LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents...
Transcript of LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents...
![Page 1: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LCDR Wade W. Gough USCG Sector Puget Sound (srm)
Chief, Incident Management Division
![Page 2: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose
• To idenCfy improvements for a coordinated response involving hazardous substances using local case studies and focusing within the State of Washington.
Why? The Cost is too high for mistakes.
“Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes” -‐ Oscar Wilde
![Page 3: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Vision
• To prepare in order to miCgate impacts of a potenCal disaster to maximize resiliency in keeping with the goal of the 2010 DraO NaConal Disaster Recovery Framework that states: “successful recovery depends on all stakeholders and every level of government being prepared to work collaboraCvely and effecCvely prior to and aOer a disaster.” (p. 15).
![Page 4: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
AssumpCons
• Radiological incident does NOT involve U.S. DOE or DoD facility
• Response does not focus on the medical & public health factors (e.g., medical a[enCon/triage) of a Nuk/Rad Incident
![Page 5: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Oil Spills vs. HAZMAT/HAZSUB Incidents
Oil Spill Radiological/Nuclear Incident
Sharing InformaCon Open disseminaCon Limited DistribuCon?
Common OperaCng Pic Numerous opCons Limited – HSIN? Fusion Center?
NaConal Security Interests None to low Medium to High (unCl cause determined)
Command Post Fully staffed May not exist locally
Support Staff Large Planning SecCon OperaCons SecCon only?
Equipment Technology Low High
Level of local involvement High Low (depends of technical capabiliCes of locaCon)
Use of Volunteers Yes No
DuraCon of Response Short (relaCvely) Can be prolonged
Visible Yes No (radiaCon)
Funding (Federal) OSLTF CERCLA
Media / Public Interest Moderate –High High -‐ panic
![Page 6: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Responding to Radiological / HAZMAT Incidents
• What makes Radiological/Nuclear Response Different ?
• Maritime / Terrestrial / Rail HAZMAT Incidents – are there inherent differences in how we respond to these categories of incidents?
• What are the primary resources for policy / guidance for responding to a HAZSUB incident?
![Page 7: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Case Study #1
MariCme Incident
![Page 9: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
M/V MCP ALTONA Uranium Ore PotenCal Incident
After leaving Vancouver, BC on 23 Dec for Zhanjiang, China, the M/V MCP ALTONA encountered heavy seas causing below deck containers with drums to shift and release a low level radiation material. The ship’s hold remains covered, watertight, and there is no damage to the ship.
• Lead is Canadian Gov’t: (Transport Canada, Canadian CG, etc)
• USCG Key Actions: Validate status of cargo Monitor transit via JHOC/VTS Work with Transport Canada Marine Safety on
inspection requirements Evaluate need for tug escort Cutter shadow & aircraft flyover (pictures) • U.S. Government Coordination: USCG Sector Puget Sound lead Trustees: EPA, Dept of Interior, & NOAA
Support: U.S. Dept. of Energy State OSC Co-Lead: WA Dept of Ecology & Dept of
Health
U/W 05 JAN 2011
![Page 10: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Authority to Respond
• NRF -‐> NUK/Rad Incident Annex -‐> – CERCLA : gives Fed Gov’t authority to compel RPs to respond to releases of hazardous substances.
– NCP: Mechanism of implementaCon of CERCLA authority (uses OCSs)
– Title 50, USC, War & NaConal Defense: Military Commander can establish “NaConal Defense Area” around incident to protect nuclear weapons & materials in DOD custody
![Page 12: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Ch 7000 Contents
• AuthoriCes • DefiniCons • OrganizaCon (refers to CG IMH)
• NoCficaCons • References some resources
![Page 13: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
USCG Internal AcCons (QRC)
• Level 2 (Know the rad source) • PotenCal for “possible” terrorist or threatening intent at any Cme during boarding – Fed LE & DADSAFE (naConal noCficaCon alert) – AcCvates naConal policy guidance & need for informaCon sharing
• IdenCfied Most Likely Port (Port Angeles) – allowed for County coordinaCon/ planning
![Page 15: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
USCG Lessons Learned
• 1° Response Partner/SOSC: WA Dept of Health, not WA DOE (note 1)
• Immediate availability of U.S. DOE RAP Team 8
• InformaCon sharing was problemaCc – InformaCon control
– Timely sharing among key partners
Note 1: USCG Sector liaised frequently w/ WA DOE and kept abreast of information but WA DOH staffed command post and served key role in Fed decision making processes.
![Page 17: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Case Study #2
Railway Incident
![Page 19: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
BNSF Derailment
![Page 20: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
KFI
KFI
KFI
WRS
CW
CW
CW
CW
CW
CW
CENTRAL WASHINGTON
PORTLAND VANCOUVER JUNCTION RR.KETTLE FALLS INTERNATIONAL
WESTERN RAIL SWITCHING
PVJR
WIR
EWG
* WASHINGTON & IDAHO RR.
* EASTERN WASHINGTON GATEWAY
* ROYAL SLOPE RR. * STATE OWNED RAIL LINE
PVJR
EWGEWG
WIR
WIR
CW
WRS
KFI
![Page 21: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Coast Guard BNSF Railway
Typing Incidents Type 1 = Most Complex Level 1 = Least Complex
Number of ClassificaCons to measure scale of emergency response
5 (1 = worst/ 5 = single unit response)
3 (Level 3 involves mulCple agencies, sustained evacuaCons)
Response Contractors/ Support
OSROs/ BOAs Organic?
Primary response interacCon
Other federal & state agencies, contractors, local gov’t
Internal support & fire chief on scene as applicable
LocaCon of C2 Center Sea[le , WA Forth Worth, TX
Regulatory Oversight U.S. DHS U.S. DOT
ICS Capability Full ICS Staffing OperaCons SecCon/Technical
NaConal CoordinaCon Center for Crises
NaConal OperaCons Center (NOC), Wash, DC
Network OperaCons Center (NOC), Fort Worth, TX
Comparing USCG to Railway*
*Comparison based from USCG Sector Puget Sound focusing on Washington State only and comparing solely to BNSF Railway.
![Page 22: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Complexity of Rail Incident
![Page 25: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
USCG Lessons Learned
• SOSC was WA Dept of Ecology but not o/s enCre Cme
• Site access can be difficult
• RR reported full use of NIMS ICS but in reality were not familiar /clarity of roles & compeCng prioriCes
• InformaCon sharing was problemaCc – Be[er scene / site info disseminaCon could have reduced footprint onsite
![Page 26: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Case Study #3
Fixed Terrestrial Site
![Page 27: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Challenges to Response Mgt
• Technical response -‐> Assignment of Personnel • Use of NIMS ICS during slow response – hard to implement
• LocaCon of Command Team – Onsite or connected via C.O.P. medium?
• Technical Skills Required of Oversight Tms – use responders or acCvate technical support (e.g., Pacific Strike Team)
![Page 28: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Your Turn
• Explain how your local jurisdicCon, unit, or organizaCon aligns w/ a major Railway during a specific hazardous substance incident? Do you train with them rouCnely?
• InformaCon sharing: how can we meet the needs of agency, internaConal, & local partners need to know while sCll controlling with whom we share?
![Page 29: LCDRWadeW.Gough USCGSectorPugetSound(srm) … Case Studies... · 2016. 4. 26. · TypingIncidents Type1=MostComplex Level1=LeastComplex NumberofClassificaons tomeasurescaleof emergencyresponse%](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071218/60538fb7ba69fb3e9f0b96a1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
“It’s not what you look at that ma[ers, it’s what you see”
– Henry David Thoreau