Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark...

9
Page 1 Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works Code Section 810, the UFC has developed these criteria for evaluating potential landmark trees in San Francisco. When evaluating or considering potential landmark trees, please consider the context of the tree within its site location. For example, a tree on PUC land may not have the same community importance that a street or park tree would. Use comment sections, as appropriate, to explain or support evaluation. Attach sheets if more space is needed. Evaluator’s name: Jon Swae Date of evaluation: 10-9-2018 (10:45am) Scientific name: Aesculus California Common name: California buckeye Street address: 2694 McAllister Street Cross streets: Willard Street North Rarity _X__ Yes ___ Partially ___ No Rarity: __X__Rare ____Uncommon ____Common ____Other Unusual species in San Francisco or other geographic regions. Comment: California buckeyes are a native California species. They don’t appear common in San Francisco. Only 43 buckeye trees were recorded in the Street Tree Census (2017). It is rare for such a large specimen to be found in San Francisco and located in such a prime visible location next to the public right-of-way. Physical Attributes _X__ Yes ___ Partially ___ No Size: __X__Large ____Medium ____Small Notable size compared to other trees of the same species in San Francisco. Comment: This is certainly the largest California Buckeye I have ever seen in either an urban or non- urban location. It is quite magnificent. The Trees of San Francisco book by Mike Sullivan lists the tree as “the largest California buckeye in San Francisco.” Age: __X__Yes ____No Significantly advanced age for the species. Comment: Given the large size of the tree and trunk, it appears significantly advanced in age. The home associated with the tree was built in 1900. The tree was likely planted around then. Distinguished form: __X__Yes ____No

Transcript of Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark...

Page 1: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

Page 1

Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works Code Section 810, the UFC has developed these criteria for evaluating potential landmark trees in San Francisco. When evaluating or considering potential landmark trees, please consider the context of the tree within its site location. For example, a tree on PUC land may not have the same community importance that a street or park tree would. Use comment sections, as appropriate, to explain or support evaluation. Attach sheets if more space is needed. Evaluator’s name: Jon Swae

Date of evaluation: 10-9-2018 (10:45am)

Scientific name: Aesculus California

Common name: California buckeye

Street address: 2694 McAllister Street

Cross streets: Willard Street North Rarity _X__ Yes ___ Partially ___ No Rarity: __X__Rare ____Uncommon ____Common ____Other Unusual species in San Francisco or other geographic regions.

Comment: California buckeyes are a native California species. They don’t appear common in San Francisco. Only 43 buckeye trees were recorded in the Street Tree Census (2017). It is rare for such a large specimen to be found in San Francisco and located in such a prime visible location next to the public right-of-way. Physical Attributes _X__ Yes ___ Partially ___ No Size: __X__Large ____Medium ____Small Notable size compared to other trees of the same species in San Francisco. Comment: This is certainly the largest California Buckeye I have ever seen in either an urban or non-urban location. It is quite magnificent. The Trees of San Francisco book by Mike Sullivan lists the tree as “the largest California buckeye in San Francisco.” Age: __X__Yes ____No Significantly advanced age for the species. Comment: Given the large size of the tree and trunk, it appears significantly advanced in age. The home associated with the tree was built in 1900. The tree was likely planted around then. Distinguished form: __X__Yes ____No

Page 2: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria

Page 2

2

Tree is an example of good form for its species, has a majestic quality or otherwise unique structure. Describe: The tree has a very large and unique trunk with many knobby shapes. The tree’s large and high canopy spreads over the property’s front yard and surrounding sidewalks. Photos of the tree in bloom and covered in green leaves reveal a very fine appearing form. Tree condition: __X__Good ____Poor ____Hazard Consider overall tree health and structure, and whether or not tree poses a hazard Describe: The tree appears to be in a good condition for such age. Marks are visible where pruning has occurred in the past. Some moss can be seen growing on limbs. Historical ___ Yes ___ Partially ___ No Historical Association: ____ Yes ____ None apparent Related to a historic or cultural building, site, street, person, event, etc. Describe nature of appreciation: I am not aware of any connection of the tree to historic events, people or structures. Profiled in a publication or other media: __X__Yes ____Unknown Tree has received coverage in print, internet, video media, etc. Attach documentation if appropriate. Describe coverage: The tree is discussed in The Trees of San Francisco by Mike Sullivan an on websites of local native plant organizations. Environmental __X_ Yes ___ Partially ___ No Prominent landscape feature: __X__Yes ____No A striking and outstanding natural feature. Describe, attach photo if possible: The tree has a striking presence and creates a prominent feature on the corner of McAllister and Willard North Streets. It would be difficult to not notice the buckeye. Low tree density: ____Low ____Moderate ____High Tree exists in a neighborhood with very few trees. Describe: _ McAllister and nearby streets appear only partially covered by street trees. The Inner Richmond has an estimated canopy of 9.5%. Interdependent group of trees: _ __Yes __X__No This tree in an integral member of a group of trees and removing it may have an adverse impact on adjacent trees. Describe: A very old and large California Bay tree is located adjacent to the buckeye. It is uncertain how any potential removal would impact this other tree.

Page 3: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria

Page 3

3

Visible or Accessible from public right-of-way: __X__Yes ____No High visibility and/or accessibility from public property.

Describe: The tree cannot be missed. Its prominent location at the corner makes it highly visible to pedestrians, vehicles and nearby homes. High traffic area: ____Yes __X__No Tree is located in an area that has a high volume of vehicle, pedestrian or bike traffic and has a potential traffic calming effect. Describe: Moderate vehicle and pedestrian traffic was visible during time of viewing (~11am). Important wildlife habitat: __X__Yes ____No Species has a known relationship with a particular local wildlife species or it provides food, shelter, or nesting to specific known wildlife individuals. Describe: Birds were visible in the trees branches at the time of visit. Erosion control: ____Yes __X_No Tree prevents soil erosion. Describe: I am unaware of any major erosion control function being performed by the tree. Wind or sound barrier: ____Yes __X__No Tree reduces wind speed or mitigates undesirable noise. Describe: The tree does not appear to provide a significant wind or sound barrier. Cultural ___ Yes _X__ Partially ___ No Neighborhood appreciation: __X__ Yes ____None apparent Multiple indicators such as letters of support, petition, outdoor gatherings, celebrations adjacent or related to tree, etc. Attach documentation: Describe: I believe an easement was put on the property at some point in the past requiring Friends of the Urban Forest to be involved in any decisions by future property owners affecting the tree. This presumably was initiated out of strong interest in the tree. The Urban Forestry Council has also periodically remarked on the tree’s significance in San Francisco. I am not aware of any letters from neighbors in regards to landmark designation. Cultural appreciation: __X__Yes ____None apparent Particular value to certain cultural or ethnic groups in the city. Describe nature of appreciation: The McAllister Street buckeye is celebrated by various local native plant and habitat restoration organizations. The tree is mentioned in documents from the California Native Plant Society’s Yerba Buena Chapter and by the Sutro Stewards Project (see attached documentation).

Page 4: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria

Page 4

4

Planting contributes to neighborhood character: __X__Yes ____No Tree contributes significantly to, or represents, neighborhood aesthetic. Describe contribution: I would say the tree does contribute to the neighborhood’s character. Its unique size, age and form along with its location in the front yard of a 100 year old home creates a very rare focal point in a neighborhood with mostly large apartment buildings. Profiled in a publication or other media: __X__Yes ____Unknown Tree has received coverage in print, internet, video media, etc. Attach documentation if appropriate. Describe coverage: The tree is mentioned in the Trees of San Francisco book and in documents by local environmental organizations. Prominent landscape feature: __X__Yes ____No A striking and outstanding natural feature. Describe, attach photo if possible: Yes, the tree is surely a prominent landscape feature as is discussed throughout this document. While the viewing occurred in the fall, springtime photos show the tree in striking full bloom with many white cone-like flowers blooming. Additional comments

Page 5: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

10/9/2018 California Buckeye (Aesculus californica) - Yerba Buena Chapter – CNPS

http://cnps-yerbabuena.org/california-buckeye-aesculus-californica/ 1/3

Yerba Buena Chapter – CNPS

California Buckeye (Aesculus californica)Posted on January 8, 2017 by Jake Sigg

The California buckeye (Aesculus californica) is common in theBay Area but harsh winds, sandy soils, and other factorsconspired to prevent very many trees from growing in SanFrancisco prior to European contact. A Flora of San Francisco,California, published in 1958, states that Archibald Menzies inthe 1792 Vancouver Expedition records the buckeye on the“skirts of the Bay and hilly Country behind” in the northeasternpart of what is now San Francisco.

The flora reported only one tree extant in the city in 1958 and it is still thriving at the Caltrainstation at 22nd and Pennsylvania Streets. Subsequently we have located a sizable one in abackyard at the base of a cliff at the open space at Palou and Phelps Streets. Other largeones are on the shoreline of Mallard Lake in Golden Gate Park and in a front yard at 2694McAllister Street, corner of Willard.

The trunk of the last-noted one is approximately two feetdiameter just above its swollen base. Knobby excrescencesand fused branches invite visual inspection, one fusingbranch producing a ten-inch-diameter doughnut hole. Someof the limbs are larger than the trunks of most trees you willencounter. An impressively large California bay laurel keepsit close company. But you should see the trees soon-they aregrowing in front of an old empty cottage with an unkemptyard (as is the cottage next door) and they both have “condo” written all over them. It would benice if the landowner were enlightened enough to save them but the world isn’t like that, is it?

BuckeyeAre these cited trees indigenous occurrences? Estimating the age of a buckeye is noteasy. Buckeyes have a moderate growth rate even when growing in fairly dry surroundings.When water is available growth can be rapid, so that a large tree is not necessarily very old.

Home Calendar Gardening Exploring About Contact Volun

Page 6: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

10/9/2018 California Buckeye (Aesculus californica) - Yerba Buena Chapter – CNPS

http://cnps-yerbabuena.org/california-buckeye-aesculus-californica/ 2/3

Buckeyes share with olives the ability to look ancient after only a few decades. In the case ofthe McAllister tree, reasoning tells you that it is not likely that a buckeye grew atop windsweptsand dunes. Lack of water and leaves sensitive to wind would prohibit that. More likely thebuckeye and the bay were planted by the owner after the cottage was built. The Mallard Laketree could be indigenous because it is growing in a depression, out of the wind and where thewater table was probably high enough. However, abundant water is provided by the lake and itcould have been planted within the last five or six decades.

Buckeyes are easy to grow and if you have space in your yard (they will eventually want tospread thirty feet or more) you might want to pick up a seed at our November plant sale. Werecommend seed rather than a plant because a buckeye grows quickly from seed, it will havea better-formed root system, and it will grow faster than if you had started from a plant in acan.

Posted in Gardening with Natives.

Jake Sigg

Subscribe to our mailing list indicates required

Subscribe

*

Email Address *

First Name *

Last Name *

Home Calendar Gardening Exploring About Contact Volun

Page 7: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

10/9/2018 Native Trees: San Francisco’s Long time Residents | Sutro Stewards | Mount Sutro | Volunteer in San Francisco

https://www.sutrostewards.org/single-post/2017/04/24/Native-Trees-San-Francisco%E2%80%99s-Long-time-Residents 1/3

Home About Get Involved Nursery Mount Sutro Blog Donate

Native Trees: San Francisco’s Long timeResidentsApril 24, 2017 Janis Gomes

California is widely known as the home to some of the largest trees in the world. Amongthem is the native California redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) and native giant sequoia(Sequoiadendron giganteum), the latter species boasting the largest single living tree(by volume) in the world. Here in San Francisco, a unique microclimate, windyconditions, and sandy and serpentine soils have precluded the area from having anextensive native tree canopy, let alone producing the aforementioned “big trees” foundin other parts of the state. 

Nevertheless, San Francisco has alwayshad its share of native trees. Long beforethe major tree plantings of the late 1800s,small stands of native oaks, bay laurel,willows, and California buckeye graced thelandscape, near creeks and in canyons,and in the city’s less windy eastern side. Infact, the coast live oak (pictured left) wasamong the most important food sources forthe Ohlone Indians. Acorns, when groundinto meal, provide high protein caloriesyear-round and were important in winterand other times of scarcity. You can alsostill see some of the area’s early oak trees inremnant patches such as the OakWoodlands in Golden Gate Park. In SanFrancisco A Natural History, Garr and Miller(pg. 53) noted, “Arroyo willow thickets linedthe former city creeks, along withoccasional wax myrtles. California Bay treesor laurels were located along Mission Creekin the Mission District. Coffeeberry

(Rhamnus californica) and toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), though classified as shrubs,can grow to the size of a small tree.” While today many of the city’s trees are introduced species that have faired well in ourunique climate, a number of native trees and shrubs continue to enjoy a place in ourlandscape. A few notable ones are highlighted here: California Buckeye (Aesculuscalifornica) or California horse chestnut hasbeen called a tree for all seasons. In earlyspring its bright chartreuse palm-shapedfoliage announces spring long before mostany other tree. Then in spring and summer itputs on a spectacular display of cone-likewhite flower spikes. In fall and winter aftershedding all its leaves and fruit, its silverysmooth bare branches resemble anethereal piece of artwork glowing in themoonlight. Aesculus californica is a member of theSapindaceae (soapberry) family and is theonly buckeye species native to California. Itis distributed widely in the state amongcoastal sage scrub, mixed-evergreen forest,riparian areas (rivers & creeks) and central

Featured Posts

Could the ClarendonTrailhead Stonework beYour Legacy Project?July 5, 2018

Recent Posts

BiodiverseCitySummit at the GlobalClimate ActionSummit - Post EventMessageOctober 5, 2018

CVIA will Match $1,500in Donations!October 2, 2018

Trip Report:September Bird WalkSeptember 11, 2018

Beers Made byWalking Tickets onSale Now!September 11, 2018

Trip Report: AugustBird Walk

August 24, 2018

Search By Tags10th anniversary BMBW Bay Area

Bay Area Ridge Trail

Beers Made by Walking

BiodiverseCity Summit CNPS

CVIA

California Academy of Sciences

California Scrub-Jay

Chlorogalum pomeridianum

Clarendon Clarendon Trailhead

Cole Valley ImprovementAssociation

Community Challenge Grant DEIR

District 7 EIR Executive Director

Page 8: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

10/9/2018 Native Trees: San Francisco’s Long time Residents | Sutro Stewards | Mount Sutro | Volunteer in San Francisco

https://www.sutrostewards.org/single-post/2017/04/24/Native-Trees-San-Francisco%E2%80%99s-Long-time-Residents 2/3

oak woodland. It is a large shrub or treegrowing from 13-40 feet tall and is typically multi-trunked. The California buckeye’scrown is as broad as it is high. Young leaves are chartreuse green, turning darker greenas it matures and has five to seven palmate (shaped like an open palm or like a handwith the fingers extended) leaflets. It has leathery pear-like seed pods and shiny brownseeds that look like chestnuts. But don’t roast them since they are known to beunpleasant tasting and are toxic. Birds and Bees: The sweetly fragrant flowers of this tree provide a rich pollen andnectar source for native bees, hummingbirds, and many species of butterflies.However, Aesculus californica pollen is known to be hazardous to honey bees, none ofwhich are native to California. It is advised not to plant them near to apiaries. Local native American tribes, including the Pomo, Yokut, and Luiseño, crushed thepoisonous nuts to stupefy schools of fish in small streams to make them easier to catch.Buckeye also makes a good fireboard for a bow drill to make fire with. 

In the garden, California buckeye is drought tolerant.However, it will go deciduous early (summer) if dry,hence, it may look better with some watering. In coolcoastal climates, leaves may hold through early fall.Aesculus californica tolerates clay, serpentine, andseasonal flooding. It is also great for a butterfly garden. Itworks well with other natives such as Buckwheat(Eriogonum sp.), Coffeeberry (Frangula californica), StickyMonkeyflower (Mimulusaurantiacus), Chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), Oak(Quercus sp.), Redberry (Rhamnus crocea), Currant

(Ribes sp.), Hummingbird Sage (Salvia spathacea), Blue-eyed Grass (Sisyrinchiumbellum), and many others, as well as numerous annual wildflowers. You can see California buckeye in a number of places in the city, including atop Mt.Sutro in Rotary Meadow. One of the more prominent specimens can be seen on thecorner of Willard North and McAllister Street near the University of San Francisco.McA  Hollyleaf cherry (Prunus ilicifollia)is also known as Islais Cherry. Islais Creek,in San Francisco’s Glen Canyon south ofTwin Peaks, is named for the hollyleafcherry that reportedly grew along thisriparian habitat. It is an evergreen shrub tosmall tree that is native tothe chaparral areas ofcoastal California (from MendocinoCounty to San Diego County), BajaCalifornia, and Baja California Sur, as wellas the desert chaparral areas of the Mojavedesert. It is a member of the rose family,Rosaceae, and grows 8-30 feet tall withshiny, spiny-toothed leaves. Its fruits aresweet edible cherries, although they containlittle flesh. Its small white flowers areproduced on racemes (a flower cluster withthe separate flowers attached by shortequal stalks at equal distances along acentral stem) in the spring. Birds and Bees: Hollyleaf cherry is an excellent tree for encouraging wildlife into thegarden. The flowers attract bees. The fruits are relished by many bird species and theseeds are consumed by small mammals. These birds and animals also help to dispersethe seeds away from the parent plant. In addition, many bird and animal species usethe plants for cover as well as nesting places. Native American uses: Central and southern California tribes prized hollyleaf cherrynot so much for its minimal fleshy fruit, but for its seed kernel or pit, which had to besubjected to a lengthy cooking process to remove the poisonous hydrocyanic acid itcontained. The flour made from the processed pits was said to taste like beans orchestnuts. The Diegueño and the Cahuilla are among the tribes that treated colds andcoughs with infusions made from hollyleaf cherry bark and roots. In the garden hollyleaf cherry is easy to care for, has a low water requirement, andtolerates a variety of soil. It can tolerate temperatures down to 15° F. It works well withnative trees and brush such as Coyotebrush (Baccharis pilularis), Barberry (Berberis

Fall Plant Sale

Franciscan wallflower

Global Climate Action Summit

Golden Gate Audubon Society

Historic Trail Mount Sutro

Mount Sutro Open Space Reserve

Mr. Sutro Mt. Sutro

National Trails Day Normal Yee

North Ridge Trail Northern Flicker

Pacific wren Programs Assistant

REI SF Beer Week

SF Urban Riders San Francisco

Stewardship Assistant

Supervisor Yee

Sutro Bird Watcher Sutro Forest

Sutro Native Plant Nursery

Sutro Reserve Sutro Stewards

Technical Advisory Committee

Twin Peaks

UCSF Mount Sutro Open SpaceReserve

Wilson's Warbler aguilegia

aguilegia formosa animals

anniversary assistant audubon

backyard beer bees beginning

best city hike bike bell biking

bioblitz biodiversity bird

bird walk bird watching birding

birds black phoebe

blue-eyed grass brewers

brewery buckeye building

butterflies california native plants

children chutney citizen science

clarkia climate

clinopodium douglasii columbine

community

community engagement

conservation coservation

cow parsnip craft beer

crew leader crew leader profile

crew leaders crosswalk cuttings

cycling donate drought tolerant

dune habitat dunes ecology

edible plants education

environment fall events family

family nature hike

farewell to spring fauna festival

flora flora and fauna flowers

flycatcher founding memebers

fringecup fundraiser gardening

grant grindelia guided hike

guided tour gum plant habitat

habitat restoration hawk

heracleum heteromeles hike

hike report hikers hiking hiring

history hollyleaf cherry

horticulture hummingbirds

intern intern profile internship

jobs junco kids

management plan manroot

mapping marah masonry

mount sutro multi-use

native plant society native plants

Page 9: Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and ... · Urban Forestry Council Landmark Tree Evaluation Form and Criteria . Pursuant to Ordinance 0017-06 and Public Works

10/9/2018 Native Trees: San Francisco’s Long time Residents | Sutro Stewards | Mount Sutro | Volunteer in San Francisco

https://www.sutrostewards.org/single-post/2017/04/24/Native-Trees-San-Francisco%E2%80%99s-Long-time-Residents 3/3

sp.), Ceanothus sp., Redbud (Cercis occidentalis),Toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), Pines (Pinus sp.), Oak(Quercus sp.), Flannelbush (Fremontodendron sp.),Currant (Ribes sp.), and many others. It is deer resistant,and can be used as a hedge or for bank stabilization.  Come Visit Us!The Sutro Stewards Native Plant Nursery is a great placeto learn about native plants. To learn more about the

nursery and our Wednesday volunteer opportunities, see our Nursery page. To learnabout Sutro Stewards’ other activities and volunteer efforts see our Events calendar.    References 

1. Sequoiadendron giganteum. Wikipedia. March 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoiadendron_giganteum2. San Francisco Urban Forest Plan. Final Fall 2014., http://default.sfplanning.org/plans-and-programs/planning-for-

the-city/urban-forest-plan/Urban_Forest_Plan_Final-092314WEB.pdf3. Holloran, Pete, Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolica). Historical Essay. Shaping San Francisco’s Digital

Archive@FoundSF. FoundSF.org. http://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=Coast_Live_Oaks_(Quercus_agrifolia)4. Garr G. and Miller R. San Francisco A Natural History. Arcadia Publishing. 2006.5. Raiche, R. California Buckeye: A Tree for All Seasons. Pacific Horticulture. Jan. 2009.

http://www.pacifichorticulture.org/articles/california-buckeye-a-tree-for-all-seasons/ 6. California Buckeye. Aesculus californica. California Native Plant Society. http://calscape.org/Aesculus-

californica-()7. Ridgeway, S. Aesculus californicus. California Buckeye. Univ. of California UC Master Gardener Program.

http://sonomamg.ucanr.edu/Plant_of_the_Month/Aesculus_californica_-_California_buckeye/8. Rose, Evelyn. A-Foresting We Will Go. A History of Trees in San Francisco. Part I. Blog Post. August 2013.

http://www.trampsofsanfrancisco.com/a-foresting-we-will-go-a-history-of-trees-in-san-francisco/9. Prunus Ilicifolia. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prunus_ilicifolia

10. Hollyleaf Cherry. Prunus Ilicifolia. California Native Plant Society. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prunus_ilicifolia11. Anderson, M. Kat. Tending the Wild. Native American Knowledge and the Management of California’s Natural

Resources. Univ. of California Press. 200512. Hollyleaf Cherry. Prunus Ilicifolia. USDA NRCS Plant Guide. https://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/cs_pril.pdf

Tags: plant profile native trees oak hollyleaf cherry buckeye california native plantsmount sutro sutro stewards

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

native trees nature nursery

nursery intern nursery tour oak

open house participatory budget

party pedestrian safety

pink flowering currant

place-based plant care

plant hike plant identification

plant profile plant propagation

plant sale planting plants

pollinators profile propagation

rain garden rainwater catchment

realignment recipe recognitions

recreation red-shouldered hawk

route run runoff safety sandy

seeds silk tassel soaproot

spring steller's jay stewardship

sticky monkey flower stonework

stormwater student interns

summit sutro stewards tapping

tellima tours toyon trail bell

trail building trail running

trail system trailhead trails

training trip report

urban biodiversity volunteer

volunteer appreciation party

volunteer spotlight walkers

walking wallflower water

weeding wild onion

wildflower walk wildflowers

wildlife wlaking woodpecker

yerba buena

Follow Us

Sutro Stewards is a project of the San Francisco Parks Alliance, a 501(c)3 California nonprofit public benefit corporation.

© 2018 Sutro Stewards