Transversity via Drell-Yan processes
description
Transcript of Transversity via Drell-Yan processes
llpp
Transversity via Drell-Yan processes
Physics with polarized antiprotons at GSI-PAX
TTA direct access to transversity
Transverse Single Spin Asymmetries
QCD “theorem”: (Sivers)D-Y = – (Sivers)DIS
Time-like e.l.m. form factors
SSA in 1F
Elastic processes
SLSSLLNNN AAA AA , , ,,
NA
2Fform factors and vs.
spin misteries like in pp ?
M. Anselmino, Milano, May 4, 2005
Polarization data has often been the graveyard of fashionable theories. If theorists had their way, they might just ban such measurements altogether out of self-protection.J.D. Bjorken
St. Croix, 1987
Parton distributions
are fundamental leading-twist quark distributions
quark distribution – well known
quark helicity distribution – known
transversity distribution – unknown
all equally important
related to
positivity bound
qq , and 1h (or ) , qq T
qqq
qqq
qqqT
q qq 5 chiral-even
qT qq 5 related to chiral-odd
qqqT ||2
ggg gluon helicity distribution – poorly known
+–– –
++ ++ +
+ =),( 2Qxq),( 2Qxq
+– =),( 2Qxq
),( 2QxqT
|| 2
1 iin helicity basis
–++ –
),( 21 Qxh decouples from DIS
h1 must couple to another chiral-odd function. For example: D-Y, pp → μ+μ- X, and SIDIS, l p → l π X, processes
++ –
++
–
+ ––
– +
–
+ –
h1 x h1
h1 x Collins function
J. Ralston and D.Soper, 1979 J. Cortes, B. Pire, J. Ralston, 1992
J. Collins, 1993
Elementary LO interaction:
3 planes: plane ┴ polarization vectors,p-γ* plane, μ+μ- γ* plane
)( )()( )(1 94
21212
212
2
2
2
xqxqxqxqexxsMdxdM
daaaa
aa
F
/2 / 22121 sQxsMxxxxx LFF
plenty of spin effects
q q
q qqqqqTTTT xqxqxqxqe
xhxhxhxheaA
)()()()(
)()()()(ˆ
dddd
21212
211121112
h1 from
)cos(2 cos1
sinˆdˆdˆdˆdˆ 2
2
TTa
RHIC energies:
small x1 and/or x2
h1q (x, Q2) evolution much slower than
Δq(x, Q2) and q(x, Q2) at small x
ATT at RHIC is very smallsmaller s would help Martin, Schäfer, Stratmann, Vogelsang
Barone, Calarco, Drago
22 GeV 100 GeV 200 Ms3102
Xllpp at RHIC
h1 from
)()(
)()(ˆ)()()()(
)()()()(ˆ
21
2111
21212
211121112
xuxuxhxha
xqxqxqxqe
xhxhxhxheaA uu
TT
q q
q qqqqqTTTT
22 GeV 2 GeV 21030 MsGSI energies: large x1,x2
one measures h1 in the quark valence region: ATT
is estimated to be large, between 0.2 and 0.4
at GSIXllpp
Energy for Drell-Yan processes
"safe region": /JMM
sM J /
2
QCD corrections might be very large at smaller values of M:
yes, for cross-sections, not for ATT K-factor almost spin-independent
Fermilab E866 800 GeV/c
H. Shimizu, G. Sterman, W. Vogelsang and H. Yokoya, hep-ph/0503270
V. Barone et al., in preparation
s=30 GeV2 s=45 GeV2
s=210 GeV2s=900 GeV2
s=30 GeV2 s=45 GeV2
s=210 GeV2s=900 GeV2
data from CERN WA39, π N processes, s = 80 GeV2
J/ψq q
q
l+
l–
l+
l–
all vector couplings, same spinor structure
and, at large x1, x2
measure ATT also in J/ψ resonance region
llXJpp /
/2
/2
))((
JJ
Vl
Vq
MiMMvuguvg
2
) )((M
vueuveq
q
*
*/ ˆˆ TT
JTT aa
)()()()(
)()()(
)()()(ˆ
21
2111
212
21112
xuxuxhxh
xqxqg
xhxhgaA uu
qVq
q qqVq
TTTT
M. A., V. Barone, A. Drago and N. Nikolaev
Single Spin Asymmetries (and their partonic origin)
pq
Pqπ
k┴Collins effect = fragmentation of polarized quark
depends on Pq· (pq x k┴)
P
pk┴
Sivers effect = number of partons in polarized proton depends on P · (p x k┴)
q
pk┴
Boer-Mulders effect = polarization of partons in unpolarized proton depends on Pq · (p x k┴)
qPq
Collins: chiral-odd
Sivers: chiral-even
Boer-Mulders: chiral-odd
These effects may generate SSA
d dd d
NA
BNL-AGS √s = 6.6 GeV 0.6 < pT < 1.2 p↑p
E704 √s = 20 GeV 0.7 < pT < 2.0 p↑p
STAR-RHIC √s = 200 GeV 1.1 < pT < 2.5 p↑p
E704 √s = 20 GeV 0.7 < pT < 2.0 p↑p
SSA, pp → πX
SSA, SIDIS
Transversity and SSA in Drell-Yan processes
)cos(2 sin cos1d 22unp
),(),( 221111
kxhkxh
Boer-Mulders functions
)sin( sin2SNA
),(),( 221111
kxhkxh
extract these unknown chiral-odd functions from unpolarized cross-section
combine above measurement with measurement of AN to obtain information on h1
This AN expected of the order of a few percentsA. Bianconi, M. Radici
D. Boer, 1999
GSIat processes in SSA Other pp
)(),( 2111Y-D xfkxfA TN
Sivers function usual parton distribution
Direct access to Sivers function
test QCD basic result: DIS1Y-D1 )()( TT ff J. Collins
qqTDXpp
N DfA )( 1
usual fragmentation function
process dominated by no Collins contribution
ccqq
same process at RHIC is dominated by ccgg
Electromagnetic form factors
Jμem
p p'
)()'(||' pupupJp em
qQFmQF p )(2/)( 2
22
1
21 FFGE 21 FFGM F1(0) = F2(0) = 1
Κ = 1.79
22 4/ pmQ
In pQCD
41
QF6
2 QF
JLAB: F2/F1 ~ 1.25 GeV/Qdifficult to separate F1,F2 or
GE,GM
p p̄
In time-like region GE and GM may have relative phases
P l+
l-
θL
SN
there may be a SSA: σN - σ –N
σN + σ –N= Ay = Py
1
/||sin||)cos1()Im()2sin(
2222
*
EM
MEy GG
GGA
Py can be very large: predictions depend strongly on model assumptions for F2/F1
Unexpected spin effects in pp elastic scattering
larger t region can be explored in pp
pppppppp
Unexpected large polarization in pppp
What about pppp ?
Conclusions
ATT in D-Y processes at GSI energies: highway to transversity
AN and SSA: many effects expected and test of QCD theorem: (Sivers)D-Y = – (Sivers)DIS
…the transverse-spin asymmetries whose measurement is suggested for these experiments, are remarkably insensitive to shifts in the overall normalization. In summary, perturbative corrections appear to make the cross sections larger independently of spin.
They would therefore make easier the study of spin asymmetries, and ultimately transversity distributions. (G. Sterman et al.)
Exploration and separation of proton form factors, spin results from new time-like region
Spin asymmetries in proton-antiproton elastic processes: as mysterious as in proton-proton?