Trauma Redesign Process
-
Upload
margaret-murphy -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
3
Transcript of Trauma Redesign Process
T
M
a
Hb
Hc
E(J
KtorS
d
C
Ea
S
t
E
gArimrrrfOstpcOabocT
E
Conference Abstracts
tiatives developed and the subsequent challenges ofimplementation.
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury; Abbreviated WestmeadPost-Traumatic Amnesia Scale; Westmead Post-TraumaticAmnesia Scale; Post-traumatic amnesia; Emergency
doi:10.1016/j.aenj.2010.08.287
Priority Zero—–The Red Blanket
Reducing the transfer delay of the trauma patient fromthe Emergency Department to the Operating Room
Kerena Grant, Michael Handy
Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Level 2 James MayneBuilding, Herston Rd., Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Aus-tralia
E-mail addresses: Kerena [email protected] (K.Grant), William [email protected] (M. Handy).
Introduction: Severely injured trauma patients fre-quently require operative management to stem exsanguina-tion. An internal audit conducted within the Royal Brisbaneand Women’s Hospital identified delays in the transfer ofnon-responding hypotensive trauma patients from the Emer-gency Room (ER) to the Operating Room (OR). As a result theRed Blanket process was adapted from Los Angeles CountyTrauma Centre and implemented. The Red Blanket is a pro-cess of rapid transfer to the OR that bypasses a number ofthe normal procedures such as consent, property lists, preop check lists and anaesthetic availability.
Data methods: Data were retrospectively collected fromthe Queensland Trauma Registry (January 2006 to October2007) and prospectively by the Trauma Service based on doc-umented activation of the Red Blanket Protocol (November2007 to February 2010). Inclusion criteria included traumapatients with a systolic blood pressure of ≤90 who failedto respond to initial fluid resuscitation or required damagecontrol surgery with an ISS >16. ED to OR transfer time wascalculated from time of ED arrival until time of OR arrivaland process times were compared.
Results: Pre-implementation identified 12 cases (8 male)with a mean age of 49 yrs (range, 30—84 yrs) and amean transfer time of 206 ±SD 140 min (median189). Post-implementation identified 20 cases (11 male) with a meanage of 35 yrs (range, 18—77 yrs) and a mean transfer timeof 19 ±SD 11 min (median17) from ED to OR. This differenceis statistically significant (p < 0.005).
Conclusion: Results suggest that implementation of theRed Blanket protocol contributed to a reduction in meantransfer time from ED to OR by 187 min. Further decrease intransfer time may be achieved with additional research andeducation.
Keywords: Trauma; Damage control surgery; EmergencyDepartment; Operating theatre; Protocol
doi:10.1016/j.aenj.2010.08.288
AcrtrfppR
147
rauma Redesign Process
argaret Murphy, Carla Edwardsb, Julie Seggiec
Emergency Department, Emergency Services, Westmeadospital, PO Box 533, Wentworthville, NSW 2145, AustraliaThe Centre for Health Innovation & Partnership, Westmeadospital, AustraliaTrauma Services, Westmead Hospital, Australia
-mail addresses: Margaret [email protected]. Murphy), carla [email protected] (C. Edwards),ulie [email protected] (J. Seggie).
eywords: Trauma team training using simulation; Traumaeam redesign; Contextualising trauma team training tone’s own local environment; Organisational change usingedesign methodology; Training the entire trauma team;imulation; Education
oi:10.1016/j.aenj.2010.08.289
linical 3C
mergency to Rapid Access for TIA: Optimising diagnosticsnd secondary prevention in a regional setting
haran Ermel, Lily Samson, Penni Edwards
Bendigo Health, PO Box 126, Bendigo, Victoria 3552, Aus-ralia
-mail address: [email protected] (S. Ermel).
Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) presentations to emer-ency departments pose a clinical dilemma for clinicians.ccess to inpatient beds and neurology expertise isestricted, especially in rural and regional areas. Evidencendicates that acute TIA presentations warrant a full assess-ent and diagnostic evaluation within 24 h of onset for high
isk presentations, and within a maximum of 72 h for lowisk presentations.1 In an audit undertaken at a Victorianegional health service emergency department (ED), it wasound that these recommendations were not being realised.f the cohort discharged directly from ED (n = 20), repre-enting 29% of ED TIA discharges, 85% underwent a computedomography of the brain (CTB) while in ED, and 65% hadathology drawn. Only 35% of TIA discharges underwentarotid doppler studies, with the mean delay of 8.9 days.nly 35% of the cohort were discharged on anti-plateletgents, and 15% on lipid-lowering medication. Lifestyleehaviour modification advice was provided to only 30%f the discharged cohort. Ten percent of TIA patients dis-harged from ED, re-presented within 28 days with eitherIA or stroke.
In the absence of a dedicated TIA clinic, theD collaboratively developed a pathway to the Rapidccess Clinic (RAC). The pathway includes risk stratifi-ation and admission criteria, evidence-based assessmentequirements and secondary prevention recommenda-ions. All TIA patients being discharged to the RACeceive request slips for outpatient carotid dopplers,
asting pathology and cardiac echo, as well as TIAatient education, and RAC information. In addition,atients are being referred to the ED Hospital Admissionisk Program (ED-HARP) for co-ordination of appoint-