Using Data to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Professional Development
description
Transcript of Using Data to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Professional Development
Nebraska Department of Education 2012 Data Conference
It's More Than NumbersApril 2-3, 2012
Using Data to Evaluate the Effectiveness
of Professional Development
Sue Anderson, Ph.D., ESU 3Don Johnson, Fort Calhoun Community Schools
Bill Menousek, ESU 3
Using Data to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Professional Development
Session Topics Project Rationale
Project Description
District Perspective
Evaluation Design
Results
Project Design Rationale
Characteristics of high quality professional development:
Offered for a longer duration and greater frequency
Involves teachers directly for more hours in active, engaged learning activities and environments
Focused on a particular content area and allows teachers to gain knowledge on how to teach the content to their students
Desimone, L. (2009). How can we best measure teacher’s professional development and its effects on teachers and students? Educational Researcher 38(3): 181-199.
Project Design Rationale
Characteristics of high quality professional development:
Coherent to teachers’ needs and circumstances
Involves teachers learning from their peers through collective participation
Desimone, L. (2009). How can we best measure teacher’s professional development and its effects on teachers and students? Educational Researcher 38(3): 181-199.
Project Description
Professional Learning Model: Improving Vocabulary and 21st
Century Skills
Professional Learning Model Overview
The 3 Pillars of the Face-2-Face
Learning Program
1. The content will referenceand be clearly focused onthe goal of the project.
CONTENT
2. The pedagogy will always include the identification and implementation of 21st century skill(s) in teaching.
PEDAGOGY
3. The inclusion of technologywill be appropriate to support #1 & #2.
TECHNOLOGY
Face-2-Face Framework
• The goal of the project is reiterated.
• The content is delivered and a video of the instruction is made available on the Fort Calhoun web site.
• Input for videoconference follow-up is gathered.
• Support documentation for PLGs is distributed and explained.
• A brief preview of the next F-2-F learning is presented.
Videoconference
Project Participants
Fort Calhoun K-12 teaching staff
Administrators
ESU #3 PDD Staff Consultants▪ CIA▪ Instructional
Technology
Data Specialist
Technology Support Specialist
School District Perspective
Project Evaluation
Evaluation Design
Findings
Conclusions
Recommendations
Project Evaluation - Design Data Collection
Surveys (FC staff – one per cycle) Survey (ESU #3 staff – end of project) Interviews Artifacts Assessment Data – NeSA /NWEA MAP
Reading/Vocabulary
Data Analysis Excel formats (tables, charts, graphs) Coding for themes
Project Evaluation-Design
Survey Item Topics Confidence in PD content and strategies Implementation of strategies Project format PLGs Student engagement
Findings
School District Survey Findings
Topic Agree/Strongly Agree
Confidence in understanding content/ strategies*
82%
Implemented strategies 86%Frequency of strategy implementation
Daily 31%1-2 times per week 46%
1-2 times per month 15%
School District Survey Findings
Topic Agree/Strongly Agree
Project format** 52%
PLGs useful 64%
Student engagement positive 78%
School District Survey Findings * Project Content
▪ Elementary staff more favorable to content
▪ Videoconference sessions not as effective
▪ PLGs not utilized effectively
** Project Format▪ Preferred face-to-
face sessions
▪ Videoconference sessions not as effective
▪ PLGs not utilized effectively
ESU #3 Staff Survey Findings
Topic Agree/Strongly Agree
Project’s support of teacher and student goals
100%
Project format supported goals 78%Predictions
Implementation of strategies 96%Frequency of strategy implementation
Daily 0%1-2 times per week 50%
1-2 times per month 33%
ESU #3 Staff Survey Findings
Topic Agree/Strongly Agree
School participant response positive
100%
Adequate/effective resources for project implementation
89%
Adequate/effective processes for project implementation
72%
Student Test Data Findings
NeSA Reading Vocabulary 2010 and 2011▪ Gains in only two grade levels (grades 3 and 6)▪ Significant decline in Grade 11
NWEA MAP Reading Vocabulary 2010-2011▪ Three test administrations▪ Overall increases in grades (3,4,5,6,7,9)▪ Significant decline in Grade 11
Conclusions
Project Conclusions
Survey/interview data support criteria for effective PD content reflecting best available
research and practice content is coherent to teachers’ needs opportunities to learn content based
instructional strategies appropriate technologies to support
student learning
Project Conclusions
professional learning experiences for a longer duration and greater frequency
Involve teachers in learning from their peers through collective participation
Evaluate the effectiveness of the professional learning experience.
Recommendations
Project Recommendations
General Align PD with research-based practices
Fort Calhoun Continue to focus on vocabulary
achievement Focus on Grade 11 achievement Review expectations for PLGs
Project Recommendations ESU #3
Continue to align PD planning with research-based criteria for effectiveness
Utilize collaboration as development and implementation strategies
Incorporate 21st century skills and technology
Expand the analysis of student achievement data
Include evaluation processes
Align PD directly with student learning outcomes (i.e. goals, standards, indicators, etc.)
Project Recommendations
General Align PD with research-based practices
Fort Calhoun Continue to focus on vocabulary
achievement ( Grade 11) Review expectations for PLGs
Project Recommendations
ESU #3 Continue to align PD planning with
research-based criteria for effectiveness
Utilize collaboration as development and implementation strategies
Incorporate 21st century skills and technology
Project Recommendations
ESU #3 Include evaluation processes
Expand the analysis of student achievement data
Align PD directly with student learning outcomes (i.e. goals, standards, indicators, etc.)
Comments…Questions