Using 4Sight Assessments
description
Transcript of Using 4Sight Assessments
Using 4Sight Data to Drive Instruction
Tina Keller
Paula Bredl
MIU#4
Purpose of Benchmark Assessments
Benchmarks allow you to take a pulse
and not an autopsy.
Dr. Robert Slavin Success For All Foundation
DATA
Analysis/ Discovery
Solutions
Data-Informed Decision-Making Framework
Student Planning Process
Focus: Classroom of Students
Who: Teacher
Periodic Grade Level Planning Process
Focus: Groups of StudentsWho: Teacher Teams
How: Regular 1-2 hour meetings
Annual Building-wide Planning ProcessFocus: All Students
Who: School-wide TeamHow: Data Retreat, School Planning Process
District-Level Support(Budgetary Support, Professional Development, Resources and Time)
Student Learning Data
School Structures for Data-Informed Decision Making
School LevelPSSA & PVAAS
Standardized AssessmentsDistrict End-of-Year Tests
Final Benchmark Test
Classroom Level Initial: PSSA/PVAAS/final tests – student levelCyclical: •Benchmark Data – Student LevelContinuous•Individual Classroom Assessments•Progress Monitoring
Grade/Course LevelInitial: PSSA/PVAAS/final tests – class/subgroup levelsCyclical:
•Benchmark Data - grade level•District quarterly assessments•Common Classroom Data•Classroom Summaries
School Level •School Demographics•Discipline Data•Attendance Data•Mobility Rate
Grade/Course Level•Class Demographics •Class Engagement Data•Satisfaction Data•Attendance Data
Classroom LevelQualitative Data•Student Historical Information•Student Medical Information•Student Learning Information
Reports Available from 4Sight
Estimate of student performance on the PSSA by district, school, grade, individual level
Subgroup data Subscale reports for Math and Reading Item Analysis on test questions Individual student bar graphs
Math Proficiencies
Gr GP Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced T BP P %Proficient
6 B 29 14 4 1 48 43 5 10
6 1 <> <>
6 2 <> <>
6 3 <> <>
6 4 <> <>
Gr = Grade GP = Grading Period T = Total Number Of Students P = Proficient Students BP = Below Proficient Students
Sub-Scale Reports by Grade
Students Total Numbers and Operations (A) 13
Measurement (B) 6 Geometry (C) 4 Algebraic Concepts (D) 6
Data Analysis & Probability (E) 5
Joe Smith 17.0(40.48%) 6.0 (46.15%) 3.0 (50.0%) 3.0 (75.0%) 2.0 (33.33%) 2.0 (40.0%)
Averages 50.48 50.77 60.00 85.00 43.33 60.00
Individual Reports by Subscale
Item Analysis Report
Kit lives in a town where 6,307 children live. How is that number correctly written in words?
Respondents # Picked %
A six thousand, three hundred seven 27 9 33.33%
B six thousand, three hundred and seven 27 11 40.74%
C six thousand, three seven 27 5 18.52%
D sixty-three, and seven 27 2 7.41%
Let’s Look at Your Data“Data should be shared and analyzed by all members of the school community.”
(DuFour, DuFour, Ealer & Many, 2006)
Using Data Packets Handouts to Share Guiding Questions to Ask
– How many students were proficient? (Math/Reading and by Sub Groups)
– What are areas of strengths and weaknesses?– Why are we getting these results? – What did I do as a teacher to contribute to these results?– What is our challenge?
The Key to a Results-Driven Culture
Teams of teachers and administrators who… Share a common vision and set of goals Collect data on student performance Analyze these data Meet regularly to interpret these data for the
purpose of informing instructional decisions focused on increasing student achievement