Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

26
Capital District Transportation Authority North/South Corridors Study and Action Plan Parsons Brinckerhoff In association with Creighton Manning Engineering Arch Street Communications

description

Larry LennonParsons BrinkerhoffThe NYS Metropolitan Planning Organization Association has conducted a state-wide project on Transit Supportive Development. This overall effort, including the results of an extensive literature review and three other case studies will provide basic information on the “state-of-the-practice” and “lessons learned” of TSD in NYS. CDTA will highlight the results of its case which focused on bus transit, BRT and the incorporation of a transit center into the proposed Convention Center in Downtown Albany and to examine State Street in the downtown area as a BRT corridor. Key findings and lessons will be shared. The session will wrap up with a presentation of a recently completed North-South Corridor Study which provided multimodal transit recommendations supportive of regional “concentrated growth” scenarios developed by the MPO.

Transcript of Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Page 1: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Capital District Transportation Authority

North/South Corridors

Study and Action Plan

Capital District Transportation Authority

North/South Corridors

Study and Action Plan

Parsons BrinckerhoffIn association with

Creighton Manning EngineeringArch Street Communications

Parsons BrinckerhoffIn association with

Creighton Manning EngineeringArch Street Communications

Page 2: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

North-South Corridors StudyNorth-South Corridors Study• Recommend the most effective services

for commuters traveling in the corridors between Saratoga and Albany

• Evaluate• Existing Northway Express

• Commuter Rail• Light Rail Transit (LRT)• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

• Recommend the most effective services for commuters traveling in the corridors between Saratoga and Albany

• Evaluate• Existing Northway Express

• Commuter Rail• Light Rail Transit (LRT)• Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Page 3: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

New Visions 2030 Growth Scenarios

New Visions 2030 Growth Scenarios• Status Quo

Trend• Concentrated

Growth• Trend Hyper-

Growth• Concentrated

Hyper-Growth

• Status Quo Trend

• Concentrated Growth

• Trend Hyper-Growth

• Concentrated Hyper-Growth

Page 4: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Commuter Rail Characteristics

Commuter Rail Characteristics

• Longer corridors, wider station spacing• Operates on active and inactive freight

and inter-city rail lines• Diesel or overhead electric propulsion• Locomotives pulling cars or DMU/EMU• Typically one station in downtown

• Longer corridors, wider station spacing• Operates on active and inactive freight

and inter-city rail lines• Diesel or overhead electric propulsion• Locomotives pulling cars or DMU/EMU• Typically one station in downtown

Page 5: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Light Rail Transit Characteristics

Light Rail Transit Characteristics• Medium-length corridors,

more frequent station spacing• Inactive rail or dedicated right-of-way• Overhead electric or diesel propulsion• Often operates in-street downtown• Usually several stops downtown

• Medium-length corridors, more frequent station spacing

• Inactive rail or dedicated right-of-way• Overhead electric or diesel propulsion• Often operates in-street downtown• Usually several stops downtown

Page 6: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Bus Rapid TransitCharacteristics

Bus Rapid TransitCharacteristics

• Medium-to-shorter corridors, frequent station or stop spacing

• Partially or fully dedicated right of way

• On-board diesel or hybrid propulsion• Can operate on-street or in

dedicated right-of-way

• Medium-to-shorter corridors, frequent station or stop spacing

• Partially or fully dedicated right of way

• On-board diesel or hybrid propulsion• Can operate on-street or in

dedicated right-of-way

Page 7: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

BRT System ComponentsBRT System Components

ITS & Fare Payment

Stations & Stops

Service Plan

Vehicles

Running Ways & TSP

Page 8: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Spectrum of BRT Systems

Spectrum of BRT Systems

BRT “Lite”• Mixed traffic • Queue jumps• Skip stops

BRT “Lite”• Mixed traffic • Queue jumps• Skip stops

“Exclusive” BRT• Dedicated ROW• Signal priority • Larger fixed stations

“Exclusive” BRT• Dedicated ROW• Signal priority • Larger fixed stations

Page 9: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

LA Metro Railroad Corridor BRTLA Metro Railroad Corridor BRT

Before After

Page 10: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Proposed Translink Eugene/Springfield BRT Lane

Proposed Translink Eugene/Springfield BRT Lane

Before Before After

Page 11: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Four Preliminary Commuter Rail Alternatives

Four Preliminary Commuter Rail Alternatives

Page 12: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Five Preliminary BRT/LRT Corridors

Five Preliminary BRT/LRT Corridors

Page 13: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan
Page 14: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

FindingsFindings

• Proposed improvements to NX and local bus services sufficient to meet future demand in US 9/I-87 corridor

• Light rail expensive relative to potential market

• Commuter rail options can build-on investments made for other purposes

• Proposed improvements to NX and local bus services sufficient to meet future demand in US 9/I-87 corridor

• Light rail expensive relative to potential market

• Commuter rail options can build-on investments made for other purposes

Page 15: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

FindingsFindings

• River Corridor has high potential benefits• Existing riders and new markets• Higher market demand than US 9/I-87

corridors• Focuses regional transit investment in

targeted redevelopment areas

• River Corridor has high potential benefits• Existing riders and new markets• Higher market demand than US 9/I-87

corridors• Focuses regional transit investment in

targeted redevelopment areas

Page 16: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

FindingsFindings

• River Corridor alignments require further analysis• Conversion of CPR alignment to BRT

• Potentially complicated and expensive

• Proposed street alignment on US 4/NY 32• Too slow to attract longer distance, express

trips• Develop improvements to increase speed

• River Corridor alignments require further analysis• Conversion of CPR alignment to BRT

• Potentially complicated and expensive

• Proposed street alignment on US 4/NY 32• Too slow to attract longer distance, express

trips• Develop improvements to increase speed

Page 17: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Action Plan Action Plan

Page 18: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Near-Term 2009-2014 Northway Express

Near-Term 2009-2014 Northway Express

• Restructure routes & increase service

• Provide reverse commute service• Simplify fare zone structure• Rationalize fares/equity in discounts• Study potential priority treatments• Implement 2nd Exit 9 park-and-ride

lot

• Restructure routes & increase service

• Provide reverse commute service• Simplify fare zone structure• Rationalize fares/equity in discounts• Study potential priority treatments• Implement 2nd Exit 9 park-and-ride

lot

Page 19: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Near-Term 2009-2014

River Corridor BRT

Near-Term 2009-2014

River Corridor BRT

• Refine project re: FTA Small Starts• Develop consensus on BRT and Transit

Oriented Development (TOD) policies• Identify preferred BRT alignment (CPR Rail

or US4/NY32 On Street Alignments)• Complete development and begin

construction

• Refine project re: FTA Small Starts• Develop consensus on BRT and Transit

Oriented Development (TOD) policies• Identify preferred BRT alignment (CPR Rail

or US4/NY32 On Street Alignments)• Complete development and begin

construction

Page 20: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Near-Term 2009-2014

West Corridor Commuter Rail

Near-Term 2009-2014

West Corridor Commuter Rail

• Extend selected existing Amtrak trains to Saratoga

• Double track the existing rail line to Schenectady (State project)

• Construct station in Albany at Broadway• Construct SUNY-Airport-Harriman station

• Extend selected existing Amtrak trains to Saratoga

• Double track the existing rail line to Schenectady (State project)

• Construct station in Albany at Broadway• Construct SUNY-Airport-Harriman station

Page 21: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Mid-Term 2015-2020

Northway Express

Mid-Term 2015-2020

Northway Express• Construct queue

jumps & signal priorities

• Increase NX service frequency

• Develop Saratoga local shuttles such as a Luther Forest connection

• Construct queue jumps & signal priorities

• Increase NX service frequency

• Develop Saratoga local shuttles such as a Luther Forest connection

Page 22: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Mid-Term 2015-2020

River Corridor BRTMid-Term 2015-2020

River Corridor BRT

• Complete construction of River Corridor facilities

• Begin service operations

• Complete construction of River Corridor facilities

• Begin service operations

Page 23: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Mid-Term 2015-2020

West Corridor Commuter Rail

Mid-Term 2015-2020

West Corridor Commuter Rail

• Add shuttle services to SUNY and Albany International Airport

• Construct intermediate station at Ballston

• Add shuttle services to SUNY and Albany International Airport

• Construct intermediate station at Ballston

Page 24: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Long-Term 2021-2030

Northway ExpressLong-Term 2021-2030

Northway Express

• Construct managed-use lanes in the Northway corridor

• Increase NX service frequency

• Construct managed-use lanes in the Northway corridor

• Increase NX service frequency

Page 25: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Long-Term 2021-2030

River Corridor BRT and West Corridor Commuter Rail

Long-Term 2021-2030

River Corridor BRT and West Corridor Commuter Rail• River Corridor

• Enhance service to respond to demand

• Commuter rail• Expand commuter rail service by

procuring rail equipment

• River Corridor• Enhance service to respond to demand

• Commuter rail• Expand commuter rail service by

procuring rail equipment

Page 26: Transit Supportive Development Case Study and CDTA’s North-South Corridors Action Plan

Thank You!Thank You!