Uniform Facility Data Set, 1998: [United States] -...

Uniform Facility Data Set, 1998:[United States]

United States Department of Health andHuman Services. Substance Abuse andMental Health Services Administration.Office of Applied Studies

Codebook

is sponsored by

Terms of Use These data are distributed under the following terms of use. By continuing past this page, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements as stated below:

Privacy of Research Subjects Any intentional identification of a research subject (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of his or her confidential information violates the promise of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. Disclosure of confidential information may also be punishable under federal law. Therefore, users of data agree:

To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for re-identification of specific research subjects.

To make no use of the identity of any research subject discovered inadvertently and toreport any such discovery to CBHSQ and SAMHDA ([email protected])

Citing Data You agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any of your publications that use SAMHDA data. Authors of publications that use SAMHDA data are required to send citations of their published works for inclusion in a database of related publications.

Disclaimer You acknowledge that SAMHSA will bear no responsibility for your use of the data or for your interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

mailto:[email protected]



Violations If CBHSQ determines that this terms of use agreement has been violated, then possible sanctions

could include:

Report of the violation to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, orHuman Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution. A range of sanctions areavailable to institutions including revocation of tenure and termination.

If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, then report of the violationmay be made to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections. This may result inan investigation of the user's institution, which can result in institution-wide sanctionsincluding the suspension of all research grants.

Report of the violation of federal law to the United States Attorney General for possibleprosecution.

Court awarded payments of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by thebreach of confidential data.

Definitions CBHSQ

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality

Promise of confidentiality

A promise to a respondent or research participant that the information the respondent provides will not be disseminated in identifiable form without the permission of the respondent; that the fact that the respondent participated in the study will not be disclosed; and that disseminated information will include no linkages to the identity of the respondent. Such a promise encompasses traditional notions of both confidentiality and anonymity. In most cases, federal law protects the confidentiality of the respondent's identity as referenced in the Promise of Confidentiality. Under this condition, names and other identifying information regarding respondents would be confidential.

Research subject A person or organization that participates in a research study. A research subject may also be called a respondent. A respondent is generally a survey respondent or informant, experimental or observational subject, focus group participant, or any other person providing information to a study.

SAMHDA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive

SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Information about Copyrighted Content

Some instruments administered as part of this study may contain in whole or substantially in part contents from copyrighted instruments. Reproductions of the instruments are provided as documentation for the analysis of the data associated with this collection. Restrictions on "fair use" apply to all copyrighted content. More information about the reproduction of copyrighted works by educators and librarians is available from the United States Copyright Office.

NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement.

***Processor Notes*** Uniform Facility Data Set, 1998

1) The codebook introduction refers to SAS (v.6.08), SAS transport, and ASCIItab delimited versions of the public use data file. This reference is to files that were originally created by the data producer and are not part of this release. To provide the data to users in a format that is neither system- nor platform-specific, the data file is in rectangular ASCII text format with SAS and SPSS data definition statements.

2) To maintain consistency with previously published numbers, one recordcontaining an erroneous value of "-1" for O_RE1 and WHITE has been left on the file unedited.

3) UFDS SERIES INFORMATION: The data elements and format that make up the coreof the UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET (UFDS) were first used in 1976 as part of survey efforts designed to measure the scope and use of drug abuse treatment services in the United States. This core was used throughout the 1970s and 1980s in several different surveys. In 1987, the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Unit Survey (NDATUS) was first administered and was then conducted annually from 1989 to 1993. After the creation of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in 1992, NDATUS was redesigned and, since 1995, has been conducted annually as the UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET (UFDS) survey. UFDS is one of three components of SAMHSA's Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) and is designed to provide the mechanism for quantifying the substance abuse treatment delivery system in the United States. DASIS was created in 1995 to facilitate the integration of SAMHSA's existing treatment services datasets and to reduce redundancy in data collection and reporting. The other two DASIS components are the National Master Facility Inventory (NMFI) and the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS). The NMFI is a comprehensive listing of all known substance abuse treatment, education, and prevention facilities in the United States. The TEDS is a client-level database of individuals admitted to publicly-funded substance abuse treatment facilities and is available from the SAMHDA Web site. Together, these three DASIS components provide national- and state-level data on persons receiving alcohol and substance abuse treatment as well as data on the facilities providing the treatment.

Drug and Alcohol Services Information System

Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS):1998

Public Use File Documentation

Office of Applied Studies

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

OFFICE OF APPLIED STUDIES

Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): 1998

Public Use File Documentation

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

5600 Fishers Lane, Room 16-105Rockville, Maryland 20857

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... .1.1 UFDS in the Context of DASIS................................................................................. .1.2 NMFI-Imposed Constraints on UFDS....................................................................... .1.3 Unit of response .................................................................................................... .1.3 Scope of facilities included................................................................................... .1.4 Procedures for the 1998 UFDS.................................................................................. .1.4 Field period and reference date............................................................................. .1.4 Survey coverage.................................................................................................... .1.4 Content.................................................................................................................. .1.5 Data collection ...................................................................................................... .1.5 Forms accounting and response rate ..................................................................... .1.6 Quality assurance .................................................................................................. .1.6 Item non-response................................................................................................. .1.7 Profile of Responding Facilities................................................................................. .1.7 Further Data Considerations and Limitations ............................................................ .1.7 Chapter 2. FREQUENCY TABLES ....................................................................... 2.1 Appendix A. UFDS 1998 Questionnaire ................................................................ A.1 Appendix B. Organizational Setting.......................................................................B.1

1.1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The 1998 Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS)survey was conducted between October 1998and March 1999, with a reference date ofOctober 1, 1998. It was the 22nd in a series ofnational surveys designed to measure thelocation, characteristics, and use of alcoholismand drug abuse treatment facilities and servicesthroughout the United States, the District ofColumbia, and other U.S. jurisdictions.1 TheOffice of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse andMental Health Services Administration(SAMHSA), plans and directs the UFDS survey.

UFDS has evolved from national survey effortsbegun in the 1970s by the National Institute onDrug Abuse (NIDA) to measure the scope anduse of drug abuse treatment services in theUnited States. The sixth of these surveys,conducted in 1976, introduced the data elementsand format that have formed the core ofsubsequent surveys. These includeorganizational setting, service orientation,services available, clients in treatment by type ofcare, capacity, and annual revenue sources andamounts. The 1976 survey, called the NationalDrug Abuse Treatment Utilization Survey, wasrepeated in 1977 and 1978. In 1979, theNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse andAlcoholism (NIAAA) became a co-sponsor ofthe survey, alcoholism treatment facilities were

added, and the study was renamed the NationalDrug and Alcoholism Treatment UtilizationSurvey. This survey was repeated in 1980 and1982. In 1984, a one-page version was used (theNational Alcoholism and Drug Abuse ProgramInventory). In 1987, the full version of thesurvey was reinstated, and it was renamed theNational Drug and Alcoholism Treatment UnitSurvey (NDATUS). NDATUS was conductedannually from 1989-1993. In 1992, with thecreation of SAMHSA, responsibility forconducting the survey shifted to SAMHSA’sOffice of Applied Studies. The survey wasredesigned, and conducted annually as theUniform Facility Data Set survey beginning in1995.

UFDS is designed to collect information fromeach facility in the United States that providessubstance abuse treatment, and from State-identified facilities providing other substanceabuse services.2 UFDS includes private andpublicly-funded facilities. All facilities reportidentifying information and ownership.Treatment facilities also report data on the typeof services provided, numbers of clients, clientdemographics (i.e., age, sex, and race/ethnicitygroups), other client characteristics, number ofbeds, and sources and amounts of revenue.

1 The jurisdictions include the territories of AmericanSamoa and Guam, the Federated States ofMicronesia, the Republic of Palau, theCommonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the VirginIslands of the United States.

2 In this report, entities responding to UFDS arereferred to as “facilities.” This designation isconsistent with the title of the survey, although, asdiscussed later in the report, a “facility” may be aprogram-level, clinic-level, or multi-site respondent.

1.2

UFDS provides the mechanism for quantifyingthe dynamic character and composition of theUnited States substance abuse treatment deliverysystem. The UFDS objectives are:

1. to assist SAMHSA and State and localgovernments in assessing the nature andextent of services provided in State-supported and other treatment facilities, andin forecasting treatment resourcerequirements;

2. to update SAMHSA’s National MasterFacility Inventory (NMFI) of all known drugabuse and alcoholism treatment facilities andState-identified facilities providing othersubstance abuse services (described furtherbelow);

3. to analyze general treatment services trendsand to conduct comparative analyses for thenation, regions, and States;

4. to generate the National Directory of DrugAbuse and Alcoholism Treatment Programs,a compendium of State-tracked facilitiesproviding substance abuse treatment; and

5. to update the information in SAMHSA’sSubstance Abuse Treatment FacilityLocator, a searchable database of substanceabuse treatment facilities available on theInternet at:

http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov

UFDS in the Context of the Drug and AlcoholServices Information System (DASIS)

UFDS is one of the three components ofSAMHSA’s Drug and Alcohol ServicesInformation System (DASIS). The core ofDASIS is the National Master Facility Inventory(NMFI), a continuously-updated, comprehensive

listing of all known substance abuse treatmentfacilities and some State-identified preventionand education facilities. The other componentsof DASIS are the UFDS survey and theTreatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), a client-level database of persons admitted to substanceabuse treatment. A unique ID number assignedto the NMFI facility is used in the collection offacility-level data (UFDS) and client-level data(TEDS) so that the three data sets can be linked.Together, they provide national- and State-levelinformation on the numbers and characteristicsof individuals admitted to alcohol and drugtreatment programs and describe the facilitiesthat deliver care to those individuals.

The NMFI is the list frame for UFDS. Facilitiesin the NMFI fall into four general categories.These are distinguished by the services provided,the components of DASIS of which they arepart, and the relationship of the facility to itsState substance abuse agency. These categoriesare described below.

Treatment facilities administratively tracked by States and reporting to TEDS

The largest group of facilities (about 9,500 in1998) includes facilities that are licensed orcertified by the State substance abuse agency toprovide substance abuse treatment (or areadministratively tracked for other reasons), andare required by the States to provide TEDSclient-level data. State DASIS representativesmaintain this segment of the NMFI by reportingnew facilities, closures, and address changes toSAMHSA.

Treatment facilities administratively tracked by States but not reporting to TEDS

This group (about 3,600 facilities in 1998)includes treatment facilities that are licensed,certified, or otherwise approved by the State

1.3

substance abuse agency (or are administrativelytracked for other reasons), but that are notrequired by the States to provide TEDS client-level data. Some private for-profit facilities fallinto this category. This group also includesprograms operated by Federal agencies (theBureau of Prisons, the Department of VeteransAffairs (VA), the Department of Defense, andthe Indian Health Service). NMFI records forFederally-operated facilities are updated annuallythrough lists provided by these agencies.

Treatment facilities not administratively tracked by States

This group of facilities (about 3,000 in 1998)represents the ongoing SAMHSA effort to makethe NMFI as comprehensive as possible byincluding treatment facilities that States, for avariety of reasons, do not track. Many of thesefacilities are private for-profit, small grouppractices, or hospital-based programs. Most ofthem were identified through screening ofalternative source databases such as thecommercial American Business Index, the annualAmerican Hospital Association survey, andSAMHSA’s biennial Inventory of Mental HealthOrganizations. Additional facilities are alsoidentified during the UFDS by surveyparticipants, who are asked to report all of thetreatment facilities in their administrativenetworks. States are given the opportunity toreview these facilities and to add them to theState-tracked list if appropriate.

Non-treatment facilities administratively tracked by States

These facilities (about 2,900 in 1998) provideprevention, education, intake, assessment,referral, or administrative services. The listing ofthis group of facilities is provided by StateDASIS representatives.

NMFI-Imposed Constraints on UFDS

The use of the NMFI as the list frame for UFDSimposes certain constraints related to the unit ofresponse and the scope of facilities included. TheNMFI is largely a compilation of facilities inState administrative systems, and each State hasa different system and different criteria foreligibility.

Unit of response

SAMHSA requests that facilities be included inthe NMFI, UFDS, and TEDS at the sameadministrative level so that record linkage amongthe three data sets is valid. SAMHSA furtherrequests States to use the point of delivery ofservice (i.e., physical location) as the definingfactor for a facility. However, because of thedifferent State administrative systems, there is noconsistent use of this definition. For example, insome States, multiple treatment programs (e.g.,detoxification, residential, and outpatient) at thesame address and under the same managementhave separate State licenses. These are treated asseparate by the State, and are given separateNMFI ID numbers. In other States, multiplesites are included as a single entity under aparent or administrative unit. In many of thesecases, individual sites can report client andservices data in the UFDS survey, but revenuedata are available only at a higher administrativelevel.

Until 1996, State substance abuse agenciesdistributed and collected the UFDS surveyforms. Beginning in 1996, data collection wascentralized and UFDS forms were sent directlyto the facilities.

The UFDS is designed to collect data for eachphysical location where treatment services areprovided. A small percentage of facilities elected

1.4

to report data at a higher administrative levelthan the State-determined NMFI facility level.

Thus UFDS data on the numbers of facilitiesmust be interpreted with caution. Assessment ofchanges over time may be more valid, assumingthat individual States retain consistentdefinitions.

Scope of facilities included

The great majority of facilities in the NMFI aretreatment facilities administratively tracked byStates. Therefore, the scope of facilities includedin the NMFI is affected by differences in Statesystems of licensure, certification, accreditation,and the disbursement of public funds. Forexample, some State substance abuse agenciesregulate private facilities and individualpractitioners while others do not. In someStates, hospital-based substance abuse treatmentfacilities are not licensed through the Statesubstance abuse agency. Some State substanceabuse agencies track correctional facilities (Stateprisons and local jails) while others do not.

In an effort to address these differences,SAMHSA conducted a large-scale effort during1995 and 1996 to identify substance abusetreatment facilities that, for a variety of reasons,were not on the NMFI. Some 15 source listswere considered, and facilities not on the NMFIwere contacted to ascertain whether theyprovided substance abuse treatment. Asexpected, this yielded a number of hospital-based and small private facilities that were noton the NMFI. These facilities were sent theUFDS survey beginning in 1995, but they werenot included in the published results of thesurvey until 1997.

A similar effort, on a smaller scale, wasconducted prior to the 1998 UFDS. For thateffort, potential new facilities were identified

using data from the American Business Index(ABI), the annual American HospitalAssociation survey, and SAMHSA’s Inventoryof Mental Health Organizations, which were thethree source lists from 1995-1996 that had yield-ed the most new facilities. This search resulted inthe addition of 1,290 facilities to the 1998UFDS. In addition, potential new facilities hadbeen identified during the 1997 UFDS, duringscreening calls to facilities to confirm eligibility,and from other sources.

Some facilities operated by Federal agencies (theBureau of Prisons, the VA, the Department ofDefense, and the Indian Health Service) aretracked, but not regulated, by the States. NMFIrecords for Federally-operated facilities areupdated annually through lists provided by theseFederal agencies. Facilities operated by theBureau of Prisons were excluded from the 1998UFDS because SAMHSA conducted a separatesurvey of correctional facilities.1

Procedures for the 1998 UFDS

Field period and reference date

The field period for the 1998 UFDS ran fromOctober 1998 through March 1999, with areference date of October 1, 1998. Follow-upcalls to facilities for correction of missing anderroneous data continued through June 1999.

Survey coverage The UFDS survey was sent to all active facilitiesthat were on the NMFI as of about six weeks

1 Office of Applied Studies, SAMHSA (2000).Substance Abuse Treatment in Adult and JuvenileCorrectional Facilities: Findings from the UniformFacility Data Set 1997 Survey of CorrectionalFacilities. Drug and Alcohol Services InformationSystem Series: S-9.

1.5

before the survey reference date (October 1,1998).

Content

The 1998 UFDS survey instrument was a 10-page document with 39 numbered questions (seeAppendix A). Respondents provided informationon treatment services and on clients receivingcare on October 1, 1998. Topics included:

! Facility identification information! Substance abuse services (treatment,

detoxification, prevention, administrative,other)

! Ownership! Hotline operation! Organizational setting! Managed care participation! Specific services provided (assessment,

therapy, testing, health services, programsfor special groups, etc.)

! General types of treatment provided(outpatient, hospital, residential)

! Organizational relationships (parent oraffiliate(s); financial parent or affiliate(s))

! 12-month unduplicated client count! 12-month admissions! Outpatient treatment clients as of the survey

reference date, including:• Client counts by type of care

(detoxification, intensive, and otheroutpatient)

• Number receiving methadone/LAAM• Client counts by demographics (age

group, sex, race/ethnicity) ! Hospital inpatient clients as of the survey

reference date, including:• Beds designated for substance abuse

clients• Client counts by type of care

(detoxification, rehabilitation)• Number receiving methadone/LAAM

• Client counts by demographics (agegroup, sex, race/ethnicity)

! Residential clients as of the survey referencedate, including:• Beds designated for substance abuse

clients• Client counts by type of care

(detoxification, rehabilitation)• Number receiving methadone/LAAM• Client counts by demographics (age

group, sex, race/ethnicity) ! Proportions treated for alcohol only, drug

only, and both substances! Proportions of clients in selected population

sub-groups (injection drug users, personswith active TB, HIV-positive clients, clientsin treatment previously, managed careclients, correctional clients, pregnant wo-men, mothers with dependent children)

! Annual revenue sources and amounts

Data collection

Prior to the survey, faxes or letters were sent toall facilities to update address information, andto alert facilities to expect the survey. Datacollection instruments (with State letters ofendorsement or other enclosures) were mailed toeach facility. During the data collection phase,contract personnel were available to answerfacilities’ questions concerning the survey. Fourweeks after the initial mailing, thankyou/reminder letters were sent to all facilities.Five to six weeks after the initial mailing, non-responding facilities were sent a second mailing.About five weeks after the second mailing, non-respondents received a reminder telephone call.Those facilities that had not responded withintwo to three weeks of the reminder call weretelephoned and asked to complete a slightlyabbreviated version of the survey by telephone.

1.6

Forms accounting and response rate

Summary response rate information is presentedin Table 1.1. Questionnaires were mailed to atotal of 21,825 facilities believed to offersubstance abuse services (treatment and non-treatment). Of these facilities, 12 percent werefound to be ineligible for the survey, eitherbecause they had closed or because they werenot providing substance abuse services onOctober 1, 1998. Of the remaining 19,174facilities, the responses are distributed asfollows:

• Fifty-four percent of facilities completed thefull mail survey and 24 percent completedthe abbreviated telephone survey.

• Seven percent of facilities completed the firstsections of the questionnaire on facilitycharacteristics (ownership, setting, services,etc.) but did not provide separate clientcounts—another administratively linkedfacility reported client counts for bothfacilities combined. These facilities and theirclient counts are included in all tables in thisreport.

• Two percent of facilities did not return aquestionnaire for themselves, but otherfacilities reported that they had included theclient counts for the non-reporting facilitieswith their client counts. In this report, thefacilities that did not report for themselvesare not included in the counts of facilities,but their client count data are included.

• Three percent of facilities reported that theyprovided treatment, but no client count datawere reported for them. These responses arenot included in this report.

• No response of any kind was received from10 percent of facilities presumed to beeligible for the survey (the effective sample).

Quality assurance

All mail questionnaires were reviewed forinconsistencies and missing data. Calls weremade to facilities to obtain missing data and toclarify questionable responses. After data entry,automated quality assurance reviews wereconducted. These included the rules used inmanual editing, plus consistency checks not

Table 1.1Survey forms accounting and response rate:

UFDS 1998

Number

Percentof

totalforms

Percentof

effectivesample

Total forms distributed

21,825 100.0

Closed/ineligible 2,651 12.1

Effective sample 19,174 87.9 100.0

Usable responses 16,762 76.8 87.4

Complete data 16,337 74.9 85.2

Mail 10,376 47.5 54.1

Telephone 4,618 21.2 24.1

Split response1 1,343 6.2 7.0

Partial data (client counts only)2 425 1.9 2.2

Unusable responses3 559 2.6 2.9

Non-respondents 1,853 8.5 9.7

1. Completed facility characteristic questions; client andrevenue data were reported by another facility.2. Client count reported by another facility.3. No client counts submitted.

readily implemented by manual review. As a finalcheck, the data were returned to the Statesubstance abuse agencies for their review.

1.7

If facilities could not be reached during the editcallbacks, responses that were clearly in errorwere deleted and imputed.

Item non-response

The editing process ensured that item non-response was minimal. A few facilities did notprovide client demographics; missing data wereimputed using averaged responses from facilitiesin the same State and with similar ownership andclient mix characteristics.

Profile of Responding Facilities

The Public Use File includes data on the 13,455facilities that provide treatment and/ordetoxification services (78 percent of reportingfacilities), either alone or in conjunction withother substance abuse services. Because some ofthese facilities reported client counts foraffiliated facilities, the client counts actuallyinclude data on 13,880 facilities.

Most of the responding treatment/detox facilities(78 percent) completed the full survey, while 22percent completed the telephone survey (seeAppendix A).

Further Data Considerations and Limitations

As with any data collection effort, certainprocedural considerations and data limitationsmust be taken into account when interpretingdata from the 1998 UFDS. Some of these areoutlined above. Some general issues arediscussed here; considerations and limitations ofspecific data items are discussed where the dataare presented.

• UFDS attempts to obtain responses from allknown treatment and prevention facilities,but it is a voluntary survey. There is noadjustment for facility non-response.

• Careful editing, and extensive follow-uphave greatly reduced item non-response.There are instances of non-response in mostdata items, however, and some variableshave an explicit Unknown response option.In addition, respondents contacted bytelephone completed a slightly abbreviatedversion of the survey (see Appendix A). Toavoid the loss of usable information, allresponding facilities that reported clientcounts were retained in the database.Missing data on client demographics wereimputed.

• UFDS is a point-prevalence survey. It pro-vides information on the substance abusetreatment system and its clients on the refer-ence date. Client counts do not representannual totals. Rather, UFDS provides a‘snapshot’ of substance abuse treatmentfacilities and clients on an average day.

• UFDS collects data about facilities, notindividual clients. Data on clients representan aggregate of clients in treatment for eachreporting facility. Demographic data arecollected in different matrices of the surveyform and cannot be cross-tabulated. While itis possible to report how many female clientsand how many clients under age 18 were intreatment at a facility, the number of femaleclients under 18 cannot be determined.

• Multiple responses were allowed for certainvariables (e.g., services provided, facilitysetting, and specialized programs).Frequencies for these variables include thetotal number of facilities reporting eachresponse.

Uniform Facility Data Set, 1998: [United States]

Variable Description and Frequencies

Note: Frequencies displayed for the variables are not weighted.They are purely descriptive andmay not be representative of thestudy population. Please review any sampling or weightinginformation available with the study.

Summary statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, median, andstandard deviation) may not be available for every variable inthe codebook. Conversely, a listing of frequencies in table formatmay not be present for every variable in the codebook either.However, all variables in the dataset are present and displaysufficient information about each variable. These decisions aremade intentionally and are at the discretion of the archiveproducing this codebook.

- 1 -

http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/can-i-use-this-question-in-building-my.html

CASEID: CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

Based upon 13,455 valid cases out of 13,455 total cases.

Location: 1-5 (width: 5; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric

MODE: 1=Phone Complete 2=Mail Complete

Survey data collected by:

%UnweightedFrequency

LabelValue

22.1 %2972Telephone1

77.9 %10483Mail survey2

Missing Data

100%13,455Total


• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Location: 6-7 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric(Range of) Missing Values: -9

STFIPS: STATE

State FIPS codes consistent with those used by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.


LabelValue

0.8 %110ALABAMA1

0.5 %73ALASKA2

0.0 %0ARKANSAS3

1.6 %212ARIZONA4

0.6 %75ARKANSAS5

10.9 %1462CALIFORNIA6

0.0 %0CONNECTICUT7

1.6 %221COLORADO8

1.9 %253CONNECTICUT9

0.3 %46DELAWARE10

0.4 %60DIST OF COLUMBIA11

4.5 %610FLORIDA12

1.7 %227GEORGIA13

0.0 %0IDAHO14

0.5 %73HAWAII15

0.4 %58IDAHO16

4.1 %557ILLINOIS17

2.3 %313INDIANA18

- 2 -


LabelValue

0.9 %123IOWA19

1.3 %178KANSAS20

1.9 %259KENTUCKY21

1.3 %172LOUISIANA22

1.2 %162MAINE23

2.6 %346MARYLAND24

2.7 %370MASSACHUSETTS25

4.8 %642MICHIGAN26

2.1 %283MINNESOTA27

0.7 %93MISSISSIPPI28

1.9 %259MISSOURI29

0.4 %58MONTANA30

0.8 %113NEBRASKA31

0.7 %96NEVADA32

0.6 %77NEW HAMPSHIRE33

2.3 %314NEW JERSEY34

0.9 %124NEW MEXICO35

9.2 %1235NEW YORK36

2.0 %271NORTH CAROLINA37

0.4 %51NORTH DAKOTA38

4.1 %552OHIO39

1.2 %161OKLAHOMA40

1.4 %194OREGON41

4.0 %544PENNSYLVANIA42

0.0 %0SOUTH DAKOTA43

0.5 %65RHODE ISLAND44

0.6 %79SOUTH CAROLINA45

0.5 %64SOUTH DAKOTA46

1.6 %211TENNESSEE47

5.0 %673TEXAS48

1.0 %137UTAH49

0.3 %46VERMONT50

Missing Data

100%13,455Total

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, pleaseanalyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).



Location: 8-9 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 3 -

Variable Type: numeric(Range of) Missing Values: -9

TREATMT: On 10/1/98-Provided Treatment Services

On October 1, 1998 which of the following substance abuse services were provided by this facility, that is, the facility named on thefront cover? MARK ALL THAT APPLY


LabelValue

98.7 %13275Yes1

1.3 %180No2

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




DETOX: On 10/1/98-Provided Detox Services



LabelValue

22.0 %2959Yes1

78.0 %10496No2

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




PREVNTN: On 10/1/98-Provided Prevention Services



LabelValue

58.9 %7931Yes1

40.9 %5501No2

- 4 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %23MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




OTHNONTX: On 10/1/98-Provided Other Services



LabelValue

91.8 %12356Yes1

8.1 %1088No2

Missing Data

0.1 %11MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




OWNERSHP: Ownership

Who owns this facility? MARK ONE ONLY


LabelValue

28.1 %3775A private-for-profit organization1

55.7 %7489A private non-profit organization2

4.4 %589State government3

8.2 %1105Local, county or community government4

1.3 %180Tribal government5

2.4 %317Federal government6

Missing Data

100%13,455Total

- 5 -




FEDOWN: Federal Government Agency

Which federal government agency? MARK ONE ONLY


LabelValue

1.1 %149Department of Veterans Affairs1

1.0 %128Department of Defense2

0.0 %0Bureau of prisons3

0.2 %30Indian Health Service4

0.1 %10Other5

Missing Data

97.6 %13138MISSING-9

100%13,455Total

Based upon 317 valid cases out of 13,455 total cases.



LOC1: Setting, General Hospital

Which setting (or settings) BEST describes this substance abusetreatment facility?

General Hospital


LabelValue

9.1 %1228Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

90.9 %12227MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


• Minimum: 1

- 6 -

• Maximum: 1


LOC2: Setting, Psychiatric Hospital


Psychiatric hospital


LabelValue

3.8 %512Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

96.2 %12943MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC3: Setting, Other Specialized Hospital


Other specialized hospital (for example, alcoholism, maternity,children's, orthopedic)


LabelValue

4.5 %600Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

95.5 %12855MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 7 -


LOC4: Setting, Outpatient Facility


OUTPATIENT facility specializing in substance abuse treatment


LabelValue

55.2 %7431Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

44.8 %6024MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC5: Setting, Halfway House


Halfway house


LabelValue

5.7 %765Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

94.3 %12690MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 8 -

LOC6: Setting, Residential Facility


RESIDENTIAL (non-hospital) substance abuse treatment facility


LabelValue

11.5 %1547Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

88.5 %11908MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC7: TC Included - Yes/No


Therapeutic community


LabelValue

9.5 %1275Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

90.5 %12180MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC8: Setting, Mental Health Center

- 9 -


Community MENTAL health center or other mental health facilitythat provides a variety of services


LabelValue

19.8 %2667Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

80.2 %10788MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC9: Setting, Health Center


Community Health Center, including Migrant Health Center, UrbanIndian Program, Health Care for the Homeless Center


LabelValue

1.8 %248Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

98.2 %13207MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC10: Setting, School

- 10 -


School (elementary, secondary, college/university)


LabelValue

2.6 %354Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

97.4 %13101MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC11: Setting, Religious Organization


Community or religious organization/agency that provides avariety of social services


LabelValue

4.9 %660Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

95.1 %12795MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC12: Setting, Jail or Prison

Which setting (or settings) BEST describes this substance abuse

- 11 -

treatment facility?

Jail, prison or juvenile detention center


LabelValue

3.3 %445Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

96.7 %13010MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC13: Setting, Other Criminal Justice


Other criminal justice (TASC, pretrial diversion, court referral,probation, parole, community corrections, drug courts)


LabelValue

6.3 %851Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

93.7 %12604MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC14: Setting, Private Group Practice


- 12 -

Private practice - group


LabelValue

7.4 %997Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

92.6 %12458MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC15: Setting, Private Solo Practice


Private practice - solo


LabelValue

6.2 %832Yes1

0.0 %0No2

Missing Data

93.8 %12623MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




LOC16: Setting, Other Private Setting


Other setting

- 13 -


LabelValue

2.9 %385Yes1

97.1 %13062No2

Missing Data

0.1 %8MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




MGMCARE: Facility Owned by Mgd Care Organztion

Is this facility owned or operated by a managed care organization (for example, an HMO)?


LabelValue

1.3 %170Yes1

98.6 %13273No2

Missing Data

0.1 %12MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




WRITARRA: Facility Have Contracts w/Mgd Care

On October 1, 1998, did this facility have letters of agreement or contacts with managed care organizations for providing substanceabuse treatment services?


LabelValue

44.5 %5987Yes1

47.0 %6321No2

0.0 %0Don't know3

Missing Data

8.5 %1147MISSING-9

100%13,455Total

- 14 -




WRITNUM: How Many Mgd Care Contracts

With how many managed care organizations did you have formal written agreements or contracts? ###


LabelValue

5.8 %782-1

4.9 %660-2

4.7 %639-3

3.9 %521-4

3.8 %511-5

2.3 %303-6

1.5 %201-7

1.4 %185-8

0.4 %57-9

2.8 %382-10

0.3 %36-11

1.3 %179-12

0.5 %73-13

0.3 %38-14

1.4 %188-15

0.2 %22-16

0.2 %25-17

0.2 %31-18

0.1 %8-19

1.2 %161-20

0.2 %28-21

0.1 %17-22

0.1 %12-23

0.2 %23-24

0.6 %81-25

0.2 %26-26

0.1 %15-27

0.1 %14-28

0.0 %3-29

0.5 %72-30

0.0 %5-31

0.2 %22-32

- 15 -


LabelValue

0.1 %7-33

0.0 %3-34

0.2 %33-35

0.1 %12-36

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %6-38

0.1 %11-39

0.3 %36-40

0.0 %3-41

0.1 %8-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %6-44

0.1 %20-45

0.1 %9-46

0.0 %4-47

0.0 %5-48

0.3 %44-50

0.0 %3-51

Missing Data

57.7 %7768MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 10.77• Median: 5.00• Mode: 1.00• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 999• Standard Deviation: 22.63


OWNER: OWNERSHIP-VALUES REARRANGED FOR TABLES

Ownership variable with values rearranged for tables


LabelValue

55.7 %7489Private non-profit1

28.1 %3775Private for profit2

8.2 %1105Local, community government3

- 16 -


LabelValue

4.4 %589State Government4

2.4 %317Federal Government5

1.3 %180Tribal Government6

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




SETTING: SETTING-VALUES REARRANGED FOR TABLES

Setting values re-coded


LabelValue

27.6 %3720Outpatient1

13.9 %1875Residential2

2.6 %354Outpatient and residential3

14.9 %2004Community Mental Health Center4

10.4 %1395Solo / Group practice5

8.0 %1074General Hospital6

6.0 %802Psych Hospital7

6.0 %807Criminal Justice8

2.5 %338Community and religious9

0.8 %108Health Center10

7.3 %978Mixed / Other11

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




ADMIN: On 10/1/98-Provided Admin Services


- 17 -


LabelValue

77.8 %10472Yes1

22.0 %2964No2

Missing Data

0.1 %19MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC1: Assessment Comprehensive Sub Abuse

As of October 1, 1998, which of these services were beingprovided at this facility? MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Assessment services:

Comprehensive substance abuse assessment/diagnosis


LabelValue

71.5 %9616Yes1

6.4 %860No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2979MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC2: Assessment Mental Health



- 18 -

Comprehensive mental health assessment/diagnosis


LabelValue

35.0 %4704Yes1

42.9 %5769No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC3: Assessment Other



Other


LabelValue

2.2 %300Yes1

75.6 %10172No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2983MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC4: Therapy Family Counseling


Therapy:

- 19 -

Family counseling


LabelValue

57.0 %7668Yes1

20.9 %2807No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC5: Therapy Group


Therapy:

Group therapy


LabelValue

68.4 %9207Yes1

9.4 %1269No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2979MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC6: Therapy Individual


- 20 -

Therapy:

Individual therapy


LabelValue

72.6 %9772Yes1

5.2 %703No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC7: Therapy Pharmaco/Prescription Med


Therapy:

Pharmacotherapies/prescription medication


LabelValue

30.9 %4164Yes1

46.9 %6311No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC8: Therapy Relapse Prevention Groups


- 21 -

Therapy:

Relapse prevention groups


LabelValue

55.4 %7460Yes1

22.4 %3016No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2979MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC9: Therapy Other


Therapy:

Other (therapy)


LabelValue

5.7 %761Yes1

72.2 %9713No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC10: Testing Blood/Alcohol

As of October 1, 1998, which of these services were being

- 22 -

provided at this facility? MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Testing:

Blood alcohol


LabelValue

29.6 %3983Yes1

48.2 %6492No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC11: Testing Drug/Alcohol Urine Screen


Testing:

Drug/alcohol urine screening


LabelValue

57.7 %7770Yes1

20.1 %2705No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC12: Testing Hair Analysis

- 23 -


Testing:

Hair analysis


LabelValue

1.3 %177Yes1

76.5 %10296No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC13: Testing Hepatitis


Testing:

Hepatitis testing


LabelValue

14.6 %1968Yes1

63.2 %8505No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 24 -

SRVC14: Testing HIV


Testing:

HIV testing


LabelValue

24.3 %3264Yes1

53.6 %7210No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC15: Testing STD


Testing:

STD testing


LabelValue

16.5 %2220Yes1

61.3 %8254No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



Location: 95-96 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric

- 25 -

(Range of) Missing Values: -9

SRVC16: Testing TB Screening


Testing:

TB screening


LabelValue

28.5 %3830Yes1

49.4 %6644No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC17: Testing Other


Testing:

Other (test)


LabelValue

2.5 %330Yes1

75.4 %10143No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 26 -


SRVC18: Health Services Family Planning


Health services:

Family planning


LabelValue

5.0 %671Yes1

72.9 %9804No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC19: Health Services Medical Care


Health services:

Medical care


LabelValue

20.4 %2739Yes1

57.5 %7737No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2979MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 27 -


SRVC20: Health Services Prenatal Care


Health services:

Prenatal care


LabelValue

5.1 %688Yes1

72.7 %9787No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC21: Health Services Perinatal Care


Health services:

Perinatal care


LabelValue

3.7 %494Yes1

74.2 %9981No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 28 -


SRVC22: Health Services TB Treatment


Health services:

TB treatment


LabelValue

7.1 %951Yes1

70.8 %9524No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC23: Health Services Hlth Education


Health services:

Health education


LabelValue

36.6 %4924Yes1

41.3 %5552No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2979MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 29 -


SRVC24: Health Services HIV/AIDS Education


Health services:

HIV/AIDS education


LabelValue

40.3 %5429Yes1

37.5 %5046No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC25: Health Services Smoking Cessation


Health services:

Smoking cessation


LabelValue

16.4 %2207Yes1

61.4 %8268No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 30 -


SRVC26: Health Services Other


Health services:

Other (health service)


LabelValue

1.4 %187Yes1

76.5 %10288No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC27: Continuing Care Aftercare Counseling


Continuing care:

Aftercare counseling


LabelValue

56.3 %7574Yes1

21.6 %2900No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 31 -


SRVC28: Continuing Care Alumni(ae) Groups


Continuing care:

Alumni(ae) groups


LabelValue

17.6 %2371Yes1

60.2 %8103No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC29: Continuing Care Other


Continuing care:

Other (continuing care)


LabelValue

1.7 %230Yes1

76.1 %10243No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 32 -


SRVC36: Transitional Assist. Social Services


Transitional services:

Assistance with obtaining Social Services


LabelValue

32.9 %4430Yes1

44.9 %6044No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC37: Transitional Services Discharge Plan



Discharge planning


LabelValue

53.1 %7143Yes1

24.8 %3332No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 33 -


SRVC38: Transitional Services Employment



Employment counseling/training


LabelValue

23.2 %3126Yes1

54.6 %7349No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC39: Transitional Services Housing Assist



Housing assistance


LabelValue

19.5 %2626Yes1

58.3 %7848No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 34 -


SRVC40: Transitional Services Referral



Referral to other services


LabelValue

61.7 %8301Yes1

16.2 %2174No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC41: Transitional Services Other



Other (transitional service)


LabelValue

1.0 %135Yes1

76.8 %10337No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2983MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 35 -


SRVC42: Comm Outreach Drug/Alcohol Ed


Community Outreach:

Drug and alcohol education


LabelValue

49.3 %6631Yes1

28.6 %3843No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC43: Comm Outreach Early Intervention


Community Outreach:

Outreach/early intervention


LabelValue

26.4 %3552Yes1

51.5 %6923No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 36 -


SRVC44: Comm Outreach Medical Presentations


Community Outreach:

Media presentations (T.V., radio, brochures)


LabelValue

29.1 %3914Yes1

48.8 %6560No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC45: Comm Outreach Membership Prog


Community Outreach:

Membership in a community partnership program


LabelValue

25.3 %3407Yes1

52.5 %7067No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 37 -


SRVC46: Comm Outreach Other


Community Outreach:

Other (community outreach)


LabelValue

1.6 %209Yes1

76.3 %10264No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC47: Other Services Academic Ed/GED


Other Services:

Academic education/GED classes


LabelValue

11.6 %1556Yes1

66.3 %8919No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 38 -


SRVC48: Other Services Acupuncture


Other Services:

Acupuncture


LabelValue

3.4 %462Yes1

74.4 %10012No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC49: Other Services Case Management


Other Services:

Case management services


LabelValue

38.7 %5209Yes1

39.1 %5266No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 39 -


SRVC50: Other Services Child Care


Other Services:

Child care


LabelValue

6.8 %911Yes1

71.1 %9563No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC51: Other Services Communication Skill


Other Services:

Communication skills


LabelValue

26.1 %3506Yes1

51.8 %6968No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 40 -


SRVC52: Other Services Domestic Violence


Other Services:

Domestic violence - family/partner violence services


LabelValue

23.7 %3195Yes1

54.1 %7280No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC53: Other Services Home Visits


Other Services:

Home visits


LabelValue

16.0 %2147Yes1

61.9 %8327No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 41 -


SRVC54: Other Services Life Skills


Other Services:

Life skills for independent living


LabelValue

25.3 %3406Yes1

52.5 %7068No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC55: Other Services Outcome Follow-Up


Other Services:

Outcome follow-up (post-discharge)


LabelValue

26.2 %3521Yes1

51.7 %6953No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 42 -


SRVC56: Other Services Parenting/family


Other Services:

Parenting/family skills development


LabelValue

29.1 %3910Yes1

48.8 %6563No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2982MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC57: Other Services Self-help Grps


Other Services:

Self-help groups, including 12-step programs


LabelValue

40.9 %5504Yes1

36.9 %4971No2

Missing Data

22.1 %2980MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 43 -


SRVC58: Other Services Socialization


Other Services:

Socialization/recreational services


LabelValue

24.4 %3280Yes1

53.5 %7194No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC59: Other Services Transportation


Other Services:

Transportation assistance to treatment


LabelValue

28.4 %3820Yes1

49.5 %6654No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 44 -


SRVC60: Other Services Other


Other Services:

Other (service)


LabelValue

2.6 %346Yes1

75.3 %10128No2

Missing Data

22.2 %2981MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC30: Programs for Adolescents


Programs for special groups:

Adolescents


LabelValue

38.4 %5163Yes1

61.5 %8279No2

Missing Data

0.1 %13MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 45 -


SRVC31: Programs for Dual Diagnosis



Dually-diagnosed (mental and substance abuse disorders)


LabelValue

47.7 %6416Yes1

52.2 %7026No2

Missing Data

0.1 %13MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC32: Programs for HIV/AID



Persons with HIV/AIDS


LabelValue

19.1 %2576Yes1

80.8 %10865No2

Missing Data

0.1 %14MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 46 -


SRVC33: Programs for Pregnant or Postpartum



Pregnant/Postpartum women


LabelValue

18.5 %2493Yes1

81.4 %10947No2

Missing Data

0.1 %15MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




SRVC34: Other Services Womens Groups



Other women's groups


LabelValue

28.4 %3824Yes1

71.5 %9616No2

Missing Data

0.1 %15MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 47 -


SRVC35: Facility Provides Other Special Groups



Other (special group)


LabelValue

8.7 %1171Yes1

91.2 %12270No2

Missing Data

0.1 %14MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




TYPE1: Outpatient Detox

On October 1, 1998, which of the following types of substanceabuse treatment were offered at this facility?

Outpatient detoxification


LabelValue

11.5 %1549Yes1

88.5 %11905No2

Missing Data

0.0 %1MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 48 -


TYPE2: Intensive Outpatient Treatment


Intensive outpatient treatment


LabelValue

46.7 %6282Yes1

53.3 %7169No2

Missing Data

0.0 %4MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




TYPE3: Other Outpatient Treatment


All other outpatient treatment


LabelValue

73.6 %9907Yes1

26.3 %3543No2

Missing Data

0.0 %5MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 49 -

TYPE4: Hospital Inpatient Detox


Hospital inpatient detoxification


LabelValue

8.5 %1148Yes1

91.5 %12305No2

Missing Data

0.0 %2MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




TYPE5: Hospital Inpatient Rehabilitation


Hospital inpatient rehabilitation


LabelValue

5.8 %784Yes1

94.2 %12668No2

Missing Data

0.0 %3MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




TYPE6: Non-hospital Residential Detox

- 50 -


Non-hospital residential (24 hour care) detoxification


LabelValue

7.5 %1003Yes1

92.5 %12450No2

Missing Data

0.0 %2MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




TYPE7: Non-hospital Residential Rehab


Non-hospital residential (24 hour care) rehabilitation


LabelValue

24.9 %3348Yes1

75.1 %10104No2

Missing Data

0.0 %3MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




ADMINLNK: Facility Part of Network-Yes/No

On October 1, 1998, was this facility part of a network of administratively-linked facilities that provide substance abuse treatment?

- 51 -


LabelValue

53.3 %7169Yes1

46.5 %6260No2

Missing Data

0.2 %26MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




FACNUM: # of Facilities in Client Count Data

How many facilities are included in the client data you will be reporting?


LabelValue

0.0 %1-0

2.5 %342-2

1.1 %142-3

0.7 %88-4

0.3 %40-5

0.3 %38-6

0.2 %24-7

0.2 %21-8

0.0 %6-9

0.1 %8-10

0.0 %3-11

0.0 %3-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %1-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %1-20

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-31

Missing Data

94.6 %12731MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


• Mean: 3.56

- 52 -

• Median: 3.00• Mode: 2.00• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 31• Standard Deviation: 2.58


OTHFAC1: Client Counts-Fac Combined w/Others

Facility has client counts combined with those of another facility


LabelValue

5.4 %720Yes1

47.8 %6434No2

Missing Data

46.8 %6301MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




OTHFAC2: Client Counts-This Facility Only

Client counts are for this facility only


LabelValue

38.0 %5117Yes1

15.1 %2037No2

Missing Data

46.8 %6301MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




OTHFAC3: Cannot Provide Any Client Counts

- 53 -

Facility cannot provide client counts


LabelValue

9.8 %1317Yes1

43.4 %5837No2

Missing Data

46.8 %6301MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




CLIENTS4: TOTAL OF T_CLI1-T_CLI7 AFTER EDITS

TOTAL Clients after edits (T_CLI1 thru T_CLI7)


LabelValue

2.1 %283-0

0.8 %112-1

1.2 %160-2

1.1 %152-3

1.2 %158-4

1.7 %226-5

1.5 %204-6

1.2 %161-7

1.6 %221-8

1.1 %143-9

2.2 %298-10

1.0 %141-11

1.8 %246-12

1.0 %139-13

1.2 %159-14

2.3 %312-15

1.4 %186-16

1.1 %146-17

1.1 %154-18

1.0 %134-19

2.4 %326-20

0.7 %98-21

1.0 %128-22

- 54 -


LabelValue

0.7 %96-23

0.9 %127-24

1.5 %204-25

0.7 %99-26

0.6 %79-27

1.0 %133-28

0.6 %77-29

1.8 %242-30

0.6 %78-31

0.7 %96-32

0.6 %77-33

0.5 %74-34

1.0 %136-35

0.5 %71-36

0.6 %79-37

0.7 %89-38

0.4 %50-39

1.5 %203-40

0.5 %63-41

0.7 %89-42

0.5 %67-43

0.4 %49-44

0.9 %118-45

0.5 %64-46

0.5 %67-47

0.5 %74-48

0.3 %45-49

Missing Data

10.6 %1432MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 86.37• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 3451• Standard Deviation: 160.09


- 55 -

HISVC: Hospital Inpatient Treatment Offered

Were hospital inpatient substance abuse treatment services offered on October 1, 1998?


LabelValue

9.2 %1238Yes1

81.0 %10898No2

Missing Data

9.8 %1319MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




HOSPBED: Total Beds Designated-Hospital Inpatient

On October 1, 1998, how many beds were designated for hospital inpatient substance abuse treatment clients? This is often referredto as "maximum capacity". ###


LabelValue

0.6 %80-0

0.1 %7-1

0.2 %23-2

0.1 %12-3

0.2 %33-4

0.2 %27-5

0.3 %46-6

0.1 %8-7

0.3 %41-8

0.1 %10-9

0.6 %77-10

0.1 %13-11

0.4 %54-12

0.1 %15-13

0.2 %32-14

0.3 %46-15

0.4 %54-16

0.1 %13-17

0.3 %43-18

0.1 %15-19

0.6 %84-20

- 56 -


LabelValue

0.0 %5-21

0.2 %29-22

0.1 %15-23

0.3 %43-24

0.1 %14-25

0.1 %13-26

0.1 %7-27

0.1 %20-28

0.0 %6-29

0.2 %30-30

0.0 %6-31

0.1 %18-32

0.0 %6-33

0.1 %9-34

0.0 %4-35

0.1 %13-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %6-38

0.0 %2-39

0.2 %26-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %4-42

0.0 %3-43

0.1 %7-44

0.0 %3-45

0.1 %7-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %4-48

0.1 %10-50

Missing Data

91.5 %12313MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 57 -


T_CLI1: Hosp. Inpatient Clients,Detox

On October 1, 1998, how many clients at this facility receivedthe following hospital inpatients substance abuse services? ###

a. Hospital inpatient detoxification


LabelValue

1.5 %201-0

0.9 %118-1

0.8 %113-2

0.8 %111-3

0.7 %100-4

0.6 %79-5

0.4 %52-6

0.3 %35-7

0.3 %37-8

0.2 %21-9

0.4 %52-10

0.1 %8-11

0.1 %17-12

0.0 %6-13

0.1 %7-14

0.1 %16-15

0.1 %8-16

0.1 %8-17

0.0 %4-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %8-20

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %5-25

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %2-33

- 58 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %2-60

0.0 %1-61

0.0 %1-64

0.0 %1-70

0.0 %1-100

0.0 %1-150

0.0 %1-366

Missing Data

92.2 %12409MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




T_CLI2: Hosp. Inpatient Clients,Rehab

On October 1, 1998, how many clients at this facility receivedthe following hospital inpatients substance abuse services? ###

b. Hospital inpatient rehabilitation


LabelValue

1.2 %166-0

0.3 %43-1

0.4 %57-2

0.3 %40-3

0.3 %36-4

- 59 -


LabelValue

0.2 %25-5

0.2 %27-6

0.3 %36-7

0.2 %24-8

0.1 %11-9

0.2 %21-10

0.1 %12-11

0.1 %18-12

0.1 %7-13

0.1 %12-14

0.2 %21-15

0.1 %10-16

0.1 %7-17

0.1 %7-18

0.1 %10-19

0.1 %18-20

0.0 %5-21

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %5-23

0.0 %5-24

0.1 %8-25

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %6-28

0.0 %2-29

0.1 %7-30

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %4-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %3-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %2-51

- 60 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-60

Missing Data

94.7 %12747MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients

d. TOTAL HOSPITAL INPATIENTS(a+b)


LabelValue

1.2 %155-0

0.6 %87-1

0.6 %81-2

0.6 %75-3

0.6 %81-4

0.6 %78-5

0.4 %51-6

0.3 %42-7

0.3 %43-8

0.2 %22-9

0.4 %54-10

0.1 %19-11

0.3 %39-12

0.2 %21-13

0.1 %17-14

0.3 %39-15

0.2 %25-16

0.1 %18-17

- 61 -


LabelValue

0.1 %19-18

0.1 %15-19

0.2 %22-20

0.0 %4-21

0.0 %6-22

0.0 %6-23

0.1 %12-24

0.1 %14-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %4-27

0.1 %8-28

0.1 %7-29

0.1 %14-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %4-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

91.3 %12287MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 12.52• Median: 6.00• Mode: 0.00

- 62 -

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 366• Standard Deviation: 23.86


HIMETLAM: Meth/LAAM Dispensed-Inpatients

On October 1, 1998, how many of the TOTAL INPATIENTS reported in Q20c were receiving methadone or LAAM at this location?


LabelValue

6.9 %934Does not dispense1

0.7 %89Does dispense2

Missing Data

92.4 %12432MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




HIMETNUM: Total Methadone Inpatients

Methadone clients at this location.


LabelValue

0.0 %1-0

0.2 %22-1

0.0 %6-2

0.1 %9-3

0.1 %8-4

0.0 %2-5

0.1 %8-6

0.0 %5-7

0.0 %6-8

0.0 %2-9

0.0 %4-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %3-16

- 63 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-120

Missing Data

99.3 %13366MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




HILAMNUM: Total LAAM Inpatients

LAAM clients at this location.


LabelValue

0.6 %87-0

0.0 %1-1

0.0 %1-2

Missing Data

99.3 %13366MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 64 -

H_SEX1: Hosp Inp Male Clients

How many of the total hospital inpatients in Q20c were in each ofthe following gender, race/ethnicity, and age categories? ###

GENDER

Hospital inpatients, male


LabelValue

82.9 %11153-0

0.8 %114-1

0.9 %117-2

0.8 %101-3

0.6 %77-4

0.5 %69-5

0.4 %58-6

0.3 %43-7

0.3 %45-8

0.3 %44-9

0.3 %42-10

0.2 %24-11

0.1 %18-12

0.1 %13-13

0.1 %17-14

0.2 %27-15

0.1 %20-16

0.1 %16-17

0.1 %16-18

0.1 %9-19

0.1 %9-20

0.0 %3-21

0.1 %7-22

0.0 %6-23

0.0 %6-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %5-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %2-29

0.1 %9-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-32

- 65 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %5-35

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %3-38

0.0 %3-39

0.0 %5-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %2-56

0.0 %2-57

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-60

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





H_SEX2: Hosp Inp Female Clients


GENDER

Hospital inpatients, female

- 66 -


LabelValue

84.9 %11426-0

1.2 %168-1

1.1 %152-2

0.6 %78-3

0.5 %71-4

0.4 %50-5

0.3 %39-6

0.3 %37-7

0.1 %15-8

0.1 %14-9

0.1 %16-10

0.0 %5-11

0.1 %12-12

0.1 %10-13

0.0 %4-14

0.0 %5-15

0.0 %3-16

0.0 %3-18

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-61

0.0 %1-83

0.0 %1-97

0.0 %1-115

0.0 %1-116

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

- 67 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total




H_SEX3: Hosp Inp Unknown Clients gender


GENDER

Hospital inpatients, gender unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




H_SEX4: Hosp Inp Clients Gender total


GENDER

- 68 -

TOTAL HOSPITAL INPATIENTS


LabelValue

82.7 %11124-0

0.6 %87-1

0.6 %81-2

0.6 %75-3

0.6 %81-4

0.6 %78-5

0.4 %51-6

0.3 %42-7

0.3 %43-8

0.2 %22-9

0.4 %54-10

0.1 %19-11

0.3 %39-12

0.2 %21-13

0.1 %17-14

0.3 %39-15

0.2 %25-16

0.1 %18-17

0.1 %19-18

0.1 %15-19

0.2 %22-20

0.0 %4-21

0.0 %6-22

0.0 %6-23

0.1 %12-24

0.1 %14-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %4-27

0.1 %8-28

0.1 %7-29

0.1 %14-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %1-39

- 69 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





H_RE1: Hosp Inp Clients/White


RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, white


LabelValue

83.0 %11161-0

0.9 %120-1

1.0 %135-2

0.8 %107-3

0.7 %88-4

0.5 %62-5

- 70 -


LabelValue

0.4 %58-6

0.3 %42-7

0.4 %56-8

0.3 %34-9

0.3 %41-10

0.1 %17-11

0.2 %29-12

0.2 %25-13

0.1 %13-14

0.1 %20-15

0.1 %12-16

0.1 %11-17

0.1 %7-18

0.1 %9-19

0.1 %15-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %4-27

0.0 %1-28

0.1 %7-29

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %5-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %3-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-61

- 71 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-75

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





H_RE2: Hosp Inp Clients/Black


RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, black or African American (not of Hispanicorigin)


LabelValue

85.8 %11538-0

1.2 %162-1

0.7 %99-2

0.6 %81-3

0.3 %45-4

0.3 %42-5

0.2 %27-6

0.1 %13-7

0.1 %18-8

0.1 %12-9

0.1 %16-10

0.1 %11-11

0.1 %7-12

- 72 -


LabelValue

0.0 %6-13

0.0 %4-14

0.0 %4-15

0.0 %6-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %2-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %3-25

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-66

0.0 %1-67

0.0 %1-70

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-129

0.0 %1-159

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


• Mean: 0.32• Median: 0.00• Mode: 0.00• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 159

- 73 -

• Standard Deviation: 3.01


H_RE3: Hosp Inp Clients/Hispanic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, Hispanic


LabelValue

87.8 %11813-0

1.0 %138-1

0.5 %61-2

0.2 %32-3

0.1 %18-4

0.1 %16-5

0.1 %10-6

0.1 %7-7

0.1 %8-8

0.0 %1-9

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %6-11

0.0 %4-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %1-18

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-40

Missing Data

- 74 -


LabelValue

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




H_RE4: Hosp Inp Clients Asian or Pacific


RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, Asian or Pacific Islander


LabelValue

90.0 %12106-0

0.1 %18-1

0.1 %9-2

0.0 %2-3

0.0 %2-4

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 75 -

H_RE5: Hosp Inp Clients American Indian/A.N.


RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, American Indian or Alaskan Native


LabelValue

89.4 %12033-0

0.5 %63-1

0.1 %14-2

0.1 %8-3

0.0 %3-4

0.0 %1-5

0.0 %1-6

0.0 %1-7

0.0 %1-8

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %4-12

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-34

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




H_RE6: Hosp Inp Clients Of other race/ethnic


- 76 -

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

90.0 %12104-0

0.2 %25-1

0.0 %3-2

0.0 %2-3

0.0 %1-6

0.0 %1-7

0.0 %1-8

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




H_RE7: Hosp Inp Unknown Clients race/ethnic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Hospital inpatients, race/ethnicity not known


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total


• Mean: 0.00• Median: 0.00

- 77 -

• Mode: 0.00• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 0• Standard Deviation: 0.00


H_RE8: Hosp Inp Clients Race/ethnic total


RACE/ETHNICITY



LabelValue

82.7 %11124-0

0.6 %87-1

0.6 %81-2

0.6 %75-3

0.6 %81-4

0.6 %78-5

0.4 %51-6

0.3 %42-7

0.3 %43-8

0.2 %22-9

0.4 %54-10

0.1 %19-11

0.3 %39-12

0.2 %21-13

0.1 %17-14

0.3 %39-15

0.2 %25-16

0.1 %18-17

0.1 %19-18

0.1 %15-19

0.2 %22-20

0.0 %4-21

0.0 %6-22

0.0 %6-23

0.1 %12-24

0.1 %14-25

0.0 %2-26

- 78 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-27

0.1 %8-28

0.1 %7-29

0.1 %14-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %4-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





H_AGE1: Hosp Inp Clients Under 18 years old

How many of the total hospital inpatients in Q20c were in each of

- 79 -

the following gender, race/ethnicity, and age categories? ###

AGE

Hospital inpatients, under 18 years


LabelValue

88.5 %11910-0

0.7 %91-1

0.3 %35-2

0.1 %13-3

0.1 %12-4

0.0 %3-5

0.1 %9-6

0.0 %5-7

0.0 %1-8

0.0 %3-9

0.1 %9-10

0.0 %2-11

0.0 %3-12

0.0 %3-13

0.0 %2-14

0.0 %5-15

0.0 %4-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %1-18

0.0 %2-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-80

0.0 %1-83

0.0 %1-174

0.0 %1-285

Missing Data

- 80 -


LabelValue

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




H_AGE2: Hosp Inp Clients Between age 18 - 20


AGE

Hospital inpatients, age 18-20


LabelValue

88.3 %11876-0

1.1 %143-1

0.4 %54-2

0.2 %23-3

0.1 %10-4

0.1 %10-5

0.0 %6-6

0.0 %3-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %1-9

0.0 %5-10

0.0 %1-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-35

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 81 -



H_AGE3: Hosp Inp Clients Between age 21 - 24


AGE



LabelValue

86.9 %11691-0

1.5 %205-1

0.7 %99-2

0.4 %50-3

0.2 %25-4

0.1 %19-5

0.1 %10-6

0.0 %4-7

0.0 %2-8

0.1 %7-9

0.1 %11-10

0.0 %2-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %2-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %2-20

0.0 %1-30

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 82 -



H_AGE4: Hosp Inp Clients Age 25-34 years


AGE



LabelValue

84.7 %11395-0

1.7 %232-1

1.0 %137-2

0.7 %93-3

0.4 %51-4

0.4 %59-5

0.3 %35-6

0.1 %17-7

0.1 %17-8

0.1 %10-9

0.1 %14-10

0.0 %6-11

0.1 %8-12

0.0 %5-13

0.1 %8-14

0.1 %7-15

0.0 %4-16

0.0 %4-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %5-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %5-21

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %1-25

- 83 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-69

0.0 %1-95

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total






AGE



LabelValue

84.4 %11354-0

1.4 %183-1

1.2 %158-2

0.8 %101-3

0.5 %63-4

0.4 %60-5

- 84 -


LabelValue

0.4 %50-6

0.2 %31-7

0.2 %24-8

0.1 %15-9

0.1 %19-10

0.1 %9-11

0.1 %8-12

0.0 %4-13

0.0 %5-14

0.0 %6-15

0.0 %6-16

0.0 %4-17

0.0 %3-18

0.0 %2-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-71

0.0 %1-75

0.0 %1-100

0.0 %1-145

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 85 -





AGE



LabelValue

85.4 %11495-0

1.9 %259-1

0.9 %125-2

0.6 %84-3

0.4 %54-4

0.1 %19-5

0.1 %18-6

0.1 %12-7

0.1 %9-8

0.1 %12-9

0.1 %9-10

0.1 %8-11

0.1 %8-12

0.0 %4-13

0.0 %3-14

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %2-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

- 86 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-100

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




H_AGE7: Hosp Inp Clients Age 65 and over


AGE

Hospital inpatients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

88.7 %11938-0

0.9 %126-1

0.3 %42-2

0.1 %13-3

0.0 %6-4

0.0 %4-5

0.0 %4-7

0.0 %1-8

0.0 %1-10

0.0 %1-20

0.0 %1-66

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total

- 87 -




H_AGE8: Hosp Inp Clients Age unknown


AGE

Hospital inpatients, age unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




H_AGE9: Hosp Inp Clients Age total


AGE


- 88 -


LabelValue

82.7 %11124-0

0.6 %87-1

0.6 %81-2

0.6 %75-3

0.6 %81-4

0.6 %78-5

0.4 %51-6

0.3 %42-7

0.3 %43-8

0.2 %22-9

0.4 %54-10

0.1 %19-11

0.3 %39-12

0.2 %21-13

0.1 %17-14

0.3 %39-15

0.2 %25-16

0.1 %18-17

0.1 %19-18

0.1 %15-19

0.2 %22-20

0.0 %4-21

0.0 %6-22

0.0 %6-23

0.1 %12-24

0.1 %14-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %4-27

0.1 %8-28

0.1 %7-29

0.1 %14-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %4-40

0.0 %1-41

- 89 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





RCSVC: Residential (24hr) Treatment Offered

Were non-hospital residential substance abuse treatment services offered on October 1, 1998?


LabelValue

24.3 %3263Yes1

66.0 %8874No2

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




RESBED: Total Beds - Residential (24hr) Clients

- 90 -

On October 1, 1998, how many beds were designated for non-hospital residential substance abuse treatment clients? This is oftenreferred to as "maximum capacity". ###


LabelValue

0.3 %41-0

0.0 %1-1

0.1 %10-2

0.1 %7-3

0.1 %18-4

0.3 %35-5

0.7 %95-6

0.2 %25-7

0.7 %98-8

0.2 %33-9

0.9 %124-10

0.2 %21-11

1.4 %194-12

0.4 %49-13

0.8 %103-14

0.9 %126-15

1.1 %147-16

0.3 %40-17

0.7 %89-18

0.2 %32-19

1.3 %181-20

0.3 %43-21

0.5 %67-22

0.2 %28-23

0.9 %127-24

0.5 %68-25

0.4 %48-26

0.1 %17-27

0.3 %39-28

0.1 %14-29

0.8 %102-30

0.1 %14-31

0.3 %47-32

0.1 %16-33

0.2 %21-34

0.3 %39-35

0.4 %48-36

0.1 %18-37

0.2 %24-38

0.1 %11-39

- 91 -


LabelValue

0.7 %89-40

0.1 %13-41

0.2 %32-42

0.1 %9-43

0.1 %17-44

0.2 %28-45

0.1 %18-46

0.0 %6-47

0.3 %37-48

0.1 %9-49

Missing Data

76.2 %10248MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





T_CLI3: Residential (24hr) Clients,detox

On October 1, 1998, how many clients at this facility receivedthe following non-hospital residential (24-hour care) substanceabuse treatment services? ###

a. Residential clients, detoxification


LabelValue

1.9 %256-0

0.3 %43-1

0.7 %91-2

0.5 %68-3

0.4 %55-4

0.3 %38-5

0.4 %60-6

- 92 -


LabelValue

0.2 %23-7

0.2 %31-8

0.1 %12-9

0.2 %32-10

0.1 %19-11

0.2 %23-12

0.1 %9-13

0.1 %11-14

0.1 %17-15

0.1 %17-16

0.1 %8-17

0.0 %5-18

0.1 %8-19

0.1 %9-20

0.0 %3-21

0.1 %7-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %4-24

0.0 %6-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %6-28

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %2-38

0.0 %3-39

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %2-50

- 93 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-52

Missing Data

93.2 %12536MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





T_CLI4: Residential (24hr) Clients,rehab

On October 1, 1998, how many clients at this facility receivedthe following non-hospital residential (24-hour care) substanceabuse treatment services? ###

b. Residential clients, rehabilitation


LabelValue

0.9 %115-0

0.2 %21-1

0.2 %29-2

0.3 %39-3

0.4 %58-4

0.5 %65-5

0.7 %98-6

0.5 %66-7

0.9 %116-8

0.6 %83-9

0.8 %113-10

0.6 %79-11

1.0 %137-12

0.6 %78-13

0.7 %91-14

0.9 %122-15

- 94 -


LabelValue

0.8 %105-16

0.6 %87-17

0.7 %88-18

0.4 %55-19

0.8 %110-20

0.4 %57-21

0.5 %64-22

0.2 %31-23

0.5 %68-24

0.4 %54-25

0.2 %32-26

0.2 %22-27

0.4 %49-28

0.2 %30-29

0.4 %54-30

0.2 %24-31

0.2 %33-32

0.2 %21-33

0.1 %19-34

0.3 %43-35

0.2 %22-36

0.1 %17-37

0.1 %19-38

0.1 %10-39

0.3 %46-40

0.1 %10-41

0.1 %16-42

0.1 %16-43

0.2 %21-44

0.1 %15-45

0.1 %14-46

0.1 %10-47

0.2 %22-48

0.0 %4-49

Missing Data

77.2 %10393MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 32.76

- 95 -



T_CLIRC: Total (24hr) Residential Clients


LabelValue

0.7 %90-0

0.1 %20-1

0.2 %33-2

0.3 %44-3

0.5 %63-4

0.5 %70-5

0.8 %114-6

0.5 %64-7

0.9 %119-8

0.6 %83-9

0.9 %121-10

0.6 %76-11

1.1 %144-12

0.5 %70-13

0.8 %101-14

0.9 %115-15

0.8 %109-16

0.6 %83-17

0.7 %89-18

0.5 %65-19

0.9 %119-20

0.4 %56-21

0.5 %71-22

0.3 %35-23

0.6 %76-24

0.5 %64-25

0.3 %34-26

0.2 %21-27

0.4 %51-28

0.2 %27-29

0.4 %60-30

0.2 %25-31

- 96 -


LabelValue

0.3 %36-32

0.1 %20-33

0.2 %21-34

0.3 %43-35

0.2 %23-36

0.2 %21-37

0.2 %27-38

0.1 %13-39

0.3 %45-40

0.1 %13-41

0.2 %24-42

0.1 %16-43

0.1 %20-44

0.1 %16-45

0.1 %20-46

0.1 %11-47

0.2 %28-48

0.0 %6-49

Missing Data

76.0 %10231MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





RCMETLAM: Meth/LAAM Dispensed-Residential

On October 1, 1998, how many of the TOTAL INPATIENTS reported in Q20c were receiving methadone or LAAM at this location?


LabelValue



Missing Data

- 97 -


LabelValue

76.7 %10322MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




RCMETNUM: Total Methadone Residential



LabelValue

0.1 %13-1

0.0 %6-2

0.0 %5-3

0.0 %3-4

0.0 %1-5

0.0 %3-6

0.0 %2-7

0.0 %2-8

0.1 %7-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %1-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-61

Missing Data

99.6 %13398MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


• Mean: 10.26• Median: 6.00

- 98 -

• Mode: 1.00• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 61• Standard Deviation: 12.90


RCLAMNUM: Total LAAM Residential



LabelValue

0.4 %57-0

0.0 %1-1

Missing Data

99.6 %13397MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




R_SEX1: Residential Male Clients

How many of the total Residential clients in Q20c were in each ofthe following gender, race/ethnicity, and age categories? ###

GENDER

Residential clients, male


LabelValue

71.0 %9548-0

0.2 %31-1

0.4 %50-2

0.5 %66-3

0.6 %77-4

0.5 %65-5

- 99 -


LabelValue

0.8 %104-6

0.6 %79-7

0.8 %114-8

0.6 %80-9

0.8 %110-10

0.5 %71-11

0.8 %114-12

0.4 %57-13

0.6 %75-14

0.8 %103-15

0.5 %74-16

0.4 %53-17

0.6 %77-18

0.3 %44-19

0.5 %73-20

0.4 %51-21

0.4 %53-22

0.2 %30-23

0.4 %55-24

0.4 %52-25

0.2 %30-26

0.1 %18-27

0.2 %31-28

0.2 %30-29

0.4 %52-30

0.1 %16-31

0.2 %27-32

0.1 %10-33

0.1 %16-34

0.2 %31-35

0.1 %17-36

0.1 %19-37

0.1 %20-38

0.1 %7-39

0.2 %31-40

0.1 %12-41

0.1 %14-42

0.1 %16-43

0.1 %13-44

0.1 %15-45

0.1 %17-46

0.1 %14-47

- 100 -


LabelValue

0.1 %19-48

0.0 %6-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





R_SEX2: Residential Female Clients


GENDER

Residential clients, female


LabelValue

74.4 %10016-0

1.2 %157-1

1.1 %145-2

1.0 %130-3

1.2 %158-4

1.1 %152-5

1.2 %167-6

0.7 %93-7

1.0 %138-8

0.6 %77-9

0.8 %103-10

0.4 %54-11

0.6 %87-12

0.4 %48-13

- 101 -


LabelValue

0.4 %56-14

0.4 %52-15

0.4 %54-16

0.3 %34-17

0.3 %42-18

0.2 %25-19

0.3 %45-20

0.1 %16-21

0.2 %27-22

0.1 %13-23

0.1 %17-24

0.2 %21-25

0.1 %14-26

0.1 %7-27

0.2 %22-28

0.0 %4-29

0.1 %17-30

0.0 %6-31

0.1 %7-32

0.0 %5-33

0.0 %6-34

0.0 %6-35

0.1 %8-36

0.0 %6-37

0.0 %3-38

0.0 %2-39

0.1 %10-40

0.1 %7-41

0.0 %6-42

0.0 %3-43

0.0 %6-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %4-46

0.0 %4-47

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %6-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 102 -




R_SEX3: Residential Unknown Clients Gender


GENDER

Residential clients, gender unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




R_SEX4: Residential Clients Gender Total


GENDER

TOTAL Residential clients

- 103 -


LabelValue

66.9 %9003-0

0.1 %20-1

0.2 %33-2

0.3 %44-3

0.5 %63-4

0.5 %70-5

0.8 %114-6

0.5 %64-7

0.9 %119-8

0.6 %83-9

0.9 %121-10

0.6 %76-11

1.1 %144-12

0.5 %70-13

0.8 %101-14

0.9 %115-15

0.8 %109-16

0.6 %83-17

0.7 %89-18

0.5 %65-19

0.9 %119-20

0.4 %56-21

0.5 %71-22

0.3 %35-23

0.6 %76-24

0.5 %64-25

0.3 %34-26

0.2 %21-27

0.4 %51-28

0.2 %27-29

0.4 %60-30

0.2 %25-31

0.3 %36-32

0.1 %20-33

0.2 %21-34

0.3 %43-35

0.2 %23-36

0.2 %21-37

0.2 %27-38

0.1 %13-39

0.3 %45-40

0.1 %13-41

- 104 -


LabelValue

0.2 %24-42

0.1 %16-43

0.1 %20-44

0.1 %16-45

0.1 %20-46

0.1 %11-47

0.2 %28-48

0.0 %6-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





R_RE1: Residential Clients/White


RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, white


LabelValue

68.4 %9204-0

0.8 %112-1

1.2 %162-2

1.1 %154-3

1.1 %146-4

1.1 %153-5

1.1 %146-6

0.9 %118-7

- 105 -


LabelValue

1.2 %159-8

0.9 %120-9

1.1 %152-10

0.8 %113-11

0.9 %122-12

0.6 %76-13

0.7 %89-14

0.7 %90-15

0.5 %72-16

0.4 %60-17

0.4 %60-18

0.4 %53-19

0.5 %71-20

0.3 %45-21

0.3 %46-22

0.2 %30-23

0.2 %32-24

0.3 %42-25

0.2 %32-26

0.2 %24-27

0.2 %33-28

0.2 %23-29

0.3 %37-30

0.1 %17-31

0.1 %19-32

0.1 %13-33

0.1 %16-34

0.2 %27-35

0.1 %11-36

0.1 %17-37

0.1 %11-38

0.1 %11-39

0.1 %15-40

0.0 %6-41

0.1 %7-42

0.1 %7-43

0.1 %8-44

0.0 %5-45

0.0 %4-46

0.0 %2-47

0.1 %9-48

0.0 %4-49

- 106 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





R_RE2: Residential Clients/Black


RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, black or African American (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

71.7 %9642-0

2.3 %309-1

2.1 %285-2

1.6 %221-3

1.4 %184-4

1.3 %176-5

0.9 %125-6

0.7 %99-7

0.8 %109-8

0.5 %72-9

0.7 %99-10

0.3 %45-11

0.4 %51-12

0.3 %41-13

0.4 %48-14

- 107 -


LabelValue

0.4 %50-15

0.2 %33-16

0.2 %32-17

0.2 %30-18

0.2 %22-19

0.3 %36-20

0.1 %20-21

0.2 %25-22

0.2 %23-23

0.1 %17-24

0.1 %19-25

0.1 %13-26

0.1 %13-27

0.1 %10-28

0.1 %12-29

0.1 %16-30

0.1 %10-31

0.0 %6-32

0.1 %11-33

0.0 %4-34

0.1 %13-35

0.1 %7-36

0.1 %10-37

0.0 %6-38

0.1 %7-39

0.1 %11-40

0.0 %3-41

0.1 %10-42

0.0 %3-43

0.0 %4-44

0.1 %7-45

0.0 %5-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %4-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 108 -



R_RE3: Residential Clients/Hispanic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, Hispanic


LabelValue

77.8 %10471-0

3.8 %512-1

2.1 %277-2

1.2 %157-3

0.8 %108-4

0.7 %92-5

0.6 %84-6

0.2 %25-7

0.2 %32-8

0.3 %34-9

0.4 %56-10

0.1 %19-11

0.2 %22-12

0.1 %18-13

0.1 %18-14

0.2 %26-15

0.1 %10-16

0.1 %11-17

0.1 %7-18

0.1 %9-19

0.1 %12-20

0.1 %7-21

0.0 %5-22

0.1 %8-23

0.0 %6-24

- 109 -


LabelValue

0.1 %10-25

0.0 %5-26

0.1 %7-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %4-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %3-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %3-36

0.0 %3-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %2-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





R_RE4: Residential Clients Asian or Pacific

- 110 -


RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, Asian or Pacific Islander


LabelValue

88.2 %11863-0

1.4 %187-1

0.3 %44-2

0.1 %16-3

0.0 %4-4

0.0 %3-5

0.0 %4-6

0.0 %3-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %1-9

0.0 %1-10

0.0 %1-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %2-20

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %1-66

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




R_RE5: Residential Clients American Indian/A.N.


- 111 -

RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, American Indian or Alaskan Native


LabelValue

85.4 %11494-0

2.2 %302-1

0.8 %109-2

0.4 %48-3

0.3 %36-4

0.2 %24-5

0.1 %15-6

0.1 %14-7

0.1 %10-8

0.1 %7-9

0.1 %10-10

0.0 %5-11

0.1 %11-12

0.1 %7-13

0.1 %8-14

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %5-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %5-18

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-200

0.0 %1-275

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 112 -



R_RE6: Residential Clients Of other race/ethnic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

88.3 %11884-0

1.0 %139-1

0.4 %50-2

0.2 %22-3

0.1 %12-4

0.1 %7-5

0.0 %2-6

0.0 %3-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %3-9

0.0 %3-10

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %1-13

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-72

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


• Mean: 0.06

- 113 -



R_RE7: Residential Unknown Clients race/ethnic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Residential clients, race/ethnicity not known


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




R_RE8: Residential Clients Race/ethnic total


RACE/ETHNICITY



LabelValue

66.9 %9003-0

0.1 %20-1

- 114 -


LabelValue

0.2 %33-2

0.3 %44-3

0.5 %63-4

0.5 %70-5

0.8 %114-6

0.5 %64-7

0.9 %119-8

0.6 %83-9

0.9 %121-10

0.6 %76-11

1.1 %144-12

0.5 %70-13

0.8 %101-14

0.9 %115-15

0.8 %109-16

0.6 %83-17

0.7 %89-18

0.5 %65-19

0.9 %119-20

0.4 %56-21

0.5 %71-22

0.3 %35-23

0.6 %76-24

0.5 %64-25

0.3 %34-26

0.2 %21-27

0.4 %51-28

0.2 %27-29

0.4 %60-30

0.2 %25-31

0.3 %36-32

0.1 %20-33

0.2 %21-34

0.3 %43-35

0.2 %23-36

0.2 %21-37

0.2 %27-38

0.1 %13-39

0.3 %45-40

0.1 %13-41

0.2 %24-42

0.1 %16-43

- 115 -


LabelValue

0.1 %20-44

0.1 %16-45

0.1 %20-46

0.1 %11-47

0.2 %28-48

0.0 %6-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





R_AGE1: Residential Clients Under 18 years old


AGE

Residential clients, under 18 years


LabelValue

83.9 %11289-0

1.1 %151-1

0.8 %101-2

0.3 %44-3

0.3 %42-4

0.3 %34-5

0.2 %23-6

0.2 %25-7

0.2 %30-8

0.2 %29-9

- 116 -


LabelValue

0.2 %24-10

0.2 %21-11

0.2 %27-12

0.2 %24-13

0.2 %26-14

0.2 %26-15

0.2 %26-16

0.1 %11-17

0.1 %18-18

0.1 %11-19

0.1 %14-20

0.1 %8-21

0.1 %11-22

0.0 %6-23

0.1 %8-24

0.1 %7-25

0.0 %4-26

0.0 %6-27

0.1 %8-28

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %5-30

0.0 %5-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %5-34

0.0 %6-35

0.0 %3-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %2-38

0.0 %2-39

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %5-50

0.0 %1-52

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

- 117 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total





R_AGE2: Residential Clients Between Age 18 - 20


AGE

Residential clients, age 18-20


LabelValue

78.0 %10495-0

4.6 %624-1

2.8 %382-2

1.2 %162-3

0.9 %121-4

0.6 %84-5

0.4 %55-6

0.2 %28-7

0.1 %20-8

0.1 %13-9

0.2 %31-10

0.1 %7-11

0.1 %10-12

0.0 %5-13

0.1 %8-14

0.1 %9-15

0.1 %9-16

0.1 %7-17

- 118 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %10-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %3-22

0.1 %8-23

0.0 %6-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %2-56

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-64

0.0 %1-80

0.0 %1-83

0.0 %1-100

0.0 %1-101

0.0 %1-108

0.0 %1-129

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 119 -


R_AGE3: Residential Clients Between Age 21 - 24


AGE



LabelValue

74.4 %10014-0

3.6 %481-1

3.1 %421-2

2.3 %305-3

1.5 %199-4

1.1 %149-5

0.8 %108-6

0.5 %63-7

0.4 %53-8

0.2 %31-9

0.6 %79-10

0.2 %31-11

0.2 %21-12

0.1 %7-13

0.1 %13-14

0.1 %13-15

0.1 %12-16

0.1 %7-17

0.1 %9-18

0.1 %7-19

0.1 %19-20

0.0 %5-21

0.1 %7-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %1-24

0.1 %9-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %5-30

- 120 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %3-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %2-39

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %4-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %4-47

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %2-51

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





R_AGE4: Residential Clients Age 25-34 Years


AGE

- 121 -



LabelValue

70.8 %9520-0

1.3 %181-1

1.6 %222-2

1.5 %197-3

1.6 %221-4

1.5 %200-5

1.3 %178-6

1.1 %146-7

1.0 %139-8

0.9 %115-9

1.1 %147-10

0.5 %67-11

0.7 %96-12

0.3 %40-13

0.3 %43-14

0.4 %53-15

0.3 %41-16

0.3 %39-17

0.2 %32-18

0.2 %25-19

0.4 %53-20

0.1 %20-21

0.1 %20-22

0.2 %22-23

0.1 %13-24

0.2 %29-25

0.1 %19-26

0.1 %9-27

0.1 %11-28

0.0 %6-29

0.2 %31-30

0.0 %6-31

0.0 %5-32

0.1 %13-33

0.0 %4-34

0.1 %11-35

0.1 %7-36

0.1 %9-37

0.1 %9-38

0.0 %1-39

- 122 -


LabelValue

0.1 %12-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %4-42

0.0 %4-43

0.0 %3-44

0.1 %10-45

0.0 %6-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %3-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total







AGE



LabelValue

71.4 %9601-0

1.4 %192-1

2.1 %277-2

1.8 %248-3

1.5 %199-4

1.5 %199-5

- 123 -


LabelValue

1.3 %171-6

1.0 %139-7

1.1 %147-8

0.7 %93-9

0.9 %118-10

0.5 %68-11

0.5 %69-12

0.3 %37-13

0.3 %43-14

0.4 %59-15

0.3 %42-16

0.2 %28-17

0.2 %23-18

0.2 %29-19

0.3 %38-20

0.2 %29-21

0.1 %16-22

0.1 %10-23

0.1 %10-24

0.2 %21-25

0.1 %8-26

0.1 %10-27

0.1 %12-28

0.1 %7-29

0.1 %19-30

0.1 %9-31

0.0 %6-32

0.1 %7-33

0.1 %11-34

0.1 %9-35

0.0 %5-36

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %6-38

0.0 %2-39

0.1 %9-40

0.0 %3-41

0.0 %5-42

0.1 %9-43

0.0 %2-44

0.1 %7-45

0.0 %3-46

0.0 %4-47

- 124 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total







AGE



LabelValue

75.9 %10216-0

3.5 %465-1

2.8 %378-2

1.8 %242-3

1.2 %155-4

1.1 %145-5

0.8 %101-6

0.4 %59-7

0.4 %58-8

0.3 %41-9

0.5 %63-10

0.2 %27-11

0.1 %16-12

0.1 %19-13

- 125 -


LabelValue

0.1 %16-14

0.1 %18-15

0.0 %6-16

0.1 %12-17

0.1 %8-18

0.0 %6-19

0.1 %14-20

0.0 %3-21

0.1 %7-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %6-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %5-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %4-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %2-49

0.0 %2-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %3-56

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-77

0.0 %1-80

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 126 -




R_AGE7: Residential Clients Age 65 and Over


AGE

Residential clients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

88.2 %11867-0

1.3 %174-1

0.4 %48-2

0.1 %17-3

0.0 %5-4

0.1 %10-5

0.0 %2-6

0.0 %3-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %2-9

0.0 %3-10

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %2-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 127 -


R_AGE8: Residential Clients Age Unknown


AGE

Residential clients, age unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




R_AGE9: Residential Clients Age Total


AGE



LabelValue

66.9 %9003-0

0.1 %20-1

0.2 %33-2

0.3 %44-3

0.5 %63-4

0.5 %70-5

0.8 %114-6

- 128 -


LabelValue

0.5 %64-7

0.9 %119-8

0.6 %83-9

0.9 %121-10

0.6 %76-11

1.1 %144-12

0.5 %70-13

0.8 %101-14

0.9 %115-15

0.8 %109-16

0.6 %83-17

0.7 %89-18

0.5 %65-19

0.9 %119-20

0.4 %56-21

0.5 %71-22

0.3 %35-23

0.6 %76-24

0.5 %64-25

0.3 %34-26

0.2 %21-27

0.4 %51-28

0.2 %27-29

0.4 %60-30

0.2 %25-31

0.3 %36-32

0.1 %20-33

0.2 %21-34

0.3 %43-35

0.2 %23-36

0.2 %21-37

0.2 %27-38

0.1 %13-39

0.3 %45-40

0.1 %13-41

0.2 %24-42

0.1 %16-43

0.1 %20-44

0.1 %16-45

0.1 %20-46

0.1 %11-47

0.2 %28-48

- 129 -


LabelValue

0.0 %6-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1318MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





OUTSVC: Outpatient Treatment Offered-Yes/No

Were outpatient substance abuse treatment services offered on October 1, 1998?


LabelValue

73.0 %9822Yes1

17.2 %2317No2

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




T_CLI7: Clients in Outpatient Detox

In the 30 days between September 1 and October 1, 1998, how manyclients at this facility received the following outpatientsubstance abuse treatment services? ###

a. Outpatient detoxification

- 130 -


LabelValue

5.2 %695-0

0.6 %86-1

0.8 %111-2

0.5 %70-3

0.3 %47-4

0.4 %59-5

0.2 %33-6

0.2 %23-7

0.2 %27-8

0.1 %14-9

0.5 %74-10

0.1 %10-11

0.1 %16-12

0.0 %2-13

0.1 %12-14

0.2 %25-15

0.1 %15-16

0.0 %4-17

0.0 %6-18

0.1 %9-19

0.2 %21-20

0.0 %5-21

0.1 %9-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %1-24

0.1 %18-25

0.0 %1-26

0.1 %7-27

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %1-29

0.2 %25-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %5-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.1 %8-36

0.0 %6-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %3-39

0.1 %10-40

0.0 %2-41

- 131 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %3-44

0.0 %6-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-49

Missing Data

87.9 %11826MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





T_CLI6: Clients in Intensive outpatients


b. Intensive outpatient care


LabelValue

7.9 %1061-0

0.8 %111-1

1.0 %135-2

0.9 %123-3

1.0 %129-4

1.3 %169-5

1.1 %145-6

0.8 %110-7

1.1 %154-8

- 132 -


LabelValue

0.7 %100-9

1.8 %248-10

0.6 %87-11

1.3 %171-12

0.5 %66-13

0.6 %79-14

1.4 %186-15

0.5 %71-16

0.4 %59-17

0.7 %99-18

0.3 %47-19

1.5 %206-20

0.4 %51-21

0.5 %66-22

0.3 %43-23

0.5 %64-24

0.9 %123-25

0.4 %48-26

0.3 %40-27

0.3 %36-28

0.2 %26-29

1.0 %141-30

0.2 %27-31

0.3 %34-32

0.2 %31-33

0.3 %36-34

0.4 %56-35

0.2 %28-36

0.2 %22-37

0.2 %23-38

0.1 %19-39

0.6 %77-40

0.1 %12-41

0.2 %28-42

0.2 %24-43

0.1 %10-44

0.3 %35-45

0.1 %8-46

0.1 %13-47

0.1 %19-48

0.1 %17-49

Missing Data

- 133 -


LabelValue

57.6 %7744MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





T_CLI5: Clients in Other Outpatient Care


c. Other outpatient care


LabelValue

6.5 %872-0

0.8 %106-1

1.4 %190-2

1.2 %157-3

1.1 %154-4

1.6 %214-5

1.0 %140-6

0.9 %116-7

1.0 %138-8

0.6 %77-9

2.0 %272-10

0.5 %69-11

1.1 %153-12

0.6 %78-13

0.6 %79-14

1.6 %222-15

0.5 %68-16

0.5 %69-17

0.6 %78-18

- 134 -


LabelValue

0.5 %68-19

2.1 %283-20

0.4 %50-21

0.5 %69-22

0.4 %60-23

0.4 %54-24

1.4 %185-25

0.4 %54-26

0.3 %46-27

0.5 %69-28

0.3 %42-29

1.5 %200-30

0.3 %37-31

0.4 %59-32

0.4 %51-33

0.3 %40-34

0.8 %108-35

0.3 %37-36

0.3 %36-37

0.4 %50-38

0.2 %23-39

1.3 %181-40

0.2 %30-41

0.3 %46-42

0.3 %38-43

0.2 %24-44

0.7 %90-45

0.2 %27-46

0.3 %37-47

0.3 %39-48

0.2 %23-49

Missing Data

34.6 %4656MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 135 -


T_CLIOP: Total Number of Outpatient Clients


d. TOTAL OUTPATIENTS (a+b+c)


LabelValue

2.3 %306-0

0.7 %90-1

1.1 %145-2

1.1 %143-3

1.0 %136-4

1.4 %185-5

1.0 %129-6

1.0 %132-7

1.1 %149-8

0.7 %92-9

1.8 %237-10

0.6 %81-11

1.2 %161-12

0.7 %90-13

0.7 %89-14

1.8 %242-15

0.7 %95-16

0.6 %83-17

0.8 %107-18

0.6 %84-19

2.1 %284-20

0.4 %57-21

0.6 %83-22

0.5 %71-23

0.6 %80-24

1.3 %179-25

0.5 %72-26

0.4 %56-27

0.6 %84-28

0.4 %52-29

1.6 %219-30

- 136 -


LabelValue

0.4 %48-31

0.6 %78-32

0.4 %53-33

0.4 %56-34

0.8 %113-35

0.4 %52-36

0.4 %55-37

0.5 %66-38

0.3 %44-39

1.2 %165-40

0.3 %43-41

0.4 %60-42

0.4 %54-43

0.3 %41-44

0.8 %109-45

0.3 %43-46

0.4 %51-47

0.5 %61-48

0.3 %35-49

Missing Data

27.8 %3742MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





OPMETLAM: Meth/LAAM Dispensed-Outpatients

On October 1, 1998, how many of the TOTAL OUTPATIENTS reported in Q15 were receiving methadone or LAAM at this location?


LabelValue



Missing Data

30.0 %4032MISSING-9

- 137 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total




OPMETNUM: Total Methadone Outpatients



LabelValue

0.0 %2-0

0.1 %9-1

0.1 %9-2

0.0 %2-3

0.0 %1-4

0.0 %6-5

0.0 %2-6

0.0 %3-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %3-9

0.0 %6-10

0.0 %2-11

0.0 %2-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %4-14

0.0 %3-15

0.0 %2-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %6-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

- 138 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %3-39

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %6-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %4-48

0.0 %3-49

0.0 %6-50

0.0 %2-51

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %5-55

0.0 %1-56

Missing Data

94.8 %12762MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





OPLAMNUM: Total LAAM Outpatients



LabelValue

4.0 %539-0

0.0 %4-1

- 139 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-2

0.1 %8-3

0.0 %4-4

0.1 %11-5

0.0 %1-6

0.0 %4-7

0.0 %6-8

0.0 %6-9

0.0 %6-10

0.0 %4-11

0.0 %6-12

0.0 %3-13

0.0 %5-14

0.0 %6-15

0.0 %6-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %9-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %4-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %1-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %3-42

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %2-50

0.0 %3-55

0.0 %2-57

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-63

- 140 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-66

0.0 %1-79

0.0 %1-80

0.0 %1-81

0.0 %1-97

0.0 %1-100

Missing Data

94.9 %12770MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_SEX1: Outpatient Male Clients

How many of the total outpatients in Q15d were in each of thefollowing gender, race/ethnicity, and age categories? ###

GENDER

Outpatient clients, male


LabelValue

22.8 %3069-0

1.2 %159-1

1.7 %223-2

1.7 %232-3

1.4 %190-4

1.7 %223-5

1.4 %192-6

1.2 %167-7

1.6 %209-8

1.3 %169-9

- 141 -


LabelValue

1.6 %220-10

1.0 %132-11

1.5 %208-12

0.9 %125-13

1.1 %153-14

1.4 %192-15

0.8 %101-16

0.9 %120-17

1.0 %135-18

0.6 %80-19

1.5 %207-20

0.8 %101-21

0.7 %90-22

0.5 %74-23

0.7 %98-24

1.1 %146-25

0.7 %89-26

0.6 %81-27

0.7 %99-28

0.4 %56-29

1.3 %174-30

0.5 %65-31

0.5 %68-32

0.5 %63-33

0.5 %63-34

0.8 %111-35

0.4 %58-36

0.4 %55-37

0.4 %59-38

0.5 %65-39

1.0 %134-40

0.4 %52-41

0.4 %58-42

0.4 %48-43

0.4 %48-44

0.7 %99-45

0.4 %50-46

0.4 %55-47

0.5 %64-48

0.3 %38-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

- 142 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total





O_SEX2: Outpatient Female Clients


GENDER

Outpatient clients, female


LabelValue

25.5 %3426-0

3.6 %487-1

4.1 %547-2

3.2 %430-3

2.7 %358-4

3.4 %452-5

2.2 %294-6

1.8 %245-7

2.0 %271-8

1.5 %203-9

3.1 %412-10

1.3 %171-11

1.4 %187-12

1.1 %144-13

1.1 %144-14

1.9 %256-15

0.8 %108-16

1.0 %128-17

0.8 %101-18

0.7 %98-19

- 143 -


LabelValue

1.7 %232-20

0.8 %110-21

0.7 %89-22

0.6 %83-23

0.6 %84-24

1.2 %160-25

0.5 %68-26

0.6 %87-27

0.5 %74-28

0.4 %54-29

1.0 %128-30

0.4 %58-31

0.6 %79-32

0.4 %60-33

0.5 %69-34

0.6 %80-35

0.4 %52-36

0.3 %44-37

0.4 %52-38

0.3 %35-39

0.6 %82-40

0.3 %45-41

0.4 %50-42

0.2 %27-43

0.3 %44-44

0.4 %55-45

0.2 %33-46

0.3 %40-47

0.2 %30-48

0.2 %26-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 144 -


O_SEX3: Outpatient Clients Gender,Unknown


GENDER

Outpatient clients, gender unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




O_SEX4: Outpatient Clients Gender,Total

TOTAL OutpatientsHow many of the total outpatients in Q15d were in each of thefollowing gender, race/ethnicity, and age categories? ###

RACE/ETHNICITY


LabelValue

20.3 %2732-0

0.7 %90-1

1.1 %145-2

1.1 %143-3

1.0 %136-4

1.4 %185-5

1.0 %129-6

1.0 %132-7

1.1 %149-8

- 145 -


LabelValue

0.7 %92-9

1.8 %237-10

0.6 %81-11

1.2 %161-12

0.7 %90-13

0.7 %89-14

1.8 %242-15

0.7 %95-16

0.6 %83-17

0.8 %107-18

0.6 %84-19

2.1 %284-20

0.4 %57-21

0.6 %83-22

0.5 %71-23

0.6 %80-24

1.3 %179-25

0.5 %72-26

0.4 %56-27

0.6 %84-28

0.4 %52-29

1.6 %219-30

0.4 %48-31

0.6 %78-32

0.4 %53-33

0.4 %56-34

0.8 %113-35

0.4 %52-36

0.4 %55-37

0.5 %66-38

0.3 %44-39

1.2 %165-40

0.3 %43-41

0.4 %60-42

0.4 %54-43

0.3 %41-44

0.8 %109-45

0.3 %43-46

0.4 %51-47

0.5 %61-48

0.3 %35-49

Missing Data

- 146 -


LabelValue

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_RE1: Outpatient Clients/white


RACE/ETHNICITY

Outpatient clients, white


LabelValue

23.3 %3129-0

1.8 %236-1

2.4 %325-2

2.1 %287-3

1.7 %231-4

2.0 %268-5

1.6 %213-6

1.4 %184-7

1.6 %211-8

1.3 %171-9

1.9 %257-10

1.1 %142-11

1.4 %183-12

1.0 %131-13

1.1 %151-14

1.5 %198-15

0.9 %124-16

1.0 %129-17

1.1 %145-18

- 147 -


LabelValue

0.6 %84-19

1.5 %197-20

0.7 %100-21

0.8 %104-22

0.6 %81-23

0.7 %91-24

1.0 %129-25

0.6 %85-26

0.6 %81-27

0.7 %97-28

0.4 %57-29

1.0 %135-30

0.5 %66-31

0.5 %65-32

0.5 %65-33

0.5 %65-34

0.7 %94-35

0.4 %53-36

0.4 %50-37

0.4 %56-38

0.5 %61-39

0.9 %127-40

0.4 %50-41

0.5 %65-42

0.3 %40-43

0.3 %41-44

0.6 %85-45

0.3 %39-46

0.3 %36-47

0.5 %63-48

0.2 %32-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

0.0 %1--1

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 44.98• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 3000

- 148 -


Location: 412-415 (width: 4; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric(Range of) Missing Values: -9 , -1

O_RE2: Outpatient Clients/black


RACE/ETHNICITY

Outpatient clients, black or African American (not of Hispanicorigin)


LabelValue

38.3 %5150-0

7.3 %976-1

5.4 %732-2

3.5 %470-3

2.5 %330-4

2.8 %378-5

1.9 %253-6

1.1 %142-7

1.4 %190-8

1.1 %153-9

2.0 %269-10

0.8 %110-11

1.0 %129-12

0.7 %93-13

0.8 %102-14

1.0 %133-15

0.6 %78-16

0.5 %72-17

0.6 %82-18

0.4 %54-19

0.9 %126-20

0.5 %61-21

0.5 %63-22

0.4 %58-23

0.3 %44-24

0.5 %74-25

0.3 %44-26

0.3 %38-27

- 149 -


LabelValue

0.3 %46-28

0.3 %40-29

0.5 %71-30

0.2 %30-31

0.3 %36-32

0.2 %23-33

0.3 %45-34

0.3 %38-35

0.2 %29-36

0.2 %27-37

0.2 %22-38

0.2 %21-39

0.3 %44-40

0.2 %24-41

0.2 %24-42

0.1 %14-43

0.2 %28-44

0.3 %39-45

0.1 %14-46

0.2 %23-47

0.2 %24-48

0.2 %21-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_RE3: Outpatient Clients/hispanic


RACE/ETHNICITY

- 150 -

Outpatient clients, Hispanic


LabelValue

48.6 %6534-0

8.0 %1076-1

5.8 %778-2

3.7 %497-3

2.2 %301-4

2.3 %305-5

1.5 %206-6

1.1 %142-7

1.2 %157-8

0.7 %98-9

1.4 %182-10

0.6 %86-11

0.6 %79-12

0.4 %56-13

0.4 %53-14

0.7 %100-15

0.4 %49-16

0.2 %31-17

0.3 %40-18

0.3 %45-19

0.7 %91-20

0.3 %45-21

0.3 %41-22

0.3 %38-23

0.2 %23-24

0.4 %51-25

0.2 %23-26

0.2 %31-27

0.2 %26-28

0.1 %14-29

0.3 %47-30

0.1 %19-31

0.1 %17-32

0.1 %16-33

0.1 %18-34

0.2 %22-35

0.1 %18-36

0.1 %15-37

0.1 %18-38

- 151 -


LabelValue

0.1 %12-39

0.2 %29-40

0.1 %15-41

0.1 %16-42

0.1 %12-43

0.1 %10-44

0.1 %20-45

0.1 %10-46

0.1 %9-47

0.1 %7-48

0.1 %8-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_RE4: Outpatient Clients Asian or Pacific


RACE/ETHNICITY


RACE/ETHNICITY

Outpatient clients, Asian or Pacific Islander


LabelValue

77.5 %10428-0

5.9 %788-1

2.5 %333-2

- 152 -


LabelValue

1.1 %148-3

0.8 %105-4

0.5 %73-5

0.2 %29-6

0.1 %19-7

0.1 %18-8

0.1 %16-9

0.2 %31-10

0.1 %16-11

0.1 %18-12

0.0 %5-13

0.0 %6-14

0.1 %10-15

0.0 %4-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %5-19

0.1 %11-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %5-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %2-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %1-53

- 153 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-63

0.0 %1-65

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_RE5: Outpatient Clients American Indian/A.N.


RACE/ETHNICITY

Outpatient clients, American Indian or Alaskan Native


LabelValue

71.0 %9550-0

7.1 %956-1

3.5 %468-2

1.6 %211-3

1.2 %162-4

1.0 %131-5

0.5 %71-6

0.5 %64-7

0.3 %47-8

0.3 %37-9

0.4 %60-10

- 154 -


LabelValue

0.1 %18-11

0.2 %31-12

0.2 %23-13

0.1 %20-14

0.1 %15-15

0.1 %13-16

0.1 %18-17

0.1 %13-18

0.1 %10-19

0.1 %19-20

0.1 %13-22

0.1 %8-23

0.0 %4-24

0.1 %10-25

0.0 %6-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %6-28

0.0 %4-29

0.1 %7-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %5-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %4-36

0.0 %3-37

0.0 %6-38

0.0 %3-39

0.0 %6-40

0.0 %3-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %3-49

0.1 %7-50

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

- 155 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total





O_RE6: Outpatient Clients of other race/ethnic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Outpatient clients, other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

80.0 %10760-0

4.0 %542-1

1.9 %257-2

1.0 %135-3

0.7 %94-4

0.6 %76-5

0.4 %52-6

0.3 %41-7

0.2 %28-8

0.1 %15-9

0.2 %22-10

0.1 %13-11

0.0 %5-12

0.1 %12-13

0.0 %6-14

0.1 %7-15

0.0 %6-16

0.0 %3-17

- 156 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-18

0.0 %4-19

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %3-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %2-60

0.0 %1-68

0.0 %2-70

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-75

0.0 %1-78

0.0 %1-83

0.0 %1-84

0.0 %1-97

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 0.61• Median: 0.00• Mode: 0.00

- 157 -

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 159• Standard Deviation: 4.75


O_RE7: Outpatient Unknown clients race/ethnic


RACE/ETHNICITY

Outpatient clients, race/ethnicity not known


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




O_RE8: Outpatient Clients race/ethnic total


AGE

TOTAL Outpatients


LabelValue

20.3 %2732-0

0.7 %90-1

1.1 %145-2

1.1 %143-3

- 158 -


LabelValue

1.0 %136-4

1.4 %184-5

1.0 %130-6

1.0 %132-7

1.1 %149-8

0.7 %92-9

1.8 %237-10

0.6 %81-11

1.2 %161-12

0.7 %90-13

0.7 %89-14

1.8 %242-15

0.7 %95-16

0.6 %83-17

0.8 %107-18

0.6 %84-19

2.1 %284-20

0.4 %57-21

0.6 %83-22

0.5 %71-23

0.6 %80-24

1.3 %179-25

0.5 %72-26

0.4 %56-27

0.6 %84-28

0.4 %52-29

1.6 %219-30

0.4 %48-31

0.6 %78-32

0.4 %53-33

0.4 %56-34

0.8 %113-35

0.4 %52-36

0.4 %55-37

0.5 %66-38

0.3 %44-39

1.2 %165-40

0.3 %43-41

0.4 %60-42

0.4 %54-43

0.3 %41-44

0.8 %109-45

- 159 -


LabelValue

0.3 %43-46

0.4 %51-47

0.5 %61-48

0.3 %35-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_AGE1: Outpatient Clients under 18 years old


AGE

Outpatient clients, under 18 years


LabelValue

55.2 %7432-0

5.5 %735-1

3.8 %510-2

2.8 %380-3

2.0 %264-4

2.0 %275-5

1.4 %194-6

1.2 %164-7

1.1 %153-8

0.8 %101-9

1.4 %189-10

0.8 %101-11

0.8 %114-12

0.4 %54-13

- 160 -


LabelValue

0.6 %83-14

0.7 %93-15

0.5 %62-16

0.3 %45-17

0.4 %60-18

0.3 %35-19

0.8 %105-20

0.1 %16-21

0.2 %32-22

0.3 %35-23

0.3 %35-24

0.4 %52-25

0.2 %21-26

0.2 %23-27

0.1 %19-28

0.2 %26-29

0.4 %58-30

0.1 %17-31

0.2 %23-32

0.2 %21-33

0.1 %14-34

0.2 %23-35

0.1 %14-36

0.1 %17-37

0.1 %16-38

0.1 %12-39

0.2 %30-40

0.1 %9-41

0.1 %8-42

0.1 %12-43

0.1 %9-44

0.1 %16-45

0.0 %5-46

0.1 %7-47

0.1 %9-48

0.1 %11-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 161 -




O_AGE2: Outpatient Clients between age 18 - 20


AGE

Outpatient clients, age 18-20


LabelValue

43.5 %5859-0

8.8 %1186-1

7.7 %1035-2

4.7 %631-3

3.5 %469-4

3.8 %515-5

2.0 %274-6

1.4 %191-7

1.4 %192-8

1.1 %148-9

2.0 %264-10

0.7 %94-11

0.9 %116-12

0.5 %61-13

0.4 %57-14

0.9 %119-15

0.4 %50-16

0.3 %43-17

0.4 %51-18

0.3 %46-19

0.8 %106-20

0.3 %36-21

0.3 %43-22

0.1 %20-23

- 162 -


LabelValue

0.2 %29-24

0.3 %38-25

0.1 %17-26

0.1 %15-27

0.1 %14-28

0.1 %12-29

0.4 %50-30

0.1 %12-31

0.1 %15-32

0.0 %5-33

0.1 %11-34

0.1 %17-35

0.1 %9-36

0.1 %11-37

0.1 %16-38

0.0 %5-39

0.2 %23-40

0.1 %8-41

0.1 %12-42

0.1 %8-43

0.0 %4-44

0.1 %9-45

0.0 %6-46

0.0 %5-47

0.1 %7-48

0.0 %6-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 163 -

O_AGE3: Outpatient Clients between age 21 - 24


AGE



LabelValue

35.8 %4822-0

6.6 %887-1

6.3 %851-2

4.8 %650-3

3.8 %517-4

4.8 %651-5

2.5 %331-6

1.7 %231-7

1.9 %259-8

1.3 %180-9

2.9 %385-10

1.1 %143-11

1.2 %156-12

0.9 %120-13

0.8 %109-14

1.4 %190-15

0.6 %76-16

0.6 %76-17

0.6 %81-18

0.4 %52-19

1.3 %177-20

0.3 %38-21

0.4 %57-22

0.3 %44-23

0.5 %61-24

0.6 %78-25

0.2 %29-26

0.3 %40-27

0.2 %30-28

0.2 %25-29

0.6 %80-30

0.2 %28-31

0.3 %34-32

- 164 -


LabelValue

0.2 %21-33

0.1 %20-34

0.2 %31-35

0.1 %20-36

0.1 %18-37

0.1 %12-38

0.1 %17-39

0.4 %48-40

0.1 %11-41

0.1 %8-42

0.1 %7-43

0.1 %16-44

0.1 %18-45

0.1 %10-46

0.1 %8-47

0.1 %8-48

0.1 %11-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_AGE4: Outpatient Clients age 25-34 years


AGE


- 165 -


LabelValue

28.4 %3820-0

3.1 %412-1

3.6 %480-2

2.8 %376-3

2.7 %367-4

3.2 %427-5

2.3 %309-6

1.9 %260-7

2.3 %304-8

1.5 %197-9

3.2 %433-10

1.2 %163-11

1.5 %199-12

1.1 %149-13

1.0 %129-14

1.9 %249-15

0.8 %103-16

1.0 %131-17

1.0 %134-18

0.8 %102-19

2.0 %272-20

0.9 %123-21

0.7 %99-22

0.6 %80-23

0.5 %74-24

1.0 %136-25

0.5 %70-26

0.5 %71-27

0.5 %66-28

0.5 %62-29

1.3 %174-30

0.5 %61-31

0.4 %60-32

0.3 %43-33

0.4 %58-34

0.5 %68-35

0.4 %53-36

0.3 %36-37

0.4 %53-38

0.2 %33-39

0.8 %112-40

0.3 %43-41

- 166 -


LabelValue

0.3 %39-42

0.3 %40-43

0.2 %27-44

0.5 %62-45

0.2 %28-46

0.3 %38-47

0.3 %35-48

0.2 %27-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total







AGE



LabelValue

29.7 %3992-0

3.2 %431-1

4.0 %538-2

3.0 %399-3

2.9 %388-4

3.0 %407-5

2.1 %286-6

1.8 %248-7

1.9 %253-8

1.5 %199-9

- 167 -


LabelValue

3.1 %412-10

1.2 %157-11

1.5 %196-12

1.0 %135-13

0.8 %113-14

1.7 %224-15

0.9 %120-16

0.9 %119-17

0.9 %125-18

0.6 %86-19

1.7 %224-20

0.9 %117-21

0.6 %76-22

0.6 %78-23

0.6 %75-24

0.9 %126-25

0.6 %77-26

0.5 %61-27

0.5 %71-28

0.4 %50-29

1.0 %128-30

0.5 %61-31

0.4 %50-32

0.3 %34-33

0.4 %48-34

0.5 %74-35

0.3 %45-36

0.3 %40-37

0.4 %52-38

0.3 %39-39

0.6 %85-40

0.2 %33-41

0.3 %42-42

0.2 %33-43

0.3 %38-44

0.3 %45-45

0.2 %26-46

0.2 %30-47

0.3 %36-48

0.2 %22-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

- 168 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total







AGE



LabelValue

38.8 %5216-0

5.7 %769-1

5.8 %776-2

3.7 %503-3

2.9 %395-4

3.3 %449-5

2.1 %277-6

1.7 %230-7

1.7 %226-8

1.4 %185-9

2.4 %324-10

1.0 %135-11

1.1 %154-12

1.0 %131-13

0.7 %100-14

1.2 %156-15

0.7 %90-16

0.5 %70-17

0.6 %83-18

0.5 %62-19

- 169 -


LabelValue

0.9 %116-20

0.6 %77-21

0.5 %64-22

0.4 %51-23

0.3 %46-24

0.5 %71-25

0.3 %40-26

0.3 %35-27

0.3 %44-28

0.3 %34-29

0.5 %68-30

0.2 %32-31

0.2 %31-32

0.3 %36-33

0.2 %25-34

0.3 %40-35

0.1 %20-36

0.2 %31-37

0.2 %21-38

0.1 %20-39

0.3 %34-40

0.2 %29-41

0.2 %23-42

0.1 %16-43

0.2 %26-44

0.2 %24-45

0.1 %16-46

0.1 %14-47

0.1 %10-48

0.1 %11-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 170 -



O_AGE7: Outpatient Clients age 65 and over


AGE

Outpatient clients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

68.4 %9201-0

8.0 %1083-1

4.5 %606-2

2.3 %307-3

1.4 %193-4

1.3 %174-5

0.6 %84-6

0.4 %55-7

0.4 %56-8

0.2 %30-9

0.5 %68-10

0.2 %25-11

0.2 %25-12

0.1 %18-13

0.1 %18-14

0.2 %21-15

0.1 %7-16

0.0 %5-17

0.1 %10-18

0.1 %12-19

0.1 %16-20

0.0 %6-21

0.1 %8-22

0.0 %3-23

0.1 %7-24

0.1 %8-25

0.1 %10-26

0.1 %7-27

0.0 %3-28

- 171 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %4-34

0.0 %6-35

0.0 %5-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %2-51

0.0 %2-52

0.0 %2-54

0.0 %1-55

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





O_AGE8: Outpatient Clients age unknown


AGE

- 172 -

Outpatient clients, age unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




O_AGE9: Outpatient Clients age total


AGE

TOTAL Outpatients


LabelValue

20.3 %2732-0

0.7 %90-1

1.1 %145-2

1.1 %143-3

1.0 %136-4

1.4 %185-5

1.0 %129-6

1.0 %132-7

1.1 %149-8

0.7 %92-9

1.8 %237-10

0.6 %81-11

1.2 %161-12

0.7 %90-13

0.7 %89-14

- 173 -


LabelValue

1.8 %242-15

0.7 %95-16

0.6 %83-17

0.8 %107-18

0.6 %84-19

2.1 %284-20

0.4 %57-21

0.6 %83-22

0.5 %71-23

0.6 %80-24

1.3 %179-25

0.5 %72-26

0.4 %56-27

0.6 %84-28

0.4 %52-29

1.6 %219-30

0.4 %48-31

0.6 %78-32

0.4 %53-33

0.4 %56-34

0.8 %113-35

0.4 %52-36

0.4 %55-37

0.5 %66-38

0.3 %44-39

1.2 %165-40

0.3 %43-41

0.4 %60-42

0.4 %54-43

0.3 %41-44

0.8 %109-45

0.3 %43-46

0.4 %51-47

0.5 %61-48

0.3 %35-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 174 -



TOTADMIS: Total # of admissions for Sub Abuse tx

12 Month Admissions. During the 12 months between October 1, 1997 and September 30, 1998, (or the most recent 12 month periodfor which data are available), how many admissions for substance abuse treatment were there at this facility?###


LabelValue

1.6 %220-0

0.2 %24-1

0.2 %29-2

0.3 %34-3

0.2 %33-4

0.3 %39-5

0.3 %37-6

0.3 %42-7

0.3 %34-8

0.2 %24-9

0.7 %98-10

0.2 %31-11

0.4 %57-12

0.1 %17-13

0.2 %27-14

0.6 %80-15

0.2 %30-16

0.2 %26-17

0.3 %44-18

0.2 %21-19

0.9 %116-20

0.2 %32-21

0.2 %33-22

0.2 %28-23

0.3 %42-24

0.7 %91-25

0.2 %28-26

0.3 %37-27

0.2 %33-28

0.2 %25-29

1.0 %140-30

- 175 -


LabelValue

0.2 %23-31

0.3 %40-32

0.2 %28-33

0.2 %22-34

0.5 %70-35

0.3 %44-36

0.3 %36-37

0.3 %36-38

0.2 %24-39

0.8 %111-40

0.2 %28-41

0.3 %42-42

0.3 %38-43

0.2 %23-44

0.5 %66-45

0.2 %24-46

0.3 %34-47

0.4 %49-48

0.2 %33-49

Missing Data

14.0 %1883MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





SACL98: Facility had no SA treatment on 10-1-98

Facility had no treatment on 10-1-98 (survey control variable only).


LabelValue

2.3 %307Yes1

87.2 %11739No2

Missing Data

10.5 %1409MISSING-9

- 176 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total




B_PCT: % of Clients Treated For Alc/Drug Abuse

Approximately what percentage of all substance abuse treatmentclients enrolled at this facility on October 1,1998, were beingtreated for: ### %

c. Both alcohol and drug abuse


LabelValue

8.0 %1079-0

0.3 %41-1

0.4 %48-2

0.3 %40-3

0.2 %27-4

1.0 %133-5

0.2 %29-6

0.3 %35-7

0.3 %45-8

0.1 %19-9

2.2 %293-10

0.2 %22-11

0.3 %44-12

0.2 %22-13

0.3 %40-14

1.0 %141-15

0.3 %36-16

0.2 %27-17

0.2 %29-18

0.3 %36-19

2.8 %383-20

0.2 %27-21

0.3 %46-22

0.3 %41-23

- 177 -


LabelValue

0.2 %32-24

2.2 %301-25

0.2 %28-26

0.3 %39-27

0.2 %29-28

0.3 %38-29

2.7 %360-30

0.2 %28-31

0.3 %47-32

0.7 %99-33

0.5 %70-34

1.1 %142-35

0.3 %47-36

0.3 %40-37

0.3 %44-38

0.2 %32-39

2.7 %364-40

0.2 %26-41

0.3 %43-42

0.4 %51-43

0.3 %44-44

0.9 %123-45

0.3 %45-46

0.3 %35-47

0.3 %38-48

0.3 %36-49

Missing Data

12.6 %1689MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 178 -

A_PCT: % of Clients Treated For Alc Abuse


a. Alcohol abuse only


LabelValue

20.2 %2716-0

0.9 %122-1

1.2 %167-2

0.8 %107-3

0.4 %52-4

3.5 %477-5

0.5 %63-6

0.4 %59-7

0.7 %91-8

0.3 %46-9

6.9 %929-10

0.3 %42-11

0.7 %91-12

0.5 %68-13

0.5 %70-14

2.9 %385-15

0.3 %46-16

0.5 %61-17

0.6 %75-18

0.3 %39-19

6.1 %820-20

0.3 %42-21

0.5 %68-22

0.5 %62-23

0.3 %39-24

4.2 %562-25

0.3 %45-26

0.3 %34-27

0.4 %49-28

0.4 %53-29

3.4 %457-30

0.3 %40-31

0.4 %53-32

0.9 %127-33

- 179 -


LabelValue

0.3 %40-34

1.0 %129-35

0.3 %43-36

0.3 %37-37

0.3 %38-38

0.3 %35-39

2.3 %310-40

0.2 %33-41

0.3 %44-42

0.2 %28-43

0.2 %27-44

0.7 %90-45

0.3 %37-46

0.2 %30-47

0.2 %32-48

0.2 %28-49

Missing Data

12.5 %1688MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





D_PCT: % of Clients Treated For Drug Abuse


b. Drug abuse only


LabelValue

27.6 %3707-0

- 180 -


LabelValue

1.0 %134-1

1.4 %182-2

0.8 %109-3

0.7 %88-4

4.5 %599-5

0.6 %84-6

0.7 %97-7

0.8 %109-8

0.6 %87-9

9.1 %1220-10

0.5 %69-11

0.9 %124-12

0.6 %81-13

0.5 %71-14

3.3 %448-15

0.6 %75-16

0.7 %95-17

0.5 %73-18

0.4 %58-19

5.9 %796-20

0.5 %66-21

0.5 %71-22

0.5 %64-23

0.3 %38-24

3.8 %512-25

0.4 %54-26

0.3 %41-27

0.4 %48-28

0.4 %50-29

2.4 %317-30

0.3 %39-31

0.2 %24-32

0.6 %82-33

0.3 %45-34

0.8 %104-35

0.3 %34-36

0.2 %23-37

0.2 %25-38

0.1 %19-39

1.3 %178-40

0.1 %19-41

0.2 %25-42

- 181 -


LabelValue

0.2 %24-43

0.2 %22-44

0.3 %47-45

0.1 %16-46

0.1 %19-47

0.1 %18-48

0.1 %15-49

Missing Data

12.6 %1689MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





INJPCT: Percentage of injection drug users

Approximately what percent of all substance abuse treatmentclients enrolled at this facility on October 1, 1998, were in thefollowing categories? ### %

a. Injection drug users at the time of admission


LabelValue

25.9 %3485-0

4.9 %659-1

3.6 %485-2

2.0 %268-3

1.1 %145-4

5.0 %669-5

0.9 %118-6

0.7 %99-7

0.9 %119-8

0.4 %53-9

- 182 -


LabelValue

5.1 %688-10

0.4 %58-11

0.6 %84-12

0.4 %48-13

0.4 %55-14

1.7 %233-15

0.2 %30-16

0.4 %49-17

0.3 %46-18

0.1 %17-19

2.6 %351-20

0.2 %30-21

0.2 %31-22

0.1 %19-23

0.2 %24-24

1.4 %183-25

0.1 %17-26

0.1 %20-27

0.1 %15-28

0.1 %16-29

1.2 %161-30

0.0 %5-31

0.1 %14-32

0.3 %42-33

0.1 %13-34

0.5 %61-35

0.0 %6-36

0.1 %10-37

0.1 %11-38

0.0 %6-39

1.0 %140-40

0.0 %3-41

0.1 %10-42

0.0 %6-43

0.1 %11-44

0.2 %28-45

0.1 %9-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %4-48

0.0 %3-49

Missing Data

29.9 %4024MISSING-9

- 183 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total





TBPCT: Percentage of clients w/ tuberculosis


b. Known to have an active case of tuberculosis (TB)


LabelValue

52.5 %7067-0

4.3 %572-1

1.4 %185-2

0.5 %74-3

0.2 %31-4

1.0 %130-5

0.1 %17-6

0.1 %10-7

0.1 %10-8

0.0 %2-9

0.4 %55-10

0.0 %3-11

0.1 %7-12

0.0 %3-14

0.1 %16-15

0.0 %2-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %1-19

0.1 %16-20

- 184 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-22

0.1 %8-25

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-35

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-67

0.0 %1-100

Missing Data

38.8 %5227MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




HIVPCT: Percentage of clients with HIV


c. HIV positive


LabelValue

31.1 %4183-0

7.4 %991-1

3.7 %494-2

2.1 %276-3

1.0 %132-4

3.5 %474-5

- 185 -


LabelValue

0.6 %80-6

0.5 %61-7

0.6 %82-8

0.2 %28-9

2.3 %307-10

0.2 %22-11

0.3 %37-12

0.1 %18-13

0.1 %18-14

0.7 %99-15

0.1 %7-16

0.1 %13-17

0.2 %22-18

0.1 %12-19

0.7 %96-20

0.0 %5-21

0.0 %5-22

0.0 %5-23

0.1 %8-24

0.5 %64-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %6-28

0.0 %4-29

0.2 %32-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-32

0.1 %13-33

0.0 %1-34

0.1 %10-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-37

0.1 %19-40

0.0 %1-42

0.1 %14-45

0.0 %1-48

0.1 %16-50

0.0 %2-53

0.0 %2-55

0.0 %4-60

0.0 %1-65

0.0 %1-66

- 186 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-68

0.0 %6-70

Missing Data

42.6 %5737MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





PREVPCT: Percentage of clients who prev rcd tx


d. Had previously received substance abuse treatment from this oranother facility


LabelValue

2.1 %284-0

0.7 %88-1

0.7 %100-2

0.5 %61-3

0.3 %46-4

1.5 %204-5

0.1 %19-6

0.2 %25-7

0.3 %38-8

0.1 %19-9

3.2 %437-10

0.2 %32-11

0.4 %51-12

0.1 %20-13

- 187 -


LabelValue

0.2 %26-14

1.5 %197-15

0.1 %20-16

0.2 %30-17

0.2 %30-18

0.1 %17-19

3.9 %522-20

0.2 %25-21

0.3 %37-22

0.2 %27-23

0.2 %24-24

3.2 %428-25

0.1 %19-26

0.2 %26-27

0.3 %39-28

0.2 %25-29

3.6 %479-30

0.2 %27-31

0.3 %39-32

0.8 %114-33

0.2 %26-34

1.4 %184-35

0.2 %29-36

0.3 %39-37

0.3 %43-38

0.2 %28-39

3.6 %483-40

0.2 %22-41

0.4 %56-42

0.2 %29-43

0.2 %33-44

1.0 %134-45

0.2 %32-46

0.2 %24-47

0.3 %42-48

0.2 %28-49

Missing Data

24.9 %3345MISSING-9

100%13,455Total


- 188 -




MGDPCT: Percent of clients covered by mgd care


e. Covered by managed care arrangements


LabelValue

31.4 %4229-0

1.8 %239-1

1.4 %186-2

0.6 %84-3

0.4 %49-4

2.5 %338-5

0.3 %42-6

0.2 %30-7

0.4 %53-8

0.2 %30-9

3.3 %441-10

0.2 %26-11

0.3 %41-12

0.2 %29-13

0.1 %20-14

1.1 %145-15

0.2 %21-16

0.2 %24-17

0.1 %18-18

0.1 %11-19

2.1 %289-20

0.2 %24-21

0.1 %14-22

0.0 %4-23

- 189 -


LabelValue

0.2 %25-24

1.3 %178-25

0.1 %15-26

0.1 %19-27

0.1 %14-28

0.1 %15-29

1.4 %195-30

0.1 %12-31

0.1 %9-32

0.4 %56-33

0.1 %8-34

0.5 %66-35

0.1 %9-36

0.1 %9-37

0.1 %12-38

0.1 %11-39

1.5 %199-40

0.1 %8-41

0.1 %8-42

0.1 %8-43

0.0 %5-44

0.3 %40-45

0.1 %12-46

0.0 %5-47

0.1 %8-48

0.0 %3-49

Missing Data

32.0 %4312MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 190 -

CTPCT: Percent of court referred clients


f. Criminal justice referred clients (excluding DUI/DWI)


LabelValue

14.4 %1932-0

1.8 %241-1

1.6 %222-2

0.9 %121-3

0.5 %71-4

3.5 %465-5

0.6 %76-6

0.4 %50-7

0.5 %69-8

0.4 %54-9

5.2 %704-10

0.4 %48-11

0.5 %64-12

0.3 %45-13

0.4 %49-14

1.9 %261-15

0.4 %48-16

0.3 %43-17

0.4 %58-18

0.2 %28-19

3.9 %524-20

0.3 %35-21

0.3 %47-22

0.3 %36-23

0.3 %41-24

2.5 %330-25

0.2 %29-26

0.3 %39-27

0.3 %41-28

0.2 %21-29

2.3 %308-30

0.2 %23-31

0.2 %29-32

0.6 %77-33

- 191 -


LabelValue

0.1 %13-34

1.1 %146-35

0.2 %30-36

0.2 %26-37

0.3 %46-38

0.1 %13-39

2.2 %296-40

0.1 %20-41

0.2 %21-42

0.3 %36-43

0.2 %27-44

0.8 %104-45

0.2 %21-46

0.2 %22-47

0.2 %31-48

0.1 %14-49

Missing Data

24.4 %3281MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





PREGPCT: Percentage of clients pregnant


g. Pregnant women


LabelValue

44.7 %6012-0

- 192 -


LabelValue

9.8 %1323-1

4.9 %653-2

1.8 %238-3

0.9 %122-4

3.6 %487-5

0.4 %57-6

0.4 %55-7

0.4 %53-8

0.1 %20-9

1.8 %247-10

0.1 %20-11

0.2 %21-12

0.1 %9-13

0.1 %11-14

0.4 %52-15

0.1 %8-16

0.0 %6-17

0.1 %7-18

0.0 %2-19

0.4 %56-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %4-24

0.3 %36-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %2-29

0.2 %27-30

0.0 %1-32

0.1 %12-33

0.0 %3-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-37

0.1 %17-40

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.1 %18-50

0.0 %1-52

- 193 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %4-60

0.0 %1-66

0.0 %1-67

0.0 %2-70

Missing Data

28.4 %3824MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





DEPPCT: Percentage of women w/ dep children


h. Mothers with dependent children under 18 years old


LabelValue

22.4 %3018-0

2.7 %366-1

2.1 %280-2

1.7 %224-3

1.0 %134-4

4.0 %532-5

0.8 %112-6

0.8 %104-7

1.4 %184-8

0.7 %92-9

- 194 -


LabelValue

5.3 %709-10

0.8 %113-11

1.0 %140-12

0.7 %89-13

0.8 %106-14

2.6 %354-15

0.7 %90-16

0.5 %71-17

0.7 %93-18

0.4 %59-19

3.6 %479-20

0.4 %51-21

0.5 %70-22

0.3 %46-23

0.2 %32-24

2.0 %270-25

0.3 %40-26

0.3 %37-27

0.3 %41-28

0.2 %26-29

1.6 %221-30

0.2 %21-31

0.2 %27-32

0.5 %67-33

0.1 %13-34

0.6 %78-35

0.1 %17-36

0.1 %13-37

0.1 %15-38

0.0 %6-39

0.8 %109-40

0.1 %9-41

0.1 %9-42

0.1 %12-43

0.0 %6-44

0.1 %19-45

0.1 %7-46

0.0 %5-47

0.1 %7-48

0.0 %5-49

Missing Data

31.0 %4173MISSING-9

- 195 -


LabelValue

100%13,455Total





OPMLTOTL: Total Methadone/LAAM Outpatients

### Total methadone / LAAM outpatients


LabelValue

0.0 %1-0

0.1 %9-1

0.1 %10-2

0.0 %2-3

0.0 %5-5

0.0 %3-6

0.0 %4-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %2-9

0.0 %6-10

0.0 %2-11

0.0 %2-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %4-14

0.0 %3-15

0.0 %2-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %1-18

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %3-24

- 196 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %2-39

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %6-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %3-49

0.0 %5-50

0.0 %2-51

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %6-55

Missing Data

94.8 %12762MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 197 -

HIMLTOTL: Total Methadone/LAAM Inpatients

### Total methadone / LAAM hospital inpatients


LabelValue

0.2 %21-1

0.1 %8-2

0.1 %9-3

0.1 %8-4

0.0 %2-5

0.1 %8-6

0.0 %5-7

0.0 %6-8

0.0 %2-9

0.0 %4-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %3-16

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-120

Missing Data

99.3 %13366MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




RCMLTOTL: Total Methadone/LAAM Residential

### Total methadone / LAAM residential clients

- 198 -


LabelValue

0.1 %13-1

0.0 %6-2

0.0 %5-3

0.0 %2-4

0.0 %2-5

0.0 %3-6

0.0 %2-7

0.0 %2-8

0.1 %7-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %1-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-61

Missing Data

99.6 %13398MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




MALE: TOTAL OF MALES

### Total Male clients


LabelValue

8.4 %1131-0

1.4 %192-1

- 199 -


LabelValue

1.8 %243-2

1.9 %254-3

1.7 %229-4

1.9 %249-5

1.9 %249-6

1.6 %220-7

2.0 %275-8

1.7 %228-9

2.1 %285-10

1.3 %175-11

2.0 %263-12

1.2 %162-13

1.5 %206-14

1.9 %256-15

1.1 %152-16

1.2 %158-17

1.4 %190-18

0.8 %113-19

1.8 %240-20

1.0 %138-21

1.0 %135-22

0.8 %101-23

1.0 %139-24

1.3 %171-25

0.8 %108-26

0.8 %107-27

0.9 %124-28

0.7 %95-29

1.5 %196-30

0.6 %84-31

0.6 %78-32

0.5 %73-33

0.6 %75-34

1.0 %130-35

0.5 %65-36

0.6 %78-37

0.6 %75-38

0.6 %81-39

1.1 %148-40

0.5 %73-41

0.6 %79-42

0.5 %62-43

- 200 -


LabelValue

0.5 %63-44

0.8 %105-45

0.5 %71-46

0.5 %63-47

0.6 %78-48

0.3 %42-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





FEMALE: TOTAL OF FEMALES

### Total Female clients


LabelValue

13.6 %1836-0

4.2 %571-1

4.6 %616-2

3.7 %495-3

3.5 %469-4

4.0 %539-5

3.1 %414-6

2.3 %310-7

2.6 %356-8

1.9 %259-9

3.4 %454-10

1.6 %212-11

1.9 %261-12

1.5 %198-13

1.4 %184-14

2.1 %277-15

1.2 %160-16

- 201 -


LabelValue

1.2 %165-17

1.0 %140-18

0.9 %123-19

2.0 %265-20

0.9 %123-21

0.8 %112-22

0.7 %96-23

0.8 %109-24

1.2 %166-25

0.7 %90-26

0.7 %95-27

0.7 %95-28

0.5 %62-29

1.1 %151-30

0.6 %77-31

0.6 %81-32

0.5 %68-33

0.5 %74-34

0.6 %85-35

0.5 %61-36

0.4 %53-37

0.4 %59-38

0.3 %38-39

0.7 %88-40

0.4 %58-41

0.4 %58-42

0.2 %31-43

0.4 %52-44

0.4 %56-45

0.3 %38-46

0.3 %46-47

0.2 %30-48

0.3 %36-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



• Mean: 26.60• Minimum: 0

- 202 -

• Maximum: 2040• Standard Deviation: 59.48


UNKNOWN: TOTAL OF UNKNOWN SEX

### Total clients with unknown gender


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




TTLGNDR: TOTAL OF BOTH SEXES

### Total clients, both sexes


LabelValue

3.0 %399-0

0.8 %112-1

1.2 %160-2

1.1 %152-3

1.2 %158-4

1.7 %226-5

1.5 %204-6

1.2 %161-7

1.6 %221-8

1.1 %143-9

2.2 %298-10

1.0 %141-11

1.8 %246-12

1.0 %139-13

1.2 %159-14

- 203 -


LabelValue

2.3 %312-15

1.4 %186-16

1.1 %146-17

1.1 %154-18

1.0 %134-19

2.4 %326-20

0.7 %98-21

1.0 %128-22

0.7 %96-23

0.9 %127-24

1.5 %204-25

0.7 %99-26

0.6 %79-27

1.0 %133-28

0.6 %77-29

1.8 %242-30

0.6 %78-31

0.7 %96-32

0.6 %77-33

0.5 %74-34

1.0 %136-35

0.5 %71-36

0.6 %79-37

0.7 %89-38

0.4 %50-39

1.5 %203-40

0.5 %63-41

0.7 %89-42

0.5 %67-43

0.4 %49-44

0.9 %118-45

0.5 %64-46

0.5 %67-47

0.5 %74-48

0.3 %45-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total



- 204 -



WHITE: TOTAL OF WHITES

### Total white clients


LabelValue

6.8 %910-0

2.3 %309-1

3.1 %417-2

2.8 %379-3

2.6 %345-4

2.7 %363-5

2.4 %323-6

1.9 %255-7

2.3 %313-8

1.9 %260-9

2.4 %323-10

1.6 %218-11

2.0 %268-12

1.5 %201-13

1.5 %207-14

1.7 %235-15

1.3 %170-16

1.3 %172-17

1.3 %176-18

1.0 %135-19

1.7 %233-20

1.0 %139-21

1.0 %134-22

0.9 %122-23

0.9 %118-24

1.2 %159-25

0.9 %125-26

0.8 %105-27

0.9 %124-28

0.6 %77-29

1.2 %156-30

0.6 %83-31

- 205 -


LabelValue

0.6 %85-32

0.6 %84-33

0.6 %76-34

0.8 %109-35

0.5 %68-36

0.5 %73-37

0.5 %66-38

0.5 %70-39

1.0 %131-40

0.4 %59-41

0.6 %77-42

0.4 %48-43

0.4 %50-44

0.7 %93-45

0.4 %51-46

0.3 %41-47

0.5 %66-48

0.3 %34-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

0.0 %1--1

100%13,455Total




Location: 531-534 (width: 4; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric(Range of) Missing Values: -9 , -1

BLACK: TOTAL OF BLACKS

### Total black or African American clients


LabelValue

23.8 %3208-0

8.6 %1151-1

7.0 %939-2

4.7 %631-3

- 206 -


LabelValue

3.5 %467-4

3.5 %476-5

2.6 %351-6

1.7 %235-7

2.0 %275-8

1.6 %209-9

2.5 %332-10

1.0 %138-11

1.2 %167-12

1.0 %131-13

1.1 %143-14

1.3 %174-15

0.8 %103-16

0.6 %85-17

0.7 %93-18

0.6 %86-19

1.1 %152-20

0.5 %74-21

0.6 %83-22

0.6 %82-23

0.5 %69-24

0.7 %91-25

0.4 %51-26

0.4 %53-27

0.4 %49-28

0.4 %59-29

0.6 %81-30

0.3 %44-31

0.3 %43-32

0.3 %38-33

0.3 %47-34

0.3 %47-35

0.3 %46-36

0.3 %41-37

0.3 %37-38

0.2 %33-39

0.4 %48-40

0.2 %28-41

0.3 %37-42

0.1 %19-43

0.2 %25-44

0.3 %41-45

- 207 -


LabelValue

0.2 %25-46

0.2 %24-47

0.2 %30-48

0.2 %23-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





HISPANIC: TOTAL OF HISPANICS


LabelValue

38.1 %5133-0

10.6 %1426-1

7.5 %1003-2

4.7 %631-3

3.0 %405-4

2.8 %378-5

2.1 %276-6

1.3 %179-7

1.4 %183-8

0.9 %126-9

1.6 %212-10

0.8 %102-11

0.8 %108-12

0.6 %83-13

0.6 %78-14

0.9 %121-15

0.4 %58-16

0.3 %47-17

0.3 %47-18

0.4 %56-19

- 208 -


LabelValue

0.7 %97-20

0.4 %48-21

0.4 %49-22

0.3 %38-23

0.2 %30-24

0.4 %60-25

0.2 %30-26

0.3 %39-27

0.2 %32-28

0.2 %24-29

0.3 %42-30

0.2 %23-31

0.2 %21-32

0.1 %18-33

0.2 %24-34

0.2 %24-35

0.1 %17-36

0.2 %21-37

0.1 %20-38

0.1 %14-39

0.3 %35-40

0.1 %18-41

0.1 %17-42

0.1 %13-43

0.1 %10-44

0.1 %19-45

0.1 %11-46

0.1 %13-47

0.1 %7-48

0.1 %8-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 209 -


ASIAN: TOTAL OF ASIANS

### Total Asian or Pacific Islander clients


LabelValue

75.6 %10177-0

7.0 %947-1

2.8 %371-2

1.3 %176-3

0.8 %113-4

0.5 %73-5

0.3 %36-6

0.2 %21-7

0.1 %20-8

0.1 %17-9

0.2 %30-10

0.1 %15-11

0.1 %19-12

0.1 %7-13

0.0 %5-14

0.1 %11-15

0.0 %5-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %12-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %6-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %2-38

0.0 %2-39

- 210 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-63

0.0 %1-65

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





AMERINDN: TOTAL OF AMER. INDIANS

### Total American Indian or Alaska Native clients


LabelValue

67.2 %9040-0

8.7 %1173-1

4.2 %561-2

1.9 %254-3

1.4 %192-4

1.1 %150-5

0.7 %88-6

0.5 %73-7

- 211 -


LabelValue

0.4 %51-8

0.3 %46-9

0.5 %63-10

0.2 %24-11

0.3 %35-12

0.2 %28-13

0.2 %28-14

0.1 %12-15

0.1 %15-16

0.2 %25-17

0.1 %17-18

0.1 %7-19

0.2 %25-20

0.0 %3-21

0.1 %13-22

0.1 %10-23

0.1 %9-24

0.1 %10-25

0.1 %7-26

0.0 %6-27

0.1 %8-28

0.0 %2-29

0.1 %7-30

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %6-32

0.0 %5-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %5-35

0.0 %4-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %4-39

0.1 %7-40

0.0 %5-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %6-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %4-49

- 212 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





OTHER: TOTAL OF OTHER RACES

### Total clients of other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

78.2 %10517-0

5.0 %667-1

2.2 %301-2

1.2 %164-3

0.8 %106-4

0.6 %84-5

0.4 %53-6

0.3 %45-7

0.2 %31-8

0.1 %17-9

0.2 %26-10

0.1 %14-11

0.1 %7-12

0.1 %13-13

0.0 %6-14

0.1 %8-15

0.0 %6-16

0.0 %3-17

0.0 %3-18

0.0 %5-19

0.0 %4-20

- 213 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-59

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-64

0.0 %1-68

0.0 %2-70

0.0 %1-72

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-75

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 214 -


UNKRACE: TOTAL OF UNKNOWN RACE

### Total clients with unknown race/ethnicity


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




TTLRACE: TOTAL OF ALL RACES

### Total clients, all races


LabelValue

12.7 %1715-0

0.8 %112-1

1.2 %160-2

1.1 %152-3

1.2 %158-4

1.7 %226-5

1.5 %204-6

1.2 %161-7

1.6 %221-8

1.1 %143-9

2.2 %298-10

1.0 %141-11

1.8 %246-12

1.0 %139-13

1.2 %159-14

2.3 %312-15

1.4 %186-16

1.1 %146-17

- 215 -


LabelValue

1.1 %154-18

1.0 %134-19

2.4 %326-20

0.7 %98-21

1.0 %128-22

0.7 %96-23

0.9 %127-24

1.5 %204-25

0.7 %99-26

0.6 %79-27

1.0 %133-28

0.6 %77-29

1.8 %242-30

0.6 %78-31

0.7 %96-32

0.6 %77-33

0.5 %74-34

1.0 %136-35

0.5 %71-36

0.6 %79-37

0.7 %89-38

0.4 %50-39

1.5 %203-40

0.5 %63-41

0.7 %89-42

0.5 %67-43

0.4 %49-44

0.9 %118-45

0.5 %64-46

0.5 %67-47

0.5 %74-48

0.3 %45-49

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 216 -


UNDER18: TOTAL OF UNDER18

### Total clients under age 18


LabelValue

49.9 %6718-0

6.4 %865-1

4.3 %585-2

3.0 %402-3

2.3 %304-4

2.2 %295-5

1.6 %214-6

1.4 %183-7

1.3 %174-8

0.8 %113-9

1.5 %197-10

0.9 %121-11

1.0 %138-12

0.6 %78-13

0.8 %104-14

0.8 %111-15

0.6 %81-16

0.5 %62-17

0.5 %71-18

0.4 %49-19

0.8 %111-20

0.2 %22-21

0.3 %42-22

0.3 %41-23

0.3 %37-24

0.4 %56-25

0.2 %27-26

0.2 %30-27

0.2 %27-28

0.2 %28-29

0.4 %59-30

0.2 %27-31

0.2 %27-32

0.2 %22-33

0.1 %19-34

0.2 %32-35

- 217 -


LabelValue

0.1 %18-36

0.2 %21-37

0.1 %20-38

0.1 %13-39

0.3 %37-40

0.1 %11-41

0.1 %11-42

0.1 %12-43

0.1 %14-44

0.1 %15-45

0.0 %6-46

0.1 %11-47

0.1 %9-48

0.1 %11-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





X18_20: TOTAL OF AGES 18-20

### Total clients age 18-20


LabelValue

33.9 %4555-0

12.0 %1617-1

9.6 %1295-2

5.7 %772-3

4.1 %552-4

4.2 %567-5

2.5 %338-6

- 218 -


LabelValue

1.8 %236-7

1.6 %220-8

1.3 %174-9

2.2 %293-10

0.8 %107-11

1.0 %130-12

0.5 %73-13

0.5 %65-14

0.9 %121-15

0.4 %59-16

0.4 %49-17

0.4 %50-18

0.4 %54-19

0.8 %108-20

0.3 %47-21

0.4 %52-22

0.2 %26-23

0.2 %23-24

0.3 %43-25

0.2 %23-26

0.1 %16-27

0.1 %14-28

0.1 %15-29

0.4 %50-30

0.1 %18-31

0.1 %15-32

0.1 %9-33

0.1 %11-34

0.1 %18-35

0.1 %12-36

0.1 %11-37

0.1 %13-38

0.1 %8-39

0.1 %18-40

0.1 %8-41

0.1 %16-42

0.1 %12-43

0.0 %6-44

0.1 %8-45

0.1 %7-46

0.1 %9-47

0.0 %6-48

- 219 -


LabelValue

0.0 %5-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total








LabelValue

23.6 %3169-0

9.0 %1211-1

8.4 %1130-2

6.2 %836-3

5.0 %678-4

5.5 %738-5

3.2 %431-6

2.2 %290-7

2.2 %298-8

1.7 %230-9

3.2 %436-10

1.4 %187-11

1.3 %173-12

1.0 %139-13

1.0 %134-14

1.5 %197-15

0.7 %96-16

0.7 %92-17

0.7 %97-18

0.5 %65-19

- 220 -


LabelValue

1.3 %178-20

0.3 %46-21

0.5 %71-22

0.4 %55-23

0.5 %64-24

0.6 %75-25

0.3 %34-26

0.3 %43-27

0.2 %33-28

0.2 %24-29

0.6 %84-30

0.2 %32-31

0.3 %36-32

0.3 %34-33

0.2 %22-34

0.3 %36-35

0.2 %22-36

0.2 %22-37

0.1 %17-38

0.2 %21-39

0.3 %44-40

0.1 %15-41

0.1 %11-42

0.1 %8-43

0.1 %15-44

0.2 %22-45

0.1 %13-46

0.1 %12-47

0.1 %8-48

0.1 %13-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total




- 221 -






LabelValue

13.7 %1847-0

3.8 %518-1

4.4 %595-2

3.7 %499-3

3.8 %505-4

3.9 %529-5

3.3 %439-6

2.8 %372-7

2.8 %381-8

2.2 %296-9

3.7 %500-10

1.6 %220-11

2.1 %281-12

1.4 %189-13

1.2 %161-14

2.1 %287-15

1.1 %148-16

1.2 %168-17

1.2 %160-18

1.0 %134-19

2.3 %316-20

1.0 %140-21

0.9 %124-22

0.8 %102-23

0.6 %83-24

1.2 %160-25

0.6 %82-26

0.7 %92-27

0.6 %84-28

0.6 %77-29

1.4 %188-30

0.5 %70-31

0.5 %66-32

0.5 %64-33

- 222 -


LabelValue

0.5 %65-34

0.6 %82-35

0.4 %49-36

0.4 %49-37

0.4 %60-38

0.3 %47-39

0.8 %106-40

0.4 %48-41

0.3 %43-42

0.3 %47-43

0.3 %37-44

0.5 %72-45

0.3 %39-46

0.3 %44-47

0.3 %39-48

0.2 %28-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total








LabelValue

15.0 %2018-0

4.1 %558-1

5.1 %689-2

4.3 %580-3

3.7 %501-4

4.0 %535-5

3.1 %416-6

- 223 -


LabelValue

2.5 %341-7

2.8 %373-8

2.1 %276-9

3.5 %471-10

1.6 %220-11

1.8 %242-12

1.3 %180-13

1.2 %159-14

2.0 %267-15

1.2 %159-16

1.1 %142-17

1.1 %144-18

0.8 %108-19

1.9 %251-20

1.0 %137-21

0.7 %89-22

0.7 %96-23

0.7 %100-24

1.0 %140-25

0.7 %94-26

0.5 %66-27

0.6 %82-28

0.4 %60-29

1.0 %134-30

0.5 %72-31

0.5 %72-32

0.4 %49-33

0.5 %63-34

0.6 %80-35

0.4 %49-36

0.3 %39-37

0.5 %63-38

0.3 %47-39

0.7 %91-40

0.3 %36-41

0.4 %54-42

0.3 %41-43

0.3 %41-44

0.4 %56-45

0.2 %27-46

0.3 %37-47

0.3 %34-48

- 224 -


LabelValue

0.2 %26-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total








LabelValue

26.7 %3594-0

8.4 %1124-1

7.6 %1027-2

5.3 %711-3

3.9 %528-4

4.1 %548-5

2.7 %368-6

2.1 %286-7

2.0 %274-8

1.6 %221-9

2.8 %372-10

1.4 %189-11

1.2 %165-12

1.1 %152-13

0.9 %125-14

1.3 %175-15

0.8 %103-16

0.6 %83-17

0.7 %88-18

0.5 %74-19

0.9 %122-20

0.6 %81-21

- 225 -


LabelValue

0.5 %68-22

0.4 %57-23

0.4 %57-24

0.5 %71-25

0.4 %49-26

0.3 %46-27

0.4 %48-28

0.3 %35-29

0.5 %72-30

0.2 %30-31

0.2 %31-32

0.3 %38-33

0.2 %33-34

0.3 %47-35

0.2 %22-36

0.2 %27-37

0.2 %21-38

0.2 %21-39

0.3 %36-40

0.2 %25-41

0.2 %31-42

0.1 %19-43

0.2 %33-44

0.2 %23-45

0.1 %18-46

0.2 %21-47

0.1 %11-48

0.1 %9-49

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





- 226 -

OVER65: TOTAL OF OVER 65

### Total clients over age 64


LabelValue

66.1 %8889-0

9.2 %1241-1

4.9 %660-2

2.5 %334-3

1.7 %223-4

1.4 %184-5

0.7 %92-6

0.5 %63-7

0.4 %58-8

0.3 %36-9

0.5 %68-10

0.2 %27-11

0.2 %25-12

0.1 %20-13

0.1 %19-14

0.2 %22-15

0.1 %7-16

0.0 %5-17

0.1 %8-18

0.1 %13-19

0.1 %13-20

0.1 %7-21

0.1 %9-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %6-24

0.1 %10-25

0.1 %11-26

0.1 %7-27

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %4-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %5-34

0.0 %6-35

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

- 227 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %5-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %2-52

Missing Data

9.8 %1316MISSING-9

100%13,455Total





UNKAGE: TOTAL OF UNKNOWN AGES

### Total clients with age unknown


LabelValue

100.0 %13455-0

Missing Data

100%13,455Total



- 228 -


TTLAGE: TOTAL OF ALL AGES

### Total clients, all ages


LabelValue

12.7 %1715-0

0.8 %112-1

1.2 %160-2

1.1 %152-3

1.2 %158-4

1.7 %226-5

1.5 %204-6

1.2 %161-7

1.6 %221-8

1.1 %143-9

2.2 %298-10

1.0 %141-11

1.8 %246-12

1.0 %139-13

1.2 %159-14

2.3 %312-15

1.4 %186-16

1.1 %146-17

1.1 %154-18

1.0 %134-19

2.4 %326-20

0.7 %98-21

1.0 %128-22

0.7 %96-23

0.9 %127-24

1.5 %204-25

0.7 %99-26

0.6 %79-27

1.0 %133-28

0.6 %77-29

1.8 %242-30

0.6 %78-31

0.7 %96-32

0.6 %77-33

0.5 %74-34

1.0 %136-35

- 229 -


LabelValue

0.5 %71-36

0.6 %79-37

0.7 %89-38

0.4 %50-39

1.5 %203-40

0.5 %63-41

0.7 %89-42

0.5 %67-43

0.4 %49-44

0.9 %118-45

0.5 %64-46

0.5 %67-47

0.5 %74-48

0.3 %45-49

Missing Data

100%13,455Total





H_SEX1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR H_SEX1

Imputation Flag - H_SEX1


LabelValue

99.8 %13434Value not imputed0

0.0 %6Value Imputed1

0.1 %15Value not imputed/not used in imputation2

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 230 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 231 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




H_RE1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR H_RE1

Imputation Flag - H_RE1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 232 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 233 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 234 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




H_AGE1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR H_AGE1

Imputation Flag - H_AGE1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 235 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 236 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 237 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 238 -


O_SEX1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR O_SEX1

Imputation Flag - O_SEX1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 239 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




O_RE1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR O_RE1

Imputation Flag - O_RE1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 240 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 241 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 242 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




O_AGE1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR O_AGE1

Imputation Flag - O_AGE1


LabelValue




- 243 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 244 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 245 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 246 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




R_SEX1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR R_SEX1

Imputation Flag - R_SEX1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 247 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 248 -


R_RE1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR R_RE1

Imputation Flag - R_RE1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 249 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 250 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 251 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total




R_AGE1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR R_AGE1

Imputation Flag - R_AGE1


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 252 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 253 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 254 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




TCLI1FL: EDIT FLAG FOR T_CLI1

Imputation Flag - T_CLI1


LabelValue




- 255 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 256 -





LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




- 257 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

100%13,455Total







LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




TCLIRCFL: EDIT FLAG FOR T_CLIRC

Imputation Flag - T_CLIRC


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 258 -


TCLIOPFL: EDIT FLAG FOR T_CLIOP

Imputation Flag - T_CLIOP


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




TCLIHIFL: EDIT FLAG FOR T_CLIHI

Imputation Flag - T_CLIHI


LabelValue




Missing Data

100%13,455Total




- 259 -

A.1

Appendix A

UFDS 1998 Questionnaire

This Appendix contains a complete copy ofthe 1998 UFDS questionnaire that was sent

by mail to all facilities. As noted in Chapter 1, 78percent of the 13,455 responding treatmentfacilities completed this version of thequestionnaire. An additional 22 percent offacilities completed a slightly abbreviated versionof the mail questionnaire that was administeredby telephone. These were facilities that, afterrepeated efforts detailed in Chapter 1, had notcompleted the mail survey. The telephoneinterview was conducted using computer-

assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). Aprinted version of the CATI interview is notincluded here because it contains embeddedinstructions and skip patterns that make itdifficult to read.

The CATI interview included all items from themail survey except the detailed check list ofsubstance abuse services (Question 7). However,the section of this check list concerningprograms for special groups (items 30-34) wasasked of telephone respondents.

(REV--9/8/98) 8/5/99 2:20 PM

UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET (UFDS)OCTOBER 1, 1998

DRUG AND ALCOHOL SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM (DASIS)

P T O A (Office Use Only)

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FORM APPROVED: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

OMB No: 0930-0106APPROVAL EXPIRES: 8/31/99

Is the information shown above complete and correct?

1 ~ Yes

2 ~ No L PLEASE CROSS OUT THE INCORRECT INFORMATIONAND ENTER THE CORRECT INFORMATION

PLEASE READ BEFORE TURNING THE PAGE!It is now possible for every facility to complete at least some portion of the questionnaire--even if anadministrative unit or parent facility has answered for you in the past. Begin at Q1 and follow the instructions.

Why is completing this questionnaire important?

Your participation makes a difference. The UFDS survey is the ONLY source ofdata on ALL known substance abuse treatment and prevention programs in thenation. When substance abuse policy makers and program managers need up-to-date national information on characteristics of substance abuse programs andthe numbers and types of clients served, they rely on the UFDS. UFDS data areused to formulate the Nation’s annual drug control strategy and to make manyother important decisions regarding substance abuse policy.

This survey is sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health ServicesAdministration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

I:\JimD files\UFDS Report\98Final Quest.wpd (REV--9/8/98) 8/5/99 2:20 PM

Instructions

C The reference date for UFDS is October 1, 1998.

C Return the completed questionnaire in the envelope provided.

If you have any questions concerning this questionnaire, or if you need additional blank forms, contact:

MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH, INC.

1-888-324-UFDS (8337)

Public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 50 minutes per response for treatment providers and 3 minutes per response for nontreatment providers(e.g., prevention and education), including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing andreviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducingthis burden, to SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer; Room 16-105, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, anda person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB number for this project is 0930-0106.

I:\JimD files\UFDS Report\98Final Quest.wpd 1 (REV--9/8/98) 8/5/99 2:20 PMI:\JimD files\UFDS Report\98Final Quest.wpd 1 (REV--9/8/98) 8/5/99 2:20 PMI:\JimD files\UFDS Report\98Final Quest.wpd 1 (REV--9/8/98) 8/5/99 2:20 PM

1. On October 1, 1998, which of the followingsubstance abuse services were provided bythis facility, that is, the facility named on thefront cover?

Please report for only this location

MARK “YES” OR “NO” FOR EACH YES NO

a. Substance Abuse Treatment(services that focus on initiatingand maintaining an individual’srecovery from substance abuseand on averting relapse) . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

b. Detoxification Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

c. Substance Abuse Prevention(prevention activities directed atindividuals not identified to be inneed of treatment, such asinformation dissemination oreducation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

d. Other Substance Abuse Services(such as intake, assessment, andreferral) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

e. Administrative Services(such as billing, personnel, andscheduling) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

1a. Did you answer “yes” to any of the servicesabove?

1 ~ Yes ö SKIP TO Q22 ~ No

1b. When did this facility stop providing substanceabuse services? RECORD MONTH AND YEAR

MONTH:

YEAR: 19SKIP TO Q38,

-1 ~ Don't know PAGE 10

0 ~ Never provided substanceabuse services

2. Who owns this facility?

MARK ONE ONLY1 ~ A private-for-profit organization2 ~ A private non-profit organization3 ~ State government SKIP TO4 ~ Local, county or community Q3

government5 ~ Tribal government6 ~ Federal government

2a. Which federal government agency?

MARK ONE ONLY

1 ~ Department of Veterans Affairs2 ~ Department of Defense3 ~ Bureau of Prisons4 ~ Indian Health Service5 ~ Other, (Specify:

_____________________________________)

3. Does this facility operate or participate in a hotlinethat provides substance abuse counseling andreferral services?

911 is not considered a hotline

1 ~ Yes2 ~ No ö SKIP TO Q4

3a. Please enter the facility’s hotline telephonenumber(s) below.

HOTLINE TELEPHONE NUMBER(S)

(_______)-____________________

(_______)-____________________

4. Did you check “yes” to either “Substance AbuseTreatment” or “Detoxification Services” in Q1?

1 ~ Yes2 ~ No ö SKIP TO Q38, PAGE 10

I:\JimD files\UFDS Report\98Final Quest.wpd 2 (REV--9/8/98) 8/5/99 3:44 PM

5. Which setting (or settings) BEST describe thissubstance abuse treatment facility?

C Please report for only the facility named on thefront cover

HOSPITAL SETTING (may include an outpatientsubstance abuse unit on site)

1 ~ General hospital

2 ~ Psychiatric hospital

3 ~ Other specialized hospital (for example,alcoholism, maternity, children’s, orthopedic)

SPECIALTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT SETTINGS

4 ~ OUTPATIENT facility specializing in substanceabuse treatment

5 ~ Halfway House

6 ~ RESIDENTIAL (non-hospital) substance abusetreatment facility

Does this residential facility include aTherapeutic Community (TC)? A TC is aspecific treatment approach used by someresidential facilities.

1 ~ Yes2 ~ No

OTHER SETTINGS

7 ~ Community MENTAL health center or othermental health facility that provides a varietyof services

8 ~ Community Health Center, including MigrantHealth Center, Urban Indian Program, HealthCare for the Homeless Center

9 ~ School (elementary, secondary, college/university)

10 ~ Community or religious organization/agencythat provides a variety of social services

11 ~ Jail, prison or juvenile detention center

12 ~ Other criminal justice (TASC, pretrial diversion,court referral, probation, parole, communitycorrections, drug courts)

13 ~ Private practice—Group

14 ~ Private practice—Solo

15 ~ Other setting (specify type:

)

6. Is this facility owned or operated by a managedcare organization (for example, an HMO)?

1 ~ Yes ö SKIP TO Q7, PAGE 3

2 ~ No

6a. On October 1, 1998, did this facility have lettersof agreement or contracts with managed careorganizations for providing substance abusetreatment services?

1 ~ Yes, had formal written agreements orcontracts with managed care organizations

2 ~ No formal written agreements orcontracts with managed careorganizations GO TO Q7,

PAGE 3

-1 ~ Don’t know

6b. With how many managed care organizations didyou have formal written agreements or contracts?

NUMBER:

7. As of October 1, 1998, which of these services were being provided at this substance abuse facility?

MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Assessment Services 1 ~ Comprehensive substance abuse

assessment/diagnosis 2 ~ Comprehensive mental health assessment/

diagnosis (for example, psychological/psychiatric evaluation and testing)

3 ~ Other (Specify: )

Therapy 4 ~ Family counseling 5 ~ Group therapy, not including relapse prevention 6 ~ Individual therapy 7 ~ Pharmacotherapies/prescription medication 8 ~ Relapse prevention groups 9 ~ Other (Specify: )

Testing (Include testing service even if specimen issent to outside source for chemical analysis)

10 ~ Blood alcohol testing (including breathalyzer)11 ~ Drug/alcohol urine screening12 ~ Hair analysis13 ~ Hepatitis testing14 ~ HIV testing15 ~ STD testing16 ~ TB screening17 ~ Other (Specify: )

Health Services18 ~ Family planning19 ~ Medical care (including physical exams)20 ~ Prenatal care21 ~ Perinatal care22 ~ TB treatment23 ~ Health education (for example, nutrition,

contagious diseases, STD other than HIV/AIDS)24 ~ HIV/AIDS education/counseling/support25 ~ Smoking cessation26 ~ Other (Specify: )

Continuing Care27 ~ Aftercare counseling28 ~ Alumni(ae) groups29 ~ Other (Specify: )

Special Programs for Target Populations30 ~ Adolescents31 ~ Dually-diagnosed (mental and substance

abuse disorders)32 ~ Persons with HIV/AIDS33 ~ Pregnant/Postpartum women61 ~ Other women’s groups34 ~ Other (Specify: )

Transitional Services35 ~ Assistance with obtaining Social Services

(i.e., Medicaid, WIC, SSI, SSDI)36 ~ Discharge planning37 ~ Employment counseling/training38 ~ Housing assistance39 ~ Referral to other services40 ~ Other (Specify: )

Community Outreach41 ~ Drug and alcohol education42 ~ Outreach/early intervention43 ~ Media presentations (T.V., radio, brochures)44 ~ Membership in a community partnership

program45 ~ Other (Specify: )

Other Services46 ~ Academic education/GED classes47 ~ Acupuncture48 ~ Case management services49 ~ Child care50 ~ Communication skills52 ~ Domestic violence--family/partner violence

services (physical, sexual and emotional abuse)53 ~ Home visits54 ~ Life skills for independent living55 ~ Outcome follow-up (post-discharge)56 ~ Parenting/family skills development57 ~ Self-help groups, including 12-step programs58 ~ Socialization/recreational services (for example,

scheduled activities such as camping, sportingevents)

59 ~ Transportation assistance to treatment60 ~ Other (Specify: )


,

,

8. On October 1, 1998, which of the following typesof substance abuse treatment were offered at thisfacility?

MARK “YES” OR “NO” FOR EACH YES NO

a. Outpatient detoxification . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

b. Intensive outpatient treatment . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

c. Outpatient treatment . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

d. Hospital Inpatient detoxification. . . 1 ~ 2 ~

e. Hospital Inpatient rehabilitation . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

f. Non-hospital residential (24 hour care) detoxification . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

g. Non-hospital residential(24 hour care) rehabilitation . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~

9. On October 1, 1998, was this facility part of anetwork of administratively-linked facilities thatprovide substance abuse treatment?

1 ~ Yes

2 ~ No ö SKIP TO Q12

10. The next questions ask about the number of clientstreated at this facility on October 1, 1998. Whichstatement below best describes your ability toprovide client count data for the facility named onthe front cover?

MARK ONE ONLY

1 ~ Can only provide client countsthat combine this facility with others ö GO TOQ11

2 ~ Can provide separate client countsfor this facility ö SKIP TO Q12

3 ~ Cannot provide any client counts for this facility; clients counts are onlyavailable from another facility in the network ö RECORD NAME AND PHONE

NUMBER OF PERSON TOCONTACT FOR CLIENT COUNTS

Name:

SKIP TOPhone: Q38, PAGE 10

11. How many facilities are included in the client datayou will be reporting?

NUMBER OF FACILITIES:

PLEASE MARK THE FACILITIES COUNTED IN Q11 ON THEYELLOW NETWORK FACILITY SHEET INCLUDED IN YOURQUESTIONNAIRE PACKET. THEN RETURN TO Q12 ANDANSWER THE REST OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THAT GROUPOF FACILITIES.

IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE THE YELLOW NETWORK FACILITYSHEET, CALL THE UFDS HOTLINE AT 1-888-324-UFDS(8337). ONE WILL BE FAXED TO YOU IMMEDIATELY. UPONRECEIPT OF THE FORM, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE.

12. 12 Month Unduplicated Client Count12 Month Unduplicated Client Count. In the12 months between October 1, 1997 andSeptember 30, 1998, (or the most recent 12-monthperiod for which data are available), how manyindividual clients received substance abusetreatment at this facility?

C Count all clients who received any treatment duringthe 12-month period, even if their treatment beganbefore that time

C Count each client only once

NUMBER:

13. 12 Month Admissions12 Month Admissions. During the 12 monthsbetween October 1, 1997 and September 30, 1998(or the most recent 12-month period for whichdata are available), how many admissions forsubstance abuse treatment were there at thisfacility?

C If a client was admitted more than once during this12-month period, count each time that person wasadmitted. For example, if the same person wasadmitted three times during the year, count this asthree admissions

C Moving to a different level of care also counts as anadmission

NUMBER:


,

,

,

,

,

,

,,,,

,,,,,,,,

,

,,,,,,,,

14. Were outpatient substance abuse treatmentservices offered on October 1, 1998? (See Q8,PAGE 4)

1 ~ Yes ö GO TO Q15 BELOW

2 ~ No ö SKIP TO Q18, PAGE 6

15. In the 30 days between September 1 and October 1,1998, how many people at this facility received thefollowing outpatient substance abuse treatmentservices . . .

C Only count those still enrolled on October 1, 1998

C For each category with no clients, enter zero, “0"

NUMBER

a. Outpatient detoxification . .

b. Intensive outpatient care (Includepersons who received servicesfor 2 or more hours per dayand 3 or more days perweek) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. Other outpatient care (excluding intensive) . . . . .

d. TOTAL OUTPATIENTS(add a, b, & c)

(Q15d)

(IF Q15d EQUALS ZERO: SKIP TO Q18, PAGE 6)

16. On October 1, 1998, how many of the TOTALOUTPATIENTS reported in Q15d were receivingmethadone or LAAM at this location?

~ THIS FACILITY DOES NOT DISPENSE METHADONE ORLAAM ! GO TO Q17

NUMBER

Methadone clients atthis location . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LAAM clients at thislocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17. How many of the total outpatients in Q15d were ineach of the following gender, race/ethnic, and agecategories?


17a. GENDERa. Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b. Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL OUTPATIENTS (add a-c) . .[Should equal the number in Q15d, if not please reconcile.]

17b. RACE/ETHNICITYa. White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b. Black or African American . . . . . .

c. Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

d. Asian or Pacific Islander . . . . . . . .

e. American Indian or Alaska Native.

f. Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL OUTPATIENTS (add a-g) . .[Should equal the number in Q15d, if not please reconcile.]

17c. AGEa. Under 18 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b. 18-20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. 21-24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

d. 25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

e. 35-44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

f. 45-64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g. 65 and over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

h. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL OUTPATIENTS (add a-h) . .[Should equal the number in Q15d, if not please reconcile.]


,

,

,

,

,

,

,,,,

,,,,,,,,

,

,,,,,,,,

18. Were hospital inpatient substance abusetreatment services offered on October 1, 1998? (See Q8, PAGE 4)



19. On October 1, 1998, how many beds weredesignated for hospital inpatient substanceabuse treatment clients? This is often referredto as “maximum capacity.”

C Include both occupied beds and unoccupied beds

MAXIMUM CAPACITY:

20. On October 1, 1998, how many clients at thisfacility received the following hospital inpatientsubstance abuse treatment services . . .

C Do not count those discharged on October 1, 1998


NUMBERa. Hospital inpatient--

detoxification. . . . . . . . . . .

b. Hospital inpatient--rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . .

c. TOTAL INPATIENTS(add a & b)

(Q20c)

(IF Q20c EQUALS ZERO: SKIP TO Q23, PAGE 7)

21. On October 1, 1998, how many of the TOTALINPATIENTS reported in Q20c were receivingmethadone or LAAM at this location?

~ THIS FACILITY DOES NOT DISPENSE METHADONEOR LAAM ! GO TO Q22

NUMBER



22. How many of the total hospital inpatients in Q20cwere in each of the following gender, race/ethnic,and age categories?


22a. GENDERa. Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b. Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL INPATIENTS (add a-c) . . . .[Should equal the number in Q20c, if not please reconcile.]



c. Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


e. American Indian or Alaska Native. .

f. Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL INPATIENTS (add a-g) . . . .[Should equal the number in Q20c, if not please reconcile.]


b. 18-20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. 21-24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

d. 25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

e. 35-44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

f. 45-64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g. 65 and over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

h. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TOTAL INPATIENTS (add a-h) . . . .[Should equal the number in Q20c, if not please reconcile.]


,

,

,

,

,

,

,,,,

,,,,,,,

,

,,,,,,,,,


23. Were non-hospital residential substance abusetreatment services offered on October 1, 1998? (See Q8, PAGE 4)



24. On October 1, 1998, how many beds weredesignated for non-hospital residential substanceabuse treatment clients? This is often referredto as “maximum capacity.”

C Include both occupied beds and unoccupied beds

MAXIMUM CAPACITY:

25. On October 1, 1998, how many clients at this facility received the following non-hospitalresidential (24-hour care) substance abusetreatment services . . .

C Only count those not discharged on October 1,1998


NUMBERa. Residential (24 hr)--

detoxification. . . . . . . . . . .

b. Residential (24 hr)--rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . .

c. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL(add a & b) . . . . . . . . . . .

(Q25c)

(IF Q25c EQUALS ZERO: SKIP TO Q28, PAGE 8 )

26. On October 1, 1998, how many of the TOTALRESIDENTIAL clients reported in Q25c werereceiving methadone or LAAM at this location?

~ THIS FACILITY DOES NOT DISPENSE METHADONEOR LAAM ! GO TO Q27

NUMBER



27. How many of the total residential clients in Q25cwere in each of the following gender, race/ethnic,and age categories?


27a. GENDERa. Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b. Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CLIENTS(add a-c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[Should equal the number in Q25c, if not please reconcile.]



c. Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


e. American Indian or Alaska Native. .

f. Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CLIENTS(add a-g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



b. 18-20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

c. 21-24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

d. 25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

e. 35-44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

f. 45-64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g. 65 and over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

h. Don’t know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CLIENTS(add a-h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


**BASE THIS PERCENTAGE ON ALL CLIENTS, NOT ONLY THE FEMALE CLIENTS

28. Approximately what percent of all the substance abuse treatment clients enrolled at this facility on October 1,1998 were being treated for:

~ THIS FACILITY HAD NO SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CLIENTS ON OCTOBER 1, 1998: SKIP TO Q30, PAGE 9

C Include all substance abuse clients reported at Q15d (outpatients), Q20c (hospital inpatients), and Q25c(non-hospital residential)

C Your response should add to 100 percent

a. Both Alcohol and Drug Abuse . . . . . . . . . . . . .00%

b. Alcohol Abuse Only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .00%

c. Drug Abuse Only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .00%

100%

29. Approximately what percent of all the substance abuse treatment clients enrolled at this facility on October 1,1998, were in the following categories:

C Include all substance abuse clients reported at Q15d (outpatients), Q20c (hospital inpatients), and Q25c(non-hospital residential)

C Clients can be counted in more than one categoryDon’t

Percent Or Know

a. Injection drug users at the time of admission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % ~

b. Known to have an active case of Tuberculosis (TB) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % ~

c. HIV positive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. % ~

d. Had previously received substance abuse treatment from this or another facility . . . % ~

e. Covered by managed care arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % ~

f. Criminal justice referred clients (excluding DUI/DWI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % ~

g. Pregnant women** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. % ~

h. Mothers with dependent children under 18 years old ** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % ~


$ .00

** Unspecified: Only use if you are unable to distinguish between revenue from managedcare and non-managed care sources. DO NOT DOUBLE COUNT REVENUE.

*Should Equal Q30 Revenue or Funding Amount

30. What was this facility’s total substance abuse treatment revenue or funding for the MOST RECENT 12-monthfiscal reporting period for which data are available? Include all sources such as client payments, insurance, government funds, and donations.C If substance abuse treatment revenue is combined with other revenue, please provide your best estimate of the

substance abuse treatment portion

Total Substance Abuse Treatment Revenue or Funding:

31. From which of the following sources did this facility receive the substance abuse treatment revenue or fundingreported above? Mark Yes or No for each.C Even if you cannot provide a revenue or funding total in Q30, please mark the sources and estimate percentages belowC If you marked category “6” (Federal government) in Q2, you should have revenues to report in category “e1” belowC FOR EACH SOURCE MARKED “YES”: Enter the dollar amount or estimated percentage of substance abuse treatment

revenue or funding received directly from that source

MARKYES OR NOFOR EACH

REVENUE SOURCES Yes NoDOLLARAMOUNT OR

ESTIMATEDPERCENT

a. Client payments (self-payment, deductibles, copayments) . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

b. Private health insurance1. Fee-for-service (not HMO, PPO, or managed care) . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

2. HMO/PPO/Managed care payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

3. Private health insurance, unspecified** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

c. Medicaid1. Not managed care--Title XIX, including all Federal,

State, and local matching Medicaid funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

2. Managed care payments--Title XIX, including allFederal, State, and local matching Medicaid funds . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

3. Medicaid, unspecified** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

d. Medicare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

e. Government funds1. Federal (for example, VA, CHAMPUS--not

including Medicare) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

2. State--including Federal block grant funds funneled throughthe State and any State-only medical assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

3. Local--not including Medicaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

f. Other public funds, source unspecified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

g. Other funds (such as funds from charities, donations, fund-raising events) - (specify largest source: _________________) . . . . . 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

h. Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 ~ 2 ~ $ %

TOTAL .00 * 100%


32. What 12-month reporting period was used toanswer Q30?

~ DID NOT ANSWER Q30 ! SKIP TO Q35

FROM: 19 Month Year

TO: 19 Month Year

33. Does Q30 report revenue or funding for only thisfacility or for this facility and others?

1 ~ Only this facility ! SKIP TO Q372 ~ This facility and others

34. Are the facilities you included in Q30 the samefacilities you included in your client counts (Q11)?

1 ~ All of the facilities are the same2 ~ Some of the facilities are the same SKIP TO-1 ~ Don’t know Q37

35. Is there another organization that can provide therevenue or funding information for your facility?

1 ~ Yes2 ~ No ö SKIP TO Q37

36. Please provide the following information for thatorganization.

Name of Organization

Name of Contact Person

Telephone (________) -

Ext. (if any)

37. In addition to funding received for providingsubstance abuse treatment services, did youreceive any Federal or State funding earmarked forprevention activities during the same 12-monthperiod reported in Q30 or your most recent fiscalyear?

1 ~ Yes

2 ~ No

-1 ~ Don’t Know

38. Please provide the following information about theperson primarily responsible for completing thisform.

Name:

Telephone Number: (_______) -

FAX Number: (________)-

OR ~ No FAX Number

Internet Address:

OR ~ No Internet Address

39. When completed, the 1998 National Directory ofDrug Abuse and Alcoholism Treatment andPrevention Programs and the 1998 UFDS DataReport will be available on SAMHSA’s home pageat www.samhsa.gov. If you would like to receive apaper copy of the National Directory or the UFDSData Report, please indicate below.

1 ~ Yes, I would like to receive a copy of the Directory

2 ~ Yes, I would like to receive a copy of the 1998UFDS Data Report

Thank you for your participation. Please return this questionnaire in the envelopeprovided. If you no longer have the envelope, please mail this questionnaire to:

MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH, INC.ATTN: Barbara Rogers

P.O. Box 2393Princeton, NJ 08543-2393

B.1

APPENDIX B

ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING

A consistent goal of UFDS has been to identifytreatment setting, a concept that is subject to avariety of definitions and interpretations.Definitions of treatment setting generally fall intothree categories. A treatment setting may be anorganizational setting (e.g., a hospital or mentalhealth center). It may indicate a treatmentphilosophy (e.g., social model or therapeuticcommunity). Finally, it may indicate livingarrangements while in treatment (e.g.,outpatient, residential, halfway house). Thesedifferent definitions are driven by the manydifferent needs of data users. For example,treatment setting may be used by payers to setrates, by treatment professionals to determinelevels of care, or by planners to determinesystem needs.

UFDS planners have tried to incorporate dataelements that permit analysis of treatment settingfrom different viewpoints. These data elementshave changed as the questionnaire has evolvedover time. In general, prior to 1995,organizational setting was collected in a singleenvironment/location/setting question. Treatmentphilosophy and client living arrangement werecollected in client census matrices, which cross-tabulated modality/type of care withenvironment/facility location. In 1995, the clientcensus matrices were simplified to reduce thereporting burden, and the environment/setting/location question was expanded to recaptureinformation lost from the matrices.

In the 1998 UFDS survey, treatment setting wascollected in a single question (Question 5; seeAppendix A). Respondents were asked to select

which setting or settings best described thefacility. Options included:

! General hospital! Psychiatric hospital! Other specialized hospital! Outpatient facility specializing in substance

abuse treatment! Halfway house! Residential (non-hospital) substance abuse

treatment facility! Therapeutic community! Community mental health center or other

mental health facility providing a variety ofservices

! Community health center! School! Community or religious organization/agency

providing a variety of social services! Jail, prison, or juvenile detention center! Other criminal justice! Private practice - solo! Private practice - group! Other setting

This multiple listing, in conjunction with thecounts of clients in treatment by type of care,was designed to permit flexibility in the definitionand analysis of treatment setting.

The definition of treatment setting used in thisreport corresponds to that of organizationalsetting. To present facility and client data byorganizational setting, it was necessary to assigneach facility to a single organizational settingcategory. The organizational settings categoriesused in the report are:

B.2

! Specialty substance abuse treatment! Outpatient! Residential (including halfway house,

therapeutic community)! Outpatient and residential

! Community mental health center/Othermental health facility

! Solo or group practice! General hospital (including VA hospitals)! Psychiatric or other specialized hospital! Criminal justice! Community or religious agency/organization! Community health center! Multiple or unknown settings

About two-thirds of the facilities selected asingle setting category. For those facilitiesselecting multiple responses to the settingquestion, assignment to a single organizationalsetting category was completed following analgorithm developed to place each facility into itsmost logical setting category. For multiple re-sponses, setting categories were determined

first on the basis of whether a largerorganizational affiliation was indicated. Thusfacilities indicating that they were set in acommunity mental health center, communityhealth center, solo or group practice, the criminaljustice system, or community or religiousagency/organization were categorized as such.Facilities not indicating such an affiliation wereclassified as Specialty substance abuse treatmentfacilities. These were further subdividedaccording to client living arrangement(outpatient, residential, or mixed outpatient andresidential).

Facilities indicating more than one largeraffiliation (such as both CMHC and communityhealth center) were classified as Mixed/Un-known. This category also included facilities thatindicated that they were schools, and those thatfailed to specify a setting.

Uniform Facility Data Set, 1998: [United States] -...

Documents

Transcript of Uniform Facility Data Set, 1998: [United States] -...