(UGC Autonomous) Accredited by NAAC with “A+” Grade ...

CMR College of Engineering & Technology(UGC Autonomous)

Accredited by NAAC with “A+” Grade

Kandlakoya, Medchal Road, Hyderabad-501401

Welcome to NBA Expert Team

CMRCET - CSE

Department of Computer Science & EngineeringDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering

Presented by

Dr. Vijaya Kumar Koppula

Professor & HOD-CSE

2

Year of Establishment : 2004

Programs Offered : B.Tech (CSE)

: M.Tech (CSE)

Initial Intake : 60

Intake Increased :120 in 2007,180 in 2011,240 in 2012

Present Intake : 240

Specialization : Computer Science & Engineering

Year of Starting : 2009

Intake : 12

NBA Accreditation : 2014, 2018 B.Tech (CSE)

NAAC Accreditation : ‘A’ Grade, in 2014 ,‘A+’ Grade in 2020

UGC Autonomous : 2014

DEPARTMENT PROFILE

M.TechM.Tech

B.TechB.Tech

AccreditationsAccreditations

3-Dec-21 Department of CSE, CMRCET

FACULTY & SUPPORTING STAFF DETAILS

Faculty Cadre Number of Faculty/ Staff

Professor 4

Associate Professor 13

Assistant Professor 29

Total (Teaching Staff) 46

Non-Teaching Staff 12

3

2021-22


FACULTY ACHIEVEMENTS(2017- 2021)

R & D Projects

Completed - 1

Consultancy Projects

Completed - 8

R & D Projects

Ongoing - 2


Ongoing - 0

R & D

Publications

Journals : 169

Book Chapters : 109

Conferences : 146

Patents (17)

Indexing

SCI : 22

Scopus : 157

GS/WOS : 140

Highest H-Index : 12

Highest Citations : 601

R & D

Ph.D. Awarded: 5Ph.D. Supervising

5

Ph.D. Pursuing

13

Teaching Excellence award : 01

Dewang Mehta award : 01

Uthama Acharya Puraskar : 02

Best Educator award : 01

Ph.D/Awards

NPTEL : 22

Edx : 03

Coursera : 37

IBM : 06

NVIDIA : 04

Professional

Certifications

04

FDP : 553Conferences : 170Workshops : 225

Certifications


STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENTS(2017-2021)

Admissions In National &

International Universities

100

Certifications

EC-Council : 2

Coursera : 294

Microsoft : 05

SCOPUS Indexed Publications

14

Academics

NASA Space APPS– 4

COGNIZANCE, IIT Roorkee -10

Technex Hackthon, IIT

Varanasi- 25

Participations

ACM ICPC-4

Adobe CODEGNAN - 3

Participations

Kickboxing Champion -1

District level Kabaddi

Champions – 1

Competitions

Department of CSE, CMRCET 53-Dec-21

Mahindra Hackathon - 12Codechef Turing CUP - 5

Photography Winners-1

Dance Winners-1

Essay Writing-1

EPAM Null Meet-6

International Taekwondo

Champion -1

TCS CodeVita-05

Smart India Hackathon Competition -4

Hackathon@vesAIthon-19

CISCO Codathon -2

1st place awardee in

Smart India

Hackathon-2019

University Level Cricket

Champions - 1

CSI Seminars– 8

Competitions

5

6

Students own the First Prize at IIT BHU Techfest

Students own the First Prize at Codathon 2.0

Students own the First Prize in Smart India Hackathon-2019


Student own the Prize in ACM-ICPC 2020

Techie of the Year (Nitesh Goud) won 3 Lakhs prize money

Winners ofHackathon@vesAIthon-19

By leadingindia.ai

7

NCC Candidates

Students 1 week Camp in the village

Bachuraj Pally conducted

Health camp, Blood donation camp, Food

for Needed

Student Won the Prize atInternational taekwondo competition held at Thailand


DEPARTMENT ACHIEVEMENTS

CSI/IEEE

7

FDPs

2020-21 : 10

2019-20 : 8

2018-19 : 8

2017-18 : 8

AZURA – 03

Years: 2018, 2019 &

2020

International

Conferences – 2+1*

ICCIC-2021*

ICACCT-2019

ICACCT-2018

Events

Govt. Sponsored

Projects

110.16 Lakhs

Center of Excellences 4Research Center 1

R&D

No. of MoUs - 18


(Non-Govt)

27 Lakhs

3-Dec-21 Department of CSE, CMRCET 8

CRITERION - 1

VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES


VISION, MISSION & PEO

VISIONTo evolve as a Centre of academic excellence in Computer Science and Engineering by building

strong teaching and research environment.

M

I

S

S

I

O

N

M 1

To offer high quality graduate and post graduate programs in computer science education and to

prepare students for professional career and/or higher studies globally.

M 2 To develop self learning abilities and professional ethics to serve the society.

PEO 1Graduates Excel in their professional career and higher education in Computer Science &

Engineering and chosen fields.

PEO 2 Graduates Demonstrate leadership qualities, team work and Professional ethics to serve the society

PEO 3 Graduates Adapt to state of art technology through continuous learning in the areas of interest.

3-Dec-21 10Department of CSE, CMRCET

PROCESS OF DEFINING VISION, MISSION & PEO’S


Display

Department Webpage

Department Corridor

HOD Chamber

Dept Noticeboard

Central Library

Cafeteria

Sports Room

Publish

College website

Syllabus Books

Lab manuals Course file

Dissemination

Academic Council

Meetings

Department Advisory

Board/Committee meetings

Faculty meetings

Parent-Teacher Meetings

Alumni meetings

Orientation Programme

Student workshops

/Club activities

Professional activity

meetings

CRITERION - 2

PROGRAM CURRICULUM &TEACHING LEARNING

PROCESS


PROCESS FOR DESIGNING THE PROGRAM CURRICULUM

Name of

Program

Program

SpecializationRegulation

B.TechComputer Science and Engineering

R14

R15

R18

CURRICULUM REVISIONS

Batch Regulation2015-19 R-15 AUTONOMOUS–CBCS

2016-20 R-15 AUTONOMOUS–CBCS





ACADEMIC REGULATIONS


SUMMARY & COMPONENTS OF THE CURRICULUM


R15 – Regulation R18 – Regulation AICTE

S. NO Course Work – Subject Area Credits- in % Credits- TotalCredits- in

%Credits-

TotalCredits- in

%Credits-

Total

1 Basic Sciences 12.89 25 14.69 23.5 7.5 12

2 Engineering Sciences 13.40 26 14.38 23 15.62 25

3 Humanities and Social Sciences 9.79 19 6.88 11 15 24

4 Program Core 40.72 79 36.56 58.5 30 48

5 Program Electives 10.31 20 11.25 18 11.25 18

6 Open Electives 4.64 9 7.50 12 11.25 18

7 Project(s) 6.19 12 6.25 10 9.38 158 Internships/Seminars 1.03 2 2.50 4 - -

9 Comprehensive Viva 1.03 2 0 0 - -

10 Mandatory Courses 0 0 0 0 - -

Total number of Credits 100 % 194 100 % 160 100 % 160

Percentage of Courses in Curriculum Contributed to POs & PSOs


PO#&PSO#

R15 R18

High

(in %)

Medium

(in %)

Low

(in %)

Contributed to

POs & PSOs

High

(in %)

Medium

(in %)

Low

(in %)

Contributed to POs & PSOs

PO1 51.47 14.71 33.82 95.77 62.75 13.73 23.53 67.11

PO2 38.46 41.54 20.00 91.55 47.17 39.62 13.21 69.74PO3 52.63 35.09 12.28 80.28 63.04 19.57 17.39 60.53PO4 37.78 46.67 15.56 63.38 32 52 16 32.89

PO5 42.22 26.67 31.11 63.38 35.29 26.47 38.24 44.74

PO6 31.58 36.84 31.58 26.76 30.00 20.00 50.00 13.16

PO7 56.25 6.25 37.50 22.54 54.55 0 45.45 14.47

PO8 42.86 28.57 28.57 19.72 54.55 18.18 27.27 14.47

PO9 23.53 29.41 47.06 23.94 40.00 20.00 40.00 19.74PO10 55.00 25.00 20.00 28.17 66.67 16.67 16.67 23.68PO11 14.29 42.86 42.86 19.72 50.00 25.00 25.00 15.79

PO12 13.11 44.26 42.62 85.92 14.29 38.78 46.94 64.47

PSO1 21.05 34.21 44.74 53.52 29.41 38.24 32.35 44.74

PSO2 10.81 32.43 56.76 52.11 16.13 16.13 67.74 40.79

16

Videos Courses

Teaching

pedagogical

initiatives

Laboratory

LearningCEER

Guest/ Expert

Lectures

Class Room

Teaching

Industrial

VisitsWorkshops/

Seminars

Field

works/

Internships

Mini/Major

Projects

Activity based Teaching PPTTalk & Chalk Tutorial Teaching

PEDAGOGICAL INITIATIVES IN TEACHING & LEARNING PRACTICES

TEACHING & LEARNING PRACTICES


Question Paper Pattern Bloom’s Taxonomy Rubrics for Evaluation

Process

Rubrics for Laboratory student Projects

Evalu

ati

on

Automation

Adherence to Academic

Calendar

Instructional Methods

and Pedagogical

Initiatives

Mentoring and Assisting

Slow Learners

Encouraging Advanced

LearnersStudent Feedback RubricsT

LP

Yes

Course Coordinator

prepares the

question paper

Question paper is submitted to

Department Examination

Committee for review

Question Paper finalized

After

review

No

QUALITY OF QUESTION PAPERS & ASSIGNMENTS

Process for ensuring the quality of

Continuous Internal Evaluation

Process for ensuring the quality of

Semester End Examination

External experts for setting

question paper are

recommended by

Controller of

Examination/HOD

Question paper is prepared by

considering Blooms Taxonomy

Level (BTL) and COs

Module coordinator moderates

the Semester End Examination

question papers

Process for ensuring the quality

of Assignments

Sets of five questions given to

the students based on various

Blooms Taxonomy Levels and

COs

Students submit the assignments -

physically/ Google forms/Google

classes/Codenow

Assessment is carried out for

critical thinking, creativeness

in writing the assignments


ALLOCATION, RUBRICS & EVALUATION PROCESS OF PROJECTS

Department of CSE, CMRCET 19

HoD will appoint the Project

coordinator

Project coordinator will collect the topics

from the faculty

The list will be shared to the students

Formation of batches

Students' interests/selection of topics

submitted to the coordinator

Allocation of the batches to the faculty

based on the domain

Project commencement

20

Rubrics to conduct Abstract Review

➢ Abstract

➢ Problem Statement

➢ Literature Survey

➢ Project planning

➢ Question and Answer

Quality of Student Projects

Rubrics to ensure measurement of individual and team Performance:

Rubrics to conduct Review-1 & 2

➢ Architecture/ System Design

➢ Implementation (50% or 75%)

➢ Methodology

➢ Contribution of the Candidate

➢ Suggesting to publication

➢ Presentation skills

➢ Question and Answer

Rubrics to conduct Final Review

➢ Overall architecture/System Design

➢ Final Implementation

➢ Methodology

➢ Verification of Results

➢ Verification of publications/conferences

➢ Presentation skills and Question & Answer

Internships


Name of the Company 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21Accelq - 4 -ACTYV - 2 -Agilitix 1 - -Amazon - - 3Aptroid 1 - -Aviso 1 - -Being Zero Pvt Lltd - - 2Colruyt 3 - -Comake IT 3 7 1Duta S/w India Pvt. Ltd. 1 - -Epam - - 2GGK Tech 1 2 -Host Analytics 5 2 -IBI 1 5 2Informatica - 1 4Invesco 4 - -Kantar 1 - -KEKA Technovert - 1 -Kony Labs 3 4 -MAQ 2 2 9Mentor Graphics Pvt Ltd - - 9

Name of the Company 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21MTX - 1 -NCR - 1 -NetCracker Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd - - 10OC-Tanner - 1 -Open Text 10 6 6OYO 2 - -Pruple Talk - - 4Radatory Technologies - - 1Sedin Technologies 5 - -Sterling - 5 -Synchrony Finance 1 - 1Techigai - - 2Tecnics - - 1Tek Systems 1 1 2Travel Tripper 3 - -Value Labs 2 1 -Virtusa - - 9Watchguard technologies - - 1Yupp Tv - - 1Zenoti 1 - -

Total 53 48 68

CRITERION - 3

COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES


PSO1: Problem Solving Skills: Ability to apply mathematicalconcepts, algorithm design techniques and suitable Data structuresto solve practical problems using different problem-solvingstrategies.

PSO2: Professional Skills: Ability to design computing solutions forproblems in interdisciplinary areas.

23

List of PSOs

24

Process for Articulation of CO - PO

Department Advisory

Committee

25

CO# Statements

C211.1 Describe Database system architecture, Data models and list the applications of Database SystemsC211.2 Write Queries in Database languages to create, manipulate data in the Database systemsC211.3 Explain the schema refinement techniques to organize the data in the databaseC211.4 apply and relate the concept of transaction, concurrency control and recovery in database.C211.5 Explain and apply storage and indexing techniques of data on external storage media

Course name: Data Base Management Systems, R15 Regulation

CO# PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

C211.1 1 2 2 1 - - - - - 1 - 1 1 1

C211.2 2 2 3 2 3 - - - 1 - - 2 3 2

C211.3 3 2 2 2 - - - - 1 1 - 1 2 1

C211.4 2 2 1 2 - - - - - - - 1 1 1

C211.5 2 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 1

CO-PO Articulation: Sample

PROCESS FOR CO ATTAINMENT


Assessment Tools

Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE)

➢ Theory Courses

➢ Lab Course Internal

➢ Lab Course External

➢ Evaluation of Project work

➢ Evaluation of Technical Seminar

PO ATTAINMENT- DIRECT AND INDIRECT


PO

Attainment

Direct

AssessmentCO attainment of Courses 80%

Indirect

AssessmentExit Students Survey 10%

Employer Survey 10%

Total Attainment =

Direct Attainment * 0.8 + Indirect Attainment * 0.2

PO Attainment Indirect

(2016-20)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12Exit Survey 2.84 2.78 2.79 2.73 2.69 2.74 2.83 2.71 2.7 2.74 2.71 2.69

Employer Survey 2.88 2.76 2.88 2.76 2.88 2.88 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.88 2.76

PO

Att

ain

me

nt

28

29

PO Attainment Direct Method: Sample

PO Attainment = 𝑖=1

5𝐶𝑂𝑖𝑃𝑂1𝑖

𝑃𝑂𝑖

PO Indirect Method : Samples

30

Employer Survey Exit Survey

PO Attainment (2016-20)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12Indirect Attainment 2.86 2.77 2.84 2.74 2.78 2.81 2.8 2.74 2.73 2.75 2.8 2.72

Direct Attainment 2.88 2.86 2.84 2.89 2.85 2.78 2.97 2.9 2.95 2.93 2.9 2.87

PO

Att

ain

me

nt

31

PSO Attainment

(2016-20)

0

1

2

3

PSO1 PSO2Employer Survey 2.88 2.76

Exit Survey 2.7 2.86

PS

O A

tta

inm

en

t

32

0

1

2

3

PSO1 PSO2Direct Attainment 2.86 2.79

Indirect Attainment 2.9 2.74

PS

O A

tta

inm

en

t

CRITERION - 4

STUDENTS' PERFORMANCE


Student Profile & Successful graduates without backlogs

34

2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18

Intake 240 240 240 240

Admitted 240 240 240 240

Lateral Entry 0 24 24 20

Separate Division students

3 2 1 1

% of Admissions 100 100 100 100

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2016-20 2015-19 2014-18Graduated 179 151 138

Total No of students 265 251 244

Nu

mb

er

of

Stu

de

nts

Successful Graduated Students (in stipulated time)

0

100

200

300

2016-20

2015-19

2014-18

Graduated 201 222 204

Total No of students 265 251 244

Nu

mb

er

of

Stu

de

nts

35

Academic Year Mean CGPA

number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination

Academic Performance =

Average API

CAYm2 (2018-19) 8.07 248/260 7.67

CAYm3 (2017-18) 7.86 248/259 7.52CAYm4 (2016-17)

LYG7.74 246/260 7.32

Academic Performance of II Year

Placement Index

2016-17 2015-16 2014-15

Finaly Year Students 242 236 221

Placed&HigherStudies 188 196 176

Placements 168 151 141

Higher Education 20 45 35

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Nu

mb

er

of

Stu

de

nts

36

Student Magazine

37Sample Student Magazine

Student Co-Curricular & Extra Curricular Activities

CertificationsTechnical

EventsWithinState

TechnicalEvents Other

StatesWorkshops

2020-21 68 28 21 15

2019-20 294 190 101 33

2018-19 1 25 61 95

2017-18 12 13 0 18

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350N

um

be

r o

f P

art

icip

ati

on

s

2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18

38

SN# Academic Year

Professional Society Events

1 2020-21 2

2 2019-20 6

3 2018-19 2

4 2017-18 1

SN# Academic Year

No. of Guest Lectures Conducted

1 2020-21 10

2 2019-20 15

3 2018-19 25

4 2017-18 8

CRITERION - 5

FACULTY INFORMATION AND

CONTRIBUTION


STUDENT FACULTY RATIO

STUDENT FACULTY RATIO IS MAINTAINED

FACULTY CADRE PROPORTION


Description CAY(2020-21) CAYm1 (2019-20) CAYm2 (2018-19)

Total No. of Students in the Department(S)

824 837 836

No. of Faculty in the Department(F)

45 45 46

Student Faculty Ratio(SFR)

18.31 18.17 18.60

Average SFR 18.36

Year Professors Associate Professors Assistant ProfessorsRequired Available Required Available Required Available

CAY(2020-21) 4.00 5.00 9.00 7.00 27.00 33.00

CAYm1(2019-20) 4.00 5.00 9.00 6.00 27.00 34.00

CAYm2(2018-19) 4.00 5.00 9.00 4.00 27.00 37.00

Average Numbers 4.00 5.00 9.00 5.67 27.00 34.67

FACULTY QUALIFICATION

FACULTY RETENTION


SN# Designation 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19

With PhD.

Without PhD.

With PhD.

Without PhD.

With PhD.

Without PhD.

With PhD.

Without PhD.

1 Professors 4 - 5 1 5 1 5 1

2 Associate Professors 8 5 7 6 5 7 5 9

3 Assistant Professors 4 25 3 22 4 24 3 26

4 Total number of Faculty (UG+PG)

46 45 45 46

Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22

No of Faculty

Retained43 43 37

Total No of

Faculty 45 45 46

Avg % of Faculty

Retained90.51

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18Total 241 262 169 115

FDPs 126 162 120 90

Workshops 94 67 13 25

Certification 21 33 30 0

No

of

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

ns

Faculty Professional Activities

42

0

2

4

6

8

10

2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18FDP/Workshops 10 8 8 8

Nu

mb

er

of

Org

an

ize

d

Attended

Organized

Patents

Sn Name Of The Faculty Product Development

1 Dr. K Vijaya KumarSystem For Voice Induced Home Modulation

2 Advanced Safety System For Automobiles And Methods Employed Thereof

3 Smart Pen drive

4

Major Dr. V. A. Narayana

Dynamic Analysis Of Earthquake Resistant Structures

5 System And Method For Complex Material Decomposition

6A Novel Method And System For Detecting Near Duplicators For

Both Web Documents And Normal Documents

7 Advanced Safety System For Automobiles And Methods Employed Thereof

8 Method Of Edge Preservation In Images

9 A Motorized Wheel Chair For The Differently Abled

10 Siva Skandha S System For Voice Induced Home Modulation

11 Mr. K. Venkateswara Rao Modular Security Camera System

12 Dr. K. Rama Krishna System For Assistive Aid In Paralysis Treatment

13

Dr Murali

covid-19 relevant problem using machine learning algorithm

14 IPVM-System Intelligent parking vacancy management and control system

15 Dr.K.LoheswaranSleep Apnea Detection Method For In Bed Patients From Spo2

Signal Using Machine Learning

16 Dr P Chandrasekhar

Reddy

“Feed forward neural networks combined with extreme learning machine approach for large weather

data”.

17 “Dynamic Device Management frame work for smart industries using OMA-DM IOT Protocol” 43

Faculty Publications

2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18

Journals 42 30 51 46

Conferences 41 50 48 7

Book Chapter 31 46 21 11

Scopus 46 36 43 32

SCI 13 4 5 0

Google Scholar/WoS 73 47 51 57

01020304050607080

Nu

mb

er

of

Pu

bli

cati

on

s

44

SN Name of the Faculty Citations H-Index

1 Dr. Mohd. Dilshad

Ansari

601 12

2 Dr. Sarat Chandra

Nayak

539 12

3 Dr V A Narayana 64 4

4 Dr. K Vijaya Kumar 128 7

5 Dr P Chandra Sekhar

Reddy

61 4

6 S Siva Skandha 40 4

TOP-5 H-Index

SN# Name of the Faculty University

1 Dr K Vijaya Kumar JNTUHBennett University

2 Dr V A Narayana JNTUH

3 Dr V Ramaraju JNTUH, JJTU

4 Dr D Murali JJTU

5 Dr Sarath Chandra Nayak KIIT

Research Guide RecognitionsPhD Awarded

SN# Name of the Faculty Year

1 Dr A Poongodai 2019

2 Dr P Anjusha 2019

3 Dr P Chandrasekhar Reddy 2021

4 Dr L Chandrasekhar Reddy 2021

5 Dr R Venkateswara Reddy 2021

Research Grants - Government


S.No. Title of the R&D Project or Research Grant Sanctioning Agency, and Date of Sanction

Names of the Principal and Co Investigators

Sanctioned AmountRs. In lakhs

Status of the Project (completed/ on-going)

1

Study of Neuro Medical Diagnostics of cognitive impairment in case of Parkinson disease using real time multi-channel micro electrode neural recording systems

DST-CSRIFile No: SR/CSRI/201/2016

Dr Venkateswarla Rama Raju & Dr V A Narayana

35.236 Lakhs Completed

2Localization and Mapping Portable Assistive System for Visually Impaired

SEED-DST:File No: SEED/TIDE/2018/55Date: 15th February, 2019

Dr. Merugu Suresh & Dr. K. Vijaya Kumar

53.83 Lakhs Ongoing

3Science Technology and Innovation Hub for Development of Scheduled Tribe in Medchal-Malkajgiri District of Telangana State

DST/SEED/TSP/STI/2019/94 Dated: 08th Nov 2019

Dr. Suresh Merugu , & Dr K Vijaya Kumar

289 Lakhs Ongoing

4GOC-Grant for Organizing ConferenceDepartment of CSE

AICTE AQIS: F. No. 67-69/RIFD/GOC/Policy-1/2017-18 Dated-22-04-2019

Dr. K. Vijaya Kumar/ G Ramakrishna05.00Lakhs Completed

5Faculty Development Programme

AICTE AQIS: F. No. 67-69/RIFD/FDP/Policy-1/2017-18 Dated-22-05-2019

Dr. KLS Sowjanya04.15Lakhs Completed

6

Training programmes: In-house Short term training/FDP Programmes for Faculty/UG/PG/Doctoral Students of two weeks duration

File No. DST/ICPS/ Training/ST/2019- Sensor Network (TPN No. 26662/PIFile. No.DST/ICPS/SCST/2019/121)Dated: 30/03/2019

Mr. Venkateshwarlu Naik 09.00 LakhsCompleted

7Travel Grant for attending “20th International Congress of Parkingsons’s Disease and Movement Disorders”

Dr Venkateshwarla Rama RajuSERB/F/411/2017-18 dated 05/05/2017

64,384/-Completed

8International Travel Grant to attend IEEE Intelligent System 2017 held in England

Dr Venkateshwarla Rama RajuAcademic University Grants Commission (UGC) F.No 6-56/2018

1,75,129/-Completed

Consultancy Grants


Sl No Year Project Title Funding AgencyProject Value

Principal Investigator Associate Investigators Duration

1 2017-18Digital Learning Platform Hebeon Training & Consulting

Hebeon Technologies 1 Lakh Dr K Vijaya Kumar Mr.S Gnanender Reddy 1 year

2 2017-18 Academic Management Systems PDQ Softech 3 lakh

Dr K Vijaya Kumar Mr S Siva Skandha

4 monthsDr V A Narayana Mr B Tulasi DasDr K L S Soujanya Mr R Venkata Rathnam

Mr B Sivaiaha Mr R Venkateswara Reddy

3 2017-18Information Security Management System in Line with ISO 27001:2013 Consulting and Certification

FUSION Technologies 8 lakh

Dr. K Vijaya Kumar Dr V A Narayana

Dr K RamakrishnaMr A Pavan Kumar

Mr Ch Raja Kishore BabuMr L Chandrasekhar ReddyMr P Chandrasekhar ReddyMs R SuhasiniMr R Venkata RathnamMr R Venkata Reddy

9 months

4 2017-18 Consultant Trainners at Coign TechnologyCoign Consultants Pvt.

Ltd.1 lakh

S Gnanendra Reddy S Gnanendra Reddy10 months

Dr V A Narayana S Siva Skandha

5 2018-19 Consultant Trainners at Coign TechnologyCoign Consultants Pvt.

Ltd.4 Lakh Dr K Vijaya Kumar

Dr. V A Narayana1 year 2 months

Mr.S Gnanender ReddyMr S Siva Skandha

6 2018-19 Academic Management Systems PDQ Softech 2.73 LakhDr V A Narayana Mr K Venkateswara Rao

1 yearDr K Vijaya Kumar Mr S.Siva SkandhaDr K L S Soujanay Mr V Venkataiah

7 2018-19Information Security Management System in Line with ISO 27001:2013 Consulting and Certification

FUSION Technologies 6.87 lakh

Dr V A Narayana Mr L Chandrasekhar Reddy

9 months

Dr K Vijaya Kumar Mr S Siva SkandhaDr V Ramesh Ms B Anuradha

Mr K Venkateswara RaoMs P SruthiMs R SuhasiniMr V Venkataiah

8 2018-19 CodeNow-Digital Learning Platform (DLP)KODNAV Software

Solutions1 Lakh Mr.S Gnanender Reddy

Dr. K. Vijaya Kumar1 year

Dr. V A Narayana

Visiting Faculty


SN A.Y Course Name YearHours Per Sem

Resource Person

1 2018-19 Data science & Big Data Analytics III 60 Dr Shanmugam Vel, ICT

2

2019-20

ServiceNow III 60 Mr. Sanuj, ServiceNow

3 Lean stack Development II 60 Mr. Rama Shankar, Pyramid

4 Mean Stack Development III 60 Mr. Ramesh Reddy, Coign

5 Full Stack Development IV 60 Mr. Satya, CodeNow

6

2020-21

Lean stack Development II 60 Mr. Rama Shankar, Pyramid

7 Mean Stack Development III 60 Mr. Ramesh Reddy, Coign

8 Full Stack Development IV 60 Mr. Satya, CodeNow

CRITERION - 6

FACILITIES AND TECHNICALSUPPORT


✓ Complaint Register is maintained at server room for computer & peripherals

related issues

✓ Specific Safety Rules like Do’s and Don’ts are displayed and instructed for

all students.

✓ First aid box is maintained.

✓ Fire extinguishers are kept outside the laboratories.

✓ CCTV installed. Systems are installed with Antivirus software.

✓ Log register is maintained in the labs.

✓ SOPHOS Firewall

Safety measures in laboratories

Department Library

No of Textbooks: 316

No of Classrooms & Labs

No of Classrooms : 11

No of Physical Labs : 13

No of Server Rooms : 01

Center of Excellences : 02

No of Project Labs : 01

Computing Facilities

No of Computers : 605

No of Servers : 04

CLASSROOMS, LABS, COMPUTING FACILITIES, DEPARTMENT LIBRARY,

OVER ALL AMBIENCE & SAFETY MEASURES

49

Laboratories


• C Programming Lab• Data Structures & Algorithms Lab• Object Oriented Programming through JAVA Lab• Database Management Systems Lab• Algorithms Lab• Computer Networks Lab• Operating Systems Lab• Mobile App Development Lab• Compiler Design Lab• Web Technologies Lab• scripting languages lab• Machine Learning /Data Mining Lab• Project Lab

• Center of Excellence in AI & DL in association with leadingindia.ai

• Center of Academic Excellence in Data science and Bigdata Analytics in association with ICT and DellEMC

• Center of Excellence in National Cyber Defence Resource Center

• Center of Excellence in Full Stack in association with Virtusa

• Research Center recognized by JNTUH

CRITERION - 7

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT



• Action will be taken for the shortfalls in POs and PSOs attainment

• Action may involve providing assignments to the students, guest lectures, value added courses, ICT based learning etc.,

• If the attainment is reached, then the target will be revised in the next academic year

ACTIONS TAKEN BASED ON THE RESULTS OF EVALUATION OF EACH OF THE PO

POs Target Level Attainment Level Observations

PO 1 : Engineering Knowledge

PO1 2.25 2.5 Target Level Attained

Observation

Courses with CO not attained: (C113) Switching Theory and Logic Design,(C209) Java Programming Action Taken Although

the overall PO target was achieved, few courses like Java Programming, Switching Theory and Logic Design achieved a CO-

target of below 70%. Discussions with students in class Review meetings with HOD reveals that

Action -1

In switching theory and logic design students had a difficulty in understanding concepts such as Flip-Flops, Registers, Counters.

Faculty were asked to conduct classes and also asked the faculty to provide students extra study material and online recourses.

Action-2

In Java Programming students had a difficulty in understanding the principles of Java programming. Faculty were asked to

give more real-world examples to make students feel comfortable in Java Programming.


• Action will be taken for the shortfalls in POs and PSOs attainment

• Action may involve providing assignments to the students, guest lectures, value added courses, ICT based learning etc.,

• If the attainment is reached, then the target will be revised in the next academic year

ACTIONS TAKEN BASED ON THE RESULTS OF EVALUATION OF EACH OF THE PSO

POs Target Level Attainment Level ObservationsPSO 2: Professional Skills: Ability to design computing solutions for problems in interdisciplinary areas.

PSO2 2.1 2.50 Target Level AttainedObservationObservation All Courses mapped have attained their set target. However, the attainment of web technologies course is not so strong.

Action -1Faculty were advised to conduct extra lab sessions and strengthen teaching-learning methods

Action-2Faculty were asked to give students extra study material, online recourses ,self-learning materials and eBooks .Faculty were asked to motivate students to take up real-time case studies and implement them using HTML andJavaScripting languages

Academic audit committee will be appointed by the Principal for every audit.❑ Assessment Criteria:

▪ Curricular Aspect▪ Teaching and Learning▪ Evaluation and Results▪ Learning Resources

❑ Frequency of Audit:• Periodical academic audits are conducted for the Teaching

Learning Process and other departmental activities by thedepartment audit committee once in a semester.

• Audit is seen as the process to improve the quality and not asmechanism for finding faults.

• The academic audit is a twofold system comprising of Internal andExternal Audits. The external academic audit will be conductedby the affiliating University, JNTU Hyderabad once in a year.

❑ Action Plan:alsoNon-compliance reports are given for the deviations which

contains suitable suggestions given by the audit members.❑ Implementation & Effectiveness:The suggestions given by the audit members will be accepted and implemented in the department to make the audit process effective.

ACADEMIC AUDIT

Academic

Audit

Committee

Formation

Schedule

for Audit

Audit

Report and

Submissio

n to

Principal &

IQAC Dean

Suggestion

for

improveme

nt by IQAC

& Principal

Action

Taken By

HOD at

department

Level

Action

taken

report from

HOD

54

Continuous Improvement in Placements

55

Batch Before NBA After NBA

2011-15 2012-16 2013-17 2014-18 2015-19 2016-20

No of Placements 119 174 136 141 151 168

No of Companies 27 27 27 41 53 45

Avg Package (LPA) 3.3 2.8 3.3 3.43 3.92 4.45

Min Package (LPA) 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.68 1.20 1.40

Highest Package (LPA) 14 3.5 14 10.12 10 15.75

Top MNCs Visited 6 5 8 12 20 16

Continuous Improvement in the Admission

Department of CSE, CMRCET3-Dec-21 56

S.NO Program Year Intake Admitted Total Number

of Students

TS Eamcet/ TS Ecet

Open Close

1 B.Tech 2020-21 240 240 243 3663 8692

Later entry 24 24 193 193

2 B.Tech 2019-20 240 240 266 6048 11218


3 B.Tech 2018-19 240 240 265 6017 11395

Later entry 24 24 389 4840

4 B.Tech 2017-18 240 241 261 5258 98668

Later entry 24 24 530 4375

5 B.Tech 2016-17 240 240 265 5125 108714


6 B.Tech 2015-16 240 240 251 5951 78091


7 B.Tech 2014-15 240 238 244 16241 190815


Budget

Budgeted

Actual Expenses

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 2017-18

Budgeted 95 37.4 113 65

Actual Expenses 94.3 35.62 109.11 63.32

Bu

dget

(in

Lak

hs)

57

BEST PRACTICES

➢ Periodical Revision of Curriculum.

➢ Implementation of Innovative Teaching Methodologies.

➢ Remedial Classes for Slow Learners and Backlog Students.

➢ Encouraging B.Tech Final Year Students to Publish their Project Works.

➢ Value Added Programs are offered for students

➢ Continuous Mentoring for Students Competitions.

➢ Encouraging Facultyto attended FDPs and MOOCs courses.

➢ Quality publications by Faculty

➢ Center of Excellences



OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION : PHILOSOPHY


OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION : COMPONENTS OF CURRICULUM

Total 194 Credits

• R15 CBCS

Total 160 Credits

• R18 CBCS

R15 – Regulation R18 – Regulation AICTE

S. NO Course Work – Subject Area Credits- in % Credits- TotalCredits- in

%Credits-

TotalCredits- in

%Credits-

Total

1 Basic Sciences 12.89 12.89 14.69 28 7.5 12

2 Engineering Sciences 13.40 13.40 14.38 33 15.62 25

3 Humanities and Social Sciences 9.79 9.79 6.88 16 15 24

4 Program Core 40.72 40.72 36.56 72 30 48

5 Program Electives 10.31 10.31 11.25 18 11.25 18

6 Open Electives 4.64 4.64 7.50 12 11.25 18

7 Project(s) 6.19 6.19 6.25 20 9.38 15

8 Internships/Seminars 1.03 1.03 2.50 4 - -

9 Comprehensive Viva 1.03 1.03 0 0 - -

10 Mandatory Courses 0 0 0 12 - -

Total number of Credits 100 % 194 100 % 160 100 % 160

Introduction of the Choice Based Credit System (CBCS).

Ma

jor

imp

rove

me

nts

inR

18

Cu

rric

ulu

mfr

om

R

15

Cu

rric

ulu

m:

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION : IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CURRICULUM

Mini projects I & II have been introduced in the III Year I & II

Semesters respectively to ensure the exposure of applications to core courses

Increased number of professional electives from 5 to 6.

Offered wide range of open

electives

Identified the domain basedcourses and also mandatory courses are included in the

curriculum.

Facilitates students to take open electives in advance from II Year

onwards.


Due weightage is given for all the curriculum components: Basic Sciences,

Engineering

Sciences, Humanities, Program Core,Program Electives & Open Electives.

To fulfill the requirements of the Industry, introduced new courses such as Cloud

Computing, Design Analysis And Algorithms, DSP& Architectures, RTOS etc.

Ma

jor

imp

rove

me

nts

inR

15

Cu

rric

ulu

m:



Due weightage is given for all the curriculum components: Basic Sciences,

Engineering

Sciences, Humanities, Program Core,Program Electives & Open Electives.

To fulfill the requirements of the Industry, introduced new courses such Machine

Learning, Deep Learning, Ethical Hacking etc.,

Ma

jor

imp

rove

me

nts

inR

15

Cu

rric

ulu

mfr

om

R1

4 c

urr

icu

lum




OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION: ACTIVITY BASED LEARNING

FLIPPED LEARNING FLIPPED LEARNING STUDENT SEMINAR

JUST A MINUTE ACTIVITY

PROCESS FOR CO ATTAINMENT


Assessment Tools

Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE)

➢ Theory Courses

➢ Lab Course Internal

➢ Lab Course External

➢ Evaluation of Project work

➢ Evaluation of Technical Seminar

DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF COURSES AND BENCHMARK LEVELS

Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) Semester End Examination (SEE)

% of studentsBenchmark

Attainment Level% of students ≥

BenchmarkAttainment

Level

> =60 3 > =60 3

>=50 <60 2 >=50 <60 2

< 50 1 < 50 1

• Direct Attainment (DA): [ (0.3 * CIE) + (0.7 * SEE) ]

Semester End Examination (SEE) – 70 Marks

Benchmark = 50% of Max Marks

Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) – 30 Marks

Benchmark = 60% of Max Marks

Total Course Attainment (CA): Direct Attainment (DA)


65

CO# Statements

1 Write basic java programs2 Demonstrate various OOPs concepts3 Compare and contrast Multi threading with Multi tasking , discuss Exception Handling4 Explain Java frameworks and Develop JDBC based applications5 Design GUI programming.

Course name: Java Programming, R15 Regulation

CO# PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

1 2 1 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -

2 2 1 1 - 1 - - - - - - 1 1

3 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2

4 2 1 1 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2

5 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2

CO-PO Articulation: Sample

Not attained Example

66

CO Attainment (Internal Exam)

CO attainment example for Internal Test

67

CO Attainment (External Exam)

CO attainment example for External Test

CO Attainment Level Example

68

CO Attainment (Overall)

FINAL ATTAINMENT (70% of External marks + 30% of Internal marks)

Description CO1 C02 C03 CO4 CO5

External Examinations Attainment 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00

Internal Examinations Attainment 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

70% of External Examinations Attainment 0.70 1.40 2.10 0.70 0.70

30% of Internal Examinations 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60

Final Attainment (70% of Ext + 30% of Int) 1.30 2.00 2.70 1.30 1.30

COs Attainment PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 P07 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

CO1 1.30 2 1 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -

CO2 2.00 2 1 1 - 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -

CO3 2.70 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2 -

CO4 1.30 2 1 1 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2 -

CO5 1.30 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 1 2 -

Attainment 1.77 1.80 1.74 - 1.72 - - - - - - 1.72 1.74 -

CO1, CO4, and CO5 are not attained

(UGC Autonomous) Accredited by NAAC with “A+” Grade ...

Documents

Transcript of (UGC Autonomous) Accredited by NAAC with “A+” Grade ...