UNCLASSIFIED llmmiIm~ - apps.dtic.mil
Transcript of UNCLASSIFIED llmmiIm~ - apps.dtic.mil
-A199 487 INVESTIGATION AND SYNTHESIS OF wiGN4 TEMPERATURE AD 1/1INCREASED STIFFNESS R (U) NORTI4&ESTERN UNIV EVANSTONIL DEPT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE ANDEE M E FINE ET AI
UNCLASSIFIED SEP 87 AFOSR-85-8337 F/G it/6. ULNSflfflfflffllflfIlllI llmmiIm~
Ii111 11.6-1.8
iii 1.V. Iu. 36
lull I _ I Il '- 140 I, .____ 1112.*11111.2 -4 11111_L.8
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART
M-,
6
Sj 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 .
F NAIFIED
e" - I .. ,Y .' i IF ,, - ,t 7 W T 7
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE k
a Rt , ;Giu lb RESTRICTIVE MARKjNGS lc IEU 0.. .... ... ' !:FILE COP"2a StCuR, 3 DISTRIBUTION, AVAILABILITY OF REPORT
This document has been approved for public re-
_EC "" "u-A 190 407 lease and sale; its distribution is unlimited
4 PERFOR.. S MONITOd GA.I.TION4 T E1 RT0jN N8
6a NAME OF PER ORMING ORGANIZATION 6o OFFICE SYMBOL 7a NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION
Northwestern Universitv (if applicable) Air Force Office of Scientific Research
6C. ADDRESS (Ciry. State, and ZIPCode) 7b ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code)
Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering Bolling AFB, Building 410Evanston, IL 60208 Washington, DC 20332
a NA'.IE 0 :Oi, '%D!Nt SPONSCR.,%G 8t OFFiCE SYMBOL 9 OROCUREMENT ,NSTRuMENT iDENTiFCATiON NUMBERORGANiZA" ON (if applcable)
AFOSR I NE AFOSR-85-0337A
3c ADDRESS (Cry, State. and Z!PCode) 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS
Bl PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNITBolling AFB, Building 410 ELEMENT NO NO NO ACCESSION NO
Washington, DC 20332 61102F 2306 Al
11 TiTLE (Include Security Classification)
Investigation and Synthesis of High Temperature and Increased Stiffness RSP Aluminum
Alloys
12 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)Morris E. Fine and Julia R. Weertman
13a TYPE OF REPORT 13b TIME COVERED 114 DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 15 PAGE COUNTAnnual Technical IROM 10/1/86 TO9/30/87 Oia.k 31, 1987 1j'r 19
16 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION
17 COSATI CODES 18 SUBjECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)FIELD GROUP SUB-GROUP "
Aluminum, high temperature alloys, aluminum-zirconium-
vanadium, aluminum spinel
19 ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number)The objective of this research is to investigate two promising systems as the basis for high
temperature aluminum alloys useful to 425q (8009-f). The first is a metal matrix compositeconsisting of an aluminum-magnesium alloy matrix reinforced by spinel (magnesium aluminate)
particulate. The second system is tri-aluminum (zirconium, vanadium) dispersed in aluminum
matrix. Here the lattice parameter matches that of the matrix. Research on dilute alloys has
shown a low coarsening rate for this intermetallic at 425'-C. Study of more concentratedalloys is underway. A mechanical alloying-liquid metal infiltration procedure for preparing
N specimens of the aluminum alloy matrixspinel composite has been worked out and specimens with
4 vol.% spinel have been prepared. Also, 4 vol.% alumina composite samples were prepared forcomparison. Spinel particles were within the aluminum alloy grains in contrast to the alumina
which was at grain boundaries. The spinel composite had much better creep resistance at 4100 C
Extrusions containing 5 vol.% tri-aluminum (0.75 vanadium, 0.25 zirconium) were prepared forthis research by Lockheed-Palo Alto from rapidly solidified foil. The measured creep rate at
425"C is much lower than in the current aluminum-iron-cerium alloy. An aluminum-vanadium
20 DISTRIBUTION ,AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21 ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION% CUNCLASSIFEDUNLIMITEO C3 SAME AS RPT C3 OTIC USERS K . "
22tNAMIOF RjSPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 2eb TELEPHONE flnclude AreaCode) 22c OFFICE SYMBOLr. an . Rosenstein (202)767-4933 NE
DD FORM 1473, 84 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhausted SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEAll other editions are obsolete. UNCLASSIFIED
4,%
- NrN 05p!
DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
THE TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
EVANSTON, IL 60201
Annual Technical Report on
Investigation and Synthesis of High Temperature andIncreased Stiffness RSP Aluminum Alloys
to
Electronic and Solid State Sciences Division
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Department of the Air Force
Bolling Air Force Base
Washington, D. C. 20332
Attn: Dr. Alan H. Rosenstein
AF Grant No.: AFOSR-85-0337
For the Period
1 October 1986 to 30 September 1987
Principal Investigators:
For
Morris E. Fine, Walter P. Murphy Professor of Materials Science andul
Engineering
Julia R. Weertman, Professor of Materials Science and Engineering d
"* ~Dtribution/
October 21, 1986 AveilablItty Codes
- -- lAvnil and/orD t., I spclal
/ KpociNl
PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL
V
Professor Morris E. Fine, Principal Investigator
Professor Julia R. Weertman, Principal Investigator
Dr. Mahidhara K. Rao, Postdoctoral Research Associate,* 2/1/86 - 6/15/87
Mr. Yen Cheng (Dan) Chen, Ph.D. student, Graduate
Research Assistant, 10/1/85 - continuing
Mr. Terry S. Creasy, M.S. student, 10/1/85 - 7/31/87
de,.
. . -. - -i . J - . W F 7 fl W Y , r w , n nf .u r~ . • -
SUMMARY
The objective of this research is to investigate two promising systems
as the basis for high temperature aluminum alloys useful to 4250 C (8000 F).
The first is a metal matrix composite consisting of an aluminum-magnesium
alloy matrix reinforced by spinel (magnesium aluminate) particulate. The
second system is tri-aluminum (zirconium, vanadium) dispersed in aluminum
matrix. Here the lattice parameter matches that of the matrix. Research
on dilute alloys has shown a low coarsening rate for this intermetallic at
4250C. Study of more concentrated alloys is underway.
A mechanical alloying-liquid metal infiltration procedure for pre-
paring specimens of the aluminum alloy matrix-spinel composite has been
worked out and specimens with 4 vol.% spinel have been prepared. Also,
4 vol.% alumina composite samples were prepared for comparison. Spinel
particles were within the aluminum alloy grains in contrast to the alumina
which was at grain boundaries. The spinel composite had much better creep
resistance at 4100 C.
Extrusions containing 5 vol.% tri-aluminum (0.75 vanadium, 0.25 zir-
conium) were prepared for this research by Lockheed-Palo Alto from rapidly
solidified foil. The measured creep rate at 4250 C is much lower than in
the current aluminum-iron-cerium alloy. An aluminum-vanadium intermetallic
compound, however, forms at grain boundaries leading to a precipitate free
zone which grows slowly at 425°C.
2
%p ~ ~p4
STATEMENT OF WORK
By analogy with Ni-base superalloys which are useful to 0.75 Tm (Tm is
the absolute melting temperature of Ni), one may anticipate development of
an Al base alloy useful to approximately 4250C or 800'F. In order to de-
velop a successful Al alloy for use at such a temperature, many basic prin-
ciples must be considered. It is proposed that such an alloy will owe its
5%. strength at high as well as room temperature to a uniform dispersion of
" second phase particles which are coherent or semi-coherent with the matrix.
To test this theory, two systems are under study:'S.S.
1. Al-Mg alloy matrix - MgAl 04 composite2. Al-Al.,(Zr,X) dispersions
Both of these systems were selected on the basis of lattice matching be-
tween an Al alloy matrix and the dispersed phase. Preliminary work was
done on Al-Al3Zr and Al-AI3 (ZrV) under AFOSR Grant No. 82-0005 where the
if results on dilute alloys were very promising. Current research on
Al-5 vol.% (Zr 25 V ,,) shows great promise; however, incoherent AloV was
found to form on grain boundaries in the more concentrated alloy which
leads to a precipitate free zone which increases in width on aging. There-
. fore, research has begun on AI-Zr-Ti alloys which won't have this problem.
PROGRESS AND RESULTS
1 .' 1. Al-Mg alloy matrix-MgAl.O spinel composite
The cubic spinel, nominal composition MgAl2 0, appears to be a better
candidate oxide for the dispersion strengthening of Al than the hexagonal
-iZ. oxide a-Al2 0. The lattice parameter of stoichiometric MgAl.0 4 is 8.083*% ,
which is almost twice that of Al, 4.04961. Thus a semicoherent interface
may be anticipated. Furthermore, at least cne spinel-structured oxide0.,
3
% %is%A*
5-O _;
exhibits some ductility at room temperature.2 If the dispersed spinel
particles in the Al alloy matrix have even very limited ductility, this
should result in a much better fracture toughness than with particles like
oy-Al 2 03 or SiC which behave in a very brittle fashion. Since the elastic
constants of spinel are considerably larger than those of Al, improved
stiffness as well as improved high temperature strength is expected from
dispersing spinel in an Al alloy matrix.
To date a procedure for preparing creep and elevated temperature
fatigue specimens of Al-Mg alloy matrix-spinel (MgAl.O4 ) or corundum ( -A1 2 )
dispersions has been developed. Al-3% Mg rapidly solidified powder for the
matrix was kindly provided for this research by the Alcoa Technical Center.
Commercially available spinel and a-A1203 powders were provided by
Baikowski. Composites containing 4 vol.% of either oxide were prepared by
mechanical alloying with I wt.% oleic acid as a "grinding" aid using alumina
pellets as the "grinding" medium. The mechanically alloyed powders were cold
pressed to 0.75 in diameter discs with a dual action die at 350 MPa pressure.
The cold pressed pellets and dies were heated to 71CPC for 5 minutes for
liquid metal infiltration and then pressure forged in a platen press heated
to 1400C to form discs 20 mm diameter and 2 mm thick. The pressure forged
discs were then cold rolled to 0.8 mm thickness with intermediate anneals
at 6002 C. The final densities were in the range 99 to 1007, of the theoreti-
cal. The specimens were cut using electro-discharge machining.
Transmission electron microscopy showed that a much better dispersion
of spinel particles in the Al-3% Mg matrix was achieved than with -alumina.
The former were dispersed within grains while the latter were at grain
Z boundaries having pinned them during recrystallization. This in itself may
..
5
be an indication that the matrix/spinel interface has lower interfacial
energy than the matrix/a-alumina interface within grains. The alumina
particles (150-300 U m diameter) were much larger than the spinel particles
(30-150 um). The former were not reduced in size by the mechanical alloy-
ing. However, in both cases the distribution of particles was uneven.
This resulted in uneven grain size.
Tensile tests were conducted at room temperature and creep tests at
• .t 410zC. The ultimate tensile stress of the AI(3% Mg)-4 vol.% spinel was
235 MPa while the elongation to fracture was 15%. For Al(3% Mg)-4 vol.%
a-alumina, the UTS was 210 MPa with 9% elongation to fracture. Better
properties can no doubt be achieved with more uniform particle dispersions
o and smaller particle size with a-alumina. The desired high strengths will
require higher volume fraction of particles.
The creep results at 41CPC are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Steady state creep data for Al(3% Mg)/4 vol.% spinel
and AI(3% Mg)/4 vol.% a-alumina metal matrix composites
Stress Strain Rate (sec-1 )
SMPa Al-spinel Al-alumina
17 1.3 x i0-
22 2 x 10 26 x 1030 105 x I0-6 990 X 10-635 624 x 10- 6
The creep resistance of the Al-spinel MMC at 41CPC is clearly better
than the Al-alumina MMC. This is at least in part due to the better more
* ,uniform particle dispersion achieved with the latter.
Future research will be focused on achieving better particle disper-
sions and on preparing and testing MMC samples with higher volume fraction
* of dispersed phase.
Of0.%IAh
6
"I.
* 2. Al-Al (V,Zr) dispersions
In the previous studies on this system reported in the previous annual
report, a remarkably slow volumetric coarsening rate of 1.0 Y 10-28 m3 /h at
425'C was found for the metastable cubic LI2 structured Al3 (Zr 25 V.,,) in
5 vol.% precipitate melt spun ribbons (alloy No. 4). However, a region
deplete of LI2 precipitates, i.e., a precipitate free zone (PFZ), formed
along the grain boundaries during aging due to formation of the stable
phases. It was also found that the PFZ width increased with aging time.
In order to understand the growth mechanism for the LI2 phase as well as
that for the PFZ, detailed studies of the same ribbons, i.e., Al-5 vol.%
AI,3(ZrcV.) alloy, aged at different temperatures were undertaken.
* Figure I shows the coarsening results of the LI2 precipitates at 425,
450 and 500'C, where the cube of the average particle radius, r, is plotted
against aging time, t. The linear correlation coefficient, R, and the
slope for each best fitting line are given in Table 2. A linear relation-
ship between the cube of I and t seems well satisfied. An LSW volume
diffusion controlled process described by Eq.(l) seems to be the growth
mechanism for the LI2 structured Al3 (Zr.2 5 V.,) precipitates.
12.8aDV 2 C
Mr o - 9RT t = Kt (1)
Taking the logarithm from both sides of Eq.(l), the activation energy for
the particle coarsening, Qc" can be calculated from the plot of
ln(K/V 2 C a) vs. the reciprocal of RT. To a first order approximation,m
the factors C , V and a are assumed to be constant in the temperature
range from 425CC to 500CC. This is a good assumption for the last two
terms. Then, Q is calculated to be 294 KJ/mole. This value is closer toc
%0.
-4•
AI
[" 7
the activation energy for diffusion of Zr in Al than that for V, 242 and
82 KJ/mole respectively. Consequently, the volume diffusion of Zr is
thought to be the rate controlling process for the Ostwald ripening of the
Li phase. Furthermore, Qc is corrected to 230 KJ/mole after considering
the temperature dependence of C This value is even closer to the acti-
vation energy for Zr diffusion in Al. In the above calculation, C was
taken from the solvus line of the stable Al3 Zr, DO2 3 structured phase,
even though it is expected to be somewhat different from that of the LI2
phase. The latter is not accurately known at this time. Nevertheless,
the above results are self-consistent suggesting that the coarsening
kinetics of the Li2 phase is an LSW volume diffusion controlled process.
4The growth kinetics of the PFZ at 425, 450 and 500'C were investigated
and the results are summarized in Fig. 2 where the PFZ half-width, W /2 ,PFZ
is plotted vs. square root of the annealing time as done by Jensrud and
Ryum' for Al-Li alloys. According to them, the growth behavior of the PFZ
in an Al-Li alloy which has a similar microstructure to the present
Al-Zr-V alloy can be described by the following equation,
. /2 = b(Dt)i , (2)
where D is the diffusivity of solute in Al and b is a complicated function
of the alloy composition and the solute contents in the Al matrix adjacent
to the both sides of the PFZ.1 Using the same procedure as done pre-
viously for coarsening of the LI2 phase, the activation energy for the
PFZ growth is calculated to be 285 KJ/mole by taking b as a constant since
it is only a slowly varying function of the solute concentration in the Al
matrix in the temperature range concerned here. The calculated activation
energy indicates that PFZ growth in the present alloy is also controlled
16"K 'e
8
by the volume diffusion of Zr, not V, in the Al matrix. The grain boundary
precipitates are, iowever, mainly AhV. A possible explanation is given
as follows. Since V diffuses faster than Zr in Al at the aging temperature,
as soon as LI2 particles dissolve, vanadium diffuses toward the grain
boundaries and it leaves a local matrix with a high Zr content behind. The
further dissolution of other Li2 particles will be retarded until this ex-
cess of Zr diffuses to the grain boundaries to form Al Zr or to partition
into the Al.,0V as a solute. As a result, the final growth rate of PFZ is
then determined by the volume diffusion of Zr in Al. This leads to the
promising result that the PFZ will grow only slowly at the application
temperature of interest for this alloy.
* In the present alloy, most of grain boundary precipitates are A!1oV.
High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), as shown in
Fig. 3, disclosed that micro-twins and stacking faults are frequently
observed in this phase. The average intercept length, L, the volume
-fraction, t, of the grain boundary precipitates and grain size D after
- various aging times were measured by quantitative metallography. The
results are listed in Table 3. Basically, the volume fraction 6 increases
linearly with square root of aging time. However, since grain size does
not increase much, less than a 10% increase after 1200 hours of exposure
at 4250C following a preaging at 5001C for 2.5 hours, the Al1oV particles
forming along the grain boundaries have the positive effect of preventing
1
grain growth.
Figure 4 is an HRTEM image of an LI2 particle aged at 6000C for 1.5
hours. The atomic image of the LI2 phase is clearly distinguishable
from the matrix. The ordered structure of the Li_ phase still remains
t after exposure at this high temperature. It is also shown that the
0.%
"-"S-%i 4 % 9 % % % "" % %% % %"% '.% % - % -' "%- -. "..'' " "- '."- - ". - ". . ",
9
interface between the LI particle and Al matrix is fully coherent. How-
ever, a fault structure proven to be an anti-phase domain boundary is formed
inside the Li2 particles, as shown in Fig. 5. This anti-phase boundary can
be caused by coalescence of two out-of-phase LI2 particles or by the shear
produced by a dislocation on fl0o0 planes.
The Li2 particles in extruded bars behave similar in their growth
kinetics as in the melt spun ribbon at 4250C. The results are shown in
Fig. 6 from where a volumetric growth rate of 1.1 x i0- 9 m3 /h is calculated.
It was also found that creep, done at 425°C, increases the growth rate of
the LI 2 particles by around 56%.
More concentrated AI-Zr-V alloys designed to contain 15 and 25 vol.% LI2
* phase made by melt spinning were studied. TEM observations disclosed that a
large amount of coarse AI.1 V particles, around I Lm in size exist in the as-
quenched 25 vol.% alloy, which results in the ribbons being brittle after
quenching. The 15 vol.7 ribbons are ductile even though lots of Al10 V phase
particles were observed after quenching, but their particle size are gener-
-~ ally smaller, around 0.1 ,jn. After aging at 500'C, the spherical LI2 phase
precipitated out in the 15 vol.". alloy. However, the amount of L12 phase is
less than in the previous 5 vol.% alloy. This is because less solutes re-
mained dissolved in the matrix after quenching. Apparently, a rapid solidi-
fication process having a higher quenching rate than the process used at
Lockheed in the present study is required to produce a more concentrated and
useful alloy.
An error in reporting the creep results was made in the last annual
-? report due to a mixup between alloys 2 and 3. Chemical analyses showed
that alloy 2, which has the highest Zr content, actually crept faster than
the other two alloys. Figure 7 presents the correct creep results where the
%%
O.
-S -i "4 .. ", % % % % " % % % % , % ". % ,•% % .% . .,.-.,..° , -. . " . . . . . . , °
10
worst te~t result from each alloy is given. High temperature tensile tests
carried out at 425,C reveal that the yield strengths of alloys 2 and 4 are
14 and 40 MPa respectively. Apparently, the poor creep properties ob-
served in alloy 2 are due to its weak strength at 425'C. Detailed micro-
structural studies found that more coarse equilibrium phase particles,
around 1-5 .Lm in size, are present in alloy 2 than are present in alloys
3 and 4. This is suggested to be one of the reasons why alloy 2 is so
weak. The high Zr alloy has a higher melting temperature which makes it
more difficult to process by rapid solidification.
It should be pointed out that Al-Mg with 4 vol.% spinel has better
- creep resistance than the Al-4 vol.,. Al, (Zr ,_V ,) alloy (alloy No. 4).
REFERENCE
1. 0. Jensrud and N. Ryum, "The Development of Microstructures in Al-LiAlloys", Mat. Sci. Eng. 64 (1984) 229-236.
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS -- AF SUPPORTED
1. M. S. Zedalis and M. E. Fine, "Precipitation and Ostwald Ripening inDilute Al Base-Zr-V Alloys", Metall. Trans. 17A (1986) 2187.
2. L. Angers, M. E. Fine and J. R. Weertman, "Effect of Plastic Deforma-tion on the Coarsening of Dispersoids in a Rapidly Solidified Al-Fe-CeAlloy", Metall. Trans. 18A (1987) 555.
3. R. E. Lewis, D. D. Crooks, Y. C. Chen, M. E. Fine and J. R. Weertman,"High Temperature AI-Zr-V Alloys Using Rapid Solidification Processing",
, Proc. of 3rd Intl. Conf. on Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials* and Structures, B. Wilshire and R. W. Evans (eds.) The Institute o,"* Metals, London (1987) pp. 331-346.
- . 4. Y. C. Chen, M. E. Fine, J. R. Weertman and R. E. Lewis, "CoarseningBehavior of LI2 Structured Al (ZrV,_x) Precipitates in Rapidly
SO.Solidified Al-Zr-V Alloy", Scripta Metall. 21 (1987) 1003.
5. Y. C. Chen, M. E. Fine, J. R. Weertman and R. E. Lewis, "A PromisingStrengthening Dispersoid for the High Temperature Al Alloy", presentedat the 116th TMS Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 1987. Paper inpreparation.
O.%
.
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS -- AF SUPPORTED (continued)
6. T. S. Creasy, J. R. Weertman and M. E. Fine, "Al Alloy with Spinelfor Oxide Dispersion Strengthening" to be presented(and published)
at the TMS Symposium on Dispersion Strengthened Aluminum Alloys tobe held in Phoenix, Arizona at the 1988 TMS Annual Meeting 25-29
January 1988. Paper in preparation.
7. M. E. Fine, "Stability and Coarsening of Dispersoids in AluminumAlloys" to be presented (and published) at the TMS Symposium on
Dispersion Strengthened Aluminum Alloys to be held in Phoenix,
Arizona at the 1988 Annual Meeting 25-29 January 1988. Paper in
preparation.
8. Terry S. Creasy, "Oxide Dispersion-Strengthening of Al-3% Mg with
Spinel and Alumina", M.S. Thesis, Northwestern University, Dept. of
Materials Science & Engineering, Evanston, IL.
w-4.
-'
" -°
.4..
0
.
a.." TABLE 2.
Measured coarsening rate constant, K,
and coefficient of linearity, R, forL12 Al 3 (Zr. . V._ s ) precipitates at
425, 450 and 5000C.
Temperature K
(0C) (m3 /hr) R
425* 1.03 x i0-28 0.9974,
", 450* 6.13 x 10 2 8 0.997
500 1.28 x 10 - 2 6 0.996
* Specimens were preaged at 500C for
2.5 hrs. to prevent cellular preci-
-. pitation.
.4
TABLE 3.
Changes of average intercept length, L.,
volume fraction, t, of grain boundaryprecipitates, and grain size, D, in alloy4 ribbon with aging time at 425'C.
Aging Time i D(hours) (jnm) (UM)
0 0.18 0.023 3.4
200 0.25 0.031 3.53
400 0.32 0.034 3.7
800 0.34 0.039 3.8
1200 0.35 0.041 4.0
12
W W-' V p
6,,
14.0 3 ~: T=425 0 C
12.0- A: T=450 0C
10.0 : T=500 0C
S4.0
2.0 J,5 s.. 6.0
~7
*0.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450Annealing Time(hrs.)
I,
Fig. 1Coarsening kinetics of LI2 A13(Zr. .. v7 ) precipitates at
425, 450 and 500'C, after a pre-treatment of 2.5 hours at
5000C in 4 vol.% precipitate alloy (alloy No. 4)..5
.5
.5
.5
I
,J. 400-,
360 T=425 0C
53 2o- 0 T=450 C
280- T=500 0C
S240-
200-
"l 160-
P80-
-440.
6 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32Square Root of Time(h 1/2)
Fig. 2
Growth kinetics of PFZ at 425, 450 and 500 0 C, after a pre-
treatment of 2.5 hours at 5000 C (alloy No. 4).
-10.
S8.
10.0
(N
X., 0
''SIO m /h
2.0
0.0 - '
0 100 200 300 400 500Annealing Time(hrs.)
Fig. 6Growth kinetics of Li2 phase at 4250Cin extruded bar.
r C- F rW'
a0N
~ 4 4 ~- ~ .O
20.0 - Fai lure T = 425°C
18.0 P = 17MPa
16.0
14.0 Al-Zr-V 2
m; 12.0
10.0
, 8.0
6.0 Failure
4.0 Terminated" " .0Te rm i n ated
Al-Zr-V 3r2.02
0.0 I
10 1 10 102 10
Creep Time (hrs.)
Fig. 7
Creep results of Al-Zr-V alloys at 425'C.
Alloy 2: Al + 5 vol.% At3 (Zr., V. 25)
Alloy 3: Al + 5 vol.% Al3(Zr. V.
Alloy 4: Al + 5 vol.7o Al (Zr V. )
0
%0%