URANIUM MINING AND ACTIVITIES, PAST AND PRESENTUpdate for the Arizona Game and Fish Department and

Commission

May 2007

1. Background and History of Uranium Mining 22. Geology – Uranium Deposit Types 53. Uranium Mining Techniques, Methods, and Hazards 74. Current/Future Activities in Arizona 135. Human and Environmental Impacts 176. Mining Regulations 187. How the Department Can be Involved 198. Resources Cited 20

Uranium MiningApril 20072

1. Background and History of Uranium Mining

The exploration and mining of radioactive ores in the United States began around the turn of the20th century. At this time, uranium was considered a waste product of radium and vanadiummining. Development of nuclear weaponry during the Cold War increased demand and by 1955there were approximately 800 uranium mines producing high-trade ore on the Colorado Plateau(see Fig. 1). The industry flourished until 1970 when the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)stopped buying uranium due to ample reserve supplies. Foreign competition, federal regulations,nuclear fears, and AEC’s plentiful reserves led to the cessation of domestic uranium mining inthe mid-late 1980’s.

Uranium Mining in Arizona – Historic Activities

Navajo NationIn the 1940's and 1950's, uranium was discovered on the Navajo Reservation. Navajo men fromthe local community mined uranium ore for the U.S. atomic weapons program. When miningceased in the late 1970's, operators abandoned mines without sealing tunnel openings, fillinggaping pits, or removing piles of radioactive uranium ore and mine waste. As a result, Navajominers and local communities were exposed to high levels of radioactivity. A 1959 report foundradiation levels 90 times acceptable limits. Of the 150 Navajo miners who worked until 1970 atthe uranium mine in Shiprock, New Mexico, 133 died of lung cancer or various forms of fibrosiswithin10 years.

Figure 1. U.S. Locations of Mines with Uranium (EPA Draft Database)

Uranium MiningApril 20073

Even after mining activities ceased on the Navajo Nation, the legacy of environmental harmcontinued. The largest accidental release of radioactive material in U.S. history occurred in 1979when the Church Rock tailings dam burst, sending 1,100 tons of radioactive mill waste and 90million gallons of contaminated liquid pouring down the Rio Puerco River toward Arizona. Thiswater source remains tainted today even while a proposed new uranium solution mining projectthreatens the drinking water of 10,000 - 15,000 people living in the Eastern Navajo Agency innorthwestern New Mexico.

The Navajo Nation has banned further uranium mining on their lands.

Arizona Strip (Fig. 2 and Table 1)Uranium was discovered on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in Hack canyon in 1945.Total production from this area was 2.7 million pounds in the 1950’s and by the mid-late 1980’s,three small mines were reported to be producing approximately 10 million pounds. All thesemines have since been reclaimed.

Energy Fuels, Inc worked two additional ore bodies, discovered west of Hack canyon on theArizona Strip, into the 1980’s.

The Pigeon Mine operated from 1984-1991 near the north rim of Snake Gulch, a tributary toKanab Canyon. This mine has been reclaimed.

The Hermit Mine operated from 1989-1992 farther west on the Kanab Plateau. This mine hasbeen reclaimed.

South of the Hermit Mine on the Kanab Plateau, the Pinenut Mine was first drilled in 1985 withactive mining starting in 1988. This mine is on “standby”.

The Arizona 1 Mine, also on the Kanab Plateau, was drilled in 1986, but was not developed until1988. This mine is on “standby” and may soon be reopened (see Section 4).

The Kanab North Mine, located about the same time as the Pigeon Mine in late 1980, is on thewest wall of Kanab Canyon. Exploratory drilling in 1981 revealed uranium ore, and miningbegan in late 1987. The mine was closed in 1991 when uranium prices dropped. This mine isalso on “standby”.

During this time, many mining companies proposed to upgrade and/or pave roads associatedwith mining activities throughout the Arizona Strip. The Arizona Game and Fish Departmentopposed these upgrades, concerned with impacts to wildlife species. When uranium costsplummeted, however, road work planning did not move forward. It is likely these types of roadimprovement proposals will be revisited now that uranium costs have increased and there isrenewed interest in mining on the Arizona Strip.

Uranium MiningApril 20074

Uranium MiningApril 20075

2. Geology - Uranium Deposit Types

Breccia PipesIn Arizona, uranium is deposited within a variety of geologic formations including breccia pipes,tabular sandstone, mudstone, and volcanogenic siltstone. Breccia pipes constitute a majority ofuranium deposits on the Arizona Strip; however, sandstone deposits are also present. Central andsouthern Arizona exhibit mudstone and siltstone. Because most activities relating to recenturanium prospecting occur on the Arizona Strip, our discussion will focus on breccia pipemining.

Breccia pipes are formed when the overlying strata collapses into karstic-limestone solutioncavities in the Redwall Limestone Formation, creating roughly cylindrical, near vertical columnsof broken (brecciated) rock (Fig. 3). Breccia pipes typically range from 100 - 400 feet indiameter and can rise up to 3,000 feet. Uranium mineralization of the breccia columns extendsfrom Toroweap and Kaibab Formation carbonates downward into Supai Group rocks. At or nearthe Toroweap-Coconino contact, ore-associated sulfides dramatically increase in abundance, attimes exceeding 50% total rock volume. Breccia pipes are sometimes associated with sinkholes.

The uranium content of most ore is between only 0.1% and 0.2%. However, the average gradeof Arizona Strip uranium ore has been reported to be 0.65% and 0.80%.

Uranium MiningApril 20076

Figure 3. Breccia Pipe Uranium Mineralization

SandstoneSandstone-type deposits occur in medium to coarse-grained sandstone and are abundant insedimentary rocks of the Colorado Plateau. These deposits form when uranium leached fromsurface rocks by oxidized groundwater flows down into aquifers where it is reduced toprecipitate uraninite, the primary mineral ore of uranium.

3. Uranium Mining Methods, Techniques and Hazards

The U.S. mining industry uses two distinct methods to extract uranium ore: physical removal ofore-bearing rock from the soil prior to processing, or chemical dissolution of uranium fromonsite ore deposits.

Physical removal of rock ore generally involves either open-pit mining or underground mining. Open-pit mining strips away or excavates topsoil and rock that lie above the uranium

ore. Underground mining extracts rock through a tunnel or other opening. Several existing

uranium mines on the Arizona Strip have extracted uranium using this technique.

Waste RockWaste rock may be produced from open pit mining when overburden is removed, or duringunderground mining as tunnels are carved through non-ore zones. Other waste piles consist oflow-grade ore. Distinguishing waste rock from ore depends on the assessment of technical andeconomic feasibilities surrounding further processing.

Piles of waste rock often contain elevated concentrations of radioisotopes and may pose a dangerto humans and the environment due to the release of radon gas and seepage of water containingradioactive and toxic materials.

Figure 4. Nuclear Fuel Production

Uranium MiningApril 20077

Milling the OreOre mined in open pit or underground must be milled to remove uranium. At the mill, ore iscrushed and ground, and treated with chemical leaching agents (sulfuric acid in most cases) todissolve the uranium, which is subsequently recovered from solution. The leaching agent notonly extracts uranium from the ore, but also several other constituents including molybdenum,vanadium, selenium, iron, lead and arsenic. The final mill product, commonly referred to as"yellow cake" (U3O8 with impurities), is packed and shipped in casks.

Tailings, or waste generated from the milling process, are stored in specially designed wastedisposal facilities called impoundments. These wastes are also classified as by-productmaterials.

Closing down a uranium mill produces challenges regarding the safe disposal of large amountsof radioactively contaminated scrap.

Hazards and Characteristics of Mill TailingsProcessing of 0.1% grade ore results in 99.9% of the raw material left behind as sludge. Theamount of sludge produced nearly equals the quantity of ore milled. Because long-lived decayproducts such as thorium-230 and radium-226 are not removed, sludge contains 85% of theinitial ore radioactivity. Furthermore, current extraction limitations cause sludge to retain 5-10% of the uranium initially present in the ore. Sludge also contains other heavy metals andcontaminants, such as arsenic, as well as chemical reagents used during the milling process.

Mining and milling moves hazardous constituents in the ore from relatively safe undergroundlocations and converts them initially into a fine sand and eventually into sludge. During thisprocess, hazardous materials become more susceptible to dispersion in the environment.Moreover, harmful elements within tailings piles yield additional environmental risk. Forexample, in dry areas, salts containing contaminants can migrate to the pile surface where theyare subject to erosion. If the mineral pyrite (FeS2) is present in ore, precipitation and oxygenmay trigger sulfuric acid formation within the deposit and lead to continuous leaching ofcontaminants.

Despite a relatively short half-life of 3.8 days, radon-222* gas presents a longterm hazard.Radon not only emanates directly from tailings piles, but is also continuously produced from thedecay of radium-226 which has a half-life of 1600 years. Further, the parent product of radium-226, thorium-230, is also present and has a half-life of 80,000 years. The lengthy half-lives ofthe radioactive constituents involved means deposit safety must be monitored for very longperiods of time.

* The radium-226 in tailings continuously decays to the radioactive gas radon-222. Radon release from the interior of tailings pilescontinues even after uranium mines are shut down and has been implicated as a cause of lung cancer. The U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) estimates a lifetime excess lung cancer risk of two cases per one hundred residents living near a 80 hectarebare tailings pile..

Since radon is quickly spread by wind (Fig. 5), people living locally can receive additionalradiation doses on an on-going basis. Although the excess risk per individual is small,cumulative effects and the potential to affect large numbers of people raise pressing healthconcerns.

Uranium MiningApril 20078

Figure 5. Tailings Dust – Moab Utah

After about 1 million years, tailings radioactivity and its associated radon emanation will havesufficiently decreased such that carcinogenic effects are limited to the continuous decay ofthorium-230 in residual uranium.

Figure 6. Uranium Mill Tailings Hazards

Tailings deposits are subject to many kinds of erosion (Fig. 6). Following a rainfall, erosiongullies form. Floods can destroy entire deposits and penetration of the deposit by plants andburrowing animals may disperse materials, enhance radon emanation, and make the deposit moresusceptible to climatic erosion. As the surface of the pile dries, fine sands are easily carried bywind to adjacent areas.

Uranium MiningApril 20079

Seepage from tailings piles poses another major hazard due to contamination of ground andsurface water (Fig. 6). Residents face health risks from ingestion of radium-226, arsenic, andother hazardous substances in tainted drinking water and local fish. Pyrite-containing tailings areinherently acidic due to the production of sulfuric acid which increases migration ofcontaminants to the environment.

The situation is similar for tailings deposits in former open pit mines. Here also, seepage orother contact with ground water carries risk. Only the presence of impermeable geologic orman-made layers can prevent ground water contamination.

Chemically dissolving uranium from onsite rock ore is accomplished through either heapleaching or in-situ leaching.

Heap leaching entails pouring chemicals over above-ground piles of crushed ore-bearingrock and collecting uranium through underground drains. This method is not currentlyused in the U.S. (EPA)

In-situ leaching involves chemically treating ore located deep underground. Theresulting liquids are pumped to the surface via wells.

While in-situ leaching is common throughout the U.S., it is rarely employed in Arizona.Currently all existing mining operations on the Arizona Strip involve the physical removal of orefrom open pit or underground mines prior to offsite processing. It is not clear if new miningprospects, either on the Arizona Strip or elsewhere in Arizona will use in-situ leaching or moretraditional techniques.

In-Situ Leaching (Fig. 7)

Figure 7. Illustration of In-Situ Leaching

Where the orebody exists in a saturated sandstone aquifer, drilled boreholes allow for chemicaltreatment of the surrounding water. Uranium is then dissolved and leached from the orebody by

Uranium MiningApril 200710

these circulating chemicals. The resulting solution is pumped through another series ofboreholes for surface recovery of uranium. This method differs somewhat from uraniumconfined to underground non-permeable rock. In these cases, a leaching liquid (e.g., ammoniumcarbonate or sulfuric acid) is pumped through drill-holes into the ore deposit, and the uranium-bearing liquid is pumped out from below.

Note: It is currently unclear which technique will be utilized in Arizona, and on the ArizonaStrip. Mines that currently exist and are on “standby” status are all underground. In-situchemical leaching may not be feasible because of the location of uranium mineralization vs. thelevel of aquifers. In Arizona Strip breccia pipes, uranium deposits are thought to occur at depthsof 1000-1500 feet. The water table in this area is within the Mississippian layer located around2500 feet. On the schematic of the breccia pipe above (Fig. 3), the Mississippian layer would belocated beneath the Esplanade Sandstone. It might be possible to pump in water when uraniumdeposits exists outside of an aquifer – but this is unclear.

Advantages of in-situ chemical leaching over physical removal of ore from open-pit or underground mines are:

reduced risk to employees from accidents and radiation – miners are not directly exposed to the orebody;

lower cost; does not produce large tailings piles – waste is confined to evaporation ponds; and much less ground disturbance – less environmental rehabilitation needed.

Disadvantages are: existence of some radiation risk during the extraction process; danger of leaching liquids inadvertently contaminating ground water; unpredictable effects of the leaching liquid on deposit host rock; production of small amounts of waste sludge and waste water when recovering the

leaching liquid; and impossible to restore the leaching zone to natural conditions after processing is

completed.

Following in-situ leaching, waste sludge must be dumped in a final deposit and the aquifer orezone restored to pre-leaching conditions. Unfortunately, recent evaluations of current practicesnote it is nearly impossible to re-establish pre-leach levels for all parameters. Further, groundwater restoration can be a very timely and burdensome process, and is not yet completelyunderstood.

Exploration and Mining InfrastructureInfrastructure associated with exploration is minimal. Plans generally outline the use of existingroads and potential cross-country routes to reach the target and set up rig-mounted trucks.Operators would require access to the site several times per day for about a week. Theinfrastructure associated with mining is more extensive and may include a mine office, mineshop/warehouse, hoist house, mineshaft, water well, powerline, evaporation pond(s), ore stockpile, as well as maintained access roads.

Uranium MiningApril 200711

4. Current/Future Activities in AZ

Ten areas of known uranium production and occurrence have been identified by the ArizonaDepartment of Mines and Mineral Resources (ADMMR) and are grouped by general landform;1. Colorado Plateau, 2. Basin and Range Province, and 3. Transition Zone (see Fig. 8).According to ADMMR Arizona has excellent potential for development of new uraniumresources. ADMMR projected that if exploration had continued at the 1980 rate, that by year2000 over 100 million pounds of new mineralization would have been identified.

Figure 8. Areas of Known Uranium Production and Occurrence as Identified bythe Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources (ADMMR)

Uranium MiningApril 200712

A resurgence of interest in the uranium industry has been sparked by increasing uranium prices.Current prices are up from a low of about $7 per pound in 1990 to approximately $120 per poundas of June 2007. Acquisition of uranium properties in Arizona surged during the past severalyears with more than 25 companies reporting acquisitions or claim staking targets (BLM pers.comm.).

In Arizona, all new mining claims on federal lands must first be recorded by the appropriatecounty, and then through the BLM (even for Forest Service lands). Based on recent claimsactivity, there have been three locations of particular interest (BLM pers. comm.):

1. Arizona Strip (Colorado Plateau) – BLM Lands2. Anderson Mine area near Alamo Lake (Basin and Range) – BLM Lands3. Red Butte between Valle and Tusayan (Colorado Plateau) – Kaibab National Forest

A fourth area near Workman Creek (Transition/Basin and Range) has also been identified byADMMR as having uranium potential, with recent claims and exploratory activities.

The Colorado PlateauNorthwestern Arizona has been recognized as having the highest-grade uranium depositscontained within breccia pipes in the U.S.. The uranium content of most ore is frequentlybetween 0.1% and 0.2%; however, the average grade of uranium ore mined in the Arizona Striphas been reported as 0.65% and 0.80%.

Due to the exponential increase in uranium prices and Arizona’s unusually rich uranium deposits,mineral claims and exploration for uranium on the Arizona Strip have doubled in the past twoyears. According to the BLM, over 5,000 mining claims have been made since 2004 and 22notices for hundreds of exploratory drill holes have been processed.

There are approximately 25 companies staking claims on the Arizona Strip (a few are detailedbelow). Of these, six have submitted to the BLM their Notice of Intent for operation and at leastone Plan of Operation has been presented.

Notice of Intent for Exploration: Notices of Intent usually encompass less than five acresoutside of biologically or culturally sensitive areas. They are not considered a FederalAction (i.e., NEPA is not required); however, surveys/clearances for threatened andendangered species as well as cultural resources are completed prior to exploration.

Plan of Operation: Plans of Operation are generally for mining or explorationdisturbances exceeding five acres and/or in a biologically or culturally sensitive area.They do require NEPA, usually at the Environmental Assessment level. One example ofa Plan of Operation for exploration is the Kanab Creek proposal. This plan is on holdbecause of a request to use water from Kanab Creek.

There are currently three historically developed underground mines on the Strip being consideredfor possible renewed production by Denison Resources (Fig. 9). They are Arizona #1, KanabNorth, and Pine Nut. These mines are currently authorized under BLM mining plans ofoperations. Denison Resources also owns a partially developed mine, Canyon Mine, and at leastfive other prospects (EZ 1, EZ 2, DB 1, What, and Moonshine). All prospect holdings would be

Uranium MiningApril 200713

operated as underground mines (breccia pipes) except Moonshine which will likely be developedas an open-pit mine (sandstone).

To re-commence operation, these mines are required to update their Reclamation PerformanceBond with the BLM. They may also need to update aquifer protection permits with the ArizonaDepartment of Environmental Quality. It is expected that within the next year DenisonResources will move forward on necessary permitting to begin mining activities. Followingphysical extraction, ore would be transported to Blanding, UT for processing.

In mid-2006, Tournigan acted to secure 413 federal lode and mining claims covering 8,260 acreson the Arizona Strip. This company may now be the largest holder of known and potentialuranium-containing breccia pipe targets along the Strip. Ongoing field evaluations indicate thatat least 20 of the 83 identified structures are true breccia pipes.

Quaterra Resources acquired claims covering 36 targets, and in early 2006 began exploring ninebreccia pipe structures in northern Arizona. Three have been drilled but data is not available; theremaining six have not yet been drilled. Quincy Energy entered into an option agreement withEnergy Metals covering eight properties and plans to explore the mineralized Rose breccia pipe.

Figure 9.

Uranium MiningApril 200714

Other companies acquiring previously drilled or suspected pipes as exploration targets along theColorado Plateau include: Standard Uranium, Energy Metals, Liberty Star Gold, and VANEMinerals.

VANE also plans to search for uranium in the Red Butte and Upper Basin area on the KaibabNational Forest.

New uranium mines will not be approved by the Navajo Nation. The Nation has banned uraniummining due to severe human health issues arising from a 1950’s mining operation on thereservation.

Basin and Range ProvinceAccording to the ADMMR, the Basin and Range Province has the potential to produce upwardsof 126 million pounds of uranium. However, other than small open pit production in the mid1950’s, few companies are pursuing claims because deposits in this region are not as rich as theColorado Plateau breccia pipe ore.

Concentric Energy has acquired the Anderson Mine, and Energy Metals has acquired an adjacentland-holding on drilled ground. Both are gathering and digitizing historic data as well asevaluating various development options. Concentric Energy is also assembling baselineenvironmental data and planning exploration.

Basin and Range Province and Transition ZoneCooper Minerals has leased to Rodinia Minerals a claim group in the Workman Creek area.Additional claims have been staked on nearby properties and drilling is planned. Rodinia andjoint venture partner Patriot Power have conducted drilling and sampling programs on the LuckyBoy and Mormon Lake (Pennsylvanian sediments) properties located in Gila County.

SummaryArizona contains an estimated 79 million pounds of known uranium, and exploratory drilling hasindicated a potential exceeding 126 million pounds for ore at greater depths. Thus far, majorproduction of uranium in Arizona has only occurred on the Colorado Plateau.

Uranium MiningApril 200715

5. Human and Environmental Effects of UraniumMining

Information on the wildlife toxicity of uranium and its byproducts is somewhat limited.Additional review of current literature is needed to further describe these effects. Wildlifespecies may be directly affected by new roads, cross country travel, and road upgrades (paving,resurfacing, and improving) associated with mining and exploration activity.

Generally, mines and mining waste may release radionuclides, including radon, and otherpollutants into streams, springs, and other bodies of water. The highest concentrations of radiumfrom uranium waste and residue is found in air and water samples from areas where uraniummining has occurred. Radium in the soil may be absorbed by plants and may accumulate in fishand other aquatic organisms.

Most human health risks due to energy production have the potential to threaten wildlife as well.Air pollution harms wildlife through acidification of lakes and streams, negatively affectingforage and prey species abundance. Acid deposition can also trigger the ionic release ofaluminum which kills fish and aquatic invertebrates, and impacts calcium sources resulting inweaker eggshells from calcium-deprived birds. Acid mine drainage, chemical leaks, and toxicrunoff from storage piles and tailings directly endanger local waterfowl and migratory birds.Water demands from mining may further alter water availability. Acid drainage mitigationoptions include neutralizing acid runoff with limestone, and impounding pyrite-bearing wasterock to avoid sulfuric acid formation. Unfortunately, such solutions are impermanent at best.

A study evaluating fish responses to direct uranium exposure reported that gill membranes play akey role in the uptake of metals. The absorption of soluble metal fractions leads to distributionthroughout the whole body and potential deleterious effects in target organisms.

Analysis of trace elements and radionuclide levels in aquatic invertebrates, fish, and birds fromthe Puerco and Little Colorado Rivers found that flycatchers feeding on insects containingvarious levels of aluminum experienced severe eggshell defects, reduced clutch sizes, and a highincidence of mortality. Doves appear more resilient to contaminated insects. Aluminum inconcentrations detected in fish from the Little Colorado River may also present ecological risksto the survival and reproduction of resident fish-eating birds. Researchers concluded that birdswith predominantly fish diets may be in danger of bioaccumulating potentially hazardousconcentrations of mercury and other elements. Waterfowl and wading birds that consumeprimarily aquatic invertebrates may not bioaccumulate elements to the same degree as top levelpredators such as fish-eating birds.

Uranium mine waste from operations closed before the mid-1970s are of particular concern. Inmany cases, these mines are unclaimed and waste piles remain nearby. Weathering can produceradioactive dust susceptible to wind dispersal, while additional contaminants pollute surface andgroundwater. There are also cases of unclaimed uranium mine waste being used for houseconstruction, creating significant radon and radiation hazards to humans.

Uranium MiningApril 200716

6. Mining Regulations Pertinent to Uranium

Mining and Mineral Leasing: several laws governing mining relate to mineral leasing on publiclands.

Mining Act of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 21, et seq.) authorizes and governsprospecting and mining for "hardrock" minerals on public lands.

Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) authorizes and governsleasing of public lands for development of deposits of coal, oil, gas and otherhydrocarbons, sulphur, phosphate, potassium, and sodium. Section 185 of this titlecontains provisions relating to granting of rights-of-ways over federal lands for pipelines.

43 CFR 3809 Exploration and Mining Activities on Bureau of Land Management Lands

43 CFR 3830 Location of Mining Claims

43 CFR 3833 Recordation of Mining Claims

36 CFR 228 (A) Exploration and Mining Activities on Forest Service Lands

ARS Title 27 – Minerals, Oils and Gas

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)EPA established environmental protection standards for mill tailings under requirements of theUranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA).

EPA also has other standards and special programs to control radiation in operating mines andmills, select old mines and mills, and from associated uranium-based products.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)NRC, or its Agreement States, license and oversee the operations of mills, heaps, and in-situleaching solution mines.

Mill sites regulated by NRC, NRC Agreement States, and the U.S. Department of Energy havewaste holding areas constructed under environmental protection standards established by EPA..

The StatesMany states have signed formal agreements with NRC to assume regulatory authority over thelicensing and operations of mills and in-situ leaching solution mines.

U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) MSHA enforces compliance with mandatory safety and health standards to eliminate fatalaccidents, reduce the frequency and severity of nonfatal accidents, minimize health hazards, andpromote improved safety and health conditions in the nation's mines.

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Uranium MiningApril 200717

DOE takes control of closed and reclaimed mills, and reclaims some mill sites as authorized byCongress.

U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) BLM is responsible for managing 262 million acres of land (about one-eighth the total landsurface of the United States) and about 300 million additional acres of subsurface mineralresources, including mines. The Office of Surface Mining provides funds to state and tribalagencies for reclaimation of uranium mines.

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Forest Service (NFS) NFS reclaims abandoned mines in National Forests.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)The Corps of Engineers operates the Formerly Utilized Site Remedial Action Program(FUSRAP) that was originally established by DOE in 1974 to identify, investigate, and clean upcontaminated sites formerly used by DOE's predecessor agencies. In some cases, these sitesinclude mining and milling sites with radioactive levels that exceed current standards. FUSRAPcoverage also pertains to sites from the early years of the nation's atomic energy program.Through FUSRAP, federal agencies, state and local governments, and property owners workcooperatively to control radioactive material. The Corps of Engineers has also assisted EPA andseveral Tribes in the cleanup of abandoned mines on tribal properties.

7. How the Department Can Be Involved

In order for the Department to effectively be involved in providing comments orrecommendations on proposed exploration or mining activities, we must first understand howuranium mining takes place on federal lands.

Uranium mining falls under the Minerals and Mining Program under the BLM. Uranium isconsidered a “locatable mineral”, which can be obtained by filing a mining claim. Amining claim is a particular parcel of federal land, for which an individual (or company)has asserted a right of possession. The right is restricted to the extraction and developmentof a mineral deposit as regulated by BLM or the FS. Generally speaking, a mining claimfor uranium mineralization would be considered a “lode claim” that occurs as a vein of oreis located (vs. a “placer claim” that occurs when minerals are dispersed among particles ofsand or gravel).

Mining claims, on either BLM or FS lands, are first filed with the appropriate county andwith the BLM State Office.

Claims may only be placed on lands open to mineral entry. Claims may not be staked inareas closed to mineral entry by a special act of Congress, regulation, or public land order(National Monuments, Wilderness, etc.).

Department involvement can occur at various points during mining activity including theexploratory phase. Examples include the permit or authorization stage required for compliancewith federal legislation such as the National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Water Act, and

Uranium MiningApril 200718

Endangered Species Act, all of which require coordination with the state wildlife agency. Thisfederal nexus allows the state an opportunity to provide comments, concerns, and mitigationrecommendations to the applicant through the federal government and/or federal funding source.The Department also shares management authority with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(FWS) for migratory, threatened, and endangered species through Department involvementduring Section 7 Consultation processes and development of FWS Biological Opinions.

Region II will be coordinating on site field reconnaissance visits for proposed explorationactivities on Arizona Strip BLM lands. In addition, the Department provides comment on newprojects proposed for federal lands during agency coordination meetings, NEPA reviews, andother federal permitting activities.

Uranium MiningApril 200719

8. Resources Compiled and/or Cited

WISE Uranium Projecthttp://www.wise-uranium.org

Uranium Mining and Milling Wastes: An Introductionhttp://www.wise-uranium.org/uwai.html#UMIN

Uranium Mining and Millinghttp://www.wise-uranium.org/stk.html?src=stkd01e

Impacts of Uranium In-Situ Leachinghttp://www.wise-uranium.org/uisl.html

Arizona’s Metallic Resources Trends and Opportunities. 2006. Mining Summary; 2006 Exploration Overview; Additional Information Sources. Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources.http://www.admmr.state.az.us/

Mining & Processing; In Situ Leaching Method. http://www.uraniumsa.org/processing/insitu_leaching.htm

Uranium Mining; Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining

Wise NC Uranium Mining Specialhttp://www.10antenna.nl/wise/439-440/chapter3.html

Impacts of Resource Development on Native American Lands; Environmental Impacts on the Navajo Nation from Uranium Mininghttp://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/nativelands/navajo/environmental.html

The Environmental Imperative for Renewable Energy: An Update. Land, Water, and Wildlife Impacts.http://www.repp.org/repp_pubs/articles/envImp/04impacts.htm

Mineral Investigation in the Hack Canyon Wilderness Study Area.http://www.admmr.state.az.us/DigitalLibrary/USBM_MLA/USBM_MLA_037-84.pdf

Changes in oxidative stress parameters in fish as response to direct uranium exposure. Radioprotection, Suppl. 1, vol. 40 (2005) S151-S155.http://www.edpsciences.org/articles/radiopro/pdf/2005/02/o202.pdf?access=ok

Wildlife studies along the Puerco and Little Colorado Riverhttp://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Documents/R2ES/RadionuclidesAZ.pdf

Rumble, M.A. and A.J. Bjusgstad. 1986. Uranium and radon concentrations in plants growing onuranium mill tailings in South Dakota. Reclamation and Revegetation Res. 4:271-277.

Uranium MiningApril 200720

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Uranium Mineshttp://www.epa.gov/radtown/uranium-mines.htm

Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act7 November 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThis page provides a summary of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act and links to pages with additional information.

Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores and Minerals (PDF) (139pp, 545Kb)31 January 1995. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThis document show the results of EPA’s research into the uranium extraction and beneficiation of uranium in the United States.

Rad NESHAPs: Subpart B: Underground Uranium Mines15 September 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThis site provides information on Subpart B of the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, which protects the public and the environment from the radon-222 emissions to the ambient air from underground uranium mines.

Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (TENORM)2006. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyAt this site, you can find information on health concerns, the products, processes and industries that generate TENORM and applicable EPA laws and guidelines.

Uranium: The Basics15 September 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThis site provides basic answers to frequently asked questions about uranium.

Uranium (PDF) (15pp, 308Kb)15 September 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThis paper discusses the process of uranium production from the types of mining techniques to enriching the uranium. “What is Uranium? How does it work?” 31 January 2002. World Nuclear AssociationThis page provides information on uranium and the role it plays in creating nuclear power.

Lands and Minerals Databases 23 February 2006.U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Public land information through three popular lands and minerals databases that provide essential information to the public: GeoCommunicator, Legacy Rehost 2000 (LR2000) System reports, and public eForms.

Directory of Agreement State and Non-Agreement State Directors and State Liaison Officers7 February 2006. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionThis page provides contact information for state radiation programs.

Uranium MiningApril 200721

Early Uranium Mining in the United States 30 September 1989. World Nuclear AssociationThis paper, which tells the story of the early days of Uranium mining in the United States, was presented by F J Hahne at the Fourteenth International Symposium held by the Uranium Institute in London, September 1989.

Formerly Utilized Site Remedial Action Program19 August 1996. U.S. Department of Energy This technical report presents the results of EPA’s research into the uranium mining industry in the United States and is one in a series of profiles of major mining industry sectors.

How Is the Public Protected from Radiation? 10 December 2002. National Safety CouncilThis page discusses the different ways that the United States’ government agencies are involved in protecting the public from unnecessary radiation exposure.

Long-Term Stabilisation of Uranium Mill Tailings (PDF) (119 pp, 1.27Mb]

7 February 2003. International Atomic Energy AgencyThis document discusses the issues surrounding uranium mill tailings and the processesfor stabilizing and isolating that waste.

Mine Safety and Health AdministrationU.S. Department of LaborThis site is for the Mine Safety and Health Administration, ensuring worker safety and health in the nations mines.

State and Tribal Programs Site – State Regulations and Legislation16 February 2006. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionThis page lists links to state and tribal nuclear program contacts and the regulations and legislation associated with each program.

State Environmental Protection Division Listing 15 September 2005. Clay.net Environmental ProfessionalThis page lists links to the state environmental protection agencies.

Uranium Mill Tailings11 November 1999. U.S. Department of Energy This page provides information on mill tailings, the residual wastes of milled ore that remain after the uranium has been recovered.