University of Oxford B. R. Johnson 1 Title Slide MAXIPOL: A Bolometric, Balloon-Borne Half-Wave...
-
Upload
valerie-ross -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of University of Oxford B. R. Johnson 1 Title Slide MAXIPOL: A Bolometric, Balloon-Borne Half-Wave...
1University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Title SlideMAXIPOL: A Bolometric, Balloon-Borne Half-Wave PlatePolarimeter for Measuring the Polarization of the CMB
Bradley R. JohnsonNSF and PPARC Postdoctoral Fellow
University of Oxford
The MAXIPOL payload on the launch pad at the NSBF in Ft. Sumner, New Mexico, September 2002.
2University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
MAXIPOL Collaboration
Matthew Abroe1 Peter Ade3 Jamie Bock4 Julian Borrill5,6
Jeff Collins2 Pedro Ferreira7 Shaul Hanany1
Andrew Jaffe8 Bradley Johnson7 Terry Jones1 Adrian Lee2,9 Tomotake Matsumura1 Paul Oxley1 Bahman Rabii2 Tom Renbarger1
Paul Richards2 George Smoot2,6,9 Radek Stompor5 Huan Tran2 Celeste Winant2 Proty Wu10 Joe Zuntz8
1) School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA2) Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
3) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 4) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA
5) Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, USA6) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
7) Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK8) Astrophysics Group, Blackett Lab, Imperial College, London, UK
9) Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, USA10) Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
3University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
What are the Science Goals of MAXIPOL?
1) Implement half-wave plate (HWP) polarimetry in a CMB experiment.
- MAXIPOL is a pathfinder experiment -- HWP polarimeter techniques and
data analysis algorithms will be useful for B-mode experiments.
- MAXIPOL is a reimplementation of the MAXIMA hardware
- MAXIMA reported best receiver NET -- 40 K sec.
- We wanted to develop a polarization modulator -- HWP polarimeter is the best.
• Attempt detection of E-mode signal.
- Even with the high receiver sensitivity, predictions showed unambiguous
E-mode detection would be challenging -- long integration time was required.
- We collected data and data analysis is now concluding.
4University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
MAXIPOL Instrument
• Flight proven MAXIMA hardware.
• Sun shields not illustrated.
5University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Cross-Section of MAXIPOL Instrument
6University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Half-Wave Plate (HWP) Polarimeter
• signal amplitude corresponds to polarization magnitude.
• signal phase corresponds to polarization orientation.
• Q,U sky signals in the frequencydomain are away from 1/f noise
in sidebands of 4f
Q,U signal bandHWP rotation frequency
7University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
HWP Polarimeter Advantages
• Proven astronomical technique (see Astronomical Polarimetry by Tinbergen).
• 4f modulation provides strong rejection of systematic error.
• I, Q and U maps from ONE detector.
• Therefore, not susceptible to differential bolometer gain problems.
• Q, U signal is far from typical 1/f noise.
• Therefore, best noise performance is achieved.
8University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
HWP Polarimeter Hardware
HWP construction:
3.2 mm thick sapphire anti-reflection coated with Herasil.
9University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
MAXIPOL Payload on Launch Pad
sun shield
sun-facing surfacespainted white
terrestrialemission
baffleballoon
light fromthe sky
10University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
HWP synchronous
instrumental signals
ie. instrumental polarization
Signals in the Time Domain
time ordered data is comprised of four primary signals
these signals must be rejected
note: i is time index
modulated sky signals
cosmic rays, etc.
Reference: B. R. Johnson, J. S. Collins Ph.D. theses
11University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Signals in the Frequency Domain
power spectrum of TOD with hi and gi removed
12University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Signals in the Frequency Domain
telescope scan frequency
power spectrum of TOD with hi and gi removed
HWP rotation frequency
frequencydomain
representationof thebeam
13University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Signals in the Frequency Domain
telescope scan frequency
power spectrum of TOD with hi and gi removed
HWP rotation frequency
frequencydomain
representationof thebeam
Q and Usignalbands
T signalband
14University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Q,U Demodulation
• HWP polarimeter works.
• Nominal noise level is recovered in the Q,U signal band.
• Maps from demodulated data show no systematic error.
15University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Polarimeter Characterization
16University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Polarimeter Characterization
• receiver cross-polarization and HWP encoder offset
• modulation efficiency
• similar measurement limits instrumental polarization to < 1%
17University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Polarimeter Characterization
0.92 0.93 0.90
0.93 0.93 0.93
0.93 0.93 0.94
0.95 0.93 0.92
Results agree with predicted performance
assuming Pin = 0.97 and normal incidence for radiation
Modulation Efficiency Across the Array
error in measured
modulation efficiency = 1%
for all array elements
18University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
MAXIPOL-1 Flight
• 26 hour flight from Ft. Sumner, New Mexico, USA in May 2003.
• Four regions of the sky were observed.
• Jupiter was mapped twice. - beam shape - calibration
• CMB dipole was scanned.
19University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Primary MAXIPOL-1 Scan Regions
SFD Dust Map Extrapolated to 140 GHz
PrimaryDust scan:
1.9 hourscentered on
Polaris:
Dust signal =38 ± 5 K
PrimaryCMB scan:
7.6 hourscentered onBeta Ursae
Minoris.
Expecteddust signal =4.4 ± 0.7 K
• MAXIPOL Pointing Illustrated.
Schlegel, Finkbeiner and Davis. 1998. ApJ, 500:525-553.
20University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Intensity Calibration from Jupiter
beam map from one 140 GHz photometer
• Primary calibration from Jupiter observations.
• Map and best-fit Gaussian contours overplotted (1, 10, 50 and 90%)
• Some photometer beams were not sampled in every pixel
• Final calibration results from maximum-likelihood analysis
21University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Data Analysis
• Data analysis is near completion.
• Two analysis algorithms are being used -- MADCAP and frequentist approach.
• Both methods are producing consistent results.
• Q,U maps are Gaussian, contain no detectable systematic error.
22University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Conclusion
• MAXIPOL demonstrated HWP polarimetry works for CMB experiments to the sensitivity limit of the instrument.
• Data analysis is near completion.
• Results papers are currently being written.
• Papers will include Q, U maps and power spectrum estimates.
• Experiences from MAXIPOL are advising future B-mode HWP experiments -- EBEX, Polarbear.
MAXIPOL-0 Launch
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
23University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
EBEX
expected EBEX performance
• NASA funded LDB balloon experiment
• achromatic HWP polarimeter
• 1476 detectors
• sensitivity: 0.7 K per pixel Q,U
24University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
END
25University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Wrong Way
26University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Instrumental Signals
16 minutes of MAXIPOL TOD
HWP synchronous instrumental signallargest contributor is instrumental polarization
same data plotted vs. HWP angle
27University of OxfordB. R. Johnson
Instrumental Signal Removal
telescope scan frequency
power spectrum of TOD
differential transmission
HWP rotationfrequency
frequencydomain
representationof thebeam
instrumentalpolarization