Understanding Factors that Influence Local Sales Tax Value
-
date post
19-Oct-2014 -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
359 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Understanding Factors that Influence Local Sales Tax Value
WHITNEY AFONSOSCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT
WINTER 2013NCLGBA
Feeling LOST? Understanding the factors that
influence local sales tax revenue
Whitney Afonso December 2013
North Carolina Compared to Georgia
Georgia: General LOST:
1% rate Levied by counties Shared with
municipalities Voted on to pass Required to reduce
property tax burden Earmarked LOST:
ELOST, HOST, MARTA, and SPLOST
Point of sale
North Carolina: General LOST:
Multiple articles Levied by counties Shared with
municipalities Voted on to pass Expected to increase own
source revenue Earmarked LOST:
One article (previously two) is partially earmarked for education capital
Distributed on a per capita basis
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Local Option Sales Taxes (LOSTs)
What do you care about when it comes to understanding LOSTs?
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Traditional LOST Considerations
In the academic literature most of the discussion revolves around: If the revenue is used to reduce property tax burdens
Why/when do governments adopt it
Tax Competition If your rate gets too high then you will lose business to
neighbors Less of an issue in NC
Counties that border other states Passing additional LOSTs for transportation
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Additional LOST Considerations
You all probably care less about those issues I am happy to answer those questions though if you
have them
So I want to know: What are your concerns?
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Who Generates the Most Revenue?
Research I am currently working on
I am looking at four inter-related topics: Do urban areas do better? Do your neighbors matter? Are tourism areas different? How does LOST revenue raising capacity interact with
property tax capacity?
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Urban Areas
Are urban areas actually better off?
Total dollars vs per capita
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Regional Effects
Whitney Afonso December 2013
So if you are…
Urban or “high” population: In terms of per capita revenue you do not do so well
Exceptions are Mecklenburg, Buncombe, and Forsyth True for suburban too
Rural with little tourism: Very low in terms of real dollars and per capita dollars
Tourism rich: Do very well in terms of real dollars and especially in
per capita terms
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Who is Paying?
Why do urban and tourism rich areas generate more money?
Residents versus Non-Residents Commuters Tourists
Which is more volatile? Tourists.
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Volatility
Sales taxes are more elastic than property taxes They grow more quickly with income They are also more adversely affected by negative
shocks
Understand what it means for your revenue Good times are great! Bad times are hard…
Plan ahead and save
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Revenue Raising Capacity
Relationships between primary revenue sources Property taxes and sales taxes
Want to know not just what revenue you collect, but what you could be collecting The idea of capacity
Whitney Afonso December 2013
How to Measure Revenue Raising Capacity
Revenue Raising Capacity=
Property tax base X Average millage rate+
Sales tax base X Average sales tax rate
Pattern of who generates the most is similar Rural still generates the least
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Revenue Raising Capacity by County
(732.4905,3570.058](531.6586,732.4905](453.6219,531.6586][326.1053,453.6219]
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Further Considerations
Sales taxes are often seen as extremely inequitable It appears they are
But not on the dimension previously discussed One caveat:
Tourism rich and urban areas have a lot of non-resident traffic
This means they are able to export a portion of the burden
However they also have large populations coming and using resources and services they do not pay traditional taxes
Whitney Afonso December 2013
County Distributions: NC & GA
Georgia: General LOST:
Distributed to munis by the discretion of the county
8 considerations in LOST distribution -> no formula
Different munis can receive dramatically different amounts arbitrarily
Earmarked LOST: Must be used for the
earmarked purpose
North Carolina: General LOST:
Distributed to municipalities by the discretion of the county
Per capita or ad valorem distributions
Constant for all munis in the county
Earmarked LOST: For the earmarked
revenue munis can treat it like a typical intergovernmental transfer
Whitney Afonso December 2013
County to Municipality Distributions
Per capita versus ad valorem PC: Total population in addition to population in municipalities AV: Total property tax levied in county and munis
So dependent on revenue, not necessarily capacity
Revenue Raising Capacity One way to frame this discussion is to look at county and
municipal RRC Not just which way would they receive the most LOST revenue Especially if different strategies benefit different munis within
the county Look at sales tax revenue distribution strategies instead of the
“base”
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Questions
Any questions about LOSTs and literature?
Any thoughts or considerations about LOST?
Any areas of LOSTs you would like to see explored?
Please feel free to contact me: [email protected]
Whitney Afonso December 2013
Brief Background on NC LOSTs
Local option sales taxes (LOSTs) in NC are composed of many “articles” or smaller LOSTs Rates vary between 2% and 2.25% with 3 counties having and
additional 0.5% for transit Base 2% taxes food unlike the state level sales tax
One article is partially earmarked for counties For education capital Revenue is distributed on a (weighted) per capita basis
This is a change! There used to be more distributed and earmarked like this
Municipalities are not constrainedState collects revenue and distributes it back to
counties and counties distribute to municipalities Per capita versus ad valorem basis
Whitney Afonso October 2013
Revenue Raising Capacity
Average Property Tax and LOST Revenue
LOSTProperty tax
revenue
Total Property
Value
In total dollars (000s)
Urban 14,700 291,709 44,000,000
Suburban 5,463 41,237 8,225,920
Rural 3,020 19,948 3,308,751Tourism rich 8,953 60,061 12,300,000
In per capita dollars
Urban 89.75 610 93,316
Suburban 89.53 633 143,451
Rural 64.54 465 79,799
Tourism rich 100.71 554 132,354The suburban and rural counties that have been re-coded as tourism are not
included in the suburban and rural averages. The totals are presented in thousands of dollars, the per capita terms are not.