UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

16
Unit I: Constitutional Underpinnings of u.s. government Chapter 3: federalism

Transcript of UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Page 1: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Unit I: Constitutional Underpinnings of u.s. government

Chapter 3: federalism

Page 2: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

What is Federalism?

Federalism: When two or more governments exercise power and authority over the same people in the same territory.

Federalism is the relationship and interactions between the federal government and the state governments.

Pursuant to the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article VI), the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the “supreme law of the land.”

Page 3: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Types of governmental powers:Enumerated

Powers (Art. I, §8)Concurrent Powers

(federal and state)

Reserved Powers

(states)Regulating interstate and foreign commerce

Levying taxes Regulating intrastate commerce

Coining and printing money Borrowing money Establishing local governments

Providing army and navy Spending for general welfare Establishing public school systems

Declaring war Chartering banks Administering elections

Establishing federal courts Making and enforcing laws Protecting health and welfare

Conducting Foreign relations Regulating corporations

Necessary and proper laws Establishing and administering licenses

Acquiring territories and admitting states

Establishing state courts

Immigration

Page 4: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Types of governmental powers:Enumerated Powers (federal government):

• Powers specifically assigned to the federal (national) government

Implied Powers (federal government):• Necessary and Proper Clause (Elastic Clause): federal government’s

implied powers (Art. I, §8)• e.g., creation of Bank of the United States in late 18th century

Concurrent Powers (federal and state governments):• Powers shared by or assigned to both the federal and the state

governments

Reserved Powers (10th Amendment) (state governments):• All other powers that are not specifically or impliedly delegated to federal

government and that are not forbidden to the states

Page 5: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Article IV of the constitution:

Full Faith and Credit Clause (Art. IV, Sec. 1):• States must recognize/enforce laws of other states

Privileges and Immunities Clause (Art. IV, Sec. 2):• A state may not discriminate against non-state residents

Page 6: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

National Government’s Guarantees to the States: Article IV of the constitution

Under Article IV, the federal government must guarantee to each state:

• a republican form of government• defense from foreign invasion and domestic violence

• maintenance/safety of borders

Page 7: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

mCculloch v. maryland (1819):

Second Bank of the U.S. (“Bank”) established in 1816

Maryland did not want Bank to operate a branch in Maryland and therefore imposed a tax upon Bank in an attempt to put it out of business.

Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) (Chief Justice John Marshall) holds:

The federal government has implied powers, beyond the enumerated powers, pursuant to the necessary and proper clause of the Constitution (the “Elastic Clause”)

Because the federal government is supreme within its sphere of action (including when exercising its implied powers), the federal government, only, would have authority to tax Bank. Maryland is forbidden from taxing Bank.

Page 8: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Gibbons v. ogden (1824):• Ogden received New York state-issued exclusive license

to operate ferries on Hudson River (monopoly); Gibbons sued on basis that exclusive license interfered with interstate commerce

• SCOTUS (Chief Justice John Marshall) held New York law requiring licensing for out-of-state ferry operators was invalid pursuant to the Supremacy Clause

• Interstate commerce includes navigation on interstate waterways (such as between New York and New Jersey)

• Congress has exclusive jurisdiction over interstate commerce

Page 9: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Federalism: potential benefits and drawbacks

•Best for larger nation?

•Avoids concentration of power?

•Preserves state sovereignty?

•States are training/testing grounds (laboratories of democracy)?

•Government close to the people?

•Too many governments?

•Duplication of powers and functions?

•Conflicts of authority?

Page 10: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Dual Federalism:

• Form of federalism until the New Deal

• National government and state governments retained separate powers and jurisdictions

• “Layer-cake federalism”

• Sovereignty and limits of national government and state governments was expressly upheld

• Sharing of powers was limited

Page 11: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Cooperative Federalism:

• Form of federalism from New Deal through present (with “New Federalism” also popular since 1990s)

• “Marble cake federalism”

• National government and state governments share more powers, cooperate

Page 12: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Dual versus Cooperative federalism:

Page 13: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

“New” Federalism

Devolution: the federal government’s returning power to the state and local governments•1980s-1990s: Fueled by general distrust of the federal government and the desire to reduce the “bloated federal bureaucracy”

•Example: Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (welfare reform): transferred money to states as block grants, with states receiving latitude on how to administer funds but with strings still attached (e.g., head of family must work/perform community service; lifetime cap on benefits; rules for unmarried mothers under age 18; restrictions on immigrants’ eligibility)

Page 14: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

grants and mandates:

• When federal government wants states to implement policies, the federal government can:

• Provide grants to states. States often accept grants, even with “strings attached,” because states desire (“need”) additional funds.

• Issue mandates directed toward states. Mandates require states to satisfy federally-prescribed conditions. Mandates may be fully funded, partially funded, or unfunded.

Page 15: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Fiscal Federalism: grants

Grants-in-Aid: Federal funds provided to states and local governments to be used for specific purposes

• Categorical Grants (“strings attached”):• Federal funds for specific programs and projects

• Example: drinking age must be raised to 21 in all states in order for states to receive highway funds

• Example: State public schools must use internet filtering to keep federal subsidies

• Block Grants:• Awarded for broad, general purposes; allow states

greater discretion in how funds are utilized/spent

Page 16: UNIT I: CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 3: FEDERALISM.

Fiscal Federalism: mandates

Mandate: requirement that a state undertake an activity or provide a service

•By 1992, more than 170 congressional acts contained partially or wholly unfunded mandates

•In 1995, Congress passed the Unfunded Mandates Relief Act to try to address this situation.