TWO-COLOR NEUTRON DETECTION FOR ZERO-KNOWLEDGE …aglaser/CP052-Glaser-2015-INMM... ·...
Transcript of TWO-COLOR NEUTRON DETECTION FOR ZERO-KNOWLEDGE …aglaser/CP052-Glaser-2015-INMM... ·...
1 m z
TWO-COLOR NEUTRON DETECTION FOR ZERO-KNOWLEDGE NUCLEAR WARHEAD VERIFICATION
Yan Jie and Alexander Glaser56th INMM Meeting, Indian Wells, California, July 2015
Revision 1
P R E V E N T I N G T H E E X C H A N G E O F S E N S I T I V E I N F O R M AT I O N
Trusted Information Barrier Protocol
Interactive Zero-Knowledge Protocol
Measure sensitive Information Never measure sensitive information
Single-bit observation More complex observation
Hard to authenticate and certify Easier to authenticate and certify
(S. Philippe, B. Barak and A. Glaser, “Designing Protocols for Nuclear Warhead Verification,” this conference)
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
OUR GENERAL APPROACH
3
TEMPLATE-MATCHING (using active neutron interrogation)More difficult to implement than attribute approach, but also more robust against important diversion scenarios
INTERACTIVE ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROTOCOLCan prove that a statement is true without revealing why it is true In contrast to “traditional approaches,” no requirement for trusted information barrier
NON-ELECTRONIC DETECTORSElectronic hardware and sostware used for detectors and, especially, for information barriers are hard to certify and authenticate
Technologies based on “physical” detection may offer important advantages
Generally requires “golden warhead” to generate template (reference signature)
14 MeV Neutron source (Thermo Scientific P 385)
Detector array
Collimator
Collimator slotTest object
“ONE-COLOR” RADIOGRAPHY
(coming up next)
P R O O F T H AT T W O R A D I O G R A P H S A R E I D E N T I C A L
+ =
R A D I O G R A P H I T E M A
C O M P L E M E N T I T E M A F L AT B A C K G R O U N D
+ =
R A D I O G R A P H I T E M B
C O M P L E M E N T I T E M A F L AT B A C K G R O U N D
I T E M B I S E Q U A L T O I T E M A
+ =
R A D I O G R A P H I T E M A
C O M P L E M E N T I T E M A F L AT B A C K G R O U N D
+ =
R A D I O G R A P H I T E M B
C O M P L E M E N T I T E M A R E S I D U A L I M A G E
I T E M B I S N O T E Q U A L T O I T E M A
P R O O F T H AT T W O R A D I O G R A P H S A R E I D E N T I C A L
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
ZERO-KNOWLEDGE VERIFICATION
7
Simulated data from MCNP calculations; neutron detection energies > 10 MeV; N(max) = 5,000 A. Glaser, B. Barak, R. J. Goldston, “A Zero-knowledge Protocol for Nuclear Warhead Verification,” Nature, 510, 26 June 2014, 497–502
Valid item Invalid item
(Tungsten rings replaced by lead rings)
RADIOGRAPHY WITH 14 MeV NEUTRONS
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
FISSION CROSS SECTIONS
8
Pu-239Pu-240U-235
U-238
OF THE MAIN URANIUM AND PLUTONIUM ISOTOPES
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
FISSION CROSS SECTIONS
9
Source: Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF), www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm R. J. Goldston et al., “Zero-knowledge Warhead Verification: System Requirements and Detector Technologies,” 55th INMM Meeting, 2014
Pu-239
Pu-240
U-235
U-238
Pu-239Pu-240U-235
U-238
OF THE MAIN URANIUM AND PLUTONIUM ISOTOPES
Idea: Let’s interrogate with neutrons in the 300-keV range and look for fission neutrons (> 1 MeV)
“TWO-COLOR” NEUTRON SETUP
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTATIONS
11
TEST ITEM
14 MeV SOURCE
Dn > 10 MeV
TRANSMISSION RADIOGRAPH
TEST ITEM
14 MeV SOURCE
Dn > 500 keV D n
> 5
00 k
eV
FISSION SIGNATURE
TEST ITEM
Dn > 500 keV D n
> 5
00 k
eV
300 keV SOURCE
Dn > 500 keV
FISSION SIGNATURE
“ONE-COLOR” AND “TWO-COLOR” SETUPS FOR ACTIVE NEUTRON INTERROGATION
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTATIONS
12
TEST ITEM
14 MeV SOURCE
Dn > 10 MeV
TRANSMISSION RADIOGRAPH
TEST ITEM
14 MeV SOURCE
Dn > 500 keV D n
> 5
00 k
eV
FISSION SIGNATURE
TEST ITEM
Dn > 500 keV
(Dn >150 keV)
300 keV SOURCE
FISSION SIGNATURE (AND TRANSMISSION RADIOGRAPH)
TEST ITEM
Dn > 500 keV D n
> 5
00 k
eVFISSION SIGNATURE
14 MeV SOURCE
Dn > 10 MeV
300 keV SOURCE
Dn > 500 keV
(AND TRANSMISSION RADIOGRAPH)
“ONE-COLOR” AND “TWO-COLOR” SETUPS FOR ACTIVE NEUTRON INTERROGATION
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015 13
D. Chichester
12
Fig. 5 Total neutron yield curves for several reactions. (The DD and DT data for this plot is derived from reference 24 and refers to a fully loaded titanium target with deuterons accelerated into TiD2 for the 2H(d,n)3He reaction and deuterons accelerated into TiT2 for the 3H(d,n)4He. The solid plots refer to 100% atomic beams, except for the 9Be(γ,n)8Be reaction, while the two dashed plots refer to 100% molecular ion beams.)[24,25]
2.1.1 2H + 2H → 3He + n
Using the DD fusion reaction is a straightforward and often used technique for neutron production with particle accelerators. The reaction is exothermic and its cross section yields a useful neutron production rate with accelerating energies of O(100) keV and modest beam currents of O(100) μA. Neutrons from this reaction start at ~2.5 MeV, they are roughly monoenergetic at lower accelerating energies but less so at higher energies, as shown in Fig. 6. The low Q value for the reaction results in a forward-directed anisotropic yield even at low accelerating potentials, with the relative yield from 0° to 90° decreasing by 4× for an accelerating potential 0.5 MeV.[19] The low yield of this reaction compared with the others described here limits its use in many
David L. Chichester, Production and Applications of Neutrons Using Particle Accelerators INL/EXT-09-17312, Idaho National Laboratory, November 2009
A STRONG 300-keV NEUTRON SOURCETOTAL NEUTRON YIELD CURVES FOR SELECTED (THRESHOLD) REACTIONS
OPEN-SOURCE MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS
SimLiT + GEANT 4
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
MODELING APPROACH
15
SimLiT
Dedicated Monte Carlo code to simulate neutrons from 7Li(p,n) reaction
Ability to couple to Geant 4
Open source (designed as a C++ class)
Geant 4
A Monte Carlo simulation toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter; used in many scientific fields
SIMLIT AND GEANT 4
Open source (C++)
(geant4.cern.ch)
(shrek.phys.huji.ac.il/SimLiT)
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
SIMULATED p-Li NEUTRON SOURCE
16
SPECTRUM CAN BE TAILORED BY ADJUSTING THE INCIDENT PROTON ENERGY AND THE THICKNESS OF THE LITHIUM TARGET
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
SIMPLIFIED EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
17
NEUTRON SOURCE, TEST ITEM, AND DETECTOR ARRAY
1 m z
p-Li neutron source
Test item
Neutron detector array (25 x 25)
100 cm 50 cm
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
NOTIONAL TEST ITEMS
18
Based on: Steve Fetter, Valery A. Frolov, Marvin Miller, Robert Mozley, Oleg F. Prilutsky, Stanislav N. Rodionov, Roald Z. Sagdeev “Detecting nuclear warheads,” Science & Global Security, 1 (3–4), 1990, pp. 225–253
Reference item 14.0 cm OD
12 kg of HEU; 93% U-235
Modified isotopics
Modified diameter 15.0 cm OD
(same mass)
Reference item 10.0 cm OD
4 kg of WPu; 93% Pu-239
Modified isotopics
Modified diameter 11.0 cm OD
(same mass)
Fetter et al.’s Uranium Item (12 kg weapon-grade HEU)
Fetter et al.’s Plutonium Item (4 kg weapon-grade Pu)
RESULTS
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
300-keV DRIVEN FISSION SIGNATURES
20
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Valid
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (75% U-235)
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (85% U-235)
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (Same mass, Larger)
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120TemplateValid
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template75% U235
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template85% U235
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template
Same Mass, Larger
Small deviation from Nmax Significant deviation from Nmax (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3 Sigma)
Invalid item (75% U-235)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Valid item (93% U-235)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Invalid item (85% U-235)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
300-keV DRIVEN FISSION SIGNATURES
21
Valid item (93% U-235)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Invalid item (larger diameter)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Valid
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (75% U-235)
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (85% U-235)
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (Same mass, Larger)
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120TemplateValid
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template75% U235
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template85% U235
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template
Same Mass, Larger
Small deviation from Nmax Significant deviation from Nmax (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3 Sigma)
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
“TRANSMISSION RADIOGRAPH”
22
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Valid
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (75% U-235)
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (85% U-235)
Detectors Index0 5 10 15 20 25
Det
ecto
rs In
dex
0
5
10
15
20
25
Invalid (Same mass, Larger)
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120TemplateValid
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template75% U235
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template85% U235
Bubble Counts (with Preload)4400 4600 4800 5000 5200 5400 5600
Det
ecto
rs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Template
Same Mass, Larger
Small deviation from Nmax Significant deviation from Nmax (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3 Sigma)
Valid item (93% U-235)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Invalid item (75% U-235)
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Detector index
Bubble count distribution
Num
ber
of
det
ecto
rsD
etec
tor
index
Invalid item (larger diameter)
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
ASSESSING THE RESULTS
23
USING THE KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV STATISTICAL TEST AS A PASS/FAIL CRITERION
75% U-235 0.872 0
85% U-235 0.986 0
Larger diameter 3.738E–05 0
59% Pu-239 0.822 0
75% Pu-239 0.999 0
Larger diameter 0.112 0
Radiograph Fission signature
Valid item 0.988 0.987
Radiograph Fission signature
Valid item 0.998 0.986
Uranium Item Plutonium Item
As expected, radiography (here: using 300-keV neutrons) is not very sensitive to isotopic changes Fission signature is very clear for uranium and plutonium items
Yan Jie and A. Glaser, INMM, July 2015
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
24
“ONE-COLOR” SETUP
Distinguishing isotopic differences can be more challenging because relevant 14-MeV fission cross sections can be similar for some elements (esp. for Pu-239 vs Pu-240)
“TWO-COLOR” SETUPFission signatures triggered by ~ 300-keV neutrons are extremely sensitive to isotopic differences (and also to differences in geometry)
Needed for experimental demonstration: Intense 2-MeV proton source
Neutron transmission radiography using high-energy (14 MeV) neutrons is effective in detecting geometric and elemental differences
Combine with 14-MeV (and ~150-keV) transmission radiography