Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

32
Tropical Biases in Next- Generation Climate Models Stefan Tulich 1 and George Kiladis 2 1 CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder CO, USA 2 NOAA ESRL, Boulder CO, USA

description

Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models. Stefan Tulich 1 and George Kiladis 2 1 CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder CO, USA 2 NOAA ESRL, Boulder CO, USA. Coupled climate models are known to suffer from biases. Kim et al. (2008). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Page 1: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Stefan Tulich1 and George Kiladis2

1CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder CO, USA

2NOAA ESRL, Boulder CO, USA

Page 2: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Coupled climate models are known to suffer from biases

Kim et al. (2008)

“High” = 1-2 deg. horizontal grid spacing (5 models)

Page 3: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Coupled climate models are known to suffer from biases

Kim et al. (2008)

“High” = 1-2 deg. horizontal grid spacing (5 models)

Page 4: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Uncoupled models too

12 CMIP3 AGCMs run in AMIP mode

Page 5: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Uncoupled models too

12 AGCMs run in AMIP mode (CMIP3 Archive)

Page 6: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Tropical variability also poorly simulated

Lin et al. (2004)

Page 7: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Focus of this talk

Mean climate and variability of 3 “next-generation” climate models:

1)WRF tropical channel model (36-km, 45S-45N, Kain-Fritsch, AMIP-type run: 2000-2005)

2)GFDL AM2.1 (0.5-deg, global, relaxed AS, SST = climatological ann. cycle, courtesy of G. Lau)

3)SP-CAM (2.5-deg, global, 2D CRM, AMIP-type run, courtesy of M. Khairoutdinov)

Page 8: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 9: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 10: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 11: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 12: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 13: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 14: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Annual Rainfall Bias

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

Page 15: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Basic Question

• How do these mean rainfall biases (e.g., too much rain off the equator/too little rain near the equator) relate to the space-time variability of rainfall?

Page 16: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Symmetric)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 17: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Symmetric)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 18: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Symmetric)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 19: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Symmetric)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 20: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Symmetric)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 21: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Antisym.)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 22: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Rainfall Spectra (Antisym.)

TRMM

WRF AM2.1

SPCAM

Page 23: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Summary thus far:

• Kelvin waves generally too weak or non-existent; n = 0 EIG wave non-existent

• Westward-moving waves better represented, but generally too active, especially in a relative sense:

Westward Power (PW) /Eastward Power (PE)

Page 24: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Ratio of westward- to eastward-moving variance (k =1-25)

SPCAM

WRF

AM2.1

10 5 3.3 2.5

Page 25: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Maps of westward- minus eastward-moving rainfall variance (k=1-25, 2-96 day)

TRMM SPCAM

WRF AM2.1

Page 26: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Maps of westward- minus eastward-moving rainfall variance (k=1-25, 2-96 day)

TRMM SPCAM

WRF AM2.1

Page 27: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Maps of westward- minus eastward-moving rainfall variance (k=1-25, 2-96 day)

TRMM SPCAM

WRF AM2.1

Page 28: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Maps of westward- minus eastward-moving rainfall variance (k=1-25, 2-96 day)

TRMM SPCAM

WRF AM2.1

Page 29: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Maps of westward- minus eastward-moving rainfall variance (k=1-25, 2-96 day)

TRMM SPCAM

WRF AM2.1

Page 30: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Summary

• Results of this study indicate a linkage between biases in simulated time-mean rainfall and its variability:

– Too much rain at off-eq. latitudes

– Too strong coupling between convection and westward-propagating (rotational) wave disturbances

Page 31: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Open questions

• Is the westward bias in convective wave activity a consequence or a cause of time-mean biases in rainfall?

• What determines the degree of coupling between convection and rotational (Rossby) vs. divergent (Kelvin, n = EIG wave modes)?

Page 32: Tropical Biases in Next-Generation Climate Models

Proposal

• A test case for measuring the strength of coupling between convection and rotational vs. divergent circulation anomalies

• Basic idea: perturb a large-domain model by imposing 3D rotational vs. divergent circulations anomalies (i.e., a step beyond SCM approaches) – Parameterized vs. explicit– Coarse vs. fine resolution