URBAN RURAL DIVIDE - 4th Smart Cities India 2018 … OF INDIA CONTINUES TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS...

45
URBAN RURAL DIVIDE

Transcript of URBAN RURAL DIVIDE - 4th Smart Cities India 2018 … OF INDIA CONTINUES TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS...

URBAN RURAL DIVIDE

68% OF INDIA CONTINUES TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS

AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SERVICE, CONTRIBUTION TO GDP REDUCED FROM 52% IN 1950 TO 14% IN 2013 WHILE 50% OF THE OVERALL LABOUR FORCE IS STILL DEPENDANT ON AGRICULTURE, THIS SITUATION IS DEFINITELY NOT SUSTAINABLE.

26% OF RURAL INDIA IS POOR COMPARED TO 14% IN URBAN AREAS.

RURAL LITERACY RATE MUCH LOWER THAN URBAN LITERACY RATE

EDUCATION - RATE OF FALL OF NET ATTENDANCE FROM PRIMARY TO SECONDARY IS MUCH STEEPER IN THE RURAL AREAS.

HEALTH INDICATORS- RURAL INDIA LAGS BEHIND URBAN INDIA IN ALL THE INDICATORS- INFANT MORTALITY RATE, % OF ANEMIC POPULATION & ACCESS TO BASIC SERVICES.

URBAN RURAL DIVIDE SOME GLARING STATISTICS

NATIONAL RURBAN MISSION

NRuM

3

MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

“Development of a cluster of villages that preserve and nurture the essence of rural community life with focus on equity and inclusiveness without

compromising with the facilities perceived to be essentially urban in nature, thus creating a cluster of “ Rurban Villages”.

INCEPTION AND CONTEXT

4

RURBAN CONTEXT & NRuM

5

Rural Areas typically thrive in clusters with potential for growth, economic drivers and locational and competitive advantages.

Hence, making a case for concerted policy directives for such clusters. These clusters once developed can then be classified as ‘Rurban’.

Taking into account the advantages of development of clusters of rural areas, the National Rurban Mission was conceptualized .

Approved by the Union Cabinet on 16th September, 2015 and launched by the Honorable Prime Minister on 21st February, 2016.

NRuM Launch by the Hon’ble Prime Minister from Dongargarh, Chattisgarh on 21st February, 2016

6

WHAT IS A RURBAN CLUSTER?

HOW ARE THEY SELECTED?

7

RURBAN CLUSTERS- KEY FEATURES

8

Rurban clusters, would be a cluster of geographically contiguous villages

with a population of about 25000 to 50000 in plain and coastal areas and a

population of 5000 to 15000 in desert, hilly or tribal areas.

The cluster selection is based on a scientific method based on various

parameters of growth. This involved an objective analysis at the District, Sub

District and Village level, of the demography, economy, tourism & pilgrimage

significance and transportation corridor impact, also leveraging on the land

prices and the increase in non -farm work participation.

9 9

STEP 1- SEPARATION OF NON TRIBAL AND TRIBAL DISTRICTS Identification of Top 100 Tribal Districts in the Country from Census 2011 and separation of Non Tribal and

Tribal Districts in a State

IDENTIFICATION OF NON TRIBAL RURBAN SUB DISTRICTS IN A STATE

STEP 2- IDENTIFICATION OF TOP 50 SUB DISTRICTS FROM THE NON TRIBAL DISTRICTS IN A STATE Based on Decadal Increase in Rural Population

STEP 3- RANKING OF TOP 50 SUBDISTRICTS TO IDENTIFY THE LEADING SUB DISTRICTS IN A STATE

STEPS BY MoRD

Decadal Growth in Rural Population- 35% weightage

Decadal Growth in Non Farm Work Participation Ratio -35% weightage

Presence of Economic Clusters in the district-10% weightage

Tourism & Pilgrimage Significance of the district- 10% weightage

Proximity to Transport Corridors- 10% weightage

CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY

Poonamallee

Sriperumbudur

Chengalpattu

Thanjavur

Madurai North

Tirunelveli

Madurai South

Palayamkottai

Coimbatore North

Tiruppur

Karnataka

TAMIL NADU TOP NON-TRIBAL SUB DISTRICTS

2

6

9

1

10

7

3

11

4

8 Avanashi 5

Thiruvallur 12

Karaikkudi 13

Sivaganga

Coimbatore South 14

Ponneri 15

Kalkulam

Ambattur 17

Theni 19

Hosur 20

18

16

ODISHA TOP SUB DISTRICTS (Non-Tribal)

11

ODISHA

Jajapur Road

Khalikote Sadar

Bhrampur

Baidyeswar Banki 1

Kanpur

5

Burden Kolabira

2

3

Banapur 4

Serango 6

Golanthara 7

8

9

Adva

12

Belpahar 13 Jaleswar

Gaisilet

Tangi 16

Paikamal

18

15

Mohana

10

11

19

Ulunda 20

DISTRICT- CHITRAKOOT, BLOCK CLUSTER MAU MUSTKIL UTTAR PRADESH, POPULATION: 47813

Bambura

Konpa

Dhawada Mau Mustkil

LEGEND

Block Headquarter

Largest Village (as per Population 2011)

Identified Villages

Ahiri

Suraundha

Dhaddhwar Rataura

Mawai Kalan Mustkil

Mandaur

Sikraun

Dubari

Identified Villages

SAMASINGHA CLUSTER, KOLABIRA BLOCK, JHARSUGUDA DISTRICT, ODISHA; POPULATION:31004

13

Sodamal

Samasingha Kulihamal

Jhirlapali Pokhrasale

Kolabira

DELINEATED CLUSTER MAP

14 14

IDENTIFICATION AND RANKING OF NON TRIBAL RURBAN CLUSTERS

STEP 1- IDENTIFICATION OF RURBAN CLUSTERS IN THE LEADING SUB DISTRICTS Identification of contiguous villages around the largest village settlement/census town to form rurban

clusters in the leading sub districts.

STEP 2- RANKING OF RURBAN CLUSTERS

Rise in Land Values

Decadal growth in rural population

Decadal increase in non farm work force participation

Performance in Swacch Bharat Mission ( Grameen)

% Enrollment of girls in secondary schools

Good Governance Initiatives by Gram Panchayats

% Households with Bank accounts under Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana

Any other factor which the States may consider relevant may also be included. However, a total weightage of 80% would be given for the first 4 parameters and the States will have the flexibility to choose the last three parameters, subject to a total of 20%.

STEPS BY STATES

80%

20%

CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY-contd…..

15 15

For ranking of Tribal Clusters, the parameters adopted at the Sub District and

Cluster level would be different from that adopted for the Non Tribal Clusters:

Selection of Top Tribal Sub Districts by MoRD

Decadal Growth in Tribal Population 25% weightage

Decadal Growth in Non Farm Work Participation Ratio

15% weightage

Presence of Economic Clusters in the district 15 % weightage

Tribal Literacy Rate 20% weightage

Decadal Growth in Rural Population 25 % weightage

IDENTIFICATION OF TRIBAL RURBAN SUB DISTRICTS IN A STATE

STEPS BY MoRD

CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY

MADHYA PRADESH TOP SUB DISTRICTS (Tribal)

Seoni

Bichhiya

Dhar

Shahpura

Gandhwani Tamia

Deosar

Petlawad

Pushparajgarh

Shahpur

4

10

1

5

13

11

9

3

12

2

Barghat 14

Meghnagar 8

Jaitpur 16

Chitrangi 17

Sailana 19

Newali 18

Balaghat 20 Pandhana 6

Alirajpur 7 Barwaha 15

MADHYA

PRADESH

Alirajpur BLOCK CLUSTER, Alirajpur DISTRICT Madhya Pradesh POPULATION: 15639

Indersing Ki Choki

Akola

5 KM

Kharkhari

Band

Bilwat

Ramsing ki choki Bahdiya

ki choki

Chichalguda

Dipa ki choki

Alirajpur

5 KM

Block Headquarter

Largest Village (as per Population 2011)

Identified Villages

LEGEND

18 18

IDENTIFICATION OF TRIBAL RURBAN CLUSTERS IN A STATE

Selection of Tribal Clusters by State Government

Decadal Growth in Tribal Population 35% weightage

Decadal Growth in Non Farm Work Participation Ratio -30% weightage

Growth in Tribal Literacy Rate 35% weightage

MoRD selected the leading Tribal Sub Districts in a State, within which States

chose and ranked the Tribal Clusters as per suggested methodology:

Any other factor which the States may consider relevant were also included in addition to the above three parameters, provided the weightage for the above three parameters is not reduced below 80%.

STEPS BY STATES

CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY-contd…..

CLUSTERS AS PLANNING AREAS

21

Cluster Overview

No. of Gram Panchayats in cluster 07

Population of the cluster (HH survey, 2016) 54214

Decadal growth in population (2001 – 2011) 28.5%

Name of Block Head Quarters Bahadrabad

Name of the BDO Ms. Anita Panwar

Bhagtanpur Abidpur cluster

The Bhagtanpur Abidpur cluster region is under the master plan of Haridwar. It is located within the administrative boundary of Bahadrabad block. The declared cluster is situated geographically between the towns of Haridwar and Roorkee, access to which is via the National Highway 58 and the Bahadrabad bypass.

Digitalization of GP boundaries and Landuse mapping

23

Bhagtanpur Abidpur cluster GP: Atmalpur Bangla

Rurban Cluster Overview - Odisha

24

SAMASINGHA BANPUR TALA BASTA Planning

Notification Status

PLANNING NOTIFICATION COMPLETED BY HUD ODISHA

THAKURMUNDA UTKELA

HOW ARE THESE RURBAN CLUSTERS BEING DEVELOPED AND

FUNDED?

25

DESIRABLE COMPONENTS FOR A RURBAN CLUSTER

Skill Development

training Linked to Economic

Activities

HOUSEHOLD LEVEL All Households within the cluster

24x7 Piped Water Supply

Individual Toilets

VILLAGE LEVEL

Village Streets with Drains & Street Lights

Solid Waste Management

LPG Gas Connections/

Smokeless choolhas

26

Solid Waste Treatment/

Vermi composting for Organic Farming

CLUSTER LEVEL

Fully equipped Mobile Health Unit

Up gradation of primary, secondary and higher

secondary schools

Inter village roads /connectivity to the

nearest urban centre with public transport.

Full Digital Literacy

& E- Gram Centre

Dairy Farming Organic Farming

Agro Processing/Agri Services

27

DESIRABLE COMPONENTS FOR A RURBAN CLUSTER

INTEGRATED CLUSTER ACTION PLAN ( ICAP)

28

Integrated Cluster Action Plan (ICAP) shall be a key document covering baseline studies

outlining the requirements of the cluster and the key interventions needed to address

these needs and to leverage its potential.

ICAP

Strategy for the cluster integrating the vision for each Gram Sabha, identified in the cluster

Desired outcomes for the cluster under the Rurban Mission

Resources to be mobilized for the cluster

Critical Gap Funding (CGF) required for the cluster

Detailed Spatial Plan for the entire cluster to be duly notified and integrated with the Master Plans or District Plans as the case may be

RURBAN MISSION FUNDING PATTERN & METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT

FIs

70%

CSR

PSP

30%

Critical Gap Fund

NRuM

Convergence

•Upgradation of Schools

•Health facilities

•Full Digital Literacy

•E Gram Centre

•24*7 Piped Water Supply

•Individual Toilets

•Solid Waste Management

•Inter village road connectivity

•LPG Gas connections

• Skill Development

• Agro Processing

• Agri Service Economic Activities

Basic Amenities

Social Amenities

Digital Amenities

Integrated Cluster Action Plan (ICAP) shall be a key document covering baseline studies outlining the

requirements of the cluster and the key interventions needed to address these needs and to

leverage its potential.

30

Punjab

J & K Haryana

STATE LEVEL WORKSHOPS ON ICAPs- APRIL-JUNE 2016

Uttar Pradesh

31

STATE LEVEL WORKSHOPS ON ICAPs- APRIL-JUNE 2016

Kerala

Andhra Pradesh Tamil Nadu

32

STATE LEVEL WORKSHOPS ON ICAPs- SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2016

Himachal Pradesh Madhya Pradesh

Leh

Kerala

Jammu & Kashmir.

Rajasthan

Gujarat

Madhya Pradesh

Uttar Pradesh

Maharashtra

Telangana

Andhra

Pradesh

Chattisgarh

Bihar

Jharkhand

West

Bengal

Sikkim

Assam

Arunachal Pradesh

Meghalaya

Tripura

Karnataka

Tamilnadu

Odisha

Mizoram

Manipur

Nagaland

Punjab

Himachal Pradesh

Haryana

Uttarakhand

S.No

State Name NT T

1 HARYANA 0 6

2 HIMACHAL PRADESH

0 2

3 JAMMU & KASHMIR

0 2

4 PUNJAB 0 2

5 UTTARAKHAND

0 2

6 MADHYA PRADESH

2 5

7 GOA 0 1

8 GUJARAT 2 2

9 MAHARASHTRA

1 6

10 RAJASTHAN 1 4

11 BIHAR 0 4

12 CHHATTISGARH

2 2

13 JHARKHAND 1 2

14 ODISHA 2 3

15 WEST BENGAL 1 6

16 ANDHRA PRADESH

1 4

17 KARNATAKA 1 2

18 KERALA 0 4

19 TAMIL NADU 0 5

20 TELANGANA 1 3

21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH

1 0

22 MANIPUR 0 1

23 MEGHALAYA 1 0

24 MIZORAM 0 1

25 NAGALAND 0 1

26 SIKKIM 0 1

27 TRIPURA 0 2

28 Uttar Pradesh 0 8

98 ICAP’s - 28 States approved in Phase-2

WHAT ARE THE TYPES OF INTERVENTIONS AND

INVESTMENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE 98 ICAPs ?

34

Digital Amenities

Economic Activities

Social Amenities

Basic Amenities

Th

em

atic

Need

Principle of Saturation of Categories

Phasing of Investment – Phase 1 Clusters

61.88

19.58 19.92

2.66 14.56

5.67 6.53 1.44

47.32

13.92 13.39 1.22

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

Basic Amenities Social Amenities Economic Amenities Digital Amenities

Rs In Billions

Agriculture, 1263.2648, 12%

Drinking Water, 1688.211, 16%

Education, 480.329, 5%

Infrastructure, 940.45, 9% Lighting and

electricity, 337.2935, 3%

Link Roads, 1261.29, 12%

Medical & Health, 348.46, 3%

Sanitation, 640.2192, 6%

Skill Develolpment , 580.4166, 6%

Solid and liquid waste

management, 498.75, 5%

Village Street with Drains , 1569.43,

15%

CGF Convergence Total Investment

Agriculture, 344.3, 12%

Drinking Water, 436.6, 16%

Education, 194.1, 7%

Infrastructure, 225.5, 8% Lighting and

electricity, 171.7, 6% Link Roads, 152.9, 5%

Medical & Health, 107.6, 4%

Sanitation, 102.1, 4%

Skill Develolpment , 214.7, 8%

SLWM 205.3

7%

Tourism, 94.0, 3%

Village Street with Drains , 328.1, 12%

Critical Gap Funding

Agriculture, 918.95, 12%

Drinking Water, 1251.59, 16%

Education, 286.23, 4%

Infrastructure, 714.93, 9%

Lighting and electricity, 165.58,

2%

Link Roads, 1108.4, 15%

Medical & Health, 240.9, 3%

Sanitation, 538.14, 7%

Skill Develolpment , 365.70, 5%

SLWM 293.41

4%

Village Street with Drains , 1241.38, 16%

Convergence

315.88

158.13 156.96

7.69

234.93

106.26 123.22

3.39

80.9 51.87 33.79

4.3 0

100

200

300

400

BASIC AMENITIES ECONOMIC AMENITIES SOCIAL AMENITIES DIGITAL AMENITIES

Total

Rs in Crores

Phasing of Investment - Second Phase Clusters

Agri services and

Processing, 40.01, 25%

CSC 3.66 2%

Drinking Water, 20.22,

12%

Education, 10.46, 6% Health &

Nutrition, 5.89, 4%

Skill development,

9.49, 6%

Social Infrastructure

&Housing, 12.35, 8%

Solid and liquid waste

management, 2.58, 2%

Street lights & electricity, 17.64, 11%

Village road connectivity,

8.99, 6%

village street with drains,

19.64, 12%

Agri services and

Processing, 79.74, 21%

Drinking Water, 31.39,

8%

Education, 7.27, 2%

Sanitation, 29.48, 8%

Skill development,

23.38, 6%

Social Infrastructure

&Housing, 110.3, 29%

Solid and liquid waste

management, 7.1, 2%

Street lights & electricity,

7.33, 2%

Village road connectivity,

67.82, 18%

village street with drains,

7.33, 2%

Critical Gap Funding Convergence

MISSION OUTCOMES

SDGs

RURBAN ON THE GROUND

40

MISSION STATUS AND OUTCOMES

41

TOTAL INVESTMENT

The total investment estimated over the next 3 years, in these plans for 98

clusters is INR 101.38 billion and the Critical Gap Funding approved is INR

28.20 billion. INR 75.85 billion is proposed to be mobilised through various

State Government and Central Government schemes.

MISSION OUTCOMES

INR 300.00 billion of Investment in 300 clusters across the country, 90.00

billion INR of Central Government Grant as Critical Gap Funding, More than

3000 GPs benefitted and saturated with Basic, social economic and digital

amenities.

At the end of the Mission period the country will have 300 Rurban clusters

which will be ODF, green, agro based and thematic clusters with skilled

manpower and access to economic opportunities.

MISSION OUTCOMES AND THE SDGs

42

43

Glimpses of Work on ground Andhra Pradesh

Odisha

Chattisgarh

Rs 1500 crores worth of work ongoing in 98 clusters

Himachal Pradesh

www.rurban.gov.in