TROD 7-8 OCAK 2017 RADISSON BLUE, ŞİŞLİ ISTANBUL · PDF fileGIS Topics for Banu Atalar, MD...

73
TROD 7-8 OCAK 2017 RADISSON BLUE, ŞİŞLİ ISTANBUL

Transcript of TROD 7-8 OCAK 2017 RADISSON BLUE, ŞİŞLİ ISTANBUL · PDF fileGIS Topics for Banu Atalar, MD...

  • TROD7-8 OCAK 2017

    RADISSON BLUE, LISTANBUL

  • GIS Topics for Banu Atalar, MD

    Rectal Cancer: The initial results for a phase III study of short-term versus long-term

    chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (STELLAR trial) Phase I trial of Trametinib and Neoadjuvant 5FU Chemoradiation in Locally

    Advanced Rectal Cancer

    HCC and liver metastases: Combined Analysis of Two Prospective Trials of Individualized Adaptive

    Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Liver Metastases

    A Pilot Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Followed by Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • RECTAL CANCER

    SHORT vs LONG

  • Polish Study, 2006

    (Bujko,Br J surgery, 2006)

    cT3 or cT4 rectal cancer

    N=316

    5 Gy x 5155 hasta

    50.4 Gy+ bolus5-FU+ LV

    weeks 1&5 157 hasta

    Surgery

    7 gn4-6 hafta

    4yr LR: short 11% vs CRT 16% (NS)

    4yr OS: short 66% vs CRT 67% (NS)

    Early Gr 3-4 toxicity higher in CRT arm: 3 vs 18% with NS difference in severe

    late toxicity.

    KTRT ile downstaging daha fazla

  • TROG StudycT3N0-N2M0

    rectal ACA

    50.4 Gy+ CI 5-FU+ surgery

    in 4-6 weeks

    6 Cycles adjuvant Chemo

    SCRT (5 Gy x 5) + surgery in 1

    week

    4 Cycles adjuvant Chemo

    pCR 1% vs 15%

    Downstaging28% vs 45%P=0.002

    Ngan JCO 2012

  • Stockholm III (1998-2013)- Toxicity Group 1: SCRT + immediate surgery within 1 week

    Group 2: SCRT + surgery at 4-8 wks

    Group 3: Conventional RT + surgery at 4-8 weeks

    Interim results: no significant differences in postoperative complications between groups (46.6, 40.0 and 32%; P = 0.164).

    Patients receiving short-course RT with surgery 11-17 days after the start of RT had the highest complication rate (24 of 37)

    Pettersson Br J Surg 2010

  • Stockholm trials-Downstaging

    Uzun dnem sonularbekleniyor.

  • Polish Study II, Phase 3, 2016

    (Bujko, Ann Oncol, 2016)

    cT3 or cT4 rectal cancer

    N=514

    5 Gy x 5+ FOLFOX x 3

    50.4 Gy+ bolus5-FU+ LV

    weeks 1&5 (weekly oxali)

    Surgery pCR 16% vs 12%

    3Y OS 73% vs 65%, p=0.046

    LF 22 vs 21% at 3Y p=0.8212 hafta RT-cerrahi

  • Short-course radiotherapy followed by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer the RAPIDO trial

    Primary objective is 3YDFS Secondary objectives

    to describe the toxicity profile the rate of completion of preoperative

    treatment fraction of patients with a radical

    resection (R0) to determine the rate of pathological

    complete response (pCR) local recurrence rate after 3 years quality of life (QoL) functional outcome and overall survival

    Sweden & The Netherlands

  • Optimal Timing of Surgery from the end of RT GRECCAR-6 trial cT3-T4, or N+ who recd std CRT Randomized to 7 weeks or 11 weeks until surgery Primary endpoint pCR

    Results pCR at 7 wks: 15% and 11 wks: 17% Similar rates of anastomotic leakage More difficulty with perineal wound healing after APR in 11 wks (43%) vs 7 wk

    (17%) Higher morbidity and greater surgical complications with waiting 11wks

    Lefevre JCO 2016

  • RECTAL CANCERIst Oral Presentation

  • The initial results for a phase III study of short-term versus long-term chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (STELLAR trial)

    AY. Tang1, J. Jin1, S. Li1, N. Li1, Y. Zhu2, S-X. Liu3, W-L. Wang4, J. Wang5, X. Wang6, G-F. Li7, M. Shi8, L. Fan9, K. Zhang10, H. Ren1, Y-X. Li1, H. Fang1, W-H. Wang1, Y-W. Song1, Y-P. Liu1, S-L. Wang1, Y. Tang1, B.

    Chen1

    Corresponding Author: Jing Jin11Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China2Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China3Radiation Oncology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China4Radiation Oncology, Guizhou Provincial Cancer Hospital, Guiyang, China5Radiation Oncology, Hebei Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China6Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China7Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China8Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Xian, China9Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China10Radiation Oncology, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, China

  • Purpose and type of STELLAR trial Purpose

    To compare effectiveness of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer.

    Interim analysis Planned when first 100 patients finished TME surgery.

    Study typeProspective, Multicenter, Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Study (NCT02533271)

  • Trial Design

    Aged 18-70 Distal or middle third

    rectal adenocarcinomas T3-T4 and/or N+ diagnosed by

    MRI ECOG PS 0-1 No previous anti-cancer

    treatments

    Estimated Enrollment: 552Ra

    ndom

    ize

    1:1

    Long-term CRT

    CAPOX 6#, q21

    TME

    SCRT CAPOX 4#, q21TM

    E

    Stratified by status of mesorectal fascia (MRF) : (MRF- vs. MRF+) Non inferiority comparison

    Primary Endpoint3y-DFS

    Secondary EndpointsOS, LC, DM, Surgical complications, Toxicities, QOL

    Control group

    Experimental group

    Pelvic RT: 45-50.4 Gy /1.8-2.0 GyConcurrent Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 bid, 5f/w

    CAPOX:Capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, bid, d1-14)Oxaliplatin (130mg/m2, d1)

    Pelvic RT: 25 Gy /5 Gy

    CAPOX 2#, q21

  • Trial flow chartPotentially eligible n=184

    Excluded, did not meetInclusion criteria n=12

    Randomised n=172

    Allocated to CRT n=84

    Allocated to 55Gy + CTn=88

    Underneoadjuvant treatment

    Experimental n=28 Control n=26

    Waiting for surgery

    n=13

    No surgery n=10

    Had finishedneoadjuvant treatment

    n=60

    Had finishedneoadjuvant treatment

    n=58

    Received surgery

    n=37

    Waiting for surgery

    n=10

    No surgery n=10

    Received surgery

    n=38

    Until September 1, 2016, 172 eligible patients from 10 Chinese hospitals were enrolled Baseline characteristics

    Analysis

    Toxicities Analysis

    Surgery and Histopathology analysis

  • Results

    Baseline characteristics SCRT + CT(N=88) CRT(N=84)No. % No. %

    Age in years (range) 57y20-70y 52y34-70yDistance from tumor to anal verge (cm) 4cm0-10cm 4cm0-8cmGender Male

    Female6523

    73.8%26.2%

    6123

    72.6%27.4%

    Clinic T staging (base on MRI) T1T2T3

    T3aT3bT3cT3d

    T4

    05

    659

    3816

    218

    05.7%

    73.8%10.2%41.2%18.2%

    2.2%20.5%

    03

    698

    3820

    312

    03.5%

    82.1%9.5%

    45.2%23.8%

    3.6%14.3%

    Clinic N staging (base on MRI) N0N1N2

    164230

    18.2%47.7%34.1%

    213825

    25%45.2%29.8%

    Clinic staging (base on MRI) IIIII

    1672

    18.2%81.8%

    2163

    25%75%

    MRF status PositiveNegative

    3454

    38.6%61.4%

    3153

    36.9%63.1%

    MRI: Magnetic Resonance ImagingMRF: Mesorectal fascia

  • ResultsToxicities related to

    neoadjuvant treatmentGrading SCRT + CT(N=60) CRT(N=58)

    No. % No. %

    Period during 5 5Gy or chemoradiotherapy

    01-23-4

    29310

    48.3%51.7%

    0

    0553

    094.8%5.2%

    Period between 5 5Gy and chemotherapy

    01-23-4

    183012

    30%50%20%

    NANANA

    NANANA

    Period during chemotherapy 01-23-4

    0537

    088.3%11.7%

    NANANA

    NANANA

    Period of all neoadjuvant treatment

    01-23-4

    04317

    071.6%28.4%

    0553

    094.8%5.2%

    NA: not applicable; Grading of toxicities was presented according to CTCAE version 3

  • ResultsTolerance to neoadjuvant treatment SCRT + CT(N=60) CRT(N=58)

    No. % No. %

    Dose reduction of radiotherapy 0 0 1 1.7%

    Interrupt of radiotherapy 0 0 2 3.4%

    Dose reduction of neo-/ concurrent chemotherapy

    6 10% 3 5.1%

    Delay of neo-/ concurrent chemotherapy 6 10% 0 0

    Interrupt of neo-/ concurrent chemotherapy 2 3.3% 0 0

    Full-dose completion rate of CRT NA 54 93.1%

    Full-dose completion rate of SCRT + CT 52 86.6% NA

    NA: not applicable

  • ResultsTreatment after neoadjuvant

    radiotherapy or chemotherapySCRT + CT(N=60) CRT(N=58)

    No. % No. %

    Radical surgery 37 61.7% 38 65.5%

    Wating for surgery 13 21.6% 10 17.2%

    Wait and watch due to CCR of tumor 7 11.7% 0 0

    Refuse to surgery 3 5% 6 10.3%

    Additional chemotherapy due to unresectable tumor

    0 0 2 3.5%

    Recurrence (LR or DM) 0 0 3 5%

    CCR: clinic complete responseLR: local recurrenceDM: distant metastasis

  • Surgery and Histopathology SCRT + CT(N=37) CRT(N=38)No. % No. %

    Operative model Anterior resectionAbdominoperineal resectionHartmanns

    15211

    40.5%56.7%2.8%

    16220

    42.1%57.9%

    0

    R0 resection YesNo

    343

    91.9%8.1%

    344

    89.5%10.5%

    pCR rate 9 25.7% 3 7.9%Duration of operation (min, range) 196min90-500min 184min90-345min

    Amount of bleeding during operation (ml, range) 50ml20-200ml 30ml20-200ml

    Time from operation to liquid diets (day, range) 5.5d3-9d 6d3-9d

    Time from operation to leaving hospital (day, range) 8d7-11d 8d6-14d

    Reoperation 00% 12.6%

    pCR: pathologic complete responsepCR(9) + cCR(7) =16

    Results

  • Lokal ileri rektum kanserinde Preoperatif 55Gy RT ve takiben KT: