Understanding Dust Explosions - the Role of Powder...
Transcript of Understanding Dust Explosions - the Role of Powder...
Understanding Dust Explosions -the Role of Powder Science and
TechnologyTechnology
Rolf K. EckhoffProfessor emeritus, University of Bergen,
Dept. of Physics and Technology, B NBergen, Norway.
Scientific/technical adviser,Scientific/technical adviser, Øresund Safety Advisers AB, Malmö, Sweden.
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
What is a dust explosionp
??? Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Controlled, vented wheat grain dust explosion experiment in a 500 m3 silo cell in Norway in 1980
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
p y
Destructive dustDestructive dust explosion experiment (maize starch) in a(maize starch) in a 500 m3 silo in Norway in 1982in 1982
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Objective of present paper
h h d d di f.. to show that adequate understanding of dust explosion phenomena in the processdust explosion phenomena in the process industries requires knowledge of central t i f d i d t h ltopics of powder science and technology
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Basic powder-technology-related topics that are essential for understanding
dust explosionsdust explosions
● Particle and powder characterization● Particle and powder characterization● Production of fine particles by crushing,
i di d b igrinding and abrasion● Powder mechanics (mechanical strength of ( g
powder deposits)● Particle segregation in powder bedsParticle segregation in powder beds● Dust cloud generation/powder
dispersion/powder fluidizationdispersion/powder fluidization
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Powder-technology-related properties of dust l d i fl i th i i iti iti itclouds influencing their ignition sensitivity
and burning rate (explosion violence)g ( p )
● Distribution of primary particle sizes in● Distribution of primary particle sizes in dust/powder
● Particle shape characteristics● Degree of agglomeration of dust particles, i.e. g gg p ,
real `particle' size distribution in dust cloud● Dust concentration distribution in cloud● Dust concentration distribution in cloud● Degree of turbulence of cloud.
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• In some special situations such as in air jet mills, explosive dust clouds areair jet mills, explosive dust clouds are generated in situ, i.e. the dust particles b d d i th i thbecome suspended in the air as they are producedp
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• In most cases, explosive dust clouds are generated by re-entrainment and re-dispersion of powders and dusts thatre-dispersion of powders and dusts that have been produced at an earlier stage and allowed to accumulate as layers or heapsheaps
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• Re suspension/re dispersion of• Re-suspension/re-dispersion of powder/dust occurs intentionally during pneumatic transport in pipes, by filling of silos and hoppers in fluidized beds insilos and hoppers, in fluidized beds, in spray dryers and other types of dryers, in mixers and blenders and in screening machinerymachinery
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• Unintentional re-dispersion may be due p yto uncontrolled flow (“flooding”) in funnel-flow silos and hoppers bursting of sacksflow silos and hoppers, bursting of sacks and bags containing powder, or by sudden blasts of air generated by primary dust explosions elsewhere in the plantexplosions elsewhere in the plant
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Factors influencing the ignitability andFactors influencing the ignitability and explosibility of dust clouds in air (I)
• Chemical composition of the dust including its• Chemical composition of the dust, including its moisture content
• Distributions of particle sizes and shapes in theDistributions of particle sizes and shapes in the dust, determining the specific surface area of the dust in the fully dispersed statedust in the fully dispersed state
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
M t i l th t i d t l iMaterials that can give dust explosions
• Natural organic materials (grain, wood, linen, sugar etc )sugar, etc.)
• Synthetic organic materials (plastics, organic pigments, pesticides, pharmaceuticals etc.).
• Coal and peatCoal and peat• Metals (aluminium, magnesium, titanium, zinc,
i t )iron, etc.)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Heats of combustion (oxidation) of various substances per mole O2 consumed
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
p 2
I fl f ifi f f l i i d fInfluence of specific surface area of aluminium powder of maximum rate of rise of explosion pressure during dust explosions in air in a standard 1 m3 closed bomb. From Bartknecht (1978)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Influence of mean particle diameteron minimum explosive dust concentration for three different dusts in the 20-litres USBM l dUSBM closed explosion bomb. F H t b dFrom Hertzberg and Cashdollar (1987)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Minimum electric sparkMinimum electric spark ignition energy (MIE) of clouds in air of three different powders, as functions of particle size From Bartknechtsize. From Bartknecht (1987)
Theoretical line for poly-ethylene from Kalkert and ScheckerKalkert and Schecker (1979)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
I fl fInfluence ofchemistry(starch or protein) andprotein) andspecific surface area of natural organicorganic materials on maximum rate of pressure rise inpressure rise in closed 1.2 liter Hartmann bomb.
From Eckhoff (1977/1978)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Influence of chlorine in dust material molecule on maximum explosionexplosion pressure and maximum rate ofmaximum rate of pressure rise in 1 m3 standard ISO vessel, for various particle sizes.
From Bartknecht (1978)(1978)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Factors influencing the ignitability and explosibility of dust clouds in air (II)explosibility of dust clouds in air (II)
• Degree of dispersion (or agglomeration) of dust particles i e the effective specific surfacedust particles, i.e. the effective specific surface area available to the combustion process in the d t l d i th t l i d t i l it tidust cloud in the actual industrial situation
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Illustration of a perfectly dispersed dust cloud consisting of primary particles only, and a cloud consisting of agglomerates. From Eckhoff (2003)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• One can define a theoretical dispersibility Dmax of a particular material as the mass that could ideally be dispersed into primary particles per unit of work, W, performed:
Dmax = 1/Wminmax min
• But no realistic dispersion process can be one• But no realistic dispersion process can be one-hundred per cent efficient. This may be accounted for by incorporating an efficiency factor K:for by incorporating an efficiency factor, K:
Dreal = K/ Wmin , 0 < K < 1
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Inter-particle forces in powders include:● van der Waals' forces● Electrostatic forces● Electrostatic forces ● Forces due to liquid bridges and q g
capillary under-pressure
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• In the dispersion of cohesive powderscomposed of very small particles (<5-10 µm) inter-particle forces play a major roleµm), inter particle forces play a major role, and inter-particle bonds cannot be broken
l h i l lunless the particle agglomerates are exposed to very large shear forces.exposed to very large shear forces.
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
• This means that complete dispersion into i ti l i l ibl i hi hprimary particles is only possible in high-
velocity flow fields, or if the particles are y , pexposed to high-velocity impacts
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Cross section of nozzle for dispersing p gagglomerates of cohesive dust particles. From Yamamoto and Suganuma (1984)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Effective particle sizeEffective particle size distributions of an airborne talc dust after dispersal at different flow velocities through gorifices. Rw is the percentage by weight of the effective ‘particles’ that are larger than the size x. From Yamamoto and Suganuma (1984)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Max rates of pressure rise versus dust concentration in dust explosions in aMax. rates of pressure rise versus dust concentration in dust explosions in a 1.2-litre closed bomb with clouds in air of maize starch containing different
fractions of agglomerates. Eckhoff and Mathisen (1977/1978) Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Factors influencing the ignitability and explosibility of dust clouds in air (III)
• Dust concentration
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Range of explosive dust concentrations for maize starch, compared with g p , ptypical range of concentrations relevant to industrial hygiene, and with a
typical density of dust deposits/layers. From Eckhoff (2003)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Influence of dust concentration on explosion rate and ignition sensitivity of dust cloud
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
g y
Influence of average dust concentration in a maize starch explosion in an experimental silo cell of volume 236 m3 height 22 m andin an experimental silo cell of volume 236 m3, height 22 m and
length-to-diameter 6, on the maximum explosion pressure generated in the silo. 5.7 m2 vent opening in silo roof. Ignition close to silo
bottom From Eckhoff (2003) Øresund Safety Advisers AB
bottom. From Eckhoff (2003)
Influence of averageInfluence of average dust concentration on the minimum electricthe minimum electric spark ignition energy (MIE) of clouds of an ( )anti oxidant in air, in the standard 1 m3 closed vessel. From Bartknecht (1979)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Factors influencing the ignitability andFactors influencing the ignitability and explosibility of dust clouds in air (IV)
Di t ib ti f i iti l t b l i th t l• Distribution of initial turbulence in the actual cloud
• Possibility of generation of explosion induced• Possibility of generation of explosion-induced turbulence in the still unburnt part of the cloud ( f )(location of ignition source important parameter)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Influence of initial turbulence on minimumturbulence on minimum electric spark ignition energy (MIE) of a dustenergy (MIE) of a dust cloud. Experiments with various dusts in a 20-litres closed explosion bomb. From pGlarner (1984)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Influence of initial turbulence on explosion rate of a dust cloud. Experiments with 420 g/m3 of lycopodium in air in a 1.2-litre closed explosion bomb. Bars: ±1
std dev From Eckhoff (1977) Øresund Safety Advisers AB
std. dev. From Eckhoff (1977)
Time of arrival of bituminous coal dust/air flame as aTime of arrival of bituminous coal dust/air flame as a function of distance from ignition point at closed end of gallery of length 260 m and diameter 3.2 m. Pressure at closed end as a function of time. Nominal average dust concentration 500 g/m3 (From Fischer, 1957)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
The role of powder science andThe role of powder science and technology in dust explosion
prevention and control in practice
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Inherently safe process designInherently safe process design
• Avoidance of undesired particle segregationAvoidance of undesired particle segregation
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
S ti h iSome segregation mechanisms
• Percolation of small particles through a bed f l b ib tiof larger ones by e.g. vibration
• Air current segregationAir current segregation• Segregation due to differences in density,
shape shape and surface properties of particlesparticles
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Illustration of migration of a fraction of small particlesIllustration of migration of a fraction of small particles through a bed of larger particles (percolation). From
Eckhoff (1976a) Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Eckhoff (1976a)
I h tl f d iInherently safe process design
Example:• Application of powder mechanics to silo design
to avoid undesired segregation and dust cloudto avoid undesired segregation and dust cloud formation
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Ill t ti fIllustration of uncontrolled flow, with “flooding” ofwith “flooding”, of bulk material in funnel flow causingfunnel flow causing generation of explosive dustexplosive dust clouds
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Illustration of generation of gsmouldering nests in stagnant zones in funnel flow silos
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Smooth controlled flow and re-mixing of segregated bulk material in mass flow il d i di hsilo during discharge
of stored bulk t i lmaterial
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Casting of MgFeSi alloysCasting of MgFeSi alloysOld casting method:O d cast g et od• Large solidification flakes
Substantial segregation of Mg during solidification• Substantial segregation of Mg during solidification• Material with high Mg content most brittle and
created most fine dustTherefore:• More very fine dust then necessary was produced• More Mg in fine dust than average content• More Mg in fine dust than average content• Because MIE decreases with decreasing particle size
d i i M h fi d fand increasing Mg content, too much fine dust of very low MIE was generated
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
C ti f M F Si llCasting of MgFeSi alloys
New casting method:• Small solidification flakes • Minimal segregation i e less fine dust andMinimal segregation, i.e. less fine dust and
less Mg in finest dustTh fTherefore:• A better main productA better main product• Considerably reduced dust explosion
h dhazard
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
EXPLOSION PREVENTION
PREVENTING PREVENTING
EXPLOSION MITIGATION
EXPLOSIVE DUST CLOUDS
IGNITION SOURCES
Process design to prevent undesired
Smouldering combustion in dust,
Explosion-pressure resistant constructionp
generation of dust clouds and particle size segregation (“Inherent safety”)
dust fires
( y ) Intrinsic inerting of dust cloud by
Other types of open flames (e.g. hot
Explosion isolation (sectioning)y
combustion gases ( g
work) ( g)
Inerting of dust cloud by adding inert
Hot surfaces (electrically or
Explosion venting
y gdust
( ymechanically heated)
Keeping dust conc. outside explosive
Heat from mechanical impact
Automatic explosion suppressionp
range p
(metal sparks and hot-spots)
pp
Inerting of dust clouds by N2, CO2
Electric sparks and
Partial inerting of dust cloud y
and rare gases
parcs and electrostatic discharges
gby inert gas
Good housekeeping (dust removal/cleaning)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
g)
Preventing explosive dust clouds
I i f d l d b ddi i d• Inerting of dust cloud by adding inert dust(mixing/segregation dispersion)(mixing/segregation, dispersion)
• Keeping dust conc. outside explosive range
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion mitigationExplosion mitigation
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion isolation (sectioning)
i.e. closure of connections between process unitsi.e. closure of connections between process units in time to prevent passage of propagating dust flame. Depends on flame propagation speed,flame. Depends on flame propagation speed, which in turn, for a given chemistry, depends on
- particle size- particle size- degree of dust dispersion - dust concentration - dust cloud turbulencedust cloud turbulence
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion isolationExplosion isolationIllustration of an explosion isolation system at a transfer point between two horizontal conveyors, based on strong reinforcedbased on strong reinforced concrete walls and an explosion proof rotary lock that is interlocked with pressure sensors detecting any abnormal pressure rise on either sideeither side.
From Bühler, Switzerland
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion ventingp g
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion venting
The maximum explosion pressure in a vented fdust explosion, Pred, is a result of two
competing processes, viz.:● Burning of the dust cloud within the enclosure which produces heat and henceenclosure, which produces heat and hence increases the pressure● Flow of unburnt burning and burnt dust cloud● Flow of unburnt, burning and burnt dust cloud out of the enclosure through the vent, which relieves the pressurerelieves the pressure
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
T pical ent panel that opens in a controlled aTypical vent panel that opens in a controlled way at a specified internal over-pressure
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion ventingExplosion venting
Influence of initial dust cloud turbulence on maximum pressure inInfluence of initial dust cloud turbulence on maximum pressure in vented maize starch explosions in a 64 m3 chamber. Dust
concentration 250 g/m3. Vent size 5.6 m2. From Tamanini (1989) Øresund Safety Advisers AB
g ( )
Explosion venting
R lt f t dResults from vented maize starch and wheat grain dust explosions in g pa 500 m3 silo cell. Comparison with P / tPred/vent area correlations used in various countries.
From Eckhoff (2003)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion ventingExplosion venting
Results from vented i t h l i imaize starch explosions in
a 20 m3 silo cell, demonstration the markeddemonstration the marked influence of the mode of dust cloud generation on th i l ithe maximum explosion pressure Pred in the vented silo.vented silo.
From Eckhoff (2003)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion venting
Influence of locationInfluence of location of the ignition point in a 236 m3 slim silo cell on the maximum explosion pressure P in the ventedPred in the vented silo. From Eckhoff (1990)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Fig 113Explosion venting:
Fig 113p gQuenching tube
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Fig 114E l i ti Fig 114Explosion venting: Quenching-tubeQuenching tube
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion venting:p gQuenching tube
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion suppressionExplosion suppression
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Fig 118Fig 118
Explosion pressure sensor for suppression systems Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Fig 119Fig 119
Explosion suppression system Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Fig 120Fig 120
L (45 l)Large (45 l)explosionexplosionsuppressorfor powder
tsuppressant
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion suppression
● Extinguishing agent permanently● Extinguishing agent permanently pressurized
● Large-diameter discharge orificeV f t i f l f i di t● Very fast opening of valve for immediate release of extinguishing agent by meansrelease of extinguishing agent by means of an explosive charge
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion suppression
Illustration of the mass of suppressant required and delivered as functions of time, for obtaining reliable, critical and failed suppression. From Moore (1987)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Explosion suppressionExplosion suppression
Illustration of how failed suppression can result ppfrom too late of suppressant injection, too low
injection rate and too small quantity ofinjection rate, and too small quantity of suppressant injected. From Moore (1987)
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Secondary dust explosionsSecondary dust explosions
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
How thick does a dust layer have toHow thick does a dust layer have to be to produce hazardous volumesbe to produce hazardous volumes
of explosive dust cloudp
?? Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Potential dust explosion hazard of even very thin layers of combustible dustvery thin layers of combustible dust
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
We must understand:We must understand:
• Entrainment of dust particles from layers b air flo sby air flows
• Movement of dust particles suspended inMovement of dust particles suspended in air flows
Øresund Safety Advisers AB
Concluding statement
Hopefully this lecture has contributedHopefully this lecture has contributed to the appreciation of knowledge of
powder science and technology as an essential premise for a genuinean essential premise for a genuine understanding of dust explosionsg p
Øresund Safety Advisers AB