UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT … · case mdl no. 1932 document 223 filed 10/22/14...

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANELon

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

Pursuant to the order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed today,notice is hereby given that a hearing session has been scheduled to consider various matterspursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: December 4, 2014

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: United States District Court - AnnexCourtroom No. 5, 4th Floor

85 Broad Street Charleston, South Carolina 29401

TIME OF HEARING SESSION: In those matters designated for oral argument, counselpresenting oral argument must be present at 8:00 a.m. in order for the Panel to allocate theamount of time for oral argument. Oral argument will commence at 9:30 a.m.

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

• Section A of this Schedule lists the matters designated for oral argument and includes all actions encompassed by Motion(s) for transfer filed pursuant to Rules 6.1 and 6.2. Any party waiving oral argument pursuant to Rule 11.1(d) does not need to appear at the Hearing Session.

• Section B of this Schedule lists the matters that the Panel has determined to consider without oral argument, pursuant to Rule 11.1(c). Parties and counsel involved in these matters need not attend the Hearing Session.

ORAL ARGUMENT: The Panel carefully considers the positions advocated in filings with thePanel when it allocates time to attorneys presenting oral argument. The Panel, therefore, expectsattorneys to adhere to those positions (including those concerning an appropriate transfereedistrict). Any change in position should be conveyed to Panel staff before the beginning of oralargument. Where an attorney thereafter advocates a position different from that conveyed toPanel staff, the Panel may reduce the allotted argument time and decline to hear further from thatattorney.

Case MDL No. 1932 Document 223 Filed 10/22/14 of 31

- 2 -

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than November 17, 2014. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres tothese procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. LüthiClerk of the Panel

cc: Clerk, United States District for the District of South Carolina


UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANELon

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on December 4, 2014, the Panel will convene a hearing session in Charleston, South Carolina, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transferof any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel will hear oral argument on the matters listedon Section A of the attached Schedule, unless the parties waive oral argument or unless the Panellater decides to dispense with oral argument pursuant to Panel Rule 11.1(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel will consider without oral argument thematters listed on Section B of the attached Schedule pursuant to Panel Rule 11.1(c). The Panelreserves the prerogative, on any basis including submissions of parties pursuant to Panel Rule11.1(c), to designate any of those matters for oral argument.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on MultidistrictLitigation shall direct notice of this hearing session to counsel for all parties involved in thematters on the attached Schedule.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

_________________________________ Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan R. David Proctor

Ellen Segal Huvelle Catherine D. Perry


SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSIONDecember 4, 2014 !! Charleston, South Carolina

SECTION AMATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

(This schedule contains only those civil actions listed in the Schedule(s) of Actions submitted with the docketedmotion(s) for transfer. See Panel Rules 6.1 and 6.2. In the event these dockets are centralized, other actions of whichthe Panel has been informed may be subject to transfer pursuant to Panel Rule 7.1.)

MDL No. 2575 ! IN RE: FLUIDMASTER, INC., WATER CONNECTOR COMPONENTSPRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Fluidmaster, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the UnitedStates District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Central District of California

STEVEN RENSEL, ET AL. v. FLUIDMASTER, INC., C.A. No. 8:14!00648

Northern District of Illinois

SULLIVAN, ET AL. v. FLUIDMASTER, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!05696

District of New Hampshire

HARDWICK v. FLUIDMASTER, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!00363

Western District of Pennsylvania

HUNGERMAN, ET AL. v. FLUIDMASTER, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!00994

MDL No. 2576 - IN RE: CYMBALTA (DULOXETINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITYLITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court forthe Central District of California:

District of Arizona

SEAGROVES, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:13!01183


ERIN HEXUM, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:13!02701


CLAUDIA HERRERA, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:13!02702

DEBORAH CAPORALE, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:14!01662

ANITA HOLLOWELL, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:14!01663PEGGY BARRETT, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:14!01675KERRY O'SHEA, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:14!01274

Eastern District of California

CHESHIER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:14!01265WOODRUFF, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:14!01890

Southern District of California

WHEELER, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:14!01882

District of Colorado

CHENEY, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:14!02249

Middle District of Florida

LAICA-BHOGE, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 6:14!01286

Southern District of Florida

GOLLIN, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 0:14!61810

Northern District of Georgia

COUCH v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!02564

Western District of Louisiana

FAIRBANKS v. ELI LILLY & CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!02469

District of Maryland

BOLING, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:14!02554

District of Minnesota

MCCABE v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:14!03132

- 2 -


Southern District of New York

MCDOWELL v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:13!03786

Eastern District of North Carolina

WHITWORTH, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:14!00459WILLIAMS, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:14!00460

Middle District of North Carolina

HARRIS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00682

Northern District of Ohio

MAYES v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 4:14!01759

District of Oregon

LOUX, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:14!01287

Western District of Pennsylvania

ROSSERO, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:14!01084

Eastern District of Washington

WAGNER, ET AL. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:14!00270

Western District of Wisconsin

STREETER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:14!00555

MDL No. 2577 - IN RE: GAF ELK CROSS TIMBERS DECKING MARKETING, SALESPRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Ken Burger to transfer the following actions to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Ohio:

District of Colorado

KAISER v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, C.A. No. 1:14!02229

- 3 -



ERNST v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA D/B/A/ GAFMATERIALS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 3:14!50182

Southern District of Indiana

STIDHAM v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, C.A. No. 2:14!00247

Southern District of Iowa

SHERIDAN v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, C.A. No. 4:14!00325


ROBERTIE, ET AL. v. GAF BUILDING MATERIALS CORP., C.A. No. 7:14!00165

Southern District of Ohio

BURGER v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, C.A. No. 1:14!00513

MDL No. 2578 ! IN RE: JAMES REEDOM LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff James Reedom to transfer the following actions to a single UnitedStates district court:

District of Puerto Rico

REEDOM v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, C.A. No. 3:13!01619

Northern District of Texas

REEDOM v. COLVIN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14!00709

- 4 -


MDL No. 2579 ! IN RE: MAPCO EXPRESS, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITYBREACH LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff WinSouth Credit Union to transfer the following actions to the UnitedStates District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee:


FIRST NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK v. MAPCO EXPRESS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:14!00031

Middle District of Tennessee

WINSOUTH CREDIT UNION v. MAPCO EXPRESS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01573

PHILLIPS v. MAPCO EXPRESS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01710

MDL No. 2580 ! IN RE: OPANA ER ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Wisconsin Masons’ Health Care Fund to transfer the following actionsto the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:


WISCONSIN MASONS' HEALTH CARE FUND v. ENDO HEALTHSOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!04651

VALUE DRUG COMPANY v. ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:14!05416

PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND v. ENDO HEALTHSOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!06171

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS,INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!03185

FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUSTFUND v. ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!03190

MASSACHUSETTS BRICKLAYERS & MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUNDv. ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!04355

- 5 -


MDL No. 2581 ! IN RE: CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC, PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Taylor Publishing Company; Integracolor; Imagine! Print Solutions,Inc.; Performance Companies, LP; PrintPlace.com; Cockrell Enovation, Inc.; Cockrell PrintingCo.; ONeil Data Systems, Inc.; TST/Impreso, Inc.; Primary Color Systems Corporation;Professional Printers Inc.; and Indexx Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Northern District of Texas:

Northern District of Alabama

CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!00812


CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. CENTRAL FLORIDA PRESS, LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 6:14!00679


CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. REX THREE, INC., C.A. No. 0:14!60992 CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. ORIGINAL IMPRESSIONS, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!21498CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. SOLO PRINTING, C.A. No. 1:14!21499CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. FRANKLIN-DODD COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!21518CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. SOUTHEASTERN PRINTING COMPANY, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!14175CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. WORLDWIDE TICKETS AND LABELS, INC., C.A. No. 9:14!80556


CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. PRIMARY COLOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:13!02169CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. WALTON PRESS, INC., C.A. No. 1:13!02174CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. GEO GRAPHICS INC., C.A. No. 1:14!01394

Western District of Kentucky

CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. V. G. REED AND SONS, INC., C.A. No. 3:14!00364

District of South Carolina

TP INNOVATIONS LLC v. PROFESSIONAL PRINTERS, INC., C.A. No. 3:14!01733CTP INNOVATIONS LLC v. INDEXX, INC., C.A. No. 6:14!01770

- 6 -



CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. AMERICAN PRINTING COMPANY, INC., C.A. No. 3:13!00582

CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. MPI LABEL SYSTEMS, C.A. No. 3:13!00583CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. JET PRINTING, LLC, C.A. No. 3:13!00585

Eastern District of Texas

CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. INTEGRACOLOR, C.A. No. 2:13!00484CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, LP,

C.A. No. 2:13!00485CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. TST/IMPRESO, INC., C.A. No. 2:13!00489CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. IMAGINE! PRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.,

C.A. No. 2:13!00490CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. PRINTPLACE.COM, C.A. No. 2:13!00492CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. O'NEIL DATA SYSTEMS, INC., C.A. No. 2:13!00495CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC v. COCKRELL ENOVATION, INC., ET AL.,

C.A. No. 2:13!00496


TAYLOR PUBLISHING COMPANY v. CTP INNOVATIONS LLC, C.A. No. 3:13!02222

MDL No. 2582 ! IN RE: OXYELITE PRO AND JACK3D PRODUCTS LIABILITYLITIGATION (NO. II)

Motion of defendant USPlabs, LLC, to transfer the following actions to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of California or, alternatively, the United States DistrictCourt for the Northern District of Texas:


JAIME FRANCO v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!00592

Northern District of California

VISTA v. USPLABS LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:14!00378


RIZZO v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!20421

- 7 -


District of Hawaii

VAN HOUTEN v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:13!00635WAIKIKI v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:13!00639AKAU v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00029IGAFO v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00030ISHIHARA v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00031MATTSON v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00032CARLISLE, ET AL. v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00363DAVIDSON, ET AL. v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00364OFISA, ET AL. v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00365PANTOHAN, ET AL. v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00366PAVAO, ET AL. v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00367

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

BATTUELLO v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:13!04101

Western District of Texas

SPARLING, ET AL. v. DOYLE, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:13!00323OGBONNA v. USPLABS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:13!00347

MDL No. 2583 ! IN RE: THE HOME DEPOT, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITYBREACH LITIGATION

Motion, as amended, of plaintiffs John Solak, et al., to transfer the following actions to theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Southern District of California

KHALAF, ET AL. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., C.A. No. 3:14!02175


RIVERON, ET AL. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., C.A. No. 9:14!81175


SOLAK, ET AL. v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!02856MAZEROLLE v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!02887MURPHY v. HOME DEPOT, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!02909FIRST CHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.,

C.A. No. 1:14!02975

- 8 -



O'BRIEN v. HOME DEPOT, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!06975DOLEMBA v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., C.A. No. 1:14!07220

Southern District of Illinois

MARKO, ET AL. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., C.A. No. 3:14!00981

Eastern District of Missouri

HARTMAN v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., C.A. No. 4:14!01545

Eastern District of New York

O'BRIEN, ET AL. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!05301

MDL No. 2584 ! IN RE: PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC., FAIR LABOR STANDARDSACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Payless Shoesource, Inc.; Collective Brands, Inc.; Collective BrandServices, Inc.; Payless Shoesource, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan; and Payless Shoesource, Inc.,as Plan Administrator to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for theWestern District of New York:

District of Connecticut

SHALLIN, ET AL. v. PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00335

Western District of New York

MANIGAULT, ET AL. v. PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00664

MDL No. 2585 ! IN RE: ROBERT REEDOM LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Robert Reedom to transfer the following actions to a single UnitedStates district court:

District of New Jersey

REEDOM v. CRAPPELL, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!05674

- 9 -


District of Virgin Islands

REEDOM v. CRAPPELL, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:13!00095

MDL No. 2586 ! IN RE: SUPERVALU, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Supervalu, Inc. to transfer the following actions to the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of Idaho:


MCPEAK, ET AL. v. SUPERVALU, INC., C.A. No. 3:14!00899


HANFF, ET AL. v. SUPERVALU INC., C.A. No. 0:14!03252

MDL No. 2587 ! IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS CHARGES LITIGATION

Motion of Century Link Affiliates to transfer the following actions to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Northern District of Texas:

District of Delaware

MCI COMMUNICATION SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01138

Northern District of Florida

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP v. EMBARQ FLORIDA, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:14!00230


MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CENTURYLINKCOMMUNICATIONS, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!23305


SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. BELLSOUTHTELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01657

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. ACN COMMUNICATIONSERVICES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!02878

- 10 -


Central District of Illinois

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, ET AL. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!02212


SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONECOMPANY INCORPORATED, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01006

Southern District of Iowa

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CENTRAL SCOTTTELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00101

District of Kansas

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANYOF KANSAS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!02213

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. BLUE VALLEYTELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!02448


CENTURYTEL OF CHATHAM LLC, ET AL. v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L P, C.A. No. 3:09!01951

Western District of Michigan

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. ACE TELEPHONECOMPANY OF MICHIGAN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00937


SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. QWEST CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:14!01387

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. QWEST CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:14!03385

Western District of Missouri

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CENTURYTEL OFMISSOURI, LLC (BELLE-HERMAN), ET AL., C.A. No. 5:14!06099

- 11 -


District of New Jersey

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANYOF NEW JERSEY, C.A. No. 1:14!03147


SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. CAROLINA TELEPHONE ANDTELEGRAPH COMPANY, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:14!00317

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. ATLANTIC TELEPHONEMEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:14!00188

Northern District of Ohio

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. UNITED TELEPHONECOMPANY OF OHIO, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01380

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CENTURYTEL OFOHIO, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01977

Middle District of Pennsylvania

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. FIBERNETTELECOMMUNICATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01735


SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP v. CENTRAL TELEPHONECOMPANY OF TEXAS, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01724

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CAMERON TELEPHONECOMPANY LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!03210

Western District of Virginia

CI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. BUGGS ISLAND TELEPHONECO-OPERATIVE, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:14!00047

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L. P. v. CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:14!00298

Eastern District of Washington

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CENTURYTEL OFCOWICHE INC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!03131

- 12 -


Western District of Washington

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. CENTURYTEL OFINTER-ISLAND, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!01378

Western District of Wisconsin

MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., ET AL. v. AMELIA TELEPHONECORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00605

MDL No. 2588 ! IN RE: WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., GREEK YOGURTMARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Tracey Knox, et al., to transfer the following actions to the UnitedStates District Court for the District of Massachusetts:


CHAS JACKSON, ET AL. v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!06705


MARKLEY v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., C.A. No. 8:14!01892

District of Massachusetts

KNOX, ET AL. v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!13185


GRODNICK, ET AL. v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET INC., C.A. No. 1:14!07035

MDL No. 2589 ! IN RE: BARCLAYS LIQUIDITY CROSS AND HIGH FREQUENCYTRADING LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Barclays PLC and Barclays Capital Inc. to transfer the followingactions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:


GREAT PACIFIC SECURITIES v. BARCLAYS PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 8:14!01210

- 13 -



CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND v. BATS GLOBAL MARKETS, INC.,ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!02811

AMERICAN EUROPEAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. BATS GLOBAL MARKETS,INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!03133

HAREL INSURANCE CO, LTD. v. BATS GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!03608

FLYNN, ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!04321

MDL No. 2590 ! IN RE: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALESPRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Navistar International Corporation and Navistar, Inc., to transfer thefollowing actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:


PRIORITY TOWING, INC. v. NAVISTAR, INC., C.A. No. 9:14!81202

District of Idaho

FARM FRESH MARKETING, INC. v. NAVISTAR INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00558


PAR 4 TRANSPORT, LLC v. NAVISTAR, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!05151DENIS GRAY TRUCKING, INC., ET AL. v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:14!05249B&T EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:14!05841PIONEER TRANSPORTATION, LTD., ET AL. v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!07531ANTIOCH BUILDING MATERIALS, CO., ET AL. v. NAVISTAR, INC.,

C.A. No. 1:14!07602FOERST v. NAVISTAR, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!07680

District of Maryland

WESTERN MARYLAND TRANSPORT, INC. v. NAVISTAR, INC., ET AL.,Bky. Adv. No. 0:14!00510

- 14 -



GEORGE v. NAVISTAR, INC., C.A. No. 4:14!00493

Middle District of Pennsylvania

KLINGER v. NAVISTAR, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!01914


ROSS NEELY SYSTEMS, INC. v. NAVISTAR, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:13!01587GCKMAT LLC v. NAVISTAR, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:13!01591

Eastern District of Wisconsin

G&G SPECIALIZED CARRIERS LLC v. NAVISTAR, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!01057

MDL No. 2591 ! IN RE: SYNGENTA AG MIR162 CORN LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Munson Brothers Farm, et al., to transfer the following actions to theUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Eastern District of Arkansas

STRACENER FARMING COMPANY, ET AL. v. SYNGENTA AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14!00558

Central District of Illinois

TRANS COASTAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. v. SYNGENTA AG, ET AL.,C.A. No. 2:14!02221

HADDEN FARMS, INC. v. SYNGENTA CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!03302


MUNSON BROTHERS FARM, ET AL. v. SYNGENTA CORPORATION, ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:14!07806


BRIGGS, ET AL. v. SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01072

- 15 -


Northern District of Iowa

CRONIN, INC., ET AL. v. SYNGENTA CORPORATION ET AL, C.A. No. 5:14!04084

District of Kansas

MOLL v. SYNGENTA CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!02497


CLAAS, ET AL. v. SYNGENTA CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!04267

District of Nebraska

VOLNEK FARMS, INC. v. SYNGENTA CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 8:14!00305

MDL No. 2592 ! IN RE: XARELTO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Mark K. Lemp, et al.; Dorothy Leach; William F. Haney; StanleyPennell, et al.; Martha McMunn; and Michael Mulroney to transfer the following actions to theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois:

Northern District of Florida

NICHOLSON v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 5:14!00173


PACKARD v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 0:14!61448


LEMP, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00987

HANEY v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00988

LEACH v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00989

RUCKER v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01026

- 16 -


PENNELL, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01040

MCMUNN v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01042

BIVEN v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01050

MULRONEY v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 3:14!01073

Eastern District of Kentucky

BOLTON, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:14!00146


COX v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00579

Eastern District of Louisiana

BRASWELL v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 2:14!02258


JEFFCOAT v. JANSSEN REASEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:14!04524

GRIGGS, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!04841

BOYNTON, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!05133

USELTON v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:14!05728

GREEN, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!05871

District of Utah

ARMSTRONG, ET AL. v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!00599

- 17 -


District of Vermont

MCGOWAN v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET AL.,C.A. No. 2:14!00159

Southern District of West Virginia

DALRYMPLE v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ET. AL.,C.A. No. 5:14!25893

- 18 -


SECTION BMATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 1932 ! IN RE: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., WAGE AND HOUREMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION

Motions of defendant Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc., to transfer the followingactions to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina:


BEDFORD v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., C.A. No. 0:14!61993SANFORD v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., C.A. No. 0:14!61994RANDALL v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., C.A. No. 0:14!62285MCGEE v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!14370 MARTONE v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!14371

MDL No. 2187 ! IN RE: C.R. BARD, INC., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTSLIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Kimberly Peterson, et al., to transfer of the following action to theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia:

District of New Mexico

PETERSON, ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00723

MDL No. 2197 ! IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ASR HIP IMPLANTPRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Thomas Edwards, Charles Salvaggio, Natalie Brush, and GeorgeT. Kruzynski to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Courtfor the Northern District of Ohio:


EDWARDS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:14!01415SALVAGGIO v. MARK DEBIASE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:14!01416BRUSH v. BAYSIDE ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:14!02163KRUZYNSKI v. BAYSIDE ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:14!02165

- 19 -


MDL No. 2286 ! IN RE: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONECONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA) LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Ayza Corujo Canter and Charles Ludwig to transfer of theirrespective following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District ofCalifornia:


CANTER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGMENT, INC., C.A. No. 9:14!81073

Northern District of West Virginia

LUDWIG v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., C.A. No. 1:14!00100

MDL No. 2325 ! IN RE: AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., PELVIC REPAIRSYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of defendant LifeCell Corporation to transfer of the Eastern District of NewYork Whaley action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,and motion of plaintiffs to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the remaining following actionsto their respective transferor courts:

Northern District of Alabama

WALDROP v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!02422

RAINES v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:12!02426GRANT, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,

C.A. No. 7:12!02427

Southern District of Alabama

CLAYTON, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:12!00443

District of Idaho

BRUCE, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00396

KENICK v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00398

KNIGHT, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:12!00399

- 20 -


LEININGER, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:12!00403

NELSON, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:12!00406

BOOTH, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00408

ELLIOTT, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.C.A. No. 1:12!00409

LARSON, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!00401

BELNAP, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!00404

SOUTHWOOD, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!00407

Eastern District of Kentucky

FANNIN, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 0:12!00062

O'BRATH, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:12!00046

MURPHY v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:12!00205

SMITH, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:12!00223

ROBERTS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 6:12!00121

COOTS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:12!00134

DAVIS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:12!00139


FLANARY, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 3:12!00381

PENNINGTON, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!00081

Eastern District of Louisiana

WEISKOPF v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!01842

- 21 -



DUFOUR v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!01896FUSELIER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:12!01895


BALL, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!00232


WHALEY, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 2:14!04275


HENSLEY, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:12!00070

CLARK v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00071

KESTNER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:12!00706


ELLIS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!00413

PEACOCK, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 6:12!00438

Southern District of Texas

SENDT, ET AL. v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!00202

CASTILLO, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!02051

REYES, ET AL. v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICAL HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!02052

GRUBB, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!02053

KLOTZ, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!02054

- 22 -


CHAUMET v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!02055

CRANFIELD, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!02058

MONTGOMERY!WOODS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.,ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!02062

THACKER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:12!02063

HANSEN, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 4:12!02076

PEREZ, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:12!00032

CAMPBELL, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:12!00216

DIAZ v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 7:12!00221

Western District of Texas

FREEMAN, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,C.A. No. 1:12!00610

District of Utah

LINDHARDT, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00141

LEINWEBER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00142COX, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00161STIRDIVANT v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!00163BIRD v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00624BIRD, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00625CROCKER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00626GAUTHIER, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL.,

C.A. No. 2:12!00627MEADOWS v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL.,

C.A. No. 2:12!00629OWENS v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00630GILLETTE, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL.,

C.A. No. 2:12!00631BUTCHER, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL.,

C.A. No. 2:12!00632COOKE, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL.,

C.A. No. 2:12!00633

- 23 -


VALLEJOS v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00634

GRAY, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00635

LOWE, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00636

LARSEN, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00637

SHOCK, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00639

STEFANOFF, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00640

THOMPSON, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00641

GILES, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00643

ROJOS!ROGERS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00644

WILEY, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00645

CAPPS, ET AL. v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00745

DUMAS v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00747

MDL No. 2326 ! IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEMPRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Loretta Ortega, et al., to transfer of the following action to theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia:


ORTEGA, ET AL. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:14!00719

MDL No. 2327 ! IN RE: ETHICON, INC., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTSLIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Julia Geel, et al.; Sharon Miller, et al.; Felicita Torres, et al.;Denise Bragg, et al.; Mary Nell Evans, et al.; and Judy Locke, et al., to transfer of their respectivefollowing actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia:


GEEL, ET AL. v. ETHICON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14!01397MILLER, ET AL. v. ETHICON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14!01403

- 24 -



TORRES, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00743


BRAGG, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:14!00719


EVANS, ET AL. v. ETHICON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!03062

Southern District of Texas

LOCKE, ET AL. v. ETHICON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14!02648

MDL No. 2360 - IN RE: SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. (SAIC) BACKUP TAPE DATA THEFT LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Leidos, Inc., to reopen MDL No. 2360 and to transfer the followingaction to the United States District Court for the District of District of Columbia:

Eastern District of California

FERNANDEZ v. LEIDOS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14!02247

MDL No. 2419 - IN RE: NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC.,PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of defendants Anonymous Sports Medicine Center; Anonymous SurgeryCenter; Anonymous M.D.; Anonymous Pain Clinic; Anonymous M.D. 1; Anonymous M.D. 2;and Anonymous Health Care Provider No. 1 to transfer of their respective following actions to theUnited States District Court for the District of Massachusetts:

Northern District of Indiana

HANCOCK, ET AL. v. UNIFIRST CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01770


BIRGE, ET AL. v. UNIFIRST CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01203GRIGGS v. UNIFIRST CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00112

- 25 -


MDL No. 2428 ! IN RE: FRESENIUS GRANUFLO/NATURALYTE DIALYSATEPRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Vanessa H. Moore; The State of Louisiana; and Carol Cook, etal., and defendants Muskogee Regional Medical Center, LLC, et al.; HHS Hospitals, Inc., d/b/aHillcrest Medical Center, et al.; and Renal Treatment Centers-West, Inc., to transfer of theirrespective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts:

Southern District of Alabama

MOORE v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00381

Middle District of Louisiana

THE STATE OF LOUISIANA v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS,INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00490

Western District of Oklahoma

COOK, ET AL. v. FRESENIUS USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:14!01005

MDL No. 2440 ! IN RE: COOK MEDICAL, INC., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEMPRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Joyce L. Mitchell, et al., to transfer of the following action to theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia:


MITCHELL, ET AL. v. COVIDIEN PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14!00636

MDL No. 2493 ! IN RE: MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., TELEPHONECONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA) LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Todd C. Bank to transfer of the following action to the UnitedStates District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia:


BANK v. ALLIANCE SECURITY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!04410

- 26 -


MDL No. 2543 ! IN RE: GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION SWITCH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Alejandro Alers, Sr., and Taunia Green, et al., to transfer of theAlers and Green actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,and motion of defendant General Motors LLC to transfer the Precht and Frank actions to theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York:


ALERS, SR. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 2:14!07258


PRECHT v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:14!20971FRANK v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 1:14!21652


GREEN, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!00107

MDL No. 2557 ! IN RE: AUTO BODY SHOP ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Crawford's Auto Center, Inc., and State of Louisiana, et al., anddefendants The Progressive Corporation, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions tothe United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida:


CRAWFORD'S AUTO CENTER, INC. v. STATE FARM MUTUALAUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!03146

Middle District of Louisiana

STATE OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTYCOMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00550

- 27 -


RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(a) Schedule. The Panel shall schedule sessions for oral argument and consideration of othermatters as desirable or necessary. The Chair shall determine the time, place and agenda for each hearingsession. The Clerk of the Panel shall give appropriate notice to counsel for all parties. The Panel maycontinue its consideration of any scheduled matters.

(b) Oral Argument Statement. Any party affected by a motion may file a separate statementsetting forth reasons why oral argument should, or need not, be heard. Such statements shall be captioned"Reasons Why Oral Argument Should [Need Not] Be Heard" and shall be limited to 2 pages.

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument.The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oralargument.

(c) Hearing Session. The Panel shall not consider transfer or remand of any action pending in afederal district court when any party timely opposes such transfer or remand without first holding a hearingsession for the presentation of oral argument. The Panel may dispense with oral argument if it determinesthat:

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or(ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would

not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration,upon the basis of the pleadings.

(d) Notification of Oral Argument. The Panel shall promptly notify counsel of those mattersin which oral argument is scheduled, as well as those matters that the Panel will consider on the pleadings.The Clerk of the Panel shall require counsel to file and serve notice of their intent to either make or waiveoral argument. Failure to do so shall be deemed a waiver of oral argument. If counsel does not attend oralargument, the matter shall not be rescheduled and that party's position shall be treated as submitted fordecision on the basis of the pleadings filed.

(i) Absent Panel approval and for good cause shown, only those parties to actions whohave filed a motion or written response to a motion or order shall be permitted topresent oral argument.

(ii) The Panel will not receive oral testimony except upon notice, motion and an orderexpressly providing for it.

(e) Duty to Confer. Counsel in an action set for oral argument shall confer separately prior to thatargument for the purpose of organizing their arguments and selecting representatives to present all viewswithout duplication. Oral argument is a means for counsel to emphasize the key points of their arguments,and to update the Panel on any events since the conclusion of briefing.

(f) Time Limit for Oral Argument. Barring exceptional circumstances, the Panel shall allot amaximum of 20 minutes for oral argument in each matter. The time shall be divided among those withvarying viewpoints. Counsel for the moving party or parties shall generally be heard first.


UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT … · case mdl no. 1932 document 223 filed 10/22/14...

Documents

Transcript of UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT … · case mdl no. 1932 document 223 filed 10/22/14...