U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

download U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

of 23

Transcript of U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    1/23

    Sixth Annual Conference on

    Carbon Capture & Sequestration

    Capture Advanced Concepts

    CO2 CAPTURE IN IGCC PLANTS

    VIA CRYOGENIC SEPARATION

    May 7-10, 2007

    Sheraton Station Square

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

    S. Consonni, F. Vigano

    -

    Politecnico di Milano(*)

    T. Kreutz

    -

    Princeton University

    L. De Lorenzo

    -

    BP Alternative Energy

    (*) currently visiting the Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    2/23

    Background and Scope

    Technologies of choice for the removal of CO2 from shifted

    syngas in IGCCs are chemical and physical absorption

    With high-pressure gasification, Selexol physical absorption is

    apparently preferable

    Selexol system is expensive (large absorber vessel, large solvent

    flow rates, recycle compressor, refrigeration system, etc.) and

    makes CO2 available at low pressure large power requirements

    An alternative technology could be cryogenic separation

    This presentation discusses thermodynamic issues and plant

    configurations

    Preliminary performance estimates are presented for a system

    applicable to the IGCC planned by BP at Carson (California)

    Work is underway to verify simulation results and estimate costs

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    3/23

    CO2 removal by Selexol

    togas turbine

    from H2Sremoval

    CO2 leansolvent

    Solvent pump

    H2O

    Solvent

    Dehydrator

    ~

    ~~

    ~

    ~

    Flash drums

    CO2Absorber

    Hydraulicturbine

    Recyclecompressor

    Main CO2 compressor

    CO2 to

    storage

    Refrigeration

    CO2 pump

    Refrigeration

    Intercooling

    Aftercooling

    After-cooling

    Aftercooling

    Intercooling

    ~

    Saturator

    Syngasexpander

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    4/23

    Basic assumptions

    Refer to conditions expected for BP DF-2: IGCC with CO2 capturefed with pet-coke, to be built in the Carson refinery (California)

    Entrained-flow, oxygen-blown GE quench gasifier followed by

    two shifts and cooling to nearly ambient temperature

    Mole flow Mol fract Mass flow Mass fract

    kmol/hr % kg/s %

    H2O 40.1 0.139 0.201 0.121CO 343.9 1.193 2.676 1.612

    H2 15,719.5 54.530 8.802 5.304

    CO2 12,315.5 42.722 150.556 90.724

    CH4 5.9 0.020 0.026 0.016Ar 29.8 0.103 0.331 0.199

    N2 100.2 0.348 0.780 0.470

    H2S 271.9 0.943 2.574 1.551

    COS 0.2 0.001 0.003 0.002Total 28,827.0 100.000 165.949 100.000

    Temperature, C 40.0

    Pressure, bar 60.0

    Density, kg/m

    3

    48.17LHV, MJ/kg 6.77

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    5/23

    Basic thermodynamics of cryogenic separation

    25 bar40C

    Condensation temperaturedecreases as a consequence

    of lower CO2 partialpressure in the gas phase

    First liquidforms atabout -10C

    When temperature and pressurereach triple point conditions,a solid phase appears

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    6/23

    Gas/liquid mixtures

    For mixtures with other species in addition to CO2,

    thermodynamic properties are estimated by Redlich-

    Kwong-Soave (RKS) equation of state.

    Very similar results would be obtained with the Peng-

    Robinson equation of state.

    To be conservative, weve neglected the depression of

    the freezing point temperature due to the presence of

    species other than CO2

    Further work is needed to clarify the behaviour of CO2-

    based mixtures at low temperature, particularly the

    freezing point.

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    7/23

    Basic process: cool syngas to the lowest temperature

    that still prevents freezing

    At 60 bar:

    Removal of H2S is nearly 85%

    Removal of CO2 is about 80%

    T = - 53C

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    8/23

    Two-stage scheme

    58 bar25C159.36 kg/s

    31 bar

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    9/23

    Two-stage scheme: CO2 and H2S capture

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    10/23

    Scheme considered in this work

    60 bar40C165.95 kg/s

    30 bar

    31 bar

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    11/23

    Assumptions

    Polytropic efficiency of compressors 0.82

    Polytropic efficiency of syngas expander 0.85

    Hydraulic efficiency of CO2 pump 0.75

    Mechanical - electric efficiency of motor drivers 0.90

    Minimum T of gas/gas exchangers, C 15.00

    Minimum T of liquid/gas exchangers, C 10.00

    Minimum T of CO2 refrigerant/condensing gas exchangers, C 3.00

    Minimum T of ammonia/condensing gas exchangers, C 5.00

    p in main heat exchangers, bar 1.00

    Auxiliary power consumption / heat to environment, % 1.50

    Refrigeration fluid NH3

    T superheating at evaporator exit, C 3.00

    T subcooling at throttle valves inlet, C 5.00

    p in CO2 refrigerant evaporators/condenser/intercooler, bar 0.20T along ammonia evaporator/condenser, C 1.00

    COP of auxiliary chillers (evap. 20C, conden. 35C) 10.20

    Turbomachines

    Heat exchangers

    External refrigeration cycle and auxiliary CO2 chiller

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    12/23

    Internal refrigeration

    60 bar40C

    165.95 kg/s

    30 bar112C 31 bar10C

    24.03 kg/s

    135.4 kg/s

    -53C-53C

    135.4 kg/s

    100C135.4 kg/s

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    13/23

    60 bar40C

    165.95 kg/s

    30 bar112C 31 bar10C

    24.03 kg/s

    -53C-53C

    135.4 kg/s

    100C135.4 kg/s

    150 bar25C

    135.4 kg/s

    -33C

    -56C

    +3.8C

    Internal refrigeration

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    14/23

    60 bar40C

    165.95 kg/s

    30 bar112C 31 bar10C

    24.03 kg/s

    -53C-53C

    135.4 kg/s

    100C135.4 kg/s

    150 bar25C

    135.4 kg/s

    -33C

    -56C

    +3.8C

    Internal refrigeration

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    15/23

    E t l f i ti

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    16/23

    60 bar40C

    165.95 kg/s

    30 bar112C

    31 bar10C

    23.13 kg/s

    136.1 kg/s

    -55C-55C

    41.38 kg/s

    100C23.13 kg/s

    -45.6C

    -60.0C

    External refrigeration

    E t l f i ti

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    17/23

    60 bar40C

    165.95 kg/s

    30 bar112C

    31 bar10C

    23.13 kg/s

    136.1 kg/s

    -55C-55C

    41.38 kg/s

    100C23.13 kg/s

    -45.6C

    -60.0C

    External refrigeration

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    18/23

    Preliminary design of syngas turbo-compressor

    EXPANDER:axial, 6 stagesshaft power 23 MW

    COMPRESSOR:centrifugal, 5 stagesshaft power 28 MW

    1st stage:external diameter 0.25 mblade height at impellerdischarge 0.016 m

    5th stage:

    external diameter 0.22 mblade height at impellerdischarge 0.01 m

    6st stage:external diameter 0.24 mblade height 0.025 m

    1st

    stage:external diameter 0.19 mblade height 0.01 m

    single shaft

    33,000 rpm

    electric motor

    5.5 MWel

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    19/23

    Internal vs

    external

    refrigeration:

    mass balances

    internal ref. external ref.

    Minimum T of gas being treated C -53.00 -55.00

    Maximum P of gas being treated bar 300.00 300.00

    kg/s 24.03 23.13

    LHV, MJ/kg 44.25 45.78

    bar 30.00 30.00

    C 10.00 10.00

    kg/s 135.35 136.13% mol CO2 97.92 98.01

    % mass CO2 99.71 99.72

    kmol/s 3.07 3.08

    % 91.94 92.48

    kmol/s 3.07 3.09

    % 89.52 90.04

    H2S in ppmvd 19.34 19.34

    H2S out (to gas turbine) ppmvd 1.84 1.73

    COS in ppmvd 4.98 4.98COS out (to gas turbine) ppmvd 0.06 0.06

    MWLHV 13.47 12.94

    % 1.28 1.23

    MWLHV 1.67 1.63

    % 6.18 6.03

    MWLHV 15.45 14.88

    % 1.43 1.38Total LHV lost in flow to storage

    H2 lost in flow to storage

    CO lost in flow to storage

    Cryogenic system

    CO2 captured from syngas

    Carbon captured from syngas

    Syngas to gas turbine

    Flow to carbon storage

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    20/23

    internal ref. external ref.

    kg/s 159.36 159.36MWLHV 1078.52 1078.52

    kg/s 24.03 23.23

    MWLHV 1063.07 1063.64

    kg/s 44.26 41.38

    MWshaft 28.50 27.96

    kg/s 23.90 23.13

    MWshaft -23.39 -23.04

    Syngas turbo-compressor MWel 5.68 5.47

    kg/s 115.11 117.98MWel 1.57 1.38

    kg/s 131.82 13.13

    MWel 7.29 1.82

    kg/s 259.29 40.51

    MWel 18.63 14.26

    kg/s 338.29 49.94

    MWel 15.90 11.24

    CO2 refrigeration after compression MWel 2.25 0.00

    Auxiliaries for cooling water MWel 0.72 1.13MWel 49.80 35.29

    kJel / kg CO2 captured 368.96 259.99Overall power consumption

    Cryogenic system

    Syngas in

    Clean syngas out

    Main syngas compressor

    Syngas expander

    LT refrigeration compressor

    MT refrigeration compressor

    HT refrigeration compressor

    CO2 pump

    Internal vs external refrigeration:energy balance

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    21/23

    Selexol+ CO2 drying

    + CO2 compression

    Selexol for H2S removal+ drying

    + cryogenic with ext.

    refrigeration

    kg/s 165.95 165.95

    LHV, MJ/kg 6.77 6.77kg/s 26.97 27.59

    LHV, MJ/kg 40.07 38.37

    kg/kmol 5.44 5.64

    bar 30.00 30.00

    C 131.30 111.90H2O, % mol 4.89 5.07

    Ar, % mol 0.18 0.15

    CO, % mol 1.96 1.92

    CO2, % mol 4.86 5.38

    H2, % mol 92.38 91.96

    N2, % mol 0.59 0.56

    CH4, ppmv 326.99 294.87

    COS, ppmv n.a. 0.06

    H2S, ppmv n.a. 1.73

    kg/s 140.12 136.13

    % mol CO2 99.97 98.01

    % mass CO2 99.99 99.72

    Syngas to gas turbine

    Flow to carbon storage

    Composition of syngas to gas

    turbine, dry basis

    Syngas in

    Ext. refrigeration vs Selexol: flows and compositions

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    22/23

  • 7/30/2019 U50 - 6th CCS Meeting (5!7!07)

    23/23

    Conclusions

    CO2 cryogenic separation appears a viable alternative toconventional absorption techniques

    Must remove H2S upstream of cryogenic process

    Two-stage schemes can achieve 90% CO2 removal rates

    External ammonia refrigeration cycle appears definitely

    superior to internal refrigeration

    Compared to Selexol, significant reduction of overall power

    consumption

    No new technology, although turbomachinery must be

    specifically designed for cryogenic plant

    Further work needed to increase accuracy of these

    preliminary performance estimates and to assess costs