University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in...
11
Transcript of University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in...
![Page 1: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: University of Missouri–Kansas City · 2012. 12. 26. · what some have considered implicit in Querp: that a State is not a person within the meaning of § 1983. We observe initially](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071607/6144dd6934130627ed509f7f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)