Trg I Sky Relationship Investment Model 2008
description
Transcript of Trg I Sky Relationship Investment Model 2008
A systematic approach to building strong customer relationships and long-term profitability
Building Customer Relationships The iSKY Relationship Investment Model
Page 2 |
Table of Contents
• Introduction to iSKY
• “Very Satisfied” Dilemma
• The iSKY Relationship Investment Model
• Case studies
• What We Deliver
Page 3 |
About iSKY
• Founded in 1984
• Originally focused on automotive customer satisfaction measurement
• Acquired By TRG Holdings Headquartered in Washington, DC 6,000 Employees 100+ clients Global BPO
• Acquisition fueled product development, new senior management team
• iSKY Today – market research, analytics and database integration services to help clients adopt the strategic imperative of building strong customer relationships.
Page 4 |
The “Very Satisfied” Dilemma
Page 5 |
Ser
vice
Sat
isfa
ctio
n
Product Satisfaction
•Satisfaction movement victim of its own success
•Better product and service quality were achieved, BUT…
Blue dots represent different automotive manufacturers. There is little variance between them on product or service customer satisfaction levels.
Source: JD Powers
Satisfaction no longer differentiates brands
Page 6 |
But Most Marketing Research Does A Poor Job of Predicting Loyalty
JDP - CSI versus Customer Loyalty
Source: JD Powers
■ Individual Auto
Manufacturers (e.g. BMW, Toyota, GM)
“Ideal” relationship line if Cust sat is perfect predictor of repeat purchase
■ Individual Auto
Manufacturers (e.g. BMW, Toyota, GM)
“Ideal” relationship line if Cust sat is perfect predictor of repeat purchase
% of customers who buy next car from same manufacturer as current vehicle
Summative measure of product and service quality satisfaction at manufacturer level
There is weak relationship between C-sat scores and repeat purchase.
Satisfaction Has Weak Link to Future Customer Behavior
Page 7 |
The Relationship Investment ModelProves to be a Strong Predictor of Future Behavior
So, what is it? And why is it Different?
Page 8 |
1. When we measure Investment in the brand relationship we capture the motive or intent behind loyal behavior (e.g. repeat purchase, share of wallet, referral). We refer to this as “attachment”.
2. The model is a complex, psychological construct rather than a measure of loyalty behaviors subject to situational factors.
3. The model captures customer experiences and brand perceptions together.
4. It is proven to predict future customer behavior.
5. The model provides the diagnostic information to affect Customer Attachment and behaviors.
Why Relationship Investment Modelis More Useful
Page 9 |
Commitment Is the Closest Thing We Have To A Perfect Predictor Of Future Behavior
Customer Investment Levels and Customer Loyalty
Relationship Investment Levels - a Better Predictor of Loyalty
■ Individual Auto
Manufacturers (e.g. BMW, Toyota, GM) based on Cust Sat scores
● Location based on RS scores
“Ideal” relationship line if Cust sat is perfect predictor of repeat purchase
■ Individual Auto
Manufacturers (e.g. BMW, Toyota, GM) based on Cust Sat scores
● Location based on RS scores
“Ideal” relationship line if Cust sat is perfect predictor of repeat purchase
Customer Investment strongly outperforms C-sat on predictive power of future customer behavior (e.g. repeat purchase)
Page 10 |
A Retail Case Study
Page 11 |
• Data from:• Transactions• CRM• Survey (e.g. share
wallet)
ProfitProfit
The Relationship Investment Model – The Conceptual Starting Point
We Measure:
Operational & Marketing Levers under Client’s Control that Influence Commitment:
• Processes• People• Product• Placement• Promotion• Price• Package
We Link:
•Findings are highly actionable because the strategic marketing framework we use assures we measure influencers of Commitment under your control.
•ROI for any suggested change is knowable because we link the specific levers that influence Commitment (e.g. marketing program, training) to customer spending behavior.
Attachment
Functional Connection
Personal Connection
Page 12 |
Commitment Segmentation…Retail Case StudyThe Relationship Investment Model Delivers Brand
Differentiation
Dots are individual retailers. This is based on study of 5,000 consumers capturing customer attachment for each retailer. There is a lot of variance, meaning, there is ample opportunity to differentiate on personal and functional connections.
Fully InvestedFunctionally Invested
Uninvested Personally Invested
Page 13 |
Does It Really Impact The Bottom Line?…Retail Case Study
Willingness To Pay More
0
20
40
60
80
100
PayMore
Ind
ex
$ Spend
0
20
40
60
80
100
$ Spent
Ind
ex
Uninvested Functionally Invested Personally Invested Fully Invested
Actual $$ spent
Willingness to pay more for the brand
Invested Customers Deliver Greater Profitability
We captured actual spend of 2,000 of the 5,000 customers interviewed for this retail study by re-interviewing them six months later.
Fully Invested spend 3x as much
Page 14 |
Does It Really Impact The Bottom Line?… Retail Case Study
Market Share
0
20
40
60
80
100
Market Share
Ind
ex
Number of Visits
0
20
40
60
80
100
Visits
Ind
ex
Uninvested Functionally Invested Personally Invested Fully Invested
Target brand's share of purchases during the time specified
Actual number of visits to the brand's store
Invested Customers Deliver Greater Profitability
Page 15 |
Saks RELATIONSHIP INVESTMENT Predictor Map
0.35
0.37
0.39
0.41
0.43
0.45
0.47
0.49
0.51
0.53
0.55
60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Quick Checkout
Stands Behind Service
Friendly Employees
Attentive Service
Happy Employees
Special Shopping Experience
Organized Stores
Easy to Return Merchandise
Prices
Carries Favorite Brands
PERFORMANCE
IMPORTANCE
Variety of Merchandise
Managers Quickly Resolve Problems
Employees Easy to Find
Underperforming areas negatively impact Saks Relationship Investment Strength and Profitability.
The RIM model can answer the business question of which to address based on ROI.
Page 16 |
What We Do & What We Deliver
Page 17 |
Attachment
Functional Connection
Personal Connection
• Data from: Transactions CRM Survey (e.g. share of
wallet)
ProfitProfit
The Relationship Investment Model
We Measure:
Operational & Marketing Levers under Client’s Control that Influence RIM:
Processes People Product Placement Promotion Price Package
We Link:
• Findings are highly actionable because the strategic marketing framework we use assures we measure influencers of customer investment in relationship under your control.
• ROI for any suggested change is knowable because we link the specific levers that influence Customer Relationship Investment (e.g. marketing program, training) to customer spending behavior.
Page 18 |
Fu
nct
ion
al C
on
nec
tio
ns
Personal Connections
Personally Invested
Functionally Invested
Uninvested
Fully Invested
What is Delivered….The Relationship Investment Segmentation
This can be,
• Overlaid on existing segmentation schemes
• Done for your customers or competitor’s
• Can be at conducted at all organizational levels
• Used to score your CRM database
• Combined with existing data to develop rich profiles/personas
You will know the size of each segment, who is in each and why
You will know the size of each segment, who is in each and why
Page 19 |
Relationship Investment Index – A summative measure to provide senior management with a way to easily track progress.
Simulator – This is a “what-if” scenario tool allowing managers to easily assess the impact of specific marketing and operational changes on market share, profitability or other relevant financial metrics.
Customized CRM Improvement Plans – Tactical plans with a Relationship Strength driven managerial strategy providing highly specific action steps, expected outcomes and a project management plan to make it all happen.
The iSKY Relationship Investment Model Drives Profitable Change
The iSKY Relationship Investment Model Drives Profitable Change
What is Delivered….SummaryWe Also Deliver…