Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

16
Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms E-campaigning Forum, Oxford 21-22 March 2012 Anastasia Kavada University of Westminster

description

Knowledge Exchange presentation by Anastasia Kavada at the 2012 eCampaigning Forum in Oxford.

Transcript of Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Page 1: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms

E-campaigning Forum, Oxford 21-22 March 2012

Anastasia Kavada

University of Westminster

Page 2: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Social Media & Engagement Access to new audiences

Lowers costs of mobilization - information can spread through pre-existing social networks

Capacity for interaction and co-production of content carry the potential for community-building

Page 3: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Some Problems Loss of control over the message

Presence on multiple platforms: Dispersion of the supporter base Lack of message coherence Duplication and potential waste of resources

Limited commitment - Transient sense of belonging Weak participation - ‘clicktivism’ &‘slacktivism’ Promote individuality rather than collective unity

Page 4: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Studying civic engagement Practitioners:

‘Ladder of engagement’ or ‘supporter journey’

Academic research: Threshold of participation, rational choice theory

But… Underlying assumption: A smooth progression up the

ladder of engagement?

Focus on the individual and not on how the individual is engaged in the collective

Page 5: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Studying civic engagement

Mapping of Collective ActionBimber, Flanagin & Stohl (2005), (2006)

Page 6: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Mapping of Collective Action

Mode of Engagement

Entrepreneurial: high responsibility & opportunity

Institutional: low responsibility & opportunity

Mode of Interaction [Bonding]

Personal: direct Interaction

Impersonal: no direct interaction

(Flanagin et al., 2006, p. 34)

Page 7: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Studying Social Media Platforms

Move from web 1.0 to 2.0 means that we need to study websites not as top-down communication from advocacy groups to users but as platforms of interaction between a variety of actors (web coordinators, lay users, platform creators etc.)

So we need to pay attention to: classes or types of users roles and rules, governance norms and policy documents modes of interaction and co-production of content

Page 8: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Methods

Case studies:

Main Facebook and Twitter page of 38 Degrees and Amnesty International UK

Methods:

Features analysis (focus on the design and architecture)

Content analysis of comments (focus on the use)

Interviews (focus on the use)

Page 9: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Mode of Engagement

Activities

Affiliating

Framing

Mobilizing

Taking Action

Managing the space

Ranges from institutional to entrepreneurial

Added: presence of the individual voice in the collective

Page 10: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Mode of interaction (or bonding)

Ranges from personal (leads to direct ties) to impersonal (leads to affiliative ties)

Added: who can communicate with whom degree of interactivity (two-way communication) degree of synchronicity degree of privacy

Page 11: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Mode of Engagement

Greater individual autonomy in affiliating to the organization

Framing of issues, narrative of campaigns and agenda-setting is controlled by the organization Design of Facebook pages and Twitter profiles helps to

distinguish between organizational and individual voices

Individuals play a somewhat greater role in curating/arranging information on the platform

Mobilizing: Greater individual autonomy in using one’s social network to spread the word

Page 12: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Mode of Interaction [Bonding]

Individual supporters & organization mainly public and impersonal communication some interaction on discussion pages, wall posts and

@replies

Supporters & their own social networksMore opportunities for synchronous, interactive and private communication

Supporters & Supporters mainly public opportunity for interaction on discussion pages and

Facebook wall – but content analysis shows that this is limited

Page 13: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Mode of Interaction [Bonding]

Interpersonal bonding with one’s own network but affiliative ties with other supporters

Page 14: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Moving forward

Mode of Engagement

Entrepreneurial

Institutional

Mode of Interaction [Bonding]

Personal ImpersonalFB T

W

LG

Understand social media as embedded in the broader

communication ecology of the organization

Page 15: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Moving forward

Mode of Engagement

Entrepreneurial

Institutional

Mode of Interaction [Bonding]

Personal ImpersonalFB T

W

LG

Study the links, flows, and overlaps between different

communication spaces

Page 16: Understanding civic engagement on social media platforms - Anastasia Kavada

Thank You!

Please send questions and feedback to

[email protected]