United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)

for the Kyrgyz Republic2012-2016

Bishkek, March 2011

United Nationsin the Kyrgyz Republic

The Governmentof the Kyrgyz Republic

United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

Executive Summary

Section I: Introduction

Section II: UNDAF Results

Pillar 1: Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance and Human Rights

Pillar 2: Social Inclusion and Equity

Pillar 3: Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction

Section III: Indicative Resource Requirements

Section IV: Implementation

Section V: Monitoring and Evaluation

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Annexes

Annex A: UNDAF Results Matrix

Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance and Human Rights

Social Inclusion and Equity

Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction

Annex B: UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar

2

3

5

6

8

10

12

12

13

14

15

15

15

19

23

29

Table of Contents

2United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

The United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) is the result of an ongoing consultative process intended to analyze how the United Nations can most effectively respond to the Kyrgyz Republic’s national priorities and needs in a transitional context that has been affected by conflict. It is guided by the goals and targets of the Mil-lennium Declaration, which has been endorsed by the Government and national programmes/plans, and by other rel-evant documents, including strategic addresses by the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Government Programme approved by Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic in December 2010, Action Plan “Economy and Security” to implement the Program of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic endorsed by the Government in Janu-ary 2011. The UNDAF translates these into a common operational framework for development activities upon which individual United Nations organizations will formulate their actions for the period 2012-2016.

Peace and stability toward sustainable development represents the cornerstone for the UNDAF; under this over-arching goal, three inter-related areas of cooperation have emerged as particularly critical for United Nations support to the people and Government of the Kyrgyz Republic during this five-year period: (1) Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance, and Human Rights, including deepening State-building, security and justice for all; (2) Social Inclusion and Equity, encompassing issues of social protection, food security, education and health; and (3) Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction, with particular attention to women and youth, as well as to vulnerable groups and disaster-prone communities. In all three, the United Nations Country Team of-fers comparative advantages with regard to achieving further tangible progress toward the Millennium Development Goals, drawing on its values, successful global knowledge base, best practices and lessons learnt; its strong normative mandate and track record in the Kyrgyz Republic; its neutrality; and its ability to encourage efficient coordination and facilitate accountability among donors.

Executive Summary

3United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

Every person in the Kyrgyz Republic deserves a life free from poverty and from fear, conducted in security and dignity. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of people in the coun-try have yet to realise such rights or to build upon equitable opportunities to fully develop their human potential. Yet the impact will be devastating if the Kyrgyz Republic falters in its nation building; the country can be rendered even more vulnerable to the divisiveness and social instability that have characterized its recent years.

Since its independence in 1991, the Kyrgyz Republic has struggled to attain lasting democracy and civic freedom. Moreover, since 2005, insecurity and violence have been recurrent, arising from the weakness of post-independence political institutions, inter-regional tensions over public re-source allocations, among others, and inter-ethnic conflict. Elections for Parliament in 2007 and President in 2009 were found deficient by international observers and citizens alike, leading to widespread public dissatisfaction. A concentra-tion of power in the presidential administrative apparatus weakened Ministries, and thus Government checks and bal-ances. This culminated in a popular overthrow of the regime in April 2010, as well as significant inter-ethnic conflict the following June, that highlight the need for reconciliation and cohesion to be addressed and firmly embedded in all gover-nance approaches in the interests of national stability. Hu-man security remains fragile, with chronic vulnerabilities not only to conflict between communities and individuals, but also to poverty, undernutrition, unsustainable livelihoods, unfulfilled human rights, poor health, and recurrent natural disasters.

Peace and stability toward sustainable development thus rep-resents the cornerstone for this United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF). The UNDAF formulates a common strategic plan for the United Nations Country Team in the Kyrgyz Republic for 2012-2016, in support of na-tional development, the global Millennium Declaration and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to reduce pov-erty. But peace and stability toward sustainable development, in its broadest sense, represents far more than the absence of conflict: It demands that the United Nations Country Team help the people of the Kyrgyz Republic – of whom more than two-thirds live in rural areas – to develop the building blocks of sustainable livelihoods; to develop a national infrastruc-ture that allows the society and the Government to resolve conflicts internally and with their own skills, institutions and resources; to address fundamental social inequities and expand access to quality education, health care and other basic social services; and to achieve gender equality, human

rights and youth development that will underpin long-term sustainable and peaceful development of the society. While this will require a breadth and depth of resources and com-mitment unprecedented among public administrations, in so doing, the Kyrgyz Republic could truly become a model for successful peace-building and development.

This is daunting in a country such as the Kyrgyz Republic, where rural dwellers, women and youth remain especially at risk of poverty despite the country’s past successes in reduc-ing overall poverty. Many of the nation’s 5.2 million people are still severely challenged in terms of human development, subject to a challenged social safety net and dependent on a fast-depleting natural resource base as well as susceptible to constant natural disasters such as earthquakes, landslides, mudflows and floods. Lack of employment opportunities represents a particularly serious obstacle: Women’s share in the economically active population is steadily declining, with higher levels of unemployment than men and lower salaries as well. Similarly, the Kyrgyz Republic’s youth already face high unemployment, low skills levels and lack of opportuni-ties for participation in society. All these issues represent seri-ous challenges to ensuring peace and stability toward sustain-able development.

Yet the people of the Kyrgyz Republic have high expectations for tangible improvements in their daily lives. The focus must be on allowing the widest possible range of people to have confidence in their future in order for peace and stability to prevail. Relevant strategies for the 20-member United Na-tions Country Team (UNCT)1 will continue to be developed through this “lens” of peace and stability toward sustainable development, within a wider human security context. The Kyrgyz Republic has focused its recent development agenda, detailed in the Country Development Strategy 2009-2011, on four strategic priority pillars: (1) strength-ening of economic potential; (2) governance efficiency; (3) socially oriented development; and (4) environmental safety. Building on this document, and in light of the events of 2010 and the naming of a new Government, a new national devel-opment plan is being formulated as the overarching national strategy for reducing poverty and vulnerability. Priorities for the initial six months, as outlined in a draft of the plan, are: (1) to ensure national unity and civil security, guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of the people; (2) to re-establish State governance throughout the country; and (3) to gradu-ally achieve a turnaround from economic crisis. In turn, mid-term socioeconomic objectives encompass: (1) consolidating inter-ethnic tolerance and public security; (2) ensuring eco-

I. Introduction

1 The United Nations is represented in the Kyrgyz Republic by FAO, ILO, IOM, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIDO, UNODC, UNV, WFP and WHO. Non-resident Agencies include OCHA, IAEA, UNECE, UNEP, UNESCAP, UNESCO, UN WOMEN and UNRCCA.

4United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

nomic development, reducing unemployment and enhanc-ing international economic cooperation; (3) improving State governance; and (4) deepening social development and en-vironmental protection. The draft Concept of Ethnic Policy and Integration, being formulated under the supervision of a key department within the Presidential Office, likewise com-plements these priorities, as does the Law on the Republican Budget for 2011 and Forecasts for 2012-2013.

Despite the post-crisis environment, the UNDAF results from a consultative, comprehensive and dynamic strategic priority-setting process, while providing a framework for future collaboration. High levels of participation and con-sultation have occurred not only within the UNCT, but also in close cooperation with the Interim Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and line Ministries, as well as with the new Government formed after parliamentary elections in October 2010. As part of this process, a Strategic Prioritiza-tion Retreat (SPR) on 18-19 November 2010 built on key national challenges in the Kyrgyz Republic that were high-lighted in the Country Analysis and identified main poten-tial areas of support by United Nations Agencies, Funds and Programmes.

At the SPR, the following three interlinked areas thus were ultimately identified as pillars for priority national devel-opment challenges to be addressed by the United Nations Country Team:

Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance, and Human RightsSocial Inclusion and EquityInclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction

Crosscutting themes of gender equality, youth, human rights, environment and Disaster Risk Reduction have been selected to further underpin interventions in all three pillars and are mainstreamed throughout.

After the UNCT agreed about the definitions and substan-tive context of the three pillars, UNDAF Working Groups were established for each pillar, chaired by UNCT members. The Working Groups, with Government counterparts, have been essential to UNDAF preparations and have functioned as information exchange and discussion fora, further refining draft outcomes and indicators. The finalized UNDAF results matrix was agreed upon with the Government in February 2011 following the meeting with the Prime Minister of the Kyrgyz Republic. At the same time, this framework is a liv-ing document, one flexible enough to respond to the Kyrgyz Republic’s rapidly evolving political, social and economic context.

Overall, the critical importance of consolidating peace and

stability in the Kyrgyz Republic has been highlighted by all stakeholders; achievement of this can be sustained in part through a “One UN” approach on key issues such as energy shortages and food security, linking the UNDAF to peace-building efforts while also delivering development results on the ground balanced with support at the centre2. Indeed, the need for coordinated action is particularly important for a country such as the Kyrgyz Republic, which confronts ex-traordinary constraints and uncertainties despite much prog-ress in implementing complex State-building processes. Also critical is taking into account the importance of youth and women, as well as other crucial groups such as internal mi-grants and persons reintegrating in their communities after internal or external displacement, in maintaining stability. Selection of common United Nations development issues, arising from the wide consultations on the design of the UN-DAF, thus has been determined by the following criteria: (1) impact on peace and stability; (2) impact on social cohesion and regional disparities; (3) magnitude of the issue; (4) align-ment with national priorities; and (5) comparative advantage in addressing root causes, which the United Nations can pro-vide by drawing on its neutrality and strong normative man-date, its successful global knowledge base, and its ability to facilitate efficiency and accountability among donors.

Building on lessons learnt during the last UNDAF cycle, this UNDAF is intended to actively support national priorities; be better targeted and focused; be achievable and inspiring; and, above all, have impact. Overall, therefore, the UNCT goal is swift convergence in planning – designing certain interventions collaboratively and sharing these plans as an integrated whole, allowing the United Nations to be an ac-tive, coordinated and responsive partner with the people and Government of the Kyrgyz Republic.

2 In the Kyrgyz Republic’s highly transitional situation, it is unclear whether the United Nations will be able to fully Deliver as One (DaO) during the UNDAF period, although the UNCT supports the principles of DaO.

5United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

As indicated in Section I, United Nations cooperation in the Kyrgyz Republic for the period 2012-2016 will have the overall objective of underscoring peace and stability for sustainable development, and will not be “business as usual.” Critically, the UNCT will sustain and attempt to increase coordination and complementarity with other development partners to support the Government in implementing UN-DAF priorities.

Foremost among the key UNCT strategies to be pursued is that of fundamentally strengthened capacity development for the country, focused on development outcomes, proper management of human resources, and adequate financial re-sources and tools. With the capacity development paradigm representing the heart of United Nations work, this positions Agencies well vis-à-vis the Government in support of the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the results of the 2007 Triennial Comprehensive Policy Review. This long-term process thus gives tangible expression to the con-cept of national ownership, enabling more informed choices and decisions at both organizational and individual levels while emphasizing the importance of motivation as a driver of change.

Capacity development will be linked with the Kyrgyz Repub-lic’s overall need for addressing inequities through an effective shift toward decentralization. This will offer new opportuni-ties not only in the political landscape, but also the bureau-cratic and institutional landscapes. Decentralization is critical because many of the country’s destabilizing issues – poverty and food insecurity among them – are most pronounced at sub-national level, in the oblasts. Decentralization and an em-phasis on sub-national programming thus can help overcome the divide between the capital, or more privileged areas, and the rest of the country. This also will entail improving the tar-geting of funding, technical assistance, and development and humanitarian aid more generally. Complementarities, ability to “scale up” initiatives, and impact and cost effectiveness also will be taken into account. Considering the post-crisis con-text in the country, the United Nations will ensure that its interventions are conflict-sensitive to avoid negative impacts and maximize positive impacts toward promoting peace and stability.

Communication for Development (C4D) will be given ex-plicit priority as an upstream component of programme development and delivery to ensure success in accelerating progress on the MDGs. Overall, C4D – behaviour change communication, communication for social change, and ad-vocacy communication – is about people, who are the driv-ers of their own development and agents in setting normative

development goals and standards; as such, it can contrib-ute to sustainable change for the benefit of the poorest and most vulnerable in the Kyrgyz Republic, including all ethnic groups, IDPs and youth, women and children who have been directly or indirectly affected by violence. Establishment of a crosscutting, active and effective C4D Working Group will provide an important coordination mechanism for greater UNCT coherence and prioritized support in this area, incor-porating C4D from the outset to diagnose and respond to key issues during the UNDAF cycle.

A more effective and systematic approach to harness the potential of volunteerism also will be accorded special em-phasis, given its similar potential to accelerate achievement of the MDGs. As a result, various forms of volunteerism – including enhanced civic engagement across a wide range of sectors, advocacy, service to others, and self-help – will be leveraged to nurture a strong sense of mutual trust and cohe-sion. In turn, this can significantly promote broad-based na-tional ownership, gender equality, inclusive participation and sustainability. Supporting volunteerism for peace and devel-opment through, for example, assisting the re-generation of social capital and livelihoods during national reconciliation constitutes a particularly important comparative advantage of the UNCT.

At the same time, promoting better distribution of develop-ment benefits to ensure social inclusion and equity is impera-tive, given that inequalities in access to delivery of quality services have been among the root causes of recent political crises. At least in the initial post-crisis phase, however, devel-opment interventions may still need to be supplemented by humanitarian initiatives to obtain sustainable stabilization. Finally, further developing the capacity of the Government in ensuring “statistical literacy” – incorporating strengthened analysis and use of quality data for sound policy decisions – will be crucial for making development plans effective.

These key strategies will be further refined during the UN-DAF implementation through the coordination mechanisms discussed in Section V. Some may require collaborative or joint programming or funding. In all, they are expected to give rise to:

Better balance between policy development and effective delivery Better balance between development of the centre and its institutions, and the districtsClear geographic focus on rural or more vulnerable areas

II. UNDAF Results

6United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

Increasing empowerment of actors in the Kyrgyz Republic, including youth, women, non-Government and civil society organisations, to lead the processIncreasing commitment to social inclusion, particularly for youth, women and vulnerable groupsImproved analytical capacity and better ability to design and target social safety net interventions to ensure more effective and efficient use of resourcesStronger focus on UNDAF monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

The development outcomes to be achieved by the United Na-tions in the Kyrgyz Republic UNDAF 2012-2016 are briefly described below. The complete Results and Resources Frame-work is detailed in Annex I.

The Kyrgyz Republic’s vulnerability to conflict is rooted in weak governance and the State’s inability to secure a suffi-ciently inclusive political process and provide cost-effective services. This includes the capacity to rule by law, ensure secu-rity, and protect and respond to rights for men, women, chil-dren and youth, as well as specific vulnerable groups. While some progress has been made, gaps remain in civil and po-litical, as well as economic, labour, social and cultural rights; however, the country has formally expressed support for these rights through its ratification of some 50 United Nations hu-man rights treaties and all ILO Core Conventions, even as implementation requires strengthening. At the same time, the maturity of the system to convey the voice of the people through social dialogue requires further development.

Outcome 1: A national infrastructure for peace (at local, regional and national levels), involving gov-ernment, civil society, communities and individuals, effectively prevents violent conflict and engages in peace-building

Outcome 2: By the end of 2016, the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic fulfills key recommendations of the Universal Periodic Review, Treaty Bodies and Special Procedures, as well as other obligations un-der human rights laws and treaties, to ensure better protection of human rights.

Outcome 3: By 2016, national and local authorities apply rule of law and civic engagement principles in provision of services, with active participation of civil society

National Priorities: Strengthen unity of the nation and ensure public security; increase efficiency and responsibility of State governance

Relevant MDGs:MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hungerMDG 2: Achieve universal primary educationMDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower womenMDG 4: Reduce child mortalityMDG 5: Improve maternal healthMDG 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseasesMDG 7: Ensure environmental sustainabilityMDG 8: Develop a global partnership for development

Pillar 1: Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance, and Human Rights

The impact of the 2010 Constitution on governance could be significant, with the Government headed by a Prime Minis-ter answerable to Parliament and the concentration of pow-er in the hands of the President reduced. Strong assistance to Parliament and its committees, the Government and its structures, and civil servants alike will be needed to support effective democratic governance. Despite constitutional and institutional reform of the judiciary, such reform has yet to be systematized, so that independence of this key branch of Government continues to represent a major concern.

Addressing these issues will help to mitigate numerous de-velopment challenges, especially at sub-national level, that threaten peace and stability: a limited pool of skilled and trained human resources, particularly among youth; under-developed democratic systems, processes, attitudes and be-haviors; and lack of a clear legal and regulatory framework. In turn, all this ultimately has resulted in lack of a clear vision for State institutions; weak capacity for planning and unreliable service delivery; and need for stronger interaction among the organs of sovereignty. Public confidence in institutions re-

7United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

quires further strengthening, as do mechanisms for external oversight and budget execution.

Lastly, the participation of women, youth, minorities and vulnerable groups in politics and decision making, including peace-building efforts, has been insufficient. Critically, a sys-temic approach is necessary to assign responsibility for gen-der mainstreaming within public administration and local self-government bodies. At the same time, the new Constitu-tion offers encouragement in this area through its chapter on human rights, special article on equal rights and opportuni-ties of men and women, and guarantees of gender equality in political participation and social life.

Critical to UNCT initiatives during the UNDAF cycle will be the proactive, participatory and inclusive concept of In-frastructure for Peace, aiming at strengthening national pro-cesses, policies and institutions that can improve the ability of the society to prevent and manage conflicts and promote so-cial cohesion. This involves developing mechanisms for coop-eration among all relevant stakeholders in peace-building by promoting cooperative problem solving for conflicts, as well as strengthening communities, civil society and Government institutions to resolve conflicts internally and with their own skills, institutions and resources.

This will build on a number of initiatives already under way (e.g., Youth Friendly Centers, Oblast Advisory Committees, Women Peace Committees and Water Use Associations) that can serve as important elements for such an infrastructure. The support to peace committees and oblast-level conflict resolution mechanisms will help to bridge political divides and transform conflicts, with an emphasis on women and youth. Principles of mediation and arbitration, along with peace education, will be prioritized. Other key groups in such peace processes may include water associations, thereby ensuring equitable distribution of water among communities and mitigating a potent source of conflict. Dialogue will be encouraged between State institutions and civil society re-garding the design and implementation of policies related to conflict prevention, while Government and civil society ca-pacities will be built to better monitor and respond to violent conflict. Media development interventions will be under-taken aiming at changing knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to tolerance and human rights.

Overall, under this UNDAF pillar it will be imperative to en-sure that real and sustainable capacity development of people in the Kyrgyz Republic takes place in a wide range of gover-nance areas, including the security and justice sectors, as well as in gender-focused analysis, planning and budgeting. The United Nations is committed to building partnerships in ex-isting structures that can clarify roles and responsibilities for more effective service delivery. Importance will be given to not only skills building for the people, but also to changing institutional attitudes and behaviors to emphasize the values and principles of democratic institutions. A decentralized government system with a sound institutional framework re-specting human rights can significantly reinforce peace and

stability through enhancing local participation in Govern-ment decision-making processes.

Thus, the United Nations also looks to assist in creating social cohesion not only “horizontally” – between various social groups – but also “vertically,” between the Government and people, making Government more inclusive. For example, re-newed support to strengthening of the national Ombudsman Institution, undertaken jointly by OHCHR, UNDP, UNH-CR, UNICEF and UN Women, is expected to enhance rule of law and promote human rights. Continuing support to ensure fulfillment of 168 key recommendations of the 2010 UPR, of which the Government has accepted 152, also will be critical to strengthening the national human rights record. In addition, active implementation of an effective National Youth Policy or implementation of gender-sensitive early warning mechanisms for prevention and management of conflicts can further support the consolidation of peace and stability. Safeguarding the rights of internal migrants, asylum seekers, refugees and stateless persons and promoting their legal, economic and social integration will also support social cohesion. Special attention will be paid to creating an accessi-ble, functioning justice system for all children in contact with the law, including child victims, witnesses and offenders. In addition, the outreach of national institutions for the elimi-nation of the worst forms of child labour will be increased through effective upscaling of available tools and models of intervention as well as capacity building of partners.

The UNCT as a whole has several comparative advantages in supporting the Kyrgyz Republic to effectively address the component of political maturity, dialogue and tolerance, as well as that of governance and other disparities. In particular, the United Nations’ longstanding presence and engagement throughout the country, paired with the breadth and depth of expertise and capacity across all sectors, and particularly in democratic governance, peace-building and human rights, can serve the country well. Thus, the UNCT is collectively well-placed to address the strengthening of State institutions and their practices and to support mechanisms for national unity and stability. This will, however, require coherent, par-ticipatory planning, effective implementation, and consis-tent, proactive communication.

National partners are expected to include, among others, key Ministries and Government agencies, particularly the Min-istry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Youth Affairs, Ministry of Justice, National Statistical Committee. This also will include the President’s Office, the Government’s Office, Parliament and its Committees, the Central Electoral Commission, the Supreme Court and other courts of the national justice system, the State Agency of Execution of Punishment, the General Prosecutor Office, the State Agency for Local Self-Governance, and the Ombudsman Office. Also included will be national non-Government and civil society organizations, the media, the private sector, the National Confederation of Employers, and the Federation of Trade Unions. Internation-al partners will include the donor community, international non-Government organizations.

8United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

Outcome 1: By 2016, vulnerable groups benefit from improved social protection, namely:

Food security; MCH/RH services;Nutrition; Education, STI/HIV/TB; Social protection services and benefits

National Priorities: Develop the social sector; ensure social obligations

Relevant MDGs:MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hungerMDG 2: Achieve universal primary educationMDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower womenMDG 4: Reduce child mortalityMDG 5: Improve maternal healthMDG 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseasesMDG 7: Ensure environmental sustainabilityMDG 8: Develop a global partnership for develop-ment

Pillar 2: Social Inclusion and Equity

Attainment of the highest standard of education, health, nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene, and social welfare services are fundamental rights. Yet although many of the Kyrgyz Republic’s key human development indicators have improved since independence, many remain unacceptably high, particularly with regard to under-5 and maternal mor-tality. Chronic undernutrition among children and women, resulting from food insecurity, inadequate caring practices, and health and sanitation environments, likewise is disturb-ingly prevalent. All this highlights not only the inhibiting of these rights but also the consolidation of peace and stability for sustainable development. The April and June 2010 events highlight the need to strengthen access to and delivery of ba-sic services in local communities as a way of alleviating social tensions, as well as underscored the lack of comprehensive quality services for victims of violence. Significant dispari-ties exist between regions and between rural and urban areas, even as the capacity of local governments to deliver services and provide the necessary infrastructure is severely limited. Gender inequality in social services remains a barrier to social justice and development, while youth are often confronted with adult issues but have limited access to resources.

For improved social inclusion and equity, three interlinked strategic challenges will need to be addressed: (1) access and availability; (2) eroded infrastructure; and (3) insufficient

skills among service providers. Economic barriers primar-ily relate to costs and affordability, while many geographical barriers also exist, with some linked to continuing insecurity. Legal barriers – for example, restrictions to documentation and registration, as well as corruption – also limit access. Administrative barriers encompass a need for strengthened attention to vulnerable groups and rural areas, as well as in-sufficient budget allocations. The role of non-State actors in the sector remains underdeveloped.

Challenges in achieving quality education are particularly crucial given the Kyrgyz Republic’s overwhelmingly young population. Key issues here include not only a need for im-proved teacher credentials and infrastructure, but also signifi-cantly better student performance standards. Regional imbal-ances remain pronounced, and a large percentage of young people do not continue to secondary education; poverty is a key reason for dropping out of school. Skills mismatches with the labour market must be remedied.

For its part, the health sector confronts important and com-plex challenges to improve health outcomes, including reach-ing out to the entire population with stronger community mobilization, given that about 10 percent of the population still does not have access to health care services. Both updat-ing of delivery methods and addressing the needs for decen-tralized management and more appropriate infrastructure are priorities.

Despite considerable progress in maternal health, the country retains one of the highest Maternal Mortality Ratios among former Soviet republics – a rate that appears to be increasing. The global economic and food crises threaten to exacerbate an already serious problem of anaemia and micronutrient de-ficiencies among children in the Kyrgyz Republic. Stunting is a serious public health problem, with a national prevalence of 13.7 percent and particularly high prevalence in certain re-gions. Water-borne illnesses also remain a major issue, arising from poor water quality and intermittent supply a particu-lar need exists to strengthen the roles of women and youth role in health-related decision-making processes as well as in health management and policymaking.

The HIV epidemic in the Kyrgyz Republic, as in other East-ern European and Central Asian countries, is the fastest-growing epidemic in the world. Driven by Injecting Drug Use (IDU), high rates of HIV prevalence can be observed among key populations at higher risk to HIV exposure; although na-tional HIV prevalence is low, estimated at 0.1 percent, among IDU the prevalence rate is 14.3 percent, according to sentinel surveillance data for 2009, and 7 percent among prisoners. Some 3 in 4 new infections during recent years have occurred in people younger than age 30. A tuberculosis epidemic, com-pounded by the growing threat of multi-drug resistant tuber-culosis, also presents a major challenge to the country’s health

9United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

care system and to economic development. Despite impres-sive gains, deviation from international treatment standards, interruptions in drug supply, poor patient compliance with treatment, and poor infection control have all contributed to this serious problem.

Critically, the design and set-up of a comprehensive food secu-rity monitoring system is essential to ensure that widespread overall food security needs and shocks are monitored so that programmes are relevant and incorporated into policies. About 1.4 million people – one-third of the country – are food-insecure, including 15 percent severely food-insecure; vulnerable groups including the elderly, informal migrants, residents of State institutions, the homeless, the sick and in-firm, children living in large households, and those suffering from extreme poverty remain disproportionately affected, with more affected from frequent natural disasters and low resilience due to lack of livelihood opportunities. At the same time, stunting, micronutrient deficiency and anaemia also re-main critical nutrition issues that must be urgently addressed. The UNCT will use targeted food security programmes as invaluable components to mitigate natural disasters, improve access to education, rebuild or create agricultural infrastruc-ture, create or bolster livelihoods, and reinforce social safety nets for the most vulnerable, all as part of peace-building.

Lastly, few social protection services are available and func-tioning to address the needs of the poorest and most vulner-able, including widows, orphans, people with disabilities and others. Key issues that the UNCT will help to address include a need for increased fair access; the lack of harmonization of benefits; low contribution rate, as a result of the large infor-mal economy; and unclear definitions of the poverty line and subsistence minimum. While a formal policy framework on social services is in place in the Kyrgyz Republic, implementation mechanisms are in-sufficient to ensure pro-poor and pro-vulnerable outcomes. United Nations concerns under this pillar thus will focus on strengthening policies and supporting the translation of them into delivery of integrated, quality education, health, nutrition, water/sanitation and social protection services, including occupational health and safety, at the oblast, com-munity and family levels, particularly in rural areas. Access, quality, utilization and equity of services will be emphasized, as will inter-sectoral collaboration, particularly at middle management level. Capacity development will include areas such as standardization of practices, improvement of plan-ning and budgeting, and human resource management, with a systematic approach to monitoring and evaluation institu-tionalized.

The UNCT’s comparative advantages lie largely in its core mandate of basic social services; its strong links to global expertise and international best practices; its commitment

to help the Government achieve national goals; and its re-lationship of trust with relevant Ministries. United Nations support on mainstreaming gender into the design, planning, monitoring and evaluation of social policies, and on assisting gender-based analyses and data collection, will be critical.

Partners in this area are expected to include key Ministries and Government agencies, particularly the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of So-cial Protection of Population, Ministry of Emergency Situa-tions, Ministry of Interior, Parliament and its Committees, the court system, Country Multi-Sectoral Coordination Committee, Mandatory Health Insurance Fund under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic, Kyrgyz Academy of Education, State Agency for Local Self-Governance, Nation-al Physiology Centre, National AIDS Centre, and regional HIV, tuberculosis and health institutions. Non-Government organizations, the private sector and associations such as teachers’ trade unions, academic institutions, the media, HIV most-at-risk population networks and associations, and local authorities and communities also will be engaged.

International partners will encompass the donor community and international non-Government organizations, including World Bank, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, USAID, Kf W Development Bank, Medicins sans Frontieres, International Committee of the Red Cross, Help Age International, Save the Children (UK), Danish Refugee Council, ACTED, Mercy Corps, Crisis Centre Sezim, Pub-lic Foundation Counterpart-Sheriktesh, Centre for Interna-tional Protection, and Refugee Women Centre.

10United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

Outcome 1: By the end of 2016, population, especially vulnerable groups, benefit from inclusive growth leading to decent and productive employ-ment and improved access to productive natural resources, markets, services and food security

Outcome 2: By end of 2016, sustainable manage-ment of energy, environment and natural resources practices is operationalized

Outcome 3: By 2016, Disaster Risk Management framework in compliance with international stan-dards established and effectively operationalized at national and local levels

National Priorities: Further develop the economy, reduce unemployment, and improve international economic cooperation with strategic partners; develop entrepreneurship and improve the business environment; protect the environment

Relevant MDGs:MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hungerMDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower womenMDG 7: Ensure environmental sustainabilityMDG 8: Develop a global partnership for develop-ment

Pillar 3: Inclusive and Sustainable Growth for Poverty Reduction

Job-rich economic growth is vital to the rights to survival, livelihood, protection and participation. The Kyrgyz Re-public has built up a liberal market economy and has sought international integration through trade and investment, no-tably through membership in the World Trade Organization. Economic growth has helped reduce poverty, but remains marred by serious economic imbalances that leave the man-ufacturing sector very weak; at the same time, the national economy is characterized by low competitiveness and insuf-ficient export potential, in part because of a lack of foreign investment. Remittances from labour migrants, which con-stitute upward of 35 percent of the Kyrgyz Republic’s Gross Domestic Product, have dropped significantly in recent years – by 60 percent between 2008 and 2009 alone – which has further impeded the economic stability of many vulnerable households, and thus, overall poverty reduction. To address these imbalances and stimulate sustainable economic growth, a need exists to diversify the production and export structure and substantially improve economic performance and com-petitiveness of enterprises.

With 32 percent of people still living in poverty and 6 percent

in extreme poverty, it remains clear that profound structural challenges must be addressed. Despite Government attempts to improve targeting of social assistance, levels of social ben-efits among the most vulnerable remain very low. Moreover, the political turmoil in 2010 further damaged already-under-developed infrastructure as well as set back broader economic reform processes.

The rural population, women and youth in particular lack employment opportunities, and overall unemployment and underemployment are rising, with internal and external la-bour migration increasing. Lack of opportunities to create capital also is affecting poverty, as is an absence of access to basic services. Households have reduced expenditures, yet more than 40 percent in 2008 reported borrowing money to meet day-to-day needs. Critically, the informal economy competes with the formal economy for labour, materials and financial resources, representing an estimated 60 percent of total employment – predominantly women – in 2007. A mis-match of labour supply and demand gives rise to the need for the pattern of economic development to change to generate more productive employment and improve labour market outcomes as well as labour productivity. Yet the wider the distribution of the fruits of development and service delivery, the greater will be the likelihood of human security, thereby consolidating peace and stability for sustainable develop-ment.

Meanwhile, since agriculture is the backbone of the rural economy, the combination of limited skills and resources in crop farming, and unregulated livestock grazing, has de-graded an alarming proportion of scarce agricultural land. Despite continued heavy dependence on irrigation, the pre-dominance of outdated, ineffective water management mech-anisms, and inefficient agronomic techniques have resulted in exceptionally inefficient water use. Competition over wa-ter and land has particularly contributed to ethnic tensions, especially in the south. Renewed investment in rural com-munities in particular will be needed to improve equitable access to natural resources, increase agricultural productivity, and stimulate trade between ethnic communities as a basis for lasting peace.

In addition, it will be critical to further enhance coordination for disaster preparedness and response, given that the Kyrgyz Republic suffers about US$35 million in damages each year from natural disasters, building on the high-level Disaster Response Coordination Unit (DRCU) already established between Government, the UNCT and other actors. This is already being supported by a joint UNCT programme, in-volving not only the Government but also the Red Cross, other international organizations, and local and international non-Government organizations. Further strengthening ca-pacities of members of the DRCU, Rapid Emergency Assess-ment and Coordination Teams (REACT) and sector groups,

11United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

along with development of an inter-agency contingency plan, will serve as a platform for ensuring better preparedness and response. Particular attention will be given to establishment of a national platform for Disaster Risk Reduction as a key element of disaster management, with integration into poli-cies, plans and programmes.

At the same time, a culture of preparedness for children and safety in schools has emerged as one of the Disaster Risk Re-duction priorities. Learning and education have proved to be the most effective and sustainable mechanisms for provid-ing necessary Disaster Risk Reduction knowledge to com-munities and protection tools under disaster and emergency situations. Gaps and needs in operations will need to be considered in mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into education, thereby contributing to a strategic shift in mindset from a culture of reaction to a culture of prevention.

The UNCT is particularly well placed to address the complex-ities of poverty reduction in a volatile transitional environ-ment, given the breadth and depth of expertise and capacity it can draw upon at all levels of policymaking and implemen-tation throughout the Kyrgyz Republic. The United Nations has particularly gained credibility based on its ability to help the Government respond swiftly to the 2010 events. Its long-term presence and experience throughout the region is an important asset to consider given the cross-border challenges linked to conflict prevention, migration and natural resource management. The UNCT also may be well-placed to help the Government find both a degree of continuity and consisten-cy for policies, and to orient policies far more strongly toward equity and a focus on the most vulnerable and marginalized. Particular weaknesses in existing policy frameworks lie in the absence of a conflict-sensitive perspective and in insufficient linkages between, e.g., poverty, natural resource management and disaster prevention. Major challenges particularly lie in the limited awareness of linkages between poverty, the envi-ronment and social unrest.

In support of national policies, United Nations interventions thus will offer a more holistic view of poverty, recognizing en-vironment and disaster risk reduction and management as a key factor and developing a culture of participation at all lev-els. The UNCT can advise on shaping educational content to better reflect the evolving needs of the labour market, as well as assist the development of programmes on youth employ-ment and entrepreneurship and a national jobs information portal. Further, it can support the revision of bilateral agree-ments on labour migrants, with a view to fostering a more constructive approach to building skills and utilizing experi-ence and financial resources to develop the Kyrgyz Repub-lic. The UNCT also will focus on support to equitably pro-mote diversified rural livelihoods and better farming, along with pro-poor financial services, through improved policies, systems, productivity and markets. It likewise will support

strengthened community-based natural resource manage-ment, labour-intensive public works and development of a culture of resilience for response to disaster risks.

National partners in this area are expected to include, among others, key Ministries and Government agencies such as the Ministry of Economic Regulation, Ministry of Labour, Employment and Migration, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Social Protection of Population, Ministry of Emergency Situations, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Culture and Information, Ministry of Education, President’s Office, Parliament and its Commit-tees, State Agency for Local Self-Governance, Kyrgyz Acad-emy of Education, National Statistical Committee, Academy of Sciences, national water authorities, State Agency on En-vironment Protection and Forestry, State Agency for Quake Proof Construction, Renewable Energy Sources Director-ate, National Committee on Climate Change, and National Confederation of Employers and the Federation of Trade Unions.

Also involved will be local and regional authorities, com-munities, the private sector, national and international non-Government organizations, trade unions and employers organizations, and academic institutions. These will include the Legal Clinic Adilet, Centre for International Protection, Crisis Centre Sezim and Central Asian Crafts Support As-sociation Resource Centre.

12United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

The estimated financial resources required by the UNCT for its contribution to the achievement of each UNDAF Out-come are presented in the UNDAF Results Matrices in An-nex A. These contributions include (1) the financial alloca-tions by each participating United Nations organization, or direct resources; and (2) resources that organizations expect to mobilize during the UNDAF cycle in addition to their di-rect resources. The figures, while only indicative, are as accu-rate as possible at the time of the UNDAF drafting. Resource commitments will continue to be made only in Agency pro-gramme and project documents, according to the procedures and approval mechanisms of each Agency. The UNDAF budget will be reviewed and updated annually to reflect the different cycles of specialized and non-resident Agencies.

Throughout implementation of the UNDAF, the UNCT will focus on the most vulnerable groups in society, with explicit provisions for ensuring their active and effective participation in decision making as a key to fortifying peace and stability. Moreover, as noted above, to contribute to the reduction of rural-urban and regional disparities that underlie much of the poverty and conflict in the Kyrgyz Republic, the United Na-tions will target poor rural areas and specific impoverished groups. Particular importance will be given to effective links between the State and civil society.

The UNCT and United Nations Resident Coordinator will be responsible for the effectiveness of United Nations activi-ties, especially in cases where resources are combined. These arrangements will support progress toward the use of nation-al systems for implementation, management and monitoring, based on internationally recognized standards and good prac-tices. The UNCT will discuss and determine which outputs can be implemented within Joint Programmes.

Technical Working Groups will meet regularly and will serve as the main mechanism for implementing and monitoring the UNDAF, under the oversight of the UNCT [see also Section VI]. Individual Working Group workplans on collaborative activities will be developed with clear goals and objectives, to be integrated into the Annual Report and Workplan of the Resident Coordinator. Regional cooperation also will be sup-ported and encouraged with the Government, particularly in discussions on commitments to international treaties and United Nations instruments.

A number of Thematic Working Groups already contrib-ute to integration between the United Nations Agencies in

The total anticipated resources to be mobilised in support of UNDAF strategies3 in the Kyrgyz Republic amounts to approximately US$ 186,099,262 million over a five-year pe-riod. About 27 percent of the total resources will be spent within the pillar of Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democrat-ic Governance, and Human Rights ($50 954 937 million); 39 percent on Social Inclusion and Equity ($71,883,200 mil-lion); and 34 percent on Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction ($63,261,125 million). This reflects both national development needs and UNCT priori-ties in the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as provides for aligning United Nations cooperation with overall development assis-tance.

key thematic and crosscutting areas such as Gender Equal-ity, Youth, and HIV/AIDS. These will continue to operate as appropriate, encouraging improved coordination through enhanced information exchange, as well as joint planning and decision making.

Provisions of the UNDAF will be implemented through the Country Cooperation Frameworks and Country Pro-grammes agreed to by partner organizations in the Kyrgyz Re-public. Selection and definition of individual Agencies’ goals, outcomes and strategies will be consistent with the UNDAF. Individual Country Programmes and project documents also will specify how they contribute to UNDAF objectives and cooperation strategies.

As part of the overall United Nations commitment to encour-age national programme management and implementation, the Executive Committee of the global United Nations De-velopment Group (UNDP, UNICEF, UNFPA, WFP) will employ a Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfers (HACT) to gradually increase the use of Government systems in dis-bursing and reporting of funds through Implementing Part-ners, as well as to reduce administration costs. Along with UNICEF and UNFPA that are using a FACE (Funding Au-thorization and Certificate of Expenditure) Form, UNDP will also apply HACT modality that became a Principal Recipient of the Grants of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM). The previous HACT deadline for all stages of implementation has been postponed until 2012 due to the political situation in the Kyrgyz Repub-lic at the time of UNDAF formulation. Meanwhile further steps will be undertaken to integrate HACT into country programming.

III. Indicative Resource Requirements

IV. Implementation

3 This total does not encompass special initiatives outside the UNDAF.

13United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

A set of objectively verifiable and repeatable key performance indicators is essential for monitoring, evaluating and reporting on achievement. Key indicators, accompanied by baselines and targets, have been formulated for each Outcome under each of the three pillars of cooperation. To refine baselines and further refine programme strategies, several surveys will be undertaken during the UNDAF cycle. [See the Results Matrices in Annex A for comprehensive monitoring and evaluation indicators to be used. A Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar, contained in Annex B, provides a tentative schedule of all major monitoring and evaluation activities.]

At the same time, because development is a process, the UNDAF may have to be adapted to respond to changes in the Kyrgyz Republic’s economic, political or social situations. The UNCT will establish three UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Groups to provide continuous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms specifically for the three pillars, relying on a Results-Based Management approach.

Each UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Group will meet bi-annually and produce brief bi-annual reports on progress in implementation as well as opportunities and constraints still faced. Government and partner representatives will be invited once every six months to provide strategic guidance. This overall monitoring and evaluation plan will particularly show its value during UNDAF Annual Review Meetings, which will serve as the basis for tracking and reporting on UNCT performance. Annual Reviews will validate

conclusions, including lessons learnt and best practices, which should feed into policy advocacy and preparation of new Annual Work Plans. The Annual Reviews also may provide important inputs for Annual Reports for individual Agencies, the Resident Coordinator and donors, as well as data and analysis for the final UNDAF Evaluation, and may reflect on issues such as development effectiveness and joint resource mobilization.

A joint mid-term evaluation by the Government, UNCT and other partners will be conducted at the midpoint of the UNDAF cycle, synchronized as much as possible with respective Agencies’ mid-term Country Programme reviews. This will be undertaken with the objective of obtaining substantive feedback on progress toward stated outcomes for each pillar, under the overarching goal of peace and stability for sustainable development. It will focus on (1) whether the UNDAF has made the best use of the United Nations’ comparative advantages in the Kyrgyz Republic; (2) the coherence of the Agencies’ contribution toward achieving national priorities; (3) whether the UNDAF has helped achieve the selected priorities in the national development framework; and (4) impact of capacity development initiatives. In all, this will provide the opportunity for any mid-course adjustments to ensure that United Nations efforts 2012-2016 remain focused on the Kyrgyz Republic’s national priorities. In addition, achievements, lessons learnt and best practices will be disseminated, as will constraints encountered, to inform the design of the next UNDAF.

V. Monitoring and Evaluation

14United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016

Acronyms and AbbreviationsAIDSCACBOCDSCEDAWCISCLMSCMCCDRRDRCUEFSAFAOGBVGDPGFHIVIAEAIOILOKAEKIHSLSGM&EMESMFAMoAMoCIMoESMoERMoIMoYMDGsMoJMoHMoLEMMSPPNSCNGOOCHAOHCHRUNAIDSUNCTUNDAFUNDPUNECEUNEPUNESCAPUNESCOUNFPAUNHCRUNICEFUNIDOUNODCUNOSATUNRCCAUNVUN WomenWFPWHO

Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromeCountry AnalysisCommunity Based OrganizationsCountry Development StrategyConvention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against WomenCommonwealth of Independent StatesChild Labour Monitoring SystemCountry Multisectoral Coordination CommitteeDisaster Risk ReductionDisaster Risk Coordination UnitEmergency Food Security AssessmentFood and Agriculture OrganizationGender-Based ViolenceGross Domestic ProductGlobal FundHuman Immunodeficiency VirusInternational Atomic Energy AgencyInternational OrganizationsInternational Labour OrganizationKyrgyz Academy of EducationKyrgyzstan Integrated Household SurveyLocal Self GovernmentMonitoring and EvaluationMinistry of Emergency SituationsMinistry of Foreign AffairsMinistry of AgricultureMinistry of Culture and InformationMinistry of Education and ScienceMinistry of Economic RegulationMinistry of InteriorMinistry of YouthMillennium Development GoalsMinistry of JusticeMinistry of HealthMinistry of Labor, Employment, and MigrationMinistry of Social Protection of PopulationNational Statistics CommitteeNon-Government OrganizationOffice for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOffice of the High Commissioner for Human RightsJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDSUnited Nations Country TeamUnited Nations Development Assistance FrameworkUnited Nations Development ProgrammeUnited Nations Economic Commission of EuropeUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeUnited Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the PacificUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationUnited Nations Population FundUnited Nations High Commissioner for RefugeesUnited Nations Children’s FundUnited Nations Industrial Development OrganizationUnited Nations Office on Drugs and CrimeUnited Nations Operational Satellite Applications ProgrammeUnited Nations Regional Centre for Preventive Diplomacy for Central AsiaUnited Nations VolunteersUnited Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of WomenWorld Food ProgrammeWorld Health Organization

15

Mid

-Ter

m N

atio

nal P

rior

ities

(201

1-20

12):

Inte

r-et

hnic

tole

ranc

e and

pub

lic se

curit

y

S

tren

gthe

ning

stat

e gov

erna

nce

UN

DA

F Pi

llar A

:

Pea

ce an

d C

ohes

ion,

Effe

ctiv

e Dem

ocra

tic G

over

nanc

e and

Hum

an R

ight

s

Rel

evan

t MD

Gs:

M

DG

1: E

radi

cate

extr

eme p

over

ty an

d hu

nger

M

DG

5: I

mpr

ove m

ater

nal h

ealth

MD

G 2

: Ach

ieve

uni

vers

al p

rimar

y edu

catio

n

MD

G 6

: Com

bat H

IV/A

IDS,

mal

aria

and

othe

r dise

ases

MD

G 3

: Pro

mot

e gen

der e

qual

ity an

d em

pow

er w

omen

M

DG

7: E

nsur

e env

ironm

enta

l sus

tain

abili

tyM

DG

4: R

educ

e chi

ld m

orta

lity

M

DG

8: D

evel

op a

glob

al p

artn

ersh

ip fo

r dev

elop

men

t

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

Out

com

e 1:

A n

atio

nal i

nfra

-st

ruct

ure f

or p

eace

(a

t loc

al, r

egio

nal

and

natio

nal l

evel

s)

invo

lvin

g go

vern

-m

ent,

civi

l soc

iety

, co

mm

uniti

es

and

indi

vidu

als

effec

tivel

y pre

vent

s vi

olen

t con

flict

and

enga

ges i

n pe

ace

build

ing

% o

f per

sons

who

feel

se

cure

in th

eir a

rea (

indi

-ca

ting r

educ

ed te

nsio

ns

and

impr

oved

secu

rity)

an

d ha

ve co

nfide

nce i

n ap

plic

atio

n of

rule

of l

aw

and

prot

ectio

n of

hum

an

right

s

% o

f per

sons

that

per

ceiv

e K

yrgy

zsta

n as

a to

leran

t so

ciet

y with

resp

ect f

or

dive

rsity

(seg

rega

ted

data

sh

owin

g per

cent

ages

for

diffe

rent

iden

tity g

roup

s)

% o

f per

sons

that

hav

e the

pe

rcep

tion

of g

ood

inte

r-co

mm

unity

coex

isten

ce

and

coop

erat

ion

(e.g

. in

area

s suc

h as

bus

ines

s co

oper

atio

n, ed

ucat

ion,

co

mm

unity

life

etc.)

At l

east

10

% in

crea

se in

pe

rson

s who

feel

secu

re in

th

eir a

rea a

nd h

ave c

on-

fiden

ce in

appl

icat

ion

of

rule

of l

aw an

d pr

otec

tion

of h

uman

righ

ts

At l

east

10%

incr

ease

in

per

sons

that

per

ceiv

e K

yrgy

zsta

n as

a to

leran

t so

ciet

y with

resp

ect f

or

dive

rsity

(seg

rega

ted

data

sh

owin

g per

cent

ages

for

diffe

rent

iden

tity g

roup

s)

At l

east

10%

incr

ease

in

per

sons

that

hav

e the

pe

rcep

tion

of g

ood

inte

r-co

mm

unity

coex

isten

ce

and

coop

erat

ion

(e.g

. in

area

s suc

h as

bus

ines

s co

oper

atio

n, ed

ucat

ion,

co

mm

unity

life

etc.)

Cou

ntry

-wid

e K

AP

surv

ey to

be

cond

ucte

d in

20

11 m

easu

ring

perc

eptio

n of

se

curit

y and

so

cial

cohe

sion.

Qua

ntita

tive K

AP

surv

ey to

mea

sure

atti-

tude

s and

per

cept

ions

of

sam

pled

resp

on-

dent

s (co

untr

y-w

ide,

repr

esen

tativ

e sur

vey)

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

FA, M

oE, M

oI, N

SC, M

oY,

MoJ

, inc

ludi

ng P

resid

ent’s

Offi

ce, R

elig

ious

Pol

icy a

nd P

ublic

Affa

irs O

ffice

und

er

Pres

iden

t’s O

ffice

, PM

’s O

ffice

, Par

liam

ent,

Cen

tral

Ele

ctor

al C

omm

issio

n, S

upre

me

Cou

rt, S

tate

Age

ncy o

f Exe

cutio

n of

Pun

ishm

ent,

Gen

eral

Pro

secu

tor O

ffice

, Dep

art-

men

t for

Eth

nic D

evel

opm

ent,

Stat

e Age

ncy f

or L

ocal

Sel

f-Gov

erna

nce,

Mun

icip

aliti

es:

To ap

ply U

N ru

les an

d sta

ndar

ds on

juve

nile

justi

ce an

d ens

ure a

pplic

ation

of th

e rul

e of

law,

advo

cacy

, nat

ional

dial

ogue

, im

plem

enta

tion

and m

onito

ring,

partn

ersh

ip

build

ing;

deve

lopm

ent a

nd im

plem

enta

tion

of po

licies

inclu

ding

polic

ies ai

med

at

toler

ance

prom

otion

, reco

ncili

ation

and c

onfli

ct pr

even

tion,

revi

sion

of ex

istin

g leg

islat

ion, p

oten

tial o

f int

erna

tiona

l com

mitm

ents

of th

e cou

ntry

in th

e are

a of p

eace

and s

ecurit

y; in

creas

e of m

edia

tion

poten

tial p

artic

ular

ly am

ong w

omen

and y

outh

; de

velop

men

t of e

arly

warn

ing a

nd co

nflict

prev

entio

n m

echan

isms,

raisi

ng aw

aren

ess;

resto

ratio

n of

and a

ccess

to pr

ivate/

com

mer

cial a

nd st

ate e

mpl

oym

ent t

o all

citiz

ens

rega

rdles

s of e

thni

city,

resto

ratio

n of

lost i

dent

ifica

tion

and p

rope

rty do

cum

enta

tion,

im

prov

ed so

cial s

ervi

ces to

the p

opul

ation

, pov

erty

redu

ction

effor

ts, fa

ir pr

osecu

tion

of hu

man

righ

ts vi

olatio

ns.

Cou

rt, O

mbu

dsm

en O

ffice

: Ext

erna

l mon

itorin

g

Don

or co

mm

unity

: Co

ntrib

utin

g to p

eace

and d

evelo

pmen

t and

mod

erni

zed b

orde

r man

agem

ent.

IOs/

NG

Os a

s act

ors f

or p

eace

: Pr

omot

e pea

ce in

itiat

ives a

nd di

plom

atic

peac

e effo

rts; r

each

out t

o com

mun

ities;

m

obili

ze co

mm

uniti

es for

peac

e bui

ldin

g effo

rts; m

ake a

ssessm

ent o

f the

stra

tegic

docu

men

ts; en

surin

g par

ticip

ator

y app

roac

h for

elab

orat

ion of

lega

l bas

is/fra

mew

ork

docu

men

ts, in

volv

emen

t of w

omen

in pe

ace n

etwor

ks m

obili

zatio

n of

com

mun

ities

in ra

ising

awar

eness

and p

rom

otion

of id

eas o

f tole

ranc

e, clo

se m

onito

ring o

f poli

cy

impl

emen

tatio

n at

all l

evels

, poli

cy di

alog

ue; d

ata c

ollect

ion an

d mon

itorin

g, su

ppor

t to

plan

ning

and i

mpl

emen

tatio

n, ca

pacit

y bui

ldin

g, pr

omot

ion of

peac

e dia

logue

su

ppor

ting e

fforts

of th

e aut

horit

ies, p

rom

otin

g pea

ce an

d reco

ncili

ation

at al

l lev

els

thro

ugh

train

ing s

emin

ars,

awar

eness

raisi

ng ac

tiviti

es, P

B pr

ojects

fund

ing a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n, co

mm

unity

mob

iliza

tion,

prov

ision

of h

uman

itaria

n ai

d to t

he m

ost

need

y, pr

omot

ion of

rule

of la

w, in

form

ation

shar

ing.

Med

ia: a

ware

ness

raisi

ng, m

onito

ring.

UN

DP:

US$

12,

200,

000

UN

ICEF

:U

S$ 5

,000

,000

UN

ESC

O:

US$

220

,000

UN

HC

R:

U

S$ 2

,925

,000

OH

CH

R*:

U

S$ 1

,899

,335

WFP

*:

US$

300

,000

UN

V**

: U

S$ 5

32,4

30

UN

Wom

en:

U

S$ 1

,800

,000

OU

TC

OM

E 1

TO

TAL

US$

24,

876,

765

Ann

ex A

: UN

DA

F R

esul

ts M

atri

xU

ND

AF

Res

ults

and

Res

ourc

es F

ram

ewor

k 20

12-2

016:

PEA

CE

AN

D C

OH

ESIO

N, E

FFEC

TIV

E D

EMO

CR

ATIC

GO

VER

NA

NC

E A

ND

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS

16

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

Out

com

e 2:

By th

e end

of 2

016,

th

e Gov

ernm

ent

of K

yrgy

zsta

n fu

lfills

key

reco

m-

men

datio

ns o

f th

e Uni

vers

al

Peri

odic

Rev

iew,

Tr

eaty

Bod

ies a

nd

Spec

ial P

roce

dure

s, an

d ot

her o

blig

a-tio

ns u

nder

the

inte

rnat

iona

l law

an

d tr

eatie

s for

the

bett

er p

rote

ctio

n of

hu

man

righ

ts

# of

com

plai

nts s

ubm

itted

U

N T

reat

y Bod

ies a

nd

Spec

ial P

roce

dure

s rel

ated

to

hum

an ri

ghts

viol

atio

ns

% o

f all

reco

mm

enda

-tio

ns an

d de

cisio

ns o

f UN

Tr

eaty

Bod

ies a

nd S

peci

al

Proc

edur

es im

plem

ente

d

Min

imum

10

indi

vidu

al

com

plai

nts s

ubm

itted

by

per

sons

und

er K

yrgy

z ju

risdi

ctio

n to

UN

Tr

eaty

Bod

ies a

nd S

peci

al

Proc

edur

es

20%

of a

ll re

com

men

-da

tions

and

dec

ision

s im

plem

ente

d

Nat

iona

l bod

y or

mec

hani

sm ta

sked

to

over

see i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

reco

mm

enda

tions

and

deci

sions

is fu

nctio

nal

5 de

cisio

ns

of th

e UN

H

uman

Rig

hts

Com

mitt

ee

on in

divi

dual

ca

ses c

arrie

d ou

t sin

ce 1

995

(sin

ce 1

995

indi

vidu

al

com

mun

icat

ion

beca

me l

egal

)

0 de

cisio

ns

impl

emen

ted

Base

line o

n im

plem

enta

tion

of re

com

men

-da

tion

tba

Mon

itorin

g rep

orts

of

NG

Os;

stat

istic

al

data

from

the j

udic

ial

syst

em; d

ata f

rom

the

OH

CH

R G

enev

a on

the n

umbe

r of r

egis-

tere

d co

mpl

aint

s.

Mon

itorin

g rep

orts

of

OH

CH

R an

d N

GO

s; re

port

s of G

over

n-m

ent a

genc

ies t

o th

e U

N T

reat

y Bod

ies

and

Hum

an R

ight

s C

ounc

il; la

ws a

dopt

ed

in im

plem

enta

tion

of

UN

obs

erva

tions

and

reco

mm

enda

tions

Mon

itorin

g of t

he

natio

nal a

sylu

m

proc

edur

e and

refu

gee

prot

ectio

n sit

uatio

n di

rect

ly b

y UN

HC

R

and

NG

Os.

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies i

nclu

ding

Pre

siden

t’s O

ffice

: Co

ordi

natio

n of

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the r

ecom

men

datio

ns am

ong r

eleva

nt m

inist

ries

and s

tate

agen

cies;

timely

subm

ission

of re

ports

to U

PR, C

EDAW

/follo

w up

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

reco

mm

enda

tions

; ado

ption

of im

plem

enta

tion

mech

anism

; m

onito

ring t

ools

and p

roced

ures

over

impl

emen

tatio

n; po

licy d

evelo

pmen

t and

impl

e-m

enta

tion;

impr

ovem

ent

of th

e leg

islat

ion; p

rom

otion

of h

uman

righ

ts, in

cludi

ng th

e rig

hts o

f refu

gees,

asylu

m-se

eker

s and

stat

eless

perso

ns at

all l

evels

, cap

acity

build

ing;

aw

aren

ess ra

ising

of th

e vul

nera

ble g

roup

s of p

opul

ation

on th

eir ri

ghts

as w

ell as

en

titlem

ents

to va

rious

publ

ic ser

vices

, soc

ial b

enefi

ts an

d assi

stanc

e.mai

nstre

amin

g of

child

labo

ur in

to po

licy d

ocum

ents,

supp

ort i

n in

trodu

ction

of ch

ild la

bour

mon

itorin

g sys

tem (C

LMS)

, cap

acity

deve

lopm

ent,

awar

eness

raisi

ng, s

uppo

rt in

prov

idin

g dire

ct ser

vices

to ch

ildre

n.

IOs/

NG

Os,

Trad

e Uni

ons,

Nat

iona

l Con

fede

ratio

n of

the E

mpl

oyer

s: En

surin

g par

ticip

ator

y app

roac

h for

elab

orat

ion of

repo

rts, m

onito

ring o

f im

ple-

men

tatio

n of

reco

mm

enda

tions

and i

mpl

emen

tatio

n pr

ocess

; pro

visio

n of

expe

rtise

and t

echni

cal s

uppo

rt, ca

pacit

y bui

ldin

g at a

ll lev

els; i

nfor

mat

ion sh

arin

g; ca

pacit

y de

velop

men

t, im

plem

enta

tion

of CL

MS,

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t.

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

FA, O

mbu

dsm

an, M

inist

ry o

f Ju

stice

:Ti

mely

prep

arat

ion an

d coo

rdin

ation

on in

terna

tiona

l com

mitm

ents

in th

e are

a of

hum

an ri

ghts,

inclu

ding

the r

ights

of re

fuge

es, as

ylum

-seek

ers a

nd st

atele

ss pe

rsons

; po

licy d

evelo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n; im

prov

emen

t th

e leg

islat

ion; r

eceivi

ng

com

plai

ns an

d pro

vide

adeq

uate

resp

onse,

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the H

R an

d mon

itorin

g;

mai

nstre

amin

g of c

hild

labo

ur in

to po

licy d

ocum

ents,

supp

ort i

n in

trodu

ction

of ch

ild

labo

ur m

onito

ring s

ystem

(CLM

S), c

apac

ity de

velop

men

t, aw

aren

ess ra

ising

, sup

port

in pr

ovid

ing d

irect

servi

ces to

child

ren.

ING

O/N

GO

: Mon

itorin

g and

impl

emen

tatio

n.

IOs/

NG

Os:

Capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t and

supp

ort t

o im

plem

enta

tion

of U

PR an

d UN

trea

ty bo

dies’

re

com

men

datio

ns re

lated

to pl

aces

of de

tentio

n an

d dru

g con

trol.

Trad

e Uni

ons,

Nat

iona

l Con

fede

ratio

n of

the E

mpl

oyer

s, N

GO

s: ca

pacit

y dev

elopm

ent,

impl

emen

tatio

n of

CLM

S.

Om

buds

man

offi

ce S

upre

me C

ourt

and

cour

ts:

Ensu

re ap

plica

tion

of th

e HR

and R

ule o

f the

Law

UN

OD

C:

U

S$ 2

,250

,000

UN

HC

R:

U

S$ 3

,412

,500

OH

CH

R*:

US$

947

,700

ILO

US$

100

,000

UN

ICEF

:

U

S$ 5

00,0

00

UN

Wom

en:

U

S$ 5

0,00

0

OU

TC

OM

E 2

TO

TAL

US$

7,5

59,5

00

17

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

Out

com

e 3:

By 2

016,

nat

iona

l an

d lo

cal a

utho

ri-

ties a

pply

rule

of

law

and

civi

c en

gage

men

t prin

-ci

ples

in p

rovi

sion

of se

rvic

es w

ith

activ

e par

ticip

atio

n of

civi

l soc

iety

% o

f civ

il so

ciet

y org

aniz

a-tio

ns an

d N

GO

s act

ivel

y an

d le

gally

par

ticip

atin

g in

form

ulat

ion

and

impl

e-m

enta

tion

and

M&

E of

na

tiona

l and

loca

l dev

elop

-m

ent p

olic

ies

1/4

of ci

vil o

rgan

izat

ions

an

d N

GO

s effe

ctiv

ely

and

lega

lly p

artic

ipat

e in

form

ulat

ion

and

impl

e-m

enta

tion

and

M&

E of

nat

iona

l and

loca

l de

velo

pmen

t pol

icie

s

0 ci

vil

orga

niza

tions

an

d N

GO

s pa

rtic

ipat

e eff

ectiv

ely a

nd

lega

lly in

for-

mul

atio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

and

M&

E of

na

tiona

l and

lo

cal d

evel

op-

men

t pol

icie

s

“Tok

tom

” Leg

al d

a-ta

base

; pol

ling s

urve

y re

sults

amon

g civ

il so

ciet

y org

aniz

atio

ns

and

NG

Os.

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly, M

oJ, M

oY, N

ALS

G in

clud

ing

Parli

amen

t and

its C

omm

ittee

s, G

over

nmen

t’s O

ffice

, Pre

siden

t’s O

ffice

: Po

licy d

evelo

pmen

t, co

ordi

natio

n, ad

voca

cy, a

ware

ness

raisi

ng, p

rom

otion

and

supp

ortin

g nat

ional

dial

ogue

; pro

mot

ion an

d enh

ancem

ent o

f rul

e of l

aw, g

ende

r ex

perti

se an

d gen

der r

espon

sive b

udge

ting;

law

draft

ing,

coor

dina

tion,

law

impl

emen

-ta

tion

over

sight

, pro

mot

ion an

d pro

tectio

n of

HR;

insti

tutio

nal c

apac

ity of

nat

ional

sta

keho

lder

s to e

nabl

e the

m to

enga

ge w

ith ci

vil so

ciety

orga

niza

tions

in fo

rmul

ation

an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of na

tiona

l poli

cies;

prom

otion

and e

nhan

cemen

t of r

ule o

f law

th

roug

h ad

ditio

nal l

egisl

ative

and e

xecu

tive m

easu

res;

ensu

ring i

ndivi

dual

resp

onsi-

bilit

y for

crim

inal

offen

ces an

d hum

an ri

ghts

viola

tions

in ac

cord

ance

with

the l

aw;

estab

lishi

ng le

gal b

asis

for en

gage

men

t of c

ivil s

ociet

y in

impr

ovin

g rul

e of l

aw an

d pr

ovisi

on of

serv

ices.

Don

or co

mm

unity

: Co

ntrib

ute t

o the

stre

ngth

enin

g of g

ood g

over

nanc

e at l

ocal

and n

ation

al le

vels

to en

-su

re so

cial j

ustic

e; co

ntrib

ute t

o poli

cy m

akin

g, su

ppor

t poli

cy re

form

s im

plem

enta

tion.

IOs/

NG

Os:

Facil

itate

the p

roces

s of p

rope

r esta

blish

men

t and

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t of t

he pu

blic

auth

oriti

es an

d NG

Os; p

artic

ipat

ion in

law

draft

ing,

polic

y mak

ing;

advo

cacy

and

prom

otion

of pu

blic

awar

eness

; ens

urin

g par

ticip

ation

of w

omen

in de

cision

mak

ing

and b

udge

ting;

supp

ort t

o dev

elopm

ent o

f effi

cient

law

enfor

cemen

t bo

dies,

impl

e-m

enta

tion,

coor

dina

tion

and c

ontin

genc

y pla

nnin

g; su

ppor

t gov

ernm

ent e

fforts

in

impr

ovin

g the

rule

of la

w an

d pro

visio

n of

servi

ces; c

lose m

onito

ring o

f hum

an ri

ghts

situa

tion

and i

nfor

mat

ion sh

arin

g with

the a

utho

rities

; enh

ancem

ent o

f hum

an ri

ghts

awar

eness

amon

g the

popu

latio

n; pr

ovisi

on of

lega

l ser

vices

to en

sure

acces

s to j

ustic

e to

cont

ribut

e to e

labo

ratio

n of

polic

y/re

gula

tory

docu

men

ts.

Med

ia:

Awar

eness

raisi

ng, m

onito

r rul

e of l

aw im

plem

enta

tion,

publ

icize

HR

viola

tions

.

UN

DP:

US$

10,

600,

000

UN

OD

C:

US$

2,0

00,0

00

UN

HC

R:

U

S$ 3

,412

,500

UN

ICEF

:

U

S$ 5

00,0

00

UN

ESC

O:

US$

225

,000

UN

FPA

:U

S$ 1

,500

,000

UN

V**

: U

S$ 2

81,1

72

UN

Wom

en:

U

S$ 3

00,0

00

Cor

rupt

ion

Perc

eptio

n In

dex (

CPI

) ran

king

scor

e

# of

com

plai

nts o

n co

r-ru

ptio

n

Ran

king

scor

e of 1

00 o

r be

tter

in

(CPI

)

# of

com

plai

nts o

n co

r-ru

ptio

n tr

iple

d

164

rank

ing

scor

e in

CPI

20

10

Cor

rupt

ion

base

line s

urve

y to

be c

ondu

cted

in

201

1; su

rvey

w

ill al

so

esta

blish

a ba

selin

e on

tota

l num

ber o

f co

mpl

aint

s

Rat

ing t

hrou

gh C

PI

corr

uptio

n ba

selin

e an

d en

d-lin

e sur

veys

re

sults

; NG

O an

d ci

vil

soci

ety o

rgan

izat

ion

repo

rts

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

incl

udin

g Gov

ernm

ent’s

Offi

ce, P

resid

ent’s

O

ffice

, Jud

icia

ry an

d Pa

rliam

ent:

Impr

ovin

g leg

islat

ion ba

se to

fight

corr

uptio

n, ci

tizen

s’ eng

agem

ent,

creat

ing a

plat

-for

m on

nat

ional

dial

ogue

with

focu

s on

anti-

corr

uptio

n iss

ues.

NG

Os: Ad

voca

cy, e

ngag

emen

t int

o poli

cy an

d pra

ctice

dial

ogue

, rep

resen

ting c

itize

ns fr

om

rem

ote a

reas

.

Med

ia:

Ensu

re tr

ansp

aren

cy an

d rai

sing p

ublic

awar

eness

on pu

blic

asset

s and

othe

r reso

urces

.

18

% o

f per

sons

with

ope

n ac

cess

to cr

edib

le in

form

a-tio

n on

pub

lic p

olic

y m

akin

g

At l

east

50%

of p

opul

a-tio

n w

ith o

pen

acce

ss to

qu

ality

upd

ated

pub

lic

info

rmat

ion

on p

olic

y m

akin

g thr

ough

Inte

rnet

an

d m

obile

pho

ne

Inte

rnet

use

rs

only

hav

e an

acce

ss to

pub

lic

inst

itutio

ns’

web

sites

(40%

of

the p

opul

a-tio

n in

201

0)

Rep

orts

of I

nter

net

and

mob

ile p

hone

se

rvic

e pro

vide

rs,

incl

udin

g Int

erne

t W

orld

s Sta

ts

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent’s

Age

ncie

s, in

clud

ing P

M’s

Offi

ce, P

resid

ent’s

Offi

ce,

Judi

ciar

y and

the P

arlia

men

t Om

buds

man

: M

aint

ain

regu

lar p

ublic

com

mun

icatio

ns an

d get

feedb

ack fr

om ci

tizen

s thr

ough

m

edia

, ICT

tools

and o

ther

com

mun

icatio

n ch

anne

ls.

Civ

il so

ciet

y org

aniz

atio

ns:

Capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t of t

he K

yrgy

z citi

zens

.

Priv

ate S

ecto

r: Br

inin

g in

new

ICT

techn

ologie

s, soft

ware

deve

lopm

ent t

o ens

ure p

ublic

acces

s to

publ

ic in

form

ation

.D

onor

s: su

ppor

t poli

cy re

form

s im

plem

enta

tion.

CIIP

Med

ia: A

ware

ness

raisi

ng an

d adv

ocac

y

OU

TC

OM

E 3

TO

TAL

US$

18,

818,

672

UN

DA

F PI

LLA

R A

TO

TAL

US$

50,

954,

937

19

Mid

-Ter

m N

atio

nal P

rior

ities

(201

1-20

12):

Eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent,

redu

ctio

n of

une

mpl

oym

ent a

nd en

hanc

ing

inte

rnat

iona

l eco

nom

ic co

oper

atio

n

S

ocia

l dev

elop

men

t and

envi

ronm

ent p

rote

ctio

n U

ND

AF

Pilla

r B:

S

ocia

l Inc

lusio

n an

d Eq

uity

Rel

evan

t MD

Gs:

M

DG

1: E

radi

cate

extr

eme p

over

ty an

d hu

nger

MD

G 5

: Im

prov

e mat

erna

l hea

lthM

DG

2: A

chie

ve u

nive

rsal

prim

ary e

duca

tion

MD

G 6

: Com

bat H

IV/A

IDS,

mal

aria

and

othe

r dise

ases

MD

G 3

: Pro

mot

e gen

der e

qual

ity an

d em

pow

er w

omen

MD

G 7

: Ens

ure e

nviro

nmen

tal s

usta

inab

ility

MD

G 4

: Red

uce c

hild

mor

talit

y

M

DG

8: D

evel

op a

glob

al p

artn

ersh

ip fo

r dev

elop

men

t

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

Out

com

e 1:

By 2

016,

vul

ner-

able

gro

ups*

ben

-efi

t fro

m im

prov

ed

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n,

nam

ely: fo

od se

curit

y;

MC

H/R

H

serv

ices

;nu

triti

on;

educ

atio

n,

STI/

HIV

/T

B;

soci

al p

rote

c-tio

n se

rvic

es

and

bene

fits

*indi

cato

rs an

d Co

untry

Pro

-gr

amm

es of

UN

Or

gani

zatio

ns

iden

tify t

he sp

ecific

vu

lnera

ble g

roup

s

% o

f com

plic

ated

del

iver

ies

Stun

ting r

ate a

mon

g ch

ildre

n un

der fi

ve

40%

10%

55.7

% 13

%

Rep

ublic

an H

ealth

In

form

atio

n C

ente

rD

HS,

MIC

S, M

DG

Pr

ogre

ss R

epor

ts an

d ot

her U

N A

naly

tical

M

ater

ials

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

oH, K

yrgy

z Cou

ntry

Mul

tisec

-to

ral C

oord

inat

ion

Com

mitt

ee (C

MC

C),

Man

dato

ry H

ealth

Insu

ranc

e Fun

d un

der

the G

over

nmen

t of t

he K

R:

Adhe

renc

e to s

tand

ards

set f

or se

rvice

s/gen

der r

espon

sive p

lann

ing a

nd bu

dgeti

ng;

prog

ram

me a

nd po

licy p

lann

ing,

deve

lopm

ent,

coor

dina

tion

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring,

socia

l ser

vices

to su

ppor

t refu

gees,

asylu

m se

eker

s, re

turn

ees a

nd st

atele

ss pe

rsons

; adv

ocac

y, co

ordi

natio

n, su

rvey

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d mon

itorin

g, pr

ovid

e str

ong o

n-go

ing o

versi

ght a

nd gu

idan

ce in

a co

urse

of th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of GF

gr

ants.

Don

or co

mm

unity

: Co

ordi

natio

n of

techn

ical a

nd fin

ancia

l reso

urces

thro

ugh

exist

ing d

onor

coor

dina

tion

mech

anism

s.

IO/N

GO

s/A

cade

mic

Insti

tutio

ns/A

ssoc

iatio

ns, i

nclu

ding

Help

Age

Inte

rnat

iona

l, Sa

ve th

e Chi

ldre

n U

K, D

RC, A

CT

ED, M

ercy

Cor

ps, C

risis

Cen

ter S

ezim

, Pub

lic

Foun

datio

n C

ount

erpa

rt-S

herik

tesh

, Cen

ter f

or In

tern

atio

nal P

rote

ctio

n, R

efug

ee

Wom

en C

ente

r Dus

ti:

Infor

mat

ion ca

mpa

igns t

o ens

ure a

ware

ness

of vu

lnera

ble g

roup

s abo

ut th

e exi

sting

ser

vices

and s

ocia

l pro

tectio

n m

echan

isms;

mob

ilizin

g com

mun

ities,

awar

eness

raisi

ng

of th

e pop

ulat

ion on

thre

ats a

nd pr

even

tion

of H

IV/T

B/ST

I; he

lp to

stre

ngth

en-

ing s

ervi

ces de

liver

y to t

he h

igh ri

sk gr

oups

of po

pula

tion,

socia

l dia

logue

, sup

port

to

prog

ram

me p

lann

ing,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d mon

itorin

g, ca

pacit

y bui

ldin

g, pr

ovisi

on

of ba

sic/es

sentia

l ser

vices

to an

d enh

ancin

g edu

catio

n op

portu

nitie

s of r

efuge

es, as

ylum

see

kers,

retu

rnee

s and

stat

eless

perso

ns; d

ata c

ollect

ion, s

tudi

es, cu

rricu

lum

deve

lop-

men

t and

trai

ning

;

Priv

ate s

ecto

r: Im

plem

enta

tion,

mon

itorin

g and

feed

back

.

Com

mun

ities

: Par

ticip

ation

and i

mpl

emen

tatio

n.

UN

DP:

US$

34,

100,

000

UN

FPA

:

U

S$ 3

,800

,000

UN

HC

R:

US$

3,9

00,0

00

UN

ICEF

:

U

S$ 2

1,00

0,00

0

UN

ESC

O:

US$

500

,000

ILO

:

US$

20,

000

UN

AID

S:

U

S$ 2

50,0

00

WFP

*:

U

S $8

,000

,000

WH

O:

US$

100

,000

UN

V**

: U

S$ 1

3,20

0

UN

Wom

en:

U

S$ 2

00,0

00

UN

DA

F R

esul

ts an

d R

esou

rces

Fra

mew

ork

2012

-201

6:SO

CIA

L IN

CLU

SIO

N A

ND

EQ

UIT

Y

20

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

Kyr

gyzs

tan’s

rank

ing i

n in

tern

atio

nal a

sses

smen

t on

lear

ning

achi

evem

ent

(PIS

A)

Seco

ndar

y sch

ool c

ompl

e-tio

n ra

te

Incr

ease

in ra

nkin

g 93

%

Last

pla

ce in

ra

nkin

g (67

th)

78%

PISA

, nat

iona

l MLA

st

udie

s Sc

hool

dro

p-ou

t st

udy;

MIC

S

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Edu

catio

n an

d Sc

i-en

ce, K

yrgy

z Aca

dem

y of E

duca

tion,

Min

istry

of E

mer

genc

y Situ

atio

n:

Educ

ation

stra

tegy a

nd co

ncep

t de

velop

men

t, im

plem

enta

tion,

prog

ram

me p

lan-

ning

, adv

ocac

y, an

d coo

rdin

ation

; sur

vey

mon

itorin

g and

eval

uatio

n; re

visio

n of

curr

iculu

m, t

each

ing/

learn

ing p

roces

ses, e

duca

tion

man

agem

ent,

finan

cing;

capa

city

deve

lopm

ent,

awar

eness

raisi

ng, p

rovi

sion

of di

rect

servi

ces to

child

ren;

Parli

amen

t Edu

catio

n C

omm

ittee

: Par

liam

ent h

earin

g and

advo

cacy

.

Kyr

gyz A

cade

my o

f Edu

catio

n: C

urric

ulum

deve

lopm

ent,

in-se

rvice

and p

re-se

rvice

sta

ndar

ds de

velop

men

t.

IO/N

GO

s/A

cade

mic

insti

tutio

ns/A

ssoc

iatio

ns T

each

ers’

trad

e uni

ons,

loca

l aut

hori-

ties,

NG

Os:

Dat

a coll

ection

, stu

dies,

supp

ort t

o pla

nnin

g, im

plem

enta

tion

and m

onito

ring,

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t; su

ppor

t in

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d mon

itorin

g of d

irect

servi

ces to

ch

ildre

n.

Priv

ate s

ecto

r: Im

plem

enta

tion,

men

torin

g and

mon

itorin

g.

% o

f elig

ible

fam

ilies

with

ch

ildre

n be

nefit

ing f

rom

po

vert

y tar

gete

d ca

sh

tran

sfers

% o

f inc

reas

e of t

arge

ted

HH

s with

bor

derli

ne an

d ad

equa

te F

ood

Con

sum

p-tio

n Sc

ore

80%

of e

xtre

me p

oor

hous

ehol

ds b

enefi

t fro

m

pove

rty t

arge

ted

cash

tr

ansfe

r

55%

of t

he m

ost v

ulne

r-ab

le h

ouse

hold

s im

prov

e th

eir f

ood

cons

umpt

ion

(upg

rade

from

poo

r to

bord

erlin

e or a

ccep

t-ab

le fo

od co

nsum

ptio

n pa

tter

n).

60%

of

extr

eme p

oor

hous

ehol

ds

don’

t ben

efit

from

pov

erty

ta

rget

ed ca

sh

tran

sfer

40%

of t

he

assis

ted

hous

e-ho

lds u

pgra

ded

from

poo

r to

bord

erlin

e or

acce

ptab

le fo

od

cons

umpt

ion

patt

ern.

.

Kyr

gyzs

tan

Inte

grat

ed

Hou

seho

ld S

urve

y (K

IHS)

, soc

ial p

rote

c-tio

n ad

min

istra

tive

reco

rds

WFP

/Gov

ernm

ent

food

secu

rity m

onito

r-in

g sys

tem

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Soc

ial

Prot

ectio

n of

Pop

ulat

ion,

Sta

te A

genc

y of L

ocal

Sel

f- G

over

nanc

e, M

oE an

d Lo

cal G

over

nmen

t au

thor

ities

: D

evelo

pmen

t, im

plem

enta

tion

and m

onito

ring o

f poli

cy an

d stra

tegy o

n soc

ial p

rotec

-tio

n/ch

ild pr

otect

ion sy

stem

refor

m, d

ata c

ollect

ion an

d ana

lysis,

deve

lopm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n of

legisl

ation

, stre

ngth

enin

g chi

ld pr

otect

ion an

d soc

ial p

rotec

tion

system

, tech

nica

l assi

stanc

e to t

he lo

cal s

ubdi

visio

ns; r

eferra

l, pla

nnin

g.

Parli

amen

t: Ad

voca

cy an

d ext

erna

l mon

itorin

g.

Com

mun

ities

: Ide

ntifi

catio

n, re

ferra

l, par

ticip

ation

and i

mpl

emen

tatio

n.

Don

ors:

Supp

ort t

o poli

cy di

alog

ue, c

apac

ity de

velop

men

t, im

plem

enta

tion

supp

ort,

resea

rch, m

onito

ring a

nd ev

alua

tion.

Min

istry

of

Soci

al P

rote

ctio

n of

Pop

ulat

ion,

NG

Os,

loca

l Gov

ernm

ent a

utho

ritie

s.

21

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

% o

f mos

t-at-r

isk p

opul

a-tio

ns (M

AR

PS) w

ho

rece

ived

an H

IV te

st in

the

last

12

mon

ths a

nd w

ho

know

thei

r res

ults

80%

52%

UN

GA

SS d

ata,

AID

S C

ente

r, Su

rvey

sC

ount

ry M

ultis

ecto

ral C

oord

inat

ion

Com

mitt

ee (C

MC

C) f

or im

plem

enta

tion

of

GFA

TM

gra

nts;

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

Parli

amen

t, D

P, C

omm

uni-

ties,

espe

cial

ly M

oE, M

oH an

d N

atio

nal A

IDS

Cen

tre:

O

versi

ght o

f gra

nts i

mpl

emen

tatio

n, go

vern

ance,

mon

itorin

g and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the p

rogr

amm

es; so

cial d

ialog

ue, le

gisla

tion,

polic

y dev

elopm

ent a

nd pl

anni

ng,

data

colle

ction

, ins

titut

ional

set-u

p and

syste

ms d

evelo

pmen

t, ad

voca

cy, c

oord

inat

ion,

com

mun

icatio

n, (c

ompli

ance)

mon

itorin

g and

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t; de

velop

men

t of

prog

ram

mes,

resou

rce m

ater

ials

and d

elive

ry of

prev

entiv

e edu

catio

n tra

inin

gs;

Reg

iona

l HIV

and

heal

th in

stitu

tions

, NG

Os:

Pl

anni

ng, i

mpl

emen

tatio

n an

d coo

rdin

ation

, adv

ocac

y mon

itorin

g.

IOs a

nd d

onor

s, es

peci

ally

, WB,

GFA

TM

, USA

ID, K

FW, M

SF:

Supp

ort t

o poli

cy di

alog

ue, c

apac

ity de

velop

men

t, im

plem

enta

tion

supp

ort,

resea

rch,

mon

itorin

g and

eval

uatio

n.

MA

RPs

net

wor

ks an

d as

soci

atio

ns:

Parti

cipat

ion an

d im

plem

enta

tion.

Med

ia: A

ware

ness

raisi

ng an

d adv

ocac

y.

Aca

dem

ia: T

each

ing a

nd pr

omot

ing H

IV/T

B/ST

I.

% o

f esti

mat

ed H

IV-

posit

ive i

ncid

ent T

B ca

ses

that

rece

ived

trea

tmen

t for

T

B an

d H

IV

80%

52%

UN

GA

SS d

ata,

data

, N

atio

nal A

IDS

Cen

ter

and

Nat

iona

l Phy

siol-

ogy C

entr

e, Su

rvey

s

Cou

ntry

Mul

tisec

tora

l Coo

rdin

atio

n C

omm

ittee

(Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent

Age

ncie

s inc

ludi

ng P

arlia

men

t, D

P, C

omm

uniti

es),

Min

istry

of H

ealth

, Nat

iona

l Ph

ysio

logy

Cen

tre,

Nat

iona

l AID

S C

entr

e:

Supp

ort p

roces

ses, s

ocia

l dia

logue

, leg

islat

ion, p

olicy

dev

elopm

ent a

nd pl

anni

ng, d

ata

colle

ction

, ins

titut

ional

set-u

p and

syste

ms d

evelo

pmen

t, ad

voca

cy, c

oord

inat

ion, c

om-

mun

icatio

n, (c

ompli

ance)

mon

itorin

g and

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t.

IOs a

nd d

onor

s, es

peci

ally,

WB,

GFA

TM

, USA

ID, K

FW, M

SF, I

CRC

: Su

ppor

t to p

olicy

dial

ogue

, cap

acity

deve

lopm

ent,

impl

emen

tatio

n su

ppor

t, re

search

, m

onito

ring a

nd ev

alua

tion.

Reg

iona

l HIV

, TB

and

heal

th in

stitu

tions

: Pla

nnin

g, co

ordi

natio

n, im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itorin

g.

Com

mun

ities

: Par

ticip

ation

and i

mpl

emen

tatio

n.

Med

ia: A

ware

ness

raisi

ng an

d adv

ocac

y.

Aca

dem

ia: E

duca

tion

on H

IV/T

B iss

ues

22

% o

f GBV

surv

ivor

s who

re

ceiv

ed re

leva

nt p

acka

ge

of se

rvic

es o

ut o

f all

GBV

su

rviv

ors a

pplie

d fo

r as-

sista

nce

40%

0%St

ate a

genc

ies a

nd

rele

vant

serv

ice

prov

ider

s mon

itorin

g sy

stem

s, in

depe

nden

t su

rvey

s and

Nat

iona

l St

atist

ical

Com

mitt

ee

surv

eys

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly, M

oI, C

ourt

Sys

tem

, MoH

, M

inist

ry o

f So

cial

Pro

tect

ion

of P

opul

atio

n:

Adhe

renc

e to s

tand

ards

set f

or se

rvice

s/gen

der r

espon

sive p

lann

ing a

nd bu

dgeti

ng.

IOs/

NG

Os:

Infor

mat

ion ca

mpa

igns t

o ens

ure a

ware

ness

of vu

lnera

ble g

roup

s abo

ut th

e exi

sting

ser

vices

and s

ocia

l pro

tectio

n m

echan

isms;

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d coo

rdin

ation

, ad

voca

cy; m

onito

ring a

nd ev

alua

tion.

Med

ia:

Awar

eness

raisi

ng an

d adv

ocac

y aim

ed at

beha

vior

chan

ge.

UN

DA

F PI

LLA

R B

TO

TAL

US$

71,

883,

200

23

Mid

-Ter

m N

atio

nal P

rior

ities

(201

1-20

12):

Eco

nom

ic d

evel

opm

ent,

redu

ctio

n of

une

mpl

oym

ent a

nd en

hanc

ing

inte

rnat

iona

l eco

nom

ic co

oper

atio

n

S

ocia

l dev

elop

men

t and

envi

ronm

ent p

rote

ctio

nU

ND

AF

Pilla

r C:

I

nclu

sive a

nd S

usta

inab

le Jo

b-R

ich

Gro

wth

for P

over

ty R

educ

tion

Rel

evan

t MD

Gs:

M

DG

1: E

radi

cate

extr

eme p

over

ty an

d hu

nger

MD

G 5

: Im

prov

e mat

erna

l hea

lthM

DG

2: A

chie

ve u

nive

rsal

prim

ary e

duca

tion

MD

G 6

: Com

bat H

IV/A

IDS,

mal

aria

and

othe

r dise

ases

MD

G 3

: Pro

mot

e gen

der e

qual

ity an

d em

pow

er w

omen

MD

G 7

: Ens

ure e

nviro

nmen

tal s

usta

inab

ility

MD

G 4

: Red

uce c

hild

mor

talit

y

MD

G 8

: Dev

elop

a gl

obal

par

tner

ship

for d

evel

opm

ent

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

(per

Out

com

e)

Out

com

e 1:

By th

e end

of

2016

, pop

ulat

ion,

es

peci

ally

vu

lner

able

gro

ups,

bene

fit fr

om

incl

usiv

e gro

wth

le

adin

g to

dec

ent

and

prod

uctiv

e em

ploy

men

t and

im

prov

ed ac

cess

to

prod

uctiv

e nat

ural

re

sour

ces,

mar

kets

, se

rvic

es a

nd fo

od

secu

rity

% o

f em

ploy

ed p

erso

ns in

to

tal e

cono

mic

ally

activ

e po

pula

tion

Incr

ease

of t

he sh

are o

f em

ploy

men

t in

tota

l eco

-no

mic

ally

activ

e pop

ula-

tion

by1.

0-2.

0 pe

rcen

tage

po

ints

annu

ally

Econ

omic

ally

ac

tive p

opul

a-tio

n: 2

351

316

(C

ensu

s 200

9);

empl

oyed

: 2

111

160

(Cen

-su

s 200

9)

Nat

iona

l Sta

tisti-

cal C

omm

ittee

dat

a an

d re

port

s, M

DG

Pr

ogre

ss R

epor

ts a

nd

othe

r UN

Ana

lytic

al

Mat

eria

ls

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Eco

nom

ic R

egul

atio

n an

d D

evel

opm

ent,

Min

istry

of L

abou

r, Em

ploy

men

t and

Mig

ratio

n, M

oF, N

ALS

G,

MoA

, SR

S, M

oJ in

clud

ing P

resid

ent’s

Offi

ce, P

arlia

men

t and

its C

omm

ittee

s and

Com

-m

issio

ns, F

ruit

Proc

essin

g Ent

erpr

ises:

Ensu

ring s

uppo

rt for

equa

l righ

ts of

wom

en an

d vul

nera

ble g

roup

s to b

enefi

t from

ex

istin

g eco

nom

ic op

portu

nitie

s, leg

islat

ion an

d poli

cy de

velop

men

t, pl

anni

ng an

d im

plem

enta

tion,

advo

cacy

, coo

rdin

ation

and m

onito

ring,

voca

tiona

l edu

catio

n sys

tem de

velop

men

t, ca

pacit

y dev

elopm

ent;

cont

ribut

e to

incre

ase

shar

e of a

gricu

lture

pr

oduc

tion

bein

g pro

cessed

and m

arke

ted, s

tabi

lize i

ncom

e; ac

cess t

o em

ploy

men

t to

refu

gees,

asylu

m se

eker

s, re

turn

ees a

nd st

atele

ss pe

rsons

.

IO/N

GO

s/ac

adem

ic in

stitu

tions

incl

udin

g Leg

al C

linic

Adi

let,

Cen

ter f

or In

tern

a-tio

nal P

rote

ctio

n, C

risis

Cen

ter S

ezim

: Su

ppor

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

wom

en’s e

cono

mic

right

s ini

tiativ

es at

loca

l and

co

mm

unity

leve

ls; d

ata c

ollect

ion, s

tudi

es, su

ppor

t to p

lann

ing,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring,

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t, cu

rricu

lum

deve

lopm

ent a

nd tr

aini

ng; l

egal

/socia

l as

sista

nce,

food a

id, v

ocat

ional

trai

ning

and i

ncom

e gen

eratio

n ac

tiviti

es for

refu

gees,

as

ylum

seek

ers,

retu

rnee

s and

stat

eless

perso

ns.

Priv

ate s

ecto

r: Su

ppor

t inc

ome g

enera

tion

activ

ities

of th

e tar

get c

omm

uniti

es.

Nat

iona

l Sta

tistic

s Com

mitt

ee:

Anal

ysis o

f pov

erty

inclu

ding

child

pove

rty.

CA

CSA

RC (C

entr

al A

sian

Cra

fts S

uppo

rt A

ssoc

iatio

n R

ecou

rse C

ente

r):

Dev

elopm

ent o

f cra

fts in

dustr

y

UN

DP:

US$

15,

300,

000

UN

ICEF

:

U

S$ 1

50,0

00

UN

ESC

O:

US$

100

,000

UN

OD

C:

US$

250

,000

UN

HC

R:

U

S$ 3

,510

,000

UN

IDO

: U

S$ 2

,124

,400

WFP

*:

U

S$ 5

,000

,000

UN

ECE:

US$

100

,000

ILO

:

US

$900

,000

UN

V**

: U

S$ 6

61,2

59

UN

Wom

en:

U

S$ 2

,500

,000

UN

DA

F R

esul

ts an

d R

esou

rces

Fra

mew

ork

2012

-201

6:IN

CLU

SIV

E A

ND

SU

STA

INA

BLE

JOB

-RIC

H G

RO

WT

H F

OR

PO

VER

TY

RED

UC

TIO

N

24

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

(per

Out

com

e)

% o

f peo

ple l

ivin

g bel

ow

the o

ffici

al p

over

ty li

ne%

dec

reas

e of p

eopl

e liv

ing i

n po

vert

y by 2

.5-

3.0%

annu

ally

55%

of t

he m

ost v

ulne

r-ab

le h

ouse

hold

s im

prov

e th

eir f

ood

cons

umpt

ion

(upg

rade

from

poo

r to

bord

erlin

e or a

ccep

t-ab

le fo

od co

nsum

ptio

n pa

tter

n)

Pove

rty r

atio

co

nstit

uted

31

,7%

in

ac-

cord

ance

with

m

etho

dol-

ogy o

f Nat

iona

l St

atist

ical

Com

-m

ittee

. Cur

-re

ntly

Nat

iona

l St

atist

ical

Com

-m

ittee

doe

s not

pr

ovid

e dat

a lo

wer

than

leve

l of

pro

vinc

es.

40%

of t

he

assis

ted

hous

e-ho

lds u

pgra

ded

from

poo

r to

bord

erlin

e or

acce

ptab

le fo

od

cons

umpt

ion

patt

ern

Nat

iona

l Sta

tistic

al

Com

mitt

ee d

ata a

nd

repo

rts,

MD

G P

rog-

ress

Rep

orts

Emer

genc

y Foo

d Se

curit

y Ass

essm

ents

(E

FSA

), K

yrgy

zsta

n In

tegr

ated

Hou

seho

ld

Surv

eys (

KIH

S)

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Soc

ial P

rote

ctio

n of

Po

pula

tion,

loca

l gov

ernm

ent a

utho

ritie

s and

NG

Os.

Rat

io o

f GD

P to

num

ber

of w

orke

rsIn

crea

se in

GD

P pe

r w

orke

r Ba

selin

e to

be

carr

ied

out i

n 20

11

Dat

a of N

atio

nal

Stat

istic

al C

omm

ittee

da

ta an

d re

port

s

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

OLE

M, N

SC, l

ocal

auth

oriti

es:

Dat

a coll

ection

and a

nalys

is, le

gisla

tion,

capa

city a

nd in

stitu

tion

build

ing,

polic

y de

velop

men

t, im

plem

enta

tion,

mon

itorin

g and

eval

uatio

n.

Trad

e Uni

ons a

nd E

mpl

oyer

s org

aniz

atio

ns, l

ocal

auth

oriti

es:

Supp

ort t

o poli

cy de

velop

men

t, im

plem

enta

tion,

mon

itorin

g and

eval

uatio

n

Nat

iona

l Sta

tistic

s Com

mitt

ee:

Prod

ucin

g reli

able

shor

t-ter

m ec

onom

ic sta

tistic

s and

dat

a for

mon

itorin

g pro

gress

to

ward

s the

achi

evem

ent o

f the

MD

Gs,

with

a sp

ecial

focu

s on

pove

rty an

d vul

nera

ble

grou

ps.

% o

f wor

kers

with

earn

ings

at

or b

elow

the n

atio

nal

pove

rty l

ine (

the s

o ca

lled

wor

king

poo

r)

Dec

reas

ing %

of w

orke

rs

with

earn

ings

at o

r bel

ow

the n

atio

nal p

over

ty li

ne

Base

line t

o be

carr

ied

out

2011

Nat

iona

l Sta

tistic

al

Com

mitt

ee d

ata a

nd

repo

rts;

othe

r rel

evan

t re

port

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Soc

ial P

rote

ctio

n of

Po

pula

tion,

loca

l gov

ernm

ent a

utho

ritie

s and

NG

Os

OU

TC

OM

E 1

TO

TAL

US$

30,

595,

659

25

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

(per

Out

com

e)

Out

com

e 2:

By en

d of

201

6 su

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t of

ener

gy, e

nviro

n-m

ent a

nd n

atur

al

reso

urce

s pra

ctic

es

oper

atio

naliz

ed

% o

f peo

ple l

ivin

g in

eco

syst

ems r

esili

ent t

o cl

imat

e ch

ange

Ecos

yste

m ap

proa

ch is

in

tegr

ated

into

nat

iona

l an

d lo

cal d

evel

opm

ent

strat

egie

s.

Abs

ence

of

eco

syst

em

appr

oach

in

stra

tegi

c pl

anni

ng at

the

natio

nal a

nd

loca

l lev

els

Offi

cial

dat

a and

re

port

s of

min

istrie

s, ag

enci

es an

d lo

cal a

u-th

oriti

es; U

N re

port

s

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly S

tate

Age

ncy o

n En

viro

nmen

t Pr

otec

tion

and

Fore

stry (

SAEP

F), M

oE, R

enew

able

Ene

rgy S

ourc

es (R

ES) D

irect

or-

ate,

Nat

iona

l Com

mitt

ee o

n C

limat

e Cha

nge i

nclu

ding

Sta

te A

genc

y for

Pro

tect

ion

of

Envi

ronm

ent a

nd F

ores

try,

Min

istry

of C

ultu

re an

d In

form

atio

n, A

cade

my o

f Sci

ence

s: Fa

cilita

tion

and c

oord

inat

ion of

plan

ning

and i

mpl

emen

tatio

n; pr

epar

ation

of

nom

inat

ion fil

es an

d man

agem

ent p

lans

, doc

umen

tatio

n, co

nser

vatio

n, sa

fegua

rdin

g, m

anag

emen

t, m

aint

enan

ce, m

onito

ring,

educ

ation

, inf

orm

ation

and t

ouris

m.

Reg

iona

l and

loca

l aut

horit

ies:

Iden

tifyin

g need

s and

com

mun

ity ba

sed pr

ojects

e.g.

in w

ater

man

agem

ent,

ener

gy

efficie

ncy,

uran

ium

taili

ngs.

IOs a

nd N

GO

s: Ca

pacit

y dev

elopm

ent a

nd su

ppor

t to i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

activ

ities,

deve

lopm

ent o

f ac

tion

plan

s and

impl

emen

tatio

n.

Com

mun

ities

: Com

mun

ity m

obili

zatio

n an

d par

ticip

ation

, im

plem

enta

tion.

UN

DP:

US$

13,7

00,0

00

UN

ESC

O:

US$

550,

000

UN

ECE:

U

S$55

0,00

0 U

NEP

:

US$

200,

000

WFP

*:

U

S$3,

000,

000

UN

V**

: U

S$ 7

,500

FAO

US$

6,00

0,00

0

% o

f wat

er u

se effi

cien

cy

for a

gric

ultu

ral p

rodu

ctio

n Eff

ectiv

enes

s of i

rrig

atio

n w

ater

use

by r

ural

pop

ula-

tion

is im

prov

ed

Wat

er lo

sses

in

the i

rrig

atio

n sy

stem

fro

m

the w

ater

sour

ce

to d

estin

atio

n ra

nge f

rom

20-

40%

on

aver

age

Ann

ual r

epor

ts o

f the

re

-esta

blish

ed S

tate

C

omm

ittee

on

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent a

nd

Rec

lam

atio

n

Uni

vers

ities

in co

oper

atio

n w

ith M

inist

ry o

f Edu

catio

n an

d Sc

ienc

es a

nd n

atio

nal

wat

er au

thor

ities

: In

trodu

ction

and d

elive

ring n

ew IW

RM cu

rricu

la.

Stat

e Com

mitt

ee o

n W

ater

Man

agem

ent a

nd R

ecla

mat

ion

Wat

er U

sers

Ass

ocia

tions

and

NG

Os,

agric

ultu

re b

usin

ess a

ssoc

iatio

ns

% in

crea

se o

f agr

icul

tura

l pr

oduc

tion

for m

arke

ts

and

hous

ehol

ds (H

H)

Incr

ease

in vo

lum

e of

agric

ultu

re p

rodu

ctio

nA

gric

ultu

re,

hunt

ing a

nd

fore

stry g

ross

pr

oduc

tion

- 30

65 m

illio

n U

SD in

200

8 (N

atio

nal S

tatis

-tic

Com

mitt

ee,

2010

)

107.

4% g

row

th

in vo

lum

e of

agric

ultu

re p

ro-

duct

ion,

fore

stry

and

hunt

ing i

n co

mpa

rison

to

2008

(Nat

iona

l St

atist

ic C

om-

mitt

ee, 2

010)

Offi

cial

dat

a and

re-

port

s of t

he N

atio

nal

Stat

istic

al C

omm

ittee

, U

N R

epor

ts (i

nclu

d-in

g Cro

p an

d Fo

od

Secu

rity A

sses

smen

t M

onito

ring (

CFS

AM

, EF

SA)

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Soc

ial P

rote

ctio

n of

Po

pula

tion,

Min

istry

of A

gric

ultu

re , l

ocal

gov

ernm

ent a

utho

ritie

s and

NG

Os.

26

% re

duct

ion

in co

nsum

p-tio

n of

HC

FCs-

Hyd

ro-

chlo

roflu

oroc

arbo

ns

10%

redu

ctio

n by

201

5C

urre

nt

cons

umpt

ion

is 4

OD

S to

ns

per y

ear

Ozo

ne A

ctio

n Se

cre-

taria

t, U

NEP

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f Em

erge

ncy S

ituat

ions

, M

inist

ry o

f Ene

rgy,

Stat

e Age

ncy o

n En

viro

nmen

t Pro

tect

ion

and

Fore

stry,

Ozo

ne

Cen

tre,

NO

U:

Man

agin

g and

mon

itorin

g the

nat

ional

stra

tegy f

or ph

asin

g out

ozon

e-dep

letin

g su

bsta

nces;

repo

rting

dat

a and

und

erta

king

awar

eness

raisi

ng ac

tiviti

es.

% o

f pop

ulat

ion

bene

fitin

g fro

m n

on ca

rbon

ener

gy

sour

ces

Incr

ease

of n

on ca

rbon

en

ergy

sour

ces t

o 1%

of

tota

l ene

rgy p

rodu

ctio

n

non

carb

on

sour

ces o

f en-

ergy

repr

esen

t 0.

7 %

of t

otal

en

ergy

pro

duc-

tion

Offi

cial

dat

a and

re

port

s of t

he M

inist

ry

of E

nerg

y, R

ES D

irec-

tora

te as

wel

l as r

epor

ts

of S

HP/

RES

pro

ject

s

Key

Min

istrie

s, es

peci

ally

Min

istry

of E

nerg

y, G

over

nmen

t Age

ncie

s and

Aca

dem

ia:

Dev

elopi

ng R

ES cu

rricu

la, t

rain

ing f

or lo

cal p

opul

ation

.

OU

TC

OM

E 2

TO

TAL

US$

24,

007,

500

27

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

(per

Out

com

e)

Out

com

e 3:

By 2

016,

Disa

ster

R

isk M

anag

emen

t (D

RM

) fra

mew

ork

in co

mpl

ianc

e with

in

tern

atio

nal s

tan-

dard

s. es

peci

ally

th

e Hyo

go F

ram

e-w

ork

of A

ctio

n

Nat

iona

l ins

titut

iona

l, le

gal a

nd p

olic

y fra

mew

ork

for d

isast

er ri

sk re

duct

ion

(DR

R) w

ith d

ecen

tral

ized

re

spon

sibili

ties,

reso

urce

s an

d ca

paci

ties a

t all

leve

ls

Disa

ster

risk

redu

ctio

n (D

RR

) leg

al, i

nstit

utio

nal

and

polic

y fra

mew

orks

th

at fe

atur

e coh

eren

ce

and

mec

hani

sms o

f co

ordi

natio

n ad

opte

d an

d fu

nctio

nal

Nat

iona

l in

stitu

tiona

l, le

gal a

nd p

olic

y fr

amew

ork

for

disa

ster

risk

re-

duct

ion

(DR

R)

at n

asce

nt

stage

s

Dat

a and

repo

rts o

f M

inist

ry o

f Em

erge

ncy

Situ

atio

n, L

ocal

Sel

f-G

over

nmen

ts, U

N

(incl

. Disa

ster

Risk

R

educ

tion

Uni

t -

DRC

U) a

nd p

artn

ers’

repo

rts

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry fo

r Em

erge

ncy S

itua-

tions

(MES

), N

atio

nal A

genc

y on

Loca

l Sel

f-Gov

erna

nce (

NA

LSG

) and

Par

liam

ent:

Polic

y dev

elopm

ent a

nd pl

anni

ng, i

nstit

ution

al se

t-up,

legisl

ation

deve

lopm

ent,

resp

onse

coor

dina

tion

and c

omm

unica

tion;

cont

inge

ncy p

lann

ing;

emer

genc

y pre

-pa

redn

ess.

Reg

iona

l and

loca

l aut

horit

ies:

Coor

dina

te an

d fac

ilita

te pr

ocess

es an

d stru

cture

s at t

he re

giona

l and

loca

l lev

els.

IO/N

GO

s/ac

adem

ic in

stitu

tions

:Pr

omot

e DRR

, pro

vide

supp

ort t

o pro

cesses

and s

tructu

res,

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t; em

erge

ncy p

repa

redn

ess,

UN

DP:

US$

2,2

00,0

00

UN

ESC

O:

US$

100

,000

UN

ICEF

:

US$

1,0

00,0

00

UN

HC

R:

U

S$ 2

,340

,000

WFP

*:

U

S$3,

000,

000

UN

V**

: U

S$ 1

7,96

6

% o

f Loc

al S

elf G

over

n-m

ents’

(LSG

s) lo

cal

deve

lopm

ent p

lans

with

in

tegr

ated

disa

ster

risk

re-

duct

ion

(DR

R) s

trat

egie

s

Disa

ster

risk

redu

ctio

n (D

RR

) str

ateg

ies i

nteg

rat-

ed in

lea

st 1

0% L

ocal

Sel

f G

over

nmen

ts’ (L

SGs)

lo

cal d

evel

opm

ent p

lans

Disa

ster

risk

redu

ctio

n (D

RR

) mon

itorin

g sy

stem

esta

blish

ed an

d fu

nctio

nal (

info

rmin

g lo

cal s

ocio

-eco

nom

ic

plan

ning

) in

at le

ast 1

0%

of L

SGs

Abs

ence

of

disa

ster

risk

re

duct

ion

(DR

R) s

trat

e-gi

es in

tegr

ated

in

Loc

al S

elf

Gov

ernm

ents’

(L

SGs)

loca

l de

velo

pmen

t pl

ans

Abs

ence

of

disa

ster

risk

re-

duct

ion

(DR

R)

mon

itorin

g sys

-te

m th

at w

ould

in

form

loca

l le

vel p

lann

ing

Offi

cial

dat

a and

re

port

s by L

ocal

Se

lf-G

over

nmen

ts,

Min

istry

of E

mer

genc

y Si

tuat

ion,

Nat

iona

l A

genc

y for

Loc

al

Self-

Gov

erna

nce,

Stat

e A

genc

y on

Envi

ron-

men

tal P

rote

ctio

n

Com

mun

ities

, esp

ecia

lly th

ose a

t risk

or a

ffect

ed:

Repr

esent

ation

and p

artic

ipat

ion, e

nsur

e inc

lusio

n of

view

s of c

omm

uniti

es an

d most

vu

lnera

ble.

IO/N

GO

s: Re

spon

se co

ordi

natio

n, co

ntin

genc

y pla

nnin

g, ca

pacit

y dev

elopm

ent a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n.

28

Out

com

esIn

dica

tors

Targ

ets

Base

lines

Mea

ns o

f Ver

ifica

tion

Rol

e of P

artn

ers

Indi

cativ

e Res

ourc

es

(per

Out

com

e)

% o

f disa

ster

pro

ne co

m-

mun

ities

and

inst

itutio

ns

with

redu

ced

vuln

er-

abili

ties

Vuln

erab

ilitie

s red

uced

in

10%

of c

omm

uniti

es

pron

e to

natu

ral d

isast

ers

Res

ilien

ce o

f vul

ner-

able

gro

ups t

o sh

ocks

is

stren

gthe

ned

Cap

aciti

es to

addr

ess

disa

ster

risk

redu

ctio

n (D

RR

) of s

take

hold

ers i

n ed

ucat

ion

stren

gthe

ned

and

educ

atio

n cu

rric

ula

mai

nstr

eam

s disa

ster

risk

re

duct

ion

(DR

R)

70%

of c

om-

mun

ities

in

Kyr

gyzs

tan

are

vuln

erab

le to

na

tura

l disa

ster

s

Inad

equa

te

know

ledg

e and

ca

paci

ties o

f sta

keho

lder

s in

educ

atio

n to

ad

dres

s disa

ster

ris

k re

duct

ion

(DR

R) a

nd

appl

y rel

ated

ex

istin

g pol

i-ci

es; a

bsen

ce o

f di

sast

er ri

sk re

-du

ctio

n (D

RR

) in

educ

atio

n cu

rric

ula

Dat

a and

repo

rts o

f M

inist

ry o

f Em

erge

ncy

Situ

atio

n, M

inist

ry

of E

duca

tion

and

Scie

nce,

Min

istry

of

Soci

al P

rote

ctio

n of

Po

pula

tion,

Loc

al

Self-

Gov

ernm

ents

, Na-

tiona

l Age

ncy f

or L

o-ca

l Sel

f-Gov

erna

nce,

Nat

iona

l Sta

tistic

al

Com

mitt

ee,

UN

(inc

l. Em

erge

ncy

Food

Sec

urity

Ass

ess-

men

t, C

rop

and

Food

Se

curit

y Ass

essm

ent)

an

d pa

rtne

rs’ r

epor

ts

Key

Min

istrie

s and

Gov

ernm

ent A

genc

ies,

espe

cial

ly M

inist

ry o

f So

cial

Pro

tect

ion

of

Popu

latio

n, M

inist

ry o

f Em

erge

ncy S

ituat

ions

, Min

istry

of E

nerg

y, M

oH, M

inist

ry

of E

duca

tion,

KA

E, S

tate

Age

ncy f

or Q

uake

Pro

of C

onstr

uctio

n, lo

cal G

over

nmen

t au

thor

ities

incl

udin

g NG

Os a

nd C

BOs:

Coor

dina

tion,

inno

vatio

n, lo

bbyin

g, aw

aren

ess ra

ising

, poli

cy an

d cur

ricul

um de

-ve

lopm

ent,

revi

sion,

and e

ndor

semen

t; po

licy d

evelo

pmen

t for

plan

ning

educ

ation

in

emer

genc

ies, c

apac

ity bu

ildin

g of e

duca

tion

auth

oriti

es an

d pra

ctitio

ners;

Im

plem

enta

tion

and c

oord

inat

ion, a

dvoc

acy;

Mon

itorin

g and

eval

uatio

n.

Reg

iona

l and

sub-

regi

onal

auth

oriti

es:

Parti

cipat

e in

iden

tifica

tion

of D

RR n

eeds a

nd co

mm

unity

based

DRR

proje

cts.

Aca

dem

ic in

stitu

tions

: Rese

arch

.

IOs/

NG

Os:

Supp

ort t

o inn

ovat

ion an

d dev

elopm

ent,

capa

city d

evelo

pmen

t and

impl

e-m

enta

tion

supp

ort.

Com

mun

ities

: Com

mun

ities,

espe

cially

child

ren

parti

cipat

ion an

d im

plem

enta

tion.

Med

ia: I

nfor

mat

ion an

d awa

rene

ss ra

ising

cam

paign

s, go

vern

men

t pro

gram

mes.

OU

TC

OM

E 3

TO

TAL

US$

8,6

57,9

66

UN

DA

F PI

LLA

R C

TO

TAL

US$

63,

261,

125

UN

DA

F T

OTA

LU

S$ 1

86,0

99,2

62

*WFP

and

OH

CH

R re

sour

ces f

or 2

year

per

iod

only

**U

NV

: “gr

atis”

cont

ribut

ions

of i

ndiv

idua

ls an

d or

gani

zatio

ns

29

UN

DA

F M

&E

Cal

enda

r K

yrgy

z Rep

ublic

20

1220

1320

1420

1520

16

UNCT M&E Activities

Surv

eys/

Stud

ies

KA

P (K

now

ledg

e, A

ttitu

des a

nd P

ract

ices

) ba

selin

e sur

vey o

n pe

rcep

tions

of d

iver

sity

Base

line S

tudy

on

Yout

h En

gage

men

t in

Pea

ce-b

uild

ing –

(UN

ICEF

/UN

DP/

UN

HC

R as

par

t of I

RF

Peac

e-bu

ildin

g pr

opos

al)

Dem

ogra

phic

and

Hea

lth S

urve

y co

nduc

t-ed

(DH

S) (U

SAID

)D

ange

rous

sign

s of p

regn

ancy

surv

ey

(UN

FPA

)3r

d N

atio

nal C

omm

unic

atio

n on

Clim

ate

Cha

nge (

UN

DP)

Surv

ey o

n C

ivil

Soci

ety E

ngag

emen

t in

Polic

y Mak

ing (

UN

DP)

NH

DR

(the

me t

bd)

UN

GA

SS su

rvey

(UN

-A

IDS,

WH

O)

Educ

atio

n Pe

rfor

man

ce

Stud

y (PI

SA)

resu

lts

Dem

ogra

phic

and

Hea

lth

Surv

ey (D

HS)

resu

lts

rele

ased

MIC

S co

nduc

ted

(UN

ICEF

)C

ase s

tudi

es d

ocum

ente

d (a

ll)

Mon

itorin

g Sys

tem

sU

N M

&E

team

to b

e esta

blish

ed

Eval

uatio

nsM

id T

erm

Eva

luat

ion

Rev

iew

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

sYe

s

Planning Reference

UN

DA

F Ev

al. M

ilest

ones

U

ND

AF

Prog

ress

Rep

ort

UN

DA

F Pr

ogre

ss R

epor

tU

ND

AF

Prog

ress

Rep

ort

UN

DA

F Pr

ogre

ss R

epor

t

UN

DA

F Ev

alua

tion

UN

DA

F Pr

ogre

ss R

epor

t

Cap

acity

Dev

elop

men

tSt

atist

ical

Lite

racy

(col

lect

ion,

anal

ysis

and

use o

f dat

a)

Col

lect

ion

of d

ata b

elow

the o

blas

t lev

el to

de

term

ine v

ulne

rabl

e poc

kets

Use

of i

nfo

Stra

tegi

c Ass

essm

ent o

f Unw

ante

d Pr

eg-

nanc

y (U

NFP

A)

Cro

p an

d Fo

od A

sses

smen

t Stu

dy (F

AO

) Em

erge

ncy F

ood

Secu

rity A

sses

smen

t EF

SA (F

AO

/WFP

)

Emer

genc

y Foo

d Se

curit

y A

sses

smen

t EFS

A (F

AO

/W

FP)

Dem

ogra

phic

and

Hea

lth

Surv

ey (D

HS)

Emer

genc

y Foo

d Se

curit

y A

sses

smen

t EFS

A (F

AO

/W

FP)

Dem

ogra

phic

and

Hea

lth

Surv

ey (D

HS)

Emer

genc

y Foo

d Se

curit

y A

sses

smen

t EFS

A (F

AO

/W

FP)

Dem

ogra

phic

and

Hea

lth

Surv

ey (D

HS)

Emer

genc

y Foo

d Se

curit

y A

sses

smen

t EFS

A (F

AO

/W

FP)

Part

ner M

&E

Act

iviti

es

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Ann

ex B

: UN

DA

F M

onito

ring

and

Eval

uatio

n C

alen

dar