TRANSFORMING GEOSPATIAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AT DOI Geospatial Modernization Blueprint Implementation...

TRANSFORMING GEOSPATIAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AT DOI

Geospatial Modernization Blueprint Implementation

Friday, October 31, 20081

Enterprise Geographic Information Management Team

Geospatial Modernization Blueprint

2

What’s the GMBT Scope?

DOI Geospatial Segment Architecture

Integrated Geospatial Operations

Mission-Oriented PartnershipsPolicy Makers

Acquisition Planners

Program Managers

FGDC

EGIM

Service Delivery

PortfolioManagement

AuthoritativeData

Sources

EnterpriseRequirements

Planning

Data LifecycleManagement

Service Level AgreementsGovernance

INTEGRATE

COORDINATE

COLLABORATE

PARTNER

ALIGNServing

CommunitiesResource

Protection

Management ExcellenceAccountability Modernization/Integration

Technology Leadership

Outreach & Collaboration

Modernized Business Practices

Stewardship & Accountability

Policy & Governance

Resource Use

Recreation

Transformational Focus Areas


What’s The GMBT Implementation Value Proposition?

3

•DOI Geospatial Programs•DOI Bureaus and Offices•Geospatial LoB•USDA – EPA - DOI

•DOI Geospatial Programs•DOI Bureaus and Offices•Geospatial LoB•USDA – EPA - DOI

Highlighted OutputsSegment Architecture DevelopedGMBT Implementation IRB Approval GeoRSS Information SharingGeo LoB WorkproductsEGIM – Core – CTOC - DAC

•Investment Management•Portfolio Management•Service Delivery

•Investment Management•Portfolio Management•Service Delivery

Highlighted OutputsEnterprise License AgreementsAuthoritative Data SourcesBusiness Requirements MgmtProducts Catalog / KB Service Level Agreements

•Architecture Development•Policy and Governance•Architecture Development•Policy and Governance

Highlighted OutputsSAOGI LeadershipGIO DesignatedGMO EstablishedADS and BRP Incorporated Into CPICSegment Architecture ImplementationSec Order – DM ChangesData Stewardship and Mgmt Policies


Overall Implementation Status

Status Area Status Trend

Schedule

Risks

Problems

GMBT Implementation Progress Report Rollup

4

Focus AreaMilestone Hit Rate % Status Trend

Policy and Governance 83%

Outreach and Communications 86%

Modernized Business Practices 100%

Stewardship and Accountability 100%

Technology Leadership 86%

=Discussion Items and Current Activity Updates

All EGIM WGs have formed, producing outputs, shifting focus to outcomes Q408

Workgroup Summaries

P&G – GIO in place Oct 1, 2008. Awaiting Geo Team appointments. ADS policy released 8/22. EGIM/Geo Team charters revised in alignment with Sec Order 3277, DM updates drafted, Outcome measures and Geo Data Policy under development.

O&C – Baseline outreach & communications products developed, moving to GMBT outreach execution mode.

MBP – Common geospatial requirements framework developed. Incorporating requirements identification process into DOI CPIC. Enterprise-wide geospatial products catalog out for EGIM review.

S&A – Facilitating ADS certification process for 6 ADSs delivered through TNM, NILS. Coordinating efforts with Geo LoB data lifecycle workgroup. Geospatial data stewardship guide under development.

TL – ESRI ELA renewal terms negotiated, IA’s due 10/31/08. CTOC collaboration continues, shifting focus to GIS SW Security STIG.

=

Report Period - 9Report Date – 10/22/08

YELLOW = YELLOW

=GREEN

YELLOW =YELLOW

GREEN

YELLOW

Y

GREEN


Modernized Business Practices Workgroup Update

5

Focus Area Status


Schedule

Risks

Problems

GREEN

Discussion Items and Activity Updates

1a – Proposal accepted and requirements milestone completed.1b – assembling information for testing – All data ready to go except BLM – George is unable to deliver this at this time.1c – Catalog out for EGIM review / feedback.2a-b – Phase I – Investment mapping framework complete, Phase II – dataset requirements attributes under development. Deb contacting TNM group for details on their catalog and products requirements tracking system. 2d – GPS team reviewing updated version of the questionnaire. 2e – Identifying FY10 target investments to conduct further requirements management. Nov 7 CPIC data call deadline3a – Complete, 3b. Numerous GeoLoB R&R EGIM inputs and reviews underway 4-Grants & Contract GeoLoB – FAR clarifications for geospatial under way with OMB. G&C doc out to EGIM for review.

GREEN

Report Date – 10/22/08Key Milestone (Zero duration , critical path event that can serve as a measure of implementation progress. )

Baseline (planned)

Finish

% Complete or Actual

Finish

1. Knowledge Management 1a – Finalize Knowledge Base Requirements1b – Pilot Knowledge Base1c – Produce Baseline Geospatial Prod. and Serv. Catalog

07/30/0812/15/0808/13/08

8/14/0885%

10/1/08

2. Business Requirements Management2a – Produce Common Geo Requirements Taxonomy2b – Produce Geospatial Requirements Capture Tool2c – GPS Requirements Survey2d – Produce Geospatial Requirements Repository 2e – Redirect FY10 Common Geo Investments 2f – Coordinate FY11 Geospatial Budget Requests

08/29/0809/15/0811/15/0812/30/0801/31/0902/28/09

09/20/0810/09/08

45%10%0%0%

3. Data Lifecycle Management3a – Designate A-16 Data Theme Leads 3b – Define Data Theme Lead Roles and Responsibilities3c – Define Data Lifecycle Stages3d – Define Themes, Datasets, and Designate Stewards

09/23/0810/01/0810/01/0810/30/08

09/23/0809/08/0809/24/08

85%

4. Grants and Contracts4a – Deliver Policy Guidance Document (pre-decisional)4b – Modify FAR & 2CFR relative to policy guidance

10/01/0810/30/08

09/17/0880%

==

GREEN =

G


Stewardship & Accountability Workgroup Update

6

Discussion Items and Activity Updates

EGIM working with TNM to validate ADS Cookbook, targeting 12/1

EGIM facilitating ADS certification process for NHD with TNM team. TNM reviewing NILS Pilot report. Targeting 3/1/09 NHD ADS

EGIM developing geospatial guidance addendums for DOI data quality and stewardship

EGIM taking Trails Solution Arch document to final. Estimating 11/14/08 completion

EGIM S&A activities aligned with Geo LoB Data Lifecycle WG

Focus Area Status


Schedule

Risks

Problems =

2008 Priority ADSs•Federal Land Ownership Status – NILS (BLM)•Digital Ortho Imagery – TNM (USGS)•Hydrography – TNM (USGS) – 3/1/09•Cadastral/PLSS – NILS (USGS and MMS)•Elevation Terrestrial – TNM (USGS)•Trails – TNM (NPS/USGS)

Report Date – 10/28/08Key Milestone (Zero duration , critical path event that can serve as a measure of implementation progress. )

Baseline (planned)

Finish

% Complete or Actual

Finish

Designate DOI Data Theme Leads 09/23/08 09/23/08

Validated ADS Stewardship Cookbook (Deb) 12/01/08 50%

Deliver Geospatial Data Quality Guide Addendum (Tom) 12/19/08 25%

Deliver Geospatial Data Stewardship Guide (Lee) 12/31/08 10%

Designate DOI Dataset Stewards (Lee) 03/30/09 10%

Deliver Trails Solution Arch. & ConOps Doc (Dave/Lorri) 11/14/08 75%

Certify Trails ADS (Lorri/Dave) 01/27/10 1%GREEN

GREEN ==GREEN

G

www.doi.gov/ocio/architecture

DOI Geospatial Tactical Opportunities

October 31, 2008

7


DOI, USDA, and EPA need a decision framework by which we can select our most urgent and common needs.

8

Who are our common stakeholders (DOI’s are

identified in the Geospatial Blueprint)

Who are our common stakeholders (DOI’s are

identified in the Geospatial Blueprint)

What needs do they have? (DOI’s are identified in the

Geospatial Blueprint)

What needs do they have? (DOI’s are identified in the

Geospatial Blueprint)

Which information can be shared between agencies to better meet stakeholder

needs?

Which information can be shared between agencies to better meet stakeholder

needs?

1 2

3


We can leverage DOI’s work on Authoritative Data Sources (ADS) for Geospatial Assets

9

USDA, EPA, and DOI could work together to mirror the DOI approach:

• DOI’s Geospatial Core Team and the Enterprise Geographic Information Management (EGIM) Team selected top candidates for ADS designation.

• The evaluation looked at functional reuse, stewardship, standards implementation, and data characteristics, such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, precision, timeliness, uniqueness, and validity.

• This evaluation led to identification of the best available candidate ADS to manage an asset of DOI-wide interest. These ADS “candidates” were ranked using the following criteria:

What is the reuse potential to the DOI business?

Is there the authority to effect change on the asset?

How well did it score against the qualitative ADS criteria?


DOI’s Geospatial Blueprint identified ADS candidates (1 of 2).

10

Candidate ADS Recommendation OrganizationA-16 federally owned lands—Candidate ADS: NILS as ADS for A-16 federal ownership boundaries (land).

BLM

National daily large fire incident and associated burn areas (not historical) from the existing business practices. Publish an interoperable map service for all to read and use. Candidates for ADS include: ICS-209, GeoMAC, or MODIS.

DOI

GAP data—Candidate ADS for NBII and its maps servers as authoritative data sources for GAP data.

USGS

DOI asset and facilities services; assets not reported via A-16 facility locator requirement—Candidate ADS is a Facilities Management Systems (FMS) standard for DOI, enterprise facilities.

DOI

Water quality and quantity tracking—Candidate ADS: NWIS services, stream gauges (water quality and quantity over time). Recommend map and data services be made available through OGC compliant interface .

USGS

A-16 Digital Ortho Imagery Large Scale and High Resolution Imagery Services—Candidate ADS: TNM (for multiple large-scale products).

USGS

National Hydrography dataset—Candidate ADS is NHD delivered through TNM.

USGS


DOI’s Geospatial Blueprint identified ADS candidates (2 of 2).

11

A-16 Cadastral Offshore—Candidate ADS: MMS offshore will assess and determine if NILS can be integrated into OCS-Connect system. If not, current plans for OGC standards-based integrated map servers should be deployed at the MMS level and provide the authoritative representation to DOI.

MMS / BLM

A-16 Elevation—Candidate ADS is TNM. USGSA-16 Cadastre—Candidate ADS: NILS for management and delivery of land net derived from survey or digitized PLSS.

BLM

A-16 Shoreline Information—Candidate ADS is MMS-delivered authoritative spatial representation of this information to DOI consumers. Coordinate with A-16 partners to ensure DOI has latest data or data of known provenance. Long-term work with NOAA to develop a map service for DOI consumers.

MMS

DRG topographic maps (seamless color balanced DRG data) — Candidate ADS is TNM. USGSA-16 Vegetation Mapping —Candidate ADS: recommend DOI use the target contributing producer process to manage its contribution to the authoritative A-16 source provider in the interim. DOI should work toward the establishment of online map and data services from the A-16 provider (USFS) via the GMO. Simultaneously, it is recommended to develop a DOI-wide ADS solution for its need for finer scale vegetation mapping (approximately 1:12k) based on the National Vegetation Classification System.

DOI

Cultural Inventory—Candidate ADS is to develop secure enterprise inventory for internal use. NPSA-16 information on law enforcement incidents—Candidate ADS is a secure map server with incident data to support analysis for law and other program areas

DOI

Offshore Minerals—Candidate ADS: OCS-Connect or MMS map services. MMS


EPA, DOI, and USDA can work together to designate Federal ADSs and establish services to share information.

• National daily large fire incident and associated burn areas (USDA, DOI)

• Water quality and quantity tracking (DOI, EPA)

• National Hydrography dataset (DOI, USDA)

• Elevation (EPA, USFS, DOI)

• Vegetation Mapping (USDA, DOI)

12

Below are some information sets that might be of value for coordinated ADS designation and service delivery.

TRANSFORMING GEOSPATIAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AT DOI Geospatial Modernization Blueprint Implementation...

Documents

Transcript of TRANSFORMING GEOSPATIAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AT DOI Geospatial Modernization Blueprint Implementation...