Transitional Buckling Model for Active Bending …fukushima/pub/amam2013...Fig1. Transitional...
-
Upload
hoanghuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
4
Transcript of Transitional Buckling Model for Active Bending …fukushima/pub/amam2013...Fig1. Transitional...
Fig1. Transitional Buckling Model (TBM)
Fig2. Simulation model Fig3. Simulation result
Fig4. Vaulting height Fig5. Map of height
Transitional Buckling Model for Active Bending Effect in Pole Vault*Toshihiko Fukushima, Satoshi Nishikawa, Kazutoshi Tanaka, Yasuo Kuniyoshi
Intelligent Systems and Informatics Laboratory, The University of Tokyo
Intelligent Systems and Informatics Lab. http://www.isi.imi.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp/
Abstract Tool-use enables us to achieve tasks that would be otherwise impossible to complete. That will be able to say in robotics. Pole vault is a method to exchange vaulter’s horizontal energy to vertical energy. Well-trained athlete actively bends a pole while pole planting phase and flying phase, so he get higher. However, previous pole vault model is not include the active bending effect. Therefore, in this study, we proposed ”Transitional Buckling Model” which accounted for athlete’s active bending on the pole by combining Euler’s buckling model and previous model. In addition, we found out how the robot should actuate the pole.
Introduction■ Tool-use enables robot to achieve tasks that would be otherwise impossible to complete.■ Pole vault can exchange horizontal kinematic energy to vertical potential energy.■ Athlete’s active bending has a large effect to enhance vaulting height.
Proposed Model
Experiments & Results
Conclusion■ Transitional Buckling Model was able to account active bending effect.■ Input bending moment improved the vaulting performance.■ We presented one of the way to use skillfully the flexible and complex tools.
Advantage of Active Bending
<Transitional Buckling Model (TBM)>
Treat active bending effect by varying end support coefficient C
(phase-1) Planting phase: active bend -> increase C(phase-2)Straightening phase: negative bend -> decrease C
<Pole vault Simulation>2D simulation by solving equation of motion.■ Compare TBM with previous model - Compare the vaulting height at each initial velocity ■ Analyze bending strategies for vaulting higher - Explore timing and speed of changing bending direction
Skill of Active BendingActive bending improved performance of pole vault.
Usage of hysteresis:Change virtual spring constant in pole bending and straightening
<How to bend>
Timing:when pole was bent maximally
Rate:like a step inputTiming l [m/s]
Rat
e C(
u)
ramp
step
Vaultingheight [m]
0
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.4
7.6
-5 5.
.
6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 95
6
7
8
Vau
lting
hei
ght H
v [m
]
Initial velocity v0 [m/s]
PreviousTBM
θ
l + l0
θ0
l0
fs
v0
x
y
O
u
h0
m
0-1-2-3-40
1
2
3
4
x [m]
y [m
]
trajectory velocity
fs
C = 1C < 1
fs fs
C > 1 C = 2
fs
positivebend
negativebend
pinedsupport
(phase-1) (phase-2) fixedsupport
end-s
uppo
rt con
dition
Euler’s buckling modelC = 1
fs
pinnedsupport
C = 2
fs
fixedsupport
previous pole vault model