Transfer of sediments in catchment ecosystems on various...
Transcript of Transfer of sediments in catchment ecosystems on various...
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and
National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association
INSTITUTE FOR WATER AND RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT
CHAIR OF HYDROLOGY
www.kit.edu
Transfer of sediments in catchment ecosystems on various scales
Ulrike Scherer
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Transfer of sediments in catchments
rainfall
runoff
Erosion Deposition
detachment
and transport
deposition
sediment input
Attert, Luxembourg (Photo: CRP-GL)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
How can we measure soil erosion?
Soil erosion rates in the field
Mapping of erosion forms in the field
Long term soil erosion plots
Field experiments under controlled
rainfall conditions
Rainfall simulator (Weiherbach catchment, Germany) Long term soil erosion plot (Niederoesterreich, Austria)
Erosion rill in corn field (Wissembourg, France)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
How can we measure sediment delivery?
Monitoring of sediment concentrations
at the catchment outlet
Automatic water sampling
Weierbach, Luxembourg
(A. Krein, CRP-GL)
Turbidity probe in the HOAL catchment,
Petzenkirchen, Austria
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Problematik
2 0 2 4 Kilometers
N
hillslope scale small catchment basin scale
process based approaches empirical/conceptual approaches
Modeling of sediment transfer
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Represent the entire interaction of relevant processes
Rainfall / runoff
Detachment
Transport of sediment particles and aggregates
Deposition
Based on the sediment continuity equation
Process based modeling approaches
Scherer (2008)
)t,x(x
qs
x
(x,t)
qs,in qs,out
qs solid mass flow rate, kg/(m·s)
net in- / output of particles into /
out of flow, kg/(m²·s)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
CATFLOW-SED: Soil detachment
r
r cos
momentum of rainfall
)BBG1(cosvrm rwr
shear stress
0w Ihg
Scherer et al. (2012)
)fmp(pe critr21pot
detachment rate
attacking forces
erosion
resistance of
the soil
epot detachment rate, kg/(m²·s)
fcrit erosion resistance, N/m²
p1,2 empirical parameters
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
sediment concentration [g/l]
erosion rate [g/(m²min)] runoff [l/s]
time [min]
0
20
40
60
80
100
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0.01
0.1
1
sediment concentration
erosion rate
surface runoff
Rainfall simulation experiments
in the field to determine erosion
resistance
CATFLOW-SED: Detachment
Scherer et al. (2012)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Transport capacity of overland flow controls sediment transport rate
and deposition
Deposition depends on the
sinking velocity
CATFLOW-SED: Transport and Deposition
Scherer (2008)
Engelund und Hansen (1967)
2
5
5
2
transport intensity, [-]
intensity of flow, [-]
resistance coefficient, [-]
xv
vy s v flow velocity, m/s
vs sinking velocity, m/s
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Weiherbach catchment
Located in a loess region in
Southwest Germany
3.5 km²
Intensively cultivated
0
20
40
60
80
100
18:30 19:30 20:30 21:30 22:30
inte
ns
ity
[m
m/h
]
0
2
4
6
8
10
18:30 19:30 20:30 21:30 22:30
time
run
off
[m
³/s] observed
modelled
27.06.1994
Validation at the catchment scale
Gauge station in the Weiherbach catchment
Sediment yield observed modeled bias
27.06.1994 1 815 t 1 949 t + 7.4 %
12.08.1994 35 t 37 t + 5.7 %
13.08.1995 607 t 630 t + 3.8 %
Scherer (2008)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Erosion and deposition rates
in the Weiherbach catchment
0 - 0.01
0.01 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 5
5 - 10
10 - 20
20 - 50
> 50
Erosion rate [kg/m²]
Land use
stream
paved areas
grassland
forest
sunflower
sugar beet
corn
crop
0
0.01 - 0.5
0.5 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 3,5
3,5 - 6
6 - 10
> 10
Deposition [kg/m²]
Elevation [m]
162 - 173
173 - 184
184 - 195
195 - 205
205 - 216
216 - 227
227 - 238
238 - 248
0 - 0.01
0.01 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 5
5 - 10
10 - 20
20 - 50
> 50
Erosion rate [kg/m²]
Land use
stream
paved areas
grassland
forest
sunflower
sugar beet
corn
crop
0
0.01 - 0.5
0.5 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 3,5
3,5 - 6
6 - 10
> 10
Deposition [kg/m²]
Elevation [m]
162 - 173
173 - 184
184 - 195
195 - 205
205 - 216
216 - 227
227 - 238
238 - 248
Validation at the catchment scale
Scherer (2008)
Gauge station
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Most widely used empirical model:
Universal Soil Loss Equation - USLE (Wischmeier & Smith 1978)
National adaptations:
i.e. Allgemeine Bodenabtragsgleichung – ABAG (Schwertmann et al. 1987)
Modifications:
i.e. RUSLE, MUSLE
Europe:
Pan European Soil Erosion Risk
Assessment - PESERA
(Kirkby et al. 1994)
Empirical/conceptual modeling approaches
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation
BA: average long-term soil
erosion rate, t/(ha·a)
R: rainfall erosivity index,
(kJ·m)/(m²·h)
LS: topographical factor, [-]
(slope length and gradient)
C: plant cover and tillage
factor, [-]
K: soil erodibility factor,
(t·m)/(ha·a·kJ·h)
P: specific erosion control
practices, [-]
BA = R · K · L · S · C · P in t/(ha·a) long term erosion rate
Butz (2005)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Erosion rates quantified by USLE are combined with SDR approaches
to quantify sediment yields
USLE – Application for Germany
Fuchs et al. (2012), Wurbs and Steininger (2011)
SDR sediment delivery ratio, %
BAi long term soil erosion rate, t/(ha·a)
Ai size of the area i, ha
SL long term sediment load, t
1 100
n
i i
i
BA A
SDRSL
Soil loss Sediment delivery ratio
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology Fuchs et al. (2012)
Sediment delivery to surface waters
Derivation of a lumped SDR approach for German river basins
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology Fuchs et al. (2012)
Sediment delivery to surface waters
Lumped SDR approach for German river basins: validation
0.86 0.16
5002.3 ALSDR S A SDR sediment delivery ratio, %
S slope, %
AAL500 share of arable land located
close to surface water bodies
(flow distance < 500 m), %
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Retention in river systems
Forggensee reservoir
Forggensee
Karwendel region
Analysis of local retention rates (Danube basin)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Retention in river basins
Comparison of observed and modeled sediment loads (Danube basin)
Without consideration of retention rates
1km
Mouth of Inn (Google maps)
With consideration of retention rates
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Summary and conclusions
Process based modeling approaches require a large
amount of spatially highly resolved data, which is only
available for a small number of catchments.
This is why empirical/conceptual modeling approaches are
used at larger scales. But their extrapolation capability to
different landscapes and future scenarios is limited.
For the planning and implementation of mitigation
measures, the lower mesoscale (< 200 km²) is important!
Suitable modeling approaches are missing…
We need modeling approaches that balance necessary
complexity with greatest possible simplicity.
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Development of a hydrological modeling approach for meso-scale
catchments: Focus on organizing principles in a specific landscape
Outlook
Deposition
Detachment
• kinematic wave approach
sheet flow/rill structures
Channel
• sinking velocity of
particles/aggregates
• transport
capacity
• rainfall kinetic energy
• attacking forces of
overland flow
• resistance of soils
against detachment
Super-ordinate surface
flow network
verification
m
odel fo
rmula
tion
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Thank you!
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology Fuchs et al. (2012)
Sediment delivery to surface waters
Lumped SDR approach for German river basins
0.86 0.16
5002.3 ALSDR S A
SDR sediment delivery ratio, %
S slope, %
AAL500 share of arable land located
close to surface water bodies
(flow distance < 500 m), %
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology
Limits to sediment export:
driving gradient is geopotential Δφ,
resulting in water flow (Δv)
drag force of water flow drives
sediment export Js,out
depletes Δφ
depletes Δv
relevant budget:
mass balance of sediments ms
balancing detachment, deposition,
and sediment export
Motivation: Thermodynamic Limits
runoff
generation
runoff
Js,out
sediment
export
Δφ
Kleidon, Zehe, Ehret & Scherer (HESS-D)
Institute for Water and River Basin Management
Chair of Hydrology Kleidon, Zehe, Ehret & Scherer (HESS-D)
Motivation: Thermodynamic Limits
Trade-off: more work by drag to detach sediments yields lower flow
velocity v
power to detach
sediments
velocity
sediment export
strength of drag force