Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde...

36
Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access Steven Kum Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital/Changi General Hospital Singapore

Transcript of Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde...

Page 1: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

UltrasoundGuided Puncture for

Retrograde Access

Steven Kum Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon

Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital/Changi General Hospital

Singapore

Page 2: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access

• Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice

• Indication:

– Crossing Lesions when antegrade attempts fail

– Intentional early retrograde access to avoid extensive antegrade subintimal dissection

– Complete retrograde access for the whole intervention (TAMI)

Page 3: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Preserving collaterals

Antegrade subintimal approach would destroy collaterals ➔

use early retrograde approach

Page 4: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Basic Anatomy

Courtesy Jihad Mustaphah

Page 5: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Ways to perform Retrograde Access

1. Ultrasound Guided (USG)

2. Fluoroscopy

3. Open Technique

Page 6: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Choosing target vessel

1. Angiosome concept/Wound Related Artery?

2. Vessel Size , Quality and Tortousity

3. Location of vessel – avoiding areas around joints

4. Length of unoccluded vessel proximal to puncture site for support

5. Potential sites for bailout bypass

Page 7: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Sheathless access

or

2.9 Fr pedal sheath

Sheathless access,

2.9 Fr pedal sheath

or

4 French sheath

0.025“ GW

Courtesy Schmidt

Types of Tibial Access

1. High Tibial

2. Tibial/Pedal

Page 8: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Popliteal Block and Sedation

• Popliteal Block + Saphenous nerve block• Blocking the sciatic nerve at level of popliteal

fossa• Achieves Anaesthesia for 4 hrs of entire distal

2/3 of lower leg and Analgesia for 24 hrs(Marcaine and Lignocaine used)

Page 9: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

US GUIDED TIBIAL/PEDAL RETROGRADE ACCESS

Page 10: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Position and Anaesthesia - PT

Ankle Neutral Ankle Dorsi-Flexed

Page 11: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Equipment

Freq : 13-6 MHzDepth: 6 cmFootplate : Narrow*Retrograde Pedal Access, Brachial /Radial access, AVF Interventions*

4 cm 21 G Needle0.018 wire

Page 12: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

PT – Transverse and Longitudinal Section

Artery 2 Veins Assess the quality of

puncture site

Page 13: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Generous Skin Incision – Before Puncture

Page 14: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Key points

Needle at centre of probe

Needle at the edge of probe

Page 15: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Needle at the edge of probe

Area of interest at centre of

screen

Key points

Page 16: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Key pointsFull Shaft of Needle and Needle tip is Visualized

Whole Length of TragetVessel is Visualized

Angle of approach is

30 - 45 degrees

Page 17: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

USG PT access

V18 wire Short Taper

Page 18: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

US GUIDED HIGH TIBIAL RETROGRADE ACCESS

Page 19: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

High Tibial Access

• Advantages– Easy haemostasis, avoids cumbersome P3 approach

– Can be done supine without bending knee

– Larger vessel (as compared to pedal)

– Ability to place 4F up to 6F sheath for tough CTOs ➔ bilateral stiff Terumo wires and angled support catheters

– Avoids pedal access which could be used for bypass

• Disadvantages– Can potentially damage vital ATA runoff

Page 20: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Case eg

Small AVF

Page 21: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing
Page 22: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

PitfallsPotential inadvertent wiring of

recurrent ATA

Page 23: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

SOME TRICKS FOR RETROGRADE ACCESS

Page 24: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Avoid Tortious vessels

Page 25: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Having enough support

Straight portion of DP to puncture

2-3 cm of patent artery for support

Page 26: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Puncturing small arteries –Lateral Plantar US Guided

0.014 wire + dilator only for access

Page 27: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Puncturing a non essential vessel for access

Puncturing the Medial Plantar Artery (more superficial & medial course) to open the Lateral Plantar Artery

V18 in Medial Plantar

Page 28: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Snaring/Rendevous

Popliteal Artery

Within Occluded

Tibial vessel

Page 29: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

HAEMOSTASIS OF RETROGRADE ACCESS

Page 30: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Haemostasis – High Tibial

1. Direct Compression

2. Blood Pressure Cuff

3. Low Pressure Balloon angioplasty

Shallow artery –Anterior compression is

sufficient

Page 31: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Haemostasis – Tibial/pedal

Peroneal and PT are deep seated artery –Anterior compression would be useless➔BPcuff or balloon assisted

Anterior compression for ATA

Page 32: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

When I would not do an USG retrograde

• Peroneal (especially in a fat patent)

• Very swollen legs (plenty of soft tissue fluid worsens imaging)

• Calcium is very clear

Courtesy Schmidt

Page 33: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Calcification is clear – Fluoro is easier

Page 34: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

USG vs Fluoro

USG FluoroAdvantage • Able to assess quality of

vessel• Real time – especially

useful in uncompliant patient

• Less radiation

• Easier setup

Disadvantage • Learning curve• Need dedicated sterile

ultrasound with High Freq Probe

• Difficult over joints eganterior ankles

• Radiation exposure• Tough in uncooperative

patient

Page 35: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

Summary

• Contemporary techniques to tackle CTOs require retrograde access

• US guided access is safe, reduces radiation exposure but requires practice and patience

• Quality of equipment is important

Page 36: Ultrasound Guided Puncture for Retrograde Access · Retrograde Tibial/Pedal Access •Retrograde Tibial access used in 30-40% of BTK interventions in my practice •Indication: –Crossing

UltrasoundGuided Puncture for

Retrograde Access

Steven Kum Vascular & Endovascular Surgeon

Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital/Changi General Hospital

Singapore