URBAN RURAL DIVIDE - 4th Smart Cities India 2018 … OF INDIA CONTINUES TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS...
Transcript of URBAN RURAL DIVIDE - 4th Smart Cities India 2018 … OF INDIA CONTINUES TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS...
68% OF INDIA CONTINUES TO LIVE IN RURAL AREAS
AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SERVICE, CONTRIBUTION TO GDP REDUCED FROM 52% IN 1950 TO 14% IN 2013 WHILE 50% OF THE OVERALL LABOUR FORCE IS STILL DEPENDANT ON AGRICULTURE, THIS SITUATION IS DEFINITELY NOT SUSTAINABLE.
26% OF RURAL INDIA IS POOR COMPARED TO 14% IN URBAN AREAS.
RURAL LITERACY RATE MUCH LOWER THAN URBAN LITERACY RATE
EDUCATION - RATE OF FALL OF NET ATTENDANCE FROM PRIMARY TO SECONDARY IS MUCH STEEPER IN THE RURAL AREAS.
HEALTH INDICATORS- RURAL INDIA LAGS BEHIND URBAN INDIA IN ALL THE INDICATORS- INFANT MORTALITY RATE, % OF ANEMIC POPULATION & ACCESS TO BASIC SERVICES.
URBAN RURAL DIVIDE SOME GLARING STATISTICS
NATIONAL RURBAN MISSION
NRuM
3
MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
“Development of a cluster of villages that preserve and nurture the essence of rural community life with focus on equity and inclusiveness without
compromising with the facilities perceived to be essentially urban in nature, thus creating a cluster of “ Rurban Villages”.
RURBAN CONTEXT & NRuM
5
Rural Areas typically thrive in clusters with potential for growth, economic drivers and locational and competitive advantages.
Hence, making a case for concerted policy directives for such clusters. These clusters once developed can then be classified as ‘Rurban’.
Taking into account the advantages of development of clusters of rural areas, the National Rurban Mission was conceptualized .
Approved by the Union Cabinet on 16th September, 2015 and launched by the Honorable Prime Minister on 21st February, 2016.
RURBAN CLUSTERS- KEY FEATURES
8
Rurban clusters, would be a cluster of geographically contiguous villages
with a population of about 25000 to 50000 in plain and coastal areas and a
population of 5000 to 15000 in desert, hilly or tribal areas.
The cluster selection is based on a scientific method based on various
parameters of growth. This involved an objective analysis at the District, Sub
District and Village level, of the demography, economy, tourism & pilgrimage
significance and transportation corridor impact, also leveraging on the land
prices and the increase in non -farm work participation.
9 9
STEP 1- SEPARATION OF NON TRIBAL AND TRIBAL DISTRICTS Identification of Top 100 Tribal Districts in the Country from Census 2011 and separation of Non Tribal and
Tribal Districts in a State
IDENTIFICATION OF NON TRIBAL RURBAN SUB DISTRICTS IN A STATE
STEP 2- IDENTIFICATION OF TOP 50 SUB DISTRICTS FROM THE NON TRIBAL DISTRICTS IN A STATE Based on Decadal Increase in Rural Population
STEP 3- RANKING OF TOP 50 SUBDISTRICTS TO IDENTIFY THE LEADING SUB DISTRICTS IN A STATE
STEPS BY MoRD
Decadal Growth in Rural Population- 35% weightage
Decadal Growth in Non Farm Work Participation Ratio -35% weightage
Presence of Economic Clusters in the district-10% weightage
Tourism & Pilgrimage Significance of the district- 10% weightage
Proximity to Transport Corridors- 10% weightage
CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY
Poonamallee
Sriperumbudur
Chengalpattu
Thanjavur
Madurai North
Tirunelveli
Madurai South
Palayamkottai
Coimbatore North
Tiruppur
Karnataka
TAMIL NADU TOP NON-TRIBAL SUB DISTRICTS
2
6
9
1
10
7
3
11
4
8 Avanashi 5
Thiruvallur 12
Karaikkudi 13
Sivaganga
Coimbatore South 14
Ponneri 15
Kalkulam
Ambattur 17
Theni 19
Hosur 20
18
16
ODISHA TOP SUB DISTRICTS (Non-Tribal)
11
ODISHA
Jajapur Road
Khalikote Sadar
Bhrampur
Baidyeswar Banki 1
Kanpur
5
Burden Kolabira
2
3
Banapur 4
Serango 6
Golanthara 7
8
9
Adva
12
Belpahar 13 Jaleswar
Gaisilet
Tangi 16
Paikamal
18
15
Mohana
10
11
19
Ulunda 20
DISTRICT- CHITRAKOOT, BLOCK CLUSTER MAU MUSTKIL UTTAR PRADESH, POPULATION: 47813
Bambura
Konpa
Dhawada Mau Mustkil
LEGEND
Block Headquarter
Largest Village (as per Population 2011)
Identified Villages
Ahiri
Suraundha
Dhaddhwar Rataura
Mawai Kalan Mustkil
Mandaur
Sikraun
Dubari
Identified Villages
SAMASINGHA CLUSTER, KOLABIRA BLOCK, JHARSUGUDA DISTRICT, ODISHA; POPULATION:31004
13
Sodamal
Samasingha Kulihamal
Jhirlapali Pokhrasale
Kolabira
DELINEATED CLUSTER MAP
14 14
IDENTIFICATION AND RANKING OF NON TRIBAL RURBAN CLUSTERS
STEP 1- IDENTIFICATION OF RURBAN CLUSTERS IN THE LEADING SUB DISTRICTS Identification of contiguous villages around the largest village settlement/census town to form rurban
clusters in the leading sub districts.
STEP 2- RANKING OF RURBAN CLUSTERS
Rise in Land Values
Decadal growth in rural population
Decadal increase in non farm work force participation
Performance in Swacch Bharat Mission ( Grameen)
% Enrollment of girls in secondary schools
Good Governance Initiatives by Gram Panchayats
% Households with Bank accounts under Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana
Any other factor which the States may consider relevant may also be included. However, a total weightage of 80% would be given for the first 4 parameters and the States will have the flexibility to choose the last three parameters, subject to a total of 20%.
STEPS BY STATES
80%
20%
CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY-contd…..
15 15
For ranking of Tribal Clusters, the parameters adopted at the Sub District and
Cluster level would be different from that adopted for the Non Tribal Clusters:
Selection of Top Tribal Sub Districts by MoRD
Decadal Growth in Tribal Population 25% weightage
Decadal Growth in Non Farm Work Participation Ratio
15% weightage
Presence of Economic Clusters in the district 15 % weightage
Tribal Literacy Rate 20% weightage
Decadal Growth in Rural Population 25 % weightage
IDENTIFICATION OF TRIBAL RURBAN SUB DISTRICTS IN A STATE
STEPS BY MoRD
CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY
MADHYA PRADESH TOP SUB DISTRICTS (Tribal)
Seoni
Bichhiya
Dhar
Shahpura
Gandhwani Tamia
Deosar
Petlawad
Pushparajgarh
Shahpur
4
10
1
5
13
11
9
3
12
2
Barghat 14
Meghnagar 8
Jaitpur 16
Chitrangi 17
Sailana 19
Newali 18
Balaghat 20 Pandhana 6
Alirajpur 7 Barwaha 15
MADHYA
PRADESH
Alirajpur BLOCK CLUSTER, Alirajpur DISTRICT Madhya Pradesh POPULATION: 15639
Indersing Ki Choki
Akola
5 KM
Kharkhari
Band
Bilwat
Ramsing ki choki Bahdiya
ki choki
Chichalguda
Dipa ki choki
Alirajpur
5 KM
Block Headquarter
Largest Village (as per Population 2011)
Identified Villages
LEGEND
18 18
IDENTIFICATION OF TRIBAL RURBAN CLUSTERS IN A STATE
Selection of Tribal Clusters by State Government
Decadal Growth in Tribal Population 35% weightage
Decadal Growth in Non Farm Work Participation Ratio -30% weightage
Growth in Tribal Literacy Rate 35% weightage
MoRD selected the leading Tribal Sub Districts in a State, within which States
chose and ranked the Tribal Clusters as per suggested methodology:
Any other factor which the States may consider relevant were also included in addition to the above three parameters, provided the weightage for the above three parameters is not reduced below 80%.
STEPS BY STATES
CLUSTER SELECTION METHODOLOGY-contd…..
Cluster Overview
No. of Gram Panchayats in cluster 07
Population of the cluster (HH survey, 2016) 54214
Decadal growth in population (2001 – 2011) 28.5%
Name of Block Head Quarters Bahadrabad
Name of the BDO Ms. Anita Panwar
Bhagtanpur Abidpur cluster
The Bhagtanpur Abidpur cluster region is under the master plan of Haridwar. It is located within the administrative boundary of Bahadrabad block. The declared cluster is situated geographically between the towns of Haridwar and Roorkee, access to which is via the National Highway 58 and the Bahadrabad bypass.
Digitalization of GP boundaries and Landuse mapping
23
Bhagtanpur Abidpur cluster GP: Atmalpur Bangla
Rurban Cluster Overview - Odisha
24
SAMASINGHA BANPUR TALA BASTA Planning
Notification Status
PLANNING NOTIFICATION COMPLETED BY HUD ODISHA
THAKURMUNDA UTKELA
DESIRABLE COMPONENTS FOR A RURBAN CLUSTER
Skill Development
training Linked to Economic
Activities
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL All Households within the cluster
24x7 Piped Water Supply
Individual Toilets
VILLAGE LEVEL
Village Streets with Drains & Street Lights
Solid Waste Management
LPG Gas Connections/
Smokeless choolhas
26
Solid Waste Treatment/
Vermi composting for Organic Farming
CLUSTER LEVEL
Fully equipped Mobile Health Unit
Up gradation of primary, secondary and higher
secondary schools
Inter village roads /connectivity to the
nearest urban centre with public transport.
Full Digital Literacy
& E- Gram Centre
Dairy Farming Organic Farming
Agro Processing/Agri Services
27
DESIRABLE COMPONENTS FOR A RURBAN CLUSTER
INTEGRATED CLUSTER ACTION PLAN ( ICAP)
28
Integrated Cluster Action Plan (ICAP) shall be a key document covering baseline studies
outlining the requirements of the cluster and the key interventions needed to address
these needs and to leverage its potential.
ICAP
Strategy for the cluster integrating the vision for each Gram Sabha, identified in the cluster
Desired outcomes for the cluster under the Rurban Mission
Resources to be mobilized for the cluster
Critical Gap Funding (CGF) required for the cluster
Detailed Spatial Plan for the entire cluster to be duly notified and integrated with the Master Plans or District Plans as the case may be
RURBAN MISSION FUNDING PATTERN & METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT
FIs
70%
CSR
PSP
30%
Critical Gap Fund
NRuM
Convergence
•Upgradation of Schools
•Health facilities
•Full Digital Literacy
•E Gram Centre
•24*7 Piped Water Supply
•Individual Toilets
•Solid Waste Management
•Inter village road connectivity
•LPG Gas connections
• Skill Development
• Agro Processing
• Agri Service Economic Activities
Basic Amenities
Social Amenities
Digital Amenities
Integrated Cluster Action Plan (ICAP) shall be a key document covering baseline studies outlining the
requirements of the cluster and the key interventions needed to address these needs and to
leverage its potential.
Kerala
Jammu & Kashmir.
Rajasthan
Gujarat
Madhya Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Maharashtra
Telangana
Andhra
Pradesh
Chattisgarh
Bihar
Jharkhand
West
Bengal
Sikkim
Assam
Arunachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Tripura
Karnataka
Tamilnadu
Odisha
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Punjab
Himachal Pradesh
Haryana
Uttarakhand
S.No
State Name NT T
1 HARYANA 0 6
2 HIMACHAL PRADESH
0 2
3 JAMMU & KASHMIR
0 2
4 PUNJAB 0 2
5 UTTARAKHAND
0 2
6 MADHYA PRADESH
2 5
7 GOA 0 1
8 GUJARAT 2 2
9 MAHARASHTRA
1 6
10 RAJASTHAN 1 4
11 BIHAR 0 4
12 CHHATTISGARH
2 2
13 JHARKHAND 1 2
14 ODISHA 2 3
15 WEST BENGAL 1 6
16 ANDHRA PRADESH
1 4
17 KARNATAKA 1 2
18 KERALA 0 4
19 TAMIL NADU 0 5
20 TELANGANA 1 3
21 ARUNACHAL PRADESH
1 0
22 MANIPUR 0 1
23 MEGHALAYA 1 0
24 MIZORAM 0 1
25 NAGALAND 0 1
26 SIKKIM 0 1
27 TRIPURA 0 2
28 Uttar Pradesh 0 8
98 ICAP’s - 28 States approved in Phase-2
Digital Amenities
Economic Activities
Social Amenities
Basic Amenities
Th
em
atic
Need
Principle of Saturation of Categories
Phasing of Investment – Phase 1 Clusters
61.88
19.58 19.92
2.66 14.56
5.67 6.53 1.44
47.32
13.92 13.39 1.22
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
Basic Amenities Social Amenities Economic Amenities Digital Amenities
Rs In Billions
Agriculture, 1263.2648, 12%
Drinking Water, 1688.211, 16%
Education, 480.329, 5%
Infrastructure, 940.45, 9% Lighting and
electricity, 337.2935, 3%
Link Roads, 1261.29, 12%
Medical & Health, 348.46, 3%
Sanitation, 640.2192, 6%
Skill Develolpment , 580.4166, 6%
Solid and liquid waste
management, 498.75, 5%
Village Street with Drains , 1569.43,
15%
CGF Convergence Total Investment
Agriculture, 344.3, 12%
Drinking Water, 436.6, 16%
Education, 194.1, 7%
Infrastructure, 225.5, 8% Lighting and
electricity, 171.7, 6% Link Roads, 152.9, 5%
Medical & Health, 107.6, 4%
Sanitation, 102.1, 4%
Skill Develolpment , 214.7, 8%
SLWM 205.3
7%
Tourism, 94.0, 3%
Village Street with Drains , 328.1, 12%
Critical Gap Funding
Agriculture, 918.95, 12%
Drinking Water, 1251.59, 16%
Education, 286.23, 4%
Infrastructure, 714.93, 9%
Lighting and electricity, 165.58,
2%
Link Roads, 1108.4, 15%
Medical & Health, 240.9, 3%
Sanitation, 538.14, 7%
Skill Develolpment , 365.70, 5%
SLWM 293.41
4%
Village Street with Drains , 1241.38, 16%
Convergence
315.88
158.13 156.96
7.69
234.93
106.26 123.22
3.39
80.9 51.87 33.79
4.3 0
100
200
300
400
BASIC AMENITIES ECONOMIC AMENITIES SOCIAL AMENITIES DIGITAL AMENITIES
Total
Rs in Crores
Phasing of Investment - Second Phase Clusters
Agri services and
Processing, 40.01, 25%
CSC 3.66 2%
Drinking Water, 20.22,
12%
Education, 10.46, 6% Health &
Nutrition, 5.89, 4%
Skill development,
9.49, 6%
Social Infrastructure
&Housing, 12.35, 8%
Solid and liquid waste
management, 2.58, 2%
Street lights & electricity, 17.64, 11%
Village road connectivity,
8.99, 6%
village street with drains,
19.64, 12%
Agri services and
Processing, 79.74, 21%
Drinking Water, 31.39,
8%
Education, 7.27, 2%
Sanitation, 29.48, 8%
Skill development,
23.38, 6%
Social Infrastructure
&Housing, 110.3, 29%
Solid and liquid waste
management, 7.1, 2%
Street lights & electricity,
7.33, 2%
Village road connectivity,
67.82, 18%
village street with drains,
7.33, 2%
Critical Gap Funding Convergence
MISSION STATUS AND OUTCOMES
41
TOTAL INVESTMENT
The total investment estimated over the next 3 years, in these plans for 98
clusters is INR 101.38 billion and the Critical Gap Funding approved is INR
28.20 billion. INR 75.85 billion is proposed to be mobilised through various
State Government and Central Government schemes.
MISSION OUTCOMES
INR 300.00 billion of Investment in 300 clusters across the country, 90.00
billion INR of Central Government Grant as Critical Gap Funding, More than
3000 GPs benefitted and saturated with Basic, social economic and digital
amenities.
At the end of the Mission period the country will have 300 Rurban clusters
which will be ODF, green, agro based and thematic clusters with skilled
manpower and access to economic opportunities.
43
Glimpses of Work on ground Andhra Pradesh
Odisha
Chattisgarh
Rs 1500 crores worth of work ongoing in 98 clusters
Himachal Pradesh