Uniform Integrated Protection Ensemble Increment 2 … FoS...Uniform Integrated Protection Ensemble...
Transcript of Uniform Integrated Protection Ensemble Increment 2 … FoS...Uniform Integrated Protection Ensemble...
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
Uniform Integrated ProtectionEnsemble Family of Systems
(UIPE FoS)
LeRoy GareyJoint Project Manager for ProtectionUIPE FoS Product Manager703.617.2382
April 19, 2017
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Industry Day Brief
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Industry Day Agenda
0830 – 0900 Check-In / Registration CEED
0900 – 0910 Welcome & Introductions Garey
0910 – 0920 Administrative Notes CEED
0920 – 0950 CEED/OTA Overview CEED
0945 – 1010 UIPE FoS Update Garey
1010 – 1015 Lessons Learned Shirey
1015 – 1045 Government Prototypes Welch
1045 – 1115 Warfighter Kits Service Reps
1115 – 1200 Q&A
1200 – 1300 Lunch Break
1300 – 1600 Industry and JPM P Meetings
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 2
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
• This Industry Day is for information and planning purposes only.• This is not an Invitation for Bid or a Request for Proposal and is
not to be taken as a commitment by the Government to issue an order or otherwise pay for the information solicited.
• The Government shall not be liable for, or suffer any consequential damages for any technical information (e.g., limited and/or restricted rights) submitted as a result of this Industry Day.
• Questions & Answers. The Government reserves the right to defer answers until questions are properly staffed.
Disclaimer
3170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Acquisition Strategy
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 4
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Mission Area Teams & Profile Breakdown
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
Mission Area Mission Profiles1 - Direct Combat Ops2 - Long Range Combat Ops3 - Mounted4 - Sensitive Site Exploration
1 – Amphibious2 – Seagoing3 – Landing Craft Air Cushion
1 – Tactical/Ejection Seat2 – Rotary Wing3 – Non-Ejection Fixed Wing
Homeland Defense Path Forward TBD
Air Mission Area Team
Sea Mission Area Team
Land Mission Area Team
Number of solutions to be determined5
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
• Durability• Reduced operational burden• Improved dexterity (hand wear and footwear)• Improved mobility• Liquid, vapor, and aerosol protection• Integration with Personal Protective Equipment• System integration with assigned equipment
– Touchscreen– Weapons– Communications equipment– Heavy equipment
• Optimize shape, size, and weight for packaging• Saltwater (Sea)• Airworthiness (Air)
Common Attributes Across Mission Areas
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 6
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Land Mission Area Team
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
No or short warning time of CBRN attack
MOPP gear exchange in austere environments
Decrease light/noise/infrared signature
Potential for early warning of CBRN attack
No armor (most cases)
24 hour continuous op cycle
Mobility in confined spaces
Flame resistant protection
Tactical Level A minimal
Exposure/ handling of bulk agent
NFPA 1991 certificationDecontam-inationoperations*APOD: Aerial Port of
DebarkationSPOD: Sea Port of DebarkationRSOI: Reception, Staging, Onward movement and Integration
*
7
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
The Direct Combat Ops profile under the Land Mission Area is the focus of the first Request for
White Paper call.
The Direct Combat Ops mission area is characterized as taking place in forward operating areas while
within range of a concentrated CBRN attack. Warfighters usually have little or no warning time of
CBRN attack. This means MOPP gear exchange happens in austere environments
Direct Combat Ops Profile
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 8
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Air Mission Area Team
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
Integration with G-Suits
Ejection survivability/performance
Performance at altitude
Transition to ground ops
Integration with aircraft restraint systems
Rotor wash
Significant petroleum, oil, lubricant exposure
Parachuteintegration
Long missionduration
9
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
The Air Mission Area is looking for solutions that provide percutaneous protection, while integrating
with and permitting the proper functionality of aircrew life support systems. Additionally, the solution should permit necessary mobility for
operation of modern weapon systems to permit mission execution. Lastly, the solution should integrate with survival equipment in the post
ejection/bailout/ditch environment.
Aircrew Mission Area
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 10
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Sea Mission Area Team
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
Minimal organic logisticalsupport (resupply)
Sand/fine gritty substanceexposure
Extended operating range from ships
Expedient donning
High probability for POL Exposure; Fire suppressant exposure
Expedient distro from storage
In water survivability (drowning)
Non-skid exposure
Integration with pilot/co-pilot equipment
11
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Mission Profile Area (MPA)Identification Schedule
DP #1 03/27/17
Schedule DP01/31/18
Award08/01/17
White Paper Development, Review and Award
Get Prototypes/Materials and Begin GMT
Mission Area Teams
Formed05/01/17
12
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Challenge Details
The Proof Challenge asked the public for innovative ideas for solutions that improve
– Mobility– Dexterity– Tactility– Heat management– Integration of components
Sought to reach non-traditional sources such as small companies, students, entrepreneurs
13
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
• Proof Challenge was a successful venture• Awarded a total of $250,000 to 12 teams/individuals
– 10 prizes for promising concepts– 2 side prizes for Game Changer and Social Influencer
• Several non-winners caughtinterest of scientists forfurther exploration
Bottom Line Up Front
For a complete list of challenge winners please visit the Proof Challenge website or Proof Challenge Facebook page
14
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Lessons Learned from Government S&T Efforts
• Valuable data derived from Government S&T projects over last several years– Integrated Protective Fabric Systems (IPFS) program focused
on developing prototype Chemical Biological (CB) protective garments with novel design concepts to identify and quantify trade space relative to thermal burden, and human factors
• Range of materials, treatments, and designs were evaluated
– Chemical and Biological Lightweight Improved Thermal Ensemble (CBLITE) focused on maximizing thermal performance with protection against a lower challenge level for a shorter duration
• Overview of key take-aways today, more to come 170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 15
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 16
Lessons LearnedVapor and Aerosol Protection
Use of aerosol protective materials WITH improved garment design yields better aerosol protection • Vapor protection can be increased via garment design features (use of
tortuous path layered interfaces with gloves, boots and mask)• 2-piece designs achieved similar aerosol protection to 1-piece designs when a
layered interface is used in the waist region of the 2 piece design• Using a CB undergarment with a CB overgarment increases aerosol protection
Integrated and detachable hood designs offer similar aerosol protection when a layered interface is used in the neck region
• Zipper vents, when backed with sorptive material, increase protection
Key area for improving aerosol protection is the hood-mask interface. • Use multiple layers of material in the temple region. • Use a second skin on the JSGPM AND improve design of the hood. • Closures that intersect with the hood-mask interface should be improved or
eliminated if possible.
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 17
Lessons LearnedThermal Performance
• Multiple fabric layers increases thermal burden
• Laminated layers minimize thermal burden compared to separate layers by eliminating insulative air gaps, but both liquid and vapor chemical protective performance is also decreased
• Conformal garment design (close fit) decreases thermal burden by elimination of insulative air gaps
• Reduction of garment features (pockets, abrasion patches, etc.), especially in the hip region, decreases thermal burden
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
• Stretch fabric can increase range of motion and comfort.
• Contaminated doffing must be considered. Conformal garments are more difficult to doff and likely require cut-out procedures.
– Problematic areas include inner cuff assemblies that are tight or difficult to access (hood, ankle, wrist, zipper under flaps) or inflexible garment components.
• Must consider design constraints when locating zipper vents on a garment (i.e. cannot be covered by body armor, mask carrier, other worn gear)
– Zipper vents must be easily seen and closed.
• All hardware must be easily manipulated with a gloved hand
• Glove design/material are key areas for improvement in dexterity, thermal comfort
Lessons LearnedHuman Factors
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 18
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
• Durability impacts thermal burden, bulk, and cost
• Laundering can reduce chemical protective performance
• Treatments and coatings can improve hygiene as well as resistance to battlefield contaminants, and may improve chemical protective performance
Lessons LearnedDurability and Hygiene
170419 UIPE FoS Industry Day Garey 19