Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

17
Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015

Transcript of Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Page 1: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Twinning Training on Student Grading

YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015

Page 2: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Grading based on student centered and transparent assessment of learning

outcomes

([email protected])

presented by Rubina Gasparian email: [email protected]

Page 3: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

The basic assessment types

• Diagnostic assessment: before the learning process: • to recognize, prior to instruction, each student’s strengths, weaknesses, knowledge, and skills;

• Formative assessment: frequent, interactive assessment: • identification of areas for improvement–specific suggestions for improvement;

• Summative assessment: in the end of learning process: • verification of achievement, motivation of individual to maintain or improve performance, certification of performance, grades, promotion

Page 4: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Using learning outcomes for assessment and grading

• The learning outcomes describe the level or nature of studying that the learner is expected to do to pass the course or reach the set level of learning (e.g. Bloom, SOLO)

• Learning outcomes indicate when the learning process is successful (for assessment)

• ”After completing the course, the student should be able to report a scientific research following a structure defined for scientific writing”

• Keep the verbs simple and univocal • If If the werbs and descriptions are obscure or unclear the learners will have difficulties to understand what they are expected to do and the teachers will have difficulties to design a course, to assess, and to give feedback

Page 5: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised by Andersenhttp://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

• Evaluation• Synthesis• Analysis• Application• Comprehension• Knowledge

• Creating• Evaluating• Analyzing• Applying• Understanding• Remembering

Page 6: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.
Page 7: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Egracons Project and Tool

Lifelong Learning project (2012-2015) co-funded by the European commission

GoalTo build up a wide-spread awareness and common understanding of the different grading systems in Europe and to enable an accurate interpretation of grades (or marks) given abroad, leading to a fair and manageable conversion of these grades to a local grade in the home institution.

presented by Anna Karapetyan email: [email protected]

Page 8: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Conversion

Example: Italy (Example of passing grades between 18 and 30 lode)18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 lode

6.9% 1.9% 5.7% 2.3% 6.0% 2.7% 11.3% 8.2% 9.0% 11.8% 12.3% 0.5% 15.7% 5.7%

100 93,1 91,2 85,5 83,2 77,2 74,5 63,2 55 46 34,2 21,9 21,4 5,7

France (Example of passing grades between 10 and 20)

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

34.79% 18.59% 18.45% 12.05% 9.46% 3.65% 2.30% 0.43% 0.22% 0.06% 0%

100 65,21 46,62 28,17 16,12 6,66 3,01 0,71 0,28 0,06 0

*Distribution of the grade within the reference group *Accumulated percentage of students obtaining the grade or lower in red

Page 9: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Necessary Steps

1. Identify the reference group for which the grade distribution will be calculated (normally all students of an ECTS study field per study cycle (e.g. Ba/Ma)

2. Collect all passing grades awarded over a period of (at least) two

academic years for the reference group identified.

3. Calculate the grade distribution in terms of accumulated percentages for the reference group.

4. Compare the percentage table of the other institution’s reference group with your own. The corresponding position of each student within the 2 reference groups is compared. On the basis of this comparison, individual grades can be converted.

Page 10: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Challenges and Good Practices ofGrading Attached to Different Kindof Learning and Teaching Methods

Silja Kostia, Lahti University of Applied SciencesEmail: [email protected]

presented by Mikayel Tovmasyanemail: [email protected]

Page 11: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

The Project in Focus

Electricity and control 15 ECTS credits

Communicating your expertise (4 cr)

Basics of electrical design (3 cr)

Basics of control design (4 cr)

Basics of material and manufacturing technology (4 cr)

Optional Studies and Work placement

Mechanics and automation 15 ECTS credits

Basics of automation design (6 cr)

Basics of mechanical design (6 cr)

Technical drawing (4 cr)

Orientation 15 ECTS creditsFreshmen Studies (3 cr)

Basics of machining and welding (3 cr) Basics of electrical engineering and

electronics (3 cr)Basics of mathematics (3 cr)

Basics of physics 3 (cr)

Project 1 (9 cr)

Automatic Device or System Planning

Constructing

Project work starts at the beginning of Autumn semester (planning) and is finalised at the end of Spring semester (constructing)

Teams of eight students are establised based on the team role theory by Meredith Belbin

Project works are comissioned by companies or by other stakeholders

Other courses in the academic year give competences which support the Project

Page 12: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Grading in project based learning

• Grading is based on three assessment:• 1/ 3 planning ( Is the planning documented properly? Is it possible

to construct the device or the process based on the drawings and descriptions in the doumentation folder?• 1/3 construction ( Does the constructed device or process work as

planned?• 1/3 Self - and peer – assessment.

Page 13: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

What student do?

• Student fills two forms (a webropol survey)• For peer- assessment• Evaluator:• Target of evaluation:• Numerical evaluation:• Written evaluation (from 5 to 10 lines):

• For self – assessment (same requirements as above, but the target is student herself / himself)• All the students keep records of the hours they work, which they then use for

self - assessment

Page 14: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

What student do?

• Numerical assessment was previously from 0 to 5 (0, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 etc.)• Now the assessment is ”grading free” and instead• A student X evaluates the other members of the group by comparing their

contribution as follows• A student Y contributed 20 % more than I did• A student Z contributed 30 % less than I did

• Based on (self) – and peer-assessment students of the group can have different grades

• In practice, peer - assessment reveals ”free riders” but also ”quiet workhorses”. The peer- assessment is both honest and hard when based on working together the whole academic year

Page 15: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Useful Links

• The Egracons Project: www.egracons.eu

• Meredith Belbin’s approach to team roles and how to choose team members based on their roles: www.belbin.com/rte.asp?id=8

• You can find all the training materials here: http://www.brusov.de/TwinningArmenia/

Page 16: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Any Questions?

Page 17: Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.

Thank You