Trinity Ruling
Transcript of Trinity Ruling
-
7/30/2019 Trinity Ruling
1/3
REL:05/17/2013
Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i s i o n b e f or e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance
s h e e t s of Southern Reporter. Readers a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e Reporter of Decisions,
Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r Avenu e, Montgomery , Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229
0649), of any t y p o g r a p h i c a l or o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may be made b e f o r e
t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern Reporter.
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMAOCTOBER TERM, 2012-2013
1120495
Ex parte BrookwoodHealth Services, Inc., d/b/a Brookwood
Medical Center
PETITION FORWRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
(In r e : A f f i n i t y Hospital, LLC, d/b/a T r i n i t y Medical Center
of Birmingham
v.
BrookwoodHealth Services, Inc., d/b/a BrookwoodMedical
Center)
(Montgomery C i r c u i t Court, CV-10-1587;
Court of C i v i l Appeals, CV-2111015)
-
7/30/2019 Trinity Ruling
2/3
1120499
Ex parte St. Vincent's Health System
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
(In r e : A f f i n i t y Hospital, LLC, d/b/a T r i n i t y Medical Center
of Birmingham
v.
St. Vincent's Health System)
(Montgomery C i r c u i t Court, CV-10-901590;
Court of C i v i l Appeals, 2111014)
MOORE, C h i e f J u s t i c e .
1120495 -- WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.
1120499 -- WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.
S t u a r t , B o l i n , P a r k e r , Main, and Wise, J J . , c on c ur .
Murdock and Shaw, J J . , concur i n p a r t and d i s s e n t i n
p a r t .
Bryan, J . , r e c u s e s h i m s e l f .*
*
J u s t i c e Bryan was a member of the Court of C i v i l Appeals
when th at cou rt con sid ere d these cases.
2
-
7/30/2019 Trinity Ruling
3/3
1120495 and 1120499
MURDOCK, J u s t i c e ( c o n c u r r i n g i n p a r t and d i s s e n t i n g i n p a r t ) .
I concur i n the d e n i a l ofc e r t i o r a r i
w i t h r e g a r d to the
a p p l i c a t i o n of the 60 % occupa ncy r u l e i n Rule 410-2-4-
. 1 4 ( 3 ) ( b ) , A l a . Admin. Code (SHPDA), as p r e s c r i b e d by 22-21
266, A l a . Code 1975. I r e s p e c t f u l l y d i s s e n t as to the d e n i a l
of c e r t i o r a r i w i t h r e s p e c t t o the a l l e g e d c o n f l i c t between the
d e c i s i o n of the Court of C i v i l Appeals i n these cases and the
d e c i s i o n of t h i s Court i n Ex parte Shelby Medical Center,
I n c . , 564 So. 2d 63 (1990).
Shaw, J . , concurs.
3