UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MASTER PLANSEATTLE CAMPUS

Approved Compiled PlanJanuary 2003

Potential Development Sites

Figure IV-50 shows 68 potential development sites identifiedthroughout the University Campus. In addition to the eight projectscurrently approved and in design/construction under the GPDP, a totalof 60 new sites have been identified including those on undevelopedland or existing surface parking lots and those replacing existingbuildings. Sites identified for development vary from proposedbuildings only, to buildings combined with parking and dedicatedparking structures above and below ground. As mentioned previously,all displaced parking must be replaced to retain the required campusinventory, but not necessarily on the same site or at the same time.

The accompanying table shows the potential gross square footage foreach site based on maximum height and recommended footprints.The gross square footages do not include potential new constructionbelow grade. The second column lists the maximum allowable heightlimits based on TableV-2, Maximum Height Limits listed in Chapter V.Development Standards. The third column shows estimated floorsbased on the maximum height limit and floor-to1loor heights of 12-15feet. The Maximum Envelope Estimated is the number of levelsmultiplied by the recommended footprint for the site. Demo’d SF liststhe square footage of buildings that may be demolished on each site toaccomodate new construction.

The total area available for new construction is estimated to be 8.3million gross square feet not including the eight projects approved andin design/construction under the GPDR The potentially demolishedspace (870,000 gsf) is considered replacement area and is in additionto the 8.3 million gsf available. The total potential for newconstruction on campus could approximate 9.1 million gsf.

During the life of the plan, the University is expected to grow by 3million additional gross square feet (not including parking or the eightsites approved and in design/construction under the GPDP) toaccomodate academic programs, research activities and new studentgrowth. The 3 million gsf will be a portion of the total 8.3 million gsfavailable. (Any existing buildings demolished during the next tenyears will be considered replacement square footage and in additionto the 3 million gsf. The total new construction (excluding parking)thus may include 3 million gsf plus the total area of all the demolishedbuildings.) All sites presented are expected to continue in theircurrent use until selected by the Administration as sites that best meetthe University’s development needs. Demolition of current structuresmay occur prior to development.

Preliminary Square Footage Estimates o Table lV-4Mas.AIlo,ualale Ieigl,I k4as. [toot. Detroit Gctteeal (lot

Sac idescriptionl recoIl Esid FIoo.s(31 Bid 4) If (0)

IC (Burke Museum) (03 3)2000 MI2C (East of Observatory) (05 8 2)0.000 AfT3C (New Law School Buildingr — A4C North of Denny) 10 8 272.000 ASC (NW of Savory Rail) 10 8 28,000 A6C (MacKennel Balrserl 10 0 207,200 43.099 ATC (Southeast of Lewis) to o 330.400 - S.g60 Mr

C (cycloircet Shop) (6 (0 (40,000 A9c iPisys. Plan)) 3 4 204,000 NMUft1 DC (Northeast of Music) (0 8 (01.000 A0 IC ePadelford Garage I 0 8 . I(2C (South of Fluke Hail) (0 8 90.809 ABC (Ad~cent Facu(ty center) (0 0 (7,600 Atdt (Pfrys. Plant GOtces) (05 0 35(2,000 44.130 MtISC iEn~. Mines) tOt 8 303.200 (25,086 Abc (Nuctear Reactor, uedergtnd. 65 5 00,000 6.677 APc EEfcSE Phase 2)’ A( 8C (Rain. VinalRthts, Nail) ‘E’s S 14)000 50,32) MT9C (Rainier Vista Garage) 0 0 1

2oC )Ad~. Blood. & Wink. 5 05 5 66.000 Ac iGreenhouse) & Plant Lab) (05 0 116,000 22.112 A

Ic (Guthrie f (05 8 282.000 22.736 ASc South of Henry I (05 8 09,600 A4C (chefs. Library) (03 8 (60,000 39.363 ASC (West of )ohnson 9 (03 8 250.000 (4,758 A6C (Sieg( 05 8 140,800 57,t)0 A7W (West of Pub. Serv.l 6 S (40,000 MMUit (ftOW lEast of Pub. Setv.) ~ 5 t6),®O 22.077 NMU1II’T9W (Wesi of Mercer Hafl) 6 8 ‘60,000 MM134 fTW (West of condos Halt) tO 5 (65.600 NMUfFVTW (North of condos Hall) 65 0 (95.000 MMUIIIIT

32W (East ofCondos Hail ( 8 264.000 28.7(6 NMLIISIIT33W thV4 • Thir. Bldg. Add.) to’aak Sf3 240.000 toUt AiMS))) In34W (WS t info, office 5 6 S 55,000 3.073 MM6335W 1W6 • Ticket office) ‘~“~‘~ 5 182.400 20.904 NML1fT36W lAdtacee(l Gouldi 6 1 00000 5.8(1 Mt37W (West of Gould Hail) 63 5 309.000 03.307 MUMII38W (S. of Terry Lander 0 65 5 208.000 32.497 NMUI1 Vt39W (WOO. undeagiound ( 63 5 140W (W42.WesIolHendefsoni 03 8 48.400 NMU41W (South of Gould Nat)) 55 3 63(00 4M8 NT

2W IS. of Meice. Hall, undergtnd,)35 (Bryant Marina t (7 3 45(00 86.783 A

445 Academic Compsiffte I 30 4 (45.200 MI455 (South ofW. Camp.Gar.( 20 4 ((0.000 AfT465 iNorth of Ocean rchng.i 63 5 60,300 A —

475 IBiosciet,cesi’ A485 )Bt005gineerinwBlotechnotoe 5 230.000 A49$ )Por)ion of Harris Hydr.) 03 75,000 I 3,058 ASOS (North of s. camp Or I 55 5 (65.000 VI5)5 (Old Fish cries I 63 5 150.000 99.870 MT525 oWing Espansion I (03 6 (20,000 A535 (UWMC Surgery Pavilionr A685 (B, of W. Campus ParktnE Ga 30 4 28.000 MMLI54E IS. Douglas Rsch. Conseov.I 37) 1 90,000 A55€ (W. of Uiban Non. Cr.i 3’ 3 22,300 MISet (Grounds Matnlenasce) 87 I 4,300 AlMS)37€ (Golf Driving Range I 17) 5 22.500 MMLI58€ (Soccer Fteid Standsi 17 3 A59€ (Baseball Field Stands) 37 I AODE (Crew Rouse I’ Aelf (IMA Ewan,ionr A62€ indoor Practice fac iliryl’ I A63€ (Waterfront Act. Or I )7( 3 t 0,000 MMLI64€ )S(adiun,( 60 t I ‘ MI65€ (Blakety Village r ‘‘ I kI4LifI66€ (Tubby GiavesfT ennis couros( 65 1 (80.000 29,090 A67€ iPootlTubby Graves Mines) ‘~W~i (.3 56,250 7,000 A1CAMI’USWtOelO(ALAVAtLABLCSIICS

‘i GPDP Pro eciscsieeiitis ,.ppiosed and ,n design/c onsi,uci,oniii Osc)udingneecoissriuciioni be)ossgrade (2) Per Dewic1an,eisi Standards. COy

3) Assoine 2. tO’ 4’ ni Ii. depetiding so i~. SW Di .tii(. sacs 141 Based on ,ecoess’iI iusfpr. .0 skis. 5).iii A.Acadcnric NsFtousir~ ilueMised list r’bransj,o.oaiioti iSee cli V.Desei~,iiseni Siandards br ~tin’sI

86 University of Washington Master Plan--Seattle Campus: Development Program

C

S

p.4 ts

S

PtA.

I,

0

66/6ThImprove walk on Walla Walla Road ~and Snohomish LanePossible connection to IMAEastern lace should not extendbeyond face of IMA, realignWalla Walla RoadImprove intersection at Walla WallaRoad and Snohomish Lane

Improve pedestrian walk and preserve viewcorridor

Possible expansion of Graves Annex

Possible expansion into portion of parking

Southern face should not extend beyondexisting building face to west

ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA [-2 W

Legend

~ ] Polential Building EnvelopeArea of Influence

(SJ Service

Parking

Enily

Enhanced Pedestrian Circulation

•~ 200 Shoreline Setback

Figure IV-78

SITES 66E.67EUniversity of Washington Master Plan--Seattle Campus: Development Program116

Maintain and improveWahkiakum Lane accessfrom Mary Gates Way toMemorial Way

ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA [.5 ~

legend

Potential Building Envelope

Area of Influence

Service

® Parking

Entry

Enhanced Pedestrian Circulation

•.t 200 Shoreline Setback

Figure IV-81

SITES 55E, 54E119

SSEThree story buildi

~i3M~Jho~ O~?o•

1\W4&~.’ C’54EPotential greenhouse additionsor other development

Approved Compiled Plan January 2003

IIa.n

§0

InIn

00

I .

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MASTER PLANSEATTLE CAMPUS

Approved Compiled PlanJanuary 2003

Sector: In this Campus Master Plan, ‘sector’ refers to the entirecampus-wide area located within the MIO boundaries.

Upland Property: A property wholly or partly within the shorelinedistrict which is separated as of March 17, 1977, from the water by astreet, arterial highway, railroad right-of-way or government-controlled property which prevents access to and use of the water.Streets and other areas which create upland property include, but arenot limited to: Canal Road, NE Boat Street San Juan Road, WallaWalla Road, Columbia Road, and parking lots E-11 and E-12, andany other road or street which runs between the shoreline and thewater.

Waterfront Property: Any portion of property which is offshore orabuts upon the ordinary high watermark or mean high watermark andany other property partially or entirely within the Shoreline Districtwhich is not separated as of March 17, 1977, from the water by astreet, arterial, highway, or railroad right-of-way or governmentcontrolled property which prevents access and use of the water.

Boundaries

Figure V-I illustrates the campus boundaries. No expansions to theMIO boundaries are planned. If an expansion is sought in the future,the provisions of the City/University Agreement would apply. Currentnon-University ownerships within the MIO District are shown in thefigure.

Density: Gross Square Footage

The following is the method by which the University will calculatethe gross square footage (GSF) for the Campus Master Plan maximumgrowth limit.

The objective is to establish a procedure that allows the University toutilize its current and established FICM-GSF in calculating anadjusted GSF~ herein after referred to as “Campus Master Plan GSF.”(FICM stands for the Post-Secondary Facilities Inventory andClassification Manual published by the U.S. Department ofEducation). It is important that the University retain the FICM methodas a base line because all of its historical GSF, frequently used tomeasure growth and change, has been calculated using FICM; themethod for measuring is clearly defined and not subjective; the needfor data comparability between institutions (who also use 19CM) iscritical; and the ability to correlate Campus Master Plan GSF withFICM is important.

The purpose of the Campus Master Plan GSF is to achieve ameasurement comparable to those commonly used measures forcalculating, permitting, and zoning GSF.

The Campus Master Plan GSF will be calculated by first, calculatingthe FICM GSF, as described below, and second, adjusting the FICMGSF in accordance with the Adjustments and Exceptions listed below.

Burke-Gilman Trail ACM GSF Calculation:

The setback from the Burke-Gilman Trail will be measured from thepaved edges of the trail. The minimum setback requirement for newUniversity buildings will be generally 20 feet. In some cases thesetback is or may be less than 20 feet from the trail. For example, ifthere is an existing structure, significant landscaping, topography,some other kind of structure such as a bridge abutment, the setbackmay be varied. In these kinds of situations, project specific reviewwill be conducted in order to mitigate impacts on the trail. Thisreview will follow the University’s design review process.

1. The FICM-GSF will apply only to “buildings” on theSeattle Main Campus. A “building” is defined as a roofedstructure for permanent or temporary shelter of persons,animals, plants, materials, or equipment and exhibits thefollowing characteristics: it is attached to a foundation andhas a roof, is serviced by a utility, exclusive of lighting, and isthe source of significant maintenance and repair activities.

2. FICM-GSF is the sum of all areas on all floors of abuilding included within the outside faces of its exterior walls,

Approved Compiled Plan January 2003 127