UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients...

9
UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in the analysis

description

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure Funnel plot detailing the proportion of white incident patients in England by centre

Transcript of UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients...

Page 1: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006,HES admissions and ONS records included in the analysis

Page 2: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.2. Mean diagnosis coding depth according to date of admission

Page 3: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.3. Funnel plot detailing the proportion of white incident patientsin England by centre

Page 4: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.4. Late presentation over time determined from HES speciality coding for38 centres with consistent HES coding between October 2003 and October 2006

Page 5: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.5. Prevalence of comorbid conditions at the time of starting RRTderived from UKRR and HES in 10,276 patients with data from both sources

Page 6: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.6. Mean comorbidity score by age group

Page 7: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.7. Mean comorbid score derived from HESaccording to year of start of RRT

Page 8: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report

Figure 13.8a. Mean comorbidity score per centre for patients surviving beyond 90 days,determined from UKRR comorbid conditions identified from admissions prior to starting RRT

Page 9: UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report Figure 13.1. Consort diagram detailing incident RRT patients 2002–2006, HES admissions and ONS records included in.

Figure 13.8b. Mean comorbidity score per centre for patients surviving beyond 90 days stratified by RRT modalityat 90 days, determined from UKRR comorbid conditions identified from admissions prior to starting RRT

UK Renal Registry 14th Annual Report