Transfer reactions: From Bound to Unbound states
description
Transcript of Transfer reactions: From Bound to Unbound states
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès11
Transfer reactions:Transfer reactions:From Bound to Unbound statesFrom Bound to Unbound states
I- Single-particle motion in nuclei
Spectroscopic factors ,Sum-rules
II Experimental quest : One nucleon Transfer and e,e’ p Knock out .
III Beyond bound states :transfer to resonances in the continuum
Single particle states far of Stability
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès22
Nucleon-NucleusNucleon-Nucleus mean field mean field°Mean field concept similar for
bound (shell model ) and scattering
(optical model) states.
°°In real nuclei the mean field is
non-local. V(r,r’) velocity dependence
Fluctuations of V give rise to collective
modes . Coupling of s-p motion to
Collective modes leads to V(r,r’,E).
°°°Local equivalent
V(r,E)=VHF (r,E)+ V(r,E)
Potential depth
A independent
Dynamical
content of IPM
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès33
Long Range CorrelationsLong Range CorrelationsCoupling to (1p-1h) ,…, (np-Coupling to (1p-1h) ,…, (np-
nh)nh)
IPM
1
n
EEf
IPM+Corr
1
n
EEf
Depletion of the fermi sea 15%
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès44
Proton Stripping reactionProton Stripping reaction
Single-particle states Single-particle states 208208Pb+1pPb+1p
Above 2.5 MeV strong fragmentation of Single –particle strengths !!!
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès55
Accuracy of reaction models
Cross-sections dependence on form factors ,
Optical parameters
Spectroscopic Factors & sum-ruleSpectroscopic Factors & sum-rule Pick-up S-
lj(A,A-1)= /<f(A-1)/alj /
Stripping S+lj(A,A+1)= /<f(A+1)/a+
lj /
Sum-Rule Sum of Slj on all final sates f with lj quantum numbers give
fSlj = < a+a/ nlj
number of nucleons lj in the ground state
Two obvious problems in deducing
absolute values for this sum-rule
Sum of all final fragments limited in Energy
short range correlations (up to high Ex)
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès66
Reaction model for one-nucleon transferReaction model for one-nucleon transfer
• DWBA A+a B+b b=a+/-1n one-step
• TBA= draA drbB bkb,rbB) F(raA ,r bB) a
ka,raA)
• EFR-DWBA d/dEXP
= C2Slj. K. [ TBA]2= C2S ddEFR-DW
. F contains 1) the Vnb interaction between the ejectile b and the transferred
nucleon n (from n-n or n-b phase shifts at low energies) Zero Range Vnb= Do (rbn)l0
2) the form factor flj(r) . Calculated in WS potential ,to reproduce correct binding (SE, energy dependence) . d/dDW
displays strong dependence on the radius
OM elas channels
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès77
State of the art :OSAKA 1993
P=80%30KeV
2p3/2
2p1/2
Bound states and polarized beams Bound states and polarized beams in transferin transfer
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès88
Examples : Angular distributions and asymmetries
2p3/2 ,2p1/2 in 49Ca
L=1
J=3/2
L=1
J=1/2
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès99
From stripping and pick-up :occupation From stripping and pick-up :occupation
numbers and shell closurenumbers and shell closure
Excellent closure
of f7/2
>95%
Open sd shell
15-25%
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1010
(e,e(e,e’’,p) ,p) State of the State of the
artart
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1111
LRC and SRC LRC and SRC
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1212
Persistence of s-p motion at high excitation energy ?Persistence of s-p motion at high excitation energy ? First evidence of deeply-bound hole states in heavy First evidence of deeply-bound hole states in heavy
nucleinuclei
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1313
Spin of deep-hole statesSpin of deep-hole states
1g9/2neutron-hole in 120Sn GR like structure (1-2MeV)
IUCF 1980
Broad peak1MeV
9/2+
7/2+
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1414
Selectivity for large L transfer (5-8)
Direct observation
of
Spin-orbit
partners
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1515
Transfer to Unbound statesTransfer to Unbound states
Standard DWBA • Unbound state Form Factor• Gamov function pole of the
Green s-p wave function
• gRlj(r,kr) =( ljh2kr) ei
lj Olj
Solution of Schrodinger equation for the complex energy
ERes= ER –i
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1616
Damping MechanismDamping Mechanism
=2<V>2=2<W>
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1717
Experimental observation of the Experimental observation of the damping steps (1p-1h) to (np-nh)damping steps (1p-1h) to (np-nh)
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1818
John Elbfas, 1535, Storkyrkan, Stockholm
1p splitting , 8He,12-14Be,20C,22O Mainly Pol (p,d) and (d,p)
Single-particle motion far of stabilitySingle-particle motion far of stability
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès1919
H(11Be,10Be)2H E = 35 A.MeV
10Be (coinc with 2H) 0.4o lab 1.2o
.....1220 2102/10102/1..114 dBeSsBeSBe sg
(d/d)exp=S(d/d)calc
S(2+)
S(2+) + S(0+)= 0.2
Structure of 11Be g.s. through (p,d) reaction
S. Fortier et al. PLB 461 (1999) 22J.S. Winfield et al. NPA 683 (2001) 48
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2020
Structure of Structure of 1010Li G. S Li G. S via transfer reactionsvia transfer reactions
S.Pita PhD thesis Orsay,2000
105 11Be /s
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2121
Structural changes with neutron Structural changes with neutron excessexcess
Diffuse Nuclear Surface Leads to vanishing Spin-orbit splitting
New « magic numbers »Test cases N=20, 1d splitting 28,30Ne,32Mg,34SiZ=20 N=28-40 46Ar Z=28 N=28-40,1f56Ni,68Ni
N=50-82,1g,2d 116-134Sn
RFQ - 0.75A MeV
ECRIS-HI 1mA
“SILHI-deuteron” 5mA
CIME Cyclotron RNB (fission-fragments)
E < 6-7 MeV/u,132Sn 109pps
SC - LINACE = 14.5 AMeV
HI A/Q=3E = 40 MeV - 2H
Production Cave
C converter+UCx target
Low energy RNB
> 1013 fiss./s
2. Fusion reaction with n-rich beams
1. Fission products (with converter)
4. N=Z Isol+In-flight
5. Transfermiums In-flight
3. Fission products (without converter)
Primary beams: deuterons heavy ions
Regions of the Chart of Nuclei Accesible with SPIRAL 2 beams
Regions of the Chart of Nuclei Accesible with SPIRAL 2 beams
7. High Intensity Light RIB
6. SHE
8. Deep Inelastic Reactions with RNB
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2424
NuPPEC Roadmap for the European Strategic Forum for Research Infrastructures (March 2005)
NuPECC recommends the construction of 2 ‘next generation’ RIB infrastructures in Europe, i.e. one ISOL and one in-flight facility. The in-flight machine would arise from a major upgrade of the current GSI facility. Among the intermediate steps on the road to “the EU Isol facility” EURISOL (2014) ,SPIRALII has a clear EU dimension in terms of size,investment(130M€) and site (GANIL).
Latest News
To build strong collaboations within European low energy
communities for both stable and RIB,,GANIL and Legnaro are in the
way to establish a new European laboratory ,open to all french and
italian communities and later to others. Loi are presently submitted
to a steering committee and a workshop is being prepared (April 8&9
,Legnaro ) where the scientifc goals of this new initiative will be
discussed
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2525
**Conclusions**Conclusions• Absolute spectroscopic factors for strong s-p bound valence states with
are within reach ,combining careful analysis from nucleon transfer and electron knock-out with an accuracy of (10% at best)
• But s-p have partial occupation ,rest of the strength at very high( Ex>100 MeV)
• outside shell model space • SM describes only 70% of nucleons due to SRC (15%) and LRC (15%)
• Highly fragmented sp strengths, in particular for unbound resonances embedded in the continuum suffer greatly from the use of inadequate « standard » parameters (E dependence of form factors , continuum) .
Form factors from HF-RPA or QPM models may improve the accuracy. For exotic nuclei coupling to continuum occurs even more
rapidly as a function of Ex . Careful analysis of deduced SF needed to establish for exemple
SPIN-ORBIT SPLITTING Nuclear Knock-out seems promising, in particular for
“exotic” nuclei,careful evaluation of the reaction model parameters and various kinematics ,and target conditions are certainly needed to assess the potential of this approach.
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2626
END
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2727
Neutron rich C & O isotopesNeutron rich C & O isotopes
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2828
Isopin dependence ofIsopin dependence ofspin-orbit interactionspin-orbit interaction
The Spin-orbit interaction is proportional to the nuclear distribution in a stable nucleus. In an unstable nucleus, the differential of the proton and the neutron distribution have peaks at different distances, therefore isospin dependence of the spin-orbit interaction becomes important
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès2929
Spin-Orbit SplittingSpin-Orbit Splittingsoso=a=aso so l.l.s. ds. ddr=dr=/2(2L+1) /2(2L+1)
1/V.dV/dr>=g(A) .f(n)1/V.dV/dr>=g(A) .f(n)• protons neutrons• Nucleus nl so nl so
• 12C 1p 8.24 1p 8.5 • 16O 1p 6.88 1p 6.7• 40Ca 1d 6.7 1d 6.7• 2p 2.1 48Ca 1f 8.9 2p 1.9 90Zr 1f 6.3 1g 7.9 2p 1.1 2d 2.4 140Ce 1h 6.5 2d 1.7 208Pb 1h 5.8 1i 6.4 2f 1.7 2f 1.8
G.MairlePhys.lett B1993
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3030
D132Sn
p
133Sn
VAMOS
EXOGAM
MU
STx
133Sn
132SnSn=2.7 MeV
Determine neutron-captures at stellar temperaturesSpectroscopic factors
Statistical models not valid at magic shells- Direct capture component- Compound nucleus component
15A.MeV
3/2-
7/2-
1/2-9/2-
CN
DC
Neutron Transfer on Neutron Transfer on 132132SnSn
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3131
TIARA
E* ; Lp ; SBound States
TIARA is designed to be usedwith EXOGAM and VAMOS at GANIL
W N
CA
TF
OR
D
University of Surrey
DARESBURY
68+nNi
E:500 keV
E:50 keV
44 particle + 20% particle + 20% EXOGAMEXOGAM
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3232
Absolute Spectroscopic factors from Nuclear Absolute Spectroscopic factors from Nuclear knock-out reactionsknock-out reactions
Brown,Hansen,Sherill,TostevinBrown,Hansen,Sherill,Tostevin
• One nucleon removal partial cross-sections to final identified (nlj) bound states have been measured for about 25 nuclei in sd shell and on 12C and 16O
• Theoretical s-p removal cross-sections th(nlj) has been calculated using shell model predictions for the s-f and eikonal reaction theory
• th(nlj)= j Snlj sp(Bn,lj) R= exp/ th
sp(Bn,lj) calculated from a define set of parameters S-Matrix from free nn np cross-sections, interactionor Gaussian range
functions n-core w-f calculated with empirical W-S (r,a) standard set
Outcome R=1 for l=0 and 2 transitions for 25-27Si, 10,11 Be, 14-18C R=0.5-0.6 for n and p hole in12C and 16O g.s .Strong quenching like in
e,e’ p !!
How we understand that ? How it compares to p,2p knock out ?
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3333
Inclusive single -particle spectra Inclusive single -particle spectra
Strength functions for resonance in the continuumStrength functions for resonance in the continuum
Exclusive experiments and decay properties.Exclusive experiments and decay properties.
Persistence of s-p motion Persistence of s-p motion at high excitation energy ?at high excitation energy ?
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3434
S-P response function: Exp versus QPMS-P response function: Exp versus QPM
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3535
Single Particle states - 1970Single Particle states - 1970Early experimental evidencesEarly experimental evidences
Light-Nuclei :Well separated shells Broad inner 1s shell
Medium and heavy nucleiRapidly overlapping shells
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3636
Energy dependence of the dampingEnergy dependence of the damping
width for s-p responsewidth for s-p response functionfunction
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3737
Single –Particle strenghts from Single –Particle strenghts from IASIAS
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3838
Transfer to continuum and reaction Transfer to continuum and reaction model Bonnacorso,Brinkmodel Bonnacorso,Brink
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès3939
Decay of single-particle statesDecay of single-particle states
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4040
Gamma-decay of overlapping sub Gamma-decay of overlapping sub shells in shells in 111111SnSn
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4141
Damping of deep-hole in 208PbDamping of deep-hole in 208PbExperiment and HF+RPA ModelExperiment and HF+RPA Model
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4242
Nuclear Models: Damping MechanismsNuclear Models: Damping MechanismsMass ,Energy Dependence of S(E),Mass ,Energy Dependence of S(E),
• A) HF+RPA N. Van Giai et al Pb
Bertsch, Broglia, Bortignon Sn, Pb self-consistent or effective coupling
B) Mean field + Dispersion Relation C. Mahaux et al
40Ca to 208Pb Empirical –Optical potential W-S .All coupling included
C) Semi-classical description Brink & Bonnacorso, n-N optical model
D) Quasiparticle-Phonon Model
V.G.Soloviev,Ch.Stoyanov,A.I.Vdovin,V.Voronov et al From Zr to Pb
H= Hsp+Hpair+ Hmultipole+Hspin-multipole
WS Monopole Multipole spin-multipole
part-part part-hole part-hole
Large basis s-p ,phonons (up to 25 MeV,l>5)
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4343
Comparison of Hadronic and Comparison of Hadronic and electromagnetic processeselectromagnetic processes
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4444
Quenching of S-P strengthsQuenching of S-P strengths
Summary 1
A) For bound states close the Fermi sea e,e’p
observed a severe quenching
(50+/-10%) not observed in transfer reactions
(90+-15%)
B) One can reconcile partly e,e’p and transfer
reactions values using the radius determined
in knock out experiments
,12C,16O,40Ca,90Zr,208Pb ( 70+/-15%)
Two questions remains :How realistic is the use of this radius ? (pm shift in ang. dist)Is there hidden inconsistencies in the analysis of e,e’p Renormalization of quasi-elastic Coulomb coupling ep* If ep up by 10% n increases from 50 to 70%
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4545
Fragmentation and damping of S-P Fragmentation and damping of S-P strengths for valence and deeply-strengths for valence and deeply-
bound states in e,e’pbound states in e,e’p
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4646
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4747
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4848
Proton knock-out process: (e, e Proton knock-out process: (e, e ‘‘,p),p)
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès4949
Advantages and limitations Advantages and limitations (e,e’p) versus Transfer(e,e’p) versus Transfer
PISA,February 2005PISA,February 2005Sydney GalèsSydney Galès5050