ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
-
Upload
anand-swami -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
1/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 1 of 50
No. L-1(1)/ 2011-CERC
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONNEW DELHI
Coram : Dr. Pramod Deo , Cha irpersonShri S.Jayaraman, Member
Shri V. S. Verma, Member
Shri M. Deena Dayalan, Member
Date: 6.3.2012
In the matter of
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled
Interc hange c harge s and rela ted ma tters) (Sec ond Amendment)
Regulations, 2012
STATEMENT OF REASONS
The Co mmission p ub lished on its web site on 19.08.2011 the d ra ft
amendments to the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
(Unscheduled Interchange charges and related matters)
Reg ula tions, 2009 (hereina fter refe rred to as the p rinc ipa l
regulations) as amended from time to time, inviting
c omments/ suggestions from the sta keho lders by 10.09.2011.
2. Ab out 25 sta keho lders, inc lud ing Sta te Regulatory Co mmissions,
Generato rs, Bene fic iaries, NLDC/ PGCIL, RPCs, SLDCs, consum er etc .,
filed their written sub missions/ sug gestions. A list o f sta keholders who
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
2/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 2 of 50
made their comments/suggestions is enclosed as Annexure-I. The
Commission also held a public hearing on 19.10.2011 giving
opportunity to the stakeholders to present their views on various
proposed amendments.
3. The Commission ha s fina lized the Centra l Elec tric ity Regulatory
Commission ((Unscheduled Interchange charges and related
matte rs) (Sec ond Amendment) Reg ula tions, 2011(hereinafte r
referred to as "Amend me nt Reg ula tions") a fter de ta iled deliberations
and due consideration of the various issues raised by the
stakeho lders. These a re d isc ussed in the suc c ee d ing pa ragraphs.
General
4. In the proposed d ra ft amendments, UI Cha rges and UI Pric e
Vector were based on Energy charges of generating stations
regulated by CERC for the period August 2010 to January 2011. With
the na rrow ing d ow n of the o pera ting g rid freq uenc y ba nd from 49.5
-50.2 Hz to 49.7 50.2 Hz, step size was proposed to be reduced from
0.02 Hz to 0.01 Hz for the UI vec to r. The UI p rice vec to r was designed
such that UI charges were set at the grid frequency of "50.2 Hz and
above" as Zero, UI Charge at grid frequency in step of "Not below
50.0Hz and below 50.01Hz" as`1.65 /kWh (Median Value of energy
c harges of c oa l/ lignite based genera ting sta tions), UI Cha rge a t g rid
frequency in step of "Not below 49.80Hz and below 49.81Hz" as
`. 4.50/kWh to ensure that all stations using imported coal also get
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
3/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 3 of 50
despatched, UI Charges at grid frequency "below 49.7 Hz" as
`9.0 /kWh was linked to highest c ost o f gene ra tion of p ow er.
5. The responses to the p roposa l a re as und er:
(a ) Er. Padamjee t Singh ha s sub mitted tha t the worst p erforming
p lant o f Auriaya (highest SHR) should not b e c onsidered as
benchmark for specifying Max UI Charge. Moreover, the year 2011-
12 is the last ye ar of the 12th Five year plan and it is very unlikely that
capacity additions would take place in the last quarter of 2011-12.
Therefo re, the Co mmission may defe r the imp lem enta tion of UI
amendment till 31st Marc h, 2012.
(b ) Utta r Pradesh Power Corpora tion Limited (UPPCL) has sub mitted
that there is no necessity for hike in UI charges as the grid is running
norma lly in sa fe zone of frequenc y. The hike in UI c ha rges sha ll also
inc rea se the ra tes of e lec tric ity in the ma rket from ene rgy excha nge
and bilateral agreements. Narrowing of frequency is not requiredbec ause system c an run in the freq uenc y range of 50.5 Hz to 49.0Hz.
UPPCL has further submitted that the methodology of hike in U.I.
charges by linking a particular frequency to specific rate of power
sta tion viola tes sec tion 61 of the Elec tric ity Ac t, 2003 ( 2003 Ac t )
bec ause U.I. cha rges a re third pa rt o f tariff. Sec tion 61 (d ) & (g ) of
the 2003 Act have not been followed for making these regulations.
UPPCL has filed 5 writ petitions before Hon'ble High Court of
Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow bench) And the Hon'ble Court
has passed two interim orders in the ma tter and is p resently hearing
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
4/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 4 of 50
the pet itions on reg ula r basis. Therefo re, the d ra ft amendment m ay
be deferred till the decision of the Hon'ble High Court. UPPCL has
submitted tha t elec tric ity is supp lied into the grid from a ll the pow er
sta tions (having d ifferent rate s of e lec tric ity) a t a ll the frequenc ies; so
linking the U.I. c ha rges a t a pa rtic ula r freq uenc y to a ny "spec ific ra te
based power sta tion" is a rb itra ry. It does not reflec t the a c tua l c ost of
elec tric ity. So this methodology is inc orrec t and vio la tes the sec tion
61 (d) & (g) of the 2003 Act, which mandates to fix tariff based on
ac tua l c ost of elec tric ity.
UPPCL ha s submitted tha t NTPC has bee n g rea tly b enefitted by
high UI c ha rges. Ac c ord ing to UPPCL, NTPCs 13 genera ting sta tion's
schedules and UI generation during 2009-10 shows that on an
average, 1.35 %of excess generation is done over schedule leading
to an inco me o f over` 173 Crore (for 1145 MUs) due to the fac t tha t
UI rates are higher than energy charges by `1.51 per unit for
purcha sing 1145 MU of e lec tric ity. Therefore, UI ra tes should be
reduced.
UPPCL ha s further sub mitted tha t Anta GPS ha s genera ted 14.15%
excess generation leading to income of ` 45.92 c ores. Da d ri GPS,
FGUTPS-II and NCTPS-I have a lso earned `21.93 crores,`6.16 croresand ` . 3.55 crores respectively through extra generation of 2.45%,
1.35% & 2.45% and UI earning therefrom.
UPPCL has submitted tha t g eneration o f e lec tric ity in exc ess of the
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
5/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 5 of 50
schedule is an act of indiscipline and therefore, excess generation
should not be paid. Regulation 2.18 of Central Electricity Regulatory
Commission (Terms & Cond itions of Ta riff) Regulations,2001 p rovided
that when the actual generation is more than schedule, the UI
c harges due to extra gene ra tion should b e reduc ed to zero. In view
of above, Regulation 24 (2) (i) of Central Electricity Regulatory
Commission (Terms & Cond ition o f Ta riff) Regulations, 2004 and
Regulation 6 (3) & (4) of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
(Unscheduled interchange and related matters) Regulation, 2009
and its amendment dated 28.04.2010 are arbitrary and unjustified,
whic h a llow s payment for extra gene ra tion a t UI ra te.
(c ) MPPTCL ha s sub mitted tha t the utilities a re d rawing 9.11% of UI
power from the grid with the power available/injected by the
generating companies on the present frequency range of 49.2 to
50.3 Hz. Further, 17.34 % narrowing down of permissible frequency
range will increase the UI charges on utilities, which subsequently will
be p assed on to the c onsumers. The inc rea se in po wer purc ha se
amount w ill further inc rease the ta riff of Distribution Companies. The
prop osed ac tion o f the Commission will defy the p rovisions of Sec tion
61 (d) of the 2003 Act which provides for safeguarding of
consumers interest and at the same time recovery of the cost of
elec tric ity in a reasona b le manner.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
6/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 6 of 50
MPPTCL further sta ted tha t a t p resent there is a defic it o f 8.64 %
between the demand and supply of power from available sources.
The d em and is muc h higher tha n the injec tion. The p roposed
freq uenc y range is too narrow and does not meet the required level
for equilibrium to be maintained between the demand and supply
of elec tric a l ene rgy.
MPPTCL ha s further submitted tha t the benefic ia ries have entered
into severa l PPAs and TSAs to ensure suffic ient p roc urement o f
elec tric a l energy to ma tc h the demands of the ultima te c onsumers.
But for reasons beyond control of the beneficiaries, it has not been
possible till now, as the proposed power projects are getting
delayed for som e rea son or other. The utilities a re c om pelled to use
UI power to mee t the ir c onsumer de mands. Therefo re, the
permissible frequency range should not be narrowed down and
should rema in unchang ed .
(d ) Chhatt isga rh SPTCL ha s sub mitted tha t hike in UI ra te is ve ry steep
due to na rrow ing d ow n of freq uenc y ba nd w hic h ma y ca use hike in
ra te of elec tric ity in the market a s most o f time, UI ra te is a refe renc e
ra te in trad ing. It has been sugg ested that freq uenc y ba nd m ay be
kep t a s 50.2 to 49.6.
(e) Power Company of Karnataka has submitted that in order to
ma inta in g rid freq uenc y a s per IEGC, the Sta te of Karna taka has
done load shedding in both urban and rural areas and has been
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
7/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 7 of 50
forc ed to purc hase pow er a t higher ra tes. It has been further
submitted that there is delay in commissioning of the projects for
mo re than one to two yea rs. On ac c ount of co ntinuous inc rea se in
demand without c orrespond ing increase in genera tion, the inc rea se
in UI rates may result in increase rates in open market and short term
proc urem ent/ b ila teral exc hanges. The c osts of p ow er from the liquid
based p rojec ts a re inc rea sing day by day. The p rop osed reg ula tion
will give more scope to Distribution Licensees to dispatch liquid
based pow er projec t run by the CGS units of o ther generating
stations. Ultimately, the power purchase cost will be increased and
burden on the consumers. It has been requested to operate in the
frequenc y rang e of 49.5-50.2 Hz.
(f) Karna ta ka Power Transmission Corpora tion Limited (KPTCL) ha s
submitted that the penalty levied from those beneficiaries who
overdraw when the frequency is between 49.849.7 Hz is very high
and for each 0.01 Hz, 40.91 paise penalty is levied, which should be
reduced. Already scheduled and unscheduled load shedding are
being carried out by the constituents. Hence, for frequency below
49.8 Hz, levy o f huge pena lty is no t feasible. KPTCL ha s further
submitted that without adding adequate generation as per
sc hed uled da tes g iven by the genera tors in c entral sec tor will ma ke
the operation of grid between 49.80 and 50.20 Hz highly difficult for
a ll SLDC s.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
8/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 8 of 50
(g ) MSEDCL ha s sta ted tha t it is no t indulging in ind isc rimina te
overdrawa l from the g rid and in sp ite o f contrac ting p ow er to meet
its antic ipa ted dem and, if and when it overdraws from the g rid , suc h
excursions a re d ue to the rea l time va ria tions in the d em and and / or
supply. However, utmost care is taken to implement corrective
ac tions imme d ia te ly and to a b ide b y grid d isc ip line. MSEDCL ha s
further submitted that it would be practically impossible for a huge
system like MSEDCL to matc h its genera tion a va ilab ility and load in
ea c h freq uenc y step of 0.01Hz. Therefo re, c onsidering the fac t tha t
the g rid has been op era ting a t a n imp roved freq uenc y during 2010-
11 and there has not been any major grid security problem during
these yea rs, MSEDCL ha s sug gested for c ontinuing with existing UI
rates and the Commission may levy additional penal charges on
utilities without tightening the operating frequency band to further
ensure the grid sec urity and book the erring utilities.
(h) POSOCO ha s submitted tha t narrow ing grid freq uenc y range w ill
he lp in sync hroniza tion o f SR and NEW grid , and will he lp in a bsorb ing
RES like wind ene rgy.
(i) PTC has submitted tha t na rrowing grid freq uenc y range w ill help in
be tter grid m ana gement.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
9/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 9 of 50
(j) Tamil Nad u Generat ion and Distribution Corpora tion Limited
(TANGEDCO ) has sub mitted tha t the Commissions observation in
para 6 that "the concern that shrinkage of UI frequency band may
lead to increase in load shedding is mitigated in view of additions
taking p lac e p resently" does not appea r to have b een ma de b ased
on ac tua l position. The 11th Plan capacity addition which was
envisaged at 78700 MW has been pruned down to 62000 MW and
the p resent rea lity is tha t it may not exceed 50000 MW. The
antic ipa ted add ition o f 16531 MW befo re 31.3.2012, end of 11th Plan,
ma y not materia lize fully and may sp ill over to the first yea r of the 12th
plan.
(k) R2I ha s sub mitted tha t sho rt fall o f over 43% during 2010-11 and
short fall of over 29% during 2011-12 (till August 2011) have been
rep orted in the c apac ity add ition in the c ountry. The Comm ission
has ove restima ted the supp ly side a nd und erestima ted the d emand.
6. We have c onsidered the ob jec tions and suggestions as note d
in p ara 5 above. UPPCL and MPPTCL ha ve questioned the ra tiona le
of UI c ha rges. The Commission, in the Sta tement of Reasons to the
first a mend ment to UI regulat ions issued on 26.05.2010 has dea lt w ith
simila r ob jec tions of UPPCL as under:
"A. Whethe r the UI Cha rges and va rious UI c ap ra tes a re ag a inst the provisions ofElectric ity Ac t, 2003 and aga inst the Hon ble Supreme Court Judgm ent
9. UPPCL has subm itted tha t the p rop osed princ ip les and me thod olog ies app lied forcharging UI rates for deviation from schedule is against the provisions of Electricity Act,
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
10/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 10 of 50
2003 (the Ac t) a nd ag a inst the Hon ble Supreme C ourts order dated 17.8.2007 in thec ase o f Ce ntral Pow er Distribut ion Co & ot hers vs CERC & Anr. [(2007) 8 SCC 197] a ndCERC order d a te d 04.01.2000 on ABT.
10. UPPCL has further stated that the UI being 3 rd part o f ta riff as per ABT Orde r of4.1.2000 and as per the Hon b le Sup rem e Court s judg me nt in Cent ra l Pow er Distribution
Co & o rs Vs. CERC & Anr, it m ust b e c onsistent w ith Sec tion 61 (d) and 61(g) o f the Ac t,which provide that the tariff progressively reflects the (incurred) cost of supply andtherefore, UI rate c anno t b e linked to c ostliest form of g ene rat ion. The Comm ission wa stherefore, req uested to fix ap prop riate rates as pe r the Ac t. Ac c ording to UPPCL, there isa need to take new and alternative steps by providing additional allocations/powerpurchase a rrange me nts favo urab le for deficit Sta tes and by restraining the und ueenric hme nt o f p rofit to ge nerato rs/ surplus Sta tes who are ea rning at the cost o f thedefic it sta tes. Simila r views have b ee n ec hoe d b y othe r bene ficiaries na me ly MPPTCL,GVUNL, HPPC etc. According to the UPPCL, the proposed UI charges are required to bed iscussed be fore Cent ral Ad visory Comm ittee as per sec tion 81 of the Ac t.
11. UPPCL has further stated that the Govt. of India may be advised by theCommission u/s 79 (2) of the Act to allocate power from 15 % unallocated share, tode ficit State s and cha nge the p olic y of a lloc ation to the State s.
12. We are una b le to subsc ribe to the p oint of view o f UPPCL and othe r be neficiariesreg a rd ing UPPCLs interp reta tion of the Hon'ble Supreme Court s judgm ent c ited abo ve.The interpretat ion a ims to que stion the very essenc e of the conc ep t o f UI as acommercial mechanism to ensure grid discipline which has been authoritatively settledby the Hon'ble Supreme Court and therefore, the a rgum ents a re d evo id o f any merit asd isc ussed hereina fte r.
13. The Hon b le Sup rem e Co urt in its judg ment da ted 17.8.2007 in Ce ntral Pow erDistribution Co & ors supra has explained the concept of Unscheduled Interchange inthe following terms:
WHAT IS UI (UNSCHEDULED INTERCHANG E)
10. In ad dition to tw o c ha rge s, a third cha rge c onte mp lated in the ABT sc hem e is forthe unsc hed uled intercha nge of p ow er (UI c harges). The UI c ha rge s are p aya bledepending upon what is deviated from the schedule and also subject to the gridc ond itions at t hat p oint of time. This eleme nt wa s introduc ed to b ring ab out theeffe c tive d isc ipline in the system. Unde r this system UI cha rge s will be p ayab le, if:
i) a g ene rator gene rates mo re tha n the sc hed ule, thereby inc rea sing the freq uenc y;ii) a g ene rator gene rates less tha n the sc hed ule, thereby de c rea sing the freque nc y;iii) a b ene fic iary overdraws po we r, thereb y de c rea sing the freq uenc y;
iv) a b ene fic iary unde rdraw s pow er, thereby inc rea sing the freq uenc y.
11. It is thus clear from the above that UI charges are a commercial mechanism toma intain g rid d isc ipline. The UI cha rges pena lises whosoe ver c aused grid ind isc ipline,whether ge nerator (NTPC) o r d istributo r, is sub jec t to payme nt o f UI cha rges who a renot fo llow ing t he sched ule. The UI c harges a re no t p aya ble if the a ppe llants ma intainthe ir d rawl of elec tric ity consistent w ith the sc hed ule given b y them selves. Therefo re,there is no merit in the contention of the appellants that the UI charges are by way ofpena lty. {Emphasis laid}
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
11/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 11 of 50
14. The Hon b le Sup rem e Court framed the issues as und er:
(A) Whethe r the application o f Ava ilab ility Based Tariff (ABT) in relation to
Unscheduled Interchange (UI) charges, which otherwise is not a component of
tariff in terms of Regulation 15 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission(Terms and Co nd itions of Tariff) Reg ulations, 2004 and they a re liab le to b e he ld
as beyond the jurisdiction of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
(CERC)?
(C) Ca n the Availab ility Based Tariff as esta blished and p rovide d in the orde r
of the C ERC b y its order da ted 4.1.2000 be imp lemented unde r the p rovisions of
Electricity Act, 2003, particularly when there is no provision under the statute that
allows the CERC to levy Unsc hed uled Intercha nge Cha rge s?
(D) whe ther in the present fac ts and c ircumsta nc es as rega rds the Simha dri STPS
therma l sta tion of the Nationa l Therma l Power Co rporation (NTPC) whic h
ad mittedly supp lies po wer to t he State Grid and has no c onnec tion with the
ma nag em ent o f the Nationa l Grid, c an the CERC in suc h c irc umsta nces exercise,
pa rticularly when m at ters relating to the Sta te Grid falls within the role a nd
func tion of the Sta te Elec tric ity Reg ulato ry Comm ission?
15. While ruling on the ab ove que stions of law, the Hon ble Supreme Court o bservedas fo llow s:
Question (A) (22) The a pp lic a tion o f Ava ilab ility Based Tariff and imposition o f Unsc hed uledInterchange (UI) charges are essential part of the Functions of the CentralCo mm ission und er Sec tion 79(1)(h) of the Elec tric ity Ac t, 2003 which rea ds tospe c ify Grid Code having rega rd to the G rid Standards, and unde r Sub-sec tion
(2) of Sec tion 28 rea d w ith Sec tion 178(2)(g ) de a ling w ith the Cent ra l Co mm issionpo we rs to frame Grid C od e. The m aintena nc e of Grid disc ipline envisag ed underthe Grid Co de is reg ulate d by the m ec hanism o f ABT and UI c ha rges. There is nobasis for the a ppellant to c ontend tha t unless som eth ing is a p a rt of Tariff theCe ntral Commission c annot exerc ise p ow ers and func tions. The A BT and UIcha rge s are c om me rc ial mec hanism to c ontrol the utilities in sc hed uling, d ispa tc hand drawl and the UI charges are tariff or charges payable for deviations. In thefacts and circumstances mentioned above the legal position is clear and there isno a mb iguity in respec t o f the jurisdic tion of the Central Com mission.Question (C)(24) As already noticed, the Central Commission has the power and function toevolve commercial mechanism such as imposition of UI charges to regulate and
disc ipline. It is we ll settled tha t a po we r to regulate includes within it the po we r toen force . See Ind u Bhusan vs. Rama Sund eri, AIR 1970 SC 228, K. Ramana than vs.Sta te of Tamil Nadu (1985) 2 SCC 116, V.S. Rice and Oil Mills vs. Sta te of And hraPrad esh, AIR 1964 SC 1781, Dee pak Theatre, Dhuri vs. Sta te of Punjab , 1992Supp.(1) SCC 684.
Que stion (D)(25) In the fac ts and c irc umstanc es as alluded , and as pe r the Schem e o f theElectricity Act, 2003 mentioned above, the Central Commission has the plenary
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
12/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 12 of 50
power to regulate the Grid, particularly in the context of the Grid beinginteg rate d and c onnec ted ac ross the region co mp rising o f mo re tha n one State .The State Grid c annot be isolated and ca nnot b e seen a s inde pe ndent from theregion.
16. It is c lear from the ab ove judg me nt of the Sup rem e Court that the Central Comm ission has
plenary pow er with reg ard to ma intaining grid discipline in ac co rda nce with the Grid Cod e. Ithas also b een unam biguo usly uphe ld that UI c harges a re a c om me rc ial me chanism to m a intaingrid discipline and the Central Commission has the power and functions to evolve commerciamechanism in the form of imposition of UI charges to regulate and discipline the grid. As thepower of the Central Commission to impose the UI charges for maintaining the grid disciplinehas be en up held b y the Supreme Court, the c hallenge t o the UI c ha rge s as not b eing c onsistentw ith the p rovisions of Sec tion 61 of the Ac t c annot b e susta ined . The issue a s rega rds the lega lityof the levy of Unscheduled Interchange Charges has attained finality with the aforesaidjud gment of the Hon b le Sup rem e Court.
17. In this ba c k d rop , the ob ject ive of the UI me chanism nee ds to b e c lea rly unde rstood anapprec iate d . The Co mm ission in its Sta tem ent of Rea sons exp laining the va rious p rov isions of Uregulations 2009 has stated as follows:
UI pric ing is expe c ted to serve the twin ob ject ives of spe c ifying settlement rate
for deviations from schedules in normal operating range and ensuring grid
discipline on the one hand while ensuring maximisation of generation at optimal
cost for grid participants on the other. Further, UI pricing mechanism should
discourag e grid pa rticipa nts from using UI mec hanism as trad ing instrument.
18. Therefo re, the gene sis of spec ifying UI c ha rges based on m aximum c ost o f gridc onnec ted ge neration i.e. energy c ha rge s ba sed on liquid fue l is to e nsure tha t eve ry bitof available power should be supporting the grid, even the costliest one, under low gridfreq uenc y co ndition which indica tes a d efic it c ondition. It need s to b e a pp rec iate d tha tthe beneficiaries are under no compulsion to overdraw from the grid. If they adhere totheir respective schedules, then there shall be no UI liability accruing to them whatever
ma y be the grid c ondition.
19. Earlier, in 2007, when there was no market platform for trading in real time, the UImec hanism d id offer a real time ba lanc ing m arket o f po wer, where State s c ould buyand sell power at rates determined by the system conditions, i.e. buy or sell power athigh rates in deficit conditions and at low rates in surplus conditions. However, it wasob served that som e Sta tes took this as a license to o verdraw p ow er from the grid at theexpense o f the othe r Sta tes, thus jeopa rdising sec urity of the integ rat ed grid through loa dgeneration imbalance and overloading of transmission corridor. It was also found thatthe ove r d rawing Sta tes we re no t making UI payme nts in time . The C om mission hastherefore, taken a view that UI should not b e treate d as a rea l time ba lanc ing m arket b yputting limits on over drawal and under injection below grid frequency of 49.5 Hz and
provided for payment of additional UI charges for over drawls and under injectionsbelow grid frequenc y of 49.2 Hz, which were 40% highe r tha n the UI ra te a t 49.2 Hz.
20. In the m ea ntime , two p ow er exc hang es had also sta rted op erating b y then withthe a pp roval of the Com mission for the d ay-ahea d ma rket, which offered sep arate a ndtransparent p latfo rms for buying a nd selling o f po we r in the rea l time . Subseq uently, theda y ahea d c ontingenc y ma rket and t he intra-da y ma rket has also b een a llow ed by the
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
13/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 13 of 50
Commission to be operated by the Power Exchanges. Overloading of certaintransmission corridors have now be c om e a rea l prob lem.
21. In the view of the Commission, priority of Grid security is the highest in theoperation of the grid, and therefore, the generators / sellers and the beneficiaries/ thebuyers should use other avenues like bilateral trading or the trading platforms of power
exchanges by availing open access for meeting short term, medium term or long termarrangements or agreements. UI mechanism should not be used as a real time marketany mo re.
22. It ma y further be apprec ia ted tha t the ge nerato r or the Sellers and the Bene fic iariesor the buyers are legally entitled to or liable for their net injections or drawlscorresponding to their schedules conforming to allocation/shares in terms of theagreem ents or the c ontrac ts from spe c ific source or destination.
23. In view of the de libe rat ions in ab ove parag rap hs, we a re of the view that UImechanism as provided earlier and in its amended form as discussed in subsequentparag rap hs is neither ag a inst the p rovisions of the Ac t no r against t he Hon ble SupremeCo urt judg me nt in the c ase o f Ce ntral Pow er Distribut ion Co . supra and the C om mission sorder da ted 04.01.2000."
7. The Commission reitera tes the above views in response to the
ob jec tions of UPPCL and MPPTCL. As rega rds the sug gestions of
UPPCL to defer the amendment till the disposal of the UI cases
pending before the Honble High Court, we are of the view that
pendency of cases does not prevent the Commission to discharge
its statutory responsibility to regulate the inter-State transmission of
elec tric ity by ma king approp ria te regula tions or making amendm ent
to existing regulat ions.
8. With regard to the UPPCL's sub mission rega rd ing undue
profiteering by the NTPC c iting the UI deta ils in respec t o f 13 sta tions
of NTPC for the year 2009-10, we find tha t in c ases of sta tions exc ep t
Ta lc her TPS, the d ec la red c apac ity wa s more tha n the sum of
generation schedule and the UI generated by each station which
clearly indicates that the beneficiaries had not given the full
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
14/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 14 of 50
sc hedule, spec ia lly so in c ase of gas/ RLNG/ Liquid fuel based sta tions
namely, Anta, Dadri, Auraiya, and load center stations namely,
FGUTPS-I & II and NCTPSI. More UI gene ration in gas/ RLNG/ Liquid
fuel based stations namely, Anta, Auraiya, Dadri is understandable
as capacity on high cost RLNG and liquid fuel is not generally
dispatched by the beneficiaries and when the UI rate is favorable
and is higher than the energy charges on RLNG and liquid fuel, the
gene ra tor generates more p ow er as UI and helps the g rid . The use o f
energy rate of natural gas by the UPPCL is not correct. It is clarified
for the information of all concerned that there is no compulsion on
any of the utilities to overdraw from the grid and prudent utility
p rac tic e req uires tha t they ma nage the ir c onsumer loa d on the b asis
of the scheduled power arranged by them. If the utilities do not
overdraw from the grid, then they would not be required to pay UI
charges. When the utilities overdraw knowing fully well that UI rates
are applicable for such overdrawal, they are liable to pay for the
energy so d rawn a t UI ra tes.
Basis of determination of UI Rates
9. In the Exp lanato ry Mem orandum to the d ra ft amendm ent, the
energy charges of coal/lignite based generating stations regulatedby CERC for the period Aug ust 2010 to Janua ry 2011 were ta ken into
c onsidera tion for fixing the UI ra tes. The energy c ha rges for the
period Aug ust 2010 to Janua ry 2011 were c onsidered as und er:
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
15/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 15 of 50
S.No Stations Aug -10 Sep -10 Oc t-10 Nov- 10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Average
1 TTPS 92.45 90.50 87 59 83.76 87.74 87.15 73.60
2 Korb a STPS 83.24 80.02 73.53 92.91 81.66 90.87 83.71
3 Sipa t-ll 107.80 129.40 97.61 82.82 71.36 66.65 92.61
4 Riha nd -I 140.99 167.74 122.56 127.47 120.87 117.21 132.815 Sing rauli STPS 138.04 136.45 137.15 132.13 132.85 144.90 136.92
6 Vlndhyanchal-ll
144.04 154.12 126.97 134.31 127.62 141.80 138.14
7 Vindhyanchal-lll
144.04 154.12 126.97 134.31 127.62 141.80 138.14
8 Riha nd -ll 146.84 172.95 128.63 133.81 127.31 121.44 138.50
9 Vind hya nc ha H 149.29 159.74 131.58 139.19 132.25 146.96 143.17
10 Ta lche r-ll 175.73 146.22 157.12 150.66 149.55 170.81 158.35
11 Ta lche r-I 175.72 164.21 157.12 150.66 149.55 170.80 161.34
12 RamagundamIII 136.94 153.71 178.69 162.75 152.64 187.00 161.96
13 Ramagundaml&ll
196.37 171.97 139.57 149.79 167.62 153.84 163.19
14 Simhadri-I 200.08 183.72 155.75 125.86 146.02 174.57 164.33
15 Tand a 230.56 212.91 191.45 197.26 201.37 192 29 172.26
16 TPS I Expansion 170.40 174.70 180.01 185.80 179.00 180.70 178.44
17 TPS II 185.80 192.10 187.80 186.60 186.60 186.50 187.57
18 Kaha lga on-ll 189.37 210.40 192.52 177.50 184.25 199.95 192.33
19 Uncha ha r-lll 197.91 193.33 197.08 194.22 189.09 187.38 193.17
20 Uncha ha r-ll 198.74 198.02 197.29 193.88 188.78 187.37 194.01
21 TPS I 194.80 195.00 196.00 197.60 195.80 195.80 195.83
22 Uncha ha r-I 198.44 204.21 203.70 195.67 190.73 188.16 196.82
23 Kaha lga on-I 196.20 217.94 199.49 183.86 190.91 207.06 199.24
24 NCTPS-il 245.20 219.20 210.90 202.00 204.50 221.70 217.25
25 NCTPP Oadri 263.86 239.26 230.32 221.78 223.63 247.57 237.74
26 BTPS 354 11 343.77 275.47 294.24 298.98 320.04 255.42
27 Farakk a STPS 306.94 307.35 306.22 289.15 287.37 293.85 298.48
It ma y be seen that the med ian value o f energy c harges of the
coal based stations is 164.33 paise/kWh. Accordingly, it was
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
16/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 16 of 50
proposed that UI rate should be fixed at ` 1.65/ kWh a t 50.00 Hz in
line with earlier method ology.
Simila rly, the energy c ha rges of Ga s/ RLNG/ Liquid fuel based
generating sta tions reg ula ted by CERC for the p eriod Aug ust 2010 to
Janua ry 2011 a re as und er:
Stations Fuel Aug -10 Sep -10 Oc t-10 Nov- 10 Dec- 10 Jan-11 Average
An ta Liq iud 751.59 751.59 751.59 751.59 751.59 803.63 760.26
Gas 249.60 266.96 244.47 264.48 288.95 248.61 260.51
RLNG 371.46 351.19 348.38 359.76 363.70 410.58 367.51
Auriya Liq iud 878.80 887.30 887.30 887.16 887.16 948.39 896.02Gas 242.76 254.72 232.01 238.78 235.13 236.47 239.98
RLNG 471.88 429.53 429.40 437.70 442.70 481.54 448.79
Dadri Liqiud 760.70 760.70 760.70 760.70 760.70 780.34 763.97
Gas 246.53 253.83 242.59 236.79 237.36 238.52 242.60
RLNG 404.97 417.29 418.43 433.34 437 17 492.75 361.13
Kaw as Liq iud 614.25 601.34 601.34 380.44 380.44 695.07 545.48
Gas 212.05 197.45 200.84 190.13 192.52 193.06 197.68
RLNG 265.14 282.86 231.25 238.18 345.17 477.62 306.70
Ga nd ha r Ga s 196.06 195.81 194.00 189.13 190.17 190.92 192.68RLNG 325.45 371.29 315.49 325.81 330.77 452.81 353.60
Kayamkulam
Nap tha 686.54 694.48 711.95 752.59 792.82 841.62 746.67
Farida bad Liqiud 782.66 772.03 772.03 353.83 768.59 772.21 703.56
Gas 210.93 207.75 207.72 207.72 206.26 206.85 207.87
RLNG 357.59 336.27 336.22 336.22 348.77 386.43 350.25
Assam Gas 142.30 146.50 149.90 143.40 144.40 152.10 146.43
Ag arta la Ga s 195.00 198.00 192.80 186.30 186.90 189.50 191.42
It may be seen tha t the highest c ost o f gene ra tion is in c ase of
Auraiya CCGT Sta tion which is 896.02 Pa ise/ kWh. It w as ac c ord ing ly
proposed to keep the UI charges at below 49.7 Hz as 900
paise/kWh.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
17/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 17 of 50
10. The responses to the p rop osed ame nd ment on this p oint was as
under:
(a ) Er. Padamjee t Singh ha s sub mitted tha t the worst p erforming
p lant o f Auriaya (highest SHR) should not b e c onsidered as the
benc hma rk for spec ifying Ma x UI Cha rge.
(b) NLC has submitted that the UI Charge at grid frequency in step
of "Not below 50.0Hz and below 50.01Hz" as` 1.65 /kWh (Median
Value of ene rgy charges of c oa l/ lignite b ased gene ra ting sta tions)
is lesser than e nergy c ha rges of lignite based sta tions a t NLC. This
will not enc ourag e the Sta tion Operato rs to ma inta in gene ra tion to
ma tc h w ith the sc hed ule even a t ra ted freq uenc y of 50.0Hz. The UI
ra te is ec onomic a l only for c oa l based p it end sta tions. To
encourage generators and ensure economic despatch, UI rate
corresponding to rated frequency 50.0 Hz may be raised upwards
to the energy charges of the respective stations. As higher limit of
operating frequency band is being continuously narrowed from
50.5 to 50.2 Hz, UI price vector between 50 Hz to 50.2 Hz should be
ma de m ore a ttrac tive to ma intain gene ra tion a t this level.
(c ) Chha ttisgarh SPTCL and pow er Com pany of Ka rna taka have
submitted tha t inc rea se in UI Cha rges and narrow ing dow n o f grid
freq uenc y would lea d to hike in ra te o f elec tric ity in pow er ma rket.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
18/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 18 of 50
(d ) R2L, MPPTCL, TANGEDCO ha ve sub mitted tha t narrowing down
of the grid frequency has led to steep rise in the UI charges in the
new operating g rid freq uenc y range of 50.2 Hz to 49.7 Hz. They
have also argued that sufficient capacity addition has not taken
p lac e d ue to d elay in exec ution of 11th p lan p rojec ts.
(e) MSEDCL has submitted tha t the g rid ha s bee n op erat ing a t an
improved frequency during 2010-11 and there has not been any
major grid security problem during these years and therefore, the
Commission should continue with the existing UI rates and may levy
add itiona l pena l c harges on utilities without tightening the o perating
freq uenc y b and to further ensure the grid sec urity.
(f) KPTCL ha s sub mitted tha t for 0.1 Hz reduc tion in frequenc y,
penalty works out to ` 4.091/kWh, which is a very huge burden on
c onstituents in view of c oa l shortag e and delay in upc om ing
generation projects like Kundamkulam, Neyveli Exp-II and other
projects in central sectors. The existing UI charges may be
continued till the coal problem is solved and commissioning of
p rop osed p rojec ts.
11. We have c onsidered the ob jec tions and suggestions of thestakeholders. No one has objected to the UI Charge as Zero at grid
frequency of 50.2 Hz and above to discourage generators to over
injec t into the grid , or the b ene fic ia ries or buyer to under draw from
the g rid. As regards the sub mission o f Er Padamjeet Singh, it is
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
19/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 19 of 50
reitera ted that the c ommerc ia l mec hanism UI has been p rovided to
ensure grid discipline and it is desirable that under condition of grid
d istress, every b it of a va ilab le g enerat ion should be fed into the g rid .
Therefo re, it is nec essa ry tha t even the c ostly p lant generates power
a t very low g rid freq uenc y c ond itions, irrespec tive of its efficienc y. In
view of this, we would like to continue with the existing practice of
specifying max UI charge corresponding to highest cost of
genera tion which is from Aura iya GPS. As rega rds the sub mission o f
NLC, it is clarified that all coal/lignite based stations are not
nec essarily genera ting a t 50.0 Hz. For setting the UI p rices a t the g rid
frequency of "50.2 Hz and above" as Zero, UI Charge at grid
freq uenc y in step of "Not below 50.0Hz and below 50.01Hz" as` 1.65
/ kWh (Med ian Va lue of energy c harges of c oa l/ lignite based
gene ra ting sta tions) a nd UI Cha rge a t g rid freq uenc y in step of "Not
below 49.80Hz and below 49.81Hz" as ` 4.50 /kWh, the same
method olog y has been a dop ted whic h wa s ad op ted in setting the
UI p ric es ea rlier. The same me thod ology has been a dop ted for
specifying these UI Charges. As regards the submission that
narrow ing dow n of freq uenc y band and inc rea se in UI p ric es has led
to increase in the price in the power market, it is clarified that the
incentive/disincentive mechanisms introduced through UI aim to
ad just the d rawa l/ injec tion to take c are o f grid sec urity on rea ltime
basis. On the other hand, power is traded on a day ahead basis in
the PX and on days, weeks or months ahead basis in the case of
elec tric ity transac ted through traders. The rate o f elec tric ity in the
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
20/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 20 of 50
power market depends upon the demand supply scenario in the
rea l time . Therefore, the UI ra te w ould no t ha ve m uc h effec t on the
pric e in the powe r ma rket. Tab le 1 and Tab le 2 be low g ive the
volume a nd p ric e of elec tric ity traded on the pow er exc hang es and
through traders. It can be seen that the rate of electricity in power
ma rket ha s rema ined low as c ompared to the high ma x UI c harge.
Tab le-1: Volum e of Elec tric ity Transac ted through Trade rs & Power Exc hang es
Yea r Elec tric ity Transac ted throug htrading Licensees (BUs)
Elec tricity Transac ted throug h IEXand PXIL (Day Ahea d Ma rket &
Term A head Ma rket ) (BUs)
2008-09 21.92 2.77
2009-10 26.72 7.19
2010-11 27.70 15.52
2011-12 (Apr-Oct2011) 23.86 9.68
Note 1: The vo lume o f elec tric ity transac ted through trad ing lic ensees in 2008-09 (Ap ril to
July 2008) inc ludes cross border trading and intra-sta te trad ing vo lume.
Tab le- 2: Price of Elec tricity Transac ted through Traders & Power Exc hanges
Yea r Price of Elec tric ity transac ted
throug h Trading Licensees
(`/ kWh)
Price of Elec tric ity transac ted
throug h Power Exc hang es
(DAM+TAM) (`/ kWh)
2008-09 7.29 7.49
2009-10 5.26 4.96
2010-11 4.79 3.47
2011-12 (Apr-Oct2011) 4.09 3.51
12. Ca pac ity add itions during the p lans a re as under:
Plan / Financ ial year Ca pa c ity (MW) Ca pa c ity Ad dition(MW)
End of 6th Plans(31.03.85) 42585
End of 7th Plan (31.03.90) 63636 21052
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
21/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 21 of 50
End of 2 yearly Plans(31.03.92) 69065 5429
End of 8th Plan (31.03.97) 85795 16730
End of 9th Plan (31.03.02) 105046 19251
End of 10th Plan (31.03.2007) 132329 27283
NOVEMBER. 11 185497 53167
It is evident that there is substantial capacity addition during the
11th plan of the order of 53167 MW by November 2011 despite
slippages which is much higher than the capacity additions in otherplan periods. A sizeable capacity is expected to be commissioned
by the end of the financial year 2011-12. We expect that the
prevailing problem of coal shortage would be overcome in due
c ourse w ith the imp ort of c oa l. Apart from above, lot o f capac ity is
being tied up in c ase-I and c ase-II c om petitive b idd ing routes and a
lot of merchant capacity is coming up as discussed in theexplanatory memorandum to the draft amendments. We do not
agree w ith sub mission o f KPTCL rega rd ing the shortfa ll in capac ity
add ition. The Commission is of the view tha t it is the right time to
narrow down the grid frequency band further as proposed in the
d ra ft amend ment to the IEGC.
13. In the exp lanato ry memo randum to the d ra ft amendment,
elaborate reasoning for narrowing of operating grid frequency
range from 50.2-49.5Hz to 50.2-49.7Hz have been given which are
not repeated for the sake of brevity. In line with the methodology
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
22/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 22 of 50
adopted till now, the maximum UI charge of` 9.00 per unit should
be a pp lic ab le a t grid freq uenc y be low 49.7 Hz with the narrow ing o f
the grid frequency so that all available generation is available at
49.7 Hz grid frequency. Earlier the maximum UI charge was
applicable at grid frequency of 49.5 Hz thereby prompting
generation from the costliest power plant. It is a fact that there is
substantial increase in UI Charges from the earlier UI charges in the
grid frequency range of 50.2-49.7 Hz as per the proposed UI price
vector in the draft amendment. We are also conscious that there is
improvement in the grid frequency and over drawls have been
reduced. Considering these factors and having regard to the
concerns of the beneficiaries, the Commission is of the view that UI
p ric e vec tor should b e d esigned in suc h a w ay that the m aximum UI
c harge of`9.00/ kWh is ma de a pp lic ab le a t g rid freq uenc y of b elow
49.5 Hz instead of 49.7 Hz. However, there is a risk that the
beneficiaries may continue to over draw below 49.7 Hz and it may
not turn out to b e a deterrent and it ma y be d iffic ult to enforc e the
operating grid freq uenc y band . The Co mmission is therefo re, of the
view that in order to enforce the grid discipline and ensure that the
grid frequency remains between 50.2-49.7 Hz, additional UI charge
should be made applicable at 20% of the maximum UI charges
below grid freq uenc y of 49.7 Hz and up to 49.5 Hz. The c onduc t o f
bene fic ia ries sha ll be w atc hed and if it is found tha t the b ene fic ia ries
are resorting to grid indiscipline and overdrawing power
indiscriminately, then the Commission may apply the maximum UI
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
23/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 23 of 50
c harge of` 9.00/ kWh a t g rid freq uenc y b elow 49.7 Hz.
Reduc tion of Step size from 0.02 Hz to 0.01 Hz
14. The d ra ft a mend me nts to the UI Reg ula tions a lso p rov ided for
reducing the step size from 0.02 Hz to 0.01 Hz in the UI price Vector.
With regards to this proposed change, the stakeholders have
sub mitted as follows:
(a ) POSOCO ha s submitted tha t the frequenc y step is p rop osed to
be c hanged from 0.02Hz to 0.01Hz, and ac tions a re being ta ken by
CTU to p roc ure Spec ia l Energy Me ters with new spec ific a tion.
Proc urem ent , insta lla tion, testing and va lida tion ma y take some time
and hence some provisions are required for interim period between
notification of the amendment Regulations and data receipt from
new meters. Till the c ommissioning of new meters and tria l op erat ion,
a sep ara te UI ra te tab le w ith 0.02 Hz step size m ay be ind ic a ted .
(b) Pow er Comp any of Karna taka has subm itted tha t ea c h step in
new 0.01 Hz ma y be d iffic ult in opera tion and mo nitoring .
(c ) NTPC has sub mitted tha t the Commission should c onsider toreta in the higher frequenc y interva l (0.02Hz) for UI ra tes. Alte rna tively,
a small dead band of say 0.1 Hz may be considered at the two
thresholds for applying additional UI, which will provide a small
cushion to tide over uncertainties. Additional UI may be applied
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
24/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 24 of 50
below 49.6 Hz up to 49.4 Hz and below 49.4 Hz respec tively. This may
app ly to b oth over d rawls and unde r injec tion.
(d ) NRPC ha s submitted tha t in terms of pa ra 1(b)(i) of pa rt-II of
Sc hedule to the Centra l Elec tric ity Authority (Insta lla tion and
Operation of Meters) Regulations, 2006, the resolution of inter-face
meters ought to be 0.02Hz.
15. It has been explained in the explana tory memo randum to the
draft amendments to the UI regulation that it is desirable to specifythe UI charges in the step size of 0.01 Hz due to narrowing of
op erating g rid freq uenc y range. How eve r, POSOCO ha s ind ic a ted
tha t ac tions a re b eing ta ken by CTU to p roc ure Spec ia l Energy
Meters with new spec ific a tion. Proc urem ent, insta lla tion, testing a nd
va lida tion may take some time. The Ce ntra l Elec tric ity Authority
(Installation and Operation of Meters) Regulations, 2006 also do notprovide for installation of SEM of resolution of 0.01 Hz. Under the
c irc umstanc es, we d irec t the CTU and the POSOCO to take up the
issue of amendment of Central Electricity Authority (Installation and
Opera tion o f Mete rs) Regulations, 2006 with CEA. Till the sa id
reg ula tion is amended , CTU is advised to take ac tion for the
insta lla tion o f SEM mete rs of 0.01 Hz resolution. Afte r CTU ha s
c ompleted the insta lla tion o f suc h SEMs, CTU/ POSOCO may inform
the same to the Commission for notifying the UI price vector
c onforming to the step size o f 0.01 Hz and the da te of its c om ing into
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
25/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 25 of 50
effec t. Till suc h time, the Co mmission has dec ided to spec ify UI p ric e
vec tor in step size of 0.02 Hz. Ac c ord ing ly, the UI Pric e Vec to r sha ll be
as fo llows:
Averag e Freq uenc y of the t ime bloc k(Hz) UI Rate
Below Not Below (Pa ise per kWh)
50.20 0.00
50.20 50.18 16.50
50.18 50.16 33.00
50.16 50.14 49.50
50.14 50.12 66.0050.12 50.10 82.50
50.10 50.08 99.00
50.08 50.06 115.50
50.06 50.04 132.00
50.04 50.02 148.50
50.02 50.00 165.00
50.00 49.98 193.50
49.98 49.96 222.00
49.96 49.94 250.50
49.94 49.92 279.00
49.92 49.90 307.50
49.90 49.88 336.00
49.88 49.86 364.50
49.86 49.84 393.00
49.84 49.82 421.50
49.82 49.80 450.00
49.80 49.78 478.13
49.78 49.76 506.25
49.76 49.74 534.38
49.74 49.72 562.50
49.72 49.70 590.63
49.70 49.68 618.75
49.68 49.66 646.88
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
26/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 26 of 50
UI Cap Rates
16. The draft amendments a lso prop osed fo r rev iew o f UI c ap ra tes
due to c hange in the UI p ric e vec tor. The revised UI Ca p ra tes
proposed were as follows:
a .407.25 Paise/kWh for all generating stations using coal orlignite or gas supplied under Administered Price
Mec ha nism (APM) a s the fue l
b . 450.0 Pa ise/ kWh for the under d rawls by the buyer or the
beneficiaries in excess of 10% of the schedule or 250 MW,
whic heve r is less.
c .450.0 Pa ise/ kWh for the injec tion by the seller in e xc ess of
120% of the schedule subject to a limit of ex-bus
generation corresponding to 105% of the Installed
Capacity of the station in a time block and 101% of the
Installed Ca pac ity over a d ay.
d .165.00 Pa ise/ kWh for the injec tion b y a generat ing sta tion
other than the hydro generating station in excess of 105%
49.66 49.64 675.00
49.64 49.62 703.13
49.62 49.60 731.25
49.60 49.58 759.38
49.58 49.56 787.50
49.56 49.54 815.63
49.54 49.52 843.75
49.52 49.50 871.88
49.50 900.00
(Eac h 0.02 Hz step is eq uiva lent to 16.50 Pa ise/ kWh in the 50.2-50.00 Hz frequenc y range, 28.50 Pa ise/ kWh in 50 Hz to 49.8 Hz and28.12 Paise/kwh in frequency in the below 49.8 Hz to 49.5 Hzrange.)
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
27/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 27 of 50
of the Dec la red Ca pac ity of the station in a time b loc k or
in excess of 101% of the a verag e Dec la red Ca pac ity over
a da y.
e.165.00 Pa ise/ kWh for the injec tion by the seller in exc ess of
ex-bus generation corresponding to 105% of the Installed
Capacity of the station in a time block or 101% of the
Installed Ca pac ity over a day
17. The responses to the p rop osed amendment were as und er:
(a ) NTPC has sub mitted tha t the Cap ra te of 407.25 Pa ise/ kWh /
(based on Energy charges of Farakka `. 3/ kWh) is less as Ene rgy
charges of Farakka has increased substantially (average 374.3
P/ unit). In view of shorta ge of c oa l, this may further inc rease. NTPC
has suggested that Unscheduled Interchange Cap Rate may be
spec ified as 490.91Ps/ kWh, correspond ing to the freq uenc y interva l
below 49.80 Hz and not below 49.79 Hz, considering the increase in
Energy Cha rge Rate.
(b) CEA ha s submitted tha t the UI c ap ra te for under d rawl in exc ess
of 10% of the sc hed ule should no t be m ore tha n`. 2.5 per unit and
seller injection in access of 120% of the schedule should also be
kep t to`. 2.5 per unit.
18. We ha ve c onsidered the sub missions of NTPC a nd CEA. As
rega rd s the sub mission o f NTPC, w e a re of the view tha t there is still
sufficient margin available even with higher energy charge due to
imported coal blending. However, on the UI Price vector the Cap
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
28/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 28 of 50
rate is working out as 421.50 Paise/kWh. In view of this, the Cap rate
of 407.25 Pa ise/ kWh fo r a ll genera ting sta tions using c oa l or lignite o r
gas supp lied und er Administered Pric e Mec hanism (APM) a s the fuel
may now be raised to 421.50 Pa ise/ kWh. The c ap ra te for the
und erdrawls by the buyer or the benefic ia ries in exc ess of 10% of the
schedule or 250 MW, whichever is less and for the injection by the
seller in excess of 120% of the schedule, subject to a limit of ex-bus
generation corresponding to 105% of the Installed Capacity of the
station in a time block and 101% of the Installed Capacity over a
day, may be reta ined as 450.0 Pa ise/ kWh. There has been suffic ient
inc entive to support the g rid .
19. Ame ndme nt has a lso been prop osed to spec ify the grid
frequency for operation of limit of UI Volume from 49.7 Hz to 49.8 Hz.
There a re no spec ific c om ments of the stakeholders in this reg ard . In
our view, it would be necessary to revise the grid frequency for
operation limit of UI volume in view of narrowing of operating grid
frequency range.
Revision o f Additiona l UI Charges
20. The Ad d itiona l UI Charges were a lso rev iew ed and follow ing
add itiona l UI c harges were p rop osed in the d ra ft am end ment:
For over drawal below 49.7 Hz and up to 49.5 Hz -40% of the
Unsc heduled Interc hange Cha rge o f 900.0 Pa ise/ kWh
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
29/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 29 of 50
For und er-injec tion b elow 49.7 Hz and up to 49.5 Hz-
20% of the Unscheduled Interchange Charge of 900.0
Pa ise/ kWh
20% of the UI Cap Ra te of 407.25 Pa ise/ kWh for the
generating stations using coal or lignite or gas supplied
und er Administered Pric e Mec ha nism (APM)
For over drawals below 49.5 Hz - 100% of the UI Charge 900.0
Pa ise/ kWh
For under-injec tion below 49.5 Hz
40% of the UI Cha rge of 900.0 Pa ise/ kWh 40% of the UI Cap Ra te of 407.25 Pa ise/ kWh for the
generating stations using coal or lignite or gas supplied
und er Administered Pric e Mec hanism (APM)
21. In response to the p rop osed amendme nt, the follow ing
responses have b een rec eived :
(a ) NTPC ha s submitted tha t the generat ing sta tions may be
exempted from additional UI charge in case of forced outages till
the revision of declared capacity/injection schedule after unit
tripping.
(b) Torrent Pow er and GMR Energy Ltd ., have sub mitted tha t the
pena lty or add itiona l UI should not be imp osed on STOA g enerators
and that any additional UI charges should not be imposed for start-
up pow er of plant d uring the testing period .
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
30/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 30 of 50
(c ) BSES ha s sub mitted tha t the add itiona l UI for d isc oms should be
20 % and 40 % aga inst 40 % and 100 %.
(d ) UPPCL has submitted tha t the add itiona l UI c ha rges a re imposed
as pena lty in d isc riminato ry manner and it should b e withdrawn.
(e) Gujra t Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) ha s sub mitted tha t
charging of additional UI at the rate of 40% of UI rate (`9/unit) for
frequency below 49.7 Hz up to 49.5 Hz is wider band where Discoms/
beneficiaries will start getting instant trouble once frequency
desc end s immed ia te ly below 49.7 Hz and this troub le p ersists for over
d raw ing p ow er at rate of`. 12.60 / unit for frequenc y band 49.7-49.5
Hz. GUVNL has submitted that the Commission may divide this long
band into two parts i.e. 49.7-49.6 Hz & 49.6-49.5 Hz and apply 20% of
UI ra te (`9/unit) for freq uenc y below 49.7 up to 49.6 Hz and then 40%
of UI rate (` 9/unit) fo r freq uenc y below 49.6 up to 49.5 Hz. This will
p rovide suffic ient signa l to the ove r-d rawing entity to p roc ure p ow er
from ma rket. The a bove p rop osa l w ill a lso b e e noug h to w a rn the
ove rdrawing entity not to ove rd raw further when freq uenc y is further
deteriorating . Simila rly, c ha rg ing of a dd itiona l UI for freq uenc y below
49.5 Hz may be divided into two parts i.e. 49.5-49.2 Hz & below 49.2
Hz and 70% of UI rate (`. 9 /unit) may be applied for frequency
below 49.5 up t 49.2 Hz and then 100% of UI rate (` 9 /unit) for
freq uenc y below 49.2 Hz. The above submission of cha rg ing
additional UI for overdrawing of power is in light of the various facts
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
31/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 31 of 50
like loa d shedd ing b y Utilities/ Disc oms, Transmission c orridor p rob lem,
Power evacuation strengthening/up-gradation and for
develop ment of p ower ma rket.
(f) KPTCL has sub mitted tha t the pena l ra tes when freq uenc y is
below 49.7 Hz and up to 49.5 Hz, wo rks out to be`. 12.6/ - and below
49.5 Hz, it is`. 18.0/ - and the existing pena l ra tes for freq uenc y below
49.5 and up to 49.2 Hz`. 12.222/- and for frequency below 49.2 Hz
the ra tes a re`. 17.46/ -. There is hug e a c c umula tion o f pena l c ha rges
with RPCs due to levy of high penal charges for over drawing
constituents and under injecting generators whereas payment for
ove r injec tion by genera tors for both C GS and othe rs a re pa id very
less. Instead of this, levying of penal charges may be reduced for
overdrawing constituents and under injecting generators and
ba lanc e the c an b e a chieved.
22. The a dd itiona l UI c ha rges have b ee n provided to d issuade the
beneficiaries and the buyers to overdraw from the grid when grid is
under distressed c ond ition. We ag a in reitera te tha t the b ene fic ia ries
are under no compulsion to overdraw from the grid. If they adhere
to their respective schedules, then there would be no UI liability or
any ad d itiona l UI liab ility ac c ruing to them w hateve r ma y be the g rid
condition. As discussed earlier in para 13 above, we have decided
to impose additional UI charges at 20% of Max UI Charge of `
9.00/kWh corresponding to the grid frequency of "below 49.5 Hz" for
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
32/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 32 of 50
overdrawal in the frequency range. In view of this, Additional UI
c ha rges "below 49.5 Hz" ha s a lso been review ed . The Commission
has decided to continue with the existing additional UI charges
"below49.5 Hz and up to 49.2 Hz" and below 49.2 Hz.
23. Ac c ording ly, follow ing add itiona l UI c ha rges have been
specified:
For over drawal below 49.7 Hz and up to 49.5 Hz -20% of the
Unsc heduled Interc hange Cha rge o f 900.0 Pa ise/ kWh
For und er-injec tion b elow 49.7 Hz and up to 49.5 Hz-
10% of the Unscheduled Interchange Charge of 900.0
Pa ise/ kWh
10% of the UI Cap Ra te of 421.50 Pa ise/ kWh for the
generating stations using coal or lignite or gas supplied
und er Administered Pric e Mec ha nism (APM)
For over d rawa ls below 49.5 Hz and up to 49.2 Hz - 40% of the UICha rge 900.0 Pa ise/ kWh
For und er-injec tion b elow 49.5 Hz and up to 49.2 Hz
20% of the UI Cha rge of 900.0 Pa ise/ kWh
20% of the UI Cap Ra te of 407.25 Pa ise/ kWh for the
generating stations using coal or lignite or gas supplied
und er Administered Pric e Mec hanism (APM)
For over drawals below 49.2 Hz - 100% of the UI Charge 900.0
Pa ise/ kWh For under-injec tion below 49.2 Hz
40% of the UI Cha rge of 900.0 Pa ise/ kWh
40% of the UI Cap Ra te of 407.25 Pa ise/ kWh for the
generating stations using coal or lignite or gas supplied
und er Administered Pric e Mec hanism (APM)
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
33/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 33 of 50
24. This would take c are of the conc ern of the stakeholders ha ving
regard to their conduct leading to improvement in the grid
frequency. However, if the Commission finds in future that
stakeholders are resorting to grid indiscipline, then the Commission
may review its decision and may impose higher additional UI
c ha rges below 49.7 Hz grid freq uenc y.
UI Cap for injec tion of Infirm Power
25. The p roposed amendments a lso introd uc ed UI Ca p ra tes for
injection of infirm power for generating units for testing and
c om missioning b efore COD of units dep end ing up on the type of fuel
used for power generation. It was proposed that infirm power
injected into the grid by a generator which has not identified abuyer for the infirm power during the testing prior to COD of units/
station from other generating stations shall be paid at UI rates for
pow er injec ted in to the g rid c onseq uent to testing for a period not
exceeding 3 months, subject to ceiling of Cap rates corresponding
to the fuel used for suc h g ene ra tion as spec ified in the Sc hed ule A
of this Reg ula tion. The follow ing UI c ap ra tes were p roposed inSc hedule A to the d ra ft amend ment:
Domestic c oa l : ` 1.65 / kWh sent o ut
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
34/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 34 of 50
APM gas as fuel : ` 2.60 / kWh sent o ut
Imp orted Coa l/ RLNG : ` 3.30/ kWh sent out
Liquid Fue l : ` 9.00 / kWh sent o ut
It was also provided that in case imported coal is being
blended with the domestic coal then the ceiling rate of infirm
power shall be arrived at in proportion to the ratio of blending
based on the above rates of domestic and imported coal and
shall be subject to a further ceiling of` 1.90 / kWh ex-bus. It was
a lso p rovide d tha t in c ase the g ene ra ting sta tion uses na tura l gas
supplied under Administrative Price Mechanism (APM), Re-
gassified Liquid Natural Gas (RLNG) and Liquid fuel in combination
for power generation, then the ra te of infirm pow er sha ll be a rrived
a t in p rop ortion to the ra tio of fuel c onsump tion based on the ra tes
spe c ified abo ve.
26. The a bove p rovisions we re p rovide d in view of the amend me nt
of the clause 7 of Regulation 8 of Central Electricity Regulatory
Co mm ission (Grant o f Connec tivity, Long-Term Ac c ess and Med ium-
Term Op en Ac c ess in Inte r-Sta te Transmission and rela ted ma tte rs]
Reg ula tions 2009 (hereinafter refrerred to as Co nnec tivity
Regulations) which provide for limit on the period for injection of
infirm power in to the grid for the purpose of testing/ Commissioning
of the units and to trea t suc h infirm pow er injec tion as UI and to be
paid at UI rates subject to ceiling of UI Cap rates as specified in UI
Reg ula tion. Therefo re, d ra ft a mendments to the UI Reg ula tion
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
35/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 35 of 50
introduced the UI Cap rates for injection of infirm power for
generating units for testing before COD based on fuel used for
power generation.
27. The Co mmission has dec ided a maximum period of six month
for which injec tion o f infirm p ow er c an be permitted before the d ate
of c om merc ia l op eration. The d eta iled rea sons are g iven in the
Sta tem ent o f Rea sons for the sec ond ame ndment to the Connec tivity
Regulat ions. Therefore, the c omments of stakeholders in response to
simila r provision in d ra ft UI reg ula tions have not been repea ted .
28. With reg ard to the UI Ca p ra tes for injec tion of infirm power for
generating units for testing before COD based on fuel used for
pow er gene ra tion, the stakeholders have c om me nted as follow s:
(a ) Hindustan Elec tric ity Generation Co . Pvt. Ltd . has submitted tha t
presently RLNG in India is benchmarked with JCC at around 14.5%
slop e. The p reva iling ma rket rate for RLNG is a round $18 land ed per
mmBtu. Also no Gas based Generator has tied up long term gas
supply agreements due to high volatility in the RLNG prices. It has
been submitted that a mechanism should be devised in order to
capture such cases of high price of fuel cost keeping in mind the
vo la tility in the RLNG market.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
36/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 36 of 50
(b ) Southern Reg iona l Power Comm ittee ha s submitted the
following:
i) A new sentence may please be added that for UI
computation generator shall furnish the blending ratio by
Thursday for the past week to RPC Sec reta ria t. If the b lend ing
ratio is not communicated, then the ceiling rate would be
restric ted to 1.65/ kWh .(Rate for do mestic c oa l/ gas)
ii) A new sentence may please be added that for UI
computation generator shall furnish the ratio of fuel
c onsumption by Thursday for the past wee k to RPC Sec reta ria t.
If the ra tio o f fuel c onsump tion is not c om munica ted , then the
ceiling rate would be restricted to 2.60/kWh. (rate for APM
gas as fuel)
(c) Power Company of Karnataka has submitted that the GCV &
Cost considered for arrival of the rate is not specified. In case of
generators selected under competitive bidding route, based on
levelised tariff, the recovery of short fuel cost is not possible, since
quoted tariff shall remain for 25 years. Under such circumstances
fac to ring of c ost in the ta riff does no t a rise. Therefore it is suggested
that the a c tual cost p ayment o r ma ximum c eiling ra te, whic hever is
low er sha ll be c onsidered . The p erce ntage o f fuel and GCV
considered for arrival of` 1.90/kWh as ceiling rate is not specified
which may be required for calculation of rate in case of different
ra tio o f b lend ing of c oa l used for infirm p ow er.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
37/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 37 of 50
(d) NHPC has submitted that nothing has been mentioned in the
clause regarding the rate of infirm power from hydro generating
stations. It needs to be confirmed that rate of infirm power for hydro
sta tions will be app lic ab le UI ra te.
(d ) NTPC has sub mitted tha t the energy injec ted as infirm pow er is
proposed to have different UI price ceiling rates depending on fuel.
Looking from the point of view of the recipients of such power,
differential price does not make sense. Moreover, the cost of suchtesting is an antic ipa ted expend iture o f the generato r and p aying UI
rate for the same is not justified. In fact one could also argue the
cost of such testing should be borne entirely by the generator. A
common ceiling rate corresponding to the UI rate for the frequency
band of 49.98-50.00Hz (` 1.55/kWh) may be adequate as the
generator has no imp lic a tion of nega tive UI. The intent o f de c la ringcommercial operation is that as soon as generator is reasonably
ready to inject power, it should declare its COD and sell the power
through commercial mechanisms. Infirm power should only be
allowed for making generator ready for COD. It should not be used
as a side mechanism to get additional commercial gains. But
because a generator is injecting power into the grid which shall be
utilized by customer, it may be compensated, but this should not
c rea te a ny motiva tion to generate a dd itiona l c om merc ia l ga ins.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
38/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 38 of 50
(e) LANCO has submitted that in view of severe coal shortage in the
c ountry, som e of the develope rs a re forc ed to use e-auc tion c oa l to
supp lem ent the c oa l req uirem ents. Thoug h e-auc tion c oa l is
indigenous, its rate is almost equal to imported coal. LANCO has
requested to consider this aspect before fixing any ceiling rates for
the infirm p ow er injec ted beyond the a llow ed testing time. How eve r,
it is essentia l to p rov ide more c la rity on ho w the c eiling UI ra te will be
arrived a t in c ase a c om bina tion o f fuels a re used and an authorized
agenc y should b e d esigna ted to c ertify the fuel mix used .
(f) Shree Ceme nt Limited has submitted tha t the p rop osed c ap is
very low as c om pared to the c ost of gene ra tion o f po wer. The
variable cost of power generation based on domestic coal or
imported coal is higher than the cap proposed above. A power
plant injecting infirm power into the grid will be incurring loss if the
payment for such power is below its variable cost of generation,
which in case of imported coal will not be less than ` 3.50/unit
against cap of ` 3.30/ unit p roposed . Though the d ra ft reg ula tion
incorporates provision for different rates based on utilization of
d ifferent fuels, it does not spec ify the mec ha nism for asc erta ining the
actual fuel usage by generators. Many generators are using other
fuels like pet coke, lignite etc. for which no price has been fixed in
the proposed regulations. As such a new category Others should
a lso be inc orpora ted to c a ter to g ene ra tors using d ifferent fuels.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
39/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 39 of 50
(g) MB Power (MP) Ltd. has submitted that in the current scenario,
the fuel price is determined by the market forces which are very
dynam ic and volatile in nature. Therefore, to p rovide a c eiling on the
rates of infirm power based on various fuels does not appear to be
prudent and realistic, and it may cause the project developers
substantial financial losses. MB POWER has submitted that instead of
capping the rates of infirm power, fuel cost should be allowed as a
100% pass through for the purpose of calculation of rates of infirm
pow er. In this ma nner, there w ill be no inc entive on the gene ra tor to
prolong this testing period, however, at the same time; it will not be
penalized in the event the actual fuel consumption charges are
recovered. An appropriate mechanism may be devised to
determine the actual fuel costs incurred, for example, audited
statement certified by the equipment supplier/EPC contractor or
other engineer conducting the tests and invoices duly certified by
the sta tutory aud itor of the gene ra tor.
(h) Neyve li Lignite Co rporation Limited has submitted tha t the sa le of
infirm pow er a t UI ra te simp lifies the c omme rc ia l mec hanism, sinc e it
will not interfere with REA computations. However, if the Commission
feels that injection of infirm power for long periods is because of
attractive UI rates, the UI rate may be replaced with Energy Cost of
respec tive sta tions for ge nera torswho have not identified purc hasers
with a pprop ria te amendme nt to Reg ula tions 11 of Ce ntra l Elec tric ity
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
40/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 40 of 50
Regulato ry Co mmission (Terms and Cond itions of Ta riff) Regulations,
2009, if wa rranted .
(i) Torrent Pow er has submitted tha t the c ap ra te for domestic gas
should b e inc rea sed to 2.60/ kwh sent out. The c ap ra te for pit head
generating station and non-pithead station should be different,
hence, the rate of ` 1.65/kwh would be for pithead generating
sta tion a nd for non-p it hea d gene ra ting sta tion, the c ap ra te should
be inc rea sed to the e xtent o f ac tual transportation c ost inc urred per
kwh. The c ap ra te p resc ribed for imported RLNG is a lso very low
compared to the actual variable cost and therefore, it should be
inc rea sed to a t lea st`5/ kwh sent o ut.
(j) Adani Power Limited (AEL) has submitted that during high
freq uenc y c ond itions, the g enerator would not b e a b le to rec over its
fuel cost from UI charges and hence will have to make up for this
revenue loss with the help of UI charges during low frequency
conditions. Also, the cost of fuel for infirm energy will be very high
owing to poor station heat Rate during stabilization period. Now,
app lying c ap on UI c harges for injec tion o f infirm p ow er would b e a n
injustice to the genuine generators. Hence, AEL has suggested to
reta in the c urrent p rov ision related to set tlem ent o f injec tion of infirm
pow er in to the g rid .
(k) CEA has suggested that Cap Rates for infirm power injected
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
41/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 41 of 50
during testing p rior to CoD of the unit have been spec ified . How eve r,
no Ca p Rate has been spec ified for hydro gene ra ting units injec ting
infirm pow er. It mea ns tha t Hydro gene ra ting sta tions c an earn up to
` 4.50/unit as per Clause 2(c). It has been submitted that the
Commission may specify Cap Rates for infirm power injection by
hydro generating stations prior to CoD. In this connection, CEA has
c ited the instanc es of Unit-3 of Jayp ee e Ka rc ha m Wang too HEP and
Unit-1 and Unit-2 of Ma lana II HEP which ha ve been sync hronised but
have not declared commercial operation. CEA has suggested that
UI Cap Rate for infirm injection by hydro stations prior to CoD should
be capped a t` 1.65/unit.
(l) POSOC O has submitted tha t to d isc ourage injec tion of infirm
pow er for p rolong ed period , and to ta ke c are o f infirm na ture o f the
injection, UI rate for all generating stations/sellers (irrespective of
type/source of fuel) prior to COD may be capped at the rate
c orrespond ing to freq uenc y of 50 Hz. whic h, as per prop osed UI ra te
is equivalent to ` 1.65. A uniform cap rate for infirm power is also
nec essa ry from the stakeho lders perspec tive. POSOCO has further
submitted that after the generator has declared COD, it is possible
tha t it ha s a Long Term Ac c ess (LTA) to the Inter Sta te Transmission
System (ISTS) b ut no long te rm PPA. Under suc h situa tion, it is possible
that the ge nera tor c ontinues to injec t UI and ge t pa id for a t norma l
rates. In that case, the generators may declare COD of their units
right from day one of synchronization and continue to inject under
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
42/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 42 of 50
UI. It has been suggested that this issue be addressed in the UI
Regulations possibly by specifying a cap rate, which provides
sufficient incentive for harnessing available generation and at the
same time d isc ourages c ontinued injec tion under UI.
29. The C om mission is of the view tha t it would not be feasib le to
specify one ceiling rate for all types of fuel and therefore, ceiling
rates as proposed shall be adopted. No ceiling rate was specified
for the hydro gene ra ting sta tions and in our view , the c eiling ra te for
the hydro generating station shall be ` 165 Paise/kWh, the same as
for the c oa l/ lignite ba sed generating sta tion. The Com mission a lso
find s merit in the c ontention o f CEA a nd SRPC with regard to the
c onc ern ab out d ec id ing the b lend ing ra tio a nd its verific a tion. The
Commission is of the view that it is possible for the generator to
arrange suffic ient quantity of m a in fuel like d om estic c oa l or natural
gas for the purpose of testing and commissioning activities and as
suc h, there ma y not b e a ny nec essity of b lend ing of imp orted c oa l
or mixing o f gas with RLNG or the liquid fuel for the purpose o f testing
and commissioning. As such, provision relating to blending of
imported coal and mixing of gas with RLNG or the liquid fuel for the
purpose o f testing and c om missioning ha s been d one awa y with. It is
also not feasible to allow actual variable cost as it would not be
possible for the Commission to determine it for the merchant
generators.
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
43/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 43 of 50
30. As rega rds the c onc ern of POSOCO , it is c la rified tha t it has
been clearly provided in Connectivity Regulations that mere
connectivity shall not entitle any entity to interchange power with
the grid without seeking open access and as such, a generator has
to obtain some form of access after the COD to inject power into
the g rid .
Inter-Regional UI adjustment and Sharing of Inter Regional UI
charges
31. Eastern Regiona l Load Despa tc h Centre (ERLDC) has sub mitted
that from 2003 till 3.5.2010, settlement of UI between two
asynchronously connected regions was being computed at
respec tive reg iona l UI ra te. However, w ith fo rma tion of NEW Grid , the
only async hrono us op eration was betw een the Southe rn a nd NEW
Grid throug h HVDC Links between SR and ER, and SR and WR. Due to
the na ture of async hrono us inter-c onnec tion betw een Southern Grid
and NEW Grid , a d ifferential UI was being g ene ra ted and the same
was being credited to the inter-regional exchange (IRE) pool
ac c ount w hic h wa s shared betw een the respec tive reg ions on 50:50
basis. The benefit so a c c rued was passed on to the bene fic ia ries of
each region in proportion to their liability to pay the transmission
c ha rges. Simila r prac tic e was a lso followed for UI set tlem ent
betwee n ER and NR poo l for exchange betwee n ER and NR till 2006
when NR Grid was op erat ing async hronously w ith rest o f the Grid .
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
44/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 44 of 50
32. Central Elec tric ity Regulatory Commission (Ind ian Elec tric ity
Grid Code) Regulations, 2010 (Grid Code) came into effect from
3.5.2010. Para 16 of Annexure I of the Grid Code dealing with
Comp lem enta ry Comm ercial Mec hanism p rovides as under:
16. Interfaces for Scheduling and UI Accounting In Inter-regional Exchanges:
1. The regional boundaries for scheduling, metering and UI accounting of inter-regional exchanges shall be as follows:
Eastern Region end of inter-regional links between Eastern Region andSouthern, Western and Northern Regions.
North-eastern end of inter-regional links between Eastern and NorthEastern Region Western Region end of inter-regional links between Southern and WesternRegion Western Region end of inter-regional links between and Northern andWestern Region.
2. No attempt shall be made to split the inter-regional schedules into link-wiseschedules (where two regions have two or more interconnections).
33. ERLDC has submitted tha t a fter Grid Co de came into forc e,
SRPC unila tera lly disc ontinued the ea rlier p rac tic e o f computa tion of
inte r-reg iona l UI based on d ifferential frequenc y. ERLDC ha s
submitted that the intent of para 16 of Annexure I to the Grid Code
was to compute energy drawl based only on the energy meter
read ing of Eastern Region or Western Region end s.
34. ERLDC has furthe r sub mitted tha t pa ra 16 of Annexure I does
not bar computation of UI charges at the respective frequencies of
the a sync hronously connec ted reg ions. The d isc ontinuat ion o f the
existing p rac tic e of UI c om puta tion me thod ology b y SRPC was thus
-
7/30/2019 ui charges rates unsheduled inter change charges
45/50
____________________________________________________________________________________SOR to CERC(UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 Page 45 of 50
in contravention of the objective of achieving optimal economic
operation. This was done without a ny d irec tives from the Co mm ission
or intimation to the Commission and without any prior discussions
with o ther RPCs (viz. ERPC or WRPC). Consequently, the d ifferentia l UI
amount is being generated now, instead of being shared on 50:50
basis betw een SR and ER/ WR pools gets entirely c red ited to the SR UI
pool. Suc h lost b enefits for Eastern a nd Western reg iona l
bene fic ia ries with effec t from 3.5.2010 need be c om pensa ted by the
Southern Reg ion w ith ret rospec tive e ffec t. It is apprehended tha t
suc h p rac tic e as unila terally adop ted by SRPC ma y restric t ec ono my
exchanges between ER-SR and WR-SR which is detrimental to
optimal utilization of national resources. ERLDC has submitted that
esse