Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality
Transcript of Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality
![Page 1: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Build vs Buy
DebateBest Practices for EHS and Quality management
![Page 2: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Why Software at All?
• Home Grown vs
Commercial
• What are the “Table
Stakes”
• Going Beyond Simple
Workflows
![Page 3: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
First the Buzzwords
![Page 4: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What This Really Means
“It's about getting things down
to one number. Using the stats
the way we read them, we'll find
value in players that no one else
can see.”
![Page 5: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Your Challenge (Mine Too)
1. Paper, paper, paper
2. Excel based analysis
3. Manual tracking
Value of data is hidden
![Page 6: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Uncover Data to Drive Decisions
Chaotic
•No Standards
•No master data plan
•No strategy
Reactive
•Standards established
•Master data plan identified
•Easing of communication
Defined
•Master data plan executed
•Root cause for issues can be tracked and measured
Proactive
•Continuous feedback loops
•Root cause analysis feeding into feedback process
•Information silos removed
Predictive
•People, process and technology working together
… and be like Brad Pitt
![Page 7: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
You’ve Pretty Much Got 2 Options
![Page 8: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Option #1
Home
Grown Apps
• Build From Scratch
• Internal Dev Resources
• Existing Tools (CMS, Database, ERP etc…)
![Page 9: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The possibility of “Perfect Fit.” Custom software tailored to the organization
Potentially lower initial cost (reuse existing tools)
Pride of Ownership – potential for internal knowledge asset
Pros of Building Your Own
9
![Page 10: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Shortage of EHS and Quality experience
• Learning curve (User experience not a priority)
• Cost of ongoing innovation
• Cost of ongoing support
• Staffing to meet project scope
Cons of Building Your Own
10
![Page 11: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In Fact
U.S. businesses spend over $300 billion annually
trying to develop in-house solutions.
Only 29% of projects succeed, while nearly 52% are
highly challenged and 19% fail outright.
* The Standish Group International
![Page 12: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
More Importantly
Only addressing the “Table
Stakes” of data management
… NOT like Brad Pitt
![Page 13: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Option #2
EHS and
Quality
Platforms
• Purpose built platforms to manage EHS and Quality data
• Build in subject matter expertise
• Value added capabilities
![Page 14: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Perceived loss of control
• Tradeoffs between the perfect solution and the vendor offering
• Failure to engage in-house IT resources
• Knowing what questions to ask new vendor to minimize risk
Cons of Buying
14
![Page 15: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Experienced EHS and Quality vendor can deliver quickly
Top vendors bring real-world experience (this is what others like you have done)
Validated industry successes
Lower total cost of ownership
Pros of Buying
15
![Page 16: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Go Beyond The “Table Stakes”
Chaotic
•No Standards
•No master data plan
•No strategy
Reactive
•Standards established
•Master data plan identified
•Easing of communication
Defined
•Master data plan executed
•Root cause for issues can be tracked and measured
Proactive
•Continuous feedback loops
•Root cause analysis feeding into feedback process
•Information silos removed
Predictive
•People, process and technology working together
Home Grown Apps Commercial Platforms
![Page 17: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• BA Blacktop’s incident rates
dropped from 7.18 to 1.38
per year & spills reduced
58%
• Agnico Eagle’s accident
frequency rate dropped 50%
• Smurfit Kappa saw a 58%
reduction in lost time
accidents
• Boral Bricks experienced
63% reduction in recordable
incidents
Client Success - EHS
![Page 18: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Versabar saw a decrease of
39% in their cost of quality
• Rapid-Span estimated an 80%
reduction in time to compile
nonconformance summary
reports
• Nexteer streamlined the
management of 1,400 suppliers
worldwide
• Town of Ajax was the first
municipality in North America to
achieve ISO 9001 certification,
managing more than 10,000
documents
Client Success - Quality
![Page 20: Using data to drive strategic decisions in EHS and quality](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022042723/58ee5f181a28aba8268b461b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Any Questions?Because that was a lot of information.