novice researcher, this list is a perfect starting off point to ensure that, aside
from any procedural ethics involved in the research (of which I do not believe there to be any), I
don’t make any ethical miss-steps. In the end ethics is simply making sure that, as a researcher,
you have crossed your “t’s” and dotted your “i’s”, that you have considered the moral and ethical
implications of what you are doing, observing, asking, and determined them to be acceptable,
that you are doing no harm whether physical, social, emotional or mental to anyone involved or
affected by the research and that you are not putting yourself or others in any illegal situations.
Section 4: Findings
From the beginning of this research it was important for the pedagogical concepts to be
familiar to the students. The concepts that make up meaningfulness and meaningful experiences,
as described by LAMPE in their research, were introduced and discussed with students in class
prior to the beginning of data collection. Additionally, as an introduction to the survey of student
perceptions of meaningfulness in the spring PE program, I recorded a short video that again
discussed meaningfulness with respect to challenge, delight, fun, personal relevance, social
interaction and skill development. The major finding of this research was that, overall, students
appear to find their physical education experiences meaningful in some way, the majority of the
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 40
time. This result reinforces my beliefs that the program is meeting the needs of the bulk of the
students. The question that grew out of these findings though is “can we make PE meaningful to
every student in every lesson?”.
Reflections on my Practice
Value orientation.
I went through this instrument as part of the reflective process with regard to my
teaching practice. By looking into my value orientation, I hope to find out where my beliefs "fit"
according to the research by Chen, Zhang, Wells, Schweighardt, and Ennis (2017). When I first
came across this research in 2017 I reflected on where I felt I would fit into it. Below is an
excerpt from a paper I wrote that addressed this topic.
Based on descriptions of the Ennis Value Orientation Inventory used in the
research by Chen, Zhang, Wells, Schweighardt, and Ennis (2017) I believe
that I would primarily fall into an orientation combination of the ecological
integration (EI) and self/social responsibility (SR) orientations with a more EI
focus. The EI orientation is a balanced perspective that addresses mastery, self-
actualization and social interaction. Subject matter and social responsibility hold
equal importance in developing an engaged and confident mover. While my
secondary orientation would seem to fit the SR orientation that focuses on
interpersonal interactions, cooperation, and teamwork in both the learning
situation and beyond. The SR orientation uses group-centered instruction,
expects students to demonstrate respect and cooperation, value teamwork
and emphasize collective effort. There are also aspects of disciplinary
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 41
mastery (DM), specifically the development of physical competence, and
learning process (LP) through the use of problem- solving and application of
learning. (Van Ritchie, 2017, p.5)
Having taken these types of inventories many times over the years, I felt it best to
embark on this in two distinct ways. Firstly, I took the test twice (April 27th, 2018 and June 6th,
2018) as a means of validating the results. Secondly, I never opened the scoring guide until I was
finally ready to score the tests (June 6th, 2018). The results were unexpected in some ways,
though upon reflection quite accurate. My earlier reflection above is one that is possibly a little
unrealistic and altruistic. I know how to talk the talk, so to speak, and that reflection may just be
that.
The results of the VOI taken this spring clearly placed me in a very different set
of orientations, quite the opposite of my July 2017 reflection.
Table 6: Value Orientation Instrument - Results
DM LP SA EI SR0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Apil 27th June 6th
Looking at these results I consistently show a preference for the students to
develop individual autonomy (SA) with a strong focus on the learning process (LP) and
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 42
discipline mastery (DM). Putting these together would look like a program that encourages
students to learn independently, to share their voice about their program and to take more control
of their learning, while focusing on their development of the knowledge and skills of the PE
program. Interestingly, to me, this seems to be exactly what I am looking to move toward with
this change plan that will explicitly focus on meaningful experiences for the students.
Non-participant observations.
The results obtained from 25 observations done over the spring by a non-participant
observer who was assisting in the PE program as a coop student provide more evidence of that
the program appears to be meaningful to the students. The 25 observations were done on 25
different students, randomly selected using a number generator which corresponded to their class
number (alphabetical listing). The students ranged from primary to grade 5, with 52% being male
and 48% being female. Students of visible minorities made up 16% of the data (12% African NS,
4% Arabic) with the remaining 84% being Caucasian.
Figure 2: Non-participant observer – student grade, gender and ethnicity breakdown
Results of the observations clearly show the students were engaged and enjoying
the activities, appeared to be appropriately challenged, and were interacting with each other in
positive ways. These results all point to meaningfulness being created in the program. (Figure 3).
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 43
Figure 3: Meaningful Experiences Observed by Non-Participant
Student voice: Are current approaches meaningful to “the students”?
What do the students find meaning in? This question is critical to answer in order
to determine if there exists congruence or divergence between myself and my students. Using a
Google Form that was voluntary and available to all grade 4 and 5 students through my Google
Classroom, I asked them to check all that apply to them on a regular basis, with regard to their
general PE program. The results are listed in Table 8 below. The survey also asked about favorite
activity/game, fondest memory and things they disliked. Themes that emerged from these written
responses included: (1) Team sports were listed as favorite activity and fondest memory most
often, (2) gymnastics was the most popular individual activity listed, and (3) the most common
answer to least favorite activity was “none”. These results did not surprised me for a couple
reasons, firstly, the team sports (4 corner soccer, 4 corner tag tchoukball, rounders) we played
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 44
were cooperative based and non-competitive in design. They focused on teamwork and every
game was preceded by an activity focused on fun, skill development and social interactions. The
popularity of gymnastics was also no surprise as the spring gymnastics program is a culmination
of their gymnastics “unit” which spans the year and had 4 sessions of varying lengths. The final
session this spring was very student focused giving them the autonomy to choose the skills,
apparatus and partners they wished to focus on. Comparing this with the results from the “How
Meaningful were our Spring PE Activities” survey reinforces these beliefs of the students with
team sports and gymnastics the highest ranked activities for “Fun” (Table 9), “Delight” (Table
13), and Personal Relevance (Table 14).
Table 8: Student voice in PE survey results
PE is Fun
A Goo
d Cha
lleng
e
Too Easy
Too H
ard
Positiv
e Soc
ial In
teract
ions
Enjoy S
kill D
evelo
pmen
t
I am im
provin
g
Releva
nt to
me
Life lo
ng m
emori
es0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Grade 4 Grade 5
Fun
The student survey revealed results that were not unexpected. While reflecting on
the effectiveness of lessons and on whether I believed I was presenting meaningful experiences
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 45
to the students, my thoughts consistently mirrored the results of the survey. Gymnastics is
undoubtedly the favourite activity of the majority of my students, the novelty of Tchoukball (a
new game introduced this spring), the connection to the Winter Olympics with the simple play
like concepts of Bobsled/Luge/Skeleton, and the simple and friendly competition in Rounders (a
version of soccer baseball) account for the high scores for fun. Conversely, the practice time that
was spent and the difficulty in being successful in Spikeball could account for its lower fun
scoring.
Table 9: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey - FUN
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of the amount of fun they had during the
activities this spring.
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Tchoukball Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Vault
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Intro to Golf
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Bars
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 46
Social interactions.
Reviewing the social interaction results from the student survey confirm what was
observed by the non-participant observer. The vast majority of the time interactions are of a
positive nature. The only activities that brought up “generally not positive or cooperative, poor
sportsmanship seen” were the games where teams played against each other. However, even in
those activities the majority of the responses were “occasionally” or “always” “positive or
cooperative”. Instances of poor sportsmanship and poor cooperation became most apparent with
the older grades during the activities that provided opportunity to compete and keep score. These
situations also led to instances of students “cheating” and “not following the rules” in order to
gain advantages in the games. While these were not observed in significant amount by the non-
participant observer, and were also not significant in the survey results, there were numerous
references in my journals concerning these types of behaviours and planning to address and
mitigate them.
Table 10: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – SOCIAL INTERACTIONS
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf
Tchoukball Gymnastics Floor
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 47
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of their social interactions with peers in the
groupings and activities this spring.
Challenge.
Challenge is an interesting concept to discuss and get feedback on from
elementary students. The survey results listed in Table 7 seem to imply that the majority of the
activity done this past spring was relatively easy for the majority of the students who responded
to the survey. As the survey was conducted anonymously it is difficult to say whether or not
these perceptions of the students reflect my own perceptions. However, in my reflections on
three of the activities I was critical of my planning due to the difficulty that almost every student
had grasping the game play concepts of 4 Corner Tag Tchoukball, the poorly developed striking
skills and cooperation required for Spikeball and the poor striking skills required for golf.
Similarly, the four gymnastics activities were overwhelmingly rated as very easy to easy, yet the
skill level of students with only minor exceptions is at the beginner levels of development and in
my mind should be reflected as a good challenge for almost every student in the school.
Created with the concept of challenge in mind, 4 Corner Tag Tchoukball proved to
be a great experiment during this research. The game was created as a modified form of
Tchoukball (using the rebounders and scoring system) that allowed running with the ball until
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 48
tagged, at which point the player would have to attack a rebounder or pass to their teammate.
Eight players moved about the gym as attackers (2 per team) while the remaining team members
remained in their corner as defenders at the rebounder. The game was introduced in steps (similar
to a Teaching Games for Understanding build) to help understanding of the Tchoukball scoring
concepts, the moving/tagging concept, and the attacking/defending roles. It was interesting to see
the survey results indicate 44% found it easy or very easy, while 39% found it to be a good
challenge or too hard. Given the frustrations I and many students experienced during the first
couple days of this activity and the limited overall success of students I was anticipating a much
higher response for it being too hard.
Table 11: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – CHALLENGE
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf
Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 49
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of how easy to hard the students found it to
be successful in the activities this spring.
Skill development.
As a teacher focused on the educational aspects of a PE program, I often have skill
development as a critical focus in lessons, though rarely does it encompass a majority of time.
Kicking skills this spring was a focus and while we played Rounders (a kicking game) and 4
corner soccer (a kicking game) I decided to spend a couple lessons entirely focused on
developing the kicking skills. With these lessons I tried to keep the concept of fun and delight
alive by have energetic and popular warmup games, then would focus in on the skill
development of kicking, drop kicks and ball control with the feet. Reflecting on these lessons I
was encouraged by a couple things, firstly, the commitment of students to stay on task and
practice the skills, and secondly, the persistence of the younger students who would ask to have a
ball to practice kicking in future lessons.
Survey results of skill development consistently show a majority of students indicate that
they perceived their effort to be high and their skills to have improved. I find it interesting that all
four gymnastics activities have very high responses of “I am much better now”. It is also positive
to note that in only a few cases did students indicate that they “did not work to improve my
skills”. This helps to confirm the non-participant observations that activities were appropriately
planned so that students were able to be successful practicing their skills and could improve their
performance.
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 50
Table 12: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of how easy to hard the students found it to
be successful in the activities this spring.
Delight.
The concept of delight was a tough one to have students fully comprehend during our
discussions at the outset of this research. After a couple of attempts and reflections on the
wording I was using I came up with the idea of “a memory to last a lifetime” as representing the
ultimate in a delightful experience. From there student understanding seemed to increase and
they were able to share examples during discussions about favorite activities and fondest
memories. In reviewing reflections, the most common theme to emerge from fondest memories
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 51
was tag games, specifically ones that had some meaning to the students. Grinch Tag, Pokemon
Tag and Raptor Tag were consistently mentioned as favorites by the younger and older students
alike. In each case the game has a story to it and is more involved than a simple freeze tag style
game.
Early on in this process I planned an activity specifically focused on delight as the
goal. Shortly after the Winter Olympics had ended I introduced the students to the sled sports
with a highlight reel of bobsled, luge and skeleton along with some basics about each sport. We
then created our own sleds using scooter boards and gymnastics mats and tried out bobsled style
racing, luge style racing and skeleton style racing on our “sleds”. This lesson was easily the most
energetic, engaged and exuberant activity of the season. In fact, the one-off lesson turned into
two or even three lessons for some classes as they simply had to keep playing it!
Table 13: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – DELIGHT
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf
Tchoukball Gymnastics Floor
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 52
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of memorable and delightful the activities
were this spring.
Personal relevance.
Personal relevance was another concept that took a little effort to get
understanding from the students. While I do include lesson goals, “I can” statements and “talking
circle time” in most lessons the idea of PE being educational still eludes many of the students.
Often the question “when are we going to start?” comes up from the younger students 5 minutes
into a mini-lesson on a skill or concept. Consequently, I related personal relevance simply to
importance rather than the why we are learning and how it applies to life outside the gym.
Planning for personal relevance was rather difficult, as every student has differing
ideas of what might be relevant to their lives. However, on reflection it became apparent that the
tag games most enjoyed by the students seemed to result from personal relevance rather than
challenge, fun, delight, social interaction, or skill development. By creating a narrative and
building the game through a story these four tag games became the most popular at my school.
An example is Pokémon Tag, it is a story-based tag game that involves characters from the
Pokémon world, along with training, battling and pretending to be a Pokémon. This game grew
out of the constant talk of Pokémon and the playing of the card game at school and when first
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 53
introduced was an instant hit with the students. This and the other tag games are used as
warmups and are played often, generally by request of a student or group of students.
Table 14: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – PERSONAL RELEVANCE
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of how important or relevant the activities
were this spring.
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf
Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 54
Section 4: Discussion
The understanding of my approach that can be derived from this research on
meaningfulness for the students is critical in creating and program that can meet the needs of the
students. As Ennis (2017) points out, “Effective teachers plan carefully, create an engaging
environment, provide clear instruction, and support students with learning cues and formative
assessments.” (p.241) Therefore, in order to be an effective or quality educator using this data to
inform my curricular choices is critical. Ennis goes on to discuss the three types of PE programs
happening in the gymnasiums of America today; the recreational approach, the public health
approach and the educational approach. By working with the findings in this research and using
the current structures in my program I will be continuing on the path to offering a high quality,
meaningful physical education program using an educational approach. By valuing and explicitly
planning for the concepts of meaningful physical education, while continuing to pursue the
educational approaches and content that work to develop the students understanding and ability
to apply learning in multiple contexts and situations. With this lofty goal, I am left with some
emerging questions, (1) Can I create meaningfulness in every lesson, for every student? (2) How
will I explicitly plan for meaningfulness in the future? And (3) What can I do to ensure the
quality of the educational program given the constraints of limited instructional time and a
multitude of outcomes to cover.
Creating Meaningfulness in Every Lesson, for Every Student?
Throughout the spring while this research was taking place my thoughts
constantly revolved around this question. How can every lesson be meaningful for every student?
Is this even possible? How would I plan for all of these concepts to be approached and covered?
Then while reading an educational blog I came across the idea of a sound board. The educator
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 55
was using the concept of the sliding buttons of the sound board to each represent an aspect of his
program. That made sense to me and I began thinking of the six concepts of meaningfulness as
each being one of a group that needed to be arranged differently every lesson and for every
student. So, moving on with this approach, by planning a lesson based on my knowledge of the
students, my knowledge of the curriculum and outcomes, and my understanding of meaningful
experiences and quality teaching I will allow for every concept to have its own degree or level of
priority. Fun may be high, while challenge is low… or a focus on skill development means it is
high as would be challenge while fun and social interactions are lower. This idea answered the
first part of my questioning about creating meaning in every lesson, but what about the second
part, creating meaning for every student?
It was not until discussions with a critical friend (an elementary PE specialist in
the HRCE and PEPLC member) that I realized it may not be that difficult of a problem to solve.
His point was that given the six concepts that create meaningful experiences, a well-planned and
prepared lesson ought to be able to hit one of the six for every child. He was also of the mindset
that creating meaning was not an all or nothing event and when it occurred in a lesson it wasn’t
for the entire lesson but happened in short bursts or episodes. These feelings about creating
meaningfulness in every lesson for every student opened my eyes to the possibilities. If
meaningfulness could be episodic, then planning for it to happen was not necessarily required. A
“teachable moment” is a common term in education for when you can stop everything and
refocus on what just happened to “teach something else”. His point about meaningful
experiences being like a “teachable moment” was critical in my understandings moving forward
in the research and with planning for meaningful PE in the future.
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 56
Explicitly Planning for Meaningfulness
A variety of strategies on how to plan for meaningfulness have presented themselves
along this journey. One of the more challenging concepts to plan for has been personally relevant
learning. In Walseth et. al. (2018) they discussed the use of goals for every lesson that are
explicitly clarified to the students at the beginning of every lesson and how their students found
this to be motivating and made the activities more meaningful to them. They also discussed the
importance of including the students in the planning process, especially those students that
dislike PE. Walseth and colleagues stated that they found these students to be more engaged and
interested in PE when they had a say in the program creation.
Planning for fun, on the other hand should be no trouble at all. As Garn and
Cothran (2006) point out fun is a primary goal of both teachers and students. With the knowledge
of our students we can then design engaging activities and lessons that will promote student
enjoyment while also addressing curricular outcomes. They do go on to indicate that when
teachers are planning for fun, they must also account for the social interactions that will be
taking place, whether they are student-student or teacher-student.
Utilising reflection during lessons is an especially important strategy for including
the concepts of challenge and personally relevant learning. Although they can be planned,
specific modifications to activities and games that ensure appropriate levels of challenge can be
difficult to predict for each student. For this reason, modifications in the moment can be more
useful because they were based on direct observations of students’ engagement and experience.
As for personally relevant learning, during talking circle times it is possible to find ways to help
students make connections to their lives outside the classroom. For example, this spring the
hottest new thing was Fortnite, an online first-person shooter game. Needless to say, not
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 57
elementary school appropriate, but nonetheless discussed constantly. An aspect of the game that
kept rearing its ugly head was the taunting that avatars do after a kill – they dance over their
victim. Well there are a few different dances and more than a few times I had to stop classes to
discuss why I was not allowing these dances to be done in the gym. We would discuss why the
characters danced in the game and what it meant. Then we would reflect on what that would be
like in real life. These discussions fortuitously evolved at the same time I was focusing my life
skills sessions on what “A Good Sport in PE understands”.
Providing choice in activities is a key method of encouraging the engagement of
students in activities that they find meaningful to them. There are a variety of ways to provide
choice during a lesson, each allowing a focus on a different aspect of meaningfulness. This can
be as simple as allowing students to select from a variety of equipment options (bean bag, tennis
ball, foam ball or juggling ring to practice juggling) allowing choice regarding skill
development, to choosing partners or groupings which addresses social interactions, to having
choice in the level of challenge in an activity (foul shots vs three point shots), or even between
different activities (personal relevance). However, to be meaningful and truly effective creating
autonomy in PE needs to include the students in said creation. Using an activist approach to co-
create curriculum that fits the needs and interests of every student by focusing on what can be
changed in order to improve engagement. Walseth, Engebretsen, & Elvebakk (2018) detail how
to use the activist approach. The work in this research has provided a vision into the minds of the
students and has given me a foundation to build upon. I now know the students better, their
opinions, their like and dislikes in PE, their fondest memories in PE. This represents the first
phase of an activist approach. Next is the development of a thematic program or unit, teaching
principles and a teaching plan. A thematic unit focuses on learning around a central theme and
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 58
may use a variety of sports and physical activities to reach this goal. Including the student
opinions and input in this process is crucial. Therefore, involving the students in the program
planning process is of great importance to their experiences of meaningfulness in PE. Walseth et
al. (2018) show that to listen to students and broaden students’ understanding of what PE can be
has the potential to empower students, and to contribute to meaningful experiences in PE.
What I want to be able to create and accomplish after this research into my
teaching practice can be summed up nicely by the words of Prithwi Raj Subramaniam (2010),
A learning environment that provides high cognitive engagement, meaningful
content, instant enjoyment, exploration opportunities, novelty and challenge, and
active-learning experiences—and that is vested in a mastery climate employing
developmentally appropriate activities and using a variety of instructional
approaches that empower students. (p. 41)
Section 5: Final Reflection
Throughout the last two years I have been exposed to many new ideas about
education that have transformed how I think about physical education. The reading and research
I have done has opened my eyes to the vast variety of approaches and models for teaching PE.
The process of planning, preparing, teaching and reflecting on my practice has become a more
thoughtful activity for me. How I interact with my students; knowing their needs, likes, dislikes
and values with regard to PE, developing more depth, consideration, and understanding of them
as people. What I value in terms of curriculum, leadership, and change in the realm of education,
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 59
in my school and in my gymnasium has grown to be more inclusive, relevant, and appropriate.
Ultimately what all of this learning and research has led to is a new understanding of what I need
to move forward in my teaching, to be the best physical educator possible.
Interestingly it has been the final courses that have really brought clarity to my
reflections concerning my teaching. Leadership, change and meaningful experiences in PE
represent much of the content I have reflected on, read and absorbed and focused on over the
past few months. What I have finally realized is that creating change in any culture is a
challenging and long-term process and within my teaching practice, the culture I need to lead in
change is that of the classroom environment. In order to effectively address the problem, I
needed to gather information and create a new vision for my classroom. With that in mind I
proceeded to address the question of meaningfulness of the physical education program. Through
a variety of data collection methods (non-participant observer, student voice, and reflection) I
endeavoured to understand what the students were thinking about their experiences in the gym.
Would I find a correlation between their interpretation of the program and the increase in
misbehaviours? Would their feelings about the PE program reflect my feelings about it?
At the same time, it is important for me to understand where I am coming from as
an educator and leader of change. What leadership styles do I use? Which would be best suited
for this change plan? What skills do I have or need to develop? Additionally, I believe that
reflecting on what I value as a physical educator is also very important to understanding what I
have to do to create a change in the culture in the gymnasium.
“Moral purpose means acting with the intention of making a positive difference in
the lives of individuals” This quote from the 7th slide of the Chapter 1/2 presentation by
Professor Berg in EDUC 533 – Dynamics of Change, speaks volumes to me. My intention is
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 60
now to create and embrace meaningful experiences for the students in PE that help to alleviate
the off-task behaviours. As a leader moral purpose needs to guide my decision making and I
believe that my goal to make PE more meaningful for the students through the planning process
fits. I have the trust of the students and am working to build on that through giving them voice in
their programs, I have a fine-tuned focus I am working toward and will develop it with the
students and other teachers. I must persevere through this change until it becomes my go to
practice in teaching and thereby is second nature. My plan for teaching explicitly for meaningful
experiences in physical education is slowly developing the coherence needed to take hold. The
critical difference with this change in my practice, is my moral purpose. By discovering
Meaningful PE as a "thing", I found research that spoke to my feelings, values and beliefs about
PE and gave language and direction to much of what I have been doing over the years.
Coherence is all about mindsets, creating a shared mindset among all the
stakeholders involved. It is critical that only a small number of goals are established, with the
focus on student achievement in PE. My strategy to building coherence will focus on creating an
excitement over student ownership of the PE program by making it meaningful to as many
students as possible as often as possible. I have begun the process and have a focused direction in
which I am moving my practice. I have also started to create the collaborative culture with the
students through investigating their likes, dislikes and opinions about the PE program. The next
steps are deepening the learning through creating goals and shifting my practice to meet the
goals. Ultimately through building coherence my hope is to create a sustained focus on improved
practice, more consistency in behaviours and improved student performance in PE.
Another focus with respect to change is to address the marginalization of physical
education as a program in school. This begins with simple steps like getting people to use proper
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 61
terminology. "Gym class" and "Gym" need to become Physical Education, PE, or Phys. Ed.
Secondly, more work with the other staff to view PE not as prep time but rather as an integral
aspect of the curriculum is needed.
Throughout this journey I have worked at reflecting in, on and about action (or as
I described it using level 1,2 and 3 reflections). I continue to take risks with my teaching,
searching for the most meaningful and instructive ways to bring the information and skills alive
for my students. Working with others in the PE community and my school is a critical aspect of
driving the changes in culture I am hoping to achieve. Finally, my professional development has
impacted my teaching and student achievement continually over the past couple years in this
MED program. The connection between the quality of my teaching and the quality of the student
experiences has definitely strengthened.
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1226
1227
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 62
References
American Educational Research Association. (2018). Research Connections: Getting Started
with Self-Study. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/SIG109/Research-Connections
Arnold, Julie, Edwards, Tony, Hooley, Neil & Williams, J. (2012). Conceptualising teacher
education and research as ‘critical praxis’. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 281-295,
doi: 10.1080/17508487.2012.703140
Attard, Karl & Armour, Kathleen M. (2005). Learning to become a learning professional:
reflections on one year of teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 195-
207. doi: 10.1080/02619760500093321
Bailey, Richard. (2018). Sport, physical education and educational worth. Educational Review,
70 (1), 51-66. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1403208
Beni, S., Fletcher, T, & Ni Chroinin, D. (2018). Using features of meaningful experiences to
guide primary physical education practice. European Physical Education Review. 17.
doi:10.1177/1356336X18755050
Beni S, Fletcher T & Ni Chroinin D. (2017). Meaningful experiences in physical education and
youth sport: A review of the literature. Quest 69, (3), 291–312.
doi:10.1080/00336297.2016.1224192
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 63
Chen, Zhang, Wells, Schweighardt, and Ennis (2017). Impact of teacher value orientations on
student learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education.
36(2), 152-161. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0027
Center for Innovation and Research in Teaching (CIRT) at Grand Canyon University. (n.d.).
Establishing Validity in Qualitative Research. Retrieved from
https://cirt.gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/qualitative/validity
Cohen D., and Crabtree B. (2006). Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. Retrieved from
http://www.qualres.org/HomeTria-3692.html
Curtner‐Smith, M. (1999). The more things change the more they stay the same: Factors
influencing teachers' interpretations and delivery of national curriculum. Physical
Education, Sport, Education and Society, 4(1), 75-97. doi: 10.1080/1357332990040106
Curtner‐Smith, M. & Meek, G. (2000). Teachers’ value orientations and their compatibility with
the national curriculum for physical education. European Physical Education Review 6
(1), 27–45. Retrieved from
http://journals.sagepub.com.libproxy.stfx.ca/doi/pdf/10.1177/1356336X000061004
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 64
Dana, Nancy Fichtman & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2014). Quality indicators for assessing your own
inquiry. The Reflective Educator’s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach and
Teaching to Learn through Practitioner Inquiry (3rd ed.), pp. 227-234. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Corwin Press.
Darst, P. W. & Pangrazi, R. P. (2002). Evaluation and grading. In P. A. Smith (Ed.), Dynamic
physical education for secondary school students (pp. 207-233). San Francisco, CA:
Benjamin Cummings.
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (2015a). Physical education
essential learning outcomes 2015–2016 (Primary–3). Retrieved from
https://www.ednet.ns.ca/files/curriculum/PhysEdP-3ProgressionChart-RevJuly30
2015.pdf
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (2014a). Physical education
primary -3: Draft November 2014. Retrieved from
https://educators.ednet.ns.ca/pydio/ws-educators/Physical%20Education/Draft%20Phys
%20Ed%20Guides/PE%20P-3%20for%20Sept%202015
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2014b). Physical education 4-6:
Draft November 2014. Retrieved from
https://educators.ednet.ns.ca/pydio/ws-educators/Physical%20Education/Draft%20Phys
%20Ed%20Guides/PE%204-6%20for%20Sept%202015
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 65
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2015b). Physical education 4–6
(streamlined curriculum). Retrieved from
https://www.ednet.ns.ca/files/curriculum/physed_4-6_streamlined.pdf
Dismore, Harriet & Bailey, Richard. (2011). Fun and enjoyment in physical education: young
people’s attitudes. Research Papers in Education, 26(4), 499-516.
doi: 10.1080/02671522.2010.484866
Dyson, B. P. (1995). Students' voices in two alternative elementary physical education
programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14(4), 394-407.
Dyson, Ben. (2014). Quality physical education: A commentary on effective physical
education teaching. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 144-152.
doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.904155
Ennis, Catherine D. (1992). Curriculum theory as practiced: Case studies of operationalized
value orientations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 358-375. Retrieved
from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/C_Ennis_Curriculum_1992.pdf
Ennis, Catherine D. (2014). The role of students and content in teacher effectiveness.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 6–13.
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 66
doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.872979
Catherine D. Ennis (2017). Educating students for a lifetime of physical activity: Enhancing
mindfulness, motivation, and meaning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(3),
241-250. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2017.1342495
Ennis & Chen (1993a). Value orientation inventory VOI-2:1992. Retrieved from Professor
Daniel Robinson, EDUC 508, March 2018.
Ennis & Chen (1993b). Scoring guide for VOI-2. Retrieved from Professor Daniel Robinson,
EDUC 508, March 2018.
Fletcher, Tim & Ovens, Alan. (2015). Self-study in physical education: bridging personal and
public understandings in professional practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and
Physical Education, 6(3), 215-219. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2015.1092721
Fletcher, Tim, Ni Chroinin, Déirdre & O’Sullivan, Mary. (2016). A Layered Approach to critical
friendship as a means to support pedagogical innovation in pre-service teacher education.
Studying Teacher Education, 12(3), 302-319. doi: 10.1080/17425964.2016.1228049
Garn, Alex & Cothran, Donetta. (2006). The fun factor in physical education. The Journal of
Teaching Physical Education. 25, 281-297. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.25.3.281
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 67
Hamilton, Mary Lynn & Pinnegar, Stephinee. (2015). Considering the role of self- study of
teaching and teacher education practices research in transforming urban classrooms,
Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 180-190. doi: 10.1080/17425964.2015.1045775
Kretchmar, R. Scott. (2000). Movement subcultures: Sites for meaning. Journal of Physical
Education, Recreation & Dance, 71(5), 19-25. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2000.10605140
Kretchmar, R. Scott. (2006) Ten more reasons for quality physical education. Journal of
Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 77(9), 6-9
doi: 10.1080/07303084.2006.10597932
Kretchmar, R. Scott (2008). The increasing utility of elementary school physical education: A
mixed blessing and unique challenge. The Elementary School Journal, 108(3) 161-170.
doi: 10.1086/529099
LaBoskey, Vicki Kubler. (2015). Self-study for and by novice elementary classroom teachers
with social justice aims and the implications for teacher education. Studying Teacher
Education, 11(2), 97-102. doi: 10.1080/17425964.2015.1045770
Learning About Meaningful Physical Education (LAMPE) Blog (2016, April 22). Why prioritize
meaningful engagement in physical activity setting with children and young people?
(web log comment). Retrieved from https://meaningfulpe.wordpress.com/blog/
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 68
MacDougall, Colin, Schiller, Wendy & Darbyshire, Philip. (2004). We have to live in the future,
Early Child Development and Care, 174(4), 369-387.
doi: 10.1080/0300443032000153426
McEvoy, E., Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & MacPhail, A. (2015). Physical education teacher
educators’ views regarding the purpose(s) of school physical education. Sport, Education
and Society, 22(7), 812-824. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2015.1075971
Merriam, Sharan B. & Tisdell, Elizabeth J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and
implementation (4th ed.). Wiley. Kindle Edition.
Ni Chroinin, Déirdre, Fletcher, Tim & O'Sullivan, Mary. (2015). Using self- study to explore the
processes of pedagogical innovation in physical education teacher education. Asia-
Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 6(3), 273-286.
doi: 10.1080/18377122.2015.1092724
Nicaise, V., Cogerino, G., Fairclough, S., Bois, J., & Davis, K. (2007). Teacher feedback and
interactions in physical education: Effects of student gender and physical activities
European Physical Education Review, 13(3), 319–337. doi: 10.1177/1356336X07081799
Nova Scotia Teachers Union (NSTU) (2017). NSTU guidebook: Constitution, policy.
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 69
Pangrazi. R. P. & Beighle, A. (2010). Dynamic physical education for elementary school
children (16th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Quennerstedt, Mikael. (2013). PE on YouTube – investigating participation in physical education
practice. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(1), 42-59.
doi: 10.1080/17408989.2011.631000
Ryan, Richard M., Frederick, Christine M., Lepes, Deborah, Rubio, Noel, and Sheldon, Kennon
M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. International Journal of Sport
Psychology, 28. 335-354. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
279910235_Intrinsic_Motivation_and_Exercise_Adherence
Simmons, J. and MacLean, J. (2016). Physical education teachers’ perceptions of factors that
inhibit and facilitate the enactment of curriculum change in high stakes exam climate.
Sport, Education and Society, volume and pages doi:10.1080/13573322.2016.1155444
Smith, Andy & Parr, Michael. (2007). Young people's views on the nature and purposes of
physical education: a sociological analysis. Sport, Education and Society, 12(1), 37-58.
doi: 10.1080/13573320601081526
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 70
Stuckey HL. (2015). The second step in data analysis: Coding qualitative research data.
Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 3, 7-10. Retrieved from
http://www.joshd.net/text.asp?2015/3/1/7/140875
Subramaniam, Prithwi Raj. (2010). Unlocking the power of situational interest in physical
education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(7), 38-49. doi:
10.1080/07303084.2010.10598507
Teixeira, Pedro J., Carraça, Eliana V., Markland, David, Silva, Marlene N., and Ryan,
Richard M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A
systematic review. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical
Activity, 9(1), 78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78
Van Ritchie, Todd. (2017). Exploring physical education teachers' value orientations as
practiced: A case study of three elementary physical educators. 31. Research Proposal for
EDUC 507.
Walseth, Kristin, Engebretsen, Berit & Elvebakk, Lisbeth. (2018). Meaningful experiences in PE
for all students: an activist research approach. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.
23(3), 235-249. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2018.1429590
Wright, Lesley J M. (2004) Preserving the value of happiness in primary school physical
education, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 9(2), 149-163.
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 71
doi: 10.1080/1740898042000294967
Yoon, Keejoon & Armour, Kathleen M. (2017) Mapping physical education teachers’
professional learning and impacts on pupil learning in a community of practice in South
Korea. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(4), 427-444.
doi: 10.1080/17408989.2016.1268589
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 72
Footnotes
1[Add footnotes, if any, on their own page following references. For APA formatting
requirements, it’s easy to just type your own footnote references and notes. To format a footnote
reference, select the number and then apply the Footnote Reference. The body of a footnote,
such as this example, uses the Normal text style. (Note: If you delete this sample footnote, don’t
forget to delete its in-text reference as well.)]
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 73
Tables
Table 1
A brief description of the five value orientations
Orientation Description
Discipline Mastery (DM) a teacher who emphasizes knowledge and skills.
Learning Process (LP) a teacher who emphasizes the development of process skills for
independent learning regardless of content.
Self-Actualization (SA) a teacher who emphasizes the continual development of an
individual’s autonomy
Social Responsibility (SR) a teacher who encourages pupils to respect and cooperate with
others
Ecological Integration (EI) a teacher who promotes personal meaning for students via
collaboratively developed curricular experiences to achieve
personal and social goals
(Chen et.al., 2017)
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 74
Table 2. Framework-for-inquiry analytic tool
Topic Questions focused on the self…
Purpose What is the purpose of the study?
Definition of
S-STEP
What definition of S-STEP does the author use? Where is the self-
situated in this study?
Definition of
S-STEP
methodology
When the author describes methodology, how is it apparent that the
study is a S-STEP? How does the author describe the methodology?
Rigorous
research practice
What data collection and data analysis tools are used? How are the
aspects of the methodology described? How did the author make
apparent thoughtful research practice? As part of making a study
rigorous comes in the context selected for study, in what way or
ways do the context support the rigor of the study?
Explicit
evidence
In what ways does the author connect the data collected with the
assertions made in the study? For example, if they said that they
interviewed people, how is that displayed in the evidence? Does the
evidence collected allow for the insights the author claims?
Authority of
experience
How does the author situate the authority of her/his own experience
in the study? How do he/she situate themselves in the study so that
the readers will accept their work as trustworthy?
Story of self In what ways is the self-portrayed in the study? Where is the self in
relationship with others? How is the self-evident?
Situate in larger
literature
Within what research literatures does the author situate their work?
How do they bring depth to the understandings of their field of
focus?
1449
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 75
(Hamilton & Pinnegar, 2015, p.183)1450
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 76
Table 3. Quality Indicators for Teacher Research
Indicator Questions to ponder
Context of
Study
o Have I considered all aspects of my context? Will others be able to
understand where my thoughts and wonderings emerge from based
on the description of the context?
Wonderings and
Purpose
o Have I effectively described my dilemma? Have I connected my
wonderings to related literature? Are my wonderings focused on me
and my personal practice?
Teacher-
Researcher
Design
o Have I considered all possible data sources and the number of data
sources used? Is my timeline flexible? Is it realistic?
Teacher-
Researcher
Learning
o How will I illustrate my findings? Am I confident my findings
emerged from the data rather than forcing the data to fit pre-
determined findings? Can I explain data that didn’t fit? Did these
findings resonate with me through my reflections?
Implications for
Practice
o Will these results lead to action within my practice? Are they logical
outgrowths of what I learned in my inquiry? Are there further
wonderings that can grow out of my inquiry?
(Dana & Yendol-Hoppey, 2014)
1451
1452
1453
1454
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 77
Table 4. Data Sources and Prompts
Source Prompts
Documents Lesson topic? Lesson outcomes? What am I explicitly
attempting to do/teach/present in this lesson? In this unit?
What model is being used?
Written Reflections Do I feel that the students are getting what I want from the
lesson? Is my focus similar to what they are experiencing?
Non-participant
Observer
What do students seem to be doing during lesson? What are
you observing in their behaviours? Are they on task,
developing a skill? Interest in activity? Do they appear to be
having fun, experiencing joy or delight? Are they being
challenged appropriately? What social interactions are being
observed?
Critical Friend
Discussion
What resonated with me from our discussion was… I would
approach this lesson by…I suggest that you…
Student Voice Do you find this activity relevant to you? Is it challenging?
Would you describe it as fun or delightful? What is your
favorite activity, why?
1455
1456
1457
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 78
Table 5. A Priori Coding – potential codes and behaviours
Code Behaviours to observe
Fun and/or Delight Happiness, laughing, engagement, joy
Challenge Too easy, too hard, appropriate
Frustration, errors, off task
Interactions Positive, negative
o Student-student, student-teacher, teacher-student
Behaviour, social, critical,
constructive/corrective
Motor Competence Practicing skill
o Proper performance, uses feedback
Personally Relevant Engagement, interest
1458
1459
1460
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 79
Table 6: Value Orientation Instrument - Results
DM LP SA EI SR0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Apil 27th June 6th
1461
1462
1463
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 80
Table 7: Student voice in PE survey results
PE is Fun
A Goo
d Cha
lleng
e
Too Easy
Too H
ard
Positiv
e Soc
ial In
teract
ions
Enjoy S
kill D
evelo
pmen
t
I am im
provin
g
Releva
nt to
me
Life lo
ng m
emori
es0
24
6
810
12
1416
18
Grade 4 Grade 5
1464
1465
1466
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 81
Table 8: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey - FUN
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 82
Table 9: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – SOCIAL INTERACTIONS
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of their social interactions with peers in the
groupings and activities this spring.
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 83
Table 10: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – CHALLENGE
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of how easy to hard the students found it to
be successful in the activities this spring.
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 84
Table 11: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of how easy to hard the students found it to
be successful in the activities this spring.
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 85
Table 12: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – DELIGHT
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of memorable and delightful the activities
were this spring.
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 86
Table 13: Spring Physical Education Activities Survey – PERSONAL RELEVANCE
Note: Ratings are based on the student’s perception of how important or relevant the activities
were to the student this spring.
Bobsled /Luge/Skeleton
Spikeball Rounders Kicking Skills
4 Corner Soccer Intro to Golf Tchoukball
Gymnastics Bars
Gymnastics Floor
Gymnastics Beam
Gymnastics Vault
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 87
Figures
Figure 1. Search Protocol Flowchart
1596
1597
1598
1599
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 88
Figure 2: Non-participant observer – student grade, gender and ethnicity breakdown1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 89
Figure 3: Meaningful Experiences Observed 1617
1618
1619
MEANINGFUL PHYSICAL EDUCATION 90
1620