Trestles Case Study – Chad NELSEN
-
Upload
surfrider-foundation-europe -
Category
Travel
-
view
478 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Trestles Case Study – Chad NELSEN
Save Trestles
A case study in wave protection
The threat
California Coastal Act“[I]t would be difficult to imagine a more
environmentally damaging alternative location for the proposed toll road and one which would be more clearly inconsistent with the environmentally sensitive habitat resource protection requirements contained within Coastal Act Section 30240.”
“No measures exist that would enable the proposed alignment to be found consistent with the Coastal Act.”
Conclusions
Major impacts to a sensitive & highly used natural area
Not consistent with the California Coastal Act.
Inconsistent with other state and federal laws?
Massive public response was the difference
Toll road project rejected by the CA Coastal Commission & US Department of Commerce
The threat isn’t over
FutureTCA back to the drawing board
Lawsuits settled but can be reopened
TCA considering alternatives
Project isn’t dead
TCA has no reason to stop promoting the road
Toll road alternatives vs. transportation alternatives
Key Elements
Effective Coaltion / Strong leader
Strategic focus
Coordinated communication / strong brand
Activist turn out
Well supported
www.savetrestles.org
A Special Place
Healthy, natural watershed
San Mateo creek is a baseline for clean water
San Onofre State Park
Donna O’Neill Land Conservancy
11 Federally listed species
Native American archeology
Trestles: A World Class Surfing Area
IMPACTS
Bisect State Park
Eliminate campground
Pollute creek
Alter sediment transport in watershed
Alter surfing
Destroy Native American archeological sites
Massive Public Response
TCA EIR hearing
Largest attended California Parks and Recreation Commission
Large Coastal Commission hearing in history (~3000)
Secretary of Commerce hearing (~3500)